Executive summary
helgeho/ArchiveSpark scores 41 out of 100 and is rated Weak, while three of its five lenses score higher still: Architecture and Security and Compliance at 100, both rated Exemplary, and Code Health at 75, rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those three because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 23 and is rated Critical. Its Test Distribution dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution and to resolve the 24 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 41 to about 53.
No finding in this survey is critical.
Watchdog couldn't measure 6 dimensions in this code, among them Dependency Hygiene, License Compliance and Internal API Consistency, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 3,501 lines, which would take an estimated 0.1 person-years, around €3,500, to rebuild.
If Production Readiness rose from 23 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 41 to about 53.
Rebuild cost: about €3,500 · Estimate
| Cost to rebuild | €1,200 to €5,900, for 19 to 62 hours of work, about 0.1 person-years for one engineer |
|---|---|
| Difficulty of the problem | Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write. |
| Quality factor | ×0.7 at a score of 41. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it. |
| Size | Small: 3,501 lines of product code |
Top priorities
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
| uses → | 1 webservices | 2 webservices.archivespark.ArchiveSpark | 3 webservices.archivespark.dataspecs | 4 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads | 5 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad | 6 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.TextLoad | 7 webservices.archivespark.specific | 8 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits | 9 webservices.archivespark.util | 10 webservices.archivespark.model.pointers | 11 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs | 12 webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes | 13 webservices.archivespark.functions | 14 webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access | 15 webservices.archivespark.model | 16 webservices.archivespark.implicits | 17 webservices.archivespark.specific.raw | 18 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc | 19 webservices.archivespark | 20 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 webservices | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 webservices.archivespark.ArchiveSpark | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 webservices.archivespark.dataspecs | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.TextLoad | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 webservices.archivespark.specific | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 webservices.archivespark.util | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 webservices.archivespark.model.pointers | 3 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 11 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs | 6 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
| 12 webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 13 webservices.archivespark.functions | 8 | 1 | 2 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
| 14 webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 15 webservices.archivespark.model | 1 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 16 webservices.archivespark.implicits | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 17 webservices.archivespark.specific.raw | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 18 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 19 webservices.archivespark | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 20 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions | 2 | 8 | 1 |
10→5 webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DependentFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.MultiFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Root
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad can break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
10→15 webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses webservices.archivespark.model part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 14 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DataLoadPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DependentFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DependentFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.MultiEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.MultiFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.MultiFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.MultiEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.MultiToSingleFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.PathFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.RelativeFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.SingleToMultiFieldPointer→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model.pointers uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
11→3 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses a type in webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.CdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.TextDataSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcCdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.TextDataSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxSpecBase→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.DataSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.DataSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackCdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.TextDataSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.DataSpec
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs, so a change to webservices.archivespark.dataspecs can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs can't break webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
11→9 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcCdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.FilePathMaporg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxRddSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.FilePathMap
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
11→18 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 7 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcCdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxRddSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxSpecBase→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackCdxHdfsSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WaybackRecordorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WaybackRecord
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, so a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs can't break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
12→9 webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 3 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes.BytesArray→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes.BytesEither→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes.BytesStream→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes, while a change to webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→5 webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad✕
- Connections
- 8 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.AbsoluteUrl→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.EntitiesNamespace→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlAttributeNamespace→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlNamespace→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlText→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.LowerCase→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.SURT→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.StringContent→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Root
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad can break webservices.archivespark.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→9 webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.StringContent→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Bytes
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→10 webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.StringContent→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Values→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can break webservices.archivespark.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
13→15 webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model part of a loop✕
- Connections
- 21 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.AbsoluteUrl→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Data→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Data→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Entities→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundMultiEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Entities→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Entities→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.EntitiesNamespace→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.EntitiesNamespace→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTag→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTag→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTag→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTags→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundMultiEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTags→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlTags→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.HtmlText→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.LowerCase→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.SURT→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.StringContent→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.StringContent→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Values→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Values→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichable
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
14→13 webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access uses webservices.archivespark.functions✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access uses a type in webservices.archivespark.functions.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access.CloseableDataAccessor→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Dataorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access.DataAccessor→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Data
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access uses webservices.archivespark.functions, so a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can break webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access, while a change to webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access can't break webservices.archivespark.functions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→4 webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.DataLoad
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads can break webservices.archivespark.model, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→5 webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad✕
