Executive summary
ericksonreyes/domain-driven-design scores 46 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while four of its six lenses score higher still: Security and Compliance at 100 and Architecture at 98, both rated Exemplary, Domain Modelling at 83, rated Strong, and Code Health at 71, rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those four because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Maturity, which scores 30 and is rated Weak. Its Knowledge Freshness dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Maturity can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 8 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness and to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality, and if Maturity rose to 70, the score would rise from 46 to about 58.
Three findings are critical, all in Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary.
Watchdog couldn't measure 18 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Dependency Hygiene, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 2,917 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €7,200, to rebuild.
If Maturity rose from 30 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 46 to about 58.
New since the last survey: 3 findings
- Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary · Domain depends on infrastructure: MockBuggedEventHandler spec/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/MockBuggedEventHandler.php
- Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary · Domain depends on infrastructure: CommandBus src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/CommandBus.php
- Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary · Domain depends on infrastructure: EventBus src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/EventBus.php
Rebuild cost: about €7,200 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €2,400 to €12,000, for 40 to 127 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | High, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.7 at a score of 46. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Small: 2,917 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.Exception | 2 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Exception | 3 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces | 4 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation | 5 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.Exception | 6 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Exception | 7 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person.Exception | 8 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces | 9 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common | 10 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common | 11 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts | 12 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation | 13 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject | 14 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address | 15 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person | 16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain | 17 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign | 18 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure | 19 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain | 20 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain | 21 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application | 22 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain | 23 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.Exception | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Exception | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.Exception | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Exception | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person.Exception | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain | 2 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application | 1 | 1 |
10→3 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Collection→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.CanDetermineIfEmpty
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
11→3 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.CanCompareLengthEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.CanMatchStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasLength
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
12→3 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- The types involved
spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation.Box→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasCompositionspec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation.ShoppingBag→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasComposition
- Direction
- spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces can break spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation, while a change to spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Validation uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→3 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Money→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.CanCompareAmountEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Money→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasAmountEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Money→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasArrayRepresentation
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→8 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a type in EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.File→EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.CanCompareSizeEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.File→EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.HasSize
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces, so a change to EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can't break EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Interfaces.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→11 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.EmailAddress→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Identifier→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
14→11 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.City→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.CountryCode→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.State→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.Street→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address.ZipCode→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Address uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→11 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person.Name→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person.Suffix→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableStringEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person.Title→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.SizeableAndMatchableString
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Abstracts.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Person uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→10 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.History→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.Collection
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→13 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Entity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Identifier
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.EventSourcedEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Entity
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventHandler→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventPublisher→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventRepository→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Event
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→13 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.FileAttachingEntityTrait→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.FileEricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.FileAttachingEntityTrait→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Identifier
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can break EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→16 EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventSourcedEntityTrait→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventEricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.FileAttachingEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Entity
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→16 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.MockDomainEvent→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Event
- Direction
- spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain, while a change to spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.EventBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Event
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→18 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.CommandBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.CommandBusEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.EventBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventBusEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.EventBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventHandlerEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.EventBus→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.ExceptionHandler
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→13 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.DomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.IdentifierEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.EventSourcedDomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.Identifier
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Common.ValueObject.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→16 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.DomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EntityEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.DomainEntityWasDeletedEvent→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EventEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.EventSourcedDomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.EntityEricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.EventSourcedDomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Event
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→17 EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.
- The types involved
EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain.EventSourcedDomainEntity→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.EventSourcedEntity
- Direction
- EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign can break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain, while a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Example.Domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→16 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- The types involved
spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.MockBuggedEventHandler→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.Event
- Direction
- spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain can break spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application, while a change to spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→18 spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a type in EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.
