Public report of cytoscape/cytoscape.js, published 30 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 30 October 2026, 01:35 UTC · Survey ID cd_ae5ab35f8f3c4b35a78b622f0612366c
cytoscape/cytoscape.js
Measured 30 October 2026, 01:33 UTC, at code version acaa3ad
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
Code coverage is not measured: JavaScript/TypeScript suite (CouldNotMeasureNoCollector).
Dependency hygiene is not measured: Npm pinning read, dependency currency not (the committed lockfile resolved no direct production dependency).
Knowledge freshness is not measured: Freshness signal contradicted by repo activity.
CAI scoreAt riskDown 2 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 97,143 lines of product code in 1 project, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.7 person-years · Weakest lens: Accessibility, 34
Findings by how serious they are
46 critical441 serious55 minor
19 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
30 October 2026, 01:33 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
A critical security finding is open, such as a library with a known critical vulnerability or a password or key found in the code. The score itself is unchanged, but its band shows At risk until the finding is fixed. See the Security and Compliance lens.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
68of 68 dimensions measured by tools.
525of 542 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 17 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
68dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 97,143 lines of product code in 1 project.
cytoscape/cytoscape.js is rated At risk because critical security findings are open, most of them in the build pipeline. It scores 46 out of 100, which the At risk rating leaves unchanged.
Accessibility, at 34, is the weakest lens and counts most in the score. The best first steps are adding text alternatives and simplifying the hardest methods, each worth about 6 points. Raising Accessibility to 70 would lift the score to about 56.
Fifteen pipeline tools are referenced by a changeable name, so the build pipeline can be tampered with. Five known security holes in the packages the code depends on can be used by attackers, and thirteen form fields can't be read by a screen reader. Pinning each tool to an exact version, updating the vulnerable packages and labelling the form fields would close these risks. Limiting each secret to its own step would fix the three secrets exposed to more of the pipeline than needed, and setting a waiting period for automatic updates would deal with the automatic dependency update that takes a new release at once. The four pages that block zooming need the zoom block removed.
The product code is 97,143 lines, about €97,000 to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement documentation/demos/tokyo-railways/style.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement documentation/css/style.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/css/font-awesome.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/css/font-awesome.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard snippets/images.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/demos/images-breadthfirst-layout/code.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 70 findings
These 70 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 16 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
€32,000 to €160,000, for 536 to 1,700 hours of work, about 0.7 person-years for 1 to 2 engineers
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 46. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 97,143 lines of product code
What it is not
Not a quotation: nobody has offered to build it for that. Not a valuation: it says nothing about what the business is worth. Not a certified figure: no professional has signed it as one.
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Raises the score by about 6 points · Medium effort · Text alternatives
2
Bring the 223 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with parseImpl (cognitive 185), load::touchmoveHandler (cognitive 168), parse.styfn.parseImpl (cognitive 167).
Adopt TypeScript for the frontend: add a typecheck step to the build, then either type-check the existing JavaScript in place (`checkJs`/JSDoc types) or convert the highest-traffic modules first — no file is typed today, so this is an adoption, not a clean-up.
Raises the score by about 4 points · Medium effort · Type Safety
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €97,000 to build again, about 0.7 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Accessibility, at 34 (Weak). Accessibility is about whether the interface is built so that everyone can use it, including people who can't see the screen or can't use a mouse. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Accessibility also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Accessibility grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Accessibility actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 6 points for medium effort. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 4.9 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 8% to 18% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 2,201 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 8,926 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 1.7 to 10.4 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change, never less than 2% to 5% and never more than 40% to 60% in all; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
At a glance — Code Health · 43% · Weak · gated by D1, D2, R1 ·
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
52
High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
17
High / Critical
A07:2025 — Authentication Failures
2
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, ensure all media elements have appropriate text alternatives and captions to support accessibility. Next, reduce cognitive complexity by refactoring the most intricate functions to improve code maintainability. Simultaneously, introduce TypeScript to the frontend build process to establish type safety across the codebase. Finally, enforce accessibility standards through automated linting and CI gates, while correcting fundamental page structure issues like language attributes and landmarks.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Bring the 223 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with parseImpl (cognitive 185), load::touchmoveHandler (cognitive 168), parse.styfn.parseImpl (cognitive 167).
Adopt TypeScript for the frontend: add a typecheck step to the build, then either type-check the existing JavaScript in place (`checkJs`/JSDoc types) or convert the highest-traffic modules first — no file is typed today, so this is an adoption, not a clean-up.
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an a11y linter that can read your UI — no component framework was detected, so the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins would have nothing to lint; use an HTML-template a11y linter (html-eslint, htmlhint) or run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, then assert with @axe-core/playwright in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Bring the 12 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with parse.styfn.parseImpl (cyclomatic 115), parseImpl (cyclomatic 115), drawing-redraw.CRp.render (cyclomatic 102).
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 46
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 441
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 55
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 19
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 68 of 68 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); none rely on LLM judgement. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 68 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 525 of 542 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D3 God Classes — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was measuring file length. Those files were not read, so an oversized one cannot appear on this card; every other file was read. That is a limit of this run, not a finding about your code.
D4 Code Duplication — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The language model for this repository listed its production source (.html) but exposed no token stream for any of it, so nothing reached the token comparison.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. This repository's 1 package.json manifest(s) and its 1 committed lockfile(s) WERE read; what went unanswered is the currency half, because it grades the production `dependencies` a lockfile resolves and these manifests declare none — only 33 devDependencies, which D12 does not grade. So registry.npmjs.org was never asked, and there was nothing here for it to grade. This is a true statement about the repository and NOT a gap on our side: the lockfile was resolved, and no reader we could write would find a production dependency in it.
D14 License Compliance — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository declares no npm dependency a consumer installs, but 11 of the 396 code file(s) it ships carry a sign of vendored or bundled third-party code (for example `dist/cytoscape.cjs.js` is committed build output, which a bundler can inline undeclared third-party code into; `dist/cytoscape.esm.min.mjs` is committed build output, which a bundler can inline undeclared third-party code into; `documentation/css/hl.min.css` is declared vendored or generated (a .gitattributes, .editorconfig or lint-ignore declaration, a nested vendored package, or a generator banner); `documentation/js/cytoscape.cjs.js` is minified or bundled output, which can inline third-party code; `license-update.mjs` states a licence of its own in its header). Code copied or bundled into a repository ships under its upstream licence, and this pass has no reader for it: it grades the licences of DECLARED packages only. So there is a licence to grade here and it was not graded — a missing collector, not a statement about this repository.
D19 Documentation Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Each ecosystem's manifests (what makes a folder runnable or a published package) need their own proof before D19 judges its units. Until then those folders' READMEs are judged only as documents (boilerplate, structure), never counted as complete.
D19 Documentation Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This kind did not reach the 95 % precision gate in three adjudicated runs (docs/plans/deterministic-engine/adjudication/D19-sample3-v3.md), so by the pre-registered fallback it publishes no row until a re-measurement shows it does. The candidates are counted here, not reported as findings, and the score does not include them.
D21 Naming Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D21's deterministic naming rules are gated on C# first (docs/plans/deterministic-engine.md, P5): each other language is switched on only after its own concept suite and A/B gate pass. Until then its declarations carry no naming verdict this run — this says nothing about whether its names are consistent.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (package.json), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict. For npm the surface is what a published package.json's entry points (exports, main, module, types) export, followed through the source; an entry that names build output the tree does not commit (dist/, build/) is not followed back to source, because only a tsconfig outDir/rootDir pair states that mapping and a bundler's input lives in executable configuration this engine does not evaluate.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
D29 Static Analysis (SAST) — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Not read: `debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js`. The rule's absence of rows there is not evidence of anything.
D34 Knowledge Freshness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. File-level freshness contradicts repo activity: 75 commits in the last 90 days, yet 77 of 105 significant files carry no living knowledge. Those two readings cannot both be true, so the per-file recency signal is treated as unreliable here and freshness is not scored for this run.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. These files are in the checkout but reading them failed (an I/O or permission error), so AC6 judged no colour pair, outline removal or animation in them: debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js. Every other file was read and judged; this card says nothing about these.
AX10 Code composition — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
AX6 Interface segregation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the public interfaces this run's compilations declare, and none was loaded, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Subject: 5 markup document(s) — HTML, Razor, JSX, Vue, Svelte or server templates. The Runtime Evidence tier boots an app only via docker-compose, an Aspire AppHost, a Dockerfile, an npm dev script, a web service's own toolchain entry point (cargo, go, dotnet, Python, Spring Boot), or an Android app's own Gradle wrapper (run on an emulator); an Apple or Flutter app needs a host it lacks. None applied, so no live runtime a11y/egress/header evidence was collected. You can widen what we reach: add a docker-compose.yml (or an Aspire AppHost) that brings the app up with its dependencies. Watchdog then boots it in an isolated sandbox and gathers real runtime evidence — you change nothing in your pipeline (no CI step, no SDK).
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
M4 Documentation accuracy — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. M4 checks only the claim kinds adjudicated at or above 95 % precision: links and versions (PREREGISTRATION version 9), and artefact counts an order of magnitude off. Paths, command arguments, installs, environment variables, settings, projects, packages, routes, cd targets, infrastructure products and removed modules are read but not checked, and none of them is reported or counted.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and none applies: this repository publishes a library and deploys nothing (no container, IaC or deployment manifest), so it holds no runtime state of its own. Any data-access dependency it declares is the store it is a CLIENT for, not one it operates. The DR control belongs to whoever runs that data.
R10 Code Duplication — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused the listing or the read of: debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js. Every other path was read.
R10 Code Duplication — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 66 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 106.
S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. 187 JavaScript/TypeScript file(s) were read for weak hashes and ciphers, key material fixed in the source, disabled certificate validation and obsolete TLS versions, and none was found. The server controls this dimension also scores were not assessed, so no score is given.
X1 Async correctness — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X10 Duplicated predicate — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js` could not be listed or read, so no predicate in them was compared with any other file. Every other file was read and its findings stand.
X12 Unreachable branch — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X13 Undrained process stream — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X14 Bypassable address classification — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, PHP, Dart, Kotlin, Ruby, Scala, Java, Python and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded, and no named async function in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript, nor any Go, PHP or Dart function or Kotlin suspend function, makes a request that can be cancelled (fetch, axios, ky, ofetch; net/http, net.Dial; amphp; Dio; Ktor, OkHttp), so there is nothing to judge, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X22 Contradicted release guard — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X25 Inert configuration knob — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X28 Index access outside its own emptiness guard — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. `debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js` could not be read, so no counted loop in them was judged. Every other file was read and its findings stand.
X3 Exception handling — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Python, PHP, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded, and this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript, Python and PHP make no call through a named logger, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These files are in the checkout but reading or parsing them failed (an I/O or permission error, or a package.json that is not valid JSON), so X4 judged no log call in them, or could not tell whether the code below such a package.json logs through a structured logger: debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js. Every other file was read and judged; this card says nothing about these.