- Connections
- 4 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundMultiEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Rootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Root
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad can break webservices.archivespark.model, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→9 webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 6 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRoot→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Jsonorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Enrichable→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Copyableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Enrichable→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.JsonConvertibleorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Enrichable→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.SerializedExceptionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.IdentityField→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Jsonorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.SingleValueEnrichable→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Json
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.model, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→10 webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers✕
- Connections
- 8 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BasicEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DependentFieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundMultiEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.DependentFieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.BoundMultiEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.MultiEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.MultiEnrichFunc→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.MultiFieldPointer
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can break webservices.archivespark.model, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model can't break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
15→13 webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.functions✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.model uses a type in webservices.archivespark.functions.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRoot→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.functions.Data
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.model uses webservices.archivespark.functions, so a change to webservices.archivespark.functions can break webservices.archivespark.model, while a change to webservices.archivespark.model can't break webservices.archivespark.functions.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.model uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→5 webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.EnrichableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Root
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad can break webservices.archivespark.implicits, while a change to webservices.archivespark.implicits can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→9 webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.EnrichableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.SerializedException
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.implicits, while a change to webservices.archivespark.implicits can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→10 webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.EnrichableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.SimplifiedGetterEnrichRoot→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can break webservices.archivespark.implicits, while a change to webservices.archivespark.implicits can't break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
16→15 webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.EnrichableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFunc
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.implicits uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.implicits, while a change to webservices.archivespark.implicits can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.implicits uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→3 webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses a type in webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.raw.HdfsFileSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.DataSpec
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs, so a change to webservices.archivespark.dataspecs can break webservices.archivespark.specific.raw, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.raw can't break webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
17→15 webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses webservices.archivespark.model✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.raw.FileStreamRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.raw.FileStreamRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.specific.raw, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.raw can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.raw uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→5 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcLikeRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.Root
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.model.dataloads.ByteLoad.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→8 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.ImplicitResolvableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits.CdxRDDorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.ImplicitWarcRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits.WarcRDD
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits, so a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.implicits.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→9 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.util✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.util.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.CdxBasedRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.util.Json
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.util, so a change to webservices.archivespark.util can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.util.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→11 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs✕
- Connections
- 7 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.CdxSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.CdxHdfsSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcCdxHdfsSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsCdxRddSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WarcHdfsSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackCdxHdfsSpecorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcSpec→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.WaybackSpec
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs, so a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.specs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→14 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access.DataAccessor
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access, so a change to webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.access.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
18→15 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.model✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.CdxBasedRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanionorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WaybackRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WaybackRecord→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichRootCompanion
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→3 webservices.archivespark uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark uses a type in webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.ArchiveSpark→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.DataSpec
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark uses webservices.archivespark.dataspecs, so a change to webservices.archivespark.dataspecs can break webservices.archivespark, while a change to webservices.archivespark can't break webservices.archivespark.dataspecs.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
19→16 webservices.archivespark uses webservices.archivespark.implicits✕
- Connections
- 5 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark uses a type in webservices.archivespark.implicits.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.ImplicitEnrichableRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.EnrichableRDDorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.ImplicitGenericHelpersRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.GenericHelpersRDDorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.ImplicitJsonConvertibleRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.JsonConvertibleRDDorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.ImplicitSimplifiedGetterEnrichRoot→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.SimplifiedGetterEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.ImplicitStringRDD→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.implicits.StringRDD
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark uses webservices.archivespark.implicits, so a change to webservices.archivespark.implicits can break webservices.archivespark, while a change to webservices.archivespark can't break webservices.archivespark.implicits.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→10 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers✕
- Connections
- 2 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.HttpPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointerorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.FieldPointer
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model.pointers, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model.pointers can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.model.pointers.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→15 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model✕
- Connections
- 8 pairs of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.model.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.HttpPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.HttpPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.HttpPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.HttpPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichableorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.DataEnrichRootorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.Derivativesorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.EnrichFuncorg.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.model.TypedEnrichable
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.model, so a change to webservices.archivespark.model can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.model.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
20→18 webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc✕
- Connections
- 1 pair of types, where a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a type in webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.