- The types involved
spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application.MockBuggedEventHandler→EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.EventHandler
- Direction
- spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure, so a change to EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure can break spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application, while a change to spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application can't break EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: spec.EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Application uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Domain Modelling
Roadmap
Begin by resolving orphaned files in the knowledge base and establishing a formal process for recording significant design decisions in a dedicated documentation folder. Simultaneously, update the README to accurately reflect the current repository structure and remove references to missing files. Finally, migrate the existing build and test steps to an active CI service to restore reliable automated quality gates.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolve the 8 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Money.php, SizeableAndMatchableString.php, FullName.php. | +12.7 pts | Low | Knowledge Freshness |
| Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. | +10.3 pts | Low | ADR Quality |
| Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them. | +7.0 pts | Medium | Architecture documentation |
| Reconcile the README with reality: README.md links to `LICENSE.MD`, but `LICENSE.MD` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php` does not exist. | +7.0 pts | Medium | Documentation accuracy |
| Resolve the 1 Orphaned files with no living knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. | +2.6 pts | Low | Knowledge Freshness |
| Port the existing pipeline to a CI service that is still operating — the build and test steps are already specified — and remove the dead configuration and its badge so the repository stops advertising a gate that no longer exists. | +4.2 pts | Medium | CI/CD gates |
| Improve Documentation Quality — currently 8.0/10. | +3.1 pts | Medium | Documentation Quality |
| Raise PHPStan to level 8 (`level: 8` in `phpstan.neon.dist`, or `max`) or Psalm to `errorLevel="3"` or stricter, so `?Type` is a type the checker holds you to; generate a baseline for what that surfaces only to pay it down, not to keep it. Then resolve the baselined nullness errors rather than adding to them: each is a call on a value the checker showed could be null — narrow it (`if ($x === null) { … }`, `?->`, an early return), make the property non-nullable and initialise it in the constructor, or change the return type so the null cannot arrive. | +2.9 pts | Medium | Nullable reference types |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 46 of 50 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 50 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 21 of 37 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.php) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
- D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.php) but the built-in reliability runner does not support this repository's ecosystem, so flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository's dependency manifest (composer.json) was found, but this pass cannot parse it for hygiene, so no package was assessed. Zero packages read is NOT a clean dependency tree, so this is NOT SCORED — a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. This row is about dependency HYGIENE — outdated, deprecated or unmaintained direct dependencies; known CVEs in the same dependency graph are a separate question, reported under D30 wherever the manifest is OSV-readable.
- D14 License Compliance — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — this repository declares a composer.json but commits no composer.lock this pass can read, so the set of packages it installs is not on disk: its composer.json states version CONSTRAINTS, and Composer's guidance is that a library leaves the lock uncommitted. Producing the graph needs Composer's solver, which this pass does not run, and grading whichever release happens to be newest today would be a verdict about a dependency graph nobody resolved. NOT a finding that this repository's licences are compliant: this dimension asserts nothing about its licensing in either direction.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable (1 contributor(s) across 101 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). Concentration needs a team to concentrate: with one contributor there is nobody to spread the knowledge to, so there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This dimension reads a project's own statement about the platform it runs on: a TargetFramework in a .NET project file, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain file or Cargo.toml rust-version, a .go-version, .java-version, .ruby-version, .tool-versions or .sdkmanrc, a go.mod go directive, a Maven or Gradle Java level or toolchain, a Gemfile's ruby directive, a mix.exs elixir requirement, a rebar.config minimum_otp_vsn, a pubspec.yaml SDK constraint, a build.sbt scalaVersion, or a framework major pinned by a dependency constraint. This repository carries none of them, so nothing about its platform was established. That is a gap in this analyzer's coverage, NOT a finding that the platform is supported — a language whose runtime is declared elsewhere (Package.swift, a Dockerfile) is simply not read here yet.
- AX6 Interface segregation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the public interfaces this run's compilations declare, and none was loaded, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- DM9 Scattered domain decisions — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not measured — scattered-decision detection needs expression-level symbol resolution: a comparison operand bound to the member it judges (arm one) and a construction bound to the type it produces (arm two). A Roslyn compilation carries both; arm two alone also runs on any frontend that declares whether a construction is produced or passed, and this target loaded neither.
