{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PhoneAnalyzer.detect_and_parse (cognitive 17): PhoneAnalyzer.detect_and_parse has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (9 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/phone_analyzer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4964f5c9ffd4e6f7a40209a592dca102413ced90f3e2f418c16922909abbdeaa"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Core: TooManyMethods \u2014 40 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 10 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/core.rb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c243ab02675c8bce3ec90177f0ec549658269c52b5fde633ef8c3ff54948b38"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Phone (LCOM4 5): Phone\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/phone.rb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bf28bc911a150e77f28dddc50eb3cfaf4454f05123e7810be795738bf190f3c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/validators/phone_validator.rb: lib/validators/phone_validator.rb changed 5 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is PhoneValidator.validate_each at line 90), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfixed merge bug and bumped version\u201D; \u201Cfix: align structured validation diagnostics\u201D; \u201Cfix: load validator regardless of require order\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-22..2026-10-20, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-22 20:10:21 \u002B03:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-20 20:10:21 \u002B03:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/validators/phone_validator.rb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/validators/phone_validator.rb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90c6c1626f3e392256a4c7ee4445d6aad8f2eb1d88e1f19f18cd72a150f30056"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: # normalization for passed country unless we are not talking about International XXX \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/phone_analyzer_helper.rb"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15fb639fb8f0c44144abf5ac61c85c6e2f3ce91bc4637062e69f059b1dbb520d"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no architecture or design documentation: The document does not mention any architecture or design documentation. Add a short Architecture section describing the gem\u0027s structure and how it interacts with libphonenumber."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84cad5aa969f5ef844b476779546edef18771267fa062b44c62e3faed24d67b7"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicate validation logic across Core and Phone types. Core provides class-level validation methods that accept a phone string, while Phone provides instance-level methods. While technically distinct (class vs instance), the naming \u0060valid?\u0060/\u0060invalid?\u0060 is identical, which can confuse users about whether they are calling a static utility or an instance method. More critically, \u0060Phonelib.Core.valid_for_country?\u0060 and \u0060Phonelib.Phone.valid_for_country?\u0060 create a parallel API surface where the user must choose between the \u0027Core\u0027 entry point and the \u0027Phone\u0027 object entry point for the same logical operation.: Ensure documentation clearly distinguishes between static utility methods (Core) and instance methods (Phone). Consider if \u0060Phonelib.valid?\u0060 is necessary if \u0060Phonelib.parse(phone).valid?\u0060 is the preferred idiomatic path, or vice versa. If both are kept, ensure their behavior is strictly identical to avoid confusion. (signatures: Phonelib.Core.valid?(phone_number) | Phonelib.Core.invalid?(phone_number) | Phonelib.Phone.valid?() | Phonelib.Phone.invalid?())"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e446155db04908204c438f36733bf3052aa2465141fb0825d05ba796220dd028"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Semantic overlap between \u0060Core.parse\u0060 and \u0060PhoneAnalyzer.analyze\u0060. Both accept a phone string and an optional country and likely return similar structured data or a Phone object. The distinction between \u0027parsing\u0027 (converting string to object) and \u0027analyzing\u0027 (determining properties) is blurred here. If \u0060Core.parse\u0060 returns a \u0060Phone\u0060 object, \u0060PhoneAnalyzer.analyze\u0060 seems redundant unless it returns a different, more detailed structure. If it returns the same structure, it is a duplicate operation with a confusingly different name.: Clarify the return types. If \u0060PhoneAnalyzer.analyze\u0060 returns a \u0060Phone\u0060 object, remove it or deprecate it in favor of \u0060Core.parse\u0060. If it returns a distinct analysis result, rename \u0060Core.parse\u0060 to \u0060Core.parse_to_phone\u0060 or similar to distinguish the intent of \u0027parsing for validation/formatting\u0027 vs \u0027analyzing for metadata\u0027. (signatures: Phonelib.Core.parse(phone, passed_country) | Phonelib.PhoneAnalyzer.analyze(phone, passed_country))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"478c160e2b4655fd7847439d4e63654892652b48e4bba67e0a2040162b0478d4"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Ambiguous naming for data accessors. \u0060phone_data\u0060, \u0060data_by_country_codes\u0060, and \u0060phone_ext_data\u0060 all appear to expose internal data structures. The naming convention is inconsistent (\u0060phone_data\u0060 vs \u0060data_by_...