- The types involved
org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions.WarcPayload→org.archive.webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.WarcRecord
- Direction
- webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses webservices.archivespark.specific.warc, so a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc can break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions, while a change to webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions can't break webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.
- Position
- Below the diagonal: webservices.archivespark.specific.warc.functions uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health
At a glance — Architecture
At a glance — Maturity
At a glance — Readiness
At a glance — Security
Roadmap
First, resolve the missing test coverage in Test Distribution and eliminate the 24 orphaned files in Knowledge Freshness, prioritizing Enrichable.scala, WarcRDD.scala, and FieldPointer.scala. Next, update the documentation to accurately reflect the current codebase by removing references to non-existent files and establish a dedicated folder for architecture decision records to capture key design choices. Finally, implement a continuous integration workflow that automatically builds the project and runs the test suite on every push and pull request to ensure ongoing stability.
| Do this | Helps | Effort | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution. | +17.6 pts | Low | Test Distribution |
| Resolve the 24 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Enrichable.scala, WarcRDD.scala, FieldPointer.scala. | +12.5 pts | Medium | Knowledge Freshness |
| Reconcile the README with reality: docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala` does not exist. | +4.9 pts | Medium | Documentation accuracy |
| Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them. | +4.9 pts | Medium | Architecture documentation |
| Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR. | +4.4 pts | Medium | CI/CD gates |
| On Scala 3, add `-Yexplicit-nulls` to `scalacOptions` so `String` and `String | Null` mean different things, and type each Java API's result as nullable where it can return null; on Scala 2 (or as a first step), enable WartRemover's `Null` wart (`wartremoverErrors += Wart.Null`) or Scalafix's `DisableSyntax.noNulls = true` so the code holds absence in `Option`. Then pay the assertions down rather than adding to them: each `.nn` is a null the compiler could not rule out — wrap the Java value in `Option(…)` at the boundary, pattern-match on `null` once there, or change the API so the null cannot arrive; an `unsafeNulls` import switches the checking off for everything after it. | +3.4 pts | Medium | Nullable reference types |
| Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release. | +2.2 pts | Medium | Release Hygiene |
| Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs. | +1.3 pts | Medium | Documentation (README) |
File quality
| File | Score | Band | Worst signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/Enrichable.scala | 7.8 | Mixed | Cognitive Complexity: Enrichable.apply (cognitive 28) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/MultiValueEnrichable.scala | 7.8 | Mixed | Cognitive Complexity: MultiValueEnrichable.enrich (cognitive 23) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/BoundEnrichFunc.scala | 7.8 | Mixed | Code Duplication: Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/implicits/WarcRDD.scala | 8.5 | Near-clean | Cognitive Complexity: WarcRDD.saveAsWarc (cognitive 25) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/Values.scala | 8.5 | Near-clean | Cognitive Complexity: Values.derive (cognitive 17) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichRoot.scala | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) |
| src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichFunc.scala | 8.5 | Near-clean | Code Duplication: Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) |
How the grades work
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to carry for two years either.
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions. Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Something this survey could not settle from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 50 of 53 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
What we checked — 53 dimensions across the health lenses
- Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 52 of 61 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line.
- Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
- Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
Tools & methods
| Method | Backs | Version | Evaluator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roslyn static analysis | Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering | 5.3.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Native secret scanner | Hardcoded secrets / credentials | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Watchdog duplication detector (in-process) | Code duplication | 1.0.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage) | Line & branch coverage | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| NuGet / dotnet | Outdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies | 10.0.400 | ✓ deterministic |
| git / LibGit2Sharp | Churn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history | 2.43.0 · 0.31.0 | ✓ deterministic |
| gitleaks · semgrep · trivy | Secrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR | 1.86.0 · 0.69.3 | ✓ deterministic |
| LLM (sampled · advisory) | Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurement | Local LLM | ◐ LLM · sampled · advisory |
Run transparency — what happened this run
- D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The test suite couldn't be built/run in-image and no coverage report is committed, so line coverage was not measured — and it is EXCLUDED from the score rather than scored on a LoC-ratio proxy. No coverage collector was found in your CI either, so there is no existing report to hand us. You can widen what we reach: optional: add a coverage collector to your test run and commit (or publish) its Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov output anywhere in the repo, or make the suite runnable in-image, and real coverage will be measured.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository's dependency manifest (an sbt build (build.sbt)) was found, but this pass cannot parse it for hygiene, so no package was assessed. Zero packages read is NOT a clean dependency tree, so this is NOT SCORED — a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. This row is about dependency HYGIENE — outdated, deprecated or unmaintained direct dependencies; known CVEs in the same dependency graph are a separate question, reported under D30 wherever the manifest is OSV-readable.
- D14 License Compliance — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — this repository's 1 sbt build file(s) (build.sbt and project/*.scala) were read and none of the production library dependencies they declare carries a version this pass can resolve from the file itself. sbt is a program rather than a manifest: a val holding one string literal is read, but anything computed would need the build run, and this pass does not run it. Licences are resolved from the POMs Maven Central publishes, which requires an exact coordinate to ask about. NOT a finding that this repository's licences are compliant: this dimension asserts nothing about its licensing in either direction.
- D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (3 contributor(s) across 154 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 97% of the history; the other 2 hold 1.5% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is an ADMISSION gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (project/plugins.sbt), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here. D22 DOES collect the public API of every language in this tree, and admits a project only when its manifest makes that ecosystem's publication act in a form the marker recognises — so what is missing is not a collector but an admission rule for the publication act this repository makes, if it makes one. The remedy is a better discriminator for that marker — not a collector, and no change to the scan image can close it. The marker's rules are measured to refuse applications, so one refused repository is the rule working as calibrated; several are the evidence that it is too strict.
- D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
- C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
- C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
- P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
- D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
- D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
- D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
- D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
- D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
- D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
- D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
- D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
- D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
- D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
- D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
- D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
- D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
- D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
- D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
- D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
- D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
- AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
- M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
- P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
Dimensions
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity
0 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15.
D2 · Cognitive Complexity
5 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was Enrichable.apply at 28.
What to do
- Bring the 5 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with Enrichable.apply (cognitive 28), WarcRDD.saveAsWarc (cognitive 25), MultiValueEnrichable.enrich (cognitive 23). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 5 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 8.9 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Cognitive Complexity in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
D3 · God Classes
0 god class(es) detected.
D4 · Code Duplication
4 duplicated block group(s) detected. One further row reports members as variants of one another; it aggregates block groups already counted above and is not itself counted.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with BoundEnrichFunc.scala. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with MultiValueEnrichable.scala. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Resolve the 1 Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with EnrichRoot.scala. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
- Stand up a CI pipeline, then gate Code Duplication in it to reach Verified (currently Documented). — This repository has no CI pipeline, so there is nothing to add a gate to yet — the pipeline comes first. Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)
0 of 5 classes have LCOM4 above 3.
D9 · Test Distribution
No test suite found.
What to do
- Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D13 · Secret Scanning
Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.
D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots
No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.