X5 Nullable reference types — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused to hand over `debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js`. These are in this check's scope (source, or a type-checking configuration — `.` is the repository itself, when the walk for configurations could not list it) and were not read, so this card's numbers cover the rest of the repository only: an unread configuration is in neither the adopted nor the total count. That is a limit of this run, not a finding about those files.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The filesystem refused debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js while this check was reading the repository. Those files were not read, so a defect in them cannot appear on this card; every other file was read.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D11 Test Reliability: Flakiness is inferred from history/markers — Watchdog runs the suite once (for coverage), not the repeated runs under varied conditions that reveal nondeterminism, so a flaky test never recorded as failing is invisible here.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality publishes two things only: a runnable or packaged unit with no example, and a multi-project root README that maps none of its parts. It does not judge clarity, and its other checks (overview, licence, boilerplate, structure, empty sections, XML-doc coverage) are withheld after adjudication: their candidates are counted in the card's gaps, not shown as rows. A false statement in a document is M4's; units are .NET projects only.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
143 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was parse.styfn.parseImpl at 115. A further 2 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being parse.toString::checkToString at 16 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score. 2 files carry no cyclomatic complexity row at all for this reason — every one of their over-threshold methods was excluded, so the exclusion is disclosed nowhere in the file itself: src/selector/parse.mjs (toString::checkToString at 16), src/selector/parse.mjs (parse.toString::checkToString at 16). They are named here because the per-file figures other dimensions report are taken BEFORE this exclusion, so such a file can show a high maximum complexity elsewhere in this report and nothing here, with nothing to reconcile the two.
+ 74 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 12 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with parse.styfn.parseImpl (cyclomatic 115), parseImpl (cyclomatic 115), drawing-redraw.CRp.render (cyclomatic 102). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 12 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 2.7 to about 4.4/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 122 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 223 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with parseImpl (cognitive 185), load::touchmoveHandler (cognitive 168), parse.styfn.parseImpl (cognitive 167). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 223 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 2.0 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes8.8 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 21 FunctionTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with index.mjs (3), edge-control-points.mjs (2), bounds.mjs (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (21 warning-level).
Resolve the 8 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with load-listeners.mjs, math.mjs, edge-control-points.mjs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with drawing-elements-webgl.mjs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
711 test methods: 711 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e. The JavaScript/TypeScript suite contributes 711 `it`/`test` case(s) across 46 test file(s) declaring at least one; its tier split is read from package names and paths only.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D10 · Test Quality9.7 / 10Stronggated by 14 serious findings✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.
Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.
0 skipped, 14 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 711 tests.
No assertions: should fire the `lock` event · ×14test/collection-position-and-dimensions.mjs:182
What to do
Resolve the 14 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with core-init.mjs (5), events.mjs (3), emitter.mjs (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D11 · Test Reliability10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests pass reliably, with no flakiness.
Method: Suite re-run N times within tiered wall-clock budgets (unit to e2e); tests failing non-deterministically across runs flagged; guarded tests retried when #if guards detected.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 1 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with edge-control-points.mjs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D16 · Bus Factor8.4 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").
Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.
15 source file(s) have their living knowledge concentrated in one author (≥90% of recent, decayed contribution). The largest is src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs. Counted over 97 of the 222 production source files in this repository: 117 are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over, and the remaining 8 have no attributable history left to measure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 · ×3
Further sole-owners (lower concentration)
What to do
Resolve the 3 Off-boarding risk finding(s) in Bus Factor. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Further sole-owners (lower concentration) finding(s) in Bus Factor. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Every README, docs/ document and root guide parsed by its markup and measured in Unicode letters. Published: a runnable or packaged .NET project whose README (or a document it links, or a root guide) shows no example, and a root README naming none of three or more projects. Overview, licence, boilerplate, wall-of-text, empty-section and XML-doc rows are measured and withheld (counted in gaps) after adjudication. Deterministic, exhaustive, advisory.
1 of 1 build units (npm) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 1 High secret finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
52 finding(s): 0 critical, 19 high, 27 medium, 6 low. 15 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 15 file(s) — `documentation/demos/circle-layout/index.html` (line 1), `documentation/demos/concentric-layout/index.html` (line 1), `documentation/demos/cose-bilkent-layout-compound/index.html` (line 1), `documentation/demos/cose-bilkent-layout/index.html` (line 1), `documentation/demos/cose-layout/index.html` (line 1), … (+10 more) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 1 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing. The engine-authored rules could not read part of the checkout — `watchdog-identifier-read-out-of-scope-js` could not read 1 path(s) (`debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js`) — so no absence of their rows there is evidence of anything.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
+ 3 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 15 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (15 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
Resolve the 3 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 2 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 1 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with drawing-shapes.mjs. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
+ 1 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the repository publishes a coordinated-vulnerability-disclosure policy (SECURITY.md or security.txt) with a reporting contact, so finders know how to report a vulnerability. Presence of a policy file with a contact, not whether the policy is adequate or honoured.
Method: Vulnerability-disclosure policy read deterministically from the repo: a SECURITY.md (root/.github/docs) or .well-known/security.txt / security.txt, regex-checked for a reporting contact (email / URL / mailto). Present + contact → 10; present without a contact → 4; NotApplicable when no policy file exists (it may live off-repo). Detects the policy file's presence + contact, not its adequacy.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC1 · Text alternatives1.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.
A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content. (×4) — debug/webgl/upscaler.html:125, debug/webgl/upscaler.html:131, debug/webgl/upscaler.html:137, …
What to do
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC2 · Forms & labels5.3 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.
Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it. (×13) — REDACTED:69, REDACTED:123, REDACTED:149, …
What to do
Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC3 · Page structure4.2 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). (×4) — REDACTED:2, debug/memory.html:2, REDACTED:2, …
No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. (×4) — REDACTED:2, debug/memory.html:2, REDACTED:2, …
user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta. (×4) — REDACTED:6, debug/memory.html:6, REDACTED:6, …
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don't jump levels — increase by at most one. — debug/webgl/upscaler.html:124
What to do
Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
`button` sets color: white on background-color: #4285f4 — 3.6:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them. — debug/webgl/upscaler.html:7
`button` sets color: #fff on background-color: #FC4C4C — 3.3:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them. — documentation/demos/tokyo-railways/style.css:33
`button` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — documentation/demos/tokyo-railways/style.css:41
`*` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — documentation/css/style.css:2
`.fa-spin` moves (`animation: fa-spin 2s infinite linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — documentation/css/font-awesome.css:94
`.fa-pulse` moves (`animation: fa-spin 1s infinite steps(8)`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — documentation/css/font-awesome.css:98
`).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. (×5) — snippets/images.js:130, documentation/demos/images-breadthfirst-layout/code.js:128, debug/tests.js:473, …
`node.animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. (×2) — debug/webgl/init.js:102, debug/webgl/init.js:111
`n.animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — debug/webgl/init.js:258
What to do
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an a11y linter that can read your UI — no component framework was detected, so the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins would have nothing to lint; use an HTML-template a11y linter (html-eslint, htmlhint) or run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 5 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add an a11y linter that can read your UI — no component framework was detected, so the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins would have nothing to lint; use an HTML-template a11y linter (html-eslint, htmlhint) or run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, then assert with @axe-core/playwright in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions whose whole body still throws a "not implemented" error, and placeholder text (lorem ipsum, changeme/replace_me…) left in strings and JSX of non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions that only throw a "not implemented" error, functions that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, async functions that never await, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead. — src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:545
What to do
Clear the softer debt: re-enable or delete skipped tests, decide whether each empty function is a deliberate no-op (and say so in a comment), and replace blanket `eslint-disable` / `@ts-nocheck` with targeted, justified suppressions.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/javascript`, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 10170 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner. — REDACTED:2
What to do
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/javascript`, or eslint-plugin-security — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Readiness · Performance — Whether the code protects its performance with benchmarks — a benchmark suite, allocation/memory measurement, and (ideally) a CI gate. Presence is credited as a bonus, never a deduction.
Method: Repo + source scan: BenchmarkDotNet referenced (csproj/source), [Benchmark]/[MemoryDiagnoser] attribute counts, and a benchmark step in CI; off .NET, the same ladder over Go testing.B, Rust criterion/#[bench]/divan, JMH/kotlinx-benchmark, pytest-benchmark/asv/pyperf, tinybench/mitata/vitest bench/benchmark.js and Swift package-benchmark — scored as a bonus ladder (absence is neutral, never a deduction). Deterministic, presence detection.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R1 · Type Safety0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How much of the frontend is typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript.
Method: Frontend file inventory: the share of typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript across the source tree. Deterministic, exhaustive over frontend files.
0 typed · 234 plain JS — the untyped files are debug/FileSaver.js, debug/add-remove.js, debug/bind.js, debug/compound.js, debug/filter.js, debug/init.js (+228 more).
What to do
Adopt TypeScript for the frontend: add a typecheck step to the build, then either type-check the existing JavaScript in place (`checkJs`/JSDoc types) or convert the highest-traffic modules first — no file is typed today, so this is an adoption, not a clean-up.
React / JS · Code Health — Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm over JS/TS tokens, D-386): a block is reported only where its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or were renamed as they were pasted but kept most of their constants, and where the copies carry enough code to stand on their own or the copied extent reaches 30 lines — so a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are both found and deliberately not reported, and a clean R10 is not a claim that nothing was copied.
Method: Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm run over JS/TS tokens). Masking finds the candidates; a block is reported when its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or when a renamed copy still agrees on most of its constants, AND the copies carry enough code to stand on their own — or when the copied extent reaches 30 lines. So a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are deliberately not counted. Deterministic.
