Public report of google-ai-edge/gallery, published 23 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 23 October 2026, 00:47 UTC · Survey ID cd_4e8fe79c5c1940aeb03125cfbcd8e7dd
google-ai-edge/gallery
Measured 23 October 2026, 00:41 UTC, at code version 8f5f2a0
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
Code coverage is not measured: Suite not runnable in-image and no committed report.
Test distribution is not measured: No automated tests.
CAI scoreWeak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 1 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 79,825 lines of product code in 2 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.5 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 30
Findings by how serious they are
14 critical452 serious26 minor
10 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
23 October 2026, 00:41 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
61of 64 dimensions measured by tools. The other 3 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
474of 492 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 18 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
64dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 79,825 lines of product code in 2 projects.
google-ai-edge/gallery scores 39 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while five of its seven lenses score higher still: Performance at 80, rated Strong, Security and Compliance at 75, Architecture at 74 and Code Health at 65, all rated Adequate, and Maturity at 47, rated Weak.
The score is lower than those five because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 30 and is rated Weak. Its Test Distribution dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution and to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 39 to about 47.
14 findings are critical: six in Static Analysis (SAST), five in Page structure and three in Forms & labels.
Watchdog couldn't measure 9 dimensions in this code, among them Dependency Hygiene, License Compliance and Internal API Consistency, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 79,825 lines, which would take an estimated 0.5 person-years, around €68,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 8 findings
These 8 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 9 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
God Classes · MethodTooLong: GalleryNavGraphKt.CustomTaskScreen Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt
God Classes · ClassTooLong: LlmChatViewModelBase Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html
Rebuild cost: about €68,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€23,000 to €110,000, for 376 to 1,194 hours of work, about 0.5 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 39. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 79,825 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Raises the score by about 3 points · Low effort · ADR Quality
3
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €68,000 to build again, about 0.5 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 30 (Weak). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 8 points for low effort, because it clears the 1 Test Distribution findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 6.5 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 4% to 9% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 57,824 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 234,508 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 22.5 to 135.3 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Code Duplication · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
141 modules, with 185 dependencies between them. 3 loops run through 12 of the modules, marked above the diagonal.
The table shows the 40 modules with the most connections; 101 more are left out to keep it readable.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
Uses a module listed above itPart of a loopThe module itself
3→6 common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTrackerpart of a loop✕
Connections
3 pairs of types, where a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.
common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker, so a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker can break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState, while a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState can't break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
3→15 common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses common.metricspart of a loop✕
Connections
4 pairs of types, where a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses a type in common.metrics.
common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState uses common.metrics, so a change to common.metrics can break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState, while a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState can't break common.metrics.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
data uses com.google.ai.edge.gallery, so a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can break data, while a change to data can't break com.google.ai.edge.gallery.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
common uses com.google.ai.edge.gallery, so a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can break common, while a change to common can't break com.google.ai.edge.gallery.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
1 pair of types, where a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState.
common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState, so a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState can break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker, while a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker can't break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState.
Position
Below the diagonal: common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
6→15 common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses common.metricspart of a loop✕
Connections
1 pair of types, where a type in common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses a type in common.metrics.
common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker uses common.metrics, so a change to common.metrics can break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker, while a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker can't break common.metrics.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
customtasks.common uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.common, while a change to customtasks.common can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
services.semanticretrieval uses data, so a change to data can break services.semanticretrieval, while a change to services.semanticretrieval can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: services.semanticretrieval uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.common.textandvoiceinput uses data, so a change to data can break ui.common.textandvoiceinput, while a change to ui.common.textandvoiceinput can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.common.textandvoiceinput uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
common.metrics uses common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState, so a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState can break common.metrics, while a change to common.metrics can't break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.TurnState.
Position
Below the diagonal: common.metrics uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
common.metrics uses common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker, so a change to common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker can break common.metrics, while a change to common.metrics can't break common.metrics.LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.
Position
Below the diagonal: common.metrics uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.smartalbum, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum uses services.semanticretrieval, so a change to services.semanticretrieval can break customtasks.smartalbum, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum can't break services.semanticretrieval.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
27 pairs of types, where a type in ui.modelmanager uses a type in data. Showing 25 of them; the rest are in namespace-graph.json in this report's bundle.
ui.modelmanager uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break ui.modelmanager, while a change to ui.modelmanager can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.modelmanager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.modelmanager uses ui.common.tos, so a change to ui.common.tos can break ui.modelmanager, while a change to ui.modelmanager can't break ui.common.tos.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.modelmanager uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→19 ui.modelmanager uses com.google.ai.edge.gallerypart of a loop✕
Connections
1 pair of types, where a type in ui.modelmanager uses a type in com.google.ai.edge.gallery.
ui.modelmanager uses com.google.ai.edge.gallery, so a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can break ui.modelmanager, while a change to ui.modelmanager can't break com.google.ai.edge.gallery.
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses data, so a change to data can break com.google.ai.edge.gallery, while a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses common, so a change to common can break com.google.ai.edge.gallery, while a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can't break common.
Position
Below the diagonal: com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break com.google.ai.edge.gallery, while a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: com.google.ai.edge.gallery uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor uses agent.sessions, so a change to agent.sessions can break agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor, while a change to agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor can't break agent.sessions.
Position
Below the diagonal: agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor uses tools, so a change to tools can break agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor, while a change to agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor can't break tools.
Position
Below the diagonal: agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
common.metrics.MetricsTracker uses data, so a change to data can break common.metrics.MetricsTracker, while a change to common.metrics.MetricsTracker can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: common.metrics.MetricsTracker uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
common.metrics.MetricsTracker uses common.metrics, so a change to common.metrics can break common.metrics.MetricsTracker, while a change to common.metrics.MetricsTracker can't break common.metrics.
Position
Below the diagonal: common.metrics.MetricsTracker uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.examplecustomtask uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.examplecustomtask, while a change to customtasks.examplecustomtask can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.examplecustomtask uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.examplecustomtask uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.examplecustomtask, while a change to customtasks.examplecustomtask can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.examplecustomtask uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.examplecustomtask uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.examplecustomtask, while a change to customtasks.examplecustomtask can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.examplecustomtask uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.mobileactions uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.mobileactions, while a change to customtasks.mobileactions can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.mobileactions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.mobileactions uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.mobileactions, while a change to customtasks.mobileactions can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.mobileactions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.mobileactions uses ui.common.textandvoiceinput, so a change to ui.common.textandvoiceinput can break customtasks.mobileactions, while a change to customtasks.mobileactions can't break ui.common.textandvoiceinput.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.mobileactions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.mobileactions uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.mobileactions, while a change to customtasks.mobileactions can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.mobileactions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.scrapbook uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.scrapbook, while a change to customtasks.scrapbook can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.scrapbook uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.scrapbook uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.scrapbook, while a change to customtasks.scrapbook can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.scrapbook uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider uses customtasks.smartalbum, so a change to customtasks.smartalbum can break customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider can't break customtasks.smartalbum.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.DefaultSemanticRetrievalServiceProvider uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker uses customtasks.smartalbum, so a change to customtasks.smartalbum can break customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker can't break customtasks.smartalbum.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumIndexingWorker uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel uses customtasks.smartalbum, so a change to customtasks.smartalbum can break customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel, while a change to customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel can't break customtasks.smartalbum.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.smartalbum.SmartAlbumViewModel uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.videomomentfinder uses data, so a change to data can break customtasks.videomomentfinder, while a change to customtasks.videomomentfinder can't break data.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.videomomentfinder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.videomomentfinder uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.videomomentfinder, while a change to customtasks.videomomentfinder can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.videomomentfinder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.videomomentfinder uses services.semanticretrieval, so a change to services.semanticretrieval can break customtasks.videomomentfinder, while a change to customtasks.videomomentfinder can't break services.semanticretrieval.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.videomomentfinder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.videomomentfinder uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.videomomentfinder, while a change to customtasks.videomomentfinder can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.videomomentfinder uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.common.modelitem uses ui.common.tos, so a change to ui.common.tos can break ui.common.modelitem, while a change to ui.common.modelitem can't break ui.common.tos.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.common.modelitem uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.common.modelitem uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break ui.common.modelitem, while a change to ui.common.modelitem can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.common.modelitem uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.llmsingleturn uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break ui.llmsingleturn, while a change to ui.llmsingleturn can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.llmsingleturn uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.llmsingleturn uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break ui.llmsingleturn, while a change to ui.llmsingleturn can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.llmsingleturn uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.navigation uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break ui.navigation, while a change to ui.navigation can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.navigation uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
agent uses agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor, so a change to agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor can break agent, while a change to agent can't break agent.DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor.
Position
Below the diagonal: agent uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
di uses com.google.ai.edge.gallery, so a change to com.google.ai.edge.gallery can break di, while a change to di can't break com.google.ai.edge.gallery.
Position
Below the diagonal: di uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.common.chat uses agent.sessions, so a change to agent.sessions can break ui.common.chat, while a change to ui.common.chat can't break agent.sessions.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.common.chat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.common.chat uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break ui.common.chat, while a change to ui.common.chat can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.common.chat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.tinygarden uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.tinygarden, while a change to customtasks.tinygarden can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.tinygarden uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.tinygarden uses ui.common.textandvoiceinput, so a change to ui.common.textandvoiceinput can break customtasks.tinygarden, while a change to customtasks.tinygarden can't break ui.common.textandvoiceinput.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.tinygarden uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.tinygarden uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.tinygarden, while a change to customtasks.tinygarden can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.tinygarden uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.tinygarden uses ui.common.chat, so a change to ui.common.chat can break customtasks.tinygarden, while a change to customtasks.tinygarden can't break ui.common.chat.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.tinygarden uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
ui.llmchat uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break ui.llmchat, while a change to ui.llmchat can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: ui.llmchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses customtasks.common, so a change to customtasks.common can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break customtasks.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses agent.sessions, so a change to agent.sessions can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break agent.sessions.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses ui.modelmanager, so a change to ui.modelmanager can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break ui.modelmanager.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses ui.common, so a change to ui.common can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break ui.common.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses ui.common.chat, so a change to ui.common.chat can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break ui.common.chat.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
customtasks.agentchat uses ui.llmchat, so a change to ui.llmchat can break customtasks.agentchat, while a change to customtasks.agentchat can't break ui.llmchat.
