{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypes.propTypesInstructions (cyclomatic 248): propTypes.propTypesInstructions has cyclomatic complexity 248 (threshold 15). Of this number, 206 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 42 belong to 18 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84dcda690dab7b0cd837ade93213b7e3db86f21efb63a28ba158e5c8bc81d9e0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Components.componentRule (cyclomatic 198): Components.componentRule has cyclomatic complexity 198 (threshold 15). Of this number, 172 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 26 belong to 6 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":287}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed70c5e46d40218af935e01502782eb79e793f3380df52ea40519bc34f1617a2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 118): create has cyclomatic complexity 118 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 118 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 34 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, isStateParameterReference, AssignmentExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5feb1caeef6fd6f9bab9052ce97e0425c17e5a9e3613efb7f555d4433cc5571a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 90): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 90 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 90 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 30 function items inside it that branch (getComponentTypeAnnotation, findAllTypeAnnotations, getPropKey, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/boolean-prop-naming.js"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d682b5de8d651b5ced518facd582f83e2a1ea4e29001a5ca9b321303c85ec729"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 81): create has cyclomatic complexity 81 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 81 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 18 function items inside it that branch (checkProperties::(anonymous), checkNode, ImportDeclaration, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"125ec5c51a124622bef014e1e461302db4fb635bc3cab1dce0ae3f335a71ff51"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypes.usedPropTypesInstructions (cyclomatic 77): usedPropTypes.usedPropTypesInstructions has cyclomatic complexity 77 (threshold 15). Of this number, 72 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":305}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"630e6d1ccad99a473b4b1af2c2910a1767e05b1dd68e66b535ff5c39817b7f8d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::getStatelessComponent (cyclomatic 69): componentRule::getStatelessComponent has cyclomatic complexity 69 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":479}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da92e6adacb52d35e7c5c6c3743c0fadf335428da76daffd38ea08fe106f932a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 66): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 66 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 66 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 23 function items inside it that branch (checkValidProp, MemberExpression, ImportDeclaration, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-typos.js"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c04a6f7fdbc43ca5333f8dbd132ac52a0b1a1a7df0d71d97ad045b89fe08d8d2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 61): create has cyclomatic complexity 61 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 12 of the 61 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement, Program, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ad99750a880f56dacc0ea593d2ce33967c4140706fa801cb07edf93c8ebb900"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 57): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 57 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (getRefPropIndexes::(anonymous), checkPropsOrder::(anonymous), comparePropsOrder, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-comp.js"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa0a2d2cfae09f25be48b24c39f27e2307069e618f2fe52c1e91cb866e04a342"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 57): create has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 57 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 22 function items inside it that branch (checkArrowFunctionWithJSX, checkIteratorElement, getReturnStatements, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-key.js"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bff6d4810c907d4c9e2dbce69c8cadba7a13ad5af10ea0355815fb94f34b168e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 48): create has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 48 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (MemberExpression, Identifier, ObjectPattern::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-access-state-in-setstate.js"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"701375386e9efd573e694d0bd7be851013d2be46ff22429d4c2198202ab40f9a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 46): create has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 46 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 20 function items inside it that branch (check, check::(anonymous), VariableDeclarator, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-wrap-multilines.js"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d9d2ee126f0af9f6f725e48ff0075a81749fda8863253f1ac0737d81bcc1ef6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-sort-props.contextCompare (cyclomatic 43): jsx-sort-props.contextCompare has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d34f044e8ef656208cc01003b16aeea98a88117910c3cda36424d6376ca5af27"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsDeclared (cyclomatic 43): propTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsDeclared has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eaf1d29facb6320ffa9bd77cf6c1f8d986abf5ab37beaad89688856ff00b86e2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 43): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 43 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 17 function items inside it that branch (hasPureRenderDecorator, hasCustomDecorator, isPureRenderDeclared, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/require-optimization.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18a24f5e741a568306b80b43579b9c0384885af71bd3c21235512f9d8ffcc526"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"defaultProps.defaultPropsInstructions (cyclomatic 42): defaultProps.defaultPropsInstructions has cyclomatic complexity 42 (threshold 15). Of this number, 35 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/defaultProps.js"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"701dd39c98e80ac8d7b882526e9c2fd261d900da5f29dd79ada0861634102112"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 41): create has cyclomatic complexity 41 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 41 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement:exit::fix, JSXOpeningElement:exit, hasCorrectLocation, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-closing-bracket-location.js"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7afef4c65e7e847cb151eae9fdb1f9a706588fee8ad3219ce3b5936d7d04c483"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsUsed (cyclomatic 38): usedPropTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsUsed has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e3f36e1667d588040e18a805c1fb9ad59906315e36e8aea43f36c7527fadfa2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 37): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 37 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (internalIsDeclaredInComponent, checkNestedComponent, isDeclaredInComponent, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35fe06c51e62070a6698784124e67c12cbf01c5a84351d65f2ed542ccd2b6643"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 37): create has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 37 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, findObjectProp::(anonymous), JSXElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-danger-with-children.js"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"454902a95ca29afaf19eb8537e23c339a44cdfa8220025d8480d9ba06d391862"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::isReactHookCall (cyclomatic 36): componentRule::isReactHookCall has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":765}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56f1b532d7c3cdcd0930e6bf22e6cf35152e2680cc775574422b4498c01e5f4b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 36): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 36 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (reportUnusedProperties, MemberExpression, VariableDeclarator, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-class-component-methods.js"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afec8339913bb733db6df2fff4b7a3c9f479d3904ee9a346da26ddb1e7ddbad2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 34): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 34 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (reportPropTypesWithoutDefault::(anonymous), reportFunctionComponent, reportFunctionComponent::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/require-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fb49b6a8798b9d68ae7bfdc6a0bbd84d351c3121e1bb0a5fb75e073060d0773"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 34): create has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 34 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (canFix, checkNode, isFragmentWithSingleExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-useless-fragment.js"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08760196bfa0963ed48724fc80e719983b555114570efcaa0cbee82ff76daf6b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 34): create has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 34 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (refersToReactFragment, Program:exit::(anonymous), ImportDeclaration::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-fragments.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71c3274f147bf318047bc8e52e85be2d85582925d45d560b11581a4f3de9c09f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 33): create has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 33 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (MemberExpression, isAllowedAssignment, findParentClassProperty, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-foreign-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5220c920e020d31e7865f5bff6d7281cac92bdeb15a1619cbdb04905c1d3a584"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 31): create has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 31 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, JSXAttribute, checkIdentifiers, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/style-prop-object.js"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0b0a1de4e555f8eb9a3376d808a5ef73a39394251640502cbbeef1cf8380975"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-constructed-context-values.isConstruction (cyclomatic 30): jsx-no-constructed-context-values.isConstruction has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.js"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff173ebcfbb0e26cfe135b209c79ff434acbf9b74f41a068e0ea9a11db8ded7e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 30): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 30 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (MemberExpression, ClassProperty, PropertyDefinition, Identifier, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prefer-exact-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7096c50e8f5a44f628ddb5db081138e3bbdb35d5266dcb155ed27d5d240670ac"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::CallExpression (cyclomatic 30): (anonymous)::CallExpression has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/hook-use-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6072d9bf7ef9eefab5cee844890dd8ae3dd176e3956812dbd6ac3286e9bbb237"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared (cyclomatic 29): propTypesInstructions::markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":1043}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"754d695fbcd0ec3d47b76d9c38e7cd77553a84b01f18db7d89f65f0d207ab0d5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXOpeningElement (cyclomatic 29): create::JSXOpeningElement has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"756f829aa96f279756791a671366757b359b515dc0a4dc923ddf11cd53301167"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 28): create has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (JSXAttribute, (anonymous), isForbidden, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-component-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80d3ca92b7aeaa4237efa2ac4b686e2c6a57570a07d2a94e6ac46c0b73da16d9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 27): create has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (getPropertyName, checkNode, findVariableByName, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6425ffaf331be13d45788078003ffc127962072f9831deb5fb2249d8fdee428e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::hasTranspilerName (cyclomatic 27): (anonymous)::hasTranspilerName has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/display-name.js"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13edde530fff90f67ad6ca5b7a4416a589121394fffcaf9cd6c2d0df98cdeced"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::VariableDeclarator (cyclomatic 27): (anonymous)::VariableDeclarator has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1ce6976f50f50baab21e685b5e94a3a82ad6e6db5edac5adaf8f950b6b0c5ea"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 26): create has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 9 function items inside it that branch (getPropertyName, checkNode, findVariableByName, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27829c14c70fe6bebb103a2133b64de21bbf5d45d004c8361d008bfd8f28a54a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 26): create has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (findJSXElementOrFragment::find, getDepth, findJSXElementOrFragment, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-max-depth.