Executive summary
dddplus/dddplus-demo scores 62 out of 100, but it is rated At risk while a critical security finding is open; the score itself is unchanged. Watchdog judged it as a template, sample or demo, meant to be read or copied, so the dimensions about building, releasing and running a product don't apply, and its lenses are rated against a lower bar. The score itself is worked out as for any repository.
The weakest lens counts most in the score, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 47 and is rated Adequate. Its Security & performance tooling dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing and to resolve the 3 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 62 to about 72.
Seven findings are critical: five in Dependency Vulnerabilities and two in Static Analysis (SAST).
Watchdog couldn't measure 17 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Dependency Hygiene, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 1,924 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €3,200, to rebuild.
If Production Readiness rose from 47 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 62 to about 72.
New since the last survey: 1 finding
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing · REDACTED
Fixed since the last survey: 1 finding
- Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €3,200 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €1,100 to €5,400, for 18 to 57 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.9 at a score of 62. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Very small: 1,924 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture — module dependency graph
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 cp.oms.domain.facade.cache | 2 cp.oms.infra.po | 3 cp.oms.spec.exception | 4 cp.oms.spec.model.vo | 5 cp.oms.spec.resource | 6 oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc | 7 cp.oms.domain.facade.lock | 8 cp.oms.domain.model.vo | 9 cp.oms.infra.dao | 10 cp.oms.infra.manager | 11 cp.oms.spec.model | 12 bp.oms.fresh | 13 bp.oms.isv | 14 bp.oms.ka | 15 cp.oms.domain.model | 16 cp.oms.domain.specification | 17 cp.oms.infra.dao.mock | 18 cp.oms.infra.lock | 19 cp.oms.infra.manager.impl | 20 cp.oms.spec.ext | 21 oms.d.stock.spec.service | 22 bp.oms.fresh.extension | 23 bp.oms.isv.extension | 24 bp.oms.ka.extension | 25 cp.oms.domain.ability.extension | 26 cp.oms.domain.facade.mq | 27 cp.oms.domain.facade.repository | 28 cp.oms.domain.step | 29 cp.oms.infra.translator | 30 cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b | 31 cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair | 32 cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance | 33 oms.d.stock.domain.service | 34 cp.oms.domain.ability | 35 cp.oms.domain.service | 36 cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder | 37 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder | 38 cp.oms.infra.mq | 39 cp.oms.infra.repository | 40 cp.oms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 cp.oms.domain.facade.cache | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 cp.oms.infra.po | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 cp.oms.spec.exception | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 cp.oms.spec.model.vo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 cp.oms.spec.resource | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 cp.oms.domain.facade.lock | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 cp.oms.domain.model.vo | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 cp.oms.infra.dao | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 cp.oms.infra.manager | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 cp.oms.spec.model | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 bp.oms.fresh | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 bp.oms.isv | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 bp.oms.ka | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 cp.oms.domain.model | 2 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 cp.oms.domain.specification | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 cp.oms.infra.dao.mock | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 cp.oms.infra.lock | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 cp.oms.infra.manager.impl | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 cp.oms.spec.ext | 1 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 oms.d.stock.spec.service | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 bp.oms.fresh.extension | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 bp.oms.isv.extension | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 bp.oms.ka.extension | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 cp.oms.domain.ability.extension | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 cp.oms.domain.facade.mq | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 cp.oms.domain.facade.repository | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 cp.oms.domain.step | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 cp.oms.infra.translator | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33 oms.d.stock.domain.service | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34 cp.oms.domain.ability | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35 cp.oms.domain.service | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38 cp.oms.infra.mq | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39 cp.oms.infra.repository | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 cp.oms | 1 |
7→1 cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.IRedisLockFactory→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.IRedisClient
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.cache can break cp.oms.domain.facade.lock, while a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.lock can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
7→4 cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.IRedisLockFactory→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.domain.facade.lock, while a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.lock can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.facade.lock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
8→4 cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItem→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IOrderItemorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItemDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IOrderItemorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItemDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IOrderItemDelegateorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.Product→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IProductorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.ProductDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IProductorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.ProductDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IProductDelegate
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.domain.model.vo, while a change to cp.oms.domain.model.vo can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
8→15 cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses cp.oms.domain.model part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItemDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderModelCreatororg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.ProductDelegate→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderModelCreator
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.model.vo uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.model.vo, while a change to cp.oms.domain.model.vo can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
9→2 cp.oms.infra.dao uses cp.oms.infra.po✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.dao uses a type in cp.oms.infra.po.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderItemDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderItemDataorg.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderMainDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainData
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.dao uses cp.oms.infra.po, so a change to cp.oms.infra.po can break cp.oms.infra.dao, while a change to cp.oms.infra.dao can't break cp.oms.infra.po.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.dao uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
10→2 cp.oms.infra.manager uses cp.oms.infra.po✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.manager uses a type in cp.oms.infra.po.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.IOrderManager→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainData
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.manager uses cp.oms.infra.po, so a change to cp.oms.infra.po can break cp.oms.infra.manager, while a change to cp.oms.infra.manager can't break cp.oms.infra.po.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.manager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
11→4 cp.oms.spec.model uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.spec.model uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IOrderItemDelegateorg.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IProductDelegate
- Direction
- cp.oms.spec.model uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.spec.model, while a change to cp.oms.spec.model can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.spec.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