Position
Below the diagonal: customtasks.agentchat uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health · 65% · Adequate · gated by D2 ·
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
9
High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
6
Medium
Roadmap
First, resolve the missing test coverage in Test Distribution and establish the absence of Architectural Decision Records by creating initial ADRs. Next, integrate a SAST step into the CI pipeline to automatically fail builds on security regressions. Finally, ensure all design decisions are documented in a dedicated folder and add text alternatives to all images and media elements to improve accessibility.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Make sure a person approves each release. The release job names an environment, but its approval rules live in the code host's settings, where Watchdog can't see them. Check that a reviewer must approve each release, or publish releases as drafts first, so a bad build can be stopped before anyone downloads it.
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 14
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 452
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 26
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 10
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 61 of 64 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 64 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 474 of 492 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The test suite couldn't be built/run in-image and no coverage report is committed, so line coverage was not measured — and it is EXCLUDED from the score rather than scored on a LoC-ratio proxy. No coverage collector was found in your CI either, so there is no existing report to hand us. You can widen what we reach: optional: add a coverage collector to your test run and commit (or publish) its Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov output anywhere in the repo, or make the suite runnable in-image, and real coverage will be measured.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — 3 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) were read, stating a version for 52 dependency(ies) and leaving 9 to a parent or an imported BOM, but no build resolved the dependency graph, so the outdated signal was not established. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict. For npm the surface is what a published package.json's entry points (exports, main, module, types) export, followed through the source; an entry that names build output the tree does not commit (dist/, build/) is not followed back to source, because only a tsconfig outDir/rootDir pair states that mapping and a bundler's input lives in executable configuration this engine does not evaluate.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/Utils.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProcessingConfigDialog.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DataStoreRepository.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelUtils.kt`, … (+4 more) produced a parse error, so every rule in this engine's `gdpr.yml` was absent there. That absence is NOT a clean result: these rules detect personal data crossing a boundary into a log sink, a URL or browser storage, and a file that was never parsed cannot report any of the three. The rest of the tree analysed normally and its rows above stand; only these files are unaccounted for. You can widen what we reach: fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover it.
AX6 Interface segregation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the public interfaces this run's compilations declare, and none was loaded, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Boot via AndroidApp (Android/src/app). the Android app did not build — `./gradlew :app:assembleDebug` exited 1: ugin is not in 'org.gradle' namespace)
- Included Builds (No included builds contain this plugin)
- Plugin Repositories (could not resolve plugin artifact 'com.google.dagger.hilt.android:com.google.da…; runtime evidence skipped (launch chosen because Android/src/app/build.gradle.kts applies the Android application plugin and Android/src/gradlew builds it).
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Kotlin is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Dart, Ruby and Scala source only, and this repository's Kotlin is most of its product and is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
P1 CI/CD gates — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. A CI pipeline exists and the word "test" appears, but no explicit test-runner invocation (your stack's test command, or a test job) was matched — so either the gate runs tests through a step this pass could not recognise, or "test" is incidental here (a path, "latest", a reporter). Which of the two it is cannot be settled from this dimension's evidence; the coverage dimensions report whether a suite exists at all. You can widen what we reach: name the test runner explicitly in the pipeline step (your stack's test command, or a job named for the suite) so the gate is unambiguous to a reader and to this pass.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 59 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 2 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel (cyclomatic 75), SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen (cyclomatic 74). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 5.1 to about 5.5/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 112 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 18 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen (cognitive 182), DownloadWorker.doWork (cognitive 143), DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAllAssets (cognitive 135). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 18 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 2.0 to about 3.5/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes7.2 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 39 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with SmartAlbumScreen.kt (2), LiveMetricsBar.kt (2), VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (39 warning-level).
Resolve the 22 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt, ModelManagerViewModel.kt, ScrapbookViewModel.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (22 warning-level).
Resolve the 10 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with ModelManagerViewModel.kt, ScrapbookViewModel.kt, VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
85 duplicated block group(s) detected. A further 2 rows report members as variants of one another; they aggregate block groups already counted above and are not themselves counted.
+ 36 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 8 Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ScrapbookViewModel.kt (2), McpManagerViewModel.kt, SmartAlbumViewModel.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
Resolve the 6 Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt, MobileActionsScreen.kt, SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Resolve the 6 Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt (2), SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt, SemanticRetrievalService.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
2 production modules (Gradle), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; edges a convention plugin adds from buildSrc or build-logic are not visible there; 0 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 1 of the 2 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 4 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with MainActivity.kt, ScrapbookViewModel.kt, SmartAlbumTask.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 26 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with ChatPanel.kt, ModelManagerViewModel.kt, LlmChatModelHelper.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (26 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D16 · Bus Factor8.1 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").
Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.
45 source file(s) have their living knowledge concentrated in one author (≥90% of recent, decayed contribution). The largest is Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt. Counted over 247 of the 328 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 · ×3
What to do
Resolve the 3 Off-boarding risk finding(s) in Bus Factor. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
10 deducted task-comment markers across 79825 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
Resolve the 10 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with ModelImportDialog.kt (2), FcmMessagingService.kt, SkillTesterBottomSheet.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).
Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository's root README (Google AI Edge Gallery) is clear and well-structured: it introduces the project with a strong value proposition, shows live links to the app store and GitHub release, announces EmbeddingGemma 2 support, and includes an overview table of install options. The Android/README, mcp/README, skills/README, and skills/featured/*.README documents are all READMEs for their own directories (Android/, model_allowlists/, skills/) rather than the repository root, so each is judged only against its own directory's job — they are well written with clear headings, a strong overview, and concrete usage examples. The skill documentation in particular is an excellent reference guide that is clipped mid-sentence but carries its full outline (Introduction, How Skills Work, Text-Only Skills, JS skills, Native skills, Add from Community, Tips and Tricks) — no section is missing.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
1 of 1 build units (Gradle) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
9 finding(s): 0 critical, 6 high, 3 medium, 0 low. 6 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 2 file(s) — `Android/src/app/src/main/assets/tinygarden/main-K5DSW5YL.js`, `Android/src/gradlew` (line 177) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 6 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked. Counted over 247 of the 328 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 8 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with ChatPanel.kt (2), LlmChatViewModel.kt, LlmChatModelHelper.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Change-coupling hub finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with Consts.kt. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
+ 1 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 52 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC1 · Text alternatives2.2 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.
A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content. (×3) — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:359, skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:60, skills/featured/restaurant-roulette/assets/ui.html:159
What to do
Add a text alternative — alt on images (alt="" for purely decorative ones), a title or aria-label on meaningful svg, an aria-label or inner fallback content on canvas, and a captions <track> on video.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC2 · Forms & labels3.9 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.
Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one). (×3) — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:339, skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:343, skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:290
What to do
Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC3 · Page structure4.4 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. (×7) — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:20, skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:20, skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:20, …
The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). — skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:20
A page with no <title> gives no name in the tab, history or screen-reader page list. Add a descriptive <title> in <head>. — skills/featured/mood-music/scripts/index.html:20
user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta. (×3) — skills/featured/restaurant-roulette/assets/ui.html:23, REDACTED:23, skills/featured/virtual-piano/assets/ui.html:23
What to do
Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
`.container` moves (`animation: fadeIn 0.8s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:61
`.mood-card` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:141
`.history-item` moves (`animation: slideIn 0.5s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:226
`.player-container` moves (`animation: fadeIn 0.8s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:69
`.music-icon` moves (`animation: pulse 2s infinite ease-in-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:109
`.progress-fill` moves (`transition: width 0.1s linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:164
`.btn-play` moves (`transition: transform 0.2s,
box-shadow 0.2s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:187
`.btn-play svg` moves (`transition: transform 0.2s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:205
`.playing .bar` moves (`animation: bounce 1.2s infinite ease-in-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:236
What to do
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no accessibility linting at author time and no automated accessibility check in tests or CI. Add your UI toolkit's own accessibility assertion to the test suite (Flutter `meetsGuideline`, Espresso `AccessibilityChecks`, XCTest `performAccessibilityAudit`), then gate that test in the pipeline. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 16 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain your project already uses: assert accessibility in your UI test suite with your toolkit's own matcher (Flutter `meetsGuideline`, Espresso `AccessibilityChecks`, XCTest `performAccessibilityAudit`), then gate that test in CI so a regression blocks the merge.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether singleton services avoid mutable shared instance state that concurrent callers would race on.
Method: Roslyn scan: singleton field mutations unguarded by lock or Interlocked, per type; syntax-based guard detection. Deterministic, traceable per field.
`SkillManager` is a singleton (@Singleton: the container shares one instance across every request thread) but mutates instance state outside any lock (skillLoaded; e.g. `skillLoaded` in `loadSkills` at line 93). — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:78
What to do
Java/Kotlin: keep container singletons stateless — move per-request data into locals or a request-scoped bean — or back the state with java.util.concurrent types (ConcurrentHashMap, AtomicInteger/AtomicReference), guard it with synchronized / a Lock (Kotlin: withLock), or mark a flag that is only ever overwritten volatile (@Volatile).
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 2 of 2 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.
Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.
Tests aren't grouped in a dedicated test folder — the test surface isn't separable from production code at a glance.
What to do
Group tests in the folder your build system expects (tests/, test/, spec/, or your module's test source set) so the test surface is discoverable and CI can scope it.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P1 · CI/CD gates8.5 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Run the test suite in CI via an explicit runner step (`./gradlew test` for the toolchain this pipeline already uses) and gate merges on it.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2377 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: spotbugs with find-sec-bugs — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Make sure a person approves each release. The release job names an environment, but its approval rules live in the code host's settings, where Watchdog can't see them. Check that a reviewer must approve each release, or publish releases as drafts first, so a bad build can be stopped before anyone downloads it.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
Readiness · Performance — Whether the code is written to minimise allocations so it doesn't pressure its host's memory manager — buffer/slice views over copies, object pooling, stack or value-type allocation, and buffer writers. Reward-only: credited where present, never penalised where a simpler style is fine.
Method: Production-source scan: density (per 1k LoC) of allocation-aware APIs — in .NET Span/Memory, ArrayPool/ObjectPool, stackalloc, ValueTask, value-type structs, IBufferWriter, string.Create, SkipLocalsInit; off .NET, with comments and strings blanked, Go's sync.Pool, preallocated slices/maps, Grow, strconv.Append* and buf[:0] reuse; the JVM's NIO buffer views, MemorySegment, primitive collections, pools and literal presizes (plus Kotlin primitive arrays and value classes, Scala AnyVal and @specialized); Swift's reserveCapacity, ContiguousArray, withUnsafe* access and ~Copyable. Activated off .NET on the same floor (400 lines, and benchmarks or 8 uses); Rust and garbage-collected scripting languages are not applicable. Reward-only. Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
What to do
Raise allocation-aware density on the hot paths — currently 94 use(s) across 85,715 production line(s) (~1.1/1k). More of the idioms below on the allocation-heavy paths climbs this toward 10.