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ceec8370071b3c3e99eec21c79bb541bff781f1cf9e9cb89bc74d3c57bd306a"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::buildReactDeclarationTypes (cyclomatic 25): propTypesInstructions::buildReactDeclarationTypes has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":403}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47f83216282c6c8ea6e5ad67d84309e1f8edb7bef77b8e160879b0bc3a148d02"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 25): create has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (checkNodesIndent::(anonymous), getNodeIndent, JSXOpeningElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-indent-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fcaff0a7bf41802927101430aa49d35f8d4a6f600bccb59978287cfe78306be"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::validateBraceSpacing (cyclomatic 25): create::validateBraceSpacing has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"169fee802e8f849ee5297ed1dce20704742ce1f73243203c74fa2f97aa0afd89"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 24): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 24 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (getFixer, validate, VariableDeclaration, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/function-component-definition.js"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d183023596904059e570ee2e1479394a35a362e65456486f4987fa073e8bf60"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.searchDeclarationByName (cyclomatic 23): DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.searchDeclarationByName has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Of this number, 18 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":640}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59882d1a53720bb8dbd55ae6c1e1ffa810bce95be4c1ec82feeeaf9f5e540fb6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 23): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (reportUnusedPropType::(anonymous), isPropUsed, reportUnusedPropType, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e28990dc4fb401def1df93b522945d572c9bb3abc14ca4bd752abe1d7eb421cc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 23): create has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, JSXAttribute, JSXElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-children-prop.js"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4772e4e0fe799431aaffe723d9d41da6b9fba8828096723354b60ae38f8e68f2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.isDestructuredFromPragmaImport (cyclomatic 22): isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.isDestructuredFromPragmaImport has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.js"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3891c45db2283b3eebadcbc8859a9b6dbf6a1f4eb44fc32ee907baa19d772d66"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-leaked-render.ruleFixer (cyclomatic 22): jsx-no-leaked-render.ruleFixer has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 6 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-leaked-render.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"325961e2e821060a5a0f13da79b874ccf86dec1ac0517866f9e23e3b0517ccf6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 22): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (reportNodeIncorrectlyPositioned, MemberExpression, isContextInClass, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/static-property-placement.js"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca2d5a5071ff43a55f589ac1982b9b1916be4521efd37ed5b264f2579113e714"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cyclomatic 22): create::JSXAttribute has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-handler-names.js"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7933441c91eb17e95f14ceba7ba8605202af92c3e234e12a3b77e2ca43a17945"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 22): create has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 22 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, checkExpression, JSXElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/button-has-type.js"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edb2be7e9bd8433868b1f4e3128a2a790fcc2df4aa876b77cc2b15960f5bbbe1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.convertReturnTypeToPropTypes (cyclomatic 21): DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.convertReturnTypeToPropTypes has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 788, 799, 778). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":764}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38e39d48d77e92540a471bb7a6f722fb64dd8b0e3047206b66d8c8066cbc4e4c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 21): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle::(anonymous), reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle::(anonymous)::fix, reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-arrow-function-lifecycle.js"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2a786f2d12dafbd1fbab732343e1a6ecc674e3b5ed1ddaa2c48a14e0b193c5f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 21): create has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (JSXExpressionContainer \u003E LogicalExpression[operator=\u0022\u0026\u0026\u0022], JSXExpressionContainer \u003E ConditionalExpression, (anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-leaked-render.js"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c2fe97d612a417c2a1830d53df31ec9083ca178f94b03a389a003e52c6094f1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 21): create has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (Program:exit::(anonymous)::(anonymous), isNonBlockComment, isBlockCommentInCurlyBraces, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-newline.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4aad1ce84c1f8ef839bc2ee65d207c936a0ed4dd1013118e0addb4c7ea404909"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::lintUnnecessaryCurly (cyclomatic 21): create::lintUnnecessaryCurly has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a478e97bc4cf82b96d2c0c0eeb5cf90fe0bfe6778beda3048d42e129134d0c4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-sort-props.getGroupsOfSortableAttributes (cyclomatic 20): jsx-sort-props.getGroupsOfSortableAttributes has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebcaa986a6fa548684852dcc0be86dc397e12f47551f590ee7fb9d67daaf4add"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 20): create has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, CallExpression::(anonymous), JSXElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/void-dom-elements-no-children.js"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c75288fdf015c1e3da0dd6ddbf90ff85190cefcdabbf2c88cbb1864c58a7eee"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleFunctionComponent (cyclomatic 20): create::handleFunctionComponent has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"944aeb230fabfee97025619d0945526e1b14e475c3040322e45ce351481f5813"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::validate (cyclomatic 20): (anonymous)::validate has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unstable-nested-components.js"},"region":{"startLine":413}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ba6a6424990b6117cc1c65e180c7e56707cda5eb2750000ffcab815db3b4def"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 20): create has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (containsStringExpressionContainer, isRefsUsage, JSXAttribute, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-string-refs.js"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"259a15eac985e52470ec8b090560241cb457820991da03e1fcdfd687af5642cd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cyclomatic 20): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (AssignmentExpression, UpdateExpression, getOuterMemberExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-direct-mutation-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cfdcd2c0e29a2b17c9a47fba3a850e273043abdc8830cf97cddf65b1920be20"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 20): create has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function item inside it that branches (JSXOpeningElement). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-pascal-case.js"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1778e727193e6958fb1be25d5c53309188ca67c257a42613622882222322aee1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx.isReturningJSX (cyclomatic 19): jsx.isReturningJSX has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 19 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 96, 133). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/jsx.js"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9394a3b99b2a2c8f81e89145717b852c11ea8b8a049514b931f5a02dc6e17b50"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::getRelatedComponent (cyclomatic 19): componentRule::getRelatedComponent has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":655}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae4299b0678d782657114f9a09c8f38d859ab5e39a9cdd829eceda430666233c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXSpreadAttribute (cyclomatic 19): create::JSXSpreadAttribute has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-props-no-spreading.js"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac0ea95fa150bcdb075c84cc2cfebeaccdaf5007bd7b6722d1be202382ac1bb7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 19): create has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (checkIdentifierInJSX, JSXOpeningElement). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-undef.js"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfc70a37409fc0f002e2e0f67eaeecd0e8f71471007b3d0031abea7032340309"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cyclomatic 19): create::JSXAttribute has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js"},"region":{"startLine":486}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"150c2b2078c8e0d7ad617d1d99fd35467bed3b21814312fa67a6614ac4fb355c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleOpeningElement (cyclomatic 19): create::handleOpeningElement has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). This file\u0027s own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes \u2014 or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-indent.js"},"region":{"startLine":342}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af55c093336392b980f5dc2311c3ace3f4cadd418156f49ab288c060cd2b4ef2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 19): create has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 19 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (handleJSX::(anonymous), elementName, isInlineElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-child-element-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50e22dfaae626b177cf9bbae8ad28bd2a9c26266cc668260d81cc4567a362825"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 19): create has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (JSXAttribute, (anonymous)). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-dom-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8db9519eac3f4e507681a83626d9b2313ca2159e41453640d5892158f156c245"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"makeNoMethodSetStateRule.makeNoMethodSetStateRule (cyclomatic 18): makeNoMethodSetStateRule.makeNoMethodSetStateRule has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 10 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 8 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/makeNoMethodSetStateRule.js"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f913d16ad82050bbe6a1a45bad2ab7f8eed9d5c60607bd01c1b4a35e759b10a4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"no-unstable-nested-components.isComponentInRenderProp (cyclomatic 18): no-unstable-nested-components.isComponentInRenderProp has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unstable-nested-components.js"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6138283f18c1d986aba767ddf471f198d365aced3e0f2cecade7a7feb9c0c481"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypesInstructions::VariableDeclarator (cyclomatic 18): usedPropTypesInstructions::VariableDeclarator has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":480}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a36ec360558153f78638afdd9ea9bb29f33adfdb6bb78224a7c8fa025d77793"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::searchDeclarationByName (cyclomatic 18): propTypesInstructions::searchDeclarationByName has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":640}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b0a1fa4c331688dfede027e46223daa93c806c9733d0f3d0098dc91ed805309"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"isReturningJSX::isJSXValue (cyclomatic 18): isReturningJSX::isJSXValue has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/jsx.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd9065834eb1a0e680041bf6927ca4b62df30cba51f8042b9c8d9ed19d81453b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cyclomatic 18): create::JSXAttribute has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unknown-property.js"},"region":{"startLine":579}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ed6f348dec49100e47a4fe5068f61c686944817f54103c146432ef160647ccc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 18): create has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement, JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous)::fix, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-first-prop-new-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a628047f1561e9daf543f45cdb30b5fa37c435460e2310897b20d9119182d9eb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"isCreateContext.isCreateContext (cyclomatic 17): isCreateContext.isCreateContext has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/isCreateContext.js"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"382692607be6bf55f2ef70c38bf657698156e951706c53bd01961fb69d52cda6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::VariableDeclarator (cyclomatic 17): create::VariableDeclarator has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-deprecated.js"},"region":{"startLine":236}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8ebbad1c730763c250770328d49ff075cc9850a3c59c8e33206a10713d0777f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleJSX (cyclomatic 17): create::handleJSX has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-one-expression-per-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0405d7b4672519dfb9facba3f12dc7f3bc219a50f9f24447dd06a95d8fb206f2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 17): create has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (JSXAttribute, JSXAttribute::fix, JSXAttribute::fix, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-boolean-value.js"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de655605031580a3c6ad26f1f5416c7535306402ba0e053602efff6bc7f4f2f8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesSort.fixPropTypesSort (cyclomatic 16): propTypesSort.fixPropTypesSort has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 196, 188, 179). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypesSort.js"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6619ddc90249918e18782914f15c958d12f9fac0080809657835467207623575"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::ReturnStatement (cyclomatic 16): (anonymous)::ReturnStatement has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js"},"region":{"startLine":347}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b74f5bee80aa370c77ea2811444e5f952c798ebeb0ee2d787009ec3df03e44db"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 16): create has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 9 function items inside it that branch (getPropName, hasEmptyLines, checkSpacing, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-props-no-multi-spaces.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82abc434c91ba8b82236116b5f8f966b710c48987b2b49ba8e4632874a98d12d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::getNodeViolationType (cyclomatic 16): create::getNodeViolationType has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-bind.js"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d546c27502878bdb1fdd8559e3c5b2904ad48e03d12b63fe13d5c227885265d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cyclomatic 16): create has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement, JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), generateFixFunction, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-max-props-per-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"022d63187c3751b82d97a373d94096cb6c77494e0717c7e2ba004db529de5ffa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypes.propTypesInstructions (cognitive 338): propTypes.propTypesInstructions has cognitive complexity 338 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 135 (244 pts), boolean chains 70, loops 6 (9 pts), match/switch 3 (9 pts), error handling 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 121). Of this number, 237 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 101 belong to 18 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a160fd0acc7967602d5b16136efe03c24bc5f15e1f20a91c27d579e7eba8507"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Components.componentRule (cognitive 203): Components.componentRule has cognitive complexity 203 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 72 (120 pts), boolean chains 73, loops 5 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 51). Of this number, 184 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 19 belong to 6 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":287}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c222f5498da1a6315b53e7066d78e81cbff2e1082d313dc4f91d74b0435effa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 111): create has cognitive complexity 111 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 53 (69 pts), boolean chains 38, loops 2 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 17). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 111 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 34 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, AssignmentExpression, FunctionExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b029d816fddedd49773e900e3ca154af46d04ccf93a8eff48a5919299c9aeec3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::getStatelessComponent (cognitive 96): componentRule::getStatelessComponent has cognitive complexity 96 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29 (69 pts), boolean chains 24, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 42). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":479}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49360051e16e6d62c17d8e63e15e486307ce78aa07fdfbc574f2760e57b66379"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypes.usedPropTypesInstructions (cognitive 89): usedPropTypes.usedPropTypesInstructions has cognitive complexity 89 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 32 (49 pts), boolean chains 30, ternaries 4 (6 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 21). Of this number, 85 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 4 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":305}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bccb5153770fc91cd90dc4a341e237b7793ac94283ed29723f008a35e9980f28"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.convertReturnTypeToPropTypes (cognitive 86): DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.convertReturnTypeToPropTypes has cognitive complexity 86 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (78 pts), match/switch 1 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 65). Of this number, 29 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 57 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":764}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cff11c0fce7169c89c1893010e20bc3ceffb086cbf5ef10bccef6d3086c3c82e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 83): create has cognitive complexity 83 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 41 (63 pts), boolean chains 16, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 24). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 83 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 22 function items inside it that branch (checkIteratorElement, checkArrowFunctionWithJSX, getReturnStatements, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-key.js"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d9df2addcb0485c88d9ea5d43cf13c07c02c3b2e61c7ed082e262d4835f981e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 83): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 83 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 34 (41 pts), boolean chains 38, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 83 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 30 function items inside it that branch (getPropKey, Program:exit::(anonymous), getComponentTypeAnnotation, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/boolean-prop-naming.js"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce049fa0f96ed7d6642bfd57b7a7f7c7aab4c11c11402b836610853f49ab3dad"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 80): create has cognitive complexity 80 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 27 (45 pts), boolean chains 29, ternaries 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 20). Most of this is not in the body itself: 11 of the 80 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement, Program, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3f76b2aed591323868c11b251e3ae4e5fc8a326594039d6ff10057bed17fc16"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 72): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 34 (49 pts), boolean chains 19, loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 16). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 72 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (getRefPropIndexes::(anonymous), checkPropsOrder::(anonymous), comparePropsOrder, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-comp.js"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af125666c9c2cb421ca723c2270f94846b65e43ba7307527c0ac9395a7981fdd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 67): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 67 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 31 (38 pts), boolean chains 27, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 67 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 23 function items inside it that branch (ImportDeclaration, checkValidProp, checkValidCallExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-typos.js"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7127b6391776c62bc99c418dc19cb6f12954e79d4d6454e058fcabae76ddf7d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsUsed (cognitive 62): usedPropTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsUsed has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (35 pts), boolean chains 13, ternaries 4 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 25). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c0db899dfeb83055bb9182215b0cb8f788c51120b37d2bb5554d04f5a014645"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-sort-props.contextCompare (cognitive 58): jsx-sort-props.contextCompare has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (36 pts), boolean chains 15, ternaries 4 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"256463ea694ea7d591c2bdece11fdf9d87581d9f860d33cb0fe412f9ac172e27"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 52): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 32, if/else 13 (18 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 52 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 26 function items inside it that branch (ReturnStatement, MemberExpression, isPassingThrough, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc9cbc969d553ca5cc28f97289ca38b0f25b51a68e6865167e393953d474e40e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsDeclared (cognitive 45): propTypesInstructions::markPropTypesAsDeclared has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (24 pts), boolean chains 14, loops 3 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"364cbc6ad1d376d3b4792199b4b72cd49726d6df541c0b10ab93f6da95fb9316"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 45): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (21 pts), boolean chains 14, loops 5 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 13). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 45 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 17 function items inside it that branch (hasCustomDecorator, isPureRenderDeclared, hasPureRenderDecorator, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/require-optimization.js"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e60c7bd7dd6590cfafc0e88c3e66f5db380c6d4e7515c1bc6b4fb32701c8c420"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"defaultPropsInstructions (cognitive 43): defaultPropsInstructions has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (28 pts), boolean chains 15 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 43 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (MemberExpression, MethodDefinition, ClassProperty, PropertyDefinition, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/defaultProps.js"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cae3d33a866aefa932a1ac9249e33fee328af83c264c16956e6f7e5ca4f5042c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 43): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 9 (24 pts), if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 21). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 43 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle::(anonymous), reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle::(anonymous)::fix, reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-arrow-function-lifecycle.js"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c597ba063b5eb32c213ff93374910b8607c8f27d006f15ff5096519909612578"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-sort-props.getGroupsOfSortableAttributes (cognitive 41): jsx-sort-props.getGroupsOfSortableAttributes has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (32 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec5b2925715e6a614034a5998e4617849f7eb6abc44589a94dd8844d701d7065"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 41): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (20 pts), boolean chains 12, ternaries 3 (8 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 41 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (reportUnusedProperties, MemberExpression, VariableDeclarator, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-class-component-methods.js"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"311ff64bb2990ea7c79967ad3a42bc7c83bb755223591c79c9aceea997114230"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXOpeningElement (cognitive 41): create::JSXOpeningElement has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), boolean chains 12, ternaries 3 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"991d97857d61384347e6abe8a6e4207b714abeaaa3adac92335dd5475e379d42"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 40): create has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 26 (29 pts), boolean chains 10, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 40 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (getMapIndexParamName, isUsingReactChildren, checkPropValue, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-array-index-key.js"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bf2165071b4aac188779f83988bed8c105204d819fd6687e441620d31e97ca6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 39): create has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (18 pts), ternaries 8 (14 pts), match/switch 4, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 10). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 39 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement:exit::fix, JSXOpeningElement:exit, getExpectedLocation, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-closing-bracket-location.js"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efe046a61e896d24a19613cf0bc2028dc8ae87ba49f509ccd2fd7446e2875c99"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.isDestructuredFromPragmaImport (cognitive 35): isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.isDestructuredFromPragmaImport has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (29 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.js"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a9d86059c6873f99e4613dc51c14ed44cb66ab539c600ffd9ce39a044cb5421"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::CallExpression (cognitive 34): (anonymous)::CallExpression has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), ternaries 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 9 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/hook-use-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2ea37d109cd334a45502bd55cd41bcfc2d23f0ae1c86a2aaf825ee539cd3be3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-leaked-render.ruleFixer (cognitive 33): jsx-no-leaked-render.ruleFixer has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (22 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 14). Of this number, 23 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 10 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-leaked-render.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a226aab065bcd2b6689506549ab4ec2c1b31607f1d9f8f8f2a003b2c1deb198b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 32): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (16 pts), boolean chains 15, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 32 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (reportPropTypesWithoutDefault::(anonymous), reportFunctionComponent, Program:exit::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/require-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b9ef2fbacb04b26f1bf755983983207bd5dc276657b9eacc2856194ee5cf46d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cognitive 32): create::JSXAttribute has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (13 pts), if/else 5 (12 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js"},"region":{"startLine":486}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6349d7643f9769cee1822a2862d53b1e3fd4feb81d039454fe10eaa53ac65df6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 31): create has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (21 pts), boolean chains 10 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 31 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (refersToReactFragment, Program:exit::(anonymous), ImportDeclaration::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-fragments.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9913a171ae995e0816e808635e1c5aa3fcf7fd9bb00501c616d195adbd3ac76e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::validateBraceSpacing (cognitive 31): create::validateBraceSpacing has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (23 pts), ternaries 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb697bd920305b0a04debe28204d2d1894970aa610072021309f6ff3bb0f941"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::convertReturnTypeToPropTypes (cognitive 29): propTypesInstructions::convertReturnTypeToPropTypes has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (29 pts) (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":764}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1af4f7ce260aae0482f90081c9fd60ce3161ea0643514553cab3fea01ff60f86"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 29): create has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 18, if/else 7, ternaries 4. Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 16 function items inside it that branch (VariableDeclarator, checkDeprecation, getReactModuleName::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-deprecated.js"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46fb568a8fbcd0eb9a93ac21b514928b757ac6ff2ae10fba6971d85e10ae7ffa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 29): create has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), boolean chains 12, ternaries 3 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (canFix, checkNode, hasLessThanTwoChildren, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-useless-fragment.js"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8253faf27534fcfeb3d42e113525792857d7a2dd6943c4107982e4031b15f0a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::MemberExpression (cognitive 28): create::MemberExpression has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 5 (11 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-access-state-in-setstate.js"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4632858a6a8cbcd1c48dd8976ccf8ca95bc5b7ab1c28eb7ec6e4fc806f897bc4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 28): create has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 13, if/else 13, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 28 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (getNodeViolationType, JSXAttribute, VariableDeclarator, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-bind.js"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"758fe6b15234e9b5305af904cb1d4e7e6b52b0f0a34b68e872c9607f71cef32d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 28): create has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 10, ternaries 3 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 9). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (Program:exit::(anonymous)::(anonymous), isNonBlockComment, isBlockCommentInCurlyBraces, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-newline.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b2515ebd73c50e5abdc6f19c03641bee7ad6e0a8a62686141e09b7f001d8614"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.searchDeclarationByName (cognitive 27): DeclarePropTypesForTSTypeAnnotation.searchDeclarationByName has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). Of this number, 23 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 4 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":640}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16d6842e5465e2ae45b1ac3c970495c37af2a9d5c5de3109fe6982fd8acf25b8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 27): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (16 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 12 function items inside it that branch (MemberExpression, Identifier, ClassProperty, PropertyDefinition, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prefer-exact-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a362c1c586915a3ee80f9d7ed56d4a736a3ac7f76147143de495110b607ff543"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 27): create has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (16 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (getPropertyName, checkNode, findVariableByName, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47ebd0586c98290b00cbac150a6452849483a59f600aeeed66e8a70e326fcbd8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 27): create has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, if/else 7, ternaries 3. Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (JSXAttribute, (anonymous), isForbidden, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-component-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c103a300bd3a149fa420810a49ebb8601356a132345d26a5e9eab0b276d47e1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared (cognitive 26): propTypesInstructions::markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (15 pts), boolean chains 11 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":1043}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b6dd2369efd396f39d5b205fcdfb2b6798aeb30bf07ddd4170eda2bb1ecc343"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 26): create has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (15 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 9 function items inside it that branch (getPropertyName, checkNode, findVariableByName, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b37d1cc53e59cf8cc4d84c507ce262e1d8fd463a6fb61508ed92ca2d70614f5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 26): create has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), boolean chains 10, loops 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (findJSXElementOrFragment::find, getDepth, findJSXElementOrFragment, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-max-depth.js"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ea7d6465e006bcdf19130f5148b7012af1cacc8da2dedf0d57fd7a4569bfe39"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::getRelatedComponent (cognitive 25): componentRule::getRelatedComponent has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":655}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff2e9369c915073ad669930e37e018eba70ae5f982210904fa53123da2ed74a2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::internalIsDeclaredInComponent (cognitive 25): (anonymous)::internalIsDeclaredInComponent has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (17 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47c0a6841175cdeb662e40acd479eb5f5a0abaff02c1c29a9e732ed837192feb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 25): create has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (16 pts), ternaries 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (getNodeIndent, checkNodesIndent::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-indent-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0339ed2353a9760b784dc672c908b973a1d3b377fb3326a375f1392e79127e8c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 24): create has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 13, if/else 7 (9 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 24 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (findParentClassProperty, isAllowedAssignment, MemberExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-foreign-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03216475fdb6819c5b54a1abf30fe6a5e06e572af9021823c4ae25cdeb94a724"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::searchDeclarationByName (cognitive 23): propTypesInstructions::searchDeclarationByName has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":640}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"940b2ba31bdca1415087954f32edbfdfdedcc0a7c144a5781b20f0264040d3ca"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"componentRule::isReactHookCall (cognitive 23): componentRule::isReactHookCall has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 20, if/else 3. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":765}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82a00528452ebc0406d997453fab044deb9fc99dacc775d05948896bdf08e719"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::getOverrideConfig (cognitive 23): create::getOverrideConfig has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3640d1fb1b52ee6de48dd03d573f2e76508d7daf075c6a813115104266d04aa8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 23): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, if/else 10, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (getFixer, validate, VariableDeclaration, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/function-component-definition.js"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a87fa799fe644e2df4bdaf1c0524a2d7f4a11b513e0e663b9e747457de30ae2f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-target-blank.getStringFromValue (cognitive 22): jsx-no-target-blank.getStringFromValue has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (20 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7a702d498ff0f5c01437ddd68ffa28f275efff41c598636224ee47ed589b556"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::reportInvalidEntity (cognitive 22): create::reportInvalidEntity has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unescaped-entities.js"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea0c8d8740dae650ee39c4564a7b2c30adc771b395bd7f42802c7eac01649d6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-constructed-context-values.isConstruction (cognitive 21): jsx-no-constructed-context-values.isConstruction has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.js"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baf5468e48861c3e9cc507d4a4cd49f6bdf7f990ddcfa8676ca903350d7a6372"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesSort.sorter (cognitive 21): propTypesSort.sorter has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypesSort.js"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7d07b1c1e784a7b206dc9c8af27505de0914fed02b2e660d0d8358946fb28cc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"no-invalid-html-attribute.checkLiteralValueNode (cognitive 21): no-invalid-html-attribute.checkLiteralValueNode has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), ternaries 2 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 338, 363, 292). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-invalid-html-attribute.js"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd14f5d004faa5d52f066a67682613642cb618a6b83ff060413637e5b64fc0ec"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fixPropTypesSort (cognitive 21): fixPropTypesSort has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (sortInSource, sortInSource::(anonymous)::(anonymous), sortInSource::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypesSort.js"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32452b61304f5a5613afff12c3b5d816c5a73c2a8d039fba58c0985c4b8b2041"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleFunctionComponent (cognitive 21): create::handleFunctionComponent has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 9 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6739f73f855d87268cae61f4860483e22ffff6f3bb32266bef88b082728e14a5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 21): create has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 21 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, JSXElement, JSXAttribute, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-children-prop.js"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ccb991c78bb52e745c34881e5222a4f0cd6b6fdad8db424c90f47d91d4afc5b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::check (cognitive 21): create::check has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-wrap-multilines.js"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eb1c9ab01b9a83f989a62d3c0c0cf27f445063f147e01fecd6e0a9072505d1c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 21): create has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), loops 4 (6 pts), boolean chains 5, match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (checkIdentifierInJSX, JSXOpeningElement). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-undef.js"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dffd2adb457ffdc466a8e4ef1d2ffab812245a75532038b6a3aaca09ffa778e6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 21): create has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 8 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (JSXExpressionContainer \u003E LogicalExpression[operator=\u0022\u0026\u0026\u0022], JSXExpressionContainer \u003E ConditionalExpression, (anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-leaked-render.js"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e41235e23b295ebedc34bd85b89bfad99a2da93084cff1e455f88c69528d854"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cognitive 21): create::JSXAttribute has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 13, if/else 4, ternaries 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-handler-names.js"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b274685f8821d236d8059945a0c59886b14f22f76100176c635d938210ca669"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::isIdentifierShadowed (cognitive 21): (anonymous)::isIdentifierShadowed has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/display-name.js"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72f46793855833da177011cf4405b6eedcab280bc452d9bbcbdfae244f4bead1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 20): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 7 (8 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (reportNodeIncorrectlyPositioned, isContextInClass, MemberExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/static-property-placement.js"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdb287ad5481fb0b3e00f4dc6e7911c910a865c9c84fb966b242da9b894f6f99"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::getJSXElementName (cognitive 20): create::getJSXElementName has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (17 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95a4d1e57068b6632b6c267999f553b1cff86db83177e0f3e36c97872902196c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleOpeningElement (cognitive 20): create::handleOpeningElement has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 7, loops 3 (6 pts), ternaries 3 (4 pts), if/else 3 (nesting depth added 4). This file\u0027s own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes \u2014 or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-indent.js"},"region":{"startLine":342}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d54c6aeb1c0034ca50e9c97a1ca440e08dfb05bcbe13cad77c9e6285d5d4f160"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 20): create has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, checkExpression, JSXElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/button-has-type.js"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4710538472adb8f3cbb475255f8bc9117ec61f381350bf53896393d0057edc12"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"usedPropTypes.getPropertyName (cognitive 19): usedPropTypes.getPropertyName has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (17 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":273}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"657af0978e86c9fea5959cdf48c7bdf310a58551af8c9396637c7d61fab737d2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"propTypesInstructions::buildReactDeclarationTypes (cognitive 19): propTypesInstructions::buildReactDeclarationTypes has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":403}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d65085df7a5bd12e381a3e02451cd81d929b3ebe8de023ba162323bca89295af"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::CallExpression (cognitive 19): create::CallExpression has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/style-prop-object.js"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"331cc43ca994f53a0ab7e462f5eb0259711533667e5da0443a93a589e89733a3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXAttribute (cognitive 19): create::JSXAttribute has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unknown-property.js"},"region":{"startLine":579}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"895d3a839289e1c0c3f422ece0019361b3fdbee523e889a4018df8e980976634"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 19): create has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), ternaries 3 (5 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 9 function items inside it that branch (hasEmptyLines, checkSpacing::fix, getPropName, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-props-no-multi-spaces.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a3ab3a627420b74d11b7fa95059113cdbe0080ae284dcaeb0d8e294c5aa710d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::reportUnnecessaryCurly::fix (cognitive 19): create::reportUnnecessaryCurly::fix has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), ternaries 2 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"166afdd2308da57600999ed494d70c39d097a5f7f6ed67f212f4ffb32dae3b8b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-no-target-blank.attributeValuePossiblyBlank (cognitive 18): jsx-no-target-blank.attributeValuePossiblyBlank has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"247d3eeb3876ef943c159c00819a4eb1b9ee53d66a7083a1692e74d08f349db2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-tag-spacing.validateBeforeClosing (cognitive 18): jsx-tag-spacing.validateBeforeClosing has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06c0f6af48932ffae4984c673e10086f52f61565c632228eadd2ff8dc2b93701"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 18): create has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12, boolean chains 5, ternaries 1. Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, JSXElement, CallExpression::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/void-dom-elements-no-children.js"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f983c53fafb0e0f2ee8a35d12f0473b592ca526a1963c08bafe0e002ffb7a1a6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 18): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 7 (8 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 18 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (reportUnusedPropType::(anonymous), isPropUsed, reportUnusedPropType, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a402c5256dbb39b781a5fc9322b27ce4b7c4b9255a682474c43445bc08088f8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 18): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 6, loops 2. Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (AssignmentExpression, UpdateExpression, getOuterMemberExpression, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-direct-mutation-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"024348e0322ac369d72718fa59032ed7c9bd17788c0a154bbb606594def95f0b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::CallExpression (cognitive 18): create::CallExpression has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-danger-with-children.js"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed2ac58fe80c51e520954afcc1f9d225525150804e44b01362b9f9d0b5135428"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXOpeningElement (cognitive 18): create::JSXOpeningElement has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (7 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-pascal-case.js"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1923f6fb23d8fd998fb2881619fa94be2880779967e37e52d76c052c80eb089"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 18): create has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (7 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 4 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement, JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-max-props-per-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f57aab33a94bc0fbe6216d616703cb0b2ae05ffbb2dff4e6c410b8ce7160e55"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"no-invalid-html-attribute.checkCreateProps (cognitive 17): no-invalid-html-attribute.checkCreateProps has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-invalid-html-attribute.js"},"region":{"startLine":524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92ed86635402b3fe2c9c24fea18f8e3c38fe409ecedac835d13c3f0c116348c7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::validate (cognitive 17): (anonymous)::validate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unstable-nested-components.js"},"region":{"startLine":413}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5c235b67a0d897d736f07607a65b593d81f7790d9fa0657158c524547f8ef78"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 17): create has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, if/else 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 17 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement, JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous), JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous)::fix, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-first-prop-new-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68cb1dbc27d82025274e98306b1af6abbc10dd811a00c6d20b7b57f2a03601e1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 17): create has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, ternaries 4, if/else 2. Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (JSXAttribute, (anonymous)). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-dom-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d7a74afdf0b6ea28d6d9fbda503dfee12a2dd4fa1fc8506016fe08398921598"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous)::VariableDeclarator (cognitive 17): (anonymous)::VariableDeclarator has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dffd3d6754b056cdd7f93bcd3a0c683b54fb551e881c789ec6eec9ade9aca002"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jsx-tag-spacing.validateClosingSlash (cognitive 16): jsx-tag-spacing.validateClosingSlash has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"923552c4cfeb60e884339e528e47c9e0fa722326e9049eb14185d50432bb391d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::JSXSpreadAttribute (cognitive 16): create::JSXSpreadAttribute has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 6. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-props-no-spreading.js"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b969358d6bd5f74697681794d950fdd5de08e2ca2d86a0c9a5b0bd1667db1a91"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::handleJSX (cognitive 16): create::handleJSX has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 8, if/else 5 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-one-expression-per-line.js"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de6c0cd64cabb8478863e65e2bdb9d9d6b8c92a02e25d69cc825856d0ea3b38a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"(anonymous) (cognitive 16): (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (JSXOpeningElement, JSXOpeningElement::(anonymous)). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.js"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2e48619b971411d6bcffb51c2fb4a01db4d32ed729a9f0830dfa31561f37b1b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 16): create has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 8, if/else 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (Program:exit, handleJSX, (anonymous)). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-filename-extension.js"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4156d0c30c478d1686f79f3348c86a84ceba1590a1a9ba79b488f1291aaa3aa0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 16): create has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 12, if/else 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 0 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (handleJSX::(anonymous), elementName, isInlineElement, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-child-element-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b91e3f2ee8dcec11fc5c80257a4b9182561cf269bf20012d53c4a7fb7d2c95"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create::ImportDeclaration (cognitive 16): create::ImportDeclaration has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ff8d97b39e833339041753a38d5e24fd174f1a08261f69eb90ff48ae507f2b0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"create (cognitive 16): create has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8, boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (CallExpression, reportIfForbidden, (anonymous), \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-elements.js"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf2d524e17c953488b641976308ea4da8cadacfb9be3d9837aefe0d216c45bd2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: Components.componentRule: FunctionTooLong \u2014 componentRule runs 374 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 274 over it, 3.74\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":287}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9066cf89d63a4c1a0aa3fd597c3d9a1c57d7a20e0209730d95de37b7c00f9f77"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: util/propTypes.js: FileTooLong \u2014 726 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 226 over it, 1.45\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c20e012fe161b3b271d0baedeab8b62a00b1a3fb0d4a36e167a3a1543ed507dd"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: util/Components.js: FileTooLong \u2014 513 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units), about 73% of them inside a single declaration: componentRule (287-953). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 13 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c55f56da614d35eec0fcb1e3aa369124cf00cf44a8168defa03a255c846cf00d"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 2 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js, lib/rules/display-name.js. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbb00217dcc6812656b9f01049897d76fce47a2f6f30c2eab4dc00829a53e740"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76e9e8d7f365fbaa7fb4693250d331c1019c0f37bef3fce68f3e29e6434c9640"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7b4178faec08b10d171a40adab30f2be1bc7070c35c3b14fe63fec22d0b4554"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e8efad1cd098e9e3c2a338e21b56951d65581331b24dfc6a508247ff2128e5a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c72a00c1140ea570c6e2d1329254584a2cddbe9edd6deab1b81546c7df862a0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"788941e6a15aba9b74d250e46a391a879fd4def927c2b3273252085d55848ded"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd47a80e59a3f2641d429e213ef29938881ba2310c8765da1199c39dee429eec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e94d3971bf2b59b66d3bd4025efd7c1a7fd5196d21c142aaf99c05a5d68804b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e734f5860084f5ddf1cfbd9d54c6464b8666884deeecd7dfc36a003f4c78a804"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bba2d9665bde393a0cdfbec03a91927c28b3d27dc5a58a1744a6682d7c473cd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3089657a9b9b71bd0917a1ac5380a49c108c9aefdd87fb2e044fd1d058790645"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"944c9e15a6c41afc9725513e8c68bf0313e2f0b3ea9b207bfb0f857d427fc5de"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"addd60fc8825241f1d4c1a459ea4146cf48e684bb35f8550220337fb2a5f7e1f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d6f387511f3c0e0704917ea626c9ac4d26d2cbd2c11dc93ef19d28c373c0e81"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80bfc37602506aa4221a3526a101ae7ece78cd8445589f0d3d0b0db5196f87cf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"812d471fded1dda34a9bfbf9f668bb26d3f9336d0f8606df356dac44b3648c7d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f699ae6b293bab14956baad4b5041e49cd8bf0bab67ec3c81088603613dea34"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ed360fdca912ad90c594243dcb677c496be0e313f147b98864fea73aa2ee48a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d7f1856a0a18be760f25b01c2e036dbff9cc4c020e9188a75a5ccc5f410ffe4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"102297e6723bbb05be4d31cca85053040e168008649a97627ddb6d36906c0e6e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e4b6934177ebd9319f4d44215a3575a361dd5196e371e1a08ee26d927a7578"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1219c60fa80c41d254baed3d2c54d547f5ce25819297efa981529aef9f57abaa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1a09ac57926699ff6535b45efd17217fd57d1872f33cc8ffaf11640f77eb849"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06509984c051af61f744cddb84189e296a84053a0e9a3324139eaf2d78833a78"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77ffa01462c0e11caf8bb4550963952990f1b28b6289c30e7664032c71d261d6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f9620fbbb8bf1cf94ac701210723b2f74e09203b6726fd3c340c4d8355b26d2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-214","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-532","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"674573f0e802a6d7df484b7a9f8a927630bd6bb59a3db12498c329bb9326611a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a387492acaf6c216d24083f22363244ebf0c15a077146aa16051ba0919468376"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bb095b60e1b8eb7998e9cc81ee900ed7fb849c097b74f1037cc42b94f6776ae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-269","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f42940591b2fd3a584718a5cb525ff4456bc245235b9a7aa26b87ce37e7c9ae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b120fc4197a16ef66e67aba533764ec201fc7b3423cbd6818fa485fc4dbc333"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"693249723480b7d3690fbc9002e4acaa2fd5c4f5277d52948268b51530c89d1e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3569a32170072e14e15af408275874e6c32eb652067a9bf63f79c70b25b8255"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"324594e377be9e262800216e11a8aa6914d1a0fb6e7cb45e617822a14bf3ab67"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42e9d6301c053362bf0ce37242fc71d90cc3de86ff5d08eaaf6a8b1b31766102"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e4a3da4814ee729ffa982efe94b2ac690a35309d3581b74bc43540424fc620e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b973b7348943596fc832712a044bcbae367e2509e64241736044800cc7164b7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77c2db66395c52bc7f70e211ef90b48727019d4259a2fc33dc2fc6924fa2e689"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"102b8fa4896513df0d65a5a7e654146905bc88d283a4b6976ea241ffcf981450"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4d8ffb584158259b92e537c40e268340fdba00704a7f9e51493faeab2f4ff50"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdc08c284bf3d64e2757b5df1aec9ccfb9e7f71d465c97bc4f4379deb1415c00"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8af93b54d7b6d09176d9c9016e65470b9e3497c2e30cd6af0b8b0a89230292a4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2be387476a2da4ceb246a496c5eaf6e51395fec98798ab47bf4f63419cb5746"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2073088bf2ac2d69ba42e20a04d222711c06d330e73922c48e2afc9678f739c2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83624e2a75b102d656da943ab10c203006d969612030d1669428c03d4067940e"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 35 of 98 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 98 of the 137 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: lib/rules/no-invalid-html-attribute.js, lib/rules/no-unused-state.js, lib/rules/no-unstable-nested-components.js, lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js, lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js, lib/rules/jsx-closing-bracket-location.js, lib/rules/no-deprecated.js, lib/rules/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.js (and 27 more). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0752d0df7434000fcabf1048e2de30a7a1a8b982b3db9a19898c4dec199856b4"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfa852b10b1daca743783c7e9171073f8e8df646fce30a8d2c962f4ce5e84903"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5928b81075799790cb18fed2980a6b6e8aa5072772041c9951633efe8eb3542"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"D43","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca77df8ac0ed56a2e42b0923be81cca477f3174e98a1dc599981adac6a376eef"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage collected but not gated: CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum \u2014 coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool\u0027s minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository\u0027s CI files AND its coverage configuration \u2014 the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited \u2014 matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f63c06044cf998d9a0698692df30d8873e29bc9b0c98ee829255017c1193d33"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s javascript-typescript pack, \u0060semgrep --config=p/javascript\u0060, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 20269 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (74 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js:9 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-default-props.js:9 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 74 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7236e939fc9c297915c80f8685615cf611c7c777be7688dc51aced9a7bc02e6e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:41 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:71 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76fdf84c50b518c2aa9119c9be62a795b13c8dee9b45aa4b18914994bfb0e776"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/no-multi-comp.js:29 \u00B7 lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js:38 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-multi-comp.js"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8368a66ec9d605b51268ed92d766eb364b582a13d00e5237257f4b58e35a04b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-curly-newline.js:133 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-curly-newline.js:151 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-newline.js"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"194bc7b69bf1190709ec04fa5408db7f4f7161dc4218cc4b4e0ddb7b32624b36"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 3 locations): lib/rules/jsx-no-undef.js:28 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js:37 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-default-props.js:32 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-undef.js"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f28bef7c5760e60887136d1f103cb927db8998537606fce238e7d1519687e9a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:108 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:195 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90a559a0f968615a2f4e7f0c91324a67ea8887ccbdf130049ab8998acd285058"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 4 locations): lib/rules/jsx-no-duplicate-props.js:27 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-no-undef.js:28 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js:37 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-default-props.js:32 \u2014 the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-duplicate-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"738919e293987316683b95b1ca5b7f0fec176aad63b430db4e6d09de7dbf6bd4"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/forbid-prop-types.js:159 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:186 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56c696bba7d5c238ac3d1c92fb3a09235a399705ade9c361a3e87cdeac7b2fa8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/no-unused-class-component-methods.js:62 \u00B7 lib/rules/no-unused-state.js:30 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-unused-class-component-methods.js"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0104a80b4c8dd12355ff965d93a5d96b46c2bb007386e8b7a2ee50f62d3f01fc"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (14 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/no-arrow-function-lifecycle.js:133 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-comp.js:429 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 52 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-arrow-function-lifecycle.js"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4020045bb75a0748a4a7c45ea22188fc9a2840747cb84a55617b32eb1c0b415c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/void-dom-elements-no-children.js:89 \u00B7 lib/rules/void-dom-elements-no-children.js:148 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/void-dom-elements-no-children.js"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c594e5202fcd6e3f220acc92855744ad6e08c08a6bc4b6b4bff21010101797fd"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/iframe-missing-sandbox.js:75 \u00B7 lib/rules/iframe-missing-sandbox.js:98 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 53 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/iframe-missing-sandbox.js"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9e62258c4d410d90623f71d6d5035114d1fd35db477ceff585893e1933db8b8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js:204 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js:225 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":204}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f96e0cf78503b1cdcfcbb38f3196c1b01d5fb55509bdf36cd67d4cbb7b27f1e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (13 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/defaultProps.js:169 \u00B7 lib/util/defaultProps.js:212 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 65 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/defaultProps.js"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc8208db78bf54a5caac29c584c8d2a0bdfb480ea89cc2ac08fd459a08aba00f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3 locations): lib/rules/jsx-pascal-case.js:111 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js:426 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:72 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-pascal-case.js"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99b5e796331b1cf19c029a17f8fd00d6d80160f4db2e4a18c64e118bd2b0e821"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/prop-types.js:50 \u00B7 lib/rules/require-default-props.js:55 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d9ca2958bf21230b652cadb815e5b742228a94b263dbb70579a50638b1c7e6b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/require-optimization.js:159 \u00B7 lib/rules/static-property-placement.js:104 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/require-optimization.js"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1a2066091c3a6a0c5fe4939a2abfc9224aa26876b850345a241387da745dc1a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/linkComponents.js:20 \u00B7 lib/util/linkComponents.js:33 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/linkComponents.js"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdf8e7c86db0270835eb6cdbb81ab0cd824204c6ff1118c8b678b498a7bd8ad7"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:225 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js:236 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-tag-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":225}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34d62370c6b8035e6d82308fe71cbb3d50c08797a3ad1fe5be44f7b6732f51f9"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/no-is-mounted.js:36 \u00B7 lib/util/makeNoMethodSetStateRule.js:93 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 59 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-is-mounted.js"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d76259750e94b792ca93028e7cc3556354af9173dd385474aceb35b69d9476a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (11 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:250 \u00B7 lib/util/propTypes.js:1186 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1027bff4234d9b142b46d6def224a984b48cb9c1d687561d466f21432cf423b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/Components.js:869 \u00B7 lib/util/Components.js:882 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":869}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"580592243cfa4f6371f494c51a41f764479d8d06f144381df6c5defb07ebbddd"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (10 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js:166 \u00B7 lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js:256 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 56 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"707e531bbc7be84fe77795cd8152fea913305412135cfddad273c22ef92b7d15"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-wrap-multilines.js:215 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-wrap-multilines.js:228 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-wrap-multilines.js"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d45ce7e3485c419c334021747d33e0fb2933fb5ea619b5f0e2a1a5f3f56471f5"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (9 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js:424 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js:501 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 50 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-literals.js"},"region":{"startLine":424}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d24148e306a0e41bae92e328a8af2f8ea52d2c1908cff25ff5d01bd1362295f4"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js:247 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js:434 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":247}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"765d58089b99f3f86f4f78191628d88196912f5e6ee5414e031a57e5c852effc"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js:383 \u00B7 lib/rules/require-render-return.js:92 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/prefer-stateless-function.js"},"region":{"startLine":383}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f057c09a2982a24cc8ca060a92bb1e80dfa4d7121c2779f8fe36c16fd88714c9"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:215 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:225 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3be5a7bb384c55dd4f10b51061d3023cf76f400ad6fae1cc55ed21f3a458ac3f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:294 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js:304 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-prop-types.js"},"region":{"startLine":294}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a905287b01730a5fe3764a08f0f16688dc4c026c1294b0e3aff9ccaa616c0f5b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/Components.js:549 \u00B7 lib/util/Components.js:560 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":549}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c37d9130786c3c77a0cfd42ffbb66d969d2e0605d2a5654b8d8052fe739ade85"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-boolean-value.js:138 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-boolean-value.js:155 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-boolean-value.js"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eee5bad50cc330e2212012408f12d43114c3de187e0e35e2de5b83cecfe58eb"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js:320 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js:330 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ddd0944b1f5d90bc34015451505b9bd2d571fa367c398d567bb6b7c26b08f46"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js:188 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js:251 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2805999c2ef5babfc29bcf6618b3dc3054b7ed2a5b087ff78a03eab8cb81e8f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/no-typos.js:180 \u00B7 lib/rules/no-typos.js:188 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/no-typos.js"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51f9383e0eff3705b092659b2f193b6fb93f8cf4a8a195821a489feb3bc8d122"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/props.js:14 \u00B7 lib/util/props.js:29 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/props.js"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3b50040bbc38f0500f847da4b13336226f0b202a8e03726fc7689205314a152"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): configs/all.js:5 \u00B7 configs/recommended.js:5 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct \u2014 and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal\u0027s entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins \u2014 a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"configs/all.js"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77444cc374a528997f44bdd8504a9172628925e3f7d558089d757145da4d449e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/forbid-component-props.js:133 \u00B7 lib/rules/forbid-dom-props.js:100 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/forbid-component-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7a79274477ad1f6a102695b50143703b9da4befbe6118b1e7297f7fb5b18d45"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3 locations): lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js:101 \u00B7 lib/rules/sort-default-props.js:95 \u00B7 lib/util/variable.js:68 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape \u2014 one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values \u2014 and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb8cb0c105fbca3ce05426a71815e7117540ab8caae91414d21f1e6647a919cb"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/util/Components.js:523 \u00B7 lib/util/Components.js:531 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":523}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"839d5b70f3edadbb583cfed2f41d34a4394d33e2447dd64223e5f0b1d8dd1615"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): lib/rules/jsx-props-no-multi-spaces.js:62 \u00B7 lib/rules/jsx-props-no-multi-spaces.js:86 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-props-no-multi-spaces.js"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24ee3475fde9952c870b49c1ade1588a45f416ba5a4015f5e65e93f6f6d496c1"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function getStatelessComponent (cyclomatic 69, cognitive 96): getStatelessComponent has cyclomatic complexity 69 and cognitive complexity 96; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":479}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adc3fbd48dd081340530f135bf0915e6341d92f8c540dd7bda046b74b9945a5f"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 48, cognitive 67): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 48 and cognitive complexity 67; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":456}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eccca43f2bb723af798f598d4eb38384ce71dbf97074221d9c64895294512d62"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function contextCompare (cyclomatic 43, cognitive 58): contextCompare has cyclomatic complexity 43 and cognitive complexity 58; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":72}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"67843a51e9a66986fa0192a75c10e37d0816179c3a42fd41fa1b39e29c867756"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function markPropTypesAsDeclared (cyclomatic 43, cognitive 45): markPropTypesAsDeclared has cyclomatic complexity 43 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d5c425b4808eff201788646b797dd627d09ee65903ea4bedd54fb310ced63f5"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function markPropTypesAsUsed (cyclomatic 38, cognitive 62): markPropTypesAsUsed has cyclomatic complexity 38 and cognitive complexity 62; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/usedPropTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d21f8b1639cd9b8a36a01798ecf4b48e8fe522468d763da33b2205cca810a442"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 38, cognitive 20): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 38 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tests/helpers/parsers.js"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4768c2b87bcbfb53edd8d199b12464359bf39cbd0abf8135dae8836fab592a74"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function isReactHookCall (cyclomatic 36, cognitive 23): isReactHookCall has cyclomatic complexity 36 and cognitive complexity 23; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/Components.js"},"region":{"startLine":765}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b74777e0554af09a973f5f1508494cafdfa849a8d7af5292d094b097a602395d"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function CallExpression (cyclomatic 30, cognitive 34): CallExpression has cyclomatic complexity 30 and cognitive complexity 34; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/hook-use-state.js"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"051f57b6c1c152985a2ad0b920793135e40e8d832016028ece05fa09322d8482"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function isConstruction (cyclomatic 30, cognitive 21): isConstruction has cyclomatic complexity 30 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-constructed-context-values.js"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"466aaa98ca7df746fd32d3c09fd0f608587955280cf657c3cdf97a2e39568645"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function JSXOpeningElement (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 41): JSXOpeningElement has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 41; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-no-target-blank.js"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71d95171b8219117519e12e4086c06a32f4abaadc39cae7d84ccad6e8bf2bde8"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 26): markAnnotatedFunctionArgumentsAsDeclared has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 26; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":1043}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf95ce15f31a48ffbb5ab7cf26d796199699ec7ebe0acb7cb3213a11c7e39eab"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function VariableDeclarator (cyclomatic 27, cognitive 17): VariableDeclarator has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/destructuring-assignment.js"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e6f55526c024cea07eddeef56e21caf0ff91f0e1ddb079eeca6490ef1b94bab"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function hasTranspilerName (cyclomatic 27, cognitive 13): hasTranspilerName has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/display-name.js"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d23fb67d4bcf96f447bed340095e60c6b9d7d849f588635ad30decc3a73b35e"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function validateBraceSpacing (cyclomatic 25, cognitive 31): validateBraceSpacing has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-spacing.js"},"region":{"startLine":355}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4d13b25945a923121198d47797127d7f769c127dd995d34c8df2613561b7482"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function buildReactDeclarationTypes (cyclomatic 25, cognitive 19): buildReactDeclarationTypes has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/propTypes.js"},"region":{"startLine":403}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6bab77a7dc4e0adebd967f7994e118b83b7de6c900a325bad0c5dd09fceb9de"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function isDestructuredFromPragmaImport (cyclomatic 22, cognitive 35): isDestructuredFromPragmaImport has cyclomatic complexity 22 and cognitive complexity 35; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/util/isDestructuredFromPragmaImport.js"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f39f66adeb3d6261f1bd65f5dd555df2d33e01e8b4a3ea246158730ef5d05d7f"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function JSXAttribute (cyclomatic 22, cognitive 21): JSXAttribute has cyclomatic complexity 22 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-handler-names.js"},"region":{"startLine":155}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c6b0ed57bfac863660cf0ae1673932c3ece128397eb869e05d9bacbf68b09df"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function lintUnnecessaryCurly (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 14): lintUnnecessaryCurly has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.js"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e94949fe1f8f3e1e57c5f80cecb6c046f6e10650a467b9b3aa70aebf0d9dafac"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function getGroupsOfSortableAttributes (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 41): getGroupsOfSortableAttributes has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 41; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7301ea041d6bef1c386969ec5881766f1aef81104446884e3fcf2959aaa530ae"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 31): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/sort-comp.js"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21218036de142a48152faa659d6f3dce9ce0a034af0a12a7d376b0b435ed60ff"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Large Files: 12 file(s) over 400 lines (counted as significant lines \u2014 blank lines excluded \u2014 over production source only, tests excluded), largest first: lib/util/propTypes.js (1198), lib/util/Components.js (855), lib/rules/no-unknown-property.js (624), lib/rules/no-invalid-html-attribute.js (586), lib/rules/jsx-sort-props.js (526), lib/util/usedPropTypes.js (510) (\u002B6 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cecee31b569df4f07e06db732f1ca037af27b5afef9023da51f9673d931a142f"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027glob\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70383cf03107da7b95199f32558be143fecec5ce4ab29af9b166270952e6c145"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027jackspeak\u0027: Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"495f30bca1ada5d46074722bdc2b24d30c910647f8efcf4a3b95386ddfc91583"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JavaScript dependencies are not locked: No package-lock.json / yarn.lock / pnpm-lock.yaml / bun.lock \u2014 JS installs aren\u0027t reproducible (SSDF PW.4.4). Commit your package manager\u0027s lockfile and install from it (\u0060npm ci\u0060, \u0060yarn --immutable\u0060, \u0060pnpm i --frozen-lockfile\u0060 or \u0060bun i --frozen-lockfile\u0060). Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40a08798dc9f9c819eaa9f7c084938e1cf2517a9281aed2c31563d6f7d5ba90d"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060node.key || [\u0027MethodDefinition\u0027, \u0027Property\u0027].indexOf(node.type) !== -1\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js, lib/rules/sort-default-props.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/rules/jsx-sort-default-props.js"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6580130ffd2da44cd10fa89a238a40e8af21afed98d5910d89767eae3b0c9f45"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"CWE-1104","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1104"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"CWE-1329","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1329"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-214","guid":"b10ad120-fb22-1351-9348-aa23b453e815","name":"CWE-214","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-214"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/214.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-269","guid":"70e1f5f6-81e5-4e5a-ba40-b541c3a346e2","name":"CWE-269","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-269"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/269.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"CWE-522","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-522"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-532","guid":"1cd8877a-76e8-ce54-b40b-779af23364a0","name":"CWE-532","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-532"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/532.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"CWE-829","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-829"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":53,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}