{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC4","name":"Keyboard semantics","shortDescription":{"text":"Keyboard semantics"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC4"},{"id":"AC5","name":"ARIA correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"ARIA correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC5"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX2","name":"Stateful singletons","shortDescription":{"text":"Stateful singletons"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX2"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_voronoi_tessellate (cyclomatic 60): d3.v2.d3_voronoi_tessellate has cyclomatic complexity 60 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 15 of the 60 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function literals inside it that branch (lines 2148, 2122, 2040, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2032}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d496f74cdc75975a0050ecb405ed10ed05f93f8d98a679ded2d2dee9afebdc64"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.svg.brush (cyclomatic 60): d3.v2.d3.svg.brush has cyclomatic complexity 60 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 60 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 4670, brushstart::brushmove, brushstart::move1, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4506}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7749c25b9b260b762e31141053f766b1f66beec4ccdc0cde2293c5c850bbfb7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.treemap (cyclomatic 45): d3.v2.d3.layout.treemap has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 45 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (position, squarify, stickify, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5737}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc74afa295c6978c38a40422513d63c5f1b752f968f1d9173152076ad9e9d03e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph (cyclomatic 41): rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph has cyclomatic complexity 41 (threshold 15). Of this number, 19 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 22 belong to 12 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":382}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eec0507f90ef139b81cc3b7052a50e185626f48ab64d64597116733abc633424"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geo.circle (cyclomatic 28): d3.v2.d3.geo.circle has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (clip, resample, a function literal at line 6343, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f970d278142a1ab1711b08ba7d0765d3fa49623ec9c5aa6fa68fb13cda0930a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geo.path (cyclomatic 25): d3.v2.d3.geo.path has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 25 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 6156, polygonCentroid, a function literal at line 6144, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6080}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e07b0a67f681895b1272b7aaa5220cbfaa499576b7abed612404835e7f4b7420"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.format (cyclomatic 24): d3.v2.d3.format has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 10 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3007}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7324cb2e927b76d006ab9ab13345c339db0eebe5686b2602d5a75f2eff6b4af"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.chord (cyclomatic 22): d3.v2.d3.layout.chord has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (relayout, a function literal at line 5025, a function literal at line 5001, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4928}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e07fc3af48b57f368f71b31de038e05643af161d780a46208f5fba5d16491444"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph.Axis.X (cyclomatic 22): rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph.Axis.X has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 12 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 10 belong to 4 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8444713a5f9fac05decdc26b2d94ea3c452e94c90727f7f587d46b0378b79a94"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_svg_area (cyclomatic 21): d3.v2.d3_svg_area has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (area, a function literal at line 1362, a function literal at line 1327, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":1303}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b8adc5094f35c7b91aeb1c945f8339d26182632004303c7a67a8521c3af7464"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.svg.axis (cyclomatic 21): d3.v2.d3.svg.axis has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 9 function literals inside it that branch (lines 4379, 4486, 4461, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf9c2371de73b84d5038d767067bd32917e62f2ee0f36d86f6e75819e7afdefb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.tree (cyclomatic 21): d3.v2.d3.layout.tree has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (tree::apportion, tree::firstWalk, tree::secondWalk, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5636}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0160f3b233e7720b1d0c400aff783c112413014abbba1d328847bc571058a813"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"rickshaw.Rickshaw.Compat.ClassList (cyclomatic 21): rickshaw.Rickshaw.Compat.ClassList has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function literals inside it that branch (lines 253, 265, 283, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a27031f290da2f38a9838e21f07b304b3006f831b2605dac50745179126eda29"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph.Axis.Y (cyclomatic 20): rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph.Axis.Y has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 10 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 10 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca7428abf6e281462cbcbdf549583a9db537e230e4f4ce043909ad2e23d8546a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.hierarchy (cyclomatic 19): d3.v2.d3.layout.hierarchy has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 19 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (recurse, revalue, a function literal at line 5543, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5504}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3a63a241fcfb9affa88f88e2b0a17c5a6a94dc0533c8d710f2d53aae0966079"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geom.quadtree (cyclomatic 19): d3.v2.d3.geom.quadtree has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 8 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6601}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d9bddbd596635d8f4ee478f514a14c2b2c6a1f16d2abe615958731ac2b08efc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"update (cyclomatic 19): update has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 1776). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1759}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af93d8a7b6efd534c90c50d5cd953ac586c0811a1768d5750348b2a6828cc62a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.interpolateString (cyclomatic 18): d3.v2.d3.interpolateString has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 17 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"071c83e79bde6263113da4ec57325d93db9f149a9a1338239e1f3b5546889d3d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.data (cyclomatic 18): d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.data has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function item inside it that branches (bind). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3725}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7eb29c088514c3b4fb18e1bcd038cfe53aaf9d084f92c434b890c58c7f5e38c2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.behavior.zoom (cyclomatic 17): d3.v2.d3.behavior.zoom has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 17 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (mousedown::mouseup, dispatch, touchstart, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4793}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a1b5f30d6446a5e558f549b83d951c79ca8940f141d083ff4b75e32495d4582"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geom.hull (cyclomatic 17): d3.v2.d3.geom.hull has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56fea1422adc0ef26139c7ae79abecd8bb443def8f398ac93546f2e98db4100a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_layout_packSiblings (cyclomatic 16): d3.v2.d3_layout_packSiblings has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":1620}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"135125145a090be3b22d8d729c2421c9db08a344945c1b8bea54887a716c4cb4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.extent (cyclomatic 16): d3.v2.d3.extent has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2690}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae3b90317a6edc3ddba33cb06b4063981e8e984bd9469b660b9863ada4c0478a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.interpolateTransform (cyclomatic 16): d3.v2.d3.interpolateTransform has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 15 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ce5ed8a1c497c26adc7217867d470bf76f00d8584d44eef23bcae14fdf594d8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geo.azimuthal (cyclomatic 16): d3.v2.d3.geo.azimuthal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (azimuthal, a function literal at line 5889, a function literal at line 5893, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: d3.v2.d3.layout.force (cyclomatic 48) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js holds 20 of the 25 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 199 of the 247 points over it (81%), 4.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js at 44). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5883}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c65f63b9ce11fcd0785ee8e22bf650baa42e8eeb1a008454cb9d8a55b229af99"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_voronoi_tessellate (cognitive 91): d3.v2.d3_voronoi_tessellate has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (52 pts), boolean chains 18, ternaries 9 (15 pts), loops 6 (nesting depth added 28). Of this number, 26 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 65 belong to 11 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2032}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73308d084b3cea3cd1a80e9cf1bde767257bfafeafeb1aeb46f46eef504b6db1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.svg.brush (cognitive 48): d3.v2.d3.svg.brush has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (29 pts), boolean chains 12, ternaries 6 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 48 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (brushstart::brushmove, brushstart::move1, brushstart, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4506}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03ee49295b463e1de7a9cc908a1fcae1c0ec9d4a743f3f9d63791e6d6c2a03a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.treemap (cognitive 48): d3.v2.d3.layout.treemap has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (25 pts), loops 6 (10 pts), ternaries 4 (7 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 17). None of this is in the body itself: all 48 points belong to 12 function items inside it that branch (position, stickify, squarify, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5737}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02e4bede79d41190766f2d5c8034f6d7d91e23502d70fd207b81ce75e7ee36e9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_layout_packSiblings (cognitive 46): d3.v2.d3_layout_packSiblings has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (30 pts), loops 4 (13 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 29). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":1620}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2255e73680944d5858321dcb391053bf431f1c7c1006bc912d844ba9b200e49d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.interpolateString (cognitive 46): d3.v2.d3.interpolateString has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (24 pts), loops 7 (19 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 24). Of this number, 45 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e5dbb98ad9bfc35dc6545bf35c3986793e93b3be29e163a85a238270d89a1f0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geom.quadtree (cognitive 45): d3.v2.d3.geom.quadtree has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (39 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 20). Of this number, 29 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 16 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6601}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9742ceff36376936fcd7efd57961445f745d6ac35990d2f30f52d07c165a02e3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Graph (cognitive 40): Graph has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (19 pts), boolean chains 18, ternaries 3 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 40 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 27 function items inside it that branch (_slice, a function literal at line 447, setSize, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":382}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"383e08fbf479bd87d5b16e62185213c6bb370c22a14e4e4ba7bcee208fe883f5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassList (cognitive 37): ClassList has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (22 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 2 (4 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 16). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 37 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 253, a function literal at line 265, (anonymous)::checkTokenAndGetIndex, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"303b00d49969ca4e697117bc5521299ad9ddc4f60b9e16fab7f9bc70f3e3347f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.extent (cognitive 36): d3.v2.d3.extent has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (24 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2690}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8e17edeaa771976c16cd3cbaa87692f117571e193a3da0236dc2f008d04d6af"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.classed (cognitive 31): d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.classed has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (21 pts), loops 3 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3640}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1925bcf9f4b2dc82aebd43aaef87a9404a1ba1bb7115dd58ff7fc8c5dc168be2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.data::bind (cognitive 29): d3.v2.d3_selectionPrototype.data::bind has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), loops 6 (12 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3726}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16119664372fff4508dfec37d5770585bfa09371e96b0584402fa5d5e66f765f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.tree (cognitive 28): d3.v2.d3.layout.tree has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 9). None of this is in the body itself: all 28 points belong to 7 function items inside it that branch (tree::apportion, tree::firstWalk, tree::secondWalk, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5636}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8dd66da395243a335a71eb9e6a93ef81626959e44a152f979dbaa76a26e54c2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geo.path (cognitive 28): d3.v2.d3.geo.path has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 13 (20 pts), if/else 3 (6 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 10). None of this is in the body itself: all 28 points belong to 15 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 6156, a function literal at line 6144, a function literal at line 6133, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6080}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef565563a0ed70872a386cfa323109109a99334ae29d04b39dae04ef2230bea1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geo.circle (cognitive 28): d3.v2.d3.geo.circle has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 13, if/else 5 (10 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 28 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (clip, resample, a function literal at line 6298, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7353e153074833f4d7f0b4047b4fadda3e24a8d09ece29f780cbd1605a372fcc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.format (cognitive 26): d3.v2.d3.format has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (18 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 3040). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3007}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6707d212143c2ebbd3c9876ef7e3a576bf1f562ac862e3ceb27a5fb84cb3434"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geom.hull (cognitive 25): d3.v2.d3.geom.hull has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), loops 7 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6d00dedd8e7d59563f4748c535fc958f22bde828c503da3f435b6bae9d2519f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.min (cognitive 22): d3.v2.d3.min has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (8 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (d3.v2.d3.max) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2668}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"735a6e73b3905c5b219b0a4a5d5e005552a504e02164a1b8d4abeccb16df5308"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.max (cognitive 22): d3.v2.d3.max has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (8 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (d3.v2.d3.min) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":2679}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a2f8a9de6754e0a99b94d20bf91655038e4612b2949b8d7e345dd03c21ad77f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"X (cognitive 22): X has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, if/else 9 (10 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). None of this is in the body itself: all 22 points belong to 6 function items inside it that branch (render, initialize, _discoverSize, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"427abd1a0f7ce34a588df630ff7782e7a2519fc2900533f7a58b84f85966920b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"update (cognitive 22): update has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), boolean chains 10, loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 1776). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1759}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc689db585db0badaa90ca2dab438296f17dc89612591f5a03a69970c38586d8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.chord::relayout (cognitive 20): d3.v2.d3.layout.chord::relayout has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (9 pts), if/else 4 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":4929}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bba0b388abfe40e3978d8ccd3bec0ce9cc4579629a2909694969a8c10da2b045"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Toggle (cognitive 20): Toggle has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (17 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (addAnchor::onclick, addAnchor::onclick, a function literal at line 1650, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f575a6b866fc76f9d0296553baa2aa97c54861a4132f3c80bc4022c83ec8778d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Y (cognitive 19): Y has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 8 (9 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). None of this is in the body itself: all 19 points belong to 5 function items inside it that branch (initialize, setSize, render, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39cebd09d4fe9de0d158dba3e003d18a74403a99e427f6430a0531108ae2c383"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.layout.hierarchy (cognitive 18): d3.v2.d3.layout.hierarchy has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). None of this is in the body itself: all 18 points belong to 5 function items inside it that branch (recurse, revalue, a function literal at line 5543, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":5504}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49125e5cb23da6ea1acd28351605be3c63d5ffa77872bdebeb1aa9d980d8f5f3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.geom.contour (cognitive 18): d3.v2.d3.geom.contour has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":6393}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87273bfcd52325fdc62335dabd6c3366620802a264c8c0fbe2b129e6092954ba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"d3.v2.d3.interpolateTransform (cognitive 17): d3.v2.d3.interpolateTransform has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2ad605e1ef783c895e6120d1db6b1ce77907c8df03f2d23f28b922c3f898c53"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Annotate (cognitive 16): Annotate has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). None of this is in the body itself: all 16 points belong to 8 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 1137, a function literal at line 1102, add, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1084}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28cc7dbe791e84076bb503da0dffed418b08fcbe2581534ffd57130c8ce68929"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"configure (cognitive 16): configure has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 3, if/else 3 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 2199, 2208). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":2195}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38d633a1936f630ebe7465bb5b603eaff405252dacd5cef0279e05d67c1fb8aa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"initialize (cognitive 16): initialize has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 7, if/else 6, loops 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 15 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":2823}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6db5cc3aa73ae4f8f9cad30ffeeb403eb1372e3e28d9a26b7ad4b34c519e34fd"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: javascripts/d3.v2.js: FileTooLong \u2014 5455 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 4955 over it, 10.91\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f26d37ab36a66291be753f416bb8cd205c07e4c61eea1157ea892b749e99c701"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: javascripts/rickshaw.js: FileTooLong \u2014 1718 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1218 over it, 3.44\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ded9a44862895a26c1283a86a551efd425262d134f58bb4cf87790a8e28541d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: tasks/AWS.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 910 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 410 over it, 1.82\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/AWS.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9a1c5022957bcb0f49046c406d8264e6dbd4fecde5425da9a7ead321f37b23b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: rickshaw.Rickshaw.Graph: FunctionTooLong \u2014 Rickshaw.Graph runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":382}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"272b638d5f206c1b3aa1c4b28c8824d6842316c7b827e98fd55623c5c0a247a5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: rickshaw.Rickshaw.Fixtures.Color: FunctionTooLong \u2014 Rickshaw.Fixtures.Color runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":637}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e02c5e6c8d3bc0637a7e6ef48f6e2fef06aa95ca72a68084daf16b4cf489f54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): riff-raff/app/notification/FailureNotificationContents.scala:66-76 | riff-raff/app/notification/FailureNotificationContents.scala:78-88 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/notification/FailureNotificationContents.scala"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9bfffc5b96125c801df2f235eaf0452725475576f6a29f997d59138eccaa3bc4"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: lib: lib: abstractness 0.15, instability 0.00, distance 0.85 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"809c5da92c88a4a23bd963e01f14fd855be0c8e64872b11f922465a86ef0522c"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: DeployController (LCOM4 15): DeployController\u0027s methods fall into 15 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 15 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/DeployController.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"927248a8215e6bf6870c25b26e046694d8719cf8fc357526cd9bfea5e09568a3"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Testing (LCOM4 8): Testing\u0027s methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/Testing.scala"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b69ddda72e5401d7069e298512e3970dbfcd55e3d83bfde4772760ce720c89e4"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Api (LCOM4 8): Api\u0027s methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/api.scala"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea86afe75fb4a0df32e349c6b3b0bd6b161dd77701e3fc3ccaa31738462f3651"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Application (LCOM4 4): Application\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/Application.scala"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22d70eca8f6ea044fba64348c31eb80c26863226ed9a5ca51d01f71d51afe8a3"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"840c153c6b04cf67332528bce23de7922f08415be942426f77577bed52ad9f93"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a37f34cd5a1318e8943c3b4e48ace54c33164af377f3b7b75ec5aa6f406bf56b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b748f99b32dc24d246ebc33f13eded50a9f7da0f7bce08a44637cb9cf80c9b1b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: riff-raff/app/notification/hooks.scala, riff-raff/app/controllers/HooksController.scala, riff-raff/app/ci/S3Build.scala. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"692d1e51d4f8928ce7c9f44e861bd60a4f748bdc266d7384755ade491151f1e7"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 2 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (5 single-owned of 71 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 71 of the 148 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #2 (1 file(s)), anonymized user #3 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above. The files folded here: magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/UpdateCloudFormationTask.scala, riff-raff/app/lifecycle/ShutdownWhenInactive.scala."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO this is copied from \u0060Lambda.scala\u0060 and could be DRYed out \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/deployment_type/FastlyCompute.scala"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98421833f5ef2ff8ac251d11553ddf1d72a2cbcd22749349a89b4d296ba8b89b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO this is copied from \u0060Lambda.scala\u0060 and could be DRYed out \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/deployment_type/AutoScaling.scala"},"region":{"startLine":250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed4174384c24b255f301d05594f8bbd161ef86c66ce7df8dbfa84425cd0ca965"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO remove this as its not used \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/UpdateCloudFormationTask.scala"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60d8c61fdaa673d21b9965426ef200eaa906dd878c79cf9a15ea967fc58441b7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: these tests regularly fail with \u0060An illegal reflective access \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72fa7723d915103bfda2a9d91ba6f9dfad4f992e890679f09aa69a05c093719c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: these tests regularly fail with \u0060An illegal reflective access \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTasksTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"531f7268ba7dd416cc7bd060c281253fd5ba6eb3869fedc3fabbbe190473ac97"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO is this actually needed? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"project/Helpers.scala"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8694c59ba1a251452305e7e40d065e68f296662ea3ba7cac8c97b45e414d5bde"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO (this would require an upgrade of the management-play lib) \u002B\u002B PlayRequestMetrics.asFilters \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/AppComponents.scala"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eff55fe280ce98444db979798e64e0fabb4c4c4d8ac9a3bbca16fd9d8b12cb0c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Deprecate stringUUID \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/persistence/postgresdb.scala"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9eca611f12832fa3e7c7eace066d69cc72935732c54853d1c31ebbf3776567f"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (27204 LoC, 569 module-visible types across 32 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"315aaeaf0aca6ca4d0d65ac39124395e44f5a110ad8546e6f635cd7cb4ab162d"},"properties":{"commitSha":"d010a00318fe181222b1bc4dfe8223ec19022e2a"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f8ec037acc075a20e987172870dfebba35c29b6ec03152692cc99d955211eeb"},"properties":{"commitSha":"d010a00318fe181222b1bc4dfe8223ec19022e2a"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bb2803ad257f7b693d965bd0d7611457d9eea5bbf2144dbf5c398d9d3c77463"},"properties":{"commitSha":"df6ad5ae77ab9fbfac4b27091867140db0ac058f"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e6335a365fbdbde3f95b44a7a41a9d892a9c4dc12d15f76e8528b6b13687885"},"properties":{"commitSha":"b657aafca8118f8d24e5c015e57ff311eabaabb8"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"229db212c17960912c324a9197593218763165fee3da63e778c289f2d752a1bf"},"properties":{"commitSha":"b657aafca8118f8d24e5c015e57ff311eabaabb8"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10df977a5a9e1a55ca0108ee0bfccddb04da1a2b53daf0cb822a9e54cabcd7e4"},"properties":{"commitSha":"f60093a3011deee7bf53525e5f23a47b31f86161"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b8f11381d61a58459ffc7c595fd52d09c03c711894a63a9578043d2338412b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8148f7c52f2201a063006861b7f7107a3fce0eea269a7ceb83f85c49282b1825"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8343d1853dff57dec53b48ff8b539e02c3ea014cf255c82056ac70cfc53c89bd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e2019435a5b2a0da77aeffa29a505821debb4635fee8ef91de74fcdc6b84cf9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"995aa500fc61de77f2f47e7744467d2835d05bcc6e97906d5b31903f180a2e45"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"236ed077c05fba5b13019011cd0eb7922d420eef3cf3b3d91580bb0f8db00de8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19a837dc59c17f75b3a87df56fc776f8d3918c270879942826a8b7647905b2fb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3090bbbda563ad746bc85d924054c310bf17e8a765bfa411bf9fde14b79eb8f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab8d83539c5ebe567cb6deae98d392d6617f9ea4001a34a9a21fb3f393c0be8f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"568d46b2f9bc75bf31b4049875efb37b28a4a982aca7eb142d31555891ed4662"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ca31963b1af41d75c4d8c62d7979866678ef7a4c7d2734985969c92ddd1d24f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfc1ac86a458eb3a0f57a554f8a6615b22f695f4df70e76b5c229d023a180d65"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"079fd8bd2f437889a38c56498c5bd9b03f906b7b28726d0128c5b5c25b6bebd1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1272e09447a1e677dca6ab1c3f6befddebc02f9f2e3a5b4f97bf47e09850d3c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2260a4d8ed72c1bdc86b520e857346427bdb48b7331116c7229bf5a94243adc6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9fc2b83451f099375a79f8d77938d47e81e71656089a66188c172bef461707d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee76deded0773de0a3c483ee0ca4740dc171036e225434fa0d5daa7c66d15624"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98a127bc282e097622573dae4a3f197d63e893efcc9559c048a6d49bf160c208"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0010f42271f2b592ec50340721ae03a9975e524e5b39f040b7f4abe0301166ea"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"476176a40f7dde5968156df41a3ad51fabec36db7b9ad2c78af7fdee298fccfb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/deploy/dashboard.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d832e9cf11314beaf8f62e025d7697619108559d4c105159e143f81e5767c289"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cimg\u003E without a text alternative: An image with no alt (and no aria-label/aria-labelledby) is unreadable to assistive tech. Add alt \u2014 alt=\u0022\u0022 if it\u0027s purely decorative."