# Changelog

> **This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.**

## Score

- CAI 68 → 51 (-16.5)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.18 → rubric-2026.08.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

## Lenses

- Code Health 97 → 100 (+2.6)
- Architecture 100 → 94 (-5.9)
- Maturity 62 → 59 (-2.5)
- Readiness 58 → 25 (-32.6)
- Security 86 → 85 (-0.7)

## Resolved (14)

- Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- Critical CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- FormBuilder.build_association_attribute (cognitive 16) (lib/simple_form/form_builder.rb)
- Further orphaned files (smaller)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- High CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- High vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- Low CVE: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- Medium vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- Medium vulnerability: [GHSA redacted] (Gemfile.lock)
- The README does not mention the form builder or custom-form-builder configuration path (app/inputs/custom_inputs/numeric_input), which is critical for plugin authors who need to register their own input types. (README.md)
- TooManyMethods: FormBuilder (lib/simple_form/form_builder.rb)

## New (4)

- Coverage not measured — test suite did not build
- Dimension evaluation failed
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- No tests found
