{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D24","name":"Comment Value","shortDescription":{"text":"Comment Value"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D24"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: attr: TooManyFunctions \u2014 682 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 652 over it, 22.73\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":869}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8dba94bdbaa59f23a9b1e8b86853b31741c0cc922a8576a478de0125db448e25"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: attr: TooManyMethods \u2014 526 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 496 over it, 17.53\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b6a0a080b1d6705040b3d877c2fec2e5d914253bd7e3b9b61c3799efea6cbc9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: DocExtensions: TooManyMethods \u2014 309 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 279 over it, 10.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"079db7c9eaabc8685004bfa5723a8ae35b2219cc574076f5a24cd707bc6f9407"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: CSharpDocExtensions: TooManyMethods \u2014 284 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 254 over it, 9.47\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ec00be29f8e886a92a30d050edd36a70ceb3d34d0250875cc3c9f775ca37e89"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: on: TooManyMethods \u2014 281 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 251 over it, 9.37\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1616}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0e5f4469a35826635d1c388fe30b813bcb9c3a575154725335731995be6658f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: on: TooManyFunctions \u2014 280 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 250 over it, 9.33\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":2923}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be05e377dab225d507f3d8e58c3a8c062700a23e92acce60e0395e9093bc336d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Elt\u0027: TooManyMethods \u2014 172 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 142 over it, 5.73\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1072}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32e3b1c10317822540e5b0c094d61db97bfb83c0062ad516bb157396b5ede624"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Elt: TooManyMethods \u2014 148 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 118 over it, 4.93\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74d2c8c5a926dd1b9e82c4495a4132c72e89d8aa19c32c70100e7f9f71762b04"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 2461 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1961 over it, 4.92\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e2b04b4cc711f4e28758bcd51f28a0ced3f101b38eb2a0ab8dbbb212125331f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: Html: TooManyFunctions \u2014 140 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 110 over it, 4.67\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09b64eaa08bda19acaf52c39a351102c22a759f3527b5e14ddf750412ce631a6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: onProxy: TooManyMethods \u2014 140 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 110 over it, 4.67\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/HTML.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"642d39a0338a9a8ca817363044cb202cb3eb583af7f7d28b7336c88fd13d45ba"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: EltExtensions: TooManyMethods \u2014 139 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 109 over it, 4.63\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/Doc.Server.fs"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee0738f678c9f2a2b7e6333536985b8b9c167b9aa72b7ce1d5c4e9c2dd77cde4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/HTML.Client.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 1623 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1123 over it, 3.25\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a81e7ff1845475971c2ecca39b9c4156b25bd2865fe65e1c39e03ced9b8a4054"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: SvgElements: TooManyFunctions \u2014 80 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 50 over it, 2.67\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":624}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6dcec2af4bc1a8047733faae4b7e69bd1634eae640288202e5dbbec0c5ffa532"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 1328 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 828 over it, 2.66\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bba4261a6defb65c9f25a7575a820dea0ad198a3978ee1c8c6a806275ec7a1a2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Doc\u0027: TooManyMethods \u2014 77 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 47 over it, 2.57\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":449}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76aee3d91e3f2dda7f116fc8dfb987e2389ff0bfe783ccafed53b53967ab3969"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: Doc: TooManyFunctions \u2014 60 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 30 over it, 2.00\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41d47f77c00d5455820919d199cef1dbf97c7014023f4bf1b9a9cdd069db1996"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 842 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 342 over it, 1.68\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7448905e6b6eef19d26d464fa1d7ce3ae7ac6cb1b190404784f55456869da063"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI.Templating.Common/Parsing.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 807 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 307 over it, 1.61\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating.Common/Parsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abbe05162c6eb528ad8dda2e5b877bf3cb2f3644383689bb4cfe05dd43d29634"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: InputType: TooManyFunctions \u2014 47 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 17 over it, 1.57\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0ccf5fc251ddc5ee62719b56d9c7a75b94390bc3694d9562951897e4cc9dc2f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: InputType: TooManyFunctions \u2014 45 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 15 over it, 1.50\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":569}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e402449569e47f38c41c953a4f09c2ca9c1e03a1c821d027c063d4fec36aabba"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 713 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 213 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a62cc4cdeebd7589b101a66749d39b1cc9416ebd2d81fa0c31a18c6252d39bb6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 692 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 192 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"129a3533101afca70bc7d5db7e84204720b9bc727ea95d74d39e0b182e571052"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 689 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), declaring 34 functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 189 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"961b2fbb4551da4c784fea3ed6ae56552f8ad1b25b10db311669ddd786b870fc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: Snap: TooManyFunctions \u2014 41 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 11 over it, 1.37\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Snap.fs"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3e3c971227f55f3b7e38173792f831d541f05866483760caa7da582a3e66c9e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: View: TooManyMethods \u2014 39 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 9 over it, 1.