{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RxHttpExtensions.generateRxHttpExtendFun (cyclomatic 27): RxHttpExtensions.generateRxHttpExtendFun has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da27b3d3ae08ad5f902ad2d489243f35e59b7d55e987b0528f62d75bf0ff979d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"KspKt.toKParameterSpec (cyclomatic 20): KspKt.toKParameterSpec has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/Ksp.kt"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce0f04f920c2d312ca791e2b4c3eed6d1edf7d3f1b82e261a974432a18cff063"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParamsVisitor.getMethodList (cyclomatic 17): ParamsVisitor.getMethodList has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df417be64413a8474a31452425f5827369af810b5b2e64783ca3589a3f48bb39"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParamsVisitor.getFunList (cyclomatic 17): ParamsVisitor.getFunList has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14502f89164bdff630780deb042ca00d4c96cd469cac6c33c6f144f76b4c35db"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LogUtil.multipartBody2Str (cyclomatic 16): LogUtil.multipartBody2Str has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/LogUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8056c27c9caa22a6f0d1dfe53508edba5b5a186dc281baeea4e0363d14b07370"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LogUtil.multipartBody2Str (cognitive 30): LogUtil.multipartBody2Str has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), error handling 2 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/LogUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ef20e544bc12c411296901f568675873b1b21a2b5acbf232f6a1aab8a214c12"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RxHttpExtensions.generateRxHttpExtendFun (cognitive 26): RxHttpExtensions.generateRxHttpExtendFun has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca6568c7f48d29a0fcffca4554a3a467556bf7f97da2c74cc579b208e3c5868a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CacheUtil.excludeCacheKey (cognitive 21): CacheUtil.excludeCacheKey has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (18 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/CacheUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d77aadb50c6897bd4af3c1941bf3e2172b267d66bf7bcd366ae5b1e46ffb2b3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParserVisitorKt.getToObservableXxxFun (cognitive 19): ParserVisitorKt.getToObservableXxxFun has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ParserVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edec76f1f2e20611fab63867d3c959102504f41c4e99a5b1c52d58499f9bd387"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParserVisitorKt.getToObservableXxxFun (cognitive 19): ParserVisitorKt.getToObservableXxxFun has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParserVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85a109e6042c447d335751dce7133c80ecd80e55900f9b9e5d10321bf83d39fa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"OkHttpCompat.newDiskLruCache (cognitive 19): OkHttpCompat.newDiskLruCache has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: error handling 4 (13 pts), if/else 5 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/OkHttpCompat.java"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cc6570674afdca2a8c9a3a3b02ab29e69581cee3e343714d10c76a9e33b9815"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LogUtil.log (cognitive 18): LogUtil.log has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (16 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/LogUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ed689a03197a3c7e47236ffc5e1b9763e6ee15e82bff3c200880eacc1cd66c7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PathEncoderKt.canonicalizeForPath (cognitive 17): PathEncoderKt.canonicalizeForPath has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/PathEncoder.kt"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"837ba5d3444e9858d2d3536b667adee9609b83b8187b3c92ec681ac5106b3e40"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParamsVisitor.getMethodList (cognitive 17): ParamsVisitor.getMethodList has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"343ffadcd510df2e9d3b3ba18e8dbf6b790ad8b2dc2f28d59353a7dcabe2d809"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"BuildUtil.getHttpUrl (cognitive 17): BuildUtil.getHttpUrl has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/BuildUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b88bc7bb67ce2838cbf6884fcae98f1480e9c4c795e49235d00fcf795003b8d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LogUtil.requestBody2Str (cognitive 16): LogUtil.requestBody2Str has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/LogUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9e54076c4a2129824d4b4728dcb10d3ba20b697260ba4ea3224f10b22a1f325"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: RxHttpGenerator.generateCode: MethodTooLong \u2014 generateCode runs 769 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 669 over it, 7.69\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51e5d43383593b7ac793c62fe73b0f2cea67716b6238096bc3b9942ed18199ea"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: RxHttpGenerator.generateCode: MethodTooLong \u2014 generateCode runs 695 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 595 over it, 6.95\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf3fc8ab06560da2d5eea3f598eaf957e6940225b6ef5496a24140b4e886e43e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: BaseRxHttpGenerator.generateCode: MethodTooLong \u2014 generateCode runs 202 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 102 over it, 2.02\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/BaseRxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc4be34396c1ded3519c82d0813b4990aae709862e1105a2afeb048718809659"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: RxHttpGenerator: ClassTooLong \u2014 776 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 1 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 376 over it, 1.94\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5abe531486860bb4009005cb55f3c7deb4dab6b6a08020f0e8314a1a374d180b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: BaseRxHttpGenerator.generateCode: MethodTooLong \u2014 generateCode runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/BaseRxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca9b231bfdc4e7f073c10367d5eff44c1e255088193d1d35213b51ff57b0231b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: RxHttpGenerator: ClassTooLong \u2014 705 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 2 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 305 over it, 1.76\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77f69d37f29398ea0c48fc644020a8fab4a02201683e9c7df3d2d0f0a6e5a1b9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt: FileTooLong \u2014 797 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 97% of them inside a single declaration: RxHttpGenerator (24-933). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 297 over it, 1.59\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd56f7bddd39ae6446374bc1bce01c3cdb7737f3f7b9237aa87e4576bb009b9e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ksp/RxHttpGenerator.kt: FileTooLong \u2014 735 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 96% of them inside a single declaration: RxHttpGenerator (33-902). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 235 over it, 1.47\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5307e4c0dc696ee75829d2f170e6877581a305bce1bb48b1003d287ab92b58ab"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: AbstractParam: TooManyMethods \u2014 36 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 6 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/AbstractParam.java"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd53b218c32c5c1106567211d8064ddd4a2cd00bf4aafe44f41fee0a35168a11"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ParamsVisitor.getFunList: MethodTooLong \u2014 getFunList runs 110 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 10 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"194b5d94250becd9bd9729d10926cb7e126ef81c4f99e1a2edc140d22eb04ab5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ParamsVisitor.getMethodList: MethodTooLong \u2014 getMethodList runs 104 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 4 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f82df0ccb4458edd403a6a4acbf8984e211098d50c2fbfb652c2fc480261077"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (30 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt:73-102 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/DomainVisitor.kt:80-109 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/OkClientVisitor.kt:73-102 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/DomainVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 82% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt:73\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f33f5b3a4944e2c6da7884cc5961bbaa184bdf0cdb9a26b64a70dd609b6ffb8e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:113-132 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:69-88 \u2014 \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:113\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:89\u0060 calls \u0060addOriginatingKSFile\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:133\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37ad17d9d7f3abfedf61f8e67b35a5d228cd8e3167a9a0029361348b2749d38c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:126-144 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:152-170 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpGenerator.kt:266-284 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5402b9003c05f970a13f3c0da5945f1b1a3476fcf9a7bcfd8be2d3bc5a6de83c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:66-83 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt:67-84 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/OkClientVisitor.kt:66-83 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 37 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:66\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b9bb1d71470204d0e07d81cb687aa6a31c19acc5ab1af9812c93123581d4033"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:133-147 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:90-104 \u2014 \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:133\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:89\u0060 calls \u0060addOriginatingKSFile\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:132\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc1792ecf88d1983809542c5a2bf61bcc184237b7a3a945db742a6eb80523c94"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:149-162 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:106-119 \u2014 \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:149\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:120\u0060 calls \u0060addOriginatingKSFile\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:163\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b1cb0ceff346e9a469e5fa2af9167f32e08a492f38d5595b875f34df84eb17a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:93-105 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/Ksp.kt:99-111 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:93\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"deb9db83ba9599e7ddf0293114766edb7492c915db18906856699f542806fcb8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt:79-91 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpWrapper.kt:210-222 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt:79\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpWrapper.kt:223\u0060 calls \u0060firstOrNull\u0060, \u0060add\u0060, \u0060newParameterSpec\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt:92\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ParamsVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f00717a50ac8d4f553729931e705a3c58d7e3cb3b530f0e29b019395779701a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:163-174 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt:121-132 \u2014 \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 61 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt:163\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33bea01ddb3e7fe5018f12ec342335ffbb12b0ce435692487ba79e9eacad400f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:44-51 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpWrapper.kt:55-62 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:44\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12b2ef482b7d0d41e396b6b3f40abd4f789feb2418562830eb63d0a29685ec8a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:64-71 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpWrapper.kt:76-83 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:64\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc6422c2399b3f9b074c22cc971b23c013e3e757c06c17fb7e8db2fcda99c092"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:83-90 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/RxHttpWrapper.kt:97-104 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt:83\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpWrapper.kt"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"090a020803a0f335cee2e6d15b5407c87be95e3a7493051450ba700c599a251c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:42-48 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/OkClientVisitor.kt:42-48 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/OkClientVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 44 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:42\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d34503afa63d972b036de63f60dfd8d614a734bd39c28dfc444ab47b74bb212"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/Utils.kt:112-119 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/Ksp.kt:268-275 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/Utils.kt"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29fdb239787f2b98ceb691fa8e507950a7df4555e9b73d0aa3cf93dcaaf48d96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:28-39 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt:28-39 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/OkClientVisitor.kt:28-39 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 37 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:28\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7505a976cf64b3911d355fb7febd9b314224549712d6a9f9ccae306131c6633d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt:37-48 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/DomainVisitor.kt:42-53 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/OkClientVisitor.kt:37-48 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/DomainVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 82% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt:37\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/ksp/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21b13ad56ec2d67af5164cfcbb467ce588e7bd3fb5c629a2f72484b3483c77ba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:409-418 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:419-428 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:409\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":409}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15de5375063e39ba7db64ee01d50a0596551d3ba184eb6fda95a2b3f0a0056c9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:230-238 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:251-259 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:300-308 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:321-329 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt:230\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":230}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d7e18d7af69fe7218d8beb68fdb0ab79236da07c1759ff9138dea593b2fc29e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:42-48 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt:43-49 | rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/OkClientVisitor.kt:42-48 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/DomainVisitor.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 37 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt:42\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ConverterVisitor.kt"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"592154d5babd275670013e49af638c3f0c3d101192e77c53c68f6d271f7bd69c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/entity/FileRequestBody.java:59-71 | rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/entity/UriRequestBody.java:65-77 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/entity/FileRequestBody.java:59\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/entity/FileRequestBody.java"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"441a7cb82aed518a7c11f243b49f7712684c1f0ba8f0b312e199667390f45263"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/FormParam.java:146-155 | rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/JsonArrayParam.java:145-154 | rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/JsonParam.java:109-118 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/FormParam.java"},"region":{"startLine":146}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cae860032f30a2fa2bd24d37bd8eba439d7d21d78f9e72e55aa1dbde8774c1a3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/JsonArrayParam.java:136-142 | rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/JsonParam.java:100-106 