6 duplicated blocks under src/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories collection, core, extensions — 4 of them are reported below, and 2 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 6 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 6 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 6 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — src/collection/data.mjs:5
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:126 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:220 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:126
src/selector/expressions.mjs:235 · src/selector/expressions.mjs:302 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/selector/expressions.mjs:235
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:115 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:516 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 346 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:115
src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:43 · src/collection/algorithms/markov-clustering.mjs:28 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 388 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:43
src/collection/data.mjs:5 · src/core/data.mjs:3 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 148 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/collection/data.mjs:5
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:507 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:550 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:507
debug/tests.js:578 · debug/tests.js:614 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — debug/tests.js:578
src/core/viewport.mjs:122 · src/core/viewport.mjs:171 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 132 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/core/viewport.mjs:122
src/extensions/layout/circle.mjs:16 · src/extensions/layout/grid.mjs:16 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it. — src/extensions/layout/circle.mjs:16
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:403 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:429 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:403
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:311 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:477 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:311
src/math.mjs:499 · src/math.mjs:529 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/math.mjs:499
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:253 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:373 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:253
src/extensions/layout/preset.mjs:9 · src/extensions/layout/random.mjs:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — src/extensions/layout/preset.mjs:9
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:323 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:342 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:323
src/collection/events.mjs:6 · src/core/events.mjs:6 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/collection/events.mjs:6
debug/bind.js:15 · debug/bind.js:54 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — debug/bind.js:15
debug/tests.js:478 · debug/tests.js:537 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — debug/tests.js:478
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:24 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:45 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:24
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:130 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:160 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:130
debug/tests.js:1040 · debug/tests.js:1179 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — debug/tests.js:1040
src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:189 · src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:278 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:189
src/collection/filter.mjs:108 · src/collection/filter.mjs:138 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 107 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/collection/filter.mjs:108
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:86 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:103 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:86
debug/view.js:134 · debug/view.js:154 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — debug/view.js:134
src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:794 · src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1720 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:794
src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:869 · src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1897 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:869
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:200 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:235 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:200
src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:220 · src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:23 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 71 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:220
src/define/animation.mjs:43 · src/define/animation.mjs:57 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/define/animation.mjs:43
src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:18 · src/extensions/layout/concentric.mjs:23 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 84 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:18
src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:138 · src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:439 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:138
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:521 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:542 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:521
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/webgl-util.mjs:10 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 123 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167
src/math.mjs:24 · src/math.mjs:38 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/math.mjs:24
debug/tests.js:359 · debug/tests.js:1122 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — debug/tests.js:359
debug/tests.js:961 · debug/tests.js:986 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — debug/tests.js:961
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:140 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:291 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:140
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/misc-upscaler.js:95 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 62 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167
What to do
Act on each finding's own remediation rather than one rule: the move depends on what recurs. Where the copies are executable blocks, give the shared part one home and call it from each site; where they are declarations, a listing, a specialisation already delegating to its base, or one shape repeated per entity, there is no call site and the move is a shared type, a generated set or a factory — sometimes there is nothing to extract.
React / JS · Code Health — Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from the token-level function scanner (D-386) — real branching, not a regex heuristic.
Method: Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from a token-level function scanner (real branching, not a regex heuristic), computed over every frontend function. Deterministic.
parseImpl has cyclomatic complexity 113 and cognitive complexity 182; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:61
touchmoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 96 and cognitive complexity 168; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1437
render has cyclomatic complexity 90 and cognitive complexity 91; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:278
getAllInBox has cyclomatic complexity 65 and cognitive complexity 161; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:322
mousemoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 64 and cognitive complexity 127; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:566
boundingBoxImpl has cyclomatic complexity 64 and cognitive complexity 125; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:492
findEndpoints has cyclomatic complexity 60 and cognitive complexity 98; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:54
drawText has cyclomatic complexity 58 and cognitive complexity 106; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:180
findEdgeControlPoints has cyclomatic complexity 48 and cognitive complexity 61; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:718
drawOutline has cyclomatic complexity 45 and cognitive complexity 76; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:336
getElement has cyclomatic complexity 44 and cognitive complexity 51; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:101
mouseupHandler has cyclomatic complexity 43 and cognitive complexity 80; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:834
restore has cyclomatic complexity 42 and cognitive complexity 89; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/collection/index.mjs:350
applyParsedProperty has cyclomatic complexity 42 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/style/apply.mjs:409
touchendHandler has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1856
findTaxiPoints has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 54; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:310
Element has cyclomatic complexity 36 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/collection/element.mjs:6
affinityPropagation has cyclomatic complexity 34 and cognitive complexity 64; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:152
dataImpl has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 72; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/define/data.mjs:29
drawInscribedImage has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:18
What to do
Break down the listed branch-heavy functions; aim P95 cyclomatic ≤ 5.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R3 · Large Files5.7 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How many source files exceed the large-file threshold.
Method: Components/modules exceeding the large-file threshold, counted exhaustively across the frontend source tree. Deterministic.
src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs has 1662 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1
src/math.mjs has 1179 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/math.mjs:1
debug/tests.js has 1111 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — debug/tests.js:1
src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs has 1098 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs has 962 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs has 847 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:1
src/style/properties.mjs has 840 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/style/properties.mjs:1
src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs has 832 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:1
src/style/apply.mjs has 666 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/style/apply.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs has 664 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:1
src/collection/index.mjs has 638 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/collection/index.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs has 567 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs has 535 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs has 527 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs has 514 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs has 495 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs has 482 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs has 469 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:1
src/core/viewport.mjs has 468 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/core/viewport.mjs:1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs has 419 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:1
What to do
Split each oversized file along the responsibilities already in it, into smaller focused modules in the same package.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R4 · Test Coverage8.7 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Static test reachability (D-386): the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything.
Method: Static test reachability: the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything. Deterministic.
No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one. (×25) — debug/tests.js:1, src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:1, debug/webgl/init.js:1, …
What to do
Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).
React / JS · Readiness — How outdated the npm dependencies are (a maturity signal). JS/npm CVEs are scored separately in D30 (JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities).
Method: npm dependency staleness from manifest/registry metadata (a maturity signal; JS/npm CVEs are scored separately in D30, which answers dependency vulnerabilities for every ecosystem). Deterministic.
What to do
Bump outdated dependencies to current versions to limit upgrade debt.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R6 · Tooling6.7 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Whether the project wires up test, lint and typecheck — detected from each package.json script's COMMAND (eslint / tsc / vitest / jest / playwright), not just its name, and corroborated against CI-workflow invocations so a tool run only in CI still counts.
Method: package.json scanned for test/lint/typecheck script wiring. Deterministic presence check.
test ✓ · lint ✓ · typecheck ✗ — read from this repository's package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: `test` for the suite, `lint` or `prettier` for linting, `typecheck`/`type-check`/`tsc` for type checking. ✗ therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline — a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A ✓ means the wiring is DECLARED — a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite.
What to do
Add type checking (adopt TypeScript, or type-check the existing JavaScript with `checkJs`) as package.json scripts and run them in CI.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R7 · Dead Code8.2 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — Files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point, and exports nothing imports (module-graph reachability, D-386).
Method: Dead code: files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point plus exports nothing imports, via module-graph reachability. Deterministic, exhaustive over the import graph.
Unreachable from the 23 application, 5 tooling and 47 test entry point(s) detected in this repo. Gate removals on `npm run build` — an undetected custom entry would make these reachable.
no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make (×6) — snippets/images.js, snippets/visual.js, snippets/animated-bfs.js, …
Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal. (×24) — src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:10, src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/webgl-util.mjs:138, src/is.mjs:17, …
Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in src/util/index.mjs, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in src/util/index.mjs in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists. (×4) — src/util/maps.mjs:5, src/util/maps.mjs:16, src/util/maps.mjs:80, …
This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module — not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it. (×3) — playwright-tests/renderer.spec.js:3, rollup.config.mjs:41, test/modules/util.mjs:5
What to do
Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value.
React / JS · Readiness — npm dependency truthfulness (D-386): unused dependencies, imports not declared anywhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps.
Method: npm dependency truthfulness: unused dependencies, imports declared nowhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps — from the manifest + import graph. Deterministic.
React / JS · Architecture — Import cycles in the module graph (D-386) — files that can only be understood and changed together.
Method: Import cycles in the module graph, detected exhaustively over JS/TS imports (the same cycle detection as the .NET coupling dimension). Deterministic.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped2.2 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`(name)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — debug/notify.js:8
`(descr)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — debug/notify.js:9
``${network.desc} (${network.nodes} nodes, ${network.edges} edges)`` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — debug/webgl/init.js:193
What to do
Each finding names the expression, the attribute it lands in and the line. Confirm the value's origin from the read this analyzer traced, then escape it at the sink or validate it against the shape the attribute accepts before interpolating.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. (×2) — src/extensions/renderer/base/index.mjs:203, src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:49
What to do
Swallowed exception (empty catch)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 13 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (24%; ≈26% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 42 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — 5 observation(s) recorded · Dependency currency not established — this repository declares no production dependency to grade
Not evidenced — 1 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 62 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No interactive element found in the parsed markup — AC4 not applicable here.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's JavaScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
AX2 Stateful singletons — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entity, a Mongoose schema, a Sequelize or Drizzle table, a Knex migration or a Prisma model — and no database or data-store client in the source either, so this repository keeps no data at rest for these controls to protect. If it does persist personal data (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the controls belong to wherever that data is stored.
C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — this repository stands up no server (no Express, Fastify, Koa, Hono, NestJS or similar app, no Next.js/SvelteKit/Nuxt server route, no edge function), creates no Supabase tables and talks to no hosted backend. Access control is therefore N/A here — a browser application or library is authorized by the server it calls, not by itself; a client-side route guard hides a page and authorizes nothing. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entity, a Mongoose schema, a Sequelize or Drizzle table, a Knex migration or a Prisma model — and no database or data-store client in the source either, so this repository keeps no sensitive data whose changes an audit trail would record. If it does (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the trail belongs to wherever that data is stored.
C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entity, a Mongoose schema, a Sequelize or Drizzle table, a Knex migration or a Prisma model — and no database or data-store client in the source either, so this repository keeps no personal data whose lifetime a retention limit would bound. If it does (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the limit belongs wherever that data is stored.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entity, a Mongoose schema, a Sequelize or Drizzle table, a Knex migration or a Prisma model — and no database or data-store client in the source either, so this repository keeps no personal data for a data subject to erase, export or consent over. If it does (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the rights are served wherever that data is stored.
D14 License Compliance — Vendored third-party code's licences not graded — D14 grades declared npm dependencies only
D17 Explicit Debt — explicit-debt markers are read through a C# workspace today, so they were not read for this repository's language — this asserts nothing about how many markers the code carries. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
D21 Naming Consistency — Naming consistency is measured on C# only; JavaScript, html not measured.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ sibling projects each declaring an entity of their own or taking another project's integration events. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No hand-written C# or Visual Basic source; comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.html,.js,.mjs), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D34 Knowledge Freshness — knowledge concentrated in recent work — freshness signal contradicted by repo activity
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D4 Code Duplication — Duplication not measured — .html not exposed to the token comparison
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D5 Coupling — Not applicable — this npm build ships 1 production module(s), so there is no coupling BETWEEN modules to measure. (Its test and non-production modules are not part of the shipped graph.)
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the repository root runs mocha but declares no coverage provider, so the suite can run and still produce no lcov — add `c8` (or `nyc`) as a devDependency so the suite can be wrapped for coverage. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P2 Observability — This repository's JavaScript/TypeScript source (1 module(s), 190 file(s) read) declares no entry point and bootstraps no server, and nothing here deploys a service — it is a library, run inside whatever hosts it, so production observability (structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks) is N/A. If it grows a binary or a service, the dimension reactivates.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JavaScript/TypeScript source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `bun test --coverage --coverage-reporter=lcov`, or `nyc`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript runs on a garbage-collected runtime that gives a program no allocation-control idiom to choose on a hot path — no pools, stack allocation or value types — so allocation awareness is not something this code can be rated on.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Not applicable: this repository declares no async functions, so there is no asynchronous code for a blocking call to stall.
R11 Import Boundaries — No recognizable feature-sliced/layered src layout — boundary rules not applicable.