\u0060 vs \u0060phone_ext_...\u0060). It is unclear if these are meant for public consumption or internal use. If public, they should follow a consistent naming pattern (e.g., \u0060get_phone_data\u0060, \u0060get_country_data\u0060).: Standardize the naming convention for data accessors. If these are internal, mark them as such or remove them from the public API surface if possible. If public, use consistent verbs like \u0060get_\u0060 or nouns like \u0060phone_data\u0060, \u0060country_data\u0060, \u0060extension_data\u0060. (signatures: Phonelib.Core.phone_data() | Phonelib.Core.data_by_country_codes() | Phonelib.Core.phone_ext_data())"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a4a24625945190de0fc99e345dc440f5e85b02186e55d0d54acf8f706eaa5c1"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c3f72c6ba89cb32e345f1994aaad484e2e27f7fe4ee270cd3b0d88f398d900c"},"properties":{"commitSha":"83df73cfdc29b134106d45d72fbd4b99fdc21435"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47778939935661d1b1e3e1296d73b33b4eb79c1c976e269492caa7f705a949d5"},"properties":{"commitSha":"9ff7d3ef439465866b66747c2d721634f19d1b64"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfb3ac523c6fdbb48fbf7cf7aa218d25426cfe9571c224c39723634b2102276f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5ccdbb4f94bf4ccf0ca287f2ad270f88200f7b47357057f8b4aaca0872fd8fb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7ed499fc0fc51e0db0a931ad1fa7f87010f60514d062031c6aac1b6e2bd7d66"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"362728e36c2c46b66a94ba5ae9ece5a4bb59d52fa17e33a667f8267f92e31ba9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-639","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5df44c5255339bc6a5e228968429d488182799a9bc2fe37edb3a78ed36381d5d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-639","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ceac6a8c43a559c6f5ab878dece92c4496ea5d1686edf92ec00e86e76a4d0dab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-639","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f9f717b52090a871e70a6bb09f69fd91b64d1c35e0aaef6976e960d19dffdf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-639","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb3fd5954f86abe5a9732fa88beadb6a7f7832b3ade42fc3881a35f04653b99d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b3cdea1e36a4b7ad594717cc5b32000ce5de2da42641f62ca8d8b343c9b51a5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-601","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"534431eb341e588aae02aade2266285ec25e32f4443dfcf9e828d09fd751978b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-601","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be80013650baf2278741fc430d2b2939162d790aa82f54e5815e39948de0f1c0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-22","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cda961e34fb0883a24d6aa60b730d93df7943e5ec3e8a7d56e1349708888e29f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-540","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0d6c6b6b9ba619291f8da72c4f16ab81e884de6ec48e2d63d9c8fa32cc956fd"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"rack","version":"3.0.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D44","level":"warning","message":{"text":"End-of-life runtime: Ruby 2.7: .ruby-version declares Ruby 2.7 as this project\u0027s version file, and Ruby 2.7, support ended 2023-03-31. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2023-03-31 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".ruby-version"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cea3899e1d509e6d04e4a16f803e7382902da6d83199f7c29b35472a35943f9f"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add brakeman for Rails apps, otherwise \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 or CodeQL\u0027s ruby pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2083 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060Phonelib.phone_data[country] \u0026\u0026 Phonelib.phone_data[country][Core::COUNTRY_CODE]\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/phonelib/phone_analyzer_helper.rb, lib/phonelib/phone_formatter.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/phone_analyzer_helper.rb"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24ddccfdbbc43288e5c7f907ab2e48fc5d391e0353baa01b18eec5cedb287e42"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060initialize\u0060 is public, takes a document from its caller (line 21) and hands it to \u0060immutable_copy\u0060, which walks \u0060value\u0060 as a \u0060Hash\u0060 and calls itself at line 47 (\u0060self.immutable_copy\u0060) with a piece of \u0060value\u0060 (and at line 50) \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060immutable_copy\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends stack per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. A walk like this one raises \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 past about 3,800 levels on the main thread and about 1,000 on a \u0060Thread\u0060 \u2014 where Puma serves requests and Sidekiq runs jobs (MRI 3.3 and 4.0). \u0060JSON.parse\u0060 stops at 100 levels by default, but the other parsers a caller may use do not: \u0060YAML.safe_load\u0060 builds 1,400 levels from 2.8 KB, \u0060Oj.load\u0060 100,000, REXML 200,000, and \u0060JSON.load\u0060 on json 2.7 (Ruby 3.3\u0027s default) or \u0060JSON.parse(\u2026, max_nesting: false)\u0060 