Kotlin: on hot paths, use primitive arrays (IntArray, LongArray …) and @JvmInline value classes instead of boxed values, primitive collections (androidx.collection, fastutil) instead of boxed ones, and presize collections and StringBuilders.
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
Other · Security — Only what this repository's own non-C# files could be read for was assessed — markup this repository SHIPS is scored for third-party script integrity whether or not the repository serves it itself, since a page handed to a consumer runs in that consumer’s origin. Nothing else in this dimension was assessed: the transport, cookie, input-validation and crypto controls are read from a source model that was not loaded for this repository’s language, so their absence here is not a finding about this repository.
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
`https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js` is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request — the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path — runs arbitrary script in this page's origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time — the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository. 2 such include(s) across the repository's markup. — skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:26
What to do
Pin third-party scripts and verify them: name an exact version in the URL and add an `integrity="sha384-…"` hash alongside `crossorigin="anonymous"` (both are required — an integrity hash on a cross-origin script without `crossorigin` is not evaluated, it blocks the script). Where the vendor ships a continuously-updated loader and publishes no stable hash (tag managers, analytics, chat widgets), Subresource Integrity is not available: constrain it instead with a `Content-Security-Policy` that names the exact origins allowed to execute, and drop the script from the pages that do not need it. Where the page is shipped inside a package that others host, prefer vendoring the asset and serving it from the app’s own origin, so no consumer inherits a third-party dependency they did not choose.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether suspend functions that make a cancellable request accept or pass on the coroutine's cancellation (adoption curve).
Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.
Only 0/1 suspend functions that make a cancellable request (Ktor, OkHttp newCall, URL streams) accept the coroutine's cancellation or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a screen navigated away from, a disposed widget, a superseded search. In a suspend function, make the request with a call that suspends — Ktor, OkHttp's `executeAsync()`, or a `suspendCancellableCoroutine` that cancels the `Call` — not a blocking `execute()`: `withContext(Dispatchers.IO)` moves the call off the caller's thread but does not make it cancellable; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
`addSkillFromUrl` suspends, but makes its request with `URL(…).openConnection()`, which blocks: its caller's cancellation cannot reach the request, so it runs to its end after whatever wanted it has given up — `withContext(Dispatchers.IO)` moves it off the caller's thread and does not change that. Make the request with a call that suspends: Ktor, OkHttp's `executeAsync()`, or a `suspendCancellableCoroutine` over `enqueue` that cancels the `Call` in `invokeOnCancellation`. — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:199
What to do
Thread the coroutine's cancellation through suspend functions that make requests, so the work stops when its caller gives up.
Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `NullPointerException` (Java, Kotlin, Scala), `ArgumentError.notNull` (Dart) or `ArgumentNullException` (F#'s `nullArg`) tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `for (x in c)` or `c.forEach { … }` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a `mutableListOf`/`ArrayList`, `mutableMapOf`/`HashMap` or `mutableSetOf`/`HashSet` is a `java.util` collection on the JVM and is walked by its own fail-fast iterator, so a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is walking makes the next step throw `ConcurrentModificationException` and the remaining elements are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
`catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. (×11) — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/sessions/SummarizationContextCompactor.kt:193, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpToolCallPermissionDialog.kt:83, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/runtime/aicore/AICoreModelHelper.kt:543, …
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. (×15) — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/ImageUtils.kt:88, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:307, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:311, …
`catch (_: Throwable)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/ConversationSession.kt:66
`catch (e2: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1294
What to do
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether Kotlin's null safety is not undermined by not-null assertions — `String` cannot hold null and `String?` must be checked before use in every Kotlin module, and each `!!` is a run-time `NullPointerException` the author has told the compiler cannot happen.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 13 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (24%; ≈26% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 42 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 2 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 9 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 1 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 52 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No interactive element found in the parsed markup — AC4 not applicable here.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No ARIA usage found in the parsed markup — AC5 not applicable here.
AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: Dagger rejects, at compile time, a component that holds a binding with a narrower scope than its own.
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — the Android app did not build — `./gradlew :app:assembleDebug` exited 1: ugin is not in 'org.gradle' namespace)
- Included Builds (No included builds contain this plugin)
- Plugin Repositories (could not resolve plugin artifact 'com.google.dagger.hilt.android:com.google.da…; runtime evidence skipped (launch chosen because Android/src/app/build.gradle.kts applies the Android application plugin and Android/src/gradlew builds it) This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the app is inaccessible, only that it was never run.
C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Room, JPA or MongoDB entity, an Exposed or Ktorm table, or in a SQL CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Room, Exposed, SQLDelight, Realm, JPA, JDBC, MongoDB, Firebase, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no data at rest for these controls to protect.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named column (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone_number, …) or stored credential on a Room, JPA or MongoDB entity, an Exposed or Ktorm table, or a SQL CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Room, Exposed, SQLDelight, Realm, JPA, JDBC, MongoDB, Firebase, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no sensitive data whose changes an audit trail would record. If it does (through a store configured outside this repository, for instance), the trail belongs to wherever that data is stored.
C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Room, JPA or MongoDB entity, an Exposed or Ktorm table, or in a SQL CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Room, Exposed, SQLDelight, Realm, JPA, JDBC, MongoDB, Firebase, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data whose lifetime a retention limit would bound.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Room, JPA or MongoDB entity, an Exposed or Ktorm table, or in a SQL CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Room, Exposed, SQLDelight, Realm, JPA, JDBC, MongoDB, Firebase, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data for a data subject to erase, export or consent over.
D10 Test Quality — ~63 lines of test code exist on disk but weren't loaded from the analyzed solution (excluded from the .sln, or co-located/using a test attribute not loaded here), so test quality couldn't be assessed. Include the tests in the analyzed solution to enable this check.
D11 Test Reliability — No test suite was found to re-run, so reliability couldn't be assessed. Two searches produced that zero and both came back empty: the classifier that reads the loaded workspace recognised no suite it could run, and a walk of the source on disk — which covers the JS/TS `*.test.*` and `*.spec.*` conventions and probes for a Pester suite — found no test source in any other ecosystem either. Neither search reaches a suite that is missing from the loaded workspace and carries no name either walk recognises, so this is 'no suite found by those two searches', not a verdict that the repository has none.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Not scored — 3 Maven/Gradle manifest(s) were read, stating a version for 52 dependency(ies) and leaving 9 to a parent or an imported BOM, but no build resolved the dependency graph, so the outdated signal was not established. NOT a finding that these dependencies are current or healthy.
D14 License Compliance — Not scored — this repository's 52 declared JVM dependency coordinate(s) were read from its 3 Maven/Gradle manifest(s), but Maven Central could not be asked for the licence of 51 of them (HTTP 429 Too Many Requests from https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/androidx/core/core-ktx/1.15.0/core-ktx-1.15.0.pom), and a licence verdict over part of a dependency graph is not a licence verdict. Nothing is asserted about this repository's licensing in either direction.
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.kt), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — 9 file(s) were not parsed by semgrep — the PII/GDPR ruleset never ran over them
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured
DM1 Domain Modelling — applicable but not scored (2 of 3 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): 128 value object(s); 3 domain event(s); its domain events are published by services or handlers — no domain entity raises one
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C#, F#, JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby and Scala, and none was read for this repository's product. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P2 Observability — This repository's JavaScript/TypeScript, JVM source (2 module(s), 327 file(s) read) declares no entry point and bootstraps no server, and nothing here deploys a service — it is a library, run inside whatever hosts it, so production observability (structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks) is N/A. If it grows a binary or a service, the dimension reactivates.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JVM, JavaScript/TypeScript source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (JaCoCo XML — `mvn jacoco:report` or the Gradle `jacocoTestReport` task) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a pom.xml, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — This check asks whether log calls keep a message's values apart from its text, which needs a logger that can carry them as fields. This repository's Kotlin was read, and it logs through none that an assembled message defeats: Android's `Log` and Timber, java.util.logging and log4j-api-kotlin take one finished message (as log4net does in C#), or it makes no call through a named logger at all. Calls made through SLF4J, log4j 2 or kotlin-logging (`LoggerFactory.getLogger`, `KotlinLogging.logger {}`) would be judged.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
AC2 · Forms & labels· <button> with no accessible text · ×3
<button> with no accessible text skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:339— A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one).
<button> with no accessible text skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:343— A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one).
<button> with no accessible text skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:290— A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one).
Viewport restricts zoom skills/featured/restaurant-roulette/assets/ui.html:23— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
Viewport restricts zoom REDACTED:23— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
Viewport restricts zoom skills/featured/virtual-piano/assets/ui.html:23— user-scalable=no/0 or a maximum-scale below 2 stops low-vision users zooming to 200%. Remove the zoom restriction from the viewport meta.
<html> without a lang skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:20— The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en").
AC3 · Page structure· Document without a <title> · ×1
Document without a <title> skills/featured/mood-music/scripts/index.html:20— A page with no <title> gives no name in the tab, history or screen-reader page list. Add a descriptive <title> in <head>.
