Executive summary
everest-engineering/lhotse scores 61 out of 100 and is rated Adequate, while seven of its eight lenses score higher still: Event Sourcing and Performance at 100, both rated Exemplary, Architecture at 89, rated Strong, and Code Health and Domain Modelling at 74, Security and Compliance at 70 and Maturity at 62, all rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those seven because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 51 and is rated Adequate. Its Outbound HTTP resilience dimension scores 3 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 Leaked secret finding(s) in REDACTED Scanning and to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 61 to about 68.
25 findings are critical: 23 in Secrets (history), one in REDACTED Scanning and one in Static Analysis (SAST).
Watchdog couldn't measure 20 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Documentation Quality, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 3,290 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €12,000, to rebuild.
If Production Readiness rose from 51 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 61 to about 68.
New since the last survey: 13 findings
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
- Secrets (history) · REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €12,000 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €3,900 to €20,000, for 65 to 207 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | High, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.8 at a score of 61. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Small: 3,290 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 (global) | 2 engineering.everest.lhotse | 3 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.annotations | 4 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests | 5 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses | 6 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security | 7 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay | 8 engineering.everest.lhotse.common | 9 engineering.everest.lhotse.common.exceptions | 10 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands | 11 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events | 12 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries | 13 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n | 14 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions | 15 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos | 16 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events | 17 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands | 18 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events | 19 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services | 20 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config | 21 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest | 22 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation | 23 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain | 24 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config | 25 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence | 26 engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks | 27 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain | 28 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers | 29 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters | 30 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon | 31 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators | 32 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence | 33 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands | 34 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services | 35 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config | 36 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services | 37 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain | 38 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers | 39 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers | 40 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (global) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 engineering.everest.lhotse | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.annotations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 engineering.everest.lhotse.common | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 engineering.everest.lhotse.common.exceptions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain | 5 | 7 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 24 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26 engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 28 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 38 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
20→6 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config.WebSecurityConfig→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security.KeycloakJwtGrantedAuthoritiesConverter
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.security.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.config uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→5 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.ExceptionHandlingControllerAdvice→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.ApiErrorResponse
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
21→14 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.ExceptionHandlingControllerAdvice→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.TranslatableException
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
22→14 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.Validates→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.TranslatableException
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions can break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→10 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.CountVotesAndDeclareOutcomeCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.CreateCompetitionCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.EnterPhotoInCompetitionCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.VoteForPhotoCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionEntryEntity→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.VoteForPhotoCommand
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.commands.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→11 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 7 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionCreatedEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionEndedEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.PhotoEnteredInCompetitionEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionEntryEntity→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.PhotoEntryReceivedVoteEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionVotingCloseoutSaga→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionCreatedEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionVotingCloseoutSaga→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionEndedEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionVotingCloseoutSaga→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionVotingPeriodEndedEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
23→14 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.TranslatableExceptionengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionEntryEntity→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.TranslatableException
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
24→13 engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config.InternationalizationConfig→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.TranslationService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n can break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.config uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
25→15 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence.PersistablePhoto→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.Photo
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
26→7 engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks.PeriodicFilesMarkedForDeletionRemovalTask→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.ReplayCompletionAware
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay can break engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.tasks uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→17 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.ForgottenUserAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands.DeleteAndForgetUserCommand
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands can break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.commands.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27→18 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.ForgottenUserAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.UserDeletedAndForgottenEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→7 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers.ForgottenUsersEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.ReplayCompletionAware
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay can break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.replay.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
28→18 engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers.ForgottenUsersEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.UserDeletedAndForgottenEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.users.eventhandlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→5 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.CompetitionSummaryResponseengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.CompetitionWithEntriesResponseengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.PhotoResponse
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→15 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.Photo
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
29→23 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.Competitionengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionWithEntries
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
30→22 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.CommandValidatingMessageHandlerInterceptor→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.Validates