S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: 187 JavaScript/TypeScript file(s) were read for weak hashes and ciphers, key material fixed in the source, disabled TLS certificate validation and obsolete TLS versions, and none was found. That half of the dimension is clean, but it is not scored on its own: a C# repository with the same clean reading is scored on its server controls as well, or is N/A for having no web surface, and neither can be decided here. The server controls — HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, cookie flags, input validation — are NOT assessed for JavaScript/TypeScript: each is scored as an absence, an absence is only reportable over the production HTTP server, and in this ecosystem the file that opens the port is build output or a framework launcher rather than a file in the source tree. Their absence here is not a finding about this repository.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check asks whether an argument guard reports an EMPTY value as a NULL one, which needs a language that throws a null-specific argument exception — .NET's ArgumentNullException, the JVM's NullPointerException, Dart's ArgumentError.notNull. This repository contains none of those languages: the ones it is written in have a single exception for a bad argument, so there is no pair of exceptions to confuse and nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — Not applicable: this check looks for a collection written by a callback on one thread while the body waiting on it touches it on another, and in this repository's languages no collection is reachable from two threads at once. TypeScript/JavaScript runs every callback on the one thread that owns its objects: a callback runs only when the body waiting on it has yielded, never alongside it, and a worker thread receives a COPY of what it is sent. A SharedArrayBuffer carries raw bytes, never an Array, Map or Set, so no collection is reachable from two threads at once. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — Not applicable: this check looks for a loop whose body adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is walking, invalidating the enumerator it holds, and in this repository's languages that cannot happen. JavaScript and TypeScript have no iterator that a change can invalidate: an `Array` is walked by index against its live length, and a `Map` or `Set` by the ECMAScript specification's live entry list, so a body that adds to, removes from or empties what it walks raises nothing — every loop form (`for…of`, `for…in`, `forEach`, `map`, `filter`, `reduce`, `entries()`) on every built-in collection (`Array`, `Map`, `Set`, plain objects, `URLSearchParams`, `Headers`, `FormData`) runs to completion. Such a loop can still skip an element or never end, which is a different defect and not the one this check asks about. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X5 Nullable reference types — Not applicable: this check asks whether the null-typed discipline a language offers is switched on, and how much of that the assertion operator takes back, and in this repository's languages there is no such switch and no such operator. Plain JavaScript carries no type annotations and commits no tsconfig, so it states no null-typed discipline for this check to grade: there is nothing here that switches null checking on or off, and TypeScript (or `// @ts-check`) is how a repository acquires one — advice, not a defect this card measures. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
AC2 · Forms & labels· <select> without a programmatic label · ×13
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:69— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:123— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:149— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:160— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:217— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:227— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:86— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:90— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:133— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:146— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:164— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:182— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<select> without a programmatic label REDACTED:199— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<html> without a lang REDACTED:2— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
<html> without a lang debug/memory.html:2— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
<html> without a lang REDACTED:2— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
<html> without a lang playwright-page/index.html:2— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
Viewport restricts zoom REDACTED:6— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
Viewport restricts zoom debug/memory.html:6— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
Viewport restricts zoom REDACTED:6— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
Viewport restricts zoom playwright-page/index.html:6— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
R4 · Test Coverage· No test reaches this file · ×25
No test reaches this file debug/tests.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/webgl/init.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/init.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/misc-upscaler.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/view.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/FileSaver.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file snippets/images.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file update-imports.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/add-remove.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file snippets/visual.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/bind.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/webgl/networks.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file snippets/animated-bfs.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file snippets/performance-tuning.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/compound.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file license-update.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/toggles.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/filter.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/layout.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/notify.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file REDACTED:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/style.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file src/cjs.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
FunctionTooLong: load-listeners.BRp.load src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:101— FunctionTooLong — BRp.load runs 1205 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 1105 over it, 12.05× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: parse.styfn.parseImpl REDACTED:61— FunctionTooLong — styfn.parseImpl runs 225 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 125 over it, 2.25× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: breadthfirst.BreadthFirstLayout.run src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:42— FunctionTooLong — BreadthFirstLayout.run runs 217 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 117 over it, 2.17× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: edge-endpoints.BRp.findEndpoints src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:54— FunctionTooLong — BRp.findEndpoints runs 197 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 97 over it, 1.97× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: edge-control-points.BRp.findEdgeControlPoints src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:718— FunctionTooLong — BRp.findEdgeControlPoints runs 195 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 95 over it, 1.95× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: index.CanvasRenderer src/extensions/renderer/canvas/index.mjs:46— FunctionTooLong — CanvasRenderer runs 183 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 83 over it, 1.83× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: bounds.boundingBoxImpl src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:492— FunctionTooLong — boundingBoxImpl runs 182 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 82 over it, 1.82× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: coords.BRp.getAllInBox src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:322— FunctionTooLong — BRp.getAllInBox runs 163 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 63 over it, 1.63× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: coords.BRp.findNearestElements src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:80— FunctionTooLong — BRp.findNearestElements runs 159 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.59× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: drawing-label-text.CRp.drawText src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:180— FunctionTooLong — CRp.drawText runs 159 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.59× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: labels.BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:102— FunctionTooLong — BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections runs 134 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 34 over it, 1.34× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: bounds.updateBoundsFromLabel src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:268— FunctionTooLong — updateBoundsFromLabel runs 132 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 32 over it, 1.32× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: index.elesfn.restore src/collection/index.mjs:350— FunctionTooLong — elesfn.restore runs 128 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 28 over it, 1.28× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: grid.GridLayout.run src/extensions/layout/grid.mjs:30— FunctionTooLong — GridLayout.run runs 128 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 28 over it, 1.28× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: edge-control-points.BRp.findTaxiPoints src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:310— FunctionTooLong — BRp.findTaxiPoints runs 122 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.22× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: drawing-images.CRp.drawInscribedImage src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:18— FunctionTooLong — CRp.drawInscribedImage runs 118 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.18× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: properties.styfn.getDefaultProperties src/style/properties.mjs:607— FunctionTooLong — styfn.getDefaultProperties runs 113 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 13 over it, 1.13× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: cose.createLayoutInfo src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:278— FunctionTooLong — createLayoutInfo runs 107 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 7 over it, 1.07× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: index.Core src/core/index.mjs:19— FunctionTooLong — Core runs 106 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 6 over it, 1.06× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: ele-texture-cache.ETCp.getElement src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:101— FunctionTooLong — ETCp.getElement runs 102 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2 over it, 1.02× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: affinity-propagation.affinityPropagation src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:152— FunctionTooLong — affinityPropagation runs 101 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 1 over it, 1.01× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
No assertions: should fire the `lock` event test/collection-position-and-dimensions.mjs:182— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: ani.pause() then ani.play() test/collection-style.mjs:983— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: loads elements and style via promises with style off test/core-init.mjs:215— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: loads only style via promise test/core-init.mjs:238— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: loads empty graph test/core-init.mjs:259— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: loads empty elements object test/core-init.mjs:271— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: does not throw when setting a bypass at init (headless) test/core-init.mjs:314— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: binds to one event test/events.mjs:346— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: binds with a selector test/events.mjs:389— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: should run a then() callback test/events.mjs:1157— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: calls handler on emit test/modules/emitter.mjs:23— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: calls listener on namespaced emit test/modules/emitter.mjs:29— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: gcd of an array of numbers (all integers) test/modules/math.mjs:81— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: gcd of an array of numbers, including float(s) test/modules/math.mjs:97— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard · ×10
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/css/font-awesome.css:94— `.fa-spin` moves (`animation: fa-spin 2s infinite linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/css/font-awesome.css:98— `.fa-pulse` moves (`animation: fa-spin 1s infinite steps(8)`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard snippets/images.js:130— `).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard documentation/demos/images-breadthfirst-layout/code.js:128— `).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js:473— `).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js:593— `).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/tests.js:629— `).animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js:102— `node.animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js:111— `node.animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard debug/webgl/init.js:258— `n.animate()` moves (`Web Animations API keyframes`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
FileTooLong: base/load-listeners.mjs src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs— FileTooLong — 1264 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 764 over it, 2.53× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: src/math.mjs src/math.mjs— FileTooLong — 896 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 396 over it, 1.79× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs— FileTooLong — 689 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 189 over it, 1.38× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs— FileTooLong — 680 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 97% of them inside a single declaration: ElementDrawingWebGL (44-1156). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 180 over it, 1.36× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: dimensions/bounds.mjs src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs— FileTooLong — 674 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 174 over it, 1.35× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: layout/cose.mjs src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs— FileTooLong — 625 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 125 over it, 1.25× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: style/properties.mjs src/style/properties.mjs— FileTooLong — 622 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 75% of them inside a single declaration: styfn (5-601). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 122 over it, 1.24× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs— FileTooLong — 530 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 71% of them inside a single declaration: CRp (9-579). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 30 over it, 1.06× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
load::touchmoveHandler (cognitive 168) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1437— load::touchmoveHandler has cognitive complexity 168 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 55 (132 pts), boolean chains 27, loops 4 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 82). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
load::mousemoveHandler (cognitive 127) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:566— load::mousemoveHandler has cognitive complexity 127 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 41 (109 pts), boolean chains 18 (nesting depth added 68). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
load::mouseupHandler (cognitive 80) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:834— load::mouseupHandler has cognitive complexity 80 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 33 (72 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 39). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
load::touchendHandler (cognitive 66) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1856— load::touchendHandler has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 37 (62 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 25). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load::touchstartHandler (cognitive 44) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1246— load::touchstartHandler has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 22 (38 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load::mousedownHandler (cognitive 23) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:411— load::mousedownHandler has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (22 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load::touchmoveHandler (cyclomatic 96) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1437— load::touchmoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 96 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load::mousemoveHandler (cyclomatic 64) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:566— load::mousemoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 64 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load::mouseupHandler (cyclomatic 43) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:834— load::mouseupHandler has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load::touchendHandler (cyclomatic 39) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1856— load::touchendHandler has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load::touchstartHandler (cyclomatic 31) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1246— load::touchstartHandler has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AC1 · Text alternatives· <canvas> without a text alternative · ×4
<canvas> without a text alternative debug/webgl/upscaler.html:125— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
<canvas> without a text alternative debug/webgl/upscaler.html:131— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
<canvas> without a text alternative debug/webgl/upscaler.html:137— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
<canvas> without a text alternative debug/webgl/upscaler.html:143— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
AC3 · Page structure· Page without a main landmark · ×4
Page without a main landmark REDACTED:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark debug/memory.html:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark REDACTED:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark debug/webgl/upscaler.html:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) debug/bind.js:15— debug/bind.js:15 · debug/bind.js:54 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) debug/tests.js:478— debug/tests.js:478 · debug/tests.js:537 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:24— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:24 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:45 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:130— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:130 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:160 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) debug/view.js:134— debug/view.js:134 · debug/view.js:154 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:794— src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:794 · src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1720 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:869— src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:869 · src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1897 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:200— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:200 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:235 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) src/define/animation.mjs:43— src/define/animation.mjs:43 · src/define/animation.mjs:57 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:138— src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:138 · src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:439 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:521— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:521 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:542 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2 locations) src/math.mjs:24— src/math.mjs:24 · src/math.mjs:38 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) debug/tests.js:1040— debug/tests.js:1040 · debug/tests.js:1179 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:189— src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:189 · src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:278 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:86— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:86 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:103 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×3
Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines × 2 locations) src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:220— src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:220 · src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:23 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 71 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:18— src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:18 · src/extensions/layout/concentric.mjs:23 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 84 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/webgl-util.mjs:10 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 123 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) debug/tests.js:359— debug/tests.js:359 · debug/tests.js:1122 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) debug/tests.js:961— debug/tests.js:961 · debug/tests.js:986 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:140— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:140 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:291 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped· Untrusted text written into markup unescaped · ×3
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped debug/notify.js:8— `(name)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped debug/notify.js:9— `(descr)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped debug/webgl/init.js:193— ``${network.desc} (${network.nodes} nodes, ${network.edges} edges)`` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Focus outline removed in CSS without a · ×2
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement documentation/demos/tokyo-railways/style.css:41— `button` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement documentation/css/style.css:2— `*` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Deprecated: eslint package.json:125— eslint 9.39.4, declared in package.json, is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options.". Replace it with the package or version that message names, or record why this one must stay.