MethodTooLong: ClipEditorScreenKt.ClipEditorScreen Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipEditorScreen.kt:97— MethodTooLong — ClipEditorScreen runs 340 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 240 over it, 3.40× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: TinyGardenScreenKt.MainUi Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:220— MethodTooLong — MainUi runs 337 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 237 over it, 3.37× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:281— MethodTooLong — MainUi runs 313 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 213 over it, 3.13× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ProjectDetailsScreenKt.MomentSearchPanel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:663— MethodTooLong — MomentSearchPanel runs 291 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 191 over it, 2.91× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt:148— MethodTooLong — GalleryNavHost runs 257 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 157 over it, 2.57× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:112— MethodTooLong — OptionalComponentsPanel runs 209 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 109 over it, 2.09× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SmartAlbumScreenKt.StartAnalyzingAllPhotosBottomSheet Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:932— MethodTooLong — StartAnalyzingAllPhotosBottomSheet runs 193 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 93 over it, 1.93× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: DownloadWorker.doWork Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt:98— MethodTooLong — doWork runs 184 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 84 over it, 1.84× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ScrapbookViewModel.applyCutoutEdits Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:782— MethodTooLong — applyCutoutEdits runs 177 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 77 over it, 1.77× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:86— MethodTooLong — SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard runs 177 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 77 over it, 1.77× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: BenchmarkScreenKt.BenchmarkScreen Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkScreen.kt:88— MethodTooLong — BenchmarkScreen runs 171 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 71 over it, 1.71× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:632— MethodTooLong — SmartAlbumMainContent runs 169 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 69 over it, 1.69× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AddOrEditSkillBottomSheetKt.ScriptsTabContent Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet.kt:473— MethodTooLong — ScriptsTabContent runs 168 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 68 over it, 1.68× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: LiveMetricsBarKt.resolveLiveMetricsUiState Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/LiveMetricsBar.kt:296— MethodTooLong — resolveLiveMetricsUiState runs 162 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.62× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: McpToolManagerBottomSheetKt.McpToolManagerBottomSheet Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpToolManagerBottomSheet.kt:77— MethodTooLong — McpToolManagerBottomSheet runs 144 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 44 over it, 1.44× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: HfModelDetailsSheetKt.HfModelDetailsContent Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/HfModelDetailsSheet.kt:126— MethodTooLong — HfModelDetailsContent runs 137 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 37 over it, 1.37× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: VideoMomentFinderViewModel.searchForMoment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:692— MethodTooLong — searchForMoment runs 136 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.36× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AllowedModel.toModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt:88— MethodTooLong — toModel runs 134 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 34 over it, 1.34× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ProcessingConfigDialogKt.ProcessingConfigDialog Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProcessingConfigDialog.kt:104— MethodTooLong — ProcessingConfigDialog runs 130 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 30 over it, 1.30× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheetKt.AddSkillFromFeatureListBottomSheet Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:73— MethodTooLong — AddSkillFromFeatureListBottomSheet runs 127 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 27 over it, 1.27× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: LiveMetricsBarKt.LiveMetricsBar Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/LiveMetricsBar.kt:117— MethodTooLong — LiveMetricsBar runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: DefaultDownloadRepository.observerWorkerProgress Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:264— MethodTooLong — observerWorkerProgress runs 124 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 24 over it, 1.24× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.indexSamples Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:350— MethodTooLong — indexSamples runs 120 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 20 over it, 1.20× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.LiveCameraSearchContent Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3022— MethodTooLong — LiveCameraSearchContent runs 120 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 20 over it, 1.20× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SkillManagerBottomSheetKt.SkillItemRow Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:841— MethodTooLong — SkillItemRow runs 117 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.17× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:136— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt changed 12 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 75 in ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel at line 136. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:646— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt changed 33 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 27 in ModelManagerViewModel.deleteModel at line 646. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 31 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:394— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt changed 24 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 23 in LlmChatModelHelper.runInference at line 394. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 22 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt:187— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt changed 16 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 34 in LlmChatViewModelBase.generateResponse at line 187. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 15 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt:90— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt changed 15 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 36 in ModelItemKt.ModelItem at line 90. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt:74— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt changed 12 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 40 in ModelPageAppBarKt.ModelPageAppBar at line 74. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 11 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt:162— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt changed 8 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 54 in MessageInputTextKt.MessageInputText at line 162. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt:88— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt changed 16 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in AllowedModel.toModel at line 88. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 15 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt:105— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt changed 13 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 25 in GlobalModelManagerKt.GlobalModelManager at line 105. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 12 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt:125— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt changed 10 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 32 in AgentChatScreenKt.AgentChatScreen at line 125. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt:131— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt changed 6 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 51 in DownloadAndTryButtonKt.DownloadAndTryButton at line 131. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt:148— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt changed 10 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 28 in GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost at line 148. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt:112— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in ChatViewKt.ChatView at line 112. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt:98— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 43 in DownloadWorker.doWork at line 98. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:112— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt changed 6 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 25 in OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel at line 112. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt:205— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt changed 8 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 17 in ModelNameAndStatusKt.ModelStatusDetails at line 205. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:281— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 29 in MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi at line 281. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:55— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt changed 7 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in DownloadModelPanelKt.DownloadModelPanel at line 55. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:226— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt changed 6 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in LlmChatScreenKt.ChatViewWrapper at line 226. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt:123— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 31 in BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.BenchmarkResultsViewer at line 123. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:160— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 21 in HomeScreenKt.HomeScreen at line 160. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:632— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 23 in SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent at line 632. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:111— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in PromptTemplatesPanelKt.PromptTemplatesPanel at line 111. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt:87— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in ModelListKt.ModelList at line 87. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:264— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in DefaultDownloadRepository.observerWorkerProgress at line 264. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-15..2026-10-13, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-15 15:14:32 -07:00' --until='2026-10-13 15:14:32 -07:00' --full-history --no-merges -- Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
FileTooLong: smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 2356 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1856 over it, 4.71× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt— FileTooLong — 1268 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 88% of them inside a single declaration: ModelManagerViewModel (224-1916). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 768 over it, 2.54× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt— FileTooLong — 1147 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 85% of them inside a single declaration: ScrapbookViewModel (260-1865). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 647 over it, 2.29× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt— FileTooLong — 1005 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 90% of them inside a single declaration: VideoMomentFinderViewModel (167-1628). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 505 over it, 2.01× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt— FileTooLong — 1005 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 90% of them inside a single declaration: DefaultPhotoLibraryService (198-1390). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 505 over it, 2.01× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 915 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 415 over it, 1.83× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 886 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 386 over it, 1.77× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: chat/MessageInputText.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt— FileTooLong — 860 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 360 over it, 1.72× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: scrapbook/CutoutEditor.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutEditor.kt— FileTooLong — 817 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 76% of them inside a single declaration: STATE (209-1127). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 317 over it, 1.63× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt— FileTooLong — 798 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: SmartAlbumViewModel (72-1093). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 298 over it, 1.60× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt— FileTooLong — 759 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 259 over it, 1.52× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt— FileTooLong — 749 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 249 over it, 1.50× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: home/HomeScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 743 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 243 over it, 1.49× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt— FileTooLong — 651 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 62% of them inside a single declaration: val (149-726). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 151 over it, 1.30× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: skills/SkillManager.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt— FileTooLong — 650 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 91% of them inside a single declaration: SkillManager (78-1124). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 150 over it, 1.30× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt— FileTooLong — 625 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 125 over it, 1.25× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: chat/ChatPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt— FileTooLong — 604 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 80% of them inside a single declaration: val (131-878). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 104 over it, 1.21× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 599 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 71% of them inside a single declaration: chatViewJavascriptInterface (121-714). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 99 over it, 1.20× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt— FileTooLong — 548 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 93% of them inside a single declaration: SmartAlbumSearchViewModel (63-768). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 48 over it, 1.10× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: common/ConfigDialog.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt— FileTooLong — 541 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 41 over it, 1.08× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 537 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 37 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt— FileTooLong — 512 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 12 over it, 1.02× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/ImageUtils.kt:88— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:307— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:311— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:314— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:387— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Common.kt:225— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Common.kt:243— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Common.kt:262— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:337— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1147— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1221— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1361— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:1135— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/AudioPlaybackPanel.kt:283— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:221— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/sessions/SummarizationContextCompactor.kt:193— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/ConversationSession.kt:66— `catch (_: Throwable)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpToolCallPermissionDialog.kt:83— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/runtime/aicore/AICoreModelHelper.kt:543— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1025— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1294— `catch (e2: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1386— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:883— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:352— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:374— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:416— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:480— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:506— `catch (e: Exception)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/FcmMessagingService.kt:34— // TODO(developer): Handle FCM messages here. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillTesterBottomSheet.kt:187— // TODO(before launch) — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SecretEditorDialog.kt:66— // TODO: Replace with string resources. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatTaskModule.kt:174— // TODO: inject prompt expander as a dependency. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Model.kt:161— // TODO(jingjin): use a "queue" system to manage model init and cleanup. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:482— // TODO: replace icon. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkViewModel.kt:143— // TODO: handle error. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt:347— // TODO: handle error. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt:160— // TODO: support other types. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt:135— // TODO: maybe consider downloading them in parallel. — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
ClassTooLong: ModelManagerViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:224— ClassTooLong — 1121 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 70 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 721 over it, 2.80× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ScrapbookViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:260— ClassTooLong — 978 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 59 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 578 over it, 2.45× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: VideoMomentFinderViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:167— ClassTooLong — 905 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 23 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 505 over it, 2.26× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: DefaultPhotoLibraryService Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:198— ClassTooLong — 902 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 27 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 502 over it, 2.26× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SmartAlbumViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:72— ClassTooLong — 751 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 46 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 351 over it, 1.88× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SkillManager Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:78— ClassTooLong — 592 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 29 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 192 over it, 1.48× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SmartAlbumSearchViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:63— ClassTooLong — 512 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 36 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 112 over it, 1.28× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ChatViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatViewModel.kt:95— ClassTooLong — 436 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 39 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.09× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SmartAlbumIndexingWorker Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:59— ClassTooLong — 422 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 7 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.06× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SampleAlbumStorageManager Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:52— ClassTooLong — 421 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 17 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 21 over it, 1.05× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard · ×9
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:61— `.container` moves (`animation: fadeIn 0.8s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:141— `.mood-card` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:226— `.history-item` moves (`animation: slideIn 0.5s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:69— `.player-container` moves (`animation: fadeIn 0.8s ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:109— `.music-icon` moves (`animation: pulse 2s infinite ease-in-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:164— `.progress-fill` moves (`transition: width 0.1s linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:187— `.btn-play` moves (`transition: transform 0.2s,