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.axon uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation can break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.axon uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
31→22 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators.EmailAddressValidator→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.EmailAddressValidatableCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators.EmailAddressValidator→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.Validatesengineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators.FileStatusValidator→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.FileStatusValidatableCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators.FileStatusValidator→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.Validates
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation can break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validators uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
32→23 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.PersistableCompetition→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.Competitionengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.PersistableCompetitionEntry→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionEntry
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
33→22 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands.RegisterUploadedPhotoCommand→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.FileStatusValidatableCommand
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.command.validation.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→8 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.common✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.common.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.DefaultPhotosService→engineering.everest.lhotse.common.RandomFieldsGenerator
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.common, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.common can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.common.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→15 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.DefaultPhotosReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.Photoengineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.Photo
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
34→25 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.DefaultPhotoWriteService→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence.PhotosRepositoryengineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.DefaultPhotosReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence.PhotosRepository
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.persistence.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
35→30 engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config.InterceptorConfig→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.CommandValidatingMessageHandlerInterceptorengineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config.InterceptorConfig→engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.LoggingMessageHandlerInterceptor
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config uses engineering.everest.lhotse.axon, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon can break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.axon.config uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→8 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.common✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.common.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsService→engineering.everest.lhotse.common.RandomFieldsGenerator
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.common, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.common can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.common.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→23 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.Competitionengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionWithEntriesengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.Competitionengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionWithEntries
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→32 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.CompetitionEntriesRepositoryengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsReadService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.CompetitionsRepositoryengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsWriteService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.CompetitionEntriesRepositoryengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsWriteService→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.CompetitionsRepository
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.persistence.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
36→34 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.DefaultCompetitionsService→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosReadService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→14 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.PhotoAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.TranslatableException
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.i18n.exceptions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→16 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.PhotoAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.PhotoDeletedAsPartOfUserDeletionEventengineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.PhotoAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.PhotoUploadedEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→18 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.UserDeletedSaga→engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.UserDeletedAndForgottenEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→33 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.PhotoAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands.DeletePhotoForDeletedUserCommandengineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.PhotoAggregate→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands.RegisterUploadedPhotoCommand
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.commands.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
37→34 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.UserDeletedSaga→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosReadService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→16 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers.PhotosEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.PhotoDeletedAsPartOfUserDeletionEventengineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers.PhotosEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.PhotoUploadedEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
38→34 engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers.PhotosEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosWriteService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→4 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests.CompetitionSubmissionRequestengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests.CreateCompetitionRequestengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.UsersController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests.DeleteAndForgetUserRequest
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.requests.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→5 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.CompetitionSummaryResponseengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.CompetitionWithEntriesResponseengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.PhotosController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.PhotoResponse
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.responses.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→19 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.UsersController→engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services.UsersService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.users.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→29 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverterengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.PhotosController→engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.DtoConverter
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.converters.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→34 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.PhotosController→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosReadServiceengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.PhotosController→engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.PhotosService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.photos.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
39→36 engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsReadServiceengineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers.CompetitionsController→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.api.rest.controllers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→11 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionCreatedEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.CompetitionEndedAndWinnersDeclaredEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.PhotoEnteredInCompetitionEventengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.PhotoEntryReceivedVoteEvent
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.events.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→12 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsQueryHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries.CompetitionWithEntriesQuery
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.queries.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→23 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsQueryHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.CompetitionWithEntries
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.domain.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
40→36 engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a type in engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.