12→11 bp.oms.fresh uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.fresh uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.fresh.FreshPartner→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.fresh uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.fresh, while a change to bp.oms.fresh can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.fresh uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→11 bp.oms.isv uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.isv uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.isv.IsvPartner→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.isv uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.isv, while a change to bp.oms.isv can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.isv uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→11 bp.oms.ka uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.ka uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.ka.KaPartner→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.ka uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.ka, while a change to bp.oms.ka can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.ka uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→4 cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.model uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IOrderItemDelegateorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.IProductDelegate
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.domain.model, while a change to cp.oms.domain.model can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→8 cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.domain.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.model uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItemDelegateorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.ProductDelegateorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderModelCreator→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.OrderItemorg.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderModelCreator→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.vo.Product
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.domain.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model.vo can break cp.oms.domain.model, while a change to cp.oms.domain.model can't break cp.oms.domain.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→11 cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.model uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.model uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.domain.model, while a change to cp.oms.domain.model can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→11 cp.oms.domain.specification uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.specification uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.specification.ProductNotEmptySpec→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.specification uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.domain.specification, while a change to cp.oms.domain.specification can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.specification uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→2 cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses cp.oms.infra.po✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses a type in cp.oms.infra.po.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.mock.MockOrderItemDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderItemDataorg.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.mock.MockOrderMainDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainData
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses cp.oms.infra.po, so a change to cp.oms.infra.po can break cp.oms.infra.dao.mock, while a change to cp.oms.infra.dao.mock can't break cp.oms.infra.po.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→9 cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses cp.oms.infra.dao✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses a type in cp.oms.infra.dao.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.mock.MockOrderItemDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderItemDaoorg.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.mock.MockOrderMainDao→org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderMainDao
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses cp.oms.infra.dao, so a change to cp.oms.infra.dao can break cp.oms.infra.dao.mock, while a change to cp.oms.infra.dao.mock can't break cp.oms.infra.dao.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.dao.mock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→1 cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.lock uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.lock.RedisLock→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.IRedisClientorg.example.cp.oms.infra.lock.RedisLockFactory→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.IRedisClient
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.cache can break cp.oms.infra.lock, while a change to cp.oms.infra.lock can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.lock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→4 cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.lock uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.lock.RedisLock→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntryorg.example.cp.oms.infra.lock.RedisLockFactory→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.infra.lock, while a change to cp.oms.infra.lock can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.lock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→7 cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.lock✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.lock uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.lock.RedisLockFactory→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.IRedisLockFactory
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.lock uses cp.oms.domain.facade.lock, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.lock can break cp.oms.infra.lock, while a change to cp.oms.infra.lock can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.lock uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→2 cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.po✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a type in cp.oms.infra.po.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.impl.OrderManager→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainData
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.po, so a change to cp.oms.infra.po can break cp.oms.infra.manager.impl, while a change to cp.oms.infra.manager.impl can't break cp.oms.infra.po.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→9 cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.dao✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a type in cp.oms.infra.dao.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.impl.OrderManager→org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderMainDao
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.dao, so a change to cp.oms.infra.dao can break cp.oms.infra.manager.impl, while a change to cp.oms.infra.manager.impl can't break cp.oms.infra.dao.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→10 cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.manager✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a type in cp.oms.infra.manager.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.impl.OrderManager→org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.IOrderManager
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses cp.oms.infra.manager, so a change to cp.oms.infra.manager can break cp.oms.infra.manager.impl, while a change to cp.oms.infra.manager.impl can't break cp.oms.infra.manager.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.manager.impl uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→4 cp.oms.spec.ext uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.spec.ext uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.spec.ext uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.spec.ext, while a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.spec.ext uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→11 cp.oms.spec.ext uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.spec.ext uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IAssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPostPersistExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IReviseStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISensitiveWordsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.spec.ext uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.spec.ext, while a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.spec.ext uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→11 oms.d.stock.spec.service uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in oms.d.stock.spec.service uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.oms.d.stock.spec.service.IStockService→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- oms.d.stock.spec.service uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break oms.d.stock.spec.service, while a change to oms.d.stock.spec.service can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: oms.d.stock.spec.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→11 bp.oms.fresh.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.fresh.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.fresh.extension.PostPersitExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.bp.oms.fresh.extension.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.fresh.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.fresh.extension, while a change to bp.oms.fresh.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.fresh.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→20 bp.oms.fresh.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.fresh.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.fresh.extension.PostPersitExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPostPersistExtorg.example.bp.oms.fresh.extension.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPresortExt
- Direction