D17 · Explicit Debt
0 deducted task-comment markers across 3501 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
D19 · Documentation Quality
ArchiveSpark's documentation is clear and complete for a framework/toolkit. The repository root README (README.md) gives an overview of what ArchiveSpark does, its new features in version 3.0, and links to the docs directory, while the docs/README.md documents that directory (the docs/ dir itself), not the repo, so it is kept separate. A focused architecture/design doc set (docs/Approach_Publications.md through docs/EnrichFuncs.md) explains the framework's core ideas, publications, and a complete DataSpecs reference plus how to implement enrichment functions. The README also links out to usage examples in docs/Recipes.md and provides installation instructions for ArchiveSpark with Jupyter via Docker and manual steps. The repository's documentation is clear and complete for its scope. The READMEs cover the project thoroughly: Operations.md explains what ArchiveSpark does (enriching datasets with FieldPointers), Dataset/Record/Field-value operations, a full table of contents, recipes/examples showing how to build corpora, analyze term distributions, extract hyperlinks/embedded resources, load WARC/CDX from Wayback, and download as WARC/CDX; Recipes.md also covers interoperability with related projects like ArchiveSpark2Triples, Web2Warc, and HadoopConcatGz. Using_Jupyter.md guides installing Jupyter, starting a notebook, importing the library, and executing Spark code, while Using_Library.md explains dependency via Maven Central, how to create a Spark Context manually for libraries, and where to find API docs (Operations, DataSpecs). The architecture/design documentation is separate and well-organized. All visible sections are present in the outline; no missing-overview, installation/usage/contribution guidance, or licence.
D21 · Naming Consistency
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
D26 · Project Cohesion
0 of 1 build units (sbt) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
D28 · Secrets (history)
gitleaks scanned the full history AND the current working tree and found no secrets.
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)
semgrep found no security issues.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness
24 of 24 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/Enrichable.scala. Counted over 24 of the 77 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
What to do
- Resolve the 24 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with Enrichable.scala, WarcRDD.scala, FieldPointer.scala. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (24 recommendation-level).
- Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
D35 · Change Coupling
No strong hidden change-coupling between production files.
D44 · Platform End-of-Life
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
AX10 · Code composition
What to do
- The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
AX3 · Project dependency cycles
AX4 · Dependency direction
AX6 · Interface segregation
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs
M1 · Documentation (README)
What to do
- Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
- Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
- Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
M2 · Architecture documentation
- No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
- No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
- Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
- Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
M3 · Folder & project structure
- Tests aren't grouped in a dedicated test folder — the test surface isn't separable from production code at a glance.
What to do
- Group tests in the folder your build system expects (tests/, test/, spec/, or your module's test source set) so the test surface is discoverable and CI can scope it.
M4 · Documentation accuracy
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:15
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:19
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:21
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:26
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:30
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackCdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackCdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:34
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/raw/HdfsFileSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/raw/HdfsFileSpec.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:43
- docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/raw/FileStreamRecord.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/raw/FileStreamRecord.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/DataSpecs.md:43
- docs/EnrichFuncs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/HtmlText.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/HtmlText.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/EnrichFuncs.md:21
- docs/EnrichFuncs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/HtmlAttribute.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/HtmlAttribute.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/EnrichFuncs.md:23
- docs/EnrichFuncs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/LowerCase.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/LowerCase.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/EnrichFuncs.md:25
- docs/EnrichFuncs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/Entities.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/Entities.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/EnrichFuncs.md:29
- docs/EnrichFuncs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/Values.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/functions/Values.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/EnrichFuncs.md:31
- docs/General_Usage.md links to `Install_Juyter.md`, but `docs/Install_Juyter.md` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/General_Usage.md:14
- docs/Installing_Jupyter.md documents the environment variable `HADOOP_CONF_DIR`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/Installing_Jupyter.md:60
- docs/Installing_Jupyter.md documents the environment variable `SPARK_OPTS`, but no code, script or configuration file names it. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/Installing_Jupyter.md:63
- docs/Operations.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcFileMeta.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcFileMeta.scala` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/Operations.md:45
- docs/Using_Jupyter.md links to `Install_Juyter.md`, but `docs/Install_Juyter.md` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/Using_Jupyter.md:30
What to do
- Reconcile the README with reality: docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/CdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcCdxHdfsSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WarcHdfsCdxPathRddSpec.scala` does not exist; docs/DataSpecs.md links to `../src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala`, but `src/main/scala/org/archive/archivespark/specific/warc/specs/WaybackSpec.scala` does not exist.
