{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TouchAction.preventDefaults (cyclomatic 16): TouchAction.preventDefaults has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/touchactionjs/touchaction-constructor.js"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f66dbb0e7c42686264b7692e0011710f94d35a5cbf2c41bc5062474bb270e0ce"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::TouchAction::preventDefaults (cyclomatic 16): (anonymous)::TouchAction::preventDefaults has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1559}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b2bab3dcf99d0dbf842f0be4d4d3045847845eabe24a700ed9bf5e7254f990c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TapRecognizer.process (cognitive 19): TapRecognizer.process has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizers/tap.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ff9f77ea947bfd59a9c90362142e6445784862bbdf30e1f65a4be83364472d6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::TapRecognizer::process (cognitive 19): (anonymous)::TapRecognizer::process has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a88447d8331eed419f0249ac0f116692f00ec23af4ee0c60b6e2d3dd379e049a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::PanRecognizer::directionTest (cognitive 17): (anonymous)::PanRecognizer::directionTest has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 4 (12 pts), if/else 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1063}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d327c325e56fe7f5b062f17448e9248eb15511cce41eef6c2a4f31ff4402dfec"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"directionTest (cognitive 17): directionTest has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 4 (12 pts), if/else 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizers/pan.js"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b273bd5f24be86b639011b9439bfcbffd10173f5834675d9aa9fda5ef97a0319"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./hammer.js: FileTooLong \u2014 1475 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 975 over it, 2.95\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"013149188a01c8f6b7fad04cb97ba34bdbcbe991585b3764425104463bbdcc4a"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Recognizer (LCOM4 4): Recognizer\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizerjs/recognizer-constructor.js"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f9c508287482c36e7409f22e889453208af6966af1e98d8481aa4f3d22cec34"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83624e2a75b102d656da943ab10c203006d969612030d1669428c03d4067940e"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf7af840a9149b73568505250ee0d5dce0a3e537b00b614616ecf1e84d950fca"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further orphaned files (smaller): 11 smaller file(s) also have no living knowledge \u2014 folded into the freshness score and metrics rather than raised one row each \u2014 most significant first: src/manager.js, src/recognizerjs/recognizer-constructor.js, src/hammer.js, src/recognizers/tap.js, src/main.js, src/touchactionjs/touchaction-constructor.js, src/input/touchmouse.js, src/input/touch.js (and 3 more) (12 orphaned of 12 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 12 of the 66 production source files in this repository met that bar). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"D43","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca77df8ac0ed56a2e42b0923be81cca477f3174e98a1dc599981adac6a376eef"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README advertises a RAG / ML engine, but no ML/RAG code or dependency exists \u2014 searched for: \u0060rag\u0060, \u0060langchain\u0060, \u0060llamaindex\u0060, \u0060pinecone\u0060, \u0060weaviate\u0060, \u0060qdrant\u0060, \u0060embeddings\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CI pipeline targets a decommissioned service: The pipeline is well-formed, but the only CI definition is \u0060.travis.yml\u0060, and its \u0060README.md\u0060 build badge still points at \u0060travis-ci.org\u0060 \u2014 a service shut down in June 2021. No other CI is configured in this repository, so nothing has been building or testing changes here since that shutdown \u2014 the steps below describe a gate that is not running. Porting it is mostly mechanical: the build and test commands already written here are what a replacement pipeline would run."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94fa49939f4e75dfcbfaabad72be66184852fe80bd9db87538e6e15223919a47"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s javascript-typescript pack, \u0060semgrep --config=p/javascript\u0060, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 79 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 79 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are changelog.js, hammer.js, src/hammer.js, src/input/mouse.js, src/input/pointerevent.js, src/input/singletouch.js (\u002B73 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (167 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2530 \u00B7 src/manager.js:30 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 983 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2530}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d940015bb40b2a2213361fc5271d7f1873fa1cadb3f57682c6fba92716a47db"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (106 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:555 \u00B7 src/recognizerjs/recognizer-constructor.js:57 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 639 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":555}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90db5ac9a78325dc8ab3b2ed6fe4490e1359b68afb19badc10b84b103eb683d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2258 \u00B7 src/input/touch.js:79 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2258}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5642f90ca2f66084c895c191ea1138363f6ac1517e307430ca9e34f252fd5ee7"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (25 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2410 \u00B7 src/input/touchmouse.js:48 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 155 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2410}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a2cd7ec40dc67ddfcc95bd9d073cd09793481df6756af680570f28f4e4299b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (22 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2888 \u00B7 src/hammer.js:21 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 167 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2888}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af72364ed6f2a2a0ae73cf42922b3a9013fabab22f8037b4094426006b09885e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (22 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:127 \u00B7 src/utils/assign.js:9 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 125 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6ef7fd84cd52dabeff28b54f2a6e10ccf17034ffb847cf72e9df3177345546c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2335 \u00B7 src/input/mouse.js:40 