- bp.oms.fresh.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break bp.oms.fresh.extension, while a change to bp.oms.fresh.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.fresh.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→4 bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.isv.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break bp.oms.isv.extension, while a change to bp.oms.isv.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.isv.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→5 bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.resource✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.isv.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.resource.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.DecideStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.resource.IStockRpc
- Direction
- bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.resource, so a change to cp.oms.spec.resource can break bp.oms.isv.extension, while a change to bp.oms.isv.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.resource.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.isv.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→11 bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.isv.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.CustomModelExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.isv.extension, while a change to bp.oms.isv.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.isv.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→20 bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.isv.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPresortExtorg.example.bp.oms.isv.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- bp.oms.isv.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break bp.oms.isv.extension, while a change to bp.oms.isv.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.isv.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→4 bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.ka.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break bp.oms.ka.extension, while a change to bp.oms.ka.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.ka.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→5 bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.resource✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in bp.oms.ka.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.resource.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.AssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.resource.IStockRpc
- Direction
- bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.resource, so a change to cp.oms.spec.resource can break bp.oms.ka.extension, while a change to bp.oms.ka.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.resource.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.ka.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→11 bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.ka.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.AssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.ReviseStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break bp.oms.ka.extension, while a change to bp.oms.ka.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.ka.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→20 bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in bp.oms.ka.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.AssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IAssignOrderNoExtorg.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.ReviseStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IReviseStepsExtorg.example.bp.oms.ka.extension.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- bp.oms.ka.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break bp.oms.ka.extension, while a change to bp.oms.ka.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: bp.oms.ka.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→11 cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.DefaultAssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.domain.ability.extension, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→16 cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.domain.specification✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a type in cp.oms.domain.specification.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.DefaultAssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.domain.specification.ProductNotEmptySpec
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.domain.specification, so a change to cp.oms.domain.specification can break cp.oms.domain.ability.extension, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability.extension can't break cp.oms.domain.specification.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→20 cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.DefaultAssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IAssignOrderNoExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break cp.oms.domain.ability.extension, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability.extension can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability.extension uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→15 cp.oms.domain.facade.mq uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.mq uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.IMessageProducer→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.facade.mq uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.facade.mq, while a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.mq can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.facade.mq uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→15 cp.oms.domain.facade.repository uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.repository uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.IOrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.facade.repository uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.facade.repository, while a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.repository can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.facade.repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→3 cp.oms.domain.step uses cp.oms.spec.exception✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step uses a type in cp.oms.spec.exception.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderStep→org.example.cp.oms.spec.exception.OrderException
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step uses cp.oms.spec.exception, so a change to cp.oms.spec.exception can break cp.oms.domain.step, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step can't break cp.oms.spec.exception.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→15 cp.oms.domain.step uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.CancelOrderStepsExec→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderStepsExec→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.step, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→2 cp.oms.infra.translator uses cp.oms.infra.po✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.translator uses a type in cp.oms.infra.po.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.translator.Data2Model→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderItemDataorg.example.cp.oms.infra.translator.Data2Model→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainDataorg.example.cp.oms.infra.translator.Model2Data→org.example.cp.oms.infra.po.OrderMainData
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.translator uses cp.oms.infra.po, so a change to cp.oms.infra.po can break cp.oms.infra.translator, while a change to cp.oms.infra.translator can't break cp.oms.infra.po.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.translator uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→15 cp.oms.infra.translator uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.translator uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.translator.Data2Model→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderModelCreatororg.example.cp.oms.infra.translator.Model2Data→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.translator uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.infra.translator, while a change to cp.oms.infra.translator can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.translator uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→4 cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→11 cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→20 cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.coldchain_b2b uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→4 cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→11 cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair.ReviseStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→20 cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair.ReviseStepsExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IReviseStepsExtorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.hair uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→4 cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.vo.LockEntry
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.model.vo, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model.vo can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance can't break cp.oms.spec.model.vo.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→11 cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.AssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→20 cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.AssignOrderNoExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IAssignOrderNoExtorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.PresortExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPresortExtorg.example.cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance.SerializableIsolationExt→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance, while a change to cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.pattern.extension.home_appliance uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→6 oms.d.stock.domain.service uses oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a type in oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc.