Deprecated: rimraf package.json:139— rimraf 3.0.2, declared in package.json, is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Rimraf versions prior to v4 are no longer supported". Replace it with the package or version that message names, or record why this one must stay.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:311— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:311 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:477 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2 locations) src/math.mjs:499— src/math.mjs:499 · src/math.mjs:529 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/layout/preset.mjs:9— src/extensions/layout/preset.mjs:9 · src/extensions/layout/random.mjs:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:323— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:323 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:342 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) src/extensions/renderer/base/index.mjs:203— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:49— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
AC3 · Page structure· Heading level jumps from h1 to h3 · ×1
Heading level jumps from h1 to h3 debug/webgl/upscaler.html:124— Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don't jump levels — increase by at most one.
Low contrast colour pair in CSS (3.6:1) debug/webgl/upscaler.html:7— `button` sets color: white on background-color: #4285f4 — 3.6:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them.
Low contrast colour pair in CSS (3.3:1) documentation/demos/tokyo-railways/style.css:33— `button` sets color: #fff on background-color: #FC4C4C — 3.3:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them.
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (an a11y linter that can read your UI — no component framework was detected, so the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins would have nothing to lint; use an HTML-template a11y linter (html-eslint, htmlhint) or run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 5 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
parse.styfn.parseImpl (cyclomatic 115) REDACTED:61— parse.styfn.parseImpl has cyclomatic complexity 115 (threshold 15). Of this number, 113 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-redraw.CRp.render (cyclomatic 102) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:278— drawing-redraw.CRp.render has cyclomatic complexity 102 (threshold 15). Of this number, 90 points are the body's own statements and 12 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
coords.BRp.getAllInBox (cyclomatic 70) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:322— coords.BRp.getAllInBox has cyclomatic complexity 70 (threshold 15). Of this number, 65 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
bounds.boundingBoxImpl (cyclomatic 64) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:492— bounds.boundingBoxImpl has cyclomatic complexity 64 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
breadthfirst.BreadthFirstLayout.run (cyclomatic 61) src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:42— breadthfirst.BreadthFirstLayout.run has cyclomatic complexity 61 (threshold 15). Of this number, 27 points are the body's own statements and 34 belong to 12 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
findEndpoints (cyclomatic 60) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:54— findEndpoints has cyclomatic complexity 60 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-label-text.CRp.drawText (cyclomatic 58) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:180— drawing-label-text.CRp.drawText has cyclomatic complexity 58 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
edge-control-points.BRp.findEdgeControlPoints (cyclomatic 49) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:718— edge-control-points.BRp.findEdgeControlPoints has cyclomatic complexity 49 (threshold 15). Of this number, 48 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ele-texture-cache.ETCp.getElement (cyclomatic 46) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:101— ele-texture-cache.ETCp.getElement has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). Of this number, 44 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawOutline (cyclomatic 45) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:336— drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawOutline has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
apply.styfn.applyParsedProperty (cyclomatic 44) src/style/apply.mjs:409— apply.styfn.applyParsedProperty has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15). Of this number, 42 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.elesfn.restore (cyclomatic 42) src/collection/index.mjs:350— index.elesfn.restore has cyclomatic complexity 42 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load-listeners.BRp.load (cyclomatic 41) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:101— load-listeners.BRp.load has cyclomatic complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
grid.GridLayout.run (cyclomatic 40) src/extensions/layout/grid.mjs:30— grid.GridLayout.run has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). Of this number, 30 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
edge-control-points.BRp.findTaxiPoints (cyclomatic 39) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:310— edge-control-points.BRp.findTaxiPoints has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). Of this number, 37 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
layered-texture-cache.LTCp.getLayers (cyclomatic 37) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs:106— layered-texture-cache.LTCp.getLayers has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). Of this number, 21 points are the body's own statements and 16 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
element.Element (cyclomatic 36) src/collection/element.mjs:6— element.Element has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
hierholzer (cyclomatic 36) src/collection/algorithms/hierholzer.mjs:10— hierholzer has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). Of this number, 20 points are the body's own statements and 16 belong to 9 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
affinity-propagation.affinityPropagation (cyclomatic 34) src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:152— affinity-propagation.affinityPropagation has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
index.Core (cyclomatic 33) src/core/index.mjs:19— index.Core has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 11 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
bfs-dfs.defineSearch (cyclomatic 32) src/collection/algorithms/bfs-dfs.mjs:3— bfs-dfs.defineSearch has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 32 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 10, 81, 84). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
drawing-images.CRp.drawInscribedImage (cyclomatic 32) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:18— drawing-images.CRp.drawInscribedImage has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
data::dataImpl (cyclomatic 32) src/define/data.mjs:29— data::dataImpl has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
step.step (cyclomatic 31) src/core/animation/step.mjs:6— step.step has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
docmaker.compileConfig (cyclomatic 30) documentation/docmaker.mjs:208— docmaker.compileConfig has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
extension.setExtension (cyclomatic 29) src/extension.mjs:15— extension.setExtension has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). Of this number, 23 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
animation::animationImpl (cyclomatic 27) src/define/animation.mjs:72— animation::animationImpl has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
defineSearch::searchFn (cyclomatic 27) src/collection/algorithms/bfs-dfs.mjs:10— defineSearch::searchFn has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
apply.styfn.updateStyleHints (cyclomatic 26) src/style/apply.mjs:229— apply.styfn.updateStyleHints has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler (cyclomatic 26) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1056— load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (load-listeners.BRp.load) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
index.elesfn.json (cyclomatic 25) src/collection/index.mjs:203— index.elesfn.json has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Of this number, 21 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdgePath (cyclomatic 25) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:210— drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdgePath has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
bounds.updateBoundsFromLabel (cyclomatic 24) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:268— bounds.updateBoundsFromLabel has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
index.elesfn.remove (cyclomatic 24) src/collection/index.mjs:586— index.elesfn.remove has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 17 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
labels.BRp.getLabelText (cyclomatic 24) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:351— labels.BRp.getLabelText has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 23 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
json (cyclomatic 24) src/core/index.mjs:330— json has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 17 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 8 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
data.valCmp (cyclomatic 23) src/selector/data.mjs:3— data.valCmp has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
edge-arrows.BRp.calculateArrowAngles (cyclomatic 23) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-arrows.mjs:5— edge-arrows.BRp.calculateArrowAngles has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
drawing-redraw.CRp.createGradientStyleFor (cyclomatic 23) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:56— drawing-redraw.CRp.createGradientStyleFor has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.CanvasRenderer (cyclomatic 23) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/index.mjs:46— index.CanvasRenderer has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (getLabelRotationOffset, getLabelBox, getSourceLabelBox, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
math.roundRectangleIntersectLine (cyclomatic 22) src/math.mjs:484— math.roundRectangleIntersectLine has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
concentric.ConcentricLayout.run (cyclomatic 22) src/extensions/layout/concentric.mjs:37— concentric.ConcentricLayout.run has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
getFitViewport (cyclomatic 22) src/core/viewport.mjs:235— getFitViewport has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
bellmanFord (cyclomatic 22) src/collection/algorithms/bellman-ford.mjs:14— bellmanFord has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
hierarchical-clustering.mergeClosest (cyclomatic 21) src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:38— hierarchical-clustering.mergeClosest has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.Collection (cyclomatic 21) src/collection/index.mjs:25— index.Collection has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
bypass.styfn.applyBypass (cyclomatic 21) src/style/bypass.mjs:8— bypass.styfn.applyBypass has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
coords.BRp.findNearestElements::checkEdge (cyclomatic 21) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:158— coords.BRp.findNearestElements::checkEdge has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
labels.BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections::calculateEndProjection (cyclomatic 21) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:211— labels.BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections::calculateEndProjection has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode (cyclomatic 21) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:11— drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawOutline) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
betweennessCentrality (cyclomatic 21) src/collection/algorithms/betweenness-centrality.mjs:12— betweennessCentrality has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Of this number, 19 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-label-text.CRp.drawElementText (cyclomatic 20) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:26— drawing-label-text.CRp.drawElementText has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
relativePosition (cyclomatic 20) src/collection/dimensions/position.mjs:204— relativePosition has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
apply.styfn.updateTransitions (cyclomatic 19) src/style/apply.mjs:707— apply.styfn.updateTransitions has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Of this number, 18 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
cose.createLayoutInfo (cyclomatic 19) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:278— cose.createLayoutInfo has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
cose.findClippingPoint (cyclomatic 19) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:862— cose.findClippingPoint has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
rendered-style.BRp.recalculateRenderedStyle (cyclomatic 19) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/rendered-style.mjs:81— rendered-style.BRp.recalculateRenderedStyle has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
colors.hsl2tuple (cyclomatic 18) REDACTED:26— colors.hsl2tuple has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
bounds.elesfn.updateCompoundBounds::update::computePaddingValues (cyclomatic 18) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:119— bounds.elesfn.updateCompoundBounds::update::computePaddingValues has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.elesfn.move (cyclomatic 18) src/collection/index.mjs:748— index.elesfn.move has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
cose.CoseLayout.run (cyclomatic 18) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:126— cose.CoseLayout.run has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (frame, mainLoop, done, …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
drawing-edges.CRp.drawArrowShape (cyclomatic 18) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:383— drawing-edges.CRp.drawArrowShape has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
drawing-redraw-webgl.renderWebgl (cyclomatic 18) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs:501— drawing-redraw-webgl.renderWebgl has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
viewport (cyclomatic 18) src/core/viewport.mjs:424— viewport has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
bounds.cachedBoundingBoxImpl (cyclomatic 17) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:831— bounds.cachedBoundingBoxImpl has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
apply.styfn.getPropertiesDiff (cyclomatic 17) src/style/apply.mjs:49— apply.styfn.getPropertiesDiff has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
getZoomedViewport (cyclomatic 17) src/core/viewport.mjs:335— getZoomedViewport has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
floydWarshall (cyclomatic 17) src/collection/algorithms/floyd-warshall.mjs:12— floydWarshall has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
setupDequeueing (cyclomatic 17) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/texture-cache-defs.mjs:6— setupDequeueing has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 17 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (setupDequeueingImpl::dequeue, setupDequeueingImpl, a function literal at line 17). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
colors.rgb2tuple (cyclomatic 16) REDACTED:84— colors.rgb2tuple has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
switch-functions.defineSwitchFunction (cyclomatic 16) src/collection/switch-functions.mjs:5— switch-functions.defineSwitchFunction has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 6). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
step-all.stepAll::stepOne (cyclomatic 16) src/core/animation/step-all.mjs:8— step-all.stepAll::stepOne has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.BRp.notify (cyclomatic 16) src/extensions/renderer/base/index.mjs:120— index.BRp.notify has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdge (cyclomatic 16) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:9— drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdge has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
drawing-redraw.CRp.drawSelectionRectangle (cyclomatic 16) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:633— drawing-redraw.CRp.drawSelectionRectangle has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ElementDrawingWebGL.drawNode (cyclomatic 16) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:732— ElementDrawingWebGL.drawNode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
layoutPositions (cyclomatic 16) src/collection/layout.mjs:41— layoutPositions has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 12 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 8 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
pageRank (cyclomatic 16) src/collection/algorithms/page-rank.mjs:13— pageRank has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
Hotspot: src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:484— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in edge-control-points.BRp.tryToCorrectInvalidPoints at line 484. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-29..2026-10-27, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-29 11:14:49 -04:00' --until='2026-10-27 11:14:49 -04:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
parseImpl (cognitive 185) REDACTED:61— parseImpl has cognitive complexity 185 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 61 (108 pts), boolean chains 38, ternaries 11 (31 pts), loops 4 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 71). Of this number, 182 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
