# Changelog

## Score

- CAI 66 → 62 (-3.7)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.10.1 → rubric-2026.10.5) — scores are not directly comparable.

## Lenses

- Code Health 97 → 74 (-23.1)
- Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
- Maturity 59 → 54 (-4.7)
- Readiness 65 → 65 (+0.0)
- Security 88 → 88 (+0.0)

## Resolved (2)

- Ambiguous naming between getter and setter-like methods. 'configuration' returns the object, while 'configure' likely sets it. However, 'configure' is often used for block-based configuration in Ruby, whereas 'configuration' is a standard getter. The distinction is unclear without implementation details, but having both 'configure' and 'configuration' suggests a potential naming collision or unclear intent regarding mutability.
- Redundant methods for accessing the same configuration object. 'config' and 'configuration' are synonymous in this context, creating confusion for users about which to use.

## New (3)

- Ambiguous intent: 'configure' suggests a setter or initialization action, while 'configuration' suggests a getter. However, without signatures, it is unclear if 'configure' is a setter for the configuration object returned by 'configuration'. If 'configure' is a setter, it should likely be named 'set_configuration' or use the property setter pattern seen in 'Configuration.use_read_replica=' to be consistent with the Configuration class style.
- Duplicate intent: Both methods appear to retrieve the current configuration object. 'config' and 'configuration' are semantically identical in this context, creating unnecessary ambiguity for users.
- Inconsistent state management: 'reset_configuration' implies reverting to defaults, while 'configure' implies setting new values. If 'configure' can also reset to defaults, the naming is confusing. If they are distinct, the API lacks a clear pattern for state mutation vs. retrieval.