- The types involved
org.example.oms.d.stock.domain.service.StockService→org.example.oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc.IRemoteStockRpc
- Direction
- oms.d.stock.domain.service uses oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc, so a change to oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc can break oms.d.stock.domain.service, while a change to oms.d.stock.domain.service can't break oms.d.stock.domain.facade.rpc.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→11 oms.d.stock.domain.service uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.oms.d.stock.domain.service.StockService→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- oms.d.stock.domain.service uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break oms.d.stock.domain.service, while a change to oms.d.stock.domain.service can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→21 oms.d.stock.domain.service uses oms.d.stock.spec.service✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a type in oms.d.stock.spec.service.
- The types involved
org.example.oms.d.stock.domain.service.StockService→org.example.oms.d.stock.spec.service.IStockService
- Direction
- oms.d.stock.domain.service uses oms.d.stock.spec.service, so a change to oms.d.stock.spec.service can break oms.d.stock.domain.service, while a change to oms.d.stock.domain.service can't break oms.d.stock.spec.service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: oms.d.stock.domain.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→1 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.SerializableIsolationAbility→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.IRedisClient
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.facade.cache, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.cache can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.cache.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→7 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.facade.lock✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.SerializableIsolationAbility→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.IRedisLockFactory
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.facade.lock, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.lock can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.lock.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→11 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.spec.model✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.spec.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.AssignOrderNoAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.CustomModelAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.PostPersistAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.PresortAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.SerializableIsolationAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.model.IOrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.spec.model, so a change to cp.oms.spec.model can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.spec.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→15 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.ReviseStepsAbility→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→20 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.spec.ext✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.spec.ext.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.AssignOrderNoAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IAssignOrderNoExtorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.PostPersistAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPostPersistExtorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.PresortAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IPresortExtorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.ReviseStepsAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.IReviseStepsExtorg.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.SerializableIsolationAbility→org.example.cp.oms.spec.ext.ISerializableIsolationExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.spec.ext, so a change to cp.oms.spec.ext can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.spec.ext.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→25 cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.ability.extension✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.ability uses a type in cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.AssignOrderNoAbility→org.example.cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.DefaultAssignOrderNoExt
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.ability uses cp.oms.domain.ability.extension, so a change to cp.oms.domain.ability.extension can break cp.oms.domain.ability, while a change to cp.oms.domain.ability can't break cp.oms.domain.ability.extension.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.ability uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→15 cp.oms.domain.service uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.service uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.service.CancelOrder→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.service.SubmitOrder→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.service uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.service, while a change to cp.oms.domain.service can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→28 cp.oms.domain.service uses cp.oms.domain.step✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.service uses a type in cp.oms.domain.step.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.service.CancelOrder→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.CancelOrderStepsExecorg.example.cp.oms.domain.service.SubmitOrder→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderStepsExec
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.service uses cp.oms.domain.step, so a change to cp.oms.domain.step can break cp.oms.domain.service, while a change to cp.oms.domain.service can't break cp.oms.domain.step.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.service uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→15 cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder.BasicStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder.StateStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→28 cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses cp.oms.domain.step✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.step.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder.BasicStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.CancelOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder.StateStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.CancelOrderStep
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses cp.oms.domain.step, so a change to cp.oms.domain.step can break cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder can't break cp.oms.domain.step.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.cancelorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→3 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.spec.exception✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in cp.oms.spec.exception.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BasicStep→org.example.cp.oms.spec.exception.OrderException
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.spec.exception, so a change to cp.oms.spec.exception can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break cp.oms.spec.exception.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→15 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BasicStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BroadcastStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.PersistStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.PresortStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.ProductStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMainorg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.StockStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→21 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses oms.d.stock.spec.service✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in oms.d.stock.spec.service.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.StockStep→org.example.oms.d.stock.spec.service.IStockService