getAllInBox (cognitive 167) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:322— getAllInBox has cognitive complexity 167 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 33 (117 pts), boolean chains 27, loops 5 (22 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 101). Of this number, 161 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
boundingBoxImpl (cognitive 125) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:492— boundingBoxImpl has cognitive complexity 125 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 33 (93 pts), boolean chains 20, loops 1 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (5 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 69). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
drawing-label-text.CRp.drawText (cognitive 106) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:180— drawing-label-text.CRp.drawText has cognitive complexity 106 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 36 (79 pts), match/switch 4 (13 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 1 (3 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 55). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
render (cognitive 106) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:278— render has cognitive complexity 106 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 44 (59 pts), boolean chains 35, ternaries 8 (12 pts) (nesting depth added 19). Of this number, 91 points are the body's own statements and 15 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
findEndpoints (cognitive 98) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:54— findEndpoints has cognitive complexity 98 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 35 (72 pts), boolean chains 12, ternaries 9 (12 pts), other 2 (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.elesfn.restore (cognitive 89) src/collection/index.mjs:350— index.elesfn.restore has cognitive complexity 89 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 32 (67 pts), loops 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 44). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
grid.GridLayout.run (cognitive 89) src/extensions/layout/grid.mjs:30— grid.GridLayout.run has cognitive complexity 89 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (55 pts), loops 6 (21 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 42). Of this number, 62 points are the body's own statements and 27 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
breadthfirst.BreadthFirstLayout.run (cognitive 80) src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:42— breadthfirst.BreadthFirstLayout.run has cognitive complexity 80 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 32 (43 pts), loops 12 (17 pts), ternaries 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 9 (nesting depth added 20). Of this number, 38 points are the body's own statements and 42 belong to 12 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawNode::drawOutline (cognitive 76) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:336— drawNode::drawOutline has cognitive complexity 76 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (46 pts), ternaries 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 2 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 32). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
docmaker.compileConfig (cognitive 74) documentation/docmaker.mjs:208— docmaker.compileConfig has cognitive complexity 74 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (46 pts), loops 5 (19 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 47). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
data::dataImpl (cognitive 72) src/define/data.mjs:29— data::dataImpl has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (52 pts), loops 3 (10 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 39). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
apply.styfn.applyParsedProperty (cognitive 70) src/style/apply.mjs:409— apply.styfn.applyParsedProperty has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 34 (49 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 3 (8 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 22). Of this number, 67 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
bellmanFord (cognitive 70) src/collection/algorithms/bellman-ford.mjs:14— bellmanFord has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (44 pts), loops 7 (23 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 47). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
json (cognitive 68) src/core/index.mjs:330— json has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (54 pts), loops 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 39). Of this number, 40 points are the body's own statements and 28 belong to 8 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
hierholzer (cognitive 68) src/collection/algorithms/hierholzer.mjs:10— hierholzer has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 33 (57 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 25). Of this number, 31 points are the body's own statements and 37 belong to 9 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
betweennessCentrality (cognitive 66) src/collection/algorithms/betweenness-centrality.mjs:12— betweennessCentrality has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (45 pts), loops 9 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 42). Of this number, 64 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
affinity-propagation.affinityPropagation (cognitive 64) src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:152— affinity-propagation.affinityPropagation has cognitive complexity 64 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 22 (39 pts), if/else 7 (19 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 31). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
findEdgeControlPoints (cognitive 62) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:718— findEdgeControlPoints has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (31 pts), boolean chains 19, ternaries 4 (8 pts), loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 19). Of this number, 61 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
step.step (cognitive 60) src/core/animation/step.mjs:6— step.step has cognitive complexity 60 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (51 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
labels.BRp.getLabelText (cognitive 58) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:351— labels.BRp.getLabelText has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (43 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), ternaries 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 32). Of this number, 56 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
findTaxiPoints (cognitive 57) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:310— findTaxiPoints has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (27 pts), ternaries 9 (16 pts), boolean chains 14 (nesting depth added 13). Of this number, 54 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
json (cognitive 55) src/collection/index.mjs:203— json has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (46 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 29). Of this number, 46 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
ele-texture-cache.ETCp.getElement (cognitive 53) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:101— ele-texture-cache.ETCp.getElement has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (31 pts), boolean chains 14, loops 3 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 11). Of this number, 51 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
bfs-dfs.defineSearch (cognitive 49) src/collection/algorithms/bfs-dfs.mjs:3— bfs-dfs.defineSearch has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (24 pts), ternaries 5 (11 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 4 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 21). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 49 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 10, 81, 84). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
layered-texture-cache.LTCp.getLayers (cognitive 46) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs:106— layered-texture-cache.LTCp.getLayers has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 22 (30 pts), boolean chains 11, loops 4 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 9). Of this number, 27 points are the body's own statements and 19 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
setExtension (cognitive 46) src/extension.mjs:15— setExtension has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (29 pts), loops 4 (10 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 17). Of this number, 30 points are the body's own statements and 16 belong to 23 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
defineSearch::searchFn (cognitive 46) src/collection/algorithms/bfs-dfs.mjs:10— defineSearch::searchFn has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (24 pts), ternaries 8 (13 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawInscribedImage (cognitive 45) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:18— drawInscribedImage has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (35 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
relativePosition (cognitive 44) src/collection/dimensions/position.mjs:204— relativePosition has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (21 pts), ternaries 5 (15 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
bypass.styfn.applyBypass (cognitive 43) src/style/bypass.mjs:8— bypass.styfn.applyBypass has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (33 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load-listeners.BRp.load (cognitive 42) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:101— load-listeners.BRp.load has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 146 (288 pts), boolean chains 81, loops 7 (9 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 145). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
index.elesfn.move (cognitive 39) src/collection/index.mjs:748— index.elesfn.move has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (24 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 22). Most of this is not in the body itself: 14 of the 39 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 766, a function literal at line 794, toString). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
index.elesfn.remove (cognitive 38) src/collection/index.mjs:586— index.elesfn.remove has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (26 pts), loops 7 (9 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 12). Of this number, 29 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler (cognitive 38) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1056— load-listeners.BRp.load::wheelHandler has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (33 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (load-listeners.BRp.load) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
getStylePropertyValue (cognitive 38) src/style/get-for-ele.mjs:43— getStylePropertyValue has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (26 pts), ternaries 2 (10 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 23). Of this number, 32 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 5 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
aStar (cognitive 38) src/collection/algorithms/a-star.mjs:16— aStar has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (28 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
hierarchical-clustering.mergeClosest (cognitive 37) src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:38— hierarchical-clustering.mergeClosest has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (27 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity· Element (cognitive 37) · ×1
Element (cognitive 37) src/collection/element.mjs:6— Element has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 11, ternaries 10, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
bounds.updateBoundsFromLabel (cognitive 35) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:268— bounds.updateBoundsFromLabel has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 4 (14 pts), if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
apply.styfn.getPropertiesDiff (cognitive 35) src/style/apply.mjs:49— apply.styfn.getPropertiesDiff has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (22 pts), loops 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdgePath (cognitive 35) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:210— drawing-edges.CRp.drawEdgePath has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), loops 4 (14 pts), match/switch 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AtlasManager.invalidate (cognitive 35) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs:487— AtlasManager.invalidate has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (19 pts), ternaries 2 (11 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
bounds.cachedBoundingBoxImpl (cognitive 34) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:831— bounds.cachedBoundingBoxImpl has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (27 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
labels.BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections::calculateEndProjection (cognitive 34) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:211— labels.BRp.recalculateEdgeLabelProjections::calculateEndProjection has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), ternaries 3 (9 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity· run (cognitive 34) · ×1
run (cognitive 34) src/extensions/layout/concentric.mjs:37— run has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 8 (11 pts), ternaries 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Core (cognitive 33) src/core/index.mjs:19— Core has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (16 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 7, loops 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 19 points are the body's own statements and 14 belong to 7 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
animation::animationImpl (cognitive 33) src/define/animation.mjs:72— animation::animationImpl has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (22 pts), boolean chains 9, match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
createLayoutInfo (cognitive 33) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:278— createLayoutInfo has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 11 (19 pts), if/else 4 (7 pts), ternaries 4 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
switch-functions.defineSwitchFunction (cognitive 32) src/collection/switch-functions.mjs:5— switch-functions.defineSwitchFunction has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (24 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 17). None of this is in the body itself: all 32 points belong to one function literal inside it that branches (line 6). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
string-sheet.styfn.appendFromString (cognitive 32) src/style/string-sheet.mjs:6— string-sheet.styfn.appendFromString has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (27 pts), loops 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 16). Of this number, 28 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-redraw-webgl.renderWebgl (cognitive 32) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs:501— drawing-redraw-webgl.renderWebgl has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (18 pts), loops 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
findNearestElements::addEle (cognitive 32) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:98— findNearestElements::addEle has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), ternaries 2 (9 pts), loops 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
bounds.elesfn.updateCompoundBounds::update::computePaddingValues (cognitive 31) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:119— bounds.elesfn.updateCompoundBounds::update::computePaddingValues has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (23 pts), boolean chains 3, if/else 3, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
apply.styfn.updateStyleHints (cognitive 31) src/style/apply.mjs:229— apply.styfn.updateStyleHints has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 3 (6 pts), loops 4 (nesting depth added 8). Of this number, 27 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
apply.styfn.updateTransitions (cognitive 31) src/style/apply.mjs:707— apply.styfn.updateTransitions has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (21 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 13). Of this number, 28 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawBorder (cognitive 31) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:267— drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawBorder has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), ternaries 3 (10 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
setupDequeueing::setupDequeueingImpl::dequeue (cognitive 30) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/texture-cache-defs.mjs:24— setupDequeueing::setupDequeueingImpl::dequeue has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (21 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
edge-control-points.BRp.storeAllpts (cognitive 29) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:600— edge-control-points.BRp.storeAllpts has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (23 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
floydWarshall (cognitive 29) src/collection/algorithms/floyd-warshall.mjs:12— floydWarshall has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), loops 6 (9 pts), boolean chains 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 12). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
pageRank (cognitive 29) src/collection/algorithms/page-rank.mjs:13— pageRank has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 12 (22 pts), if/else 4 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline.
