{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AX7","name":"Slice cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Slice cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX7"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"DM4","name":"Rich vs anemic domain model","shortDescription":{"text":"Rich vs anemic domain model"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM4"},{"id":"DM5","name":"Encapsulated state","shortDescription":{"text":"Encapsulated state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM5"},{"id":"DM6","name":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary","shortDescription":{"text":"Domain \u2194 infrastructure boundary"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/DM6"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SharedBloc.SharedBloc (cyclomatic 22): SharedBloc.SharedBloc has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b480acea6123d2c17727167254d25e031b6ab31a2634957ccc9b6731ce54260"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PaletteButtonWidget.build (cyclomatic 20): PaletteButtonWidget.build has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acfff03c05aeb279d2a7eedbe4924b7b4788605c1f120459c4b924d4ac1a251d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PaletteButtonWidget.build (cognitive 34): PaletteButtonWidget.build has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 16 (31 pts), boolean chains 2, if/else 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fcd9b481269b3c2cee9fa6dbb2157d76aaed59233aef58f37b71b2f72d1a595"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SharedBloc.SharedBloc (cognitive 28): SharedBloc.SharedBloc has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (27 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e17d161a3790799f1d84d116457512666876dfdcc5ba3f6e3c0721591721153"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_LabelBuilderState.build (cognitive 18): _LabelBuilderState.build has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/label_feature/presentation/widgets/label_builder.dart"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08a6b54136de0d15d5c7d62e8ca2d34471d40b5c688fee0be780491fb1ee3e29"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NoteViewState.build (cognitive 17): NoteViewState.build has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, if/else 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/screen/note_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cac76e597d53a8651c877131dbe27e8e1d4ebd093bce2b30d6bc9eba9c199c64"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: PaletteButtonWidget.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 187 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 87 over it, 1.87\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f1a0c9a8749adfdef336a6e0167ac7a0f9bcaa15907dc966e62aafa97bc747a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: NoteViewState.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 164 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 64 over it, 1.64\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/screen/note_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5b2e50158a1ada8636ab03946826c58cdaef9ff91fd51394bc81f241d4a4b87"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SettingsView.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 156 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 56 over it, 1.56\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/settings_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c6934afc65afe2457cb5d666aaa1af34c22e69b5ea49d6186ff701cc4d9ebf8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SharedBloc.SharedBloc: MethodTooLong \u2014 SharedBloc runs 147 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 47 over it, 1.47\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"777657e6ae71e79403db12e1e798a6cc7c3a8da6252cb3b9d8c1b844bc3f0b19"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: AppDrawer.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 138 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 38 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/core/widgets/app_drawer.dart"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d708001af44c99143b9c4b20520f90920d035284ac61ef8bc532b4990f2fef80"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: _LabelViewState.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 111 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 11 over it, 1.11\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02f7fcfc8d3616f4e56b0195514b270aeb0df074583daec6f0bc4eacbcc4d8bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:64-79 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:81-100 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:102-114 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:116-128 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"012a3e785a9d81e30969ce1a86bc27852ab257023accd8fd9ed086f2eab2e014"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/settings_view.dart:85-112 | lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/settings_view.dart:182-209 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/settings_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e883f84bd14434f24969fe9273a9bc3f791106b57f87d5d7135efab670c2e1bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/attach_widget.dart:91-113 | lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/threedots_widget.dart:87-109 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/attach_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e56c2b6b0b51c6a087a636bb177f1ba2ddf5db02950744f6071e37aca5a7b6a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): lib/core/config/theme_config.dart:42-62 | lib/core/config/theme_config.dart:100-120 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/core/config/theme_config.dart"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"926d21bb6e0f251ec0c87731a85bc66a7a4716e0e063181faffcd9c7e0538af9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/archive_feature/presentation/screens/archive_view.dart:70-89 | lib/features/delete_feature/presentation/screens/delete_view.dart:121-140 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/archive_feature/presentation/screens/archive_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a70dc5d5b3d67d4f94aa6fb0200cac12a7f3a8c1320b068971160cdb51049340"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart:106-118 | lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart:131-143 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfd0cff63912d81762b8d9ac447451bf1dabe87b49114b591bfe058c87fbda30"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart:194-205 | lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart:222-233 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f833978b7060d739931049ac205f3a4028b058e3333eb24385b43c3bab92241"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/attach_widget.dart:16-25 | lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/threedots_widget.dart:16-25 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/attach_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aceecd7c2e973c23cf5134d31f2ca1001aba31d0ecdf1bbf1d85dda63b68522e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart:150-157 | lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart:193-200 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff9db27f3e77093042cb5168d6b803f2daa670cd0727ebfedf9525f6478c2d06"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:65-72 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:82-89 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:103-108 | lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart:117-122 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/data/data_source/shared_local_database.dart"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80ca3970e081acf575ffdde5ca7a697f385d4883800bb8f187c353c6e805c5fe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): lib/features/archive_feature/data/repository/archive_repository_imp.dart:8-17 | lib/features/delete_feature/data/repository/deleted_repository_imp.dart:10-19 | lib/features/home_feature/data/repository/home_repository_imp.dart:11-19 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/archive_feature/data/repository/archive_repository_imp.dart"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33c5ed3ec77012c90b0869117c62dad08735810b5092a0eda98ffa0b85a750d2"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart: lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 22 in SharedBloc.SharedBloc at line 43. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 6 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/bloc/shared_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"714a6c239e5651f7b7092cdc752bdad94dff2c921d2af70aff6a82d6cce6d921"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart: lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart changed 5 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 20 in PaletteButtonWidget.build at line 14. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 3 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/note_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_section/palette_widget.dart"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62117e4d413ac6500474e888d2e36db29277d86264d765b8b5989483b20bcd4a"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart: lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days and 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 5 (its worst body is AboutView._launchURL at line 124), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix issues\u201D; \u201Cfix and refactor code\u201D; \u201Cfix locale missed part and color\u201D; \u201Cfix bugs and edit about page\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eb84828587b0c0c95f344ab9636bacada42634b6c649f0eb3beffec242761ac"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/features/home_feature/presentation/bloc/home_bloc.dart: lib/features/home_feature/presentation/bloc/home_bloc.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days and 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 5 (its worst body is HomeBloc.HomeBloc at line 18), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cmake search box and fix bugs\u201D; \u201Cfix palette bugs and complete palette section\u201D; \u201Cfix add and pin notes in home and note view\u201D; \u201Cfix bugs with archive undo in home and archive\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/home_feature/presentation/bloc/home_bloc.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/home_feature/presentation/bloc/home_bloc.dart"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e239fe8ec9f6363877f9a61791ab803970a16b645088df6c753955c92794303"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/features/draw_feature/presentation/screen/draw_view.dart: lib/features/draw_feature/presentation/screen/draw_view.dart changed 8 times in last 90 days and 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 9 (its worst body is DrawView.isDrawingEmpty at line 37), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix and refactor code\u201D; \u201Cfix back color and image in theme changing\u201D; \u201Cfix bugs and edit about page\u201D; \u201Cmake search box and fix bugs\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/draw_feature/presentation/screen/draw_view.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/draw_feature/presentation/screen/draw_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e393123893eac8bc5b64430fd5647b915e61c4a9e68433d599ee2497cf3ec15c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart: lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart changed 5 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 6 (its worst body is _LabelSelectionViewState.build at line 42), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix back color and image in theme changing\u201D; \u201Cfix bugs and edit about page\u201D; \u201Cfix bugs and make screen appbar popmenue on hover tap\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2024-07-26..2024-10-24, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272024-07-26 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --until=\u00272024-10-24 08:25:43 -07:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/label_feature/presentation/screens/label_selection.dart"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"428a01f3788545d4cd6a514c0a02777d9ec7751a4164bba6b50b204194d71d84"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: ///TODO: CHECKBOX IN NOTE \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/home_feature/presentation/widgets/bottom_navbar.dart"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb1768492854c7098481fe8516d2a3d58f11cd343630812efa1834707a88498b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //TODO: should change host from bazaar to Myket to publish in store \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bbdb7dc50b2b65a0df02760b6c00e528d1f53d2a5f951726aa963ce560894b1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //TODO: CHANGE BAZAAR TO MYKET IN PUBLISH IN EACH PLATFORM \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/features/shared_bloc/presentation/screens/about_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4275e929572a9a798e4e5aa5f635942fbcd0ac9ba8b8bfcf086bc7eada251c73"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: There are no usage examples showing how to run MindWrite or invoke its features. Add a short \u0027How to Run It\u0027 section with a minimal invocation of main() and the first feature, such as drawing a note."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: There are no setup/build instructions for installing MindWrite. Add an Install/Build section covering dependencies, pub get, and how to run the app."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 37 of 38 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 37 separate risks. Counted over 38 of the 112 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests/ separation: Tests aren\u0027t grouped in a dedicated test folder \u2014 the test surface isn\u0027t separable from production code at a glance."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"999e0c784909c76b6346a705ee63961fe363ed1cd6a94e3f80e2ebe7820ccd5d"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add the Dart analyzer\u0027s security lints plus \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}