box-shadow 0.2s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:205— `.btn-play svg` moves (`transition: transform 0.2s`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:236— `.playing .bar` moves (`animation: bounce 1.2s infinite ease-in-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Change coupling: LlmChatViewModel.kt ↔ LlmSingleTurnViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnViewModel.kt` change together 85% of the time (11 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 11 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `cd331f6c` Extract LlmProfile from Model.kt into an individual component.; `611456bb` Support thinking mode in the chat panel. This change introduces a new…; `b7eef351` Internal Changes — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: LlmChatModelHelper.kt ↔ LlmSingleTurnViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnViewModel.kt` change together 85% of the time (11 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 11 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `719ec396` Support visual token budget configuration in model settings; `cd331f6c` Extract LlmProfile from Model.kt into an individual component.; `611456bb` Support thinking mode in the chat panel. This change introduces a new… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ChatPanel.kt ↔ Theme.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/theme/Theme.kt` change together 67% of the time (8 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `34c9db9a` Update empty state of various screens.; `b94b5a8e` Re-layout text input to align better with ux design.; `3485c07e` Bug fixes: - Long message cannot be scrolled manually. - Copying mess… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ChatPanel.kt ↔ MessageBodyText.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageBodyText.kt` change together 64% of the time (7 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package — so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `a8e79566` Internal changes; `b7042c8a` Add copy-to-clipboard functionality for chat messages; `593190bf` Update the UI for both the Chat and Prompt Lab to better match the Ge… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ModelImportDialog.kt ↔ ModelManagerViewModel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt` change together 60% of the time (15 of the 25 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package — so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 15 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `99bf9c40` Introduce new "Test-it" task; `5590895a` Internal change only.; `2b4ce578` Use hugging face api to fetch model size. — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: AgentChatScreen.kt ↔ AgentChatTaskModule.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatTaskModule.kt` change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package — so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `cd331f6c` Extract LlmProfile from Model.kt into an individual component.; `9db8cc93` AI Chat: Dynamically enable image and audio support based on model ca…; `735531ba` Temporarily forcing greedy decoding in Agent Chat for better tool cal… — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: AgentChatTaskModule.kt ↔ LlmChatTaskModule.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatTaskModule.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatTaskModule.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt` change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `03f1f0fa` Move Android automatic context compaction setting to task level.; `719ec396` Support visual token budget configuration in model settings; `cd331f6c` Extract LlmProfile from Model.kt into an individual component. — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ModelAllowlist.kt ↔ DownloadModelPanel.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt:1— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt` change together 50% of the time (5 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 5 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `a8e79566` Internal changes; `c90b05cd` Extract BackendSpec and ModelHierarchy from Model.kt into their own c…; `84c90c4b` Refactor `showBenchmarkButton` configuration to `isBenchmarkSupported… — run `git show` on any of them.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:111— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:111-119 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:201-209 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:111` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:685— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:685-693 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:699-707 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:685` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:1717— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:1717-1725 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/Utils.kt:494-502 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:311— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:311-319 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:361-369 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:311` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:148— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:148-156 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1893-1901 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 33 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:148` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/Utils.kt:430— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/Utils.kt:430-438 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/Utils.kt:460-468 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/Utils.kt:430` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/tos/AppTosDialog.kt:58— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/tos/AppTosDialog.kt:58-66 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/tos/GemmaTermsOfUseDialog.kt:64-72 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/tos/AppTosDialog.kt:58` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:462— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:462-470 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:482-490 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:462` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
AC3 · Page structure· Page without a main landmark · ×7
Page without a main landmark skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark skills/featured/mood-music/assets/webview.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark skills/featured/mood-music/scripts/index.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark skills/featured/restaurant-roulette/assets/ui.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark REDACTED:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark skills/featured/virtual-piano/assets/ui.html:20— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
TooManyMethods: ModelManagerViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:224— TooManyMethods — 70 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 40 over it, 2.33× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ScrapbookViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:260— TooManyMethods — 59 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 29 over it, 1.97× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: SmartAlbumViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:72— TooManyMethods — 46 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 16 over it, 1.53× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: DefaultDataStoreRepository Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DataStoreRepository.kt:141— TooManyMethods — 42 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 12 over it, 1.40× the bar. Most of these members implement data.DataStoreRepository (41 of 42 members), so moving them onto a smaller type would remove them from that contract rather than reduce it. To reduce it, split the contract instead: give each cohesive group of operations its own smaller interface and its own implementing type. Where the contract has to stay whole, move the work behind these members into collaborator types, so what is left here is a forward per member rather than a responsibility per member.
TooManyMethods: ChatViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatViewModel.kt:95— TooManyMethods — 39 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 9 over it, 1.30× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: SmartAlbumSearchViewModel Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:63— TooManyMethods — 36 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 6 over it, 1.20× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:152— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:152-167 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:813-828 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:152` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:691— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:691-706 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:650-665 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2664— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2664-2679 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3231-3246 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:730— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:730-745 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:825-840 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallFilledTonalButton.kt:53— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallFilledTonalButton.kt:53-68 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallOutlinedButton.kt:51-66 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallFilledTonalButton.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallOutlinedButton.kt` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/SmallFilledTonalButton.kt:53` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:311— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:311-326 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:406-421 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:311` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2159— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2159-2170 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2192-2203 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2159` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/semanticretrieval/SemanticRetrievalService.kt:135— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/semanticretrieval/SemanticRetrievalService.kt:135-146 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/semanticretrieval/SemanticRetrievalService.kt:272-283 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:281— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:281-292 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:376-387 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:576— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:576-587 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:599-610 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:576` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:494— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:494-505 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:517-528 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:494` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:598— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:598-609 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:759-770 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:598` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:225— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:225-234 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:247-256 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:225` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1792— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1792-1801 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2331-2340 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1792` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2654— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2654-2663 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3210-3219 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2654` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: `Image` names `androidx.compose.foundation.Image` in one and `androidx.compose.material.icons.outlined.Image` in another — different types that share a simple name, which is why the text matched. A single extracted unit cannot be given a parameter type that fits both, so unifying those types (or introducing a shared abstraction over them) is the step that has to come BEFORE the extraction above; if they are deliberately separate, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2652` calls `BorderStroke` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3208` does not — after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/ConversationHistoryPanel.kt:109— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/ConversationHistoryPanel.kt:109-118 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:406-415 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/ConversationHistoryPanel.kt:109` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:95— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:95-104 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:459-468 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:95` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:1056— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:1056-1065 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1743-1752 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2641— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2641-2651 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3198-3208 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2641` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2652` calls `BorderStroke` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3209` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:735— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:735-745 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:751-761 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:735` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:175— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:175-185 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1854-1864 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 33 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:131— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:131-141 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1522-1534 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 33 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:354— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:354-364 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:407-417 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:354` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:681— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:681-697 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutManager.kt:484-500 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:681` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1278— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1278-1294 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2763-2779 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:288— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:288-304 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:335-351 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:288` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatHistorySideSheet.kt:176— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatHistorySideSheet.kt:176-192 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/TextInputHistorySheet.kt:181-197 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatHistorySideSheet.kt:176` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:330— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:330-344 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:471-485 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:330` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:327` calls `DisposableEffect`, `cleanUp` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:468` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:194— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:194-208 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:449-463 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:498— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:498-512 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:675-689 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:498` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnScreen.kt:107— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnScreen.kt:107-121 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt:560-574 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnScreen.kt:107` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Low cohesion: MainActivity (LCOM4 4) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/MainActivity.kt:66— MainActivity's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ScrapbookViewModel (LCOM4 4) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:260— ScrapbookViewModel's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: SmartAlbumTask (LCOM4 4) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumTask.kt:64— SmartAlbumTask's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: DefaultDataStoreRepository (LCOM4 4) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DataStoreRepository.kt:141— DefaultDataStoreRepository's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
AC1 · Text alternatives· <canvas> without a text alternative · ×3
<canvas> without a text alternative skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:359— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
<canvas> without a text alternative skills/built-in/text-spinner/assets/webview.html:60— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
<canvas> without a text alternative skills/featured/restaurant-roulette/assets/ui.html:159— A <canvas> with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can't be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromLocalImportDialog.kt:144— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromLocalImportDialog.kt:144-164 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromUrlDialog.kt:153-173 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromLocalImportDialog.kt:144` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:244— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:244-264 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:407-427 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:244` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:462— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:462-482 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:766-786 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:462` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14–15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188-201 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:168-182 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14–15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:472— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:472-486 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderScreen.kt:121-134 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:472` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14–15 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:822— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:822-836 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:935-948 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:822` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:194— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:194-204 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:405-414 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:194` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:457— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:457-467 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/SettingsDialog.kt:296-305 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:457` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:323— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:323-333 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:347-356 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:323` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox (cyclomatic 18) Android/src/app/src/main/assets/skills/query-wikipedia/scripts/index.html:29— index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox (cyclomatic 18) skills/built-in/query-wikipedia/scripts/index.html:29— index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/assets/skills/query-wikipedia/scripts/index.html:29— index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox (cognitive 17) skills/built-in/query-wikipedia/scripts/index.html:29— index.html.fetchWikiFuzzyAndInfobox has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1236— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1236-1258 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2709-2731 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1236` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: `Image` names `androidx.compose.foundation.Image` in one and `androidx.compose.material.icons.outlined.Image` in another — different types that share a simple name, which is why the text matched. A single extracted unit cannot be given a parameter type that fits both, so unifying those types (or introducing a shared abstraction over them) is the step that has to come BEFORE the extraction above; if they are deliberately separate, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:422— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:422-444 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:475-497 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:422` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (20–21 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:500— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:500-519 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:572-592 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:500` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (20–21 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/AddPictureDropdown.kt:152— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/AddPictureDropdown.kt:152-171 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt:1067-1087 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/AddPictureDropdown.kt:152` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:252— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:252-269 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:379-396 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:252` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1070— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1070-1087 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1187-1204 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1070` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:240— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:240-252 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:262-274 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:240` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:93— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:93-105 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:136-149 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:93` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2639— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2639-2648 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2696-2705 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3196-3205 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2652` calls `BorderStroke` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:3209` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:145— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:145-154 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:199-208 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatTaskModule.kt:162-171 — there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:145` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:688— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:688-694 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:702-708 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:733-739 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:329— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:329-335 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:352-358 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:394-400 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:329` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:321— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:321-327 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:383-389 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerViewModel.kt:321` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:510— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:510-516 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:531-537 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:510` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:874— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:874-878 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:929-933 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:874` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/tools/RunIntentTool.kt:83— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/tools/RunIntentTool.kt:83-87 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/tools/RunMcpTool.kt:173-177 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/tools/RunIntentTool.kt:83` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no accessibility linting at author time and no automated accessibility check in tests or CI. Add your UI toolkit's own accessibility assertion to the test suite (Flutter `meetsGuideline`, Espresso `AccessibilityChecks`, XCTest `performAccessibilityAudit`), then gate that test in the pipeline. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 16 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
Stateful singleton: SkillManager Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:78— `SkillManager` is a singleton (@Singleton: the container shares one instance across every request thread) but mutates instance state outside any lock (skillLoaded; e.g. `skillLoaded` in `loadSkills` at line 93).
ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel (cyclomatic 75) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:136— ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel has cyclomatic complexity 75 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen (cyclomatic 74) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:203— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen has cyclomatic complexity 74 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LiveMetricsBarKt.resolveLiveMetricsUiState (cyclomatic 60) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/LiveMetricsBar.kt:296— LiveMetricsBarKt.resolveLiveMetricsUiState has cyclomatic complexity 60 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
MessageInputTextKt.MessageInputText (cyclomatic 54) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt:162— MessageInputTextKt.MessageInputText has cyclomatic complexity 54 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DownloadAndTryButtonKt.DownloadAndTryButton (cyclomatic 51) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt:131— DownloadAndTryButtonKt.DownloadAndTryButton has cyclomatic complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SkillManagerBottomSheetKt.SkillManagerBottomSheet (cyclomatic 45) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:166— SkillManagerBottomSheetKt.SkillManagerBottomSheet has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumExpandableAnalysisProgressCard (cyclomatic 44) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:353— SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumExpandableAnalysisProgressCard has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
TinyGardenScreenKt.MainUi (cyclomatic 43) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:220— TinyGardenScreenKt.MainUi has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DownloadWorker.doWork (cyclomatic 43) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt:98— DownloadWorker.doWork has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAllAssets (cyclomatic 41) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:752— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAllAssets has cyclomatic complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.processProject (cyclomatic 40) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:1133— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.processProject has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ModelPageAppBarKt.ModelPageAppBar (cyclomatic 40) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt:74— ModelPageAppBarKt.ModelPageAppBar has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ClipEditorScreenKt.ClipEditorScreen (cyclomatic 38) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipEditorScreen.kt:97— ClipEditorScreenKt.ClipEditorScreen has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAsset (cyclomatic 38) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:567— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAsset has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ModelItemKt.ModelItem (cyclomatic 36) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt:90— ModelItemKt.ModelItem has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LlmChatViewModelBase.generateResponse (cyclomatic 34) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt:187— LlmChatViewModelBase.generateResponse has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AgentChatScreenKt.AgentChatScreen (cyclomatic 32) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt:125— AgentChatScreenKt.AgentChatScreen has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
CutoutEditorKt.CutoutEditor (cyclomatic 32) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutEditor.kt:212— CutoutEditorKt.CutoutEditor has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenVideoPlayer (cyclomatic 31) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1944— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenVideoPlayer has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.BenchmarkResultsViewer (cyclomatic 31) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt:123— BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.BenchmarkResultsViewer has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi (cyclomatic 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:281— MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.deleteSamplePhotos (cyclomatic 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:493— SampleAlbumStorageManager.deleteSamplePhotos has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumScreen (cyclomatic 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:162— SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumScreen has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ConfigKt.convertValueToTargetType (cyclomatic 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Config.kt:323— ConfigKt.convertValueToTargetType has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.loadBitmap (cyclomatic 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1153— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.loadBitmap has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost (cyclomatic 28) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt:148— GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ModelManagerViewModel.deleteModel (cyclomatic 27) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:646— ModelManagerViewModel.deleteModel has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ScrapbookViewModel.applyCutoutEdits (cyclomatic 26) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:782— ScrapbookViewModel.applyCutoutEdits has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
CollageEditorKt.CollageEditor (cyclomatic 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:152— CollageEditorKt.CollageEditor has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.MomentSearchPanel (cyclomatic 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:663— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.MomentSearchPanel has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchDetailedAsset (cyclomatic 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:979— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchDetailedAsset has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel (cyclomatic 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:112— OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
GlobalModelManagerKt.GlobalModelManager (cyclomatic 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt:105— GlobalModelManagerKt.GlobalModelManager has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SegmenterKt.Segmenter (cyclomatic 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:112— SegmenterKt.Segmenter has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.getSamplesDirectory (cyclomatic 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:301— SampleAlbumStorageManager.getSamplesDirectory has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ModelManagerViewModel.loadModelAllowlist (cyclomatic 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1275— ModelManagerViewModel.loadModelAllowlist has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent (cyclomatic 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:632— SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
LlmChatModelHelper.runInference (cyclomatic 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:394— LlmChatModelHelper.runInference has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
AllowedModel.toModel (cyclomatic 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt:88— AllowedModel.toModel has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ChatViewKt.ChatView (cyclomatic 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt:112— ChatViewKt.ChatView has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
PromptTemplatesPanelKt.PromptTemplatesPanel (cyclomatic 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:111— PromptTemplatesPanelKt.PromptTemplatesPanel has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
AddMcpServerFromUrlDialogKt.AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog (cyclomatic 21) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:78— AddMcpServerFromUrlDialogKt.AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
AddOrEditSkillBottomSheetKt.AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet (cyclomatic 21) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet.kt:122— AddOrEditSkillBottomSheetKt.AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
HomeScreenKt.HomeScreen (cyclomatic 21) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:160— HomeScreenKt.HomeScreen has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ScrapbookScreenKt.ScrapbookScreen (cyclomatic 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookScreen.kt:96— ScrapbookScreenKt.ScrapbookScreen has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.EmbeddingInfoScreen (cyclomatic 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2222— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.EmbeddingInfoScreen has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Mp4NormalizerKt.remuxToProgressiveMp4 (cyclomatic 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:219— Mp4NormalizerKt.remuxToProgressiveMp4 has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LlmChatModelHelper.initialize (cyclomatic 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:105— LlmChatModelHelper.initialize has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.downloadAndExtractSamples (cyclomatic 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:181— SampleAlbumStorageManager.downloadAndExtractSamples has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SmartAlbumViewModel.observeWorkManagerProgress (cyclomatic 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:280— SmartAlbumViewModel.observeWorkManagerProgress has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ProjectDetailsScreen (cyclomatic 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:186— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ProjectDetailsScreen has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.searchForMoment (cyclomatic 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:692— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.searchForMoment has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ClipTrimmerKt.ClipTrimmer (cyclomatic 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:111— ClipTrimmerKt.ClipTrimmer has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.importVideo (cyclomatic 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:309— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.importVideo has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.queryMediaStoreAssetIds (cyclomatic 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:451— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.queryMediaStoreAssetIds has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.ValueSeriesRow (cyclomatic 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt:860— BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.ValueSeriesRow has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ModelNameAndStatusKt.ModelStatusDetails (cyclomatic 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt:205— ModelNameAndStatusKt.ModelStatusDetails has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
MetricsLogger.buildFirebaseBundle (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/MetricsLogger.kt:243— MetricsLogger.buildFirebaseBundle has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SmartAlbumViewModel.triggerPrioritizedIndexing (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:495— SmartAlbumViewModel.triggerPrioritizedIndexing has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ScrubberAndControls (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:1081— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ScrubberAndControls has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.extractVideoKeyframes (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1064— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.extractVideoKeyframes has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
LlmChatScreenKt.ChatViewWrapper (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:226— LlmChatScreenKt.ChatViewWrapper has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ModelListKt.ModelList (cyclomatic 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt:87— ModelListKt.ModelList has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen (cognitive 182) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:203— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.SmartAlbumSearchScreen has cognitive complexity 182 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 69 (156 pts), boolean chains 19, match/switch 2 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 92). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
DownloadWorker.doWork (cognitive 143) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt:98— DownloadWorker.doWork has cognitive complexity 143 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 34 (103 pts), loops 6 (23 pts), boolean chains 10, error handling 2 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 91). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAllAssets (cognitive 135) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:752— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAllAssets has cognitive complexity 135 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 49 (112 pts), loops 4 (9 pts), error handling 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 73). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MessageInputTextKt.MessageInputText (cognitive 107) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageInputText.kt:162— MessageInputTextKt.MessageInputText has cognitive complexity 107 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 47 (79 pts), boolean chains 11, match/switch 5 (11 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), error handling 2 (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CollageEditorKt.CollageEditor (cognitive 95) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:152— CollageEditorKt.CollageEditor has cognitive complexity 95 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 33 (91 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 60). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
SkillManagerBottomSheetKt.SkillManagerBottomSheet (cognitive 92) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:166— SkillManagerBottomSheetKt.SkillManagerBottomSheet has cognitive complexity 92 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 52 (88 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 37). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi (cognitive 91) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:281— MobileActionsScreenKt.MainUi has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (70 pts), loops 5 (17 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 54). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel (cognitive 88) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatPanel.kt:136— ChatPanelKt.ChatPanel has cognitive complexity 88 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 45 (64 pts), boolean chains 18, loops 3, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DownloadAndTryButtonKt.DownloadAndTryButton (cognitive 87) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/DownloadAndTryButton.kt:131— DownloadAndTryButtonKt.DownloadAndTryButton has cognitive complexity 87 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 41 (69 pts), boolean chains 12, match/switch 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.BenchmarkResultsViewer (cognitive 84) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt:123— BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.BenchmarkResultsViewer has cognitive complexity 84 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 41 (78 pts), loops 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CutoutEditorKt.CutoutEditor (cognitive 80) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutEditor.kt:212— CutoutEditorKt.CutoutEditor has cognitive complexity 80 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 36 (69 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 40). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelPageAppBarKt.ModelPageAppBar (cognitive 73) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPageAppBar.kt:74— ModelPageAppBarKt.ModelPageAppBar has cognitive complexity 73 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (55 pts), boolean chains 10, error handling 2 (4 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAsset (cognitive 72) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:567— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchAsset has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 36 (63 pts), error handling 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 29). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ClipEditorScreenKt.ClipEditorScreen (cognitive 71) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipEditorScreen.kt:97— ClipEditorScreenKt.ClipEditorScreen has cognitive complexity 71 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 50 (64 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost (cognitive 66) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/navigation/GalleryNavGraph.kt:148— GalleryNavGraphKt.GalleryNavHost has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (56 pts), loops 1 (5 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 30). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumExpandableAnalysisProgressCard (cognitive 65) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:353— SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumExpandableAnalysisProgressCard has cognitive complexity 65 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 38 (48 pts), boolean chains 12, match/switch 3, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.processProject (cognitive 63) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:1133— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.processProject has cognitive complexity 63 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 31 (41 pts), error handling 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
LiveMetricsBarKt.resolveLiveMetricsUiState (cognitive 62) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/LiveMetricsBar.kt:296— LiveMetricsBarKt.resolveLiveMetricsUiState has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (35 pts), boolean chains 18, match/switch 8 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SegmenterKt.Segmenter (cognitive 60) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:112— SegmenterKt.Segmenter has cognitive complexity 60 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (46 pts), match/switch 2 (6 pts), loops 1 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.deleteSamplePhotos (cognitive 59) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:493— SampleAlbumStorageManager.deleteSamplePhotos has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (28 pts), error handling 9 (23 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 31). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
TinyGardenScreenKt.MainUi (cognitive 57) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:220— TinyGardenScreenKt.MainUi has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (47 pts), match/switch 5, boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
LlmChatViewModelBase.generateResponse (cognitive 57) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatViewModel.kt:187— LlmChatViewModelBase.generateResponse has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (50 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 26). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.deleteModel (cognitive 57) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:646— ModelManagerViewModel.deleteModel has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (32 pts), loops 5 (13 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 1 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ScrapbookViewModel.applyCutoutEdits (cognitive 56) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:782— ScrapbookViewModel.applyCutoutEdits has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (34 pts), loops 5 (17 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelItemKt.ModelItem (cognitive 52) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelItem.kt:90— ModelItemKt.ModelItem has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (32 pts), boolean chains 16, loops 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel (cognitive 50) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/OptionalComponentsPanel.kt:112— OptionalComponentsPanelKt.OptionalComponentsPanel has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (44 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenVideoPlayer (cognitive 48) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1944— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenVideoPlayer has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (39 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.loadBitmap (cognitive 48) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1153— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.loadBitmap has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (26 pts), error handling 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumScreen (cognitive 47) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:162— SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumScreen has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (40 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.loadModelAllowlist (cognitive 47) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1275— ModelManagerViewModel.loadModelAllowlist has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (36 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.MomentSearchPanel (cognitive 45) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:663— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.MomentSearchPanel has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (41 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
HomeScreenKt.HomeScreen (cognitive 45) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:160— HomeScreenKt.HomeScreen has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (43 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.getSamplesDirectory (cognitive 44) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:301— SampleAlbumStorageManager.getSamplesDirectory has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (36 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AgentChatScreenKt.AgentChatScreen (cognitive 43) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt:125— AgentChatScreenKt.AgentChatScreen has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (31 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (3 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelNameAndStatusKt.ModelStatusDetails (cognitive 43) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/ModelNameAndStatus.kt:205— ModelNameAndStatusKt.ModelStatusDetails has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (38 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 23). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
IntentHandler.readCalendarEvents (cognitive 42) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/intents/IntentHandler.kt:204— IntentHandler.readCalendarEvents has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (38 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CutoutManagerKt.CutoutManager (cognitive 41) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutManager.kt:88— CutoutManagerKt.CutoutManager has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (40 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ScrapbookScreenKt.ScrapbookScreen (cognitive 40) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookScreen.kt:96— ScrapbookScreenKt.ScrapbookScreen has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (34 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
GlobalModelManagerKt.GlobalModelManager (cognitive 39) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/GlobalModelManager.kt:105— GlobalModelManagerKt.GlobalModelManager has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (33 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.EmbeddingInfoScreen (cognitive 38) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2222— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.EmbeddingInfoScreen has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 27 (34 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
PromptTemplatesPanelKt.PromptTemplatesPanel (cognitive 38) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/PromptTemplatesPanel.kt:111— PromptTemplatesPanelKt.PromptTemplatesPanel has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (26 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchDetailedAsset (cognitive 37) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:979— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.fetchDetailedAsset has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (24 pts), boolean chains 8, error handling 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.syncExtraDataAcrossFamily (cognitive 36) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:479— ModelManagerViewModel.syncExtraDataAcrossFamily has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (16 pts), loops 3 (10 pts), error handling 1 (7 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.deleteExtraDataFilesInternal (cognitive 36) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:602— ModelManagerViewModel.deleteExtraDataFilesInternal has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (29 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 24). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AddOrEditSkillBottomSheetKt.AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet (cognitive 35) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet.kt:122— AddOrEditSkillBottomSheetKt.AddOrEditSkillBottomSheet has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (31 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ScrubberAndControls (cognitive 35) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:1081— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ScrubberAndControls has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (33 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ScrapbookViewModel.extractSegmentedObject (cognitive 34) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:1598— ScrapbookViewModel.extractSegmentedObject has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (20 pts), loops 6 (13 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DefaultDownloadRepository.observerWorkerProgress (cognitive 34) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt:264— DefaultDownloadRepository.observerWorkerProgress has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (32 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
LlmChatModelHelper.runInference (cognitive 34) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:394— LlmChatModelHelper.runInference has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (25 pts), error handling 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
AllowedModel.toModel (cognitive 32) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelAllowlist.kt:88— AllowedModel.toModel has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (25 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ModelDownloadingAnimationKt.ModelDownloadingAnimation (cognitive 31) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ModelDownloadingAnimation.kt:50— ModelDownloadingAnimationKt.ModelDownloadingAnimation has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (29 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.queryMediaStoreAssetIds (cognitive 30) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:451— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.queryMediaStoreAssetIds has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), error handling 3 (5 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AddMcpServerFromUrlDialogKt.AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog (cognitive 29) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:78— AddMcpServerFromUrlDialogKt.AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (26 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Mp4NormalizerKt.remuxToProgressiveMp4 (cognitive 28) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:219— Mp4NormalizerKt.remuxToProgressiveMp4 has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), error handling 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.ValueSeriesRow (cognitive 28) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkResultsViewer.kt:860— BenchmarkResultsViewerKt.ValueSeriesRow has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (25 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard (cognitive 27) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:86— SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCardKt.SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 22 (26 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent (cognitive 27) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:632— SmartAlbumScreenKt.SmartAlbumMainContent has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14, boolean chains 9, match/switch 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.downloadAndExtractSamples (cognitive 26) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:181— SampleAlbumStorageManager.downloadAndExtractSamples has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), error handling 3, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.indexUserPhotos (cognitive 26) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:194— SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.indexUserPhotos has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (21 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.indexFallbackAssets (cognitive 26) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.kt:309— SmartAlbumSearchViewModel.indexFallbackAssets has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (20 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.indexSamples (cognitive 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:350— SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.indexSamples has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.importVideo (cognitive 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:309— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.importVideo has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), error handling 5 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ConfigKt.convertValueToTargetType (cognitive 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Config.kt:323— ConfigKt.convertValueToTargetType has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), match/switch 5 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 10). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
SkillManager.saveSkillEdit (cognitive 25) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:640— SkillManager.saveSkillEdit has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (24 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ScrapbookViewModel.segment (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt:314— ScrapbookViewModel.segment has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), loops 1 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
VideoAudioExtractor.pumpOnce (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoAudioExtractor.kt:178— VideoAudioExtractor.pumpOnce has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (23 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
VideoMomentFinderViewModel.searchForMoment (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt:692— VideoMomentFinderViewModel.searchForMoment has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), error handling 3, boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ChatViewKt.ChatView (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt:112— ChatViewKt.ChatView has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (19 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
MessageBodyImageKt.MessageBodyImage (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/MessageBodyImage.kt:37— MessageBodyImageKt.MessageBodyImage has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelListKt.ModelList (cognitive 24) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelList.kt:87— ModelListKt.ModelList has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (23 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SkillTesterBottomSheetKt.SkillTesterBottomSheet (cognitive 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillTesterBottomSheet.kt:68— SkillTesterBottomSheetKt.SkillTesterBottomSheet has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (21 pts), error handling 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumScreenKt.StartAnalyzingAllPhotosBottomSheet (cognitive 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:932— SmartAlbumScreenKt.StartAnalyzingAllPhotosBottomSheet has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (19 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
BenchmarkValueSeriesViewerKt.BenchmarkValueSeriesViewer (cognitive 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/benchmark/BenchmarkValueSeriesViewer.kt:57— BenchmarkValueSeriesViewerKt.BenchmarkValueSeriesViewer has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ZoomableImageKt.ZoomableImage (cognitive 23) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ZoomableImage.kt:63— ZoomableImageKt.ZoomableImage has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (19 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SummarizationContextCompactor.compactContextIfNeeded (cognitive 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/sessions/SummarizationContextCompactor.kt:54— SummarizationContextCompactor.compactContextIfNeeded has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (10 pts), if/else 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenImageViewer (cognitive 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1823— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.FullscreenImageViewer has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (18 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.PhotoGridTile (cognitive 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2686— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.PhotoGridTile has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (18 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
LlmChatScreenKt.ChatViewWrapper (cognitive 22) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatScreen.kt:226— LlmChatScreenKt.ChatViewWrapper has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ClipTrimmerKt.ClipTrimmer (cognitive 21) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ClipTrimmer.kt:111— ClipTrimmerKt.ClipTrimmer has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), error handling 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
HfModelDetailsSheetKt.HfModelDetailsContent (cognitive 21) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/HfModelDetailsSheet.kt:126— HfModelDetailsSheetKt.HfModelDetailsContent has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.extractVideoKeyframes (cognitive 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1064— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.extractVideoKeyframes has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, error handling 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ModelManagerViewModel.createUiState (cognitive 20) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1544— ModelManagerViewModel.createUiState has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 6 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SampleAlbumStorageManager.fetchSampleAssets (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:391— SampleAlbumStorageManager.fetchSampleAssets has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.BackgroundAssetGridTile (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1218— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.BackgroundAssetGridTile has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (16 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SmartAlbumViewModel.observeWorkManagerProgress (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:280— SmartAlbumViewModel.observeWorkManagerProgress has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
Mp4NormalizerKt.isFragmentedMp4 (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/Mp4Normalizer.kt:72— Mp4NormalizerKt.isFragmentedMp4 has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
IntentHandler.scheduleNotification (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/intents/IntentHandler.kt:298— IntentHandler.scheduleNotification has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
RunJsTool.runJs (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/tools/RunJsTool.kt:50— RunJsTool.runJs has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.handleAuthResult (cognitive 19) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1135— ModelManagerViewModel.handleAuthResult has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (18 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumViewModel.onPermissionResult (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:422— SmartAlbumViewModel.onPermissionResult has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumViewModel.triggerPrioritizedIndexing (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:495— SmartAlbumViewModel.triggerPrioritizedIndexing has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 7, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 4). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
SmartAlbumViewModel.observeSampleProgress (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:868— SmartAlbumViewModel.observeSampleProgress has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (SmartAlbumViewModel.observeProgress) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
SmartAlbumViewModel.observeProgress (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumViewModel.kt:913— SmartAlbumViewModel.observeProgress has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (SmartAlbumViewModel.observeSampleProgress) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
HfUrlInfo.parse (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/huggingface/HfModelUtils.kt:200— HfUrlInfo.parse has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (16 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ModelPickerKt.ModelPicker (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ModelPicker.kt:62— ModelPickerKt.ModelPicker has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DownloadModelPanelKt.DownloadModelPanel (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/modelitem/DownloadModelPanel.kt:55— DownloadModelPanelKt.DownloadModelPanel has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
TextAndVoiceInputKt.TextAndVoiceInput (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/textandvoiceinput/TextAndVoiceInput.kt:62— TextAndVoiceInputKt.TextAndVoiceInput has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (18 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