Collection (cognitive 28) src/collection/index.mjs:25— Collection has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (20 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). Of this number, 26 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
removeData::removeDataImpl (cognitive 28) src/define/data.mjs:154— removeData::removeDataImpl has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), loops 4 (11 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawArrowShape (cognitive 28) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:383— drawArrowShape has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (22 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
colors.hsl2tuple (cognitive 27) REDACTED:26— colors.hsl2tuple has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (21 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 9). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
degreeCentralityNormalized (cognitive 27) src/collection/algorithms/degree-centrality.mjs:12— degreeCentralityNormalized has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (23 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 14). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 12 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
hierarchicalClustering (cognitive 27) src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:236— hierarchicalClustering has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), ternaries 3 (10 pts), loops 4 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
hierarchical-clustering.buildClustersFromTree (cognitive 26) src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs:177— hierarchical-clustering.buildClustersFromTree has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (26 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
k-clustering.kMeans (cognitive 26) src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:161— k-clustering.kMeans has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 5 (12 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
cose.CoseLayout.run (cognitive 26) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:126— cose.CoseLayout.run has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (18 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (frame, mainLoop, done, …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
rendered-style.BRp.recalculateRenderedStyle (cognitive 26) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/rendered-style.mjs:81— rendered-style.BRp.recalculateRenderedStyle has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 3 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
traversing.defineEdgesWithFunction (cognitive 25) src/collection/traversing.mjs:245— traversing.defineEdgesWithFunction has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (15 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). None of this is in the body itself: all 25 points belong to one function literal inside it that branches (line 247). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
edge-arrows.BRp.calculateArrowAngles (cognitive 25) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-arrows.mjs:5— edge-arrows.BRp.calculateArrowAngles has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (22 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
defineEdgesWithFunction::edgesWithImpl (cognitive 25) src/collection/traversing.mjs:247— defineEdgesWithFunction::edgesWithImpl has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (15 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
hopcroftTarjanBiconnected (cognitive 25) src/collection/algorithms/hopcroft-tarjan-biconnected.mjs:1— hopcroftTarjanBiconnected has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (21 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). None of this is in the body itself: all 25 points belong to 9 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 56, biconnectedSearch, a function literal at line 91, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
drawElementText (cognitive 25) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:26— drawElementText has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
colors.rgb2tuple (cognitive 24) REDACTED:84— colors.rgb2tuple has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (17 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
coords.BRp.findNearestElements::checkEdge (cognitive 24) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:158— coords.BRp.findNearestElements::checkEdge has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ElementDrawingWebGL.drawTexture (cognitive 24) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:553— ElementDrawingWebGL.drawTexture has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (19 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
layoutPositions (cognitive 24) src/collection/layout.mjs:41— layoutPositions has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 20 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 8 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
math.finiteLinesIntersect (cognitive 23) src/math.mjs:1150— math.finiteLinesIntersect has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (21 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
k-clustering.kMedoids (cognitive 23) src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs:245— k-clustering.kMedoids has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-redraw.CRp.createGradientStyleFor (cognitive 23) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:56— drawing-redraw.CRp.createGradientStyleFor has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-redraw.CRp.drawSelectionRectangle (cognitive 23) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:633— drawing-redraw.CRp.drawSelectionRectangle has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.CanvasRenderer (cognitive 23) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/index.mjs:46— index.CanvasRenderer has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 7, if/else 6 (7 pts), loops 4, match/switch 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (getLabelRotationOffset, getLabelBox, getSourceLabelBox, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
defineDimFns (cognitive 23) src/collection/dimensions/width-height.mjs:7— defineDimFns has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (18 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). None of this is in the body itself: all 23 points belong to 4 function items inside it that branch (dimImpl, outerDimImpl, renderedDimImpl, …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
step-all.stepAll::stepOne (cognitive 22) src/core/animation/step-all.mjs:8— step-all.stepAll::stepOne has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
math.roundRectangleIntersectLine (cognitive 21) src/math.mjs:484— math.roundRectangleIntersectLine has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
edge-control-points.BRp.tryToCorrectInvalidPoints (cognitive 21) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:484— edge-control-points.BRp.tryToCorrectInvalidPoints has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-elements.CRp.drawCachedElementPortion (cognitive 21) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-elements.mjs:35— drawing-elements.CRp.drawCachedElementPortion has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode (cognitive 21) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:11— drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 71 (109 pts), boolean chains 22, ternaries 6 (13 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), match/switch 2 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 53). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (drawing-nodes.CRp.drawNode::drawBorder) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
ElementDrawingWebGL.drawNode (cognitive 21) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:732— ElementDrawingWebGL.drawNode has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), ternaries 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
add (cognitive 21) src/core/add-remove.mjs:7— add has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), loops 3 (9 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
viewport (cognitive 21) src/core/viewport.mjs:424— viewport has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
applyContextStyle (cognitive 21) src/style/apply.mjs:173— applyContextStyle has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
overrideBypass (cognitive 21) src/style/bypass.mjs:100— overrideBypass has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
renderedPosition (cognitive 21) src/collection/dimensions/position.mjs:167— renderedPosition has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
promise.resolve (cognitive 20) src/promise.mjs:115— promise.resolve has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
trigger (cognitive 20) src/emitter.mjs:176— trigger has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 186, 215). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
findBezierPoints (cognitive 20) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:258— findBezierPoints has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (13 pts), if/else 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
maps.deleteMap (cognitive 19) src/util/maps.mjs:80— maps.deleteMap has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), loops 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
layered-texture-cache.LTCp.dequeue (cognitive 19) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs:548— layered-texture-cache.LTCp.dequeue has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AtlasCollection.gc (cognitive 19) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs:303— AtlasCollection.gc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity· pan (cognitive 19) · ×1
pan (cognitive 19) src/core/viewport.mjs:106— pan has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 9). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
drawEdge (cognitive 19) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:9— drawEdge has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14, boolean chains 3, ternaries 2. Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
parse.parse (cognitive 18) src/selector/parse.mjs:65— parse.parse has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), loops 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ElementDrawingWebGL.drawEdgeLine (cognitive 18) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:913— ElementDrawingWebGL.drawEdgeLine has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (16 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
toggleClass (cognitive 18) src/collection/class.mjs:72— toggleClass has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
shift (cognitive 18) src/collection/dimensions/position.mjs:108— shift has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
math.pointInsidePolygonPoints (cognitive 17) src/math.mjs:826— math.pointInsidePolygonPoints has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
emitter.forEachEvent (cognitive 17) src/emitter.mjs:51— emitter.forEachEvent has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
apply.styfn.cleanElements (cognitive 17) src/style/apply.mjs:667— apply.styfn.cleanElements has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
cose.separateComponents (cognitive 17) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:1264— cose.separateComponents has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (9 pts), loops 5 (7 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
export-image.CRp.bufferCanvasImage (cognitive 17) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/export-image.mjs:16— export-image.CRp.bufferCanvasImage has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
saveAs (cognitive 17) debug/FileSaver.js:136— saveAs has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 12 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
getFitViewport (cognitive 17) src/core/viewport.mjs:235— getFitViewport has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7, boolean chains 5, ternaries 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
getZoomedViewport (cognitive 17) src/core/viewport.mjs:335— getZoomedViewport has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (11 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
kargerStein (cognitive 17) src/collection/algorithms/karger-stein.mjs:76— kargerStein has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), loops 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
boundingBox (cognitive 17) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:903— boundingBox has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
math.median (cognitive 16) src/math.mjs:68— math.median has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
style.defineDerivedStateFunction (cognitive 16) src/collection/style.mjs:352— style.defineDerivedStateFunction has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 357). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
cose.findClippingPoint (cognitive 16) src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:862— cose.findClippingPoint has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 6. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
round.calcCornerArc (cognitive 16) src/round.mjs:29— round.calcCornerArc has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
drawing-nodes.CRp.drawPie (cognitive 16) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:660— drawing-nodes.CRp.drawPie has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
run::getPositionTopBottom (cognitive 16) src/extensions/layout/breadthfirst.mjs:352— run::getPositionTopBottom has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (10 pts), if/else 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
generateBarrel (cognitive 16) src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:295— generateBarrel has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). None of this is in the body itself: all 16 points belong to 7 function items inside it that branch (checkPoint, checkPoint::getCurveT, a function literal at line 408, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
MethodTooLong: ElementDrawingWebGL._createShaderProgram src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:155— MethodTooLong — _createShaderProgram runs 211 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 111 over it, 2.11× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
ClassTooLong: ElementDrawingWebGL src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:44— ClassTooLong — 658 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 29 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 258 over it, 1.65× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities· Medium vulnerability · ×1
Change coupling: drawing-shapes.mjs ↔ node-shapes.mjs src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-shapes.mjs:1— `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-shapes.mjs` and `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/node-shapes.mjs` change together 50% of the time (8 of the 16 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `530ee3e8` :sparkles: Introduce node caching + support outline + include test fo… (at that commit the files were still `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-shapes.js` and `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/node-shapes.js`); `29a3aa63` :construction: WIP (at that commit the files were still `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-shapes.js` and `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/node-shapes.js`); `fe60c2a0` Generalize the round-triangle to round-polygon - Missing a specific … (at that commit the files were still `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-shapes.js` and `src/extensions/renderer/canvas/node-shapes.js`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Coverage not measured — JavaScript/TypeScript suite — Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the repository root runs mocha but declares no coverage provider, so the suite can run and still produce no lcov — add `c8` (or `nyc`) as a devDependency so the suite can be wrapped for coverage. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository's maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run.
Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (6 clone groups) src/collection/data.mjs:5— 6 duplicated blocks under src/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories collection, core, extensions — 4 of them are reported below, and 2 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 6 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 6 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 6 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.
Duplicated block (81 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:126— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:126 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:220 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (61 lines × 2 locations) src/selector/expressions.mjs:235— src/selector/expressions.mjs:235 · src/selector/expressions.mjs:302 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (57 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (57 matched lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:115— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs:115 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:516 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 346 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (48 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (48 matched lines × 2 locations) src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:43— src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:43 · src/collection/algorithms/markov-clustering.mjs:28 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 388 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (37 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (37 matched lines × 2 locations) src/collection/data.mjs:5— src/collection/data.mjs:5 · src/core/data.mjs:3 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 148 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (34 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:507— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:507 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:550 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (30 lines × 2 locations) debug/tests.js:578— debug/tests.js:578 · debug/tests.js:614 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (28 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (28 matched lines × 2 locations) src/core/viewport.mjs:122— src/core/viewport.mjs:122 · src/core/viewport.mjs:171 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 132 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/layout/circle.mjs:16— src/extensions/layout/circle.mjs:16 · src/extensions/layout/grid.mjs:16 — the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:403— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:403 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:429 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:253— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:253 · src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:373 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2 locations) src/collection/events.mjs:6— src/collection/events.mjs:6 · src/core/events.mjs:6 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (15 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (15 matched lines × 2 locations) src/collection/filter.mjs:108— src/collection/filter.mjs:108 · src/collection/filter.mjs:138 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 107 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (12 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (12 matched lines × 2 locations) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/fxaa-upscaler.mjs:167 · src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/misc-upscaler.js:95 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 62 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Complex function parseImpl (cyclomatic 113, cognitive 182) REDACTED:61— parseImpl has cyclomatic complexity 113 and cognitive complexity 182; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function touchmoveHandler (cyclomatic 96, cognitive 168) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1437— touchmoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 96 and cognitive complexity 168; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function render (cyclomatic 90, cognitive 91) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:278— render has cyclomatic complexity 90 and cognitive complexity 91; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function getAllInBox (cyclomatic 65, cognitive 161) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:322— getAllInBox has cyclomatic complexity 65 and cognitive complexity 161; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function mousemoveHandler (cyclomatic 64, cognitive 127) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:566— mousemoveHandler has cyclomatic complexity 64 and cognitive complexity 127; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function boundingBoxImpl (cyclomatic 64, cognitive 125) src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:492— boundingBoxImpl has cyclomatic complexity 64 and cognitive complexity 125; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function findEndpoints (cyclomatic 60, cognitive 98) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-endpoints.mjs:54— findEndpoints has cyclomatic complexity 60 and cognitive complexity 98; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function drawText (cyclomatic 58, cognitive 106) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-label-text.mjs:180— drawText has cyclomatic complexity 58 and cognitive complexity 106; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function findEdgeControlPoints (cyclomatic 48, cognitive 61) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:718— findEdgeControlPoints has cyclomatic complexity 48 and cognitive complexity 61; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function drawOutline (cyclomatic 45, cognitive 76) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:336— drawOutline has cyclomatic complexity 45 and cognitive complexity 76; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function getElement (cyclomatic 44, cognitive 51) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:101— getElement has cyclomatic complexity 44 and cognitive complexity 51; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function mouseupHandler (cyclomatic 43, cognitive 80) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:834— mouseupHandler has cyclomatic complexity 43 and cognitive complexity 80; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function restore (cyclomatic 42, cognitive 89) src/collection/index.mjs:350— restore has cyclomatic complexity 42 and cognitive complexity 89; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function applyParsedProperty (cyclomatic 42, cognitive 66) src/style/apply.mjs:409— applyParsedProperty has cyclomatic complexity 42 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function touchendHandler (cyclomatic 39, cognitive 66) src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1856— touchendHandler has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function findTaxiPoints (cyclomatic 37, cognitive 54) src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:310— findTaxiPoints has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 54; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity· Complex function Element (cyclomatic 36, cognitive 37) · ×1
Complex function Element (cyclomatic 36, cognitive 37) src/collection/element.mjs:6— Element has cyclomatic complexity 36 and cognitive complexity 37; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function affinityPropagation (cyclomatic 34, cognitive 64) src/collection/algorithms/affinity-propagation.mjs:152— affinityPropagation has cyclomatic complexity 34 and cognitive complexity 64; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function dataImpl (cyclomatic 32, cognitive 72) src/define/data.mjs:29— dataImpl has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 72; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function drawInscribedImage (cyclomatic 32, cognitive 45) src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-images.mjs:18— drawInscribedImage has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs: 1662 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/base/load-listeners.mjs has 1662 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
src/math.mjs: 1179 lines of code src/math.mjs:1— src/math.mjs has 1179 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
debug/tests.js: 1111 lines of code debug/tests.js:1— debug/tests.js has 1111 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs: 1098 lines of code src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:1— src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs has 1098 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs: 962 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-elements-webgl.mjs has 962 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs: 847 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/edge-control-points.mjs has 847 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
src/style/properties.mjs: 840 lines of code src/style/properties.mjs:1— src/style/properties.mjs has 840 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs · ×1
src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs: 832 lines of code src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs:1— src/collection/dimensions/bounds.mjs has 832 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
src/style/apply.mjs: 666 lines of code src/style/apply.mjs:1— src/style/apply.mjs has 666 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs: 664 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-nodes.mjs has 664 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
src/collection/index.mjs: 638 lines of code src/collection/index.mjs:1— src/collection/index.mjs has 638 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs: 567 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs has 567 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs: 535 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs has 535 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs: 527 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs has 527 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs: 514 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs has 514 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs: 495 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/layered-texture-cache.mjs has 495 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs: 482 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/coords.mjs has 482 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs: 469 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/base/coord-ele-math/labels.mjs has 469 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
src/core/viewport.mjs: 468 lines of code src/core/viewport.mjs:1— src/core/viewport.mjs has 468 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs · ×1
src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs: 419 lines of code src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs:1— src/extensions/renderer/canvas/ele-texture-cache.mjs has 419 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
No typecheck script — test ✓ · lint ✓ · typecheck ✗ — read from this repository's package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: `test` for the suite, `lint` or `prettier` for linting, `typecheck`/`type-check`/`tsc` for type checking. ✗ therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline — a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A ✓ means the wiring is DECLARED — a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite.
Dead file (~148 LoC) snippets/images.js— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~77 LoC) snippets/visual.js— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~73 LoC) snippets/animated-bfs.js— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~52 LoC) snippets/performance-tuning.js— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~4 LoC) src/cjs.mjs— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~0 LoC) debug/webgl/cytoscape.umd.js— no import path from any entry point (23 application, 5 tooling, 47 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Deprecated: inflight REDACTED:5210— inflight 1.0.6 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This module is not supported, and leaks memory. Do not use it. Check out lru-cache if you want a good and tested way to coalesce async requests by a key value, which is much more comprehensive and powerful.". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: nomnom REDACTED:6471— nomnom 1.8.1 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Package no longer supported. Contact support@npmjs.com for more info.". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: glob REDACTED:7882— glob 7.2.3 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting i@izs.me". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 — If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 5 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-redraw.mjs, src/extensions/renderer/canvas/drawing-edges.mjs, REDACTED, src/extensions/renderer/base/arrow-shapes.mjs, src/style/bypass.mjs. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2 — If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 4 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: src/extensions/renderer/base/node-shapes.mjs, src/extensions/renderer/canvas/export-image.mjs, src/collection/algorithms/a-star.mjs, src/collection/algorithms/hierholzer.mjs. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #3 — If anonymized user #3 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/drawing-redraw-webgl.mjs, src/extensions/renderer/canvas/webgl/atlas.mjs, debug/webgl/init.js. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
D16 · Bus Factor· Further sole-owners (lower concentration) · ×1
Further sole-owners (lower concentration) — 2 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold — folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (15 single-owned of 97 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 97 of the 222 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #4 (2 file(s)), anonymized user #5 (1 file(s)) — spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above. The files folded here: src/collection/algorithms/k-clustering.mjs, src/collection/algorithms/hierarchical-clustering.mjs, src/collection/algorithms/page-rank.mjs.
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `(repository root)` (96663 LoC, 199 module-visible types across 49 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
D28 · Secrets (history)· Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
Blanket warning suppression src/extensions/layout/cose.mjs:545— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No SAST REDACTED:2— No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add CodeQL's javascript-typescript pack, `semgrep --config=p/javascript`, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 10170 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
Unused export 'mapEmpty' src/util/maps.mjs:5— Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in src/util/index.mjs, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in src/util/index.mjs in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists.
Unused export 'pushMap' src/util/maps.mjs:16— Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in src/util/index.mjs, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in src/util/index.mjs in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists.
Unused export 'deleteMap' src/util/maps.mjs:80— Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in src/util/index.mjs, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in src/util/index.mjs in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists.
Unused export 'now' src/util/timing.mjs:34— Nothing ultimately consumes this binding: its only referrer is the re-export in src/util/index.mjs, whose re-exported name has no consumer either. Removing it is therefore not a one-file change — drop the re-export line in src/util/index.mjs in the same commit, or the barrel will import a name that no longer exists.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused module-local declaration 'copy' · ×1
Unused module-local declaration 'copy' playwright-tests/renderer.spec.js:3— This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module — not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused module-local declaration 'isExternal' · ×1
Unused module-local declaration 'isExternal' rollup.config.mjs:41— This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module — not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused module-local declaration 'randInt' · ×1
Unused module-local declaration 'randInt' test/modules/util.mjs:5— This top-level declaration is not exported and its name occurs nowhere else in its module — not called, read, typed against, re-exported or named by a string. Nothing outside the module can reach a non-exported binding, so this is the whole search: remove it, or use it.
Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — npm pinning read, dependency currency not (the committed lockfile resolved no direct production dependency) — This repository's npm dependencies were read for PINNING discipline: 0 production declaration(s) plus 33 development one(s) across 1 package.json (1 of them the product — the rest are example, documentation or fixture manifests, which are read and counted but screened off the rules below, because both prescribe a MOVE and "align your example apps" is not a remedy), against 1 committed lockfile(s). No pinning defect was found. That is only PART of dependency hygiene, so this dimension is NOT SCORED: whether any of these packages has a newer, deprecated or abandoned release is the dependency-CURRENCY question, and answering it needs concrete resolved versions. This repository's committed lockfile WAS read and it resolves no direct production dependency to grade — a package.json states version RANGES, which name no particular release to be behind. That is a fact about this repository, not a reader we are missing. A clean pinning pass is NOT an all-clear for these dependencies, and it is not a finding that they are all USED. Note also what is deliberately NOT charged here: a workspace legitimately carries ONE lockfile for many manifests, so no row is raised off the lockfile count, only reported. Known CVEs in the same dependency graph are a separate question again, reported under D30 wherever the manifest is OSV-readable.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a18a70-d38e-7437-8118-3b2038184924 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 46 · Warnings: 441 · Recommendations: 54 · Info: 1 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 30-10-2026 @ 01:33 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.