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses oms.d.stock.spec.service, so a change to oms.d.stock.spec.service can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break oms.d.stock.spec.service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→26 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.facade.mq✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BroadcastStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.IMessageProducer
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.facade.mq, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.mq can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→27 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.facade.repository✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.PersistStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.IOrderRepository
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.facade.repository, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.repository can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→28 cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.step✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a type in cp.oms.domain.step.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BasicStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.BroadcastStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.PersistStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.PresortStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.ProductStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderSteporg.example.cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder.StockStep→org.example.cp.oms.domain.step.SubmitOrderStep
- Direction
- cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses cp.oms.domain.step, so a change to cp.oms.domain.step can break cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder, while a change to cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder can't break cp.oms.domain.step.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.domain.step.submitorder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→15 cp.oms.infra.mq uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.mq uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.mq.MessageProducer→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.mq uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.infra.mq, while a change to cp.oms.infra.mq can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.mq uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→26 cp.oms.infra.mq uses cp.oms.domain.facade.mq✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.mq uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.mq.MessageProducer→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.IMessageProducer
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.mq uses cp.oms.domain.facade.mq, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.mq can break cp.oms.infra.mq, while a change to cp.oms.infra.mq can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.mq.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.mq uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→9 cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.infra.dao✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.repository uses a type in cp.oms.infra.dao.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.repository.OrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderItemDaoorg.example.cp.oms.infra.repository.OrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.infra.dao.OrderMainDao
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.infra.dao, so a change to cp.oms.infra.dao can break cp.oms.infra.repository, while a change to cp.oms.infra.repository can't break cp.oms.infra.dao.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→10 cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.infra.manager✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.repository uses a type in cp.oms.infra.manager.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.repository.OrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.infra.manager.IOrderManager
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.infra.manager, so a change to cp.oms.infra.manager can break cp.oms.infra.repository, while a change to cp.oms.infra.repository can't break cp.oms.infra.manager.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→15 cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.domain.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.repository uses a type in cp.oms.domain.model.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.repository.OrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.domain.model.OrderMain
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.domain.model, so a change to cp.oms.domain.model can break cp.oms.infra.repository, while a change to cp.oms.infra.repository can't break cp.oms.domain.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→27 cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.domain.facade.repository✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms.infra.repository uses a type in cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.infra.repository.OrderRepository→org.example.cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.IOrderRepository
- Direction
- cp.oms.infra.repository uses cp.oms.domain.facade.repository, so a change to cp.oms.domain.facade.repository can break cp.oms.infra.repository, while a change to cp.oms.infra.repository can't break cp.oms.domain.facade.repository.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms.infra.repository uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→35 cp.oms uses cp.oms.domain.service✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in cp.oms uses a type in cp.oms.domain.service.
- The types involved
org.example.cp.oms.ExampleTest→org.example.cp.oms.domain.service.SubmitOrder
- Direction
- cp.oms uses cp.oms.domain.service, so a change to cp.oms.domain.service can break cp.oms, while a change to cp.oms can't break cp.oms.domain.service.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: cp.oms uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Domain Modelling
Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping
| OWASP category | Findings | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| A05:2025 — Injection | 5 | High / Critical |
| A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures | 5 | High / Critical |
Roadmap
First, integrate automated security scanning into the CI pipeline to block regressions before they land. Next, resolve orphaned files to ensure knowledge freshness and maintain a changelog to track release history. Finally, enhance documentation quality by adding a quick-start build and run section to the root README for new users.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing. | +10.5 pts | Medium | Security & performance tooling |
| Resolve the 3 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with REDACTED, OrderServer.java, OrderMain.java. | +5.1 pts | Low | Knowledge Freshness |
| Resolve the 1 Orphaned files with no living knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. | +2.9 pts | Low | Knowledge Freshness |
| Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release. | +4.5 pts | Medium | Release Hygiene |
| Improve Documentation Quality — currently 7.0/10. | +3.2 pts | Medium | Documentation Quality |
| Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs. | +2.9 pts | Medium | Documentation (README) |