P1 · CI/CD gates
- No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, …) — changes aren't gated by an automated build/test.
What to do
- Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
P10 · Library API & versioning
P3 · Security & performance tooling
- No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add scalafix or scapegoat (or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language) — this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
- Run what this repository's stack ships: scalafix or scapegoat — or `semgrep --config=auto`, which runs on any language — locally for now, since there is no CI pipeline here yet, and as a step of the first workflow you add so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
- Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
P6 · Release Hygiene
- No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
- Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
X1 · Async correctness
X12 · Unreachable branch
X13 · Undrained process stream
X14 · Bypassable address classification
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader
X16 · Unfloored truncation loop
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness
X19 · Unrestored process-global state
X20 · Mistyped argument guard
X21 · Side-effecting pattern guard
X22 · Contradicted release guard
X23 · Unguarded diagnostic materialisation
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped
X25 · Inert configuration knob
X26 · Unsynchronised callback handoff
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element
X3 · Exception handling
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects
X5 · Nullable reference types
- No build over this repository's 75 Scala product file(s) passes `-Yexplicit-nulls`, enables WartRemover's `Null` wart or runs Scalafix's `DisableSyntax.noNulls`, so every reference type admits null and nothing reports a `null` written into the code or returned from a Java API — the first one to reach a method call is a `NullPointerException`. `Option` by convention is a habit no tool here holds the code to.
What to do
- On Scala 3, add `-Yexplicit-nulls` to `scalacOptions` so `String` and `String | Null` mean different things, and type each Java API's result as nullable where it can return null; on Scala 2 (or as a first step), enable WartRemover's `Null` wart (`wartremoverErrors += Wart.Null`) or Scalafix's `DisableSyntax.noNulls = true` so the code holds absence in `Option`. Then pay the assertions down rather than adding to them: each `.nn` is a null the compiler could not rule out — wrap the Java value in `Option(…)` at the boundary, pattern-match on `null` once there, or change the API so the null cannot arrive; an `unsafeNulls` import switches the checking off for everything after it.
Reference — by lens
| Lens | Score | Rating | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Health | 75% | Adequate — gated by X5 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Architecture | 100% | Exemplary | Solid. |
| Maturity | 26% | Weak — gated by D34, M2, M4 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Readiness | 23% | Critical — gated by D9, P1, P3 | Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens. |
| Security | 100% | Exemplary | Strongest area. |
Not evidenced — 2 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
- P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
- P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 64 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
- AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
- AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's Scala imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
- AX2 Stateful singletons — No container singleton was found, so there is no shared instance for concurrent requests to race on. No class in this Scala code is a Play controller, a Cask routes object, a Scalatra servlet, a Finatra controller, an Akka/Pekko HTTP routes holder or a JSR-330/Spring singleton, so no instance is shared between request threads.
- AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
- AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
- AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
- AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
- AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — This repository has nothing the runtime tiers could boot or serve — no markup, no UI framework or web-server dependency, no UI component source, no native UI project and no API definition — nothing here is a surface to boot — so runtime a11y/egress/header evidence has no subject here. Not applicable: this is neither a gap in the scan nor a finding about your code.
- C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
- C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named column (email, first_name, date_of_birth, phone_number, …) or stored credential on a Slick table or in a SQL migration's CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database client (Slick, Doobie, Quill, ScalikeJDBC, Anorm, Skunk, a MongoDB or Cassandra driver, JDBC) imported either, so this repository keeps no sensitive data whose changes an audit trail would record. If it does (through a store configured outside this repository, for instance), the trail belongs to wherever that data is stored.
- C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Slick table or in a SQL migration's CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Slick, Doobie, Quill, ScalikeJDBC, Anorm, Skunk, JDBC, MongoDB, Cassandra, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data whose lifetime a retention limit would bound.
- C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Slick table or in a SQL migration's CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE — and no database or data-store client (Slick, Doobie, Quill, ScalikeJDBC, Anorm, Skunk, JDBC, MongoDB, Cassandra, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data for a data subject to erase, export or consent over.
- D10 Test Quality — ~627 lines of test code exist on disk but weren't loaded from the analyzed solution (excluded from the .sln, or co-located/using a test attribute not loaded here), so test quality couldn't be assessed. Include the tests in the analyzed solution to enable this check.
- D11 Test Reliability — No test suite was found to re-run, so reliability couldn't be assessed. Two searches produced that zero and both came back empty: the classifier that reads the loaded workspace recognised no suite it could run, and a walk of the source on disk — which covers the JS/TS `*.test.*` and `*.spec.*` conventions and probes for a Pester suite — found no test source in any other ecosystem either. Neither search reaches a suite that is missing from the loaded workspace and carries no name either walk recognises, so this is 'no suite found by those two searches', not a verdict that the repository has none.
- D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- D14 License Compliance — sbt licences not graded — no production declaration in build.sbt carries a literal version
- D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
- D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
- D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
- D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
- D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
- D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
- D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.scala), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
- D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (an sbt build (build.sbt) — not scanned yet).
- D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
- D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
- D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for.
- D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
- D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
- D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
- D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (an sbt build (build.sbt) — not scanned yet).
- D5 Coupling — Not applicable — this sbt build ships 1 production module(s), so there is no coupling BETWEEN modules to measure. (Its test and non-production modules are not part of the shipped graph.)
- D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
- D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured
- DM1 Domain Modelling — applicable but not scored (1 of 2 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): 1 value object(s)
- ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
- ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
- P12 CI test-gate honesty — no CI workflow found
- P2 Observability — This repository's JVM source (1 module(s), 74 file(s) read) declares no entry point and bootstraps no server, and nothing here deploys a service — it is a library, run inside whatever hosts it, so production observability (structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks) is N/A. If it grows a binary or a service, the dimension reactivates.
- P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JVM source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
- P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
- P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (`addSbtPlugin("org.scoverage" % "sbt-scoverage" % "<version>")` in `project/plugins.sbt`, then `sbt clean coverage test coverageReport`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
- PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for `@Benchmark` in a Java, Kotlin or Scala file importing JMH or kotlinx-benchmark, Jetpack Benchmark's `measureRepeated` in a file importing androidx.benchmark, or JMH/kotlinx-benchmark/androidx.benchmark in a pom.xml, Gradle or sbt build, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
- PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Scala code has 3,982 production line(s), 0 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
- PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Not applicable: this repository declares no async functions, so there is no asynchronous code for a blocking call to stall.
- S1 Web-Security Posture — No web surface: 74 Scala file(s) were read for weak hashes and ciphers, key material fixed in the source, disabled TLS certificate validation and obsolete TLS versions, and none was found. This repository serves no HTTP of its own — no HTTP-server artifact (akka-http, pekko-http, http4s, Play, Finagle, zio-http, cask, Scalatra, a tapir server, Jetty, Undertow, …) outside test scope in its build, and no server package imported or server bound in its production source — so HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, cookie flags and input validation are N/A here, as they are for a C# library or worker. If this codebase starts serving HTTP, the dimension reactivates automatically.
- X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Scala was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller — a Scala request takes no token: a Future cannot be cancelled, and cats-effect, ZIO and Monix interrupt the fiber that made the request from outside the call, not through a parameter
- X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
- X4 Structured logging — This check asks whether log calls keep a message's values apart from its text, which needs a logger that can carry them as fields. This repository's Scala was read, and it logs through none that an interpolated message defeats: scala-logging takes an `s"…"` message apart into SLF4J's pattern and arguments at compile time, and log4s, grizzled-slf4j, Play's Logger, Akka's LoggingAdapter, sbt's Logger and Spark's Logging take one finished message (as log4net does in C#). Calls made straight through SLF4J (`org.slf4j.Logger`) would be judged.