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88e13d2bc856c8319a28878419dd09724099a9edb7b22fedfe20306a8ec7b50c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:171 \u00B7 src/utils/each.js:9 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71fef78e3a220aedf597897de24b1229b0534c715c72e3c85b3e9b55afa37ff7"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:923 \u00B7 hammer.js:959 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":923}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35e0959c0c0b5632a6fb29d9bc73a7398fc5d82c04cb40b0c69a1d042fe57c30"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2106 \u00B7 src/input/pointerevent.js:70 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6895985c4c1e911ad5b79d78e35c782c061ee1a1e188b48623bacaad35a8ef38"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (17 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1837 \u00B7 src/inputjs/compute-input-data.js:24 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 144 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1837}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"106629ff3650a770771c43ca180166ea21705966d17bb775c0c8251b22c462f1"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (17 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1454 \u00B7 src/touchactionjs/clean-touch-actions.js:16 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 82 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1454}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa627d9479a53c8e1247331579dbc4bf3f49b45c6b9f7b61f95ea88d378bdb9c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1250 \u00B7 hammer.js:1371 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"660cc940ba4747c6ebfb4cd661e74cb68d4b5286b4c9bbee5a2a023feb5907c6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2225 \u00B7 hammer.js:3065 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9db84a92848c79f122a4624ad75aa26f4f21a18b0a0c04dcb407223b68740369"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:898 \u00B7 src/recognizers/attribute.js:49 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea65e43b8b33e2cc8e1140a83466251f01b9391ce9889c6326d4a3eb4ad4b5a6"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1733 \u00B7 src/inputjs/compute-delta-xy.js:9 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1733}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c25d4a2e59b43c305a86e055577b27444c37c9475dc0714f34d61c06b4f0c9f8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1810 \u00B7 src/inputjs/compute-interval-input-data.js:27 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1810}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e1369136282c3e0b5e38334ace3833a3bb3f5d80644b2880f56014fadb9c15a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (14 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:218 \u00B7 src/utils/in-array.js:9 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 82 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37c4d1e4416433ac1e278e3874d0be7a1520e7c2e13995c80711fb8085756b3b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1982 \u00B7 src/inputjs/input-constructor.js:16 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1982}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54380cf68e95aa4efdf7853fa56472f3ad76dbbd0be7169bf688732c319f22ae"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2497 \u00B7 src/inputjs/create-input-instance.js:18 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2497}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"919087355fed414abbbe55a33dfb3b8caa2b574e03d3e997e9b86396f630d0de"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:35 \u00B7 src/utils/prefixed.js:9 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 74 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9d5c6898d8d03e069d9a02e18890b976aad31941b7a670ddd20d3904ee3c099"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/input/singletouch.js:54 \u00B7 src/input/touch.js:43 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/input/singletouch.js"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad629764463843c66cb7c682a5b5dc3b194da23083bac81810ca2729c788b357"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:501 \u00B7 src/recognizerjs/state-str.js:14 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":501}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfb5c7b43cceab85bbf765c6e7f67321de6f3ef3f5f1e56ea7c9b29f2f6a98bc"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1013 \u00B7 src/recognizerjs/direction-str.js:14 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1013}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c00aac88679f8074b38989de2a0aebca379bcce226ceff13e49b349ee1038b69"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1898 \u00B7 src/inputjs/input-handler.js:15 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04826626ee941b25e3b6d14ddf280b11dddbbfd6291062d9e67723eb5c7487a4"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:2166 \u00B7 src/utils/unique-array.js:17 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca2b0fb2ab555ec5a3df02262007e07480b604867b3b8b9ca4fb9589c910d71c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:3061 \u00B7 src/input/singletouch.js:50 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":3061}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef87b18b3c4f4984ae340bae0e79d8e6e4b119948583ed0e2e5e13b00638e1c1"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1650 \u00B7 src/inputjs/get-center.js:22 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1650}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"126088150fcf0880136262665300d82feb678df6982c5d9c513d5bfa2bb0aaf2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1673 \u00B7 src/inputjs/simple-clone-input-data.js:14 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1673}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65b286169a1add524a4ffd58b258ff11e3edcd7f19bb8daccdceaee4e0b541ba"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4 locations): hammer.js:849 \u00B7 hammer.js:924 \u00B7 hammer.js:960 \u00B7 hammer.js:1117 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":849}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80c2a5abb4f739666c9ed0d2c0ea36f7e701a0779a1123e299371374c7dcabb0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:3227 \u00B7 src/main.js:127 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 53 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":3227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de666741e5c06f488b7c9f7f4d4f28d666c463267117a68444e5d7f81aa7ae93"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:53 \u00B7 src/touchactionjs/get-touchaction-props.js:3 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 72 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2508f6560fceda31e5f8fd70718c410c34ca312df94d64422c82baeeb7b34271"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:3098 \u00B7 src/utils/deprecate.js:9 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 105 