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and no C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby or Scala was found, and this repository's PHP is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and no C#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Dart, Ruby or Scala was found, and this repository's PHP is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
- X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Scala, Ruby and Python source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Scala, Ruby or Python was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Java, Rust, Erlang, F#, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded, no Java, Rust, Erlang, F#, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found, and this repository's PHP is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Rust, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Rust, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Python, PHP, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded, and this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript, Python and PHP make no call through a named logger, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
- D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D22 Internal API Consistency: API-surface coherence is an LLM judgement over a sample of the public surface — consistency of intent across the whole API is approximated, not exhaustively verified.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- DM4 Rich vs anemic model: Behaviour is detected as state mutation inside a method body — a method that enforces an invariant by validating-and-throwing without mutating reads as a query, and mutation delegated through an interface the scan can't resolve isn't credited; entities with zero public properties still drop out of the population. It detects that state changes, not whether the rule is correct.
- DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
0 duplicated block group(s) detected.
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 8 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D13 · Secret Scanning
Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
0 deducted task-comment markers across 2917 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
D19 · Documentation Quality
The repository's single README is an excellent overview of what it does (Domain Driven Design classes and interfaces) plus installation, usage examples, and value-object listings. The architecture/design docs are well written: Command Bus, Event Bus, and Class Composition Validator each open with a one-paragraph overview, contain code blocks showing initialization, adding handlers/executing commands/events, and explain the design intent (e.g. event bus ignoring exceptions to make it proceed), plus an outline of the document's sections. The README is complete for its role as the repository root; the architecture docs are well written but not a single doc path.
What to do
- Improve Documentation Quality — currently 8.0/10. — The repository's single README is an excellent overview of what it does (Domain Driven Design classes and interfaces) plus installation, usage examples, and value-object listings. The architecture/design docs are well written: Command Bus, Event Bus, and Class Composition Validator each open with a one-paragraph overview, contain code blocks showing initialization, adding handlers/executing commands/events, and explain the design intent (e.g. event bus ignoring exceptions to make it proceed), plus an outline of the document's sections. The README is complete for its role as the repository root; the architecture docs are well written but not a single doc path.
D20 · ADR Quality
No architecture decision records were found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D22 · Internal API Consistency
6 API inconsistencies across 108 exposed types.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Inconsistent verb usage for registering handlers. CommandBus uses… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Inconsistent method naming for event handling lifecycle. The interface… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Grammatical error and inconsistency in comparison method names.… finding(s) in Internal API Consistency. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 1 build units (Composer) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D27 · Navigability
4 % of calls cross a namespace and 4 % go through an interface, but 86 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.
D28 · Secrets (history)
gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
semgrep found no security issues.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
8 of 8 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/Money.php. Counted over 8 of the 87 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What to do
- Resolve the 8 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Money.php, SizeableAndMatchableString.php, FullName.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 recommendation-level).
- Resolve the 1 Orphaned files with no living knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AX10 · Code composition
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX5 · Architecture & structure
DM1 · Aggregate boundaries
DM11 · Constructible invalid state
DM12 · Ambient inputs in the domain
DM4 · Rich vs anemic model
- `DomainEntity` is an aggregate/entity with 1 data propert(ies) but no state-changing behaviour (only data and queries) — the business logic lives in a service. — src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Example/Domain/DomainEntity.php:12
What to do
- Move business rules onto the aggregates/entities they govern so invariants are enforced at the source, not in anemic services.
DM5 · Encapsulated state
DM6 · Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary
- `MockBuggedEventHandler` (domain layer) references `EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure` — an infrastructure concern (persistence/HTTP/web). — spec/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/MockBuggedEventHandler.php:16
- `CommandBus` (domain layer) references `EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure` — an infrastructure concern (persistence/HTTP/web). — src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/CommandBus.php:14
- `EventBus` (domain layer) references `EricksonReyes.DomainDrivenDesign.Infrastructure` — an infrastructure concern (persistence/HTTP/web). — src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/EventBus.php:16
What to do
- Invert domain→infrastructure dependencies: declare interfaces in the domain, implement them in infrastructure (Dependency Inversion).