- The types involved
engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsReadServiceengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsEventHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsWriteServiceengineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers.CompetitionsQueryHandler→engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.CompetitionsReadService
- Direction
- engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services, so a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services can break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers, while a change to engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers can't break engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.services.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: engineering.everest.lhotse.competitions.handlers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
At a glance — Domain Modelling
At a glance — Event Sourcing
At a glance — Performance
Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping
| OWASP category | Findings | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| A07:2025 — Authentication Failures | 25 | High / Critical |
| A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration | 3 | Medium |
| A05:2025 — Injection | 1 | High / Critical |
Roadmap
Immediately resolve the leaked secret in the REDACTED file and establish resilience by adding timeouts and retry mechanisms to all outbound HTTP clients. Next, improve test reliability by adding assertions to the identified controller and aggregate tests, and document key architectural decisions with an ADR. Finally, clean up the codebase by removing or updating the twenty orphaned files to ensure knowledge freshness.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolve the 1 Leaked secret finding(s) in REDACTED Scanning — start with REDACTED. | +7.8 pts | Low | REDACTED Scanning |
| Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. | +3.3 pts | Low | ADR Quality |
| Set connect and read timeouts on every client (`RestTemplateBuilder.connectTimeout/readTimeout`, WebClient `responseTimeout`, `HttpRequest.Builder.timeout`, `HttpURLConnection.setReadTimeout`, Feign `connectTimeout`/`readTimeout` in configuration), and wrap calls to dependencies in resilience4j `@Retry`/`@CircuitBreaker`/`@TimeLimiter` (or Spring Retry). | +4.0 pts | Medium | Outbound HTTP resilience |
| Resolve the 28 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with PhotosControllerTest.java (4), PhotoAggregateTest.java (4), CompetitionsControllerTest.java (3). | +3.4 pts | Medium | Test Quality |
| Resolve the 20 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with build.gradle (2), CompetitionAggregate.java, CompetitionsController.java. | +3.3 pts | Medium | Knowledge Freshness |
| Resolve the 26 No direct assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with CompetitionAggregateTest.java (23), CompetitionVotingCloseoutSagaTest.java (3). | +3.2 pts | Medium | Test Quality |
| Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them. | +2.2 pts | Medium | Architecture documentation |
| Add a `healthcheck:` to the served compose service — probing the endpoint it already answers on where it has one — with `depends_on: condition: service_healthy` on whatever waits for it, and keep the deployed image tag immutable and recorded so rolling back is re-pointing at the previous tag rather than rebuilding. | +1.9 pts | Medium | Deployment & Rollback |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDACTED | 4.6 | Mixed | Secrets (history): REDACTED: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.1 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.8 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.8 | Mixed | Secrets (history): REDACTED: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.8 | Mixed | Secrets (history): REDACTED: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.8 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 5.8 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 6.3 | Mixed | IaC & Container Security: Medium IaC: REDACTED |
| src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosControllerTest.java | 7.2 | Mixed | Test Quality: No assertions: getListOfPhotosForAuthenticatedUserWillDelegate |
| src/photos/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/domain/PhotoAggregateTest.java | 7.2 | Mixed | Test Quality: No assertions: emits_WhenPhotoDeletedAsPartOfUserDeletion |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | REDACTED Scanning: Leaked secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| REDACTED | 7.2 | Mixed | Secrets (history): High secret: REDACTED |
| src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CompetitionsControllerTest.java | 7.4 | Mixed | Test Quality: No assertions: adminsCanCreateCompetitions |
| src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/ApplicationFunctionalTests.java | 7.4 | Mixed | Test Quality: No assertions: applicationIsAbleToStart |
| src/command-validation-support/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/command/validators/EmailAddressValidatorTest.java | 7.8 | Mixed | Test Quality: No assertions: validator_WillPass_WhenEmailIsNull |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 68 of 70 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 2 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 70 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 110 of 386 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkov | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 · 3.2.533 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.java) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
- D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability not included — the Java/Kotlin suite (repository root, Gradle) did not finish re-running within its budget: the JVM suite did not finish re-running within its tier budget.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Currency was graded against Maven Central, but whether an artifact is DEPRECATED is not: Maven Central publishes no deprecation marker, exactly as rubygems.org does not. Whether one is UNMAINTAINED is not graded either — no registry publishes a maintenance status, and release age does not stand in for one. Two of this dimension's four signals are therefore unread on a Gradle tree, and its score reflects currency alone.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. All 20 significant source file(s) were last meaningfully changed so long ago that no living knowledge remains — nothing since has been substantial enough to re-establish ownership (a broad, mechanical sweep that touches many files shallowly does not count, and neither does no activity at all). There is no concentration to measure, so the bus factor is not scored. This is not a clean bill: nobody currently holds working knowledge of this code (see D34 Knowledge Freshness). Counted over 20 of the 137 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
- D19 Documentation Quality — LLM provider failed — The model provider returned an unusable result, so this LLM-assisted dimension fell back to a measurement gap (confidence 0) rather than a penalty. Re-run with a reachable provider to score it.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict.
- D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DockerCompose (REDACTED). compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — keycloak Pulling axonserver Pulling postgres Pulling axonserver Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden postgres Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden keycloak Error context canceled Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: keycloak Pulling postgres Pulling axonserver Pulling axonserver Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden postgres Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden keycloak Error context canceled Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped.
- C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
- C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
- C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
- C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
- DM9 Scattered domain decisions — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Arm one resolves each comparison operand to the domain member it judges, and that binding exists only in a Roslyn compilation, which this run did not load. Arm two ran over the neutral model because this repository's frontend declares whether each construction is produced or passed. A rule decided in two places would not appear above.