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Reactive.fs"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9eb996d6b9a0e3acbd90c9335a505153c24f72889963d76e1da5d799c10bce77"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/Templates.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 623 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 123 over it, 1.25\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Templates.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"619ae0cdc82c632ecf07ab712cd9d15a9f018e1d2c9e00070a4cf3418892dfbc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI.CSharp/Doc.Client.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 599 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 99 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670fffcc014fa84519112361d9c24ec3375eda3abc0f79ae635c98e4677f18cc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: Attr: TooManyFunctions \u2014 33 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 3 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Attr.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":442}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69ac48cdc905cd2a04b3f4480b6382d1d33cb599cfb85268f92fbde397f47ba5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ListModel: TooManyMethods \u2014 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Models.fs"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24201c44f45829319778c82c0eb8fa17b05e49eeca7fbeadef28495f88ce1fa7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 517 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a36571e1e36c2e9afad32a11321785703707512f1b8de4cb69e938b66faf947e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyFunctions: Macros: TooManyFunctions \u2014 31 functions. The bar is 30 functions; this is 1 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. The counted members are a module\u0027s functions \u2014 a module holds no instance state, so there is no shared data to group them by and no type to move them onto. To reduce it, extract each cohesive family of functions into a new module of its own and have this one delegate to it, so no single module carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6edaf5962ea0d552511d98235f71e56845995ba9b265c9b0aed1447d12e4c216"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (372 shared lines): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:21-523 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:21-464 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 372 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c11fb55456fc4aae440128c130f2676ce03b52b9c8bd132a9672b40e33544628"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (86 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:289-374 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:243-328 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:289\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":289}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a833e53fe2d4e4dff9093f02d2f4b259a94fa75b5ebe5a8fa4f42192e721b17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (57\u201359 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:206-264 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:162-218 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"453a9ff125a42b5b63408226e17eb809eed7b71710dc4f08689c9e6eb4ddb00f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (48 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:376-423 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:330-377 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:376\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":376}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b17e4a430436858a05a17c0b3b36ca6b54b8ff9316c4cda3a16ab5a24749fd3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (39 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:60-98 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:58-96 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"800b03be738c11cbe5f822b7b142e0183ddf678c3c2b9a06a1c995cd77416b7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs:521-545 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs:704-728 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":521}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2c29945cc1b61a49e106539015988cbcf91b9d7b74195b6aecbe8d5cea47ecd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:461-484 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:415-438 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":461}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0350bad5ab2f406adc1ab688b6b0815603de496924626efa99c67451b7a3edf1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:128-149 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:99-119 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c73511d78507c5259ac9c6000925d98909737363b85845cad34f8a91d5377df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:437-458 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:391-412 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:437\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":437}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4da0ebe2f8b0c38cb5e2b0040a82fcaf9574c4149ca553d5a5cbb6f203245be7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:267-287 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:221-241 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":267}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f44b17e63670a1c079aab62d2021106ecfa3cc29f9c181a45ea662fe0a281445"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:40-59 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:38-57 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1267388ee28ab5a14209716b678805f8f4584f06be0b121c545c407a9c05f0a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:168-187 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:122-141 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e22affc5896cb4cdae7233e378415f46eecc2ddf85d0f7b8ab2724f2f8ed2dea"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs:254-270 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs:434-450 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"785abd4fb4f8f382f34019bd76050da7868dcc21fd4008e27543a596870374dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:458-472 | WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:478-492 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97f1027f041352b2e6560d0ca9ed3528bcc683db59578a38bb904fdf9bee429e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:823-837 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:858-871 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:872\u0060 calls \u0060Append\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:838\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":823}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e938759263b2b44277a029f8d7a4ec475c0a5be9d3fc5e51bd8db709dabe3c8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:23-36 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs:23-36 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldProvider.fs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 375 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd239497ce30018223d1e324c84f8b2a3747cf3900df335e1062313f59011075"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Templates.fs:91-103 | WebSharper.UI/Templates.fs:140-153 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Templates.fs"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51393b959909bfc6eb12f298076be640642c15178f0741ef511aa97a60ff8071"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:877-888 