DM8 · Value-object opportunities
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
- No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
- Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- README.md links to `LICENSE.MD`, but `LICENSE.MD` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:6
- README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:57
- README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:58
- README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:59
- README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:61
- README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/EmptyIdentifierException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/EmptyIdentifierException.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — README.md:63
- docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD links to `../src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Infrastructure/EventHandler.php`, but `docs/src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Infrastructure/EventHandler.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD:9
- docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD links to `../src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Infrastructure/ExceptionHandler.php`, but `docs/src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Infrastructure/ExceptionHandler.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD:32
- docs/common/validation/CLASS_COMPOSITION_VALIDATOR.MD links to `../src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/HasComposition.php`, but `docs/common/src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/HasComposition.php` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/common/validation/CLASS_COMPOSITION_VALIDATOR.MD:36
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: README.md links to `LICENSE.MD`, but `LICENSE.MD` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/AuthenticationFailureException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/PermissionDeniedException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordConflictException.php` does not exist; README.md links to `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php`, but `src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Exception/RecordNotFoundException.php` does not exist.
P1 · CI/CD gates
- The pipeline is well-formed, but the only CI definition is `.travis.yml`, and its `README.md` build badge still points at `travis-ci.org` — a service shut down in June 2021. No other CI is configured in this repository, so nothing has been building or testing changes here since that shutdown — the steps below describe a gate that is not running. Porting it is mostly mechanical: the build and test commands already written here are what a replacement pipeline would run.
What to do
- Port the existing pipeline to a CI service that is still operating — the build and test steps are already specified — and remove the dead configuration and its badge so the repository stops advertising a gate that no longer exists.
P10 · Library API & versioning
P3 · Security & performance tooling
- No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add phpstan or psalm (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 189 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
- Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: phpstan or psalm — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X5 · Nullable reference types
- This repository commits no PHPStan or Psalm configuration (`phpstan.neon[.dist]`, `phpstan.dist.neon`, `psalm.xml[.dist]`, or one a composer.json script names with `--configuration`), so nothing checks null: a `?Customer` reaches `->name()` silently and throws `Error: Call to a member function name() on null` the first time it is null. If the build passes a level on a command line instead, put it in a committed configuration — this check reads configuration, and configuration is all it can read.
What to do
- Raise PHPStan to level 8 (`level: 8` in `phpstan.neon.dist`, or `max`) or Psalm to `errorLevel="3"` or stricter, so `?Type` is a type the checker holds you to; generate a baseline for what that surfaces only to pay it down, not to keep it. Then resolve the baselined nullness errors rather than adding to them: each is a call on a value the checker showed could be null — narrow it (`if ($x === null) { … }`, `?->`, an early return), make the property non-nullable and initialise it in the constructor, or change the return type so the null cannot arrive.
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 71% | Adequate — gated by X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 98% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Maturity | 30% | Weak — gated by D34, M2, M4 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 38% | Weak — gated by P1, P3 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
| Domain Modelling | 83% | Strong | Solid. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — 1 observation(s) recorded · Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
Not evidenced — 2 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 78 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's PHP imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
- AX2 Stateful singletons — Not applicable: PHP builds its object graph per request and shares none of it between requests.
- AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
- AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
- AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — This repository has nothing the runtime tiers could boot or serve — no markup, no UI framework or web-server dependency, no UI component source, no native UI project and no API definition — nothing here is a surface to boot — so runtime a11y/egress/header evidence has no subject here. Not applicable: this is neither a gap in the scan nor a finding about your code.
- AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone, …) or stored credential in a Laravel migration, an Eloquent $fillable/$hidden list or a Doctrine #[ORM\Column] property — and no database client (PDO, mysqli, Laravel's DB facade, $wpdb) in the source either, so this repository keeps no data at rest for these controls to protect.