- ED5 Idempotency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check decides whether a handler's mutation is safe to re-run by recognising its persistence writes (a database save, a repository write, an event publish) and its guards. Those markers are .NET member names, so in this repository's language a write such as `repository.save(order)` is not recognised and a same-named call on an unrelated library type could be. The handlers were found; their idempotency was neither confirmed nor ruled out.
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and no C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby or Scala was found, and this repository's Java is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- M3 Folder & project structure — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Whether the tests sit apart from production code is not visible here, because the suite is not in a form this pass reads. The test-separation credit is granted rather than withheld: this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about the repository's tests. You can widen what we reach: keep the test surface somewhere a reader can find it without opening a binary — an exported/checked-in test source tree beside the production code makes the suite reviewable, diffable and discoverable by tooling.
- P1 CI/CD gates — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. A CI pipeline exists and the word "test" appears, but no explicit test-runner invocation (your stack's test command, or a test job) was matched — so either the gate runs tests through a step this pass could not recognise, or "test" is incidental here (a path, "latest", a reporter). Which of the two it is cannot be settled from this dimension's evidence; the coverage dimensions report whether a suite exists at all. You can widen what we reach: name the test runner explicitly in the pipeline step (your stack's test command, or a job named for the suite) so the gate is unambiguous to a reader and to this pass.
- P8 Schema migrations — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The schema may be created by a runner, a deploy script or a config file outside what this check reads, so an absence here is our blind spot rather than a missing migration strategy. The card abstains instead of scoring. You can widen what we reach: if the schema is created and evolved by a tool this check does not name, naming it lets us teach the detector to read it.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
- X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Kotlin source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Dart, Ruby, Scala or Kotlin was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
- X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Python, PHP, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded, and this repository's Java or Kotlin uses SLF4J, log4j 2 or kotlin-logging but logs through a logger the reading cannot trace to it — a field of a superclass outside the repository, or a logger read off another object — so its log calls cannot be judged, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
- D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
- D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling: Boundary leakage is detected from type references across detected contexts — leaks that flow through primitives, serialization or shared infrastructure may not surface as a typed reference.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- DM6 Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary: Infrastructure reached through a hand-rolled wrapper, a domain-named facade, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-infra type and isn't seen; the body scan is symbol resolution over syntax, not full dataflow. A clean result means "no resolved infra reference in a domain body", not a proof of purity.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
2 duplicated block group(s) detected.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ReplayMarkerAwareTrackingEventProcessorBuilder.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with TranslatableIllegalArgumentException.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D5 · Coupling
18 production modules (Gradle), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; edges a convention plugin adds from buildSrc or build-logic are not visible there; 0 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 17 of the 18 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 19 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D9 · Test Distribution
145 test methods: 145 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e.
D10 · Test Quality
0 skipped, 54 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 145 tests (1 harness-style project(s) excluded from the assertion penalty).
What to do
- Resolve the 28 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with PhotosControllerTest.java (4), PhotoAggregateTest.java (4), CompetitionsControllerTest.java (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (28 warning-level).
- Resolve the 26 No direct assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with CompetitionAggregateTest.java (23), CompetitionVotingCloseoutSagaTest.java (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (26 recommendation-level).
- Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D12 · Dependency Hygiene
This repository's Gradle dependency graph was RESOLVED BY A BUILD, across every subproject rather than the root alone: 300 artifact(s) resolved, 299 of them gradable against Maven Central, and 267 behind a shipped release. Where a version was requested and a different one won conflict resolution, the RESOLVED version is what is graded — grading the request would recommend an upgrade already applied. Known CVEs in the same graph are a separate question again, reported under D30.
What to do
- Enforce Dependency Hygiene in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D13 · REDACTED Scanning
1 secret(s) detected.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Leaked secret finding(s) in REDACTED Scanning — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
- Enforce REDACTED Scanning in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D14 · License Compliance
0 of 29 declared JVM dependency artifact(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from the POMs Maven Central publishes, over the coordinates this repository's 18 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) declare with a version resolvable from the manifest itself — the same declaration-site closure this analysis reads for dependency currency. The JVM has no lockfile a checkout is guaranteed to carry, so this is deliberately NOT the transitive closure.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
1 deducted task-comment markers across 3290 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with PhotosFunctionalTests.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D20 · ADR Quality
No architecture decision records were found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D23 · Boundary Type-Coupling
No domain types leak across context boundaries (3 contexts).
