{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module_Keyboard.Feed (cyclomatic 48): Module_Keyboard.Feed has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85fefb32acb228c5f52140c98b758c1c903ada24ceba54c010a744109c1aaef5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FrmMain.Timer1_Tick (cyclomatic 26): FrmMain.Timer1_Tick has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29c58b33303c54fb8ee6331a435e8268d863bcc0df625302b7156c5cea03a971"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FrmMain.Timer1_Tick (cognitive 59): FrmMain.Timer1_Tick has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01f82d95ed2a8d1cd940958936c740fe8ce7ba4916a4ba421f5a027ca1ea32e4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FrmMain.CompareWindowNames (cognitive 36): FrmMain.CompareWindowNames has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":908}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59f5d1ca2cb1d017f830f69cc44b5a6334cd64940ba7a9e21b3cac973f365217"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FrmMain.Timer2_Tick (cognitive 24): FrmMain.Timer2_Tick has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":686}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4b340f5114032acbbb5fa72400b03403dfa5c57b2247a6323db0d259bb0fc39"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module_Keyboard.Feed (cognitive 21): Module_Keyboard.Feed has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a3d0dd58db1195eb06eae74efba612cb2ead2d64b64a82d1c3a830dcc0fffdb"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: FrmMain.Timer1_Tick: MethodTooLong \u2014 Timer1_Tick runs 156 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 56 over it, 1.56\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d469630b241a33b16d1a8ea7321df9c18286a7633610ca6f67e6a9dd211caeb1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: FrmMain: TooManyMethods \u2014 706 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 45 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 15 over it, 1.50\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0146af1c339d02c6ca864113f637219f95e4b0225ae06d675cb0bc6c5546ca4a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./FrmMain.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 712 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 212 over it, 1.42\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2064de23583d602d6b0322164203984f4b661c878f71d0ffbb4b0033e3905db2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: FrmSettings: TooManyMethods \u2014 296 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 34 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 4 over it, 1.13\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmSettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4d5af6323188e1a5a25ab17cb194e5d262d5e69edd306b082c5df4d0c3948dce"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): FrmAbout.vb:15-76 | FrmEditor.vb:31-52 | FrmMimicOptions.vb:6-23 | FrmSettings.vb:95-162 | FrmVerHistory.vb:8-37 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce85d25e34ab85cd8b90f50082ad38361642ebe37d617e8a555fafd7302adc67"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): FrmEditor.vb:31-43 | FrmMimicOptions.vb:10-22 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmEditor.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"996f3afb5d67eff7d7b6a2db4b3670198ce8d59f037f819ed444ec171124f66f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 4): FrmAbout.vb:67-76 | FrmEditor.vb:36-43 | FrmMimicOptions.vb:15-22 | FrmVerHistory.vb:30-37 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 4 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2a12e1548f0851e475d8b8e529b01ad7b3da3ec87ae0ef4fbdbc76ad69eeea0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): FrmAbout.vb:63-72 | FrmSettings.vb:138-147 | FrmVerHistory.vb:26-35 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060FrmSettings.vb:149\u0060 calls \u0060ListPrograms\u0060 and \u0060FrmAbout.vb:75\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ee43d26bb4b589d1f9cd098ee495517e9ab744931d5cb4676ac8b1e4ce5505e"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: FrmMain (LCOM4 7): FrmMain\u0027s methods fall into 7 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 7 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e85d2da8bff2ee10f5a3b89e07dbe6fae3800ae0d5bae1c8e53b59fd8b52e443"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: FrmMain.vb: FrmMain.vb changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 26 in FrmMain.Timer1_Tick at line 285. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2025-01-31..2025-05-01, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272025-01-31 13:19:53 \u002B03:00\u0027 --until=\u00272025-05-01 13:19:53 \u002B03:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- FrmMain.vb\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"425b3f25d5dd4bec7fdc7da680c8cf365b6ea673dcbb194803cc1e3929324347"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"588fdda3375879327fa2db8a4e90b72d985eeb85e539685368428f41a2565517"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edf45cea9713aa40502cbf7a53b174334fdef473bfa71432743b275c753e29c6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmAbout.vb"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97e13905f7eb08f59ed9c750ab19fc5336b1c26fdf9a953167bee85fc64041d8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmDisplayFocusedWindow.vb"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a62068e921e1916f379606cc460108e310597f63ab4213fabcb360af53d8143"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecd67f4603f4a37d13f1654c501fd300b69dbb719afece5ffff18967f6d9ec63"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":934}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"366c4fdba01cab3cdf6b292e73d1e049e1599008a56364a14e2330958504dbe2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":960}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f01cb0fa8b3954fa9eab8357f9e891417c76a2c56c3bb10d1cbbf1931af3c39"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1068}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"199134ffda6e73559b8744cb181d8138042758162278f2efe179f2b896b3a731"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmSettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":214}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"044e6111cf06055fe5871dde5cb30558cd589d086bf972ad14e696783100c538"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmSettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":222}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebcf0f6f55e4d1499079779d9ff585966990f9a54ab6e3a853e097f0df1fddc4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmSettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":451}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fd0b8eaa601d173f392b7c93f1fc2a422795cd4e3ae2f0d35882939530d6cbf"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmVerHistory.vb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b9efc24641f949a07a328b94434852aefb378cb34742158918c6fe8bf67905e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ModuleVariables.vb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1028559f3937a51febe67694cba432c2faef304981c930c225f85f4b3c5d53c6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ModuleVariables.vb"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b33b70d898ad4737b0224ecd3245b44e9caab20e2000d63497a805b2c55000b5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Module_Log.vb"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df66357f9c0ebf297cfb8c0d265323e71d9371b9fb1301dd655f64690d482ac2"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: No install, build, or setup steps are present for the project. Add a short Install section covering how to download/extract the archive, add the executable to the Windows startup folder (or use Start Menu shortcut), and configure any prerequisites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: No usage examples or \u0027how to run it\u0027 guidance. Add a short Usage section showing how to launch KeyzPal, select the keys to indicate, set auto-start options, and configure sounds/notifications."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no architecture or design documentation: No architecture or design documentation is present. Create an Architecture document describing the key-normalization flow, CAPS LOCK switching logic, hardware integration, and any non-GUI components."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"086460f2da112d94904fac5439f54a7780bc7778ff9375a067e428a1cc9a8a4c"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FrmMain.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c914e9a4d1cfc7ddfd1f16d7a157fc0e65b44d0306e53dbdce4eb68b73e1642"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further orphaned files (smaller): 8 smaller file(s) also have no living knowledge \u2014 folded into the freshness score and metrics rather than raised one row each \u2014 most significant first: FrmSettings.vb, ModuleVariables.vb, Module1.vb, FrmAbout.vb, FrmEditor.vb, FrmMimicOptions.vb, ModINIFunctions.vb, FrmDonate.vb (9 orphaned of 9 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 9 of the 16 production source files in this repository met that bar). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s mixed at the repository root with everything else the repository holds, so nothing marks which files are the product."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests/ separation: No test surface was found \u2014 this check walked the tree for authored source in the languages it models (\u0060.cs\u0060, \u0060.vb\u0060, \u0060.fs\u0060, \u0060.java\u0060, \u0060.kt\u0060, \u0060.scala\u0060, \u0060.py\u0060, \u0060.php\u0060, \u0060.rb\u0060, \u0060.ex\u0060, \u0060.exs\u0060, \u0060.go\u0060, \u0060.erl\u0060, \u0060.hrl\u0060, \u0060.swift\u0060, \u0060.dart\u0060, \u0060.rs\u0060, \u0060.ts\u0060, \u0060.tsx\u0060, \u0060.mts\u0060, \u0060.cts\u0060) and found none of it test-shaped. \u2605 \u0060.js\u0060, \u0060.jsx\u0060, \u0060.mjs\u0060 and \u0060.cjs\u0060 are NOT in that walk, so a Jest or Mocha suite written in plain JavaScript is invisible to it and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than moving anything. Otherwise there are no tests here to separate from production code, so the folder question hasn\u0027t been reached yet."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"999e0c784909c76b6346a705ee63961fe363ed1cd6a94e3f80e2ebe7820ccd5d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims a hardware project Mimic_For_KeyzPal exists but the evidence shows no such project \u2014 searched for: \u0060Mimic_For_KeyzPal\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343bbbd51ceb8de7a9ff88d79f7c797abf9b5921f8727b67b4d0f4f8a22c5e49"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}