| Declare the default where Java declares it: `@NullMarked` (org.jspecify.annotations) in each package's `package-info.java`, or once in `module-info.java`, and run NullAway (Error Prone) or the Checker Framework so the declaration is enforced. Then annotate the real exceptions `@Nullable` and resolve the suppressions rather than adding to them: a `@SuppressWarnings("NullAway")` or `castToNonNull(x)` on a value the checker could show to be null is a `NullPointerException` waiting for the path that makes it true — where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (a null check, `Objects.requireNonNull`, a non-null field initialised in the constructor). | +2.6 pts | Medium | Nullable reference types |
| Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (opentelemetry-java or Micrometer) and a health-check endpoint (Spring Boot Actuator's /actuator/health, or a /health route) for operability. | +2.2 pts | Medium | Observability |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | 2.1 | Mixed | Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 4.8 | Mixed | Dependency Vulnerabilities: Critical CVE: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Near-clean | Dependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.9 | Near-clean | Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED |
| order-center-cp/cp-oc-domain/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/domain/step/submitorder/PresortStep.java | 8.2 | Near-clean | Explicit Debt: TodoComment |
| order-center-cp/cp-oc-domain/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/domain/step/CancelOrderStepsExec.java | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) |
| order-center-pattern/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/pattern/HairPattern.java | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) |
| order-center-bp-isv/src/main/java/org/example/bp/oms/isv/IsvPartner.java | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 59 of 62 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 62 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 21 of 26 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.java) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
- D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.java) and this repository declares a JVM test suite (repository root, Maven), but it was not re-run: the analyzer environment could not run it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository's dependency manifests WERE read and their pinning discipline assessed; what went unanswered is the currency half, because oss.sonatype.org — the registry that answers it — was asked and did not reply (the build stopped because oss.sonatype.org, a repository this project declares, refused it with HTTP 403 — what this scan's egress allowlist returns for a host that is not on it; 11 dependencies were resolved and graded first, but the graph is partial so the result is reported and not scored). This is OUR side and it is an ENVIRONMENT fault, not a missing collector: the collector exists and ran. An HTTP 403 here is what this scan's egress allowlist returns for a host that is not on it, so the remedy is to add oss.sonatype.org to the allowlist and re-run — not to build anything.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (2 contributor(s) across 118 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 98% of the history; the other 1 hold 2% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict.
- D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
- C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
- C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
- C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
- C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
- DM9 Scattered domain decisions — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Arm one resolves each comparison operand to the domain member it judges, and that binding exists only in a Roslyn compilation, which this run did not load. Arm two ran over the neutral model because this repository's frontend declares whether each construction is produced or passed. A rule decided in two places would not appear above.
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and no C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby or Scala was found, and this repository's Java is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- P1 CI/CD gates — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. A CI pipeline exists and the word "test" appears, but no explicit test-runner invocation (your stack's test command, or a test job) was matched — so either the gate runs tests through a step this pass could not recognise, or "test" is incidental here (a path, "latest", a reporter). Which of the two it is cannot be settled from this dimension's evidence; the coverage dimensions report whether a suite exists at all. You can widen what we reach: name the test runner explicitly in the pipeline step (your stack's test command, or a job named for the suite) so the gate is unambiguous to a reader and to this pass.
- P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
- X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X10 Duplicated predicate — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- DM4 Rich vs anemic model: Behaviour is detected as state mutation inside a method body — a method that enforces an invariant by validating-and-throwing without mutating reads as a query, and mutation delegated through an interface the scan can't resolve isn't credited; entities with zero public properties still drop out of the population. It detects that state changes, not whether the rule is correct.
- DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
3 duplicated block group(s) detected.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with CancelOrderStepsExec.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with HairPattern.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with IsvPartner.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D5 · Coupling
13 production modules (Maven), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; 0 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 10 of the 13 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 9 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D13 · Secret Scanning
Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D14 · License Compliance
0 of 8 declared JVM dependency artifact(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from the POMs Maven Central publishes, over the coordinates this repository's 16 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) declare with a version resolvable from the manifest itself — the same declaration-site closure this analysis reads for dependency currency. The JVM has no lockfile a checkout is guaranteed to carry, so this is deliberately NOT the transitive closure. 35 further coordinate(s) are declared with no version at the declaration site — inherited from a parent POM, a BOM or an unresolved Gradle version reference — and are NOT graded: this verdict covers what the checkout pins, not the full transitive graph. A further 1 coordinate(s) are not published to Maven Central — another repository (Google's Maven hosts androidx), a SNAPSHOT, or a private artifact — so their licences are not readable from here and they are outside this verdict.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
1 deducted task-comment markers across 1924 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 9.9. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with PresortStep.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D19 · Documentation Quality
The repository's root README is a well-written marketing page for the DDDplus demo showing an OMS order center with architecture and terms explained. It links to the directory READMEs (OMS, dddplus-archetype), lists a full outline of sections under each heading, and shows commands in a shell block ('git clone', 'mvn package', 'java -jar ...'). The order-center-cp/README is an internal deployment doc for that directory, not the repository, so its quality is judged only against itself.