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 17 build units (Gradle) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D28 · Secrets (history)
23 finding(s): 0 critical, 23 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
What to do
- Resolve the 13 High secret finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED (4), REDACTED (3), REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (13 issue-level).
- Resolve the 10 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED (5), REDACTED (4), REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 issue-level).
- Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low. semgrep hit a parse error in 1 file(s) — `gradlew` (line 72, line 178) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
D31 · IaC & Container Security
3 finding(s): 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium, 0 low.
What to do
- Resolve the 3 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
20 of 20 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/competitions/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregate.java. Counted over 20 of the 137 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What to do
- Resolve the 20 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with build.gradle (2), CompetitionAggregate.java, CompetitionsController.java. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (20 recommendation-level).
- Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 103 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AX1 · Captive dependencies
AX10 · Code composition
AX2 · Stateful singletons
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX5 · Architecture & structure
AX6 · Interface segregation
DM1 · Aggregate boundaries
DM10 · One transaction, one aggregate
DM11 · Constructible invalid state
DM12 · Ambient inputs in the domain
DM5 · Encapsulated state
DM6 · Domain ↔ infrastructure boundary
DM7 · Repository granularity
- `PhotosRepository` is a repository over `PersistablePhoto`, which is an entity but not an aggregate root. Repositories should be per aggregate ROOT — loading/saving a child entity independently lets callers bypass the root's invariants. Access `PersistablePhoto` through its owning aggregate instead. — src/photos-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/persistence/PhotosRepository.java:13
- `CompetitionEntriesRepository` is a repository over `PersistableCompetitionEntry`, which is an entity but not an aggregate root. Repositories should be per aggregate ROOT — loading/saving a child entity independently lets callers bypass the root's invariants. Access `PersistableCompetitionEntry` through its owning aggregate instead. — src/competitions-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/persistence/CompetitionEntriesRepository.java:12
- `CompetitionsRepository` is a repository over `PersistableCompetition`, which is an entity but not an aggregate root. Repositories should be per aggregate ROOT — loading/saving a child entity independently lets callers bypass the root's invariants. Access `PersistableCompetition` through its owning aggregate instead. — src/competitions-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/persistence/CompetitionsRepository.java:10
What to do
- Define repositories per aggregate root and keep the query handle inside them; reach child entities through their root so invariants can't be bypassed.
DM8 · Value-object opportunities
DM9 · Scattered domain decisions
ES1 · Fold determinism
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
- Add a README to the 17 of 17 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
M3 · Folder & project structure
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- keycloak/README.md names `kcadm.sh`, but no file or folder `kcadm.sh` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — keycloak/README.md:13
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: keycloak/README.md names `kcadm.sh`, but no file or folder `kcadm.sh` exists.
P1 · CI/CD gates
What to do
- Run the test suite in CI via an explicit runner step (`./gradlew test` for the toolchain this pipeline already uses) and gate merges on it.
P2 · Observability
P3 · Security & performance tooling
What to do
- Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P4 · Deployment & Rollback
- Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a `healthcheck:` and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to — the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse.
What to do
- Add a `healthcheck:` to the served compose service — probing the endpoint it already answers on where it has one — with `depends_on: condition: service_healthy` on whatever waits for it, and keep the deployed image tag immutable and recorded so rolling back is re-pointing at the previous tag rather than rebuilding.
- Add an approval/environment gate (required reviewers / protection rules) before production promotion.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
P7 · Outbound HTTP resilience
- `new RestTemplate(` makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service's request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own — or never, for a client with no default timeout. — src/launcher/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/config/RestTemplateConfig.java:12
What to do
- Set connect and read timeouts on every client (`RestTemplateBuilder.connectTimeout/readTimeout`, WebClient `responseTimeout`, `HttpRequest.Builder.timeout`, `HttpURLConnection.setReadTimeout`, Feign `connectTimeout`/`readTimeout` in configuration), and wrap calls to dependencies in resilience4j `@Retry`/`@CircuitBreaker`/`@TimeLimiter` (or Spring Retry).
PF3 · Async & latency hygiene
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X20 · Mistyped argument guard
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X5 · Nullable reference types
- 0/52 of this repository's Java package directories are under a non-null default: a `package-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked` (JSpecify) or `@NonNullApi`, `@ParametersAreNonnullByDefault`, `@NonNullByDefault`, `@DefaultQualifier(NonNull.class)`; a `module-info.java` declaring `@NullMarked`; every type in it `@NullMarked`; or a build that runs NullAway with the package in `AnnotatedPackages`, or the Checker Framework's `NullnessChecker`. Elsewhere every reference admits null and no checker warns on the dereference that throws a `NullPointerException`.
