{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX2","name":"Stateful singletons","shortDescription":{"text":"Stateful singletons"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX2"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P5","name":"DR \u0026 Backup","shortDescription":{"text":"DR \u0026 Backup"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P5"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"P8","name":"Schema migrations","shortDescription":{"text":"Schema migrations"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P8"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RehabBook.awaitReservation (cognitive 16): RehabBook.awaitReservation has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 3 (6 pts), if/else 2 (5 pts), loops 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 9). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala"},"region":{"startLine":383}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fb39da465518f0aba2a7f800802e8fe38439ddf50f104d47ab7fd4c1977e833"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (45 shared lines): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:166-227 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:128-178 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 45 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27e17aaa6a0942a6336779d571c45da7ff88aa66784f258ade5b438597b61a12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:166-194 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:128-156 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:166\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55565ecd093deacb601819d387738a8a3c2ddb2f1e7d00932716cbbf912fe082"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:230-253 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:181-204 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fbf9a9a17db749a71ba396a49d050f9e3b43317e9a3fdacf9a64abc86013a0b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:256-274 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:207-225 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5db762b9238f8edee9a770c97cf453480f033cb24ed69002dbba170b09e0f9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:291-308 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:242-259 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":291}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5a25639e7af15f7205247b16fcc87b72ea1603dc0691e99a3ebbf26a35092a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:147-163 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:109-125 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e6fb6f3ac6d7a3dc1027866d08c7d6068f5f853cfe4248ec8beacdf1fe221b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:212-223 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:165-175 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:212\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b51b3fcc246e22807aba0f613bb2d96cb42d07f08f6d2059bb388d2139bde33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:277-288 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:228-239 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b56a96d260a7de6112f71898107c144cccc771e3e659f054e0235b8d0a540303"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:311-322 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:262-273 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0ef2f30b8d2d6e8e49ce1cdbb1b22f2c8622a1b6a2f0426a9797b486fe42048"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:327-338 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:278-289 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:327\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":327}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e6e031afbf664ca18849f150309b7fc3577df3a7b1b676f80f3cc83c7ce530e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:352-363 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:303-314 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":352}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84686b390ff99cf144152a248556531d9d4be2f3d2258051e9f2dd5276b1b2c6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:95-105 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:57-67 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ac763580e71e9fc9a3c3e8f14f0192ecdd7f4c4938123aa47e6f537694ab14d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:108-118 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:70-80 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bed529d58fc653ae5e88d59a7918bca031e20bca26ba230d503d0d59992ebee7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:121-131 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:83-93 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e71539c5f0fdde4c999d8271585511b6f73ea15d0117765d4a0839c2a4624f6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:134-144 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:96-106 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0403cf777a3be65500aa8039af25a3664a7de4e41f9bd1c81bb1e7af80a734a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:325-333 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:276-284 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala:343-351 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:325\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3a36fca80a39349ad48223b5c716d33ad2f1cb874ec684ba02a1b8cd093fa3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:152-157 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:114-119 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala:239-244 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:152\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e117fe37efb86b99e2519df6ee07e65e4de0615c14d27b8bf359e6b1676034aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:341-346 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:292-297 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala:359-364 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:341\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":341}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a5730b06bb79f44d421b203c717bc2870252de83300e4e03a266a1ff9729d92"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:164-169 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala:286-292 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:164\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8c6e0e6381f0050c88ee74010d1d9d938db1d4c308ba0e8a08a117b815bbf37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:201-206 | server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala:158-162 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 18 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 238 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala:201\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/Book.scala"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26740894d3020f3aed04296e9b64bf9638161e02961f45ce6c1bd020cb2a99e3"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: LuxmedApi (LCOM4 8): LuxmedApi\u0027s methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"api/src/main/scala/com/lbs/api/LuxmedApi.scala"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d4e0614bad5f7a7835c100252788c7c861a335247db40dcfe6bdb2d5cb6b06b"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: BookWithTemplate (LCOM4 4): BookWithTemplate\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/BookWithTemplate.scala"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e3bfab9783cfb5e0bc819e1f18f559567a7bdc818fa719c4ececf7118b1cedf"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: RehabBook (LCOM4 4): RehabBook\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/conversation/RehabBook.scala"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4c6853883bced2ca64078bf7c7e82a8f00b986b3f411155929e6b466b0d2361"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a91ac321ea15ccf18d8afd064c8356f6c384e47921f818671d5f0a19455167bb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bf21751a12c14a442c716c5c6abdd55483d6dd36454939ae5064d2a2c05186e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d9cc330e023e5713f820951625849c46b7020b638890b0fcf3068338e19b759"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fbbf0f85a45cee03dfb777e8829dc22e4babfe62f9512ccfac19a15e078940d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b113176095104d4e5878cf81c8f1ab1548b3291e38a25fcba7be3022ac0ea749"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f0942ecdced86565036abd599ec76fc4a4367ab0719a69cb9a240c20328fd09"},"properties":{"commitSha":"017be02ba0a8843ef0d8d1ba6f9089efd5943534"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc9220d943d35bf1136ff658f5817e72f26d11d7d048518c33160a09e1ae69cf"},"properties":{"commitSha":"68557d960a5ca7549fc48e4304142ab22f12afc6"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9deb0b3e9568df1171bacf908174d514cb7e71041f1c1975b38340d1bde8fc0"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2e1c33b058c005e6250f1c0f084e946c06ff1870f1bdd4ba3f17649dd503141"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97333efa9717b49907206dd0c5fefbc46fe42a9e41f48a501a831a60c27307b8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"456d2c3f511799653c765ed1632fec68481d07b1aa9db4d76a6f5dab8c714fd8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23b9b847659577b76b23e771fd547bcab2dd01119f710f841f35c5340754a633"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2c81dbe431c7e6ecd16a1c0618e7133a37931fc662dc7db5d8f7d0104810fbd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b759d90477959862829697ffdc99b3a901bcf57e7b2246565912bd6bddc818d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2474062e329da02d888503dcd9ef630eaecb8c4dcdda461ab05231cb601400de"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef5857b9e73e88620b2f84a6392944a888c89fada13edc783b68512066d541e8"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cf7502c5bb27abe1a4a8ecc2254ac1fc4649111742123cdaf8fc9991052eb15"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: En.scala \u2194 Ua.scala: \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/lang/En.scala\u0060 and \u0060server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/lang/Ua.scala\u0060 change together 94% of the time (29 of the 31 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 29 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060c970447b\u0060 #111 fixes null pointer exception when .termsForService.termsForDays[\u2026; \u006027b6c14b\u0060 lang: Add information about rebooking; \u0060c1ceb3d7\u0060 show a username when appointment is booked \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/lang/En.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f9758d67c1989e2b02e1a80e8d5bbeeccef7f16e330bf8093d1b9bc3a08109f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"AX2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Stateful singleton: MonitoringService: \u0060MonitoringService\u0060 is one shared instance (@Service: every request runs on it, concurrently, on the server\u0027s thread pool) but writes its own state outside any lock (activeMonitorings; e.g. \u0060activeMonitorings\u0060 in \u0060deactivateMonitoring\u0060 at line 246). Two requests that interleave lose an update, and a mutable collection written concurrently can corrupt."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/service/MonitoringService.scala"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cf046817f6f869fddebe0e7041858394dd7286c629eeea888c82983384b28bd"}},{"ruleId":"AX6","level":"note","message":{"text":"Fat interface: Lang (112 abstract members): \u0060Lang\u0060 declares 112 abstract members: \u0060id\u0060, \u0060locale\u0060, \u0060label\u0060, \u0060unableToCancelUpcomingVisit\u0060, \u0060appointmentHasBeenCancelled\u0060, \u0060yes\u0060, \u0060no\u0060, \u0060noUpcomingVisits\u0060, \u0060areYouSureToCancelAppointment\u0060, \u0060chooseDateFrom\u0060, \u0060chooseDateTo\u0060, \u0060chooseTimeFrom\u0060, \u0060chooseTimeTo\u0060, \u0060findTerms\u0060, \u0060modifyDate\u0060, \u0060moreParameters\u0060, \u0060bookingSummary\u0060, \u0060noTermsFound\u0060, \u0060createMonitoring\u0060, \u0060cancel\u0060, \u0060book\u0060, \u0060confirmAppointment\u0060, \u0060appointmentIsConfirmed\u0060, \u0060monitoringHasBeenCreated\u0060, \u0060unableToCreateMonitoring\u0060, \u0060chooseTypeOfMonitoring\u0060, \u0060bookByApplication\u0060, \u0060bookManually\u0060, \u0060rebookIfExists\u0060, \u0060pleaseSpecifyOffset\u0060, \u0060visitAlreadyExists\u0060, \u0060canNotDetectPayer\u0060, \u0060pleaseChoosePayer\u0060, \u0060city\u0060, \u0060clinic\u0060, \u0060service\u0060, \u0060doctor\u0060, \u0060previous\u0060, \u0060next\u0060, \u0060noActiveMonitorings\u0060, and 72 more. Counted over its ABSTRACT members \u2014 a \u0060def\u0060 with no body or a \u0060val\u0060/\u0060var\u0060 with no initializer, once per signature; concrete members, private and protected members, and members of a companion \u0060object\u0060 are not counted, because no implementer is forced to write them. A wide interface forces every implementer and caller to depend on methods they don\u0027t use (the Interface-Segregation \u0027I\u0027 in SOLID). Split it into focused role-interfaces."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"server/src/main/scala/com/lbs/server/lang/Lang.scala"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51f230df245d6608ace2769305787e504907dad05567da9b2a446734fdfa6f70"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"README may be stale: 70 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched \u2014 it may no longer reflect the system."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e973e7a8d5d866995cbf78b120250fe7f132bf928812d48ca62e69aba11b9910"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add scalafix or scapegoat (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2697 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No rollback/health safety: Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a \u0060healthcheck:\u0060 and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to \u2014 the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db6bab8a28a2145f47e5a4e6683cda39d2ba0296c723238e8057da979ae1c706"}},{"ruleId":"P5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No DR/backup evidence: A persistence guard (data volume / purge-protection) was found, but no backup, geo-recovery or RTO/RPO controls were evidenced \u2014 a volume that survives a container recreate is not a tested restore from catastrophic loss."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5daabb38c90b07af65b8738cf94ce884e90a7d8fef810d341de5c186188c8fe0"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Scala\u0027s null is not held to the type system everywhere: No build over this repository\u0027s 106 Scala product file(s) passes \u0060-Yexplicit-nulls\u0060, enables WartRemover\u0027s \u0060Null\u0060 wart or runs Scalafix\u0027s \u0060DisableSyntax.noNulls\u0060, so every reference type admits null and nothing reports a \u0060null\u0060 written into the code or returned from a Java API \u2014 the first one to reach a method call is a \u0060NullPointerException\u0060. \u0060Option\u0060 by convention is a habit no tool here holds the code to."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23e7c3c6da50151f07723c64ca4f881fd5903e713d143161a7c0594ad7ba29cc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":19,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}