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/preview/yaml/loading.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99b6e3dc091299fb50b69332d44de0a1207dafd7c719b2c2efe25f9b7428981a"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cinput\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has no associated label. Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E / wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/deploy/historyFilter.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d1ae7f39ef2403d55349fc24fc45911385d95869deb84837d96cfed9c885b23"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cbutton\u003E with no accessible text: A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/snippets/recordTable.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e134b3bc47f24510f48054f05966d3e6210239bb570f4eddc83ef538a86b639"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Ctextarea\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has no associated label. Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E / wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/validation/validationForm.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1faf19cb8fba3dc51e556b70a52ea5970262cec292a726cf1fff68c157d73a01"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Data table has no header cells: A \u003Ctable\u003E with data cells but no \u003Cth\u003E gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as \u003Cth\u003E (with a scope)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/artifact/listFiles.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7d1badedbd7b74da6e290acee8924e9a4f9f3acecbc729fbb5c16e032925750"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Data table has no header cells: A \u003Ctable\u003E with data cells but no \u003Cth\u003E gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as \u003Cth\u003E (with a scope)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/auth/profile.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0441a69f265be160a47c036f2830e42596afb2e5ea2f2bb1d807065e3b1edcdb"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Heading level jumps from h2 to h4: Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don\u0027t jump levels \u2014 increase by at most one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/continuousDeployment/form.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8ac6ca28cc9d383ed747d27007b70f105865e2f9535430fe446f8cd02f8b892"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Heading level jumps from h2 to h4: Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don\u0027t jump levels \u2014 increase by at most one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/continuousDeployment/list.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4e82318e1e848a69d7d3793a08b002e6c0cd690545c194742c5306a2f3b5670"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Heading level jumps from h2 to h4: Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don\u0027t jump levels \u2014 increase by at most one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/deploy/deployConfirmation.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fa3f637ef9225eaef7451445c356adee2e98df9a68ddb70bbc7e52099776cef"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Data table has no header cells: A \u003Ctable\u003E with data cells but no \u003Cth\u003E gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as \u003Cth\u003E (with a scope)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/deploy/deployConfirmation.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"986c1e71f07223b3f8e91b666b4b590f1fd0f12c8ee7b14622a89bb26e0ff498"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Page without a main landmark: No \u003Cmain\u003E (or role=\u0022main\u0022) means no \u0022skip to content\u0022 target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in \u003Cmain\u003E."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/page.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cae675a0152ee6c83a3bd4c2a7c20e6d419555c666215d5c6ba0ff18647f17f"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Heading level jumps from h2 to h4: Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don\u0027t jump levels \u2014 increase by at most one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/schedule/form.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f5b4926622e28e4f5b91e06ed9027df400dda8dcae6c229a50ff5ba502a7cc8"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Data table has no header cells: A \u003Ctable\u003E with data cells but no \u003Cth\u003E gives assistive technology no way to associate cells with their headers. Mark the header row/column cells as \u003Cth\u003E (with a scope)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/snippets/pimpedBuildId.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4278be77c10b82032ad5cd05f8bf0337be7e2e505548ac95f656a9e28f2e7c8d"}},{"ruleId":"AC4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Modal dialog does not manage focus: This \u003Cdiv role=\u0022dialog\u0022\u003E is a modal dialog, but nothing moves focus into it when it opens and nothing keeps focus inside it while it is open, so a keyboard or screen-reader user keeps acting on the content behind it (WCAG 2.4.3). Use a native \u003Cdialog\u003E opened with showModal(), a dialog component that traps focus, or move focus to the dialog on open, trap Tab inside it (or make the page behind inert) and return focus to the control that opened it on close."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/snippets/changeFreezeDialog.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e60371cf8ee71cab26a81caa94643184efd0b4de2b5acf3ed97405c8b91fc53a"}},{"ruleId":"AC5","level":"error","message":{"text":"aria-hidden hides a focusable element: aria-hidden=\u0022true\u0022 here hides the subtree from assistive tech, but a focusable descendant stays in the tab order \u2014 a keyboard user can land on a control screen readers can\u0027t see. Add inert, take the descendants out of the tab order (tabindex=\u0022-1\u0022), or drop aria-hidden."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/snippets/changeFreezeDialog.