58,000. \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 is not a \u0060StandardError\u0060: a bare \u0060rescue\u0060 or \u0060rescue =\u003E e\u0060 around the call does not stop it. Thread a depth argument through \u0060immutable_copy\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/validation_error.rb"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2ed766a3ebbd11d2193cbf32abf11295c936c22322e5040d0aa74f9d90fb0ae"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060intern_hashes\u0060 is public and takes \u0060hash\u0060 \u2014 which it walks as a \u0060Hash\u0060 \u2014 from its caller, and it calls itself at line 42 (\u0060self.intern_hashes\u0060) with a piece of \u0060hash\u0060 \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060intern_hashes\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends stack per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. A walk like this one raises \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 past about 3,800 levels on the main thread and about 1,000 on a \u0060Thread\u0060 \u2014 where Puma serves requests and Sidekiq runs jobs (MRI 3.3 and 4.0). \u0060JSON.parse\u0060 stops at 100 levels by default, but the other parsers a caller may use do not: \u0060YAML.safe_load\u0060 builds 1,400 levels from 2.8 KB, \u0060Oj.load\u0060 100,000, REXML 200,000, and \u0060JSON.load\u0060 on json 2.7 (Ruby 3.3\u0027s default) or \u0060JSON.parse(\u2026, max_nesting: false)\u0060 58,000. \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 is not a \u0060StandardError\u0060: a bare \u0060rescue\u0060 or \u0060rescue =\u003E e\u0060 around the call does not stop it. Thread a depth argument through \u0060intern_hashes\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/data_importer_helper.rb"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d18aff0b551ed07c219d8a103337f526f88a5a9f9a8a02fbeb1f23d6998179a"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060hash_from_xml\u0060 is public and takes \u0060data\u0060 \u2014 which it walks as an XML element \u2014 from its caller, and it calls itself at line 88 (\u0060self.hash_from_xml\u0060) with a piece of \u0060data\u0060 \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060hash_from_xml\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends stack per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. A walk like this one raises \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 past about 3,800 levels on the main thread and about 1,000 on a \u0060Thread\u0060 \u2014 where Puma serves requests and Sidekiq runs jobs (MRI 3.3 and 4.0). \u0060JSON.parse\u0060 stops at 100 levels by default, but the other parsers a caller may use do not: \u0060YAML.safe_load\u0060 builds 1,400 levels from 2.8 KB, \u0060Oj.load\u0060 100,000, REXML 200,000, and \u0060JSON.load\u0060 on json 2.7 (Ruby 3.3\u0027s default) or \u0060JSON.parse(\u2026, max_nesting: false)\u0060 58,000. \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 is not a \u0060StandardError\u0060: a bare \u0060rescue\u0060 or \u0060rescue =\u003E e\u0060 around the call does not stop it. Thread a depth argument through \u0060hash_from_xml\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/phonelib/data_importer_helper.rb"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91252530e613d320da1a99a2015c40ffad255ffc6e620f17e6b9856245c8a202"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Ruby\u0027s type checker does not check nil everywhere: This repository commits no Sorbet configuration (\u0060sorbet/config\u0060) and no \u0060Steepfile\u0060, so nothing type-checks its 16 Ruby product file(s): a nilable value reaches a method call silently and raises \u0060NoMethodError: undefined method \u2026 for nil\u0060 the first time it is nil. A \u0060# typed:\u0060 sigil does nothing without a \u0060sorbet/config\u0060 beside the code; a Steep run configured only on a command line is not something this check can read."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b27113b1bc22f400935e8620d19eae7fd3ef145cc36018609c445ea8cd4af1"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","guid":"11a336ce-63de-c45c-845e-29ca1e8df13d","name":"CWE-1333","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1333"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1333.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-22","guid":"b68d9ca7-bdde-d057-a6cc-9f8b1e739552","name":"Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-540","guid":"1a9db5db-e5bb-ae5d-935a-d1b4e9ee080b","name":"Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/540.html"},{"id":"CWE-601","guid":"9b8963d5-129b-475c-90cf-2d1766e66f2f","name":"URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (\u0027Open Redirect\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (\u0027Open Redirect\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html"},{"id":"CWE-639","guid":"fd233662-97cf-025a-972b-66c9473efbcd","name":"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key","shortDescription":{"text":"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/639.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A01:2025","guid":"df693558-c822-0452-8f7b-4d53cb6bcc59","name":"Broken Access Control","shortDescription":{"text":"Broken Access Control"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A01_2025-Broken_Access_Control/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":20,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}