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:907-918 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":877}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbf5d162fb93fb3689c654da34f7b9d2125cff7346e6f6eba7a9f7c6bcd09f44"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Flow.fs:318-329 | WebSharper.UI/Flow.fs:348-359 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Flow.fs"},"region":{"startLine":318}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8787e4357e75d0ffde346e700f07a012d48498450b65e8cbc8456a126e8cd964"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:631-640 | WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/RuntimeClient.fs:196-206 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:631\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs"},"region":{"startLine":631}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0472358d3bdaf9837bd32037a3b6f06a4ec960090d77a586e69e77eacf730edb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:1154-1164 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:1178-1188 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"843ecb00984480cde218f173a8797e508ab0322883b583610b73e4a99ed3b2a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Reactive.fs:310-320 | WebSharper.UI/Reactive.fs:344-354 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI/Reactive.fs:310\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Reactive.fs"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4693b2181fd4242918a4bde8ae8d69f639d970e81deac1312ac8fc3759a4f5c8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs:511-519 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:822-831 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/OldMain.fs"},"region":{"startLine":511}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"426ca63557bdababe6df9b89a1ba95eb5d7d4801046ad5deb04fc15a120cb6dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:893-902 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs:923-932 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.Proxy.fs"},"region":{"startLine":893}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e212914a6d5ea2058c38f89e4124c23eb9f71b0fad6ea3c058fbf3226ecc7a76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:339-347 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:358-367 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff777734ebae1b61ce163f786778baa8a4ca8f64e3a3cbd80dcfcf7187a86412"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Models.fs:251-260 | WebSharper.UI/Models.fs:273-282 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Models.fs"},"region":{"startLine":251}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b5f38c1f5660967e94793c85ebd1fc6cb11ab3425d7ab3aea158bd3f99b7e93"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20137 lines \u00D7 4): WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:419-425 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:430-436 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:441-447 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:451-455 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs"},"region":{"startLine":419}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c119c130230e5b4900b42f897cd6a5c15004ae86273296c456d5bdfbbe0f5ff6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:736-741 | WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs:760-765 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs"},"region":{"startLine":736}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41420e27990efcdae98f20dee32d0638ac946944713f06de869dfe6d987afa5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Attr.Client.fs:304-309 | WebSharper.UI/Attr.Client.fs:322-327 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI/Attr.Client.fs:304\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Attr.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"332a66bc1e88383b3e42f7916a91cdef611ca562f1268d8f44aa3ea184b8a5fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs:850-855 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs:873-878 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":850}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cbfa1812571da4b4884371a8fb7afe7e1b0b0be163f3c71606490e8e2b10caa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:272-276 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:298-302 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:310-312 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:320-324 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:272\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:302\u0060 calls \u0060With\u0060, \u0060name\u0060 and \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:312\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e655042f21aa0f805637120399583f0e7310152b4107aeb692c6015f8e2d869a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:308-312 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:376-380 | WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs:384-388 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Macros.fs"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e25094f0bdeeb7ed37b86bd448855dec96ba4296d7be1411dce0096949cb244c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:48-52 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:64-68 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:80-84 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:94-98 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8240ad43639eb48af86b817dc8cb9e78c32989c319944bba5e6e7716f7741a51"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:56-60 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:72-76 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:88-92 | WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs:102-106 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/ReactiveExtensions.fs"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5139848481ac8cc55b369354ca15db6a89bd969a6a08c5db6cbfcd58abd51fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs:607-611 | WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs:637-641 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":607}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82c585ef0ef6be237da3a728d5d0cd5892f959c95ff2609cf31159407106ad81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/Attr.fs:275-279 | WebSharper.UI/Attr.fs:281-285 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/Attr.fs"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cead2ae6eb68954afc76bbf1fc97f42c6d61022fb8b0913040032eb189687fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:218-222 | WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:227-231 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs:218\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.Templating/TemplatingProvider.fs"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"428997891d828dd652233571c18c1e595d06620a6c95cbbe112e722ea3932d6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs:68-74 | WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs:80-86 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/DocExtensions.fs"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5888bed5fe8d240334953e3824bc9963338ce031162e8793524a0dfdb674fcb3"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 no coverage collector is wired up: Coverage NOT MEASURED: \u0060--collect:\u0022XPlat Code Coverage\u0022\u0060 names a data collector that ships in the \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 package, and this repository wires up none \u2014 no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, \u0060--collect\u0060 produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f76455259a12697ea191e83fac33075bb9a7dbb5c2c0b2c34874e1673c73948"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 6 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: WebSharper.UI/Doc.fs, WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/Runtime.fs, WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating/CodeGenerator.fs, WebSharper.UI.Templating.Runtime/RuntimeClient.fs, WebSharper.UI/Flow.fs, WebSharper.UI/Doc.Server.fs. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b9093a57267c7418eb9d21f0385128542b5609bfde4beb732f0003e4488bd38"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO \u002B with object and string \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests/Client.cs"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7455bcd869880874608fbfa4be45205234a57650531c384c7a83f1e6fb82e175"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentedOutCode: 13 consecutive commented-code lines"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests/Client.cs"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df4f7b75d4b6672dddb6962c621e8da71702bff6b160c5787dc68b48b4d34679"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: 3218 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or \u2014 if some occurrences really are legitimate \u2014 narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests/WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests.csproj"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b31a4ab28ce58b185871e8b562e0d3d5c213175c6f2ebc216be0760736f0425b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: 3218 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or \u2014 if some occurrences really are legitimate \u2014 narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating.ServerSide.Tests/WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating.ServerSide.Tests.csproj"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d432577167b8be5a4c26f94762a2453d4a489a9270ffcc750dfa2840203b041"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: CS1591 \u2014 this project generates an XML documentation file as a build output, so its documentation is something it PUBLISHES to whoever consumes the assembly, and this entry switches off a rule whose only job is to report that documentation missing or malformed. The two decisions sit in the same file and the quiet one wins: the documentation this project ships has holes exactly where the rule would have pointed, no build says so, and the people who meet the gap are downstream \u2014 in their editor, at the moment they are trying to use the member. Write the documentation the rule is asking for and drop the code from the list; where only some elements genuinely cannot carry it, narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rest of the API stays covered. If the documentation was never meant to be consumed, the honest fix is the other line \u2014 stop generating the file, so the project no longer publishes something it is choosing not to check."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests/WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests.csproj"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07490a55ae85ca194994af066ef5b8057582717ccc4d68637ea90cd8493922b6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"NoWarnInCsproj: CS1591 \u2014 this warning is switched off for the WHOLE project, in every file it builds, including code written years from now: nothing at the call site records that the rule was ever silenced, so the next reader has no reason to look here. Fix what the rule is reporting and drop the code from the list, or \u2014 if some occurrences really are legitimate \u2014 narrow the suppression to those sites and give each one its reason, so the rule keeps protecting the rest of the project."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating.ServerSide.Tests/WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating.ServerSide.Tests.csproj"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e60d90723664d632e1413b17377a08f61414ba8a969006b5eb523d7bcdaa642d"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: There are no installation, build, or setup instructions for the repository root. Add a short install/nuget line to the README so it is self-contained."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1215ef77d97b8bf1ca202a54ee91b02b2ad799f396e0de07f1a29b865bc471be"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-321","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fbd572fb826dd6f1135b5694f2a055c5dbebc02bbb2aafdf30e6c811b0f7b7f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5a4d4de115d127d1bb3000344c85fa34f2476788953be9e2b8b8d87d6f14db7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Concentrated knowledge decay: 32 of 39 significant files have no living knowledge, while the repository is still being changed at a low rate (1 commit(s) in the last 90 days) \u2014 so this is one repo-wide knowledge-decay state, not 32 separate risks. Counted over 39 of the 52 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. The code moved on without the people who understood these files: document them or schedule a read-through before the next change lands in them."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"008bd8d3156a7f5206da709f59f1f87af76671c6b9becea72c8c9cffbcbd4f8e"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b38c2891a3da7e8f75a9b167919cf7c2c84a417e179e4961ea3e93753b093ff"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI/HTML.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fd0ea50c73c3630e52a25fb81d420c6086e796b0786f9a9bb2c08404ac17e48"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"WebSharper.UI.CSharp/Doc.Client.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e811f5b340f6e9cca805422fe7df8b2edabcb6929ad99739d962784424abc7a9"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Thin README: The root README is 117 words, against a bar of 120. Of the three newcomer-critical sections this check looks for by heading, it found no a build/run or getting-started section, no a testing section, no an architecture or project-map section. Sections are matched on HEADING text only, so material written under a heading this check does not recognise \u2014 or with no heading at all \u2014 is not seen and this row may understate what the document covers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fc8f78bec0b6b3daab9d9139ba49b687f61b54f8310b64c159df9616f47e38e"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims WebSharper.UI is the new name of WebSharper.UI.Next \u2014 searched for: \u0060WebSharper.UI.Next\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad8cb98b5e73c89ec9f64e00503c1793a27396fa87015a3fb2f6cd7d5adcff57"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims a site repository at https://github.com/websharper-samples/ui but evidence shows only WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Templating.ServerSide.Tests and WebSharper.UI.CSharp.Tests repositories exist \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f28e67ee31bdd5d12600e4b7e4947e84cbdf9d40cbc8a220838900e0d6e9d1b"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 plus gitleaks for committed secrets (F# is not a CodeQL language and has no language-specific SAST engine) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-319","guid":"7af97476-9f0d-4458-9163-3d2043918a1a","name":"CWE-319","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-319"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html"},{"id":"CWE-321","guid":"0ce564a5-a44c-3358-b3db-317712e6e019","name":"CWE-321","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-321"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/321.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":4,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}