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":3098}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e947cdb7fc79c82a53cf1d446bfc6be3f1869b25167d4ed055a5a854f3c3e915"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:3122 \u00B7 src/utils/extend.js:12 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 71 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":3122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf35ee2959b044d94f8f03145a940f85021294d04d15c67e4731a1d51c477d3c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/recognizers/pinch.js:12 \u00B7 src/recognizers/rotate.js:12 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizers/pinch.js"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9752ddfe40be3168d41d3b783d2c9002148cba6439b78c6fd5a77fcb4dedf39"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/recognizers/press.js:26 \u00B7 src/recognizers/tap.js:34 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizers/press.js"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3d321f1f0ecea558402c536e4d5ff0b1790c120146b202fa0752dad767d23e8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1145 \u00B7 src/recognizers/swipe.js:26 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62c1dacd7199bb89fcbcf4a3ef7388ce513212a4e2ff0ab855276122ec52cd0b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1201 \u00B7 hammer.js:1688 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f28777f54a9c449aa76e209bc04ffbc932e9f013e3b72773a66c53d0bbbd997"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1284 \u00B7 src/recognizers/tap.js:62 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1284}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaddd8009c5f7f308abcb264d3cc4997e9fbce2aa4502ced7897970e1c13d75e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): hammer.js:1510 \u00B7 src/touchactionjs/touchaction-constructor.js:38 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1510}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed6945457096bd9e30b91e3cc7cafe3272864980869257d1e560af3ab0af556a"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function preventDefaults (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 15): preventDefaults has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1559}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1deae11e2541c4b10c629eaedf610acf3d013ce96be43bb4fc3f639154717e31"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function preventDefaults (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 15): preventDefaults has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/touchactionjs/touchaction-constructor.js"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"035e75570026e8b1a2a639b3f3ddf5dc6079d35694154e948051954ba618bf34"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function process (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 19): process has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70e43d84781897ed347b6d139a96be86f26be00af6d2998840fe586ce80c7caa"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function process (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 19): process has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/recognizers/tap.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"448ef5d7a3266bf848d162ac7542ed2614e81969c7f954b61f08840a6c55afdf"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function recognize (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 13): recognize has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":2602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b887064b87cfa9fa77501e5a54cc9056cc1fd65bbf3da828b667e3ceb1ab166"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function recognize (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 13): recognize has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/manager.js"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e21f1fcf43f8ebdd29f9dfa41f8391e743094a0174db95629da407cea3378512"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function computeInputData (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 11): computeInputData has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 11; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1834}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"680760eb551cf7da5d47450f03d42e31b5b5dfe7fc81a86d52fd6acc51ba2dac"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function computeInputData (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 11): computeInputData has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 11; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/inputjs/compute-input-data.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba87ae77d1d117db8b45fddacf15dd9251c1227c6263b73dc6fa2b0ce1fa7e43"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 12): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 12; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eecee08c07fe612b16bc8190a98173438f73f77b3cb16fcbbf9c609065e9f14c"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No lint or typecheck script: test \u2713 \u00B7 lint \u2717 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"658a995477a4f3b704a1d0c61d78cffb4c5cc1944c2f896c1bb70ee901a201cf"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~71 LoC): no import path from any entry point (18 application, 1 tooling, 15 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"changelog.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b458dd52a43117ff43899276e63a861c3837d560641c3db17b59e47d5d885bb1"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027jshint-stylish\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d74a066c92afc3c1a0abe14a79aba0d94a608a5c58ed5ee93b6f14441d8ae890"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027node-qunit-phantomjs\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"147572813f1a4b9659235f0638fd959fed060f7ab6af4b98ff5d89058fbf8fe8"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): src/hammer.js \u2192 src/manager.js \u2192 src/hammer.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/hammer.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1776c50d8ac1e3dd0d78219deca6a5b6e96461f01fc9558896b3a2d38c79a201"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): src/touchactionjs/get-touchaction-props.js \u2192 src/touchactionjs/touchaction-Consts.js \u2192 src/touchactionjs/get-touchaction-props.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/touchactionjs/get-touchaction-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02d188933322c9977f4ae54f6946c9a2bca2548a3e161b9da78873dffbddb5ed"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JavaScript dependencies are not locked: No package-lock.json / yarn.lock / pnpm-lock.yaml / bun.lock \u2014 JS installs aren\u0027t reproducible (SSDF PW.4.4). Commit your package manager\u0027s lockfile and install from it (\u0060npm ci\u0060, \u0060yarn --immutable\u0060, \u0060pnpm i --frozen-lockfile\u0060 or \u0060bun i --frozen-lockfile\u0060). Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40a08798dc9f9c819eaa9f7c084938e1cf2517a9281aed2c31563d6f7d5ba90d"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":3,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}