- C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — this repository registers no route (no Laravel Route::…, no Symfony #[Route], no Filament panel, no WordPress REST route or AJAX action). Access control is therefore N/A here — a Composer library is authorized by the application that mounts it, not by itself. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
- C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone_number, …) or stored credential in a Laravel migration, an Eloquent model's $fillable/$hidden list or a Doctrine #[ORM\Column] property — and no database client (PDO, mysqli, Laravel's DB facade, $wpdb) in the source either, so this repository keeps no sensitive data whose changes an audit trail would record. If it does (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the trail belongs to wherever that data is stored.
- C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone, …) or stored credential in a Laravel migration, an Eloquent $fillable/$hidden list or a Doctrine #[ORM\Column] property — and no database client (PDO, mysqli, Laravel's DB facade, $wpdb) in the source either, so this repository keeps no personal data whose lifetime a retention limit would bound.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone, …) or stored credential in a Laravel migration, an Eloquent $fillable/$hidden list or a Doctrine #[ORM\Column] property — and no database client (PDO, mysqli, Laravel's DB facade, $wpdb) in the source either, so this repository keeps no personal data for a data subject to erase, export or consent over.
- D10 Test Quality — ~3038 lines of test source are present (.php) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
- D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no .php test runner
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- D14 License Compliance — Composer package licences not graded — this repository commits no composer.lock and this pass does not run Composer's solver
- D16 Bus Factor — single-contributor repository — bus factor is not applicable
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Aggregate roots were found in only one source directory (EricksonReyes), which is a layered codebase, not two contexts. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (composer.json — not scanned yet).
- D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — The CI pipeline builds and tests but publishes no released artifact — no package publish, container push, GitHub release or deployment step. Supply-chain provenance, signing and SBOM attest RELEASED artifacts, so there is nothing to attest here. Add them to the release pipeline when this repo starts shipping artifacts (a published package, a container image, a deployed service or a tagged release). Build integrity and workflow-token hygiene are reported below: they describe what the CI runs and the token it runs with, neither of which is affected by whether the pipeline ships an artifact.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (composer.json — not scanned yet).
- D44 Platform End-of-Life — Platform end-of-life not assessed — this repository declares no platform this pass reads
- D5 Coupling — Not applicable — this Composer build ships 1 production module(s), so there is no coupling BETWEEN modules to measure. (Its test and non-production modules are not part of the shipped graph.)
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- D9 Test Distribution — Test source is present (.php) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so its unit/integration/BDD/E2E split couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
- DM10 One transaction, one aggregate — no repository writes detected — no operation to judge against the one-aggregate rule
- DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no id-bearing domain types detected — strongly-typed-id adoption not assessable
- DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
- DM7 Repository granularity — no repository abstraction detected (e.g. uses a document session)
- DM9 Scattered domain decisions — not measured — scattered-decision detection needs expression-level symbol resolution: a comparison operand bound to the member it judges (arm one) and a construction bound to the type it produces (arm two). A Roslyn compilation carries both; arm two alone also runs on any frontend that declares whether a construction is produced or passed, and this target loaded neither
- ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
- ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows only 1 of the 3 signals this lens looks for (a PHP event-sourcing aggregate base (broadway/prooph/EventSauce AggregateRoot))
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- P2 Observability — This repository's PHP source (1 module(s), 91 file(s) read) declares no entry point and bootstraps no server, and nothing here deploys a service — it is a library, run inside whatever hosts it, so production observability (structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks) is N/A. If it grows a binary or a service, the dimension reactivates.
- P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the PHP source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
- P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for PHPBench subjects (`bench*` methods, or `@Subject`/`#[Subject]` ones) in a file importing PhpBench or carrying its annotations, `bench*` methods in a `*Bench.php` file where PHPBench is installed, or phpbench/phpbench in a composer.json or a phpbench.json, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: PHP runs on a garbage-collected runtime that gives a program no allocation-control idiom to choose on a hot path — no pools, stack allocation or value types — so allocation awareness is not something this code can be rated on.
- PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Not applicable: PHP has no async/await function colour, so there is no asynchronous code for a blocking call to stall.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X12 Unreachable branch — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X13 Undrained process stream — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's PHP was read and makes no request a caller can cancel (amphp's HttpClient or connect) — synchronous PHP offers its callers no cancellation to take
- X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check asks whether an argument guard reports an EMPTY value as a NULL one, which needs a language that throws a null-specific argument exception — .NET's ArgumentNullException, the JVM's NullPointerException, Dart's ArgumentError.notNull. This repository contains none of those languages: the ones it is written in have a single exception for a bad argument, so there is no pair of exceptions to confuse and nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — Not applicable: this check looks for a collection written by a callback on one thread while the body waiting on it touches it on another, and in this repository's languages no collection is reachable from two threads at once. PHP gives a request one thread of its own; the event-loop libraries (ReactPHP, Amp) run callbacks one at a time, and ext-parallel copies every value across its channels, so no array or collection is reachable from two threads at once. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 3 finding(s)
- Domain depends on infrastructure: MockBuggedEventHandler spec/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/MockBuggedEventHandler.php:16
- Domain depends on infrastructure: CommandBus src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/CommandBus.php:14
- Domain depends on infrastructure: EventBus src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/EventBus.php:16
Serious — 9 finding(s)
- Inconsistent verb usage for registering handlers. CommandBus uses 'addHandler', while EventBus uses 'register' for both event handlers and exception handlers. This creates confusion about whether 'add' or 'register' is the standard term for binding a handler to a bus.
- Inconsistent method naming for event handling lifecycle. The interface uses 'isInterestedInThis' and 'beNotifiedAbout', which are verbose and grammatically inconsistent ('is' vs 'be'). Mock implementations duplicate this inconsistency.
- Grammatical error and inconsistency in comparison method names. 'amountIsEqualsTo' is grammatically incorrect (should be 'amountIsEqualTo'). Furthermore, the interface 'CanCompareAmount' uses 'amountIsEqualsTo' while the concrete 'Money' class uses 'isEqualsTo' for object comparison, creating two different naming conventions for similar operations.
- Redundant/Inverse methods. 'eventNeverHappened' is logically the inverse of 'eventAlreadyHappened'. Exposing both increases API surface without adding distinct functionality, potentially leading to confusion about which to use.
- Inconsistent naming for containment checks. 'ComposedClass' uses 'has'/'doesntHave' (with a typo 'doesnt' instead of 'doesNot'), while 'ClassExtractor' uses 'contains'. These perform similar logical checks on composition.
- Duplicate intent across concrete class and interface. 'SizeableAndMatchableString' implements 'HasLength' and 'CanCompareLength', but also defines its own length comparison methods directly. This duplicates the interface contract in the concrete class signature, creating redundancy.
- Anemic entity: DomainEntity src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Example/Domain/DomainEntity.php:12
- CI pipeline targets a decommissioned service
- Coverage collected but not gated
Minor — 25 finding(s)
- README/code drift README.md:6
- README/code drift README.md:57
- README/code drift README.md:58
- README/code drift README.md:59
- README/code drift README.md:61
- README/code drift README.md:63
- README/code drift docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD:9
- README/code drift docs/application/EVENT_BUS.MD:32
- README/code drift docs/common/validation/CLASS_COMPOSITION_VALIDATOR.MD:36
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/Money.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/Abstracts/SizeableAndMatchableString.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/Person/FullName.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/File.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/PhoneNumber.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Application/CommandBus.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Domain/EventSourcedEntityTrait.php:1
- Orphaned file src/EricksonReyes/DomainDrivenDesign/Common/ValueObject/Address/Address.php:1
- No ADRs found
- Orphaned files with no living knowledge
- REDACTED
- No ADRs
- No architecture diagram/doc
- No SAST
- No changelog
- PHP static analysis does not check null everywhere
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-dadc16b0309d49359fda9388f47e52f6/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-dadc16b0309d49359fda9388f47e52f6/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 0 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (composer.json — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan. | 0 | — |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D40 · Network Egress Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (composer.json — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |