{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor (cyclomatic 33): DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c13ba92dd7a4fdb7d0f9c2e2546d3242c2f752e80305971942fa8bfb0e218d81"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor (cyclomatic 33): DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66aa3874453196cb5fa7f120f642cda5087c5c1756a07d40ed22d12bf11348b7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor (cyclomatic 33): DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":438}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4e42a6868ac1d50aacbd94586cc3756a371e959c9bf792b54f5cfb9e8ead10c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor (cyclomatic 33): LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor, LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f733a24d6d3582d4f6f242e3320e69daba9a822bccf2a4104c8acb0f432c6268"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor (cyclomatic 33): LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor, LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24fcfae3a2e34895eb03ba3e69a846f3590340c7b9dd34d6548904999709a43d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor (cyclomatic 33): LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor, LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":439}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"820673ce1e714ccacbbea46bd902588767758acd970375857c9feb064b52069d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor (cognitive 49): DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3c392668afb619dd43c3125b5e9431fd80b68676b846f9d5da290c6adb17c8e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor (cognitive 49): DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f503ce7f82c838061ef57aa67c57710b93f4b84f9b08a2e6c56937cd5b1b051"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor (cognitive 49): DarkTheme.GetSolidForeColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (DarkTheme.GetSolidBackColor, DarkTheme.GetSolidBorderColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":438}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f81dd57f2bfeaf4c1839f73afe8af8badbe7355bb183419df2d22f735c66834"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor (cognitive 49): LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor, LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22205384365bacb289d808f77f8ba71f54d68e988e63e02ff000f07161c17b52"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor (cognitive 49): LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor, LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41d3eac8f9d9af3ec1534a828cb7787f5ba817e7d4e18e0874521490f02734a3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor (cognitive 49): LightTheme.GetSolidForeColor has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (LightTheme.GetSolidBackColor, LightTheme.GetSolidBorderColor) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":439}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0702c0aa8d46efd19a4ffb9c36df218f81f5c6b16ffd06732e307bb0603a9652"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: DarkTheme: ClassTooLong \u2014 440 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 9 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 40 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a9be7df83bfc60d5e152f5db299fb658fb28486427f8b5a6f48653f7d6a58e2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: LightTheme: ClassTooLong \u2014 440 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 9 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 40 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13a0397b156082b841ecc410d9bf3d4d0ea23f1a11aefd4698a3fea810d19896"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (101 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:231-331 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:232-332 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7718705848dd301f5e08a961bd3f921e360f352fc4ac662d76b3e7a32dd3d2f3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (101 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:335-435 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:336-436 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57658a6ba598a228bd927cdcff7df607a3174f42130ec9612ab8a93d0bf11ac7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (101 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:439-539 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:440-540 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":439}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c36129c2cfc34a64dc8ecc674ebeb590e865c28f56996cf209200d28680cd84"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25\u201330 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Utilities/Typography/MonospaceFont.vb:29-53 | WinFormsBootstrap/Utilities/Typography/SansSerifFont.vb:29-58 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Utilities/Typography/MonospaceFont.vb"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8467911b08f54c80ca63fbfcd4d065cda2077c16815599256dac0a49067767ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/Alert.vb:253-281 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/Button.vb:194-222 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/Alert.vb"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4bec393ab33e012a8cfd96b15ce95ebd1cdb4e13e7aaadd93c90d04452bd452"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb:119-139 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb:119-139 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f2da34e5fea76aad9c63a8dd4704667d7093045822f62018b618e7de74e28d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb:73-92 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb:73-92 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20b1401dc55a0ffbdd457110524c3af5df4a0da04c1a63ab9861a450952f5921"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb:96-115 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb:96-115 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Alert/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2db165503eae0b2e1dca85eb4125c118040127c67e12fa67dccdcf54bef81488"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:167-179 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:168-180 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73ac1154c5e156740bdbf56647324cf92aa892dba295c23670c7bf4e92e62769"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:183-211 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:184-212 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af82ccbe4cc140ea3a9e136600f0b93aea16bd36139ea1874cd3233be3f2fe11"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb:215-227 | WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb:216-228 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb\u0060 and \u0060WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/LightTheme.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 358 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WinFormsBootstrap/Components/Button/DarkTheme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"073b15def9aaa1c4b207cfe0891a23799d450383501e3f315ce266211a3f031f"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}