LlmChatModelHelper.initialize (cognitive 18) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmchat/LlmChatModelHelper.kt:105— LlmChatModelHelper.initialize has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10, error handling 4 (5 pts), match/switch 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
MetricsLogger.buildFirebaseBundle (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/MetricsLogger.kt:243— MetricsLogger.buildFirebaseBundle has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (17 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.doWork (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:89— SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.doWork has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (14 pts), error handling 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SmartAlbumMathUtilsKt.getLogSliderMarks (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumMathUtils.kt:49— SmartAlbumMathUtilsKt.getLogSliderMarks has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.PhotoDetailDialog (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1550— SmartAlbumSearchScreenKt.PhotoDetailDialog has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ProjectDetailsScreen (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:186— ProjectDetailsScreenKt.ProjectDetailsScreen has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, boolean chains 3, match/switch 2, loops 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
VideoMomentFinderScreenKt.VideoMomentFinderScreen (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderScreen.kt:78— VideoMomentFinderScreenKt.VideoMomentFinderScreen has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
GemmaEmbeddingModelStore.getDatabasePath (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/semanticretrieval/GemmaEmbeddingModelStore.kt:63— GemmaEmbeddingModelStore.getDatabasePath has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SkillManager.loadSkills (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:93— SkillManager.loadSkills has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ModelManagerViewModel.groupTasksByCategory (cognitive 17) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt:1697— ModelManagerViewModel.groupTasksByCategory has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
McpManagerBottomSheetKt.McpManagerBottomSheet (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:113— McpManagerBottomSheetKt.McpManagerBottomSheet has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ModelUtils.configureVisualTokenBudgetForModel (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelUtils.kt:219— ModelUtils.configureVisualTokenBudgetForModel has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
IntentHandler.handleAction (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/intents/IntentHandler.kt:103— IntentHandler.handleAction has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (9 pts), error handling 3 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
DefaultPhotoLibraryService.createAssetFromUri (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1305— DefaultPhotoLibraryService.createAssetFromUri has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), error handling 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SemanticRetrievalService.retrieveEntitiesInternal (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/semanticretrieval/SemanticRetrievalService.kt:605— SemanticRetrievalService.retrieveEntitiesInternal has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (12 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SkillManager.convertSkillMdToProto (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:984— SkillManager.convertSkillMdToProto has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), match/switch 2 (6 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
HoldToDictateKt.HoldToDictate (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/textandvoiceinput/HoldToDictate.kt:60— HoldToDictateKt.HoldToDictate has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ResponsePanelKt.ResponsePanel (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/ResponsePanel.kt:79— ResponsePanelKt.ResponsePanel has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NotificationsScreenKt.NotificationsScreen (cognitive 16) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/notifications/NotificationsScreen.kt:92— NotificationsScreenKt.NotificationsScreen has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Change-coupling hub: Consts.kt → DownloadRepository.kt, Model.kt, ModelManagerViewModel.kt, DownloadWorker.kt Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Consts.kt— `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Consts.kt` changes together with 4 other files — `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DownloadRepository.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/Model.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/worker/DownloadWorker.kt` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4.
Near-duplicate member pair (89 shared lines) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:198— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:198-348 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:355-514 — These two members are variants of one another: 89 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×1
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:82— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:82-363 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromUrlDialog.kt:67-208 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/SettingsDialog.kt:102-393 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt:114-248 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Duplicated block (48 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:135— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:135-182 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumAnalysisProgressCard.kt:377-424 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (44 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:289— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:289-332 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:455-498 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:289` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (31–32 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:233— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:233-264 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:135-165 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:233` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:166` calls `Box`, `fillMaxSize` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:265` does not — after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (27–29 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1883— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:1883-1911 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2049-2075 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt:2049` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (26 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:604— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:604-629 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:655-680 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/HomeScreen.kt:604` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (24–25 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:719— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:719-742 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt:695-719 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:719` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:219— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:219-242 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:382-405 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumIndexingWorker.kt:219` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (21–22 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:989— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:989-1009 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/notifications/NotificationsScreen.kt:303-324 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:989` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:378— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:378-399 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:403-424 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:378` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:281— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:281-300 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:403-422 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:281` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor.kt:86— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor.kt:86-104 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/agent/DefaultAgentRuntimeExecutor.kt:266-284 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16–17 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:203— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:203-219 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:249-264 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:376-391 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromFeaturedListBottomSheet.kt:203` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14–17 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:640— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:640-656 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1254-1267 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:640` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 4) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:117— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:117-131 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromUrlDialog.kt:91-105 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/home/SettingsDialog.kt:118-132 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelImportDialog.kt:174-188 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:117` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (13–14 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:284— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:284-296 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromLocalImportDialog.kt:155-167 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddSkillFromUrlDialog.kt:163-176 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AddMcpServerFromUrlDialog.kt:284` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (13–14 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:612— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:612-625 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt:1229-1241 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:612` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (12–13 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:236— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:236-247 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt:362-374 — before extracting anything, compare `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt` and `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/SkillManagerBottomSheet.kt` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:236` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188-199 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CutoutManager.kt:137-149 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/Segmenter.kt:168-179 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/CollageEditor.kt:188` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (9–12 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:450— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:450-458 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpToolManagerBottomSheet.kt:158-169 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/McpManagerBottomSheet.kt:450` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (9–11 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:342— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:342-352 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:570-578 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:342` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/MainActivity.kt:96— Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/MainActivity.kt:96-103 | Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/MainActivity.kt:209-216 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/MainActivity.kt:96` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it — the window is that declaration's tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Third-party script without Subresource Integrity skills/built-in/mood-tracker/assets/dashboard.html:26— `https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js` is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request — the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path — runs arbitrary script in this page's origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time — the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository. 2 such include(s) across the repository's markup.
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Suspend function with a blocking request · ×1
Suspend function with a blocking request: addSkillFromUrl Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/skills/SkillManager.kt:199— `addSkillFromUrl` suspends, but makes its request with `URL(…).openConnection()`, which blocks: its caller's cancellation cannot reach the request, so it runs to its end after whatever wanted it has given up — `withContext(Dispatchers.IO)` moves it off the caller's thread and does not change that. Make the request with a call that suspends: Ktor, OkHttp's `executeAsync()`, or a `suspendCancellableCoroutine` over `enqueue` that cancels the `Call` in `invokeOnCancellation`.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt:206— `!isModelInitializing && !uiState.inProgress` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatView.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/llmsingleturn/LlmSingleTurnScreen.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:611— `asset.contentUri.scheme == "file" || asset.contentUri.toString().startsWith("file://")` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt:314— `curDownloadStatus == ModelDownloadStatusType.SUCCEEDED && (!isModelInitialized || uiState.processing)` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/mobileactions/MobileActionsScreen.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/tinygarden/TinyGardenScreen.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:171— `downloadedFileExists || unzippedDirectoryExists` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt:724— `lastProgressPanelMessage != null && lastProgressPanelMessage is ChatMessageCollapsableProgressPanel` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatScreen.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatViewModel.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt:619— `maxDim > targetDimension && targetDimension > 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SampleAlbumStorageManager.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/services/photolibrary/PhotoLibraryService.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt:705— `project.overlapDurationSec >= 0 && project.framesPerWindow > 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProjectDetailsScreen.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/VideoMomentFinderViewModel.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt:364— `showProgressPopup && isIndexingIncomplete && !isCardDismissed` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumScreen.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/smartalbum/SmartAlbumSearchScreen.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt:83— `updatableFile.commitHash.isNotEmpty() && checkIfModelDownloaded(model, updatableFile.commitHash, updatableFile.fileName)` appears character-identically in 2 files — Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/LiteRtLmModelDownloader.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/modelmanager/ModelManagerViewModel.kt. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 — If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 6 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/LitertlmInferenceMetricsTracker.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/MetricsTracker.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/MetricsLogger.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/MemoryMonitor.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/PeriodicSensorMonitor.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/metrics/ConversationSession.kt. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2 — If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/notifications/NotificationsScreen.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/notifications/NotificationScheduleManager.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/agentchat/AgentChatSamplingParamsManager.kt. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #3 — If anonymized user #3 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/chat/ChatMessageMapper.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/FcmMessagingService.kt, Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/common/SteadinessMonitor.kt. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `Android/src/app` (79877 LoC, 884 module-visible types across 48 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
No tests found — No test suite could be collected — no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (JUnit (with Kotest or MockK on Kotlin)) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
M2 · Architecture documentation· No architecture diagram/doc · ×1
No architecture diagram/doc — No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2377 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Not all suspend functions that make a request accept the coroutine's cancellation · ×1
Not all suspend functions that make a request accept the coroutine's cancellation — Only 0/1 suspend functions that make a cancellable request (Ktor, OkHttp newCall, URL streams) accept the coroutine's cancellation or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a screen navigated away from, a disposed widget, a superseded search. In a suspend function, make the request with a call that suspends — Ktor, OkHttp's `executeAsync()`, or a `suspendCancellableCoroutine` that cancels the `Call` — not a blocking `execute()`: `withContext(Dispatchers.IO)` moves the call off the caller's thread but does not make it cancellable; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
Silent fallback default in catch Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/ui/common/ConfigDialog.kt:374— `getTextFieldDisplayValue` swallows every exception into `""` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it propagate. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment in the catch or in the KDoc, and the row stops firing.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. semgrep could not parse 9 file(s) — `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/common/Utils.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/scrapbook/ScrapbookViewModel.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/customtasks/videomomentfinder/ProcessingConfigDialog.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/DataStoreRepository.kt`, `Android/src/app/src/main/java/com/google/ai/edge/gallery/data/ModelUtils.kt`, … (+4 more) — so the PII/GDPR sweep did not cover the unparsed regions of them; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
0
—
Run 01a16635-0cdd-7190-bcd5-a292d07ba3d6 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 14 · Warnings: 452 · Recommendations: 26 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 23-10-2026 @ 00:41 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.