What to do
- Declare the default where Java declares it: `@NullMarked` (org.jspecify.annotations) in each package's `package-info.java`, or once in `module-info.java`, and run NullAway (Error Prone) or the Checker Framework so the declaration is enforced. Then annotate the real exceptions `@Nullable` and resolve the suppressions rather than adding to them: a `@SuppressWarnings("NullAway")` or `castToNonNull(x)` on a value the checker could show to be null is a `NullPointerException` waiting for the path that makes it true — where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (a null check, `Objects.requireNonNull`, a non-null field initialised in the constructor).
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 74% | Adequate — gated by X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 89% | Strong | Solid. |
| Maturity | 62% | Adequate — gated by D34 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 51% | Adequate — gated by P7 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 70% | Adequate — gated by D28 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Domain Modelling | 74% | Adequate — gated by DM7 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Event Sourcing | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
| Performance | 100% | Exemplary | Solid. |
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — 1 observation(s) recorded · Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
Not evidenced — 4 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 57 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
- AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
- AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- AXR1 Runtime accessibility — compose up failed (exit 18 — an image could not be pulled) — keycloak Pulling axonserver Pulling postgres Pulling axonserver Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden postgres Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden keycloak Error context canceled Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the earlier `compose pull` step reported: keycloak Pulling postgres Pulling axonserver Pulling axonserver Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden postgres Error Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden keycloak Error context canceled Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/": Forbidden; the runtime sandbox reaches registries only through the in-fence pull-through mirror, so an image the mirror does not carry cannot be fetched — this is a limit of our sandbox, not of your stack; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
- C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included
- D16 Bus Factor — dormant codebase — no living knowledge left to concentrate
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D19 Documentation Quality — LLM evaluation failed
- D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.java), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) — not scanned yet).
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — The CI pipeline builds and tests but publishes no released artifact — no package publish, container push, GitHub release or deployment step. Supply-chain provenance, signing and SBOM attest RELEASED artifacts, so there is nothing to attest here. Add them to the release pipeline when this repo starts shipping artifacts (a published package, a container image, a deployed service or a tagged release). Build integrity and workflow-token hygiene are reported below: they describe what the CI runs and the token it runs with, neither of which is affected by whether the pipeline ships an artifact.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) — not scanned yet).
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- DM2 Strongly-typed ids — no id-bearing domain types detected — strongly-typed-id adoption not assessable
- DM3 Integration-event coupling — no integration events detected — coupling check not applicable
- DM4 Rich vs anemic model — no data-bearing entities detected — rich-vs-anemic model not assessable
- ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows only 1 of the 3 signals this lens looks for (3 event handler(s))
- ED5 Idempotency — Not assessed, and this one is on us: 3 command handler(s) or message consumer(s) were found here, but this check does not yet recognise persistence writes in this repository's language. Idempotency was neither confirmed nor ruled out — this is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- ES2 Immutable events — no persisted event types detected — immutability check not applicable
- ES3 PII in the event store — no persisted event types detected — PII-in-events check not applicable
- GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
- P8 Schema migrations — Hibernate, Liquibase is declared, but the schema-migration mechanism could not be identified. Our limit, not a verdict on this repository.