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/JsonArrayParam.java"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e0e31e3eed09923adeb534de2fe20c7449cac061b882b0e1f30b2a1b88d822c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:161-178 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:187-206 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:155-172 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:179-198 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":161}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d34574a3e55873944d0917343cef7b5d788831d851cb85fc812031e53dd6dcb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:238-256 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:263-281 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:288-306 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:312-330 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab659faa18c485df78cc6b0b6b629963f54d12da6b26a712819e7f6c34d85985"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt:48-70 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:44-66 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt:49-71 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77ca3178d7eb2877ddd3b266e87bf9af0fc0a530e3aef6c9e920405f35e6432b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt:144-160 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:146-162 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt:148-164 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1749fb9dcf05fa4c1d92c116c89512dd7e128b9fcc5696c211a87db6289c6e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:303-318 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:299-314 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:339-354 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:303\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":303}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f06cbdf8d734eb6282a3bfcbd9311a5f0cef6ca4e13d5e55d64f8438a181bb74"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:190-205 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:215-230 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:190\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":190}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ba7815bf3827ce5a0a14cdcaf6799e3213ddcc5df0f6ca8a8f809a3f308ea46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:164-178 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:192-206 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:158-172 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:184-198 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:164\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe870a3e21f771bd93707071eb686cfc02771e8f48b3b4fa5bd4b50fa5572de9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:242-256 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:267-281 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:292-306 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:316-330 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:242\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a68868c31b0666cade6f46730a84cdde3bf009801eeb7bc5429f4286a9229bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:91-103 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:90-102 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eb126612b90be46f05b1bce4ed4836f6749fbc6d2a171e7007f178f23971360"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:101-112 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt:105-115 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 68 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:101\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2420783caa9662b8c5b7a7915dbee9a7ac43aa2ff387310fe98cf279deea1de8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt:120-127 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt:118-125 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/RxJavaFragment.kt:149-156 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/FlowFragment.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/fragment/AwaitFragment.kt"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e13634a4e5100f84b15d46d7901744c1468bde11a6f6bc773dcaf474d4e5296e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt:74-81 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:70-77 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt:75-82 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:79\u0060 calls \u0060SuppressLint\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt:83\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0090f9392ff14a827797b45a35a5663cc2fd01ff9771a9ebffce925476699e04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt:131-138 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt:133-140 | app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskFlowDownloader.kt:135-142 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt\u0060 and \u0060app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskDownloader.kt\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 56 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/main/java/com/example/httpsender/vm/MultiTaskAwaitDownloader.kt"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"118cd944a3a638e21905aac412eb376edd6f3790bbe061a6555e3a3be7351fc8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //        TODO(\u0022Not yet implemented\u0022) \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"app/src/test/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/TestParser2.kt"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7120eb6fdcccc1c5b23112b09ac9928dd542af47cb7553c1df1ad7bf988e3377"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: //Replace \u0027{XXX}\u0027 in the url \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/param/AbstractParam.java"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec4e04221af889c39a9be6c563fcae926ef9e598d5e550ca6a4c4549e9bf9291"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4a55ee7bf311faa62735d37547707947e84004e7e95d0832ac27ca2d41cc1de"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"764bccaff40f21a27b884547f346f3edac746ef74d5fdc89574d3725447c2690"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8665db1d8c7b7cb94a12f7731ade8ab39b442021aea8fccdf82f5766925d519f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-295","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 79 of 82 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 79 separate risks. Counted over 82 of the 183 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpGenerator.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4099070253985fbe3fc3562f2776bdf3e41a689219b1ff7d41049d801eb374ef"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/cache/CacheManager.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"708ff854193f0c2e5768ed261dcd2bb355444e8e0889170a38358d4fe5758776"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/ClassHelper.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53cbc190899b2768e56c298e6fa58a64231fcac1d3e2d67d876cfc662a307811"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: ProtoConverter.java \u2194 XmlConverter.java: \u0060rxhttp-converter/converter-protobuf/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/ProtoConverter.java\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-converter/converter-simplexml/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/XmlConverter.java\u0060 change together 90% of the time (9 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE \u2014 the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import \u2014 and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u006030b74c28\u0060 \u5BF9\u4E8E\u83B7\u53D6\u5B57\u7B26\u4E32\u6570\u636E\uFF0C\u4E0D\u518D\u901A\u8FC7convert\u8F6C\u6362\uFF0C\u907F\u514D\u8F6C\u6362\u5F02\u5E38\u95EE\u9898 fixed #511; \u0060c0a9d79a\u0060 Revert \u0022IConverter rename to Converter\u0022; \u006001669c3a\u0060 IConverter rename to Converter \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-converter/converter-protobuf/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/ProtoConverter.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f26e823d00abd51ad7f8768ff74b3b75af3432e06653d37ef055160ad3ffdc3b"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: FastJsonConverter.java \u2192 ProtoConverter.java, XmlConverter.java, GsonConverter.java: \u0060rxhttp-converter/converter-fastjson/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/FastJsonConverter.java\u0060 changes together with 3 other files \u2014 \u0060rxhttp-converter/converter-protobuf/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/ProtoConverter.java\u0060, \u0060rxhttp-converter/converter-simplexml/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/XmlConverter.java\u0060, \u0060rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/GsonConverter.java\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-converter/converter-fastjson/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/converter/FastJsonConverter.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6b8e2cda970e2696609a1a858b51f9cb181498b2d12b510319509fd283ffd00"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling clique: HttpStatusCodeException.java, ParseException.java, LogUtil.java: 3 files \u2014 \u0060rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/exception/HttpStatusCodeException.java\u0060, \u0060rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/exception/ParseException.java\u0060, \u0060rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/utils/LogUtil.java\u0060 \u2014 all change together with no explicit dependency: a fully-connected co-change clique, not 3 separate couplings. They share one concern (thin parallel siblings over a common abstraction), so extract the shared part into ONE unit and the whole clique\u0027s coupling clears at once \u2014 you do not need to break each pair individually."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp/src/main/java/rxhttp/wrapper/exception/HttpStatusCodeException.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"937c55726038ba66e07226e211357f134c4b49cb9e38dac6d665a05c4f0126c9"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: RxHttpExtensions.kt \u2194 Utils.kt: \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt\u0060 and \u0060rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/Utils.kt\u0060 change together 55% of the time (6 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060af86f095\u0060 fix #445 \u4FEE\u590D\u89E3\u6790\u5668\u6784\u9020\u65B9\u6CD5\u6709Type\u6570\u7EC4\u6216Type\u7C7B\u578B\u53EF\u53D8\u53C2\u6570\u65F6\uFF0C\u751F\u6210\u7684toXxx\u65B9\u6CD5\u62A5\u9519\u95EE\u9898\uFF1B\u4EE3\u7801\u4F18\u5316; \u006001b7d461\u0060 fix #444 \u4FEE\u590Dkapt\u73AF\u5883\u4E0B\uFF0C\u89E3\u6790\u5668\u6784\u9020\u65B9\u6CD5\u5E26\u53EF\u53D8\u7C7B\u578B\u53C2\u6570\u65F6\uFF0C\u751F\u6210\u7684toObservableXxx\u65B9\u6CD5\u62A5\u9519\u95EE\u9898; \u0060ce7bdb2d\u0060 \u81EA\u5B9A\u4E49\u89E3\u6790\u5668\uFF0C\u5982\u679C\u6709n\u4E2A\u6CDB\u578B\uFF0C\u5219\u6709\u53C2\u6784\u9020\u65B9\u6CD5\u524Dn\u4E2A\u53C2\u6570\uFF0C\u5FC5\u987B\u8981\u662FType\u7C7B\u578B\u53C2\u6570\uFF0C\u5426\u5219\u5FFD\u7565\u8BE5\u6784\u9020\u65B9\u6CD5 \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"rxhttp-compiler/src/main/java/com/rxhttp/compiler/kapt/RxHttpExtensions.kt"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2a1937e00c9856a42ee728f11a34a10b77ff40abc58f9a9130b08ce2acfe0d9"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add spotbugs with find-sec-bugs (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-295","guid":"a706c4e2-1232-8859-ae2e-17aa2d41f8e2","name":"CWE-295","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-295"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/295.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":3,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}