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d34b820f59f742828cd7a8371d366c035b1eb3d265248eaca44e4f2408d37dee"}},{"ruleId":"AC5","level":"error","message":{"text":"aria-hidden on a focusable element: aria-hidden=\u0022true\u0022 hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable \u2014 a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/views/snippets/changeFreezeDialog.scala.html"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f71939b17d8635c39d6d93f48e023e2614d77f1f57da4f8addc3a4517107cb3c"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no automated accessibility check runs over the HTML your app renders. Assert the accessibility invariants over that HTML in the test suite you already have (parse the output and assert, or drive a browser), and gate that test in CI so a regression blocks the merge. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 59 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTasksTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"070c08501faec850f3018665ed926017db136a0e151267187059a3fa752635a2"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":273}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d8b4eda2b1fcca12bc3cc919ce0480f5ce7fb25ee254fb424d36024427f2e06"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":296}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e71ca101d7b1f2f40244896b3ccd2e2738fd042bedaf685d297f76ee28a7d9cb"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"297c5351b875ea2bada7d680a8c57cb5b9152b61ee6d6a9d6c3718203ebbdac9"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/test/scala/magenta/tasks/ASGTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":352}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ab4d7340ffbf4d4a48ff7f38c3d3ebb443f951d297f37e3a6c1b51745910ccd"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Blanket warning suppression: A bare \u0060// scalastyle:off\u0060, \u0060// scalafix:off\u0060 or \u0060@nowarn\u0060 (or Wartremover\u0027s \u0060warts.All\u0060) switches every rule or warning off \u2014 hidden debt. Suppress the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/utils/Retriable.scala"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1cf3e749db84d6838e4ba9c56591c1c39c37971c4b53685da7313c50e7a47e2"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/reference/riff-raff.yaml.md links to \u0060/configuration/validation\u0060, but \u0060configuration/validation\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/reference/riff-raff.yaml.md"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cff666328e0defe9d27af136ae7b79e7425ee807a0df7e3d01088fd4323346a7"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md links to \u0060externalRequest\u0060, but \u0060riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/externalRequest\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf47031473fb4a860a86e4b2097a927437a051c40c4ce9b674aeb4b5d8d64fb5"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md names \u0060api/deploy/request\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060api/deploy/request\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e066ce0d85c9cacb435605fe2b4e4b81352de0e11802adaf65475cfe18057b32"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md names \u0060api/deploy/stop\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060api/deploy/stop\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffbc593e7c5d310c70e134363b2104e61c868c6b4340136e7f870a9b189a23e4"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md names \u0060api/deployinfo\u0060, but no file or folder \u0060api/deployinfo\u0060 exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api.md"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"978e57966dd83e4890d9914323a9056ce32d846c37897accb1ba06b821662ebf"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/hooksAndCD.md links to \u0060api\u0060, but \u0060riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/api\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/hooksAndCD.md"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b5a617299fac96866c64a510361885526fa409ddd19b1e9f3e27a41909e5d6e"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/administration/auth.md links to \u0060These\u0060, but \u0060riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/administration/These\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/docs/riffraff/administration/auth.md"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32ed9366fd562afa4d2829dad9fc4326802a665e396b94211f86ef389cbecde0"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Security headers incomplete: Set: Strict-Transport-Security. Missing: Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options \u2014 the four headers that carry the points of this card\u0027s security-headers term (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options), 0.5 each.(\u22121.5 on this card.) The server: build.sbt:90 \u2014 the \u0060PlayScala\u0060 plugin."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9931804dbad8b1657857c9b88c05b8faeff182b6e2bb88641bd59bac687876e"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060v==null?\u0022\u0022:v\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3692}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91dee0495d407526d518415958dc01b8cf497dd9a59422b0c31bee1914cdbd84"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060value\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/d3.v2.js"},"region":{"startLine":3696}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e11e23478ee95341bcb3114443f7780d8b8ea62a67fe98a8345fe07be1b6794f"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060box.content\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2972c0a752d5e485f62d22a613d52723a93e41314e80c5d2b6cabf9a47c7187"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060o.unit.formatter(new Date(o.value*1000))\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a18377ef3286b8a4e606551f7bf14648440424a07b061a8b019dae057513aa1"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060formattedXValue\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1884}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f35d2f1857415649d79096b910c2e96e39dbbe9230f66ef032005cce28fd57a4"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060this.formatter(point.series,point.value.x,point.value.y,formattedXValue,formattedYValue,point)\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1890}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05d3ec2fdc9cdb431770eaa868c24f537208822bbc0307bee515f4016954fc45"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060series.name\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":1992}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8de2cf5e7d0dc63512dd4a003145e6cfaa6326d9855bce476ad452ddd313f2e5"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060case e: Exception\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/DeployController.scala"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac6cddfd28964202c0f8bd14f0776b2fdbdd4434f892b77d78b45bd86543bd79"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/public/javascripts/rickshaw.js"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9baf4e0d75e20eaa52e5d0571541c28303c80b4cd31285b572e2297626ce2dd0"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warn\u0060 at line 62 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.warn(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/package.scala"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fd738ef8dae8b442b9f319b19417813ab227efbf420e65caabc56dcd637008f"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 203 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/deployment_type/CloudFormation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0df5d07f7eeaf6dbbee33fafbc85c0756219fdf6c514de8dab33bf114bc49d5"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060debug\u0060 at line 117 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.debug(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/tasks.scala"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c4131cd5e983159af5e75c19ddb42b3104b434e8b2d11d7f09b5088d02d7387"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060debug\u0060 at line 168 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.debug(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/tasks.scala"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b970be76a84d21258d7157d9b51d6ad9ac1a3d4f18a05dd06ea5094fd81ab94"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 409 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/UpdateCloudFormationTask.scala"},"region":{"startLine":409}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f835acc1a4060ec6aa9b216f7db1b074598819f35ee7586d5f8a69002e3af3f"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060debug\u0060 at line 458 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.debug(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/UpdateCloudFormationTask.scala"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"049910945f189b7d39a5a0ad73ccb6d0d50f54311846fdd808629b3b7503470a"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 1083 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/AWS.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1083}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9de232f5ccdd9d0399e2e11fb4a50eaf1023b6e0c71ee5baf23e86c6087d5203"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 1120 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/AWS.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31ec160782f87b24720437aa02a042f54a6ac3ca5b0ae4919296359d088b8e8d"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 1123 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/AWS.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98d3532b97a495dec19e62ec3a335baaa7ea4860200c85336ef68920fea61b8b"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warn\u0060 at line 1151 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.warn(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/AWS.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8cb5b48f2cb79a1ee8f76e6d9200dee459d9671a48183b8c906b191838387f2"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060warn\u0060 at line 30 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.warn(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"magenta-lib/src/main/scala/magenta/tasks/autoscaling/CullSummary.scala"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c164328156d074527fa908e72c9989464db84ce24db425ddc6b6bce22e1e71bd"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 77 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/controllers/PreviewController.scala"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510617b3edc27c5dd7f7dddc8fde9f25cb9b754ee332070c617df6ffa1d097d3"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 35 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/deployment/preview/PreviewCoordinator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f611dfcbfb038b609fcc8bbf6a46af0290b55dc055aed496dcd5881f8c790970"}},{"ruleId":"X4","level":"note","message":{"text":"Interpolated log message defeats structured logging: \u0060info\u0060 at line 54 is handed an interpolated string as its message through SLF4J, so the logger receives one finished string \u2014 the values in it cannot be queried, filtered or aggregated as fields, every occurrence reads as a different message, and the string is built even when the level is filtered out. Pass a constant pattern and the values beside it instead: \u0060log.info(\u0022Order {} moved to {}\u0022, orderId, status)\u0060, which keeps the pattern and its arguments apart on the event for a structured encoder (logstash-logback-encoder, OpenTelemetry), or \u0060log.atInfo().addKeyValue(\u0022order_id\u0022, orderId).log(\u0022order moved\u0022)\u0060 with SLF4J 2\u0027s fluent API. scala-logging\u0027s \u0060LazyLogging\u0060 logger takes an \u0060s\u0022\u2026\u0022\u0060 message apart into that pattern at compile time, so switching to it is also a fix."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"riff-raff/app/deployment/preview/PreviewCoordinator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b79fe3faa0780f8afa0a421cc1a4e9d33acd6ecb3668337ec5ed795e15ed4a05"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Scala\u0027s null is not held to the type system everywhere: No build over this repository\u0027s 144 Scala product file(s) passes \u0060-Yexplicit-nulls\u0060, enables WartRemover\u0027s \u0060Null\u0060 wart or runs Scalafix\u0027s \u0060DisableSyntax.noNulls\u0060, so every reference type admits null and nothing reports a \u0060null\u0060 written into the code or returned from a Java API \u2014 the first one to reach a method call is a \u0060NullPointerException\u0060. \u0060Option\u0060 by convention is a habit no tool here holds the code to."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23e7c3c6da50151f07723c64ca4f881fd5903e713d143161a7c0594ad7ba29cc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1333","guid":"11a336ce-63de-c45c-845e-29ca1e8df13d","name":"CWE-1333","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1333"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1333.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-319","guid":"7af97476-9f0d-4458-9163-3d2043918a1a","name":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information","shortDescription":{"text":"Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":30,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}