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a pom.xml, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Java code has 3,947 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X12 Unreachable branch — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X13 Undrained process stream — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Java was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Java request off Android takes no token: it is cancelled through the handle it returns (Future.cancel, Call.cancel, a Disposable), ambiently (io.grpc.Context) or by interrupting its thread, not through a parameter
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Critical — 25 finding(s)
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
Serious — 39 finding(s)
- No assertions: adminsCanCreateCompetitions src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CompetitionsControllerTest.java:84
- No assertions: competitionSummariesCanBeListed src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CompetitionsControllerTest.java:100
- No assertions: competitionsCanBeRetrievedInFull src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CompetitionsControllerTest.java:138
- No assertions: allControllerHandlerMethodsHaveMatchingAnnotationAndSignature src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CustomSecurityAnnotationConsistencyTest.java:27
- No assertions: getListOfPhotosForAuthenticatedUserWillDelegate src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosControllerTest.java:96
- No assertions: streamPhotoThumbnail_WillFail_WhenQueryParamsMissing src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosControllerTest.java:157
- No assertions: streamPhoto_WillReturnPhoto src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosControllerTest.java:113
- No assertions: streamProfilePhotoThumbnail_WillReturnProfilePhotoThumbnail src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosControllerTest.java:135
- No assertions: willExposeBuildTimeApplicationVersion src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/VersionControllerTest.java:41
- No assertions: eTagWillBeIncludedInResponseHeaders src/api/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/ETagHeaderTest.java:32
- No assertions: validator_WillPass_WhenEmailIsNull src/command-validation-support/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/command/validators/EmailAddressValidatorTest.java:26
- No assertions: validator_WillPass_WhenEmailLooksSwish src/command-validation-support/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/command/validators/EmailAddressValidatorTest.java:21
- No assertions: validate_WillPassWhenAllFilesExist src/command-validation-support/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/command/validators/FileStatusValidatorTest.java:39
- No assertions: waitAndReturnOrThrow_WillNotSleeperWhenPredicateReturnsTrue src/common/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/common/RetryWithExponentialBackoffTest.java:50
- No assertions: waitOrThrow_WillNotSleeperWhenCallableReturnsSuccess src/common/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/common/RetryWithExponentialBackoffTest.java:86
- No assertions: emitsUserDeletedAndForgottenEvent_WhenUserIsDeletedAndForgotten src/forgotten-users/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/users/domain/ForgottenUserAggregateTest.java:34
- No assertions: applicationIsAbleToStart src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/ApplicationFunctionalTests.java:56
- No assertions: commandValidatingMessageHandlerInterceptorWillBeRegistered src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/ApplicationFunctionalTests.java:64
- No assertions: metricsEndpointPublishesAxonMetrics src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/ApplicationFunctionalTests.java:69
- No assertions: usersCanEnterCompetitionsAndVoteOnEntries src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/CompetitionsFunctionalTests.java:55
- No assertions: canTriggerReplayEvents src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/ReplayFunctionalTests.java:53
- No assertions: retrievingAuthenticatedGetEndpointsWillReturnUnauthorised_WhenUserIsNotAuthenticated src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/SecurityFunctionalTests.java:57
- No assertions: checkForFilesMarkedForDeletionToCleanUp_WillDoNothingWhenAnotherInstanceHasAcquiredLock src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/tasks/PeriodicFilesMarkedForDeletionRemovalTaskTest.java:87
- No assertions: emits_WhenPhotoDeletedAsPartOfUserDeletion src/photos/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/domain/PhotoAggregateTest.java:71
- No assertions: emits_WhenPhotoRegistered src/photos/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/domain/PhotoAggregateTest.java:53
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- REDACTED
- Repository for a non-root entity: PhotosRepository → PersistablePhoto src/photos-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/persistence/PhotosRepository.java:13
- Repository for a non-root entity: CompetitionEntriesRepository → PersistableCompetitionEntry src/competitions-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/persistence/CompetitionEntriesRepository.java:12
- Repository for a non-root entity: CompetitionsRepository → PersistableCompetition src/competitions-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/persistence/CompetitionsRepository.java:10
- TodoComment src/launcher/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/functionaltests/scenarios/PhotosFunctionalTests.java:86
- Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/replay/ReplayMarkerAwareTrackingEventProcessorBuilder.java:33
- Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/i18n-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/i18n/exceptions/TranslatableIllegalArgumentException.java:5
- Coverage collected but not gated
- Outbound HTTP without resilience src/launcher/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/config/RestTemplateConfig.java:12
Minor — 55 finding(s)
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenCompetitionTemporallySane src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:84
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenPhotoEnteredDuringSubmissionPeriod src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:142
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenPhotoReceivesVote src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:197
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenVotesCountedAndASingleWinnerIsDeclared src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:260
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenVotesCountedAndMultipleWinnersAreDeclared src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:267
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenVotesCountedAndNoEntriesWereSubmitted src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:246
- No direct assertions: emits_WhenVotesCountedAndSubmittedEntriesReceivedNoVotes src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:253