- X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
- X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
Serious — 11 finding(s)
- Enrichable.apply (cognitive 28) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/Enrichable.scala:159
- WarcRDD.saveAsWarc (cognitive 25) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/implicits/WarcRDD.scala:49
- MultiValueEnrichable.enrich (cognitive 23) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/MultiValueEnrichable.scala:47
- Enrichable.enrich (cognitive 18) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/Enrichable.scala:104
- Values.derive (cognitive 17) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/Values.scala:36
- Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/BoundEnrichFunc.scala:32
- Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/MultiValueEnrichable.scala:102
- Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichRoot.scala:55
- Duplicated block (5 lines × 4) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/BoundEnrichFunc.scala:41
- Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichFunc.scala:68
- No CI pipeline
Minor — 50 finding(s)
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/Enrichable.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/implicits/WarcRDD.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/pointers/FieldPointer.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/MultiValueEnrichable.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichFunc.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/ArchiveSpark.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/BoundMultiEnrichFunc.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/BoundEnrichFunc.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/Entities.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/implicits/EnrichableRDD.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/Values.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/WaybackRecord.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/util/Bytes.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/Html.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/util/JupyterHelpers.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/functions/StringContent.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/functions/WarcPayload.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/MultiEnrichFunc.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/WarcRecord.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/util/Json.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/model/EnrichRoot.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/specific/warc/functions/HttpPayload.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/util/HttpHeader.scala:1
- Orphaned file src/main/scala/org/archive/webservices/archivespark/package.scala:1
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:15
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:19
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:21
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:26
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:30
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:34
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:43
- README/code drift docs/DataSpecs.md:43
- README/code drift docs/EnrichFuncs.md:21
- README/code drift docs/EnrichFuncs.md:23
- README/code drift docs/EnrichFuncs.md:25
- README/code drift docs/EnrichFuncs.md:29
- README/code drift docs/EnrichFuncs.md:31
- README/code drift docs/General_Usage.md:14
- README/code drift docs/Installing_Jupyter.md:60
- README/code drift docs/Installing_Jupyter.md:63
- README/code drift docs/Operations.md:45
- README/code drift docs/Using_Jupyter.md:30
- Dormant codebase
- No tests found
- No ADRs
- No architecture diagram/doc
- No tests/ separation
- No SAST
- No changelog
- Scala's null is not held to the type system everywhere
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
| Dimension | Tool | Version | Command | Findings | Raw output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-0fcf9697aeb24b8696e3fb85993eca8e/history.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json |
| D28 · Secrets (history) | gitleaks | — | gitleaks detect --no-git --no-banner --config /opt/gitleaks-rules/watchdog-gitleaks.toml --report-format json --report-path /tmp/watchdog-gitleaks-0fcf9697aeb24b8696e3fb85993eca8e/tree.json --exit-code 0 --source . | 0 | artifacts/raw/gitleaks-tree.json |
| D29 · Static Analysis (SAST) | semgrep | — | semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/watchdog-sast.yml --json --quiet --timeout 10 --timeout-threshold 3 --metrics off . | 0 | artifacts/raw/semgrep.json |
| D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (an sbt build (build.sbt) — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |
| D31 · IaC & Container Security | trivy | — | trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan. | 0 | — |
| D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) | semgrep | — | semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. | 0 | — |
| D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signing | provenance | — | provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/.forgejo/.gitea workflows, .circleci, .buildkite, .woodpecker, .teamcity, .gitlab-ci.yml, .travis.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml, .drone.yml, .cirrus.yml, .woodpecker.yml, appveyor.yml, azure-pipelines*.yml, .pipelines/, .vsts-ci/, .azuredevops/, Jenkinsfile); there is no build to attest provenance for. | 0 | — |
| D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policy | disclosure | — | disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed. | 0 | — |
| D40 · Network Egress Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D41 · Kernel & Syscall Confinement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D42 · Runtime Threat Enforcement | runtime-hardening | — | runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here. | 0 | — |
| D43 · Malicious Dependencies | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here) | — | none (dependency manifest found, not scanned for vulnerabilities here): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (an sbt build (build.sbt) — not scanned yet). | 0 | — |