What to do
- Improve Documentation Quality — currently 7.0/10. — The repository's root README is a well-written marketing page for the DDDplus demo showing an OMS order center with architecture and terms explained. It links to the directory READMEs (OMS, dddplus-archetype), lists a full outline of sections under each heading, and shows commands in a shell block ('git clone', 'mvn package', 'java -jar ...'). The order-center-cp/README is an internal deployment doc for that directory, not the repository, so its quality is judged only against itself.
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 10 build units (Maven) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D28 · Secrets (history)
gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
5 finding(s): 0 critical, 2 high, 3 medium, 0 low. 2 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens.
What to do
- Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 2 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities
5 finding(s): 1 critical, 4 high, 0 medium, 0 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 4 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (4). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Critical CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
3 of 3 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is REDACTED. Counted over 3 of the 88 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What to do
- Resolve the 3 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with REDACTED, OrderServer.java, OrderMain.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
- Resolve the 1 Orphaned files with no living knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
D43 · Malicious Dependencies
No dependency in any ecosystem this repository declares is published as malicious.
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 0 platform declaration(s) and 27 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AX1 · Captive dependencies
AX10 · Code composition
AX2 · Stateful singletons
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX6 · Interface segregation
DM1 · Aggregate boundaries
DM11 · Constructible invalid state
DM12 · Ambient inputs in the domain
DM4 · Rich vs anemic model
DM5 · Encapsulated state
DM6 · Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary
DM7 · Repository granularity
DM8 · Value-object opportunities
DM9 · Scattered domain decisions
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs
- A test is skipped/ignored — coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something. (×2) — order-center-cp/cp-oc-test/src/test/java/org/example/cp/oms/ExampleTest.java:22, order-center-cp/cp-oc-test/src/test/java/org/example/cp/oms/PluginMechanismTest.java:22
What to do
- Clear the softer debt: re-enable or delete @Disabled/@Ignore tests, decide whether each empty method or UnsupportedOperationException is deliberate (and say so in a comment), and replace @SuppressWarnings("all") with targeted, justified suppressions.
M1 · Documentation (README)
- This repository declares its own end of life: `README.md` line 1 reads “# Archived”. That is a first-party statement of intent, not an inference — the Maturity and Knowledge lenses otherwise approximate the same fact from decayed commit history (D16 reports a dormant codebase, D34 orphaned files), and this row says the maintainer already told you. It does NOT change any score: an honest end-of-life notice is the README doing its job, and every dimension below still measures the code as it stands. Read the whole report as an assessment of software the author has stopped working on. — README.md:1
What to do
- Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
- Add a README to the 14 of 15 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1.9 pts.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
P1 · CI/CD gates
What to do
- Run the test suite in CI via an explicit runner step (`mvn test` for the toolchain this pipeline already uses) and gate merges on it.
P2 · Observability
What to do
- Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (opentelemetry-java or Micrometer) and a health-check endpoint (Spring Boot Actuator's /actuator/health, or a /health route) for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling
- No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 543 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
- Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X20 · Mistyped argument guard
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X4 · Structured logging
X5 · Nullable reference types
- 0/45 of this repository's Java package directories are under a non-null default: a `package-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked` (JSpecify) or `@NonNullApi`, `@ParametersAreNonnullByDefault`, `@NonNullByDefault`, `@DefaultQualifier(NonNull.class)`; a `module-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked`; every type in it `@NullMarked`; or a build that runs NullAway with the package in `AnnotatedPackages`, or the Checker Framework's `NullnessChecker`. Elsewhere every reference admits null and no checker warns on the dereference that throws a `NullPointerException`.
What to do
- Declare the default where Java declares it: `@NullMarked` (org.jspecify.annotations) in each package's `package-info.java`, or once in `module-info.java`, and run NullAway (Error Prone) or the Checker Framework so the declaration is enforced. Then annotate the real exceptions `@Nullable` and resolve the suppressions rather than adding to them: a `@SuppressWarnings("NullAway")` or `castToNonNull(x)` on a value the checker could show to be null is a `NullPointerException` waiting for the path that makes it true — where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (a null check, `Objects.requireNonNull`, a non-null field initialised in the constructor).
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 75% | Adequate — gated by X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 96% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Maturity | 66% | Adequate — gated by D34 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 47% | Adequate — gated by P3 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 90% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Domain Modelling | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — 1 observation(s) recorded · The CI pipeline builds and tests but publishes no released artifact — no package publish, container push, GitHub release or deployment step. Supply-chain provenance, signing and SBOM attest RELEASED artifacts, so there is nothing to attest here. Add them to the release pipeline when this repo starts shipping artifacts (a published package, a container image, a deployed service or a tagged release). Build integrity and workflow-token hygiene are reported below: they describe what the CI runs and the token it runs with, neither of which is affected by whether the pipeline ships an artifact.
Not evidenced — 5 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 61 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
- AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
- AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — This repository has nothing the runtime tiers could boot or serve — no markup, no UI framework or web-server dependency, no UI component source, no native UI project and no API definition — nothing here is a surface to boot — so runtime a11y/egress/header evidence has no subject here. Not applicable: this is neither a gap in the scan nor a finding about your code.
- C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D10 Test Quality — ~580 lines of test source are present (.java) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
- D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — the .java suite was found but not re-run
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency currency not established — oss.sonatype.org did not answer
- D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D20 ADR Quality — N/A — this repo declares itself a template / kata / sample / demo; a formal ADR log is deferred to a real application built from it.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Aggregate roots were found in only one source directory (cp), which is a layered codebase, not two contexts. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.java), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
- D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- D9 Test Distribution — Test source is present (.java) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so its unit/integration/BDD/E2E split couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
- DM10 One transaction, one aggregate — no repository writes detected — no operation to judge against the one-aggregate rule
- DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no id-bearing domain types detected — strongly-typed-id adoption not assessable
- DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
- ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
- ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- M2 Architecture documentation — This repo declares itself a template / kata / sample / demo — formal architecture documentation (ADRs, C4 diagrams) is deferred to a real application built from it, so its absence is not a defect here.
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
- P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — no outbound HTTP usage detected — no HTTP client call or construction in the JVM source (service entry point: REDACTED:16 (@RestController))
- P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a REDACTED, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Java code has 2,417 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
- PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Not applicable: this repository declares no async functions, so there is no asynchronous code for a blocking call to stall.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X10 Duplicated predicate — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X12 Unreachable branch — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X13 Undrained process stream — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Java was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Java request off Android takes no token: it is cancelled through the handle it returns (Future.cancel, Call.cancel, a Disposable), ambiently (io.grpc.Context) or by interrupting its thread, not through a parameter
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 7 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
Serious — 9 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- TodoComment order-center-cp/cp-oc-domain/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/domain/step/submitorder/PresortStep.java:16
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) order-center-cp/cp-oc-domain/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/domain/step/CancelOrderStepsExec.java:1
- Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) order-center-pattern/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/pattern/HairPattern.java:1
- Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) order-center-bp-isv/src/main/java/org/example/bp/oms/isv/IsvPartner.java:20
- Repository declared end-of-life README.md:1
Minor — 10 finding(s)
- Orphaned file REDACTED:1
- Orphaned file order-center-cp/cp-oc-main/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/OrderServer.java:1
- Orphaned file order-center-cp/cp-oc-domain/src/main/java/org/example/cp/oms/domain/model/OrderMain.java:1
- Disabled test order-center-cp/cp-oc-test/src/test/java/org/example/cp/oms/ExampleTest.java:22
- Disabled test order-center-cp/cp-oc-test/src/test/java/org/example/cp/oms/PluginMechanismTest.java:22
- Orphaned files with no living knowledge
- REDACTED
- No SAST
- No changelog
- Java packages are not null-marked everywhere
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-5966174c4a8b43809589c17d064b5315/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-5966174c4a8b43809589c17d064b5315/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 5 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | osv-scanner | — | osv-scanner --format json --recursive --experimental-disable-plugins transitivedependency/requirements --experimental-disable-plugins dotnet/csproj --experimental-disable-plugins dotnet/nugetcpm . | 5 | artifacts/raw/osv-scanner.json |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan. | 0 | — |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D40 · Network Egress Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | osv-scanner | — | osv-scanner --format json --recursive --experimental-disable-plugins transitivedependency/requirements --experimental-disable-plugins dotnet/csproj --experimental-disable-plugins dotnet/nugetcpm . | 0 | artifacts/raw/osv-scanner.json |