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenCountingVotesThatAreAlreadyCounted src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:288
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenMaxEntriesPerPersonReached src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:179
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenNumberOfEntriesPerUserLessThanOne src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:134
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenPhotoAlreadyEnteredInCompetition src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:151
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenPhotoEnteredAfterSubmissionsClose src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:169
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenPhotoEnteredBeforeSubmissionsOpen src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:159
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenPhotoReceivesVoteAndVotingPeriodEnded src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:216
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenPhotoReceivesVoteAndVotingPeriodNotStarted src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:206
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenSubmissionPeriodTooShort src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:116
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenSubmissionsCloseInThePast src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:107
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenSubmissionsOpenAfterSubmissionsClose src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:91
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenSubmitterIsNotOwnerOfPhoto src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:189
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenUserHasVotedForPhotoBefore src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:226
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenVotingEndsBeforeSubmissionsClose src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:99
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenVotingForPhotoNotPartOfCompetition src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:236
- No direct assertions: rejects_WhenVotingPeriodTooShort src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregateTest.java:125
- No direct assertions: onCompetitionCreated_WillScheduleVotingPeriodEndedEvent src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionVotingCloseoutSagaTest.java:45
- No direct assertions: onCompetitionEndedEvent_WillEndSagaLifecycle src/competitions/src/test/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionVotingCloseoutSagaTest.java:61
- Orphaned file src/competitions/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionAggregate.java:1
- Orphaned file src/api/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/CompetitionsController.java:1
- Orphaned file src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/replay/ReplayMarkerAwareTrackingEventProcessor.java:1
- Orphaned file src/api/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/controllers/PhotosController.java:1
- Orphaned file src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/replay/ReplayEndpoint.java:1
- Orphaned file src/api/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/rest/ExceptionHandlingControllerAdvice.java:1
- Orphaned file src/competitions/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/handlers/CompetitionsEventHandler.java:1
- Orphaned file src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/CommandValidatingMessageHandlerInterceptor.java:1
- Orphaned file build.gradle:1
- Orphaned file src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/config/AxonConfig.java:1
- Orphaned file src/launcher/build.gradle:1
- Orphaned file src/common/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/common/RetryWithExponentialBackoff.java:1
- Orphaned file src/axon-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/axon/replay/ReplayMarkerAwareTrackingEventProcessorBuilder.java:1
- Orphaned file src/api/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/api/config/WebSecurityConfig.java:1
- Orphaned file src/photos/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/photos/domain/PhotoAggregate.java:1
- Orphaned file src/database-support/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/config/DatabaseConfig.java:1
- Orphaned file src/launcher/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/tasks/PeriodicFilesMarkedForDeletionRemovalTask.java:1
- Orphaned file src/competitions/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/services/DefaultCompetitionsService.java:1
- Orphaned file src/competitions-persistence/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/services/DefaultCompetitionsWriteService.java:1
- Orphaned file src/competitions/src/main/java/engineering/everest/lhotse/competitions/domain/CompetitionEntryEntity.java:1
- No ADRs found
- REDACTED
- Dormant codebase
- REDACTED
- No ADRs
- README/code drift keycloak/README.md:13
- No rollback/health safety
- No changelog
- Java packages are not null-marked everywhere
Minor — 267 finding(s)
- Outdated (compile): org.projectlombok:lombok
- Outdated (compile): org.axonframework:axon-spring-boot-starter
- Outdated (compile): com.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle
- Outdated (compile): info.picocli:picocli
- Outdated (compile): org.antlr:antlr4-runtime
- Outdated (compile): commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils
- Outdated (compile): commons-collections:commons-collections
- Outdated (compile): com.google.guava:guava
- Outdated (compile): com.google.guava:failureaccess
- Outdated (compile): org.checkerframework:checker-qual
- Outdated (compile): com.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations
- Outdated (compile): com.google.j2objc:j2objc-annotations
- Outdated (compile): org.javassist:javassist
- Outdated (compile): net.sf.saxon:Saxon-HE
- Outdated (compile): org.xmlresolver:xmlresolver
- Outdated (compile): org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient
- Outdated (compile): commons-codec:commons-codec
- Outdated (compile): org.axonframework:axon-messaging
- Outdated (compile): org.slf4j:slf4j-api
- Outdated (compile): com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream
- Outdated (compile): io.github.x-stream:mxparser
- Outdated (compile): xmlpull:xmlpull
- Outdated (compile): net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-java
- Outdated (compile): net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core
- Outdated (compile): com.beust:jcommander
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-6791a28c8bb14182850290e8c0c51284/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 10 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-6791a28c8bb14182850290e8c0c51284/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 1 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy config --format json --quiet . | 3 | artifacts/raw/trivy-config.json |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D40 · Network Egress Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Gradle build (build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |