{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R5","name":"Dependency Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R5"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Formatter.formatDateTimeFromString (cyclomatic 86): Formatter.formatDateTimeFromString has cyclomatic complexity 86 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 86 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function literals inside it that branch (lines 183, 151, 162, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2163ec55473203d92c605d54d50148ae62ccb28e9a9ba6842a577b3ce2eaf74c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"formatDateTimeFromString::tokenToString (cyclomatic 74): formatDateTimeFromString::tokenToString has cyclomatic complexity 74 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65211502bf2d4ba72484fe4a172773a0a3e94afdc8281891fdcbf73599051d3e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tokenParser.dateTimeFromMatches (cyclomatic 32): tokenParser.dateTimeFromMatches has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 16 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: tokenParser.unitForToken (cyclomatic 53) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b248080250ca7b967c4365ce145fff8311d609bc1b6ceda9b2929ea2518640d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"fromObject (cyclomatic 30): fromObject has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":804}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06b5056c3063de6ab8251176e8aa31a1b3c8706c6a1274b5b65b82a15916d235"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duration.shiftTo (cyclomatic 29): Duration.shiftTo has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":756}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec5dbcd2b7a58c64de828a1c3cc5738672d8b71fa0096bb3c52e2a4eeed44e94"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"datetime.toISOTime (cyclomatic 24): datetime.toISOTime has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbab782bdd3139c0ab56f1f5e327a0a74c85a88999ec8808332aa219a1079137"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Formatter.formatDurationFromString (cyclomatic 21): Formatter.formatDurationFromString has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 401, 379, 436). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82995a2453ef425e4e5fe9973db0918d5e3f0bc0374b1feab70e921653d26eb9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Interval.fromISO (cyclomatic 19): Interval.fromISO has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/interval.js"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6db03575b7245968eb9be5cdf748f6b4a8ace7b8fa33a09800797eed89033cd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DateTime.constructor (cyclomatic 18): DateTime.constructor has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":554}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ea67f8fa04f4e8734a787fff8cb18a11b48b2579872c5a85a919bae48780487"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duration.toISO (cyclomatic 16): Duration.toISO has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":521}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c8368a464465556c1f946ab8548bcf66b4902f531d72dfeea7cc01abf003cd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duration.shiftTo (cognitive 72): Duration.shiftTo has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (46 pts), loops 9 (21 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 42). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":756}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6ca2a4f18cb6f79ce59aa45d861163d1e795f36e6dead65893c226b9798aa9a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Formatter.formatDateTimeFromString (cognitive 39): Formatter.formatDateTimeFromString has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 19 (33 pts), if/else 3, boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 14). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 39 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 7 function literals inside it that branch (lines 183, 151, 162, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdb451ae565166b9b44f72b7bd647ed9d3b32c1aa049d6c83533437ffbc7a519"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"datetime.toISOTime (cognitive 38): datetime.toISOTime has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (33 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 17). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f40cd084da4b0be57a1bf9e8b72a8351d154740b8b08c39b582ffe3ca492aa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DateTime.fromObject (cognitive 32): DateTime.fromObject has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (13 pts), boolean chains 11, ternaries 5 (7 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":804}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51139b8d4591c0877bd444bd2307f6fb238820464a454ffb755ea8748419cf19"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Interval.fromISO (cognitive 30): Interval.fromISO has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 2 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/interval.js"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7ec90cd186ad2212c1211db8d41e87d9be78b9e08d98619d4713557452fa2f6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"constructor (cognitive 27): constructor has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (15 pts), boolean chains 8, if/else 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":554}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f1442a79bae44c51529a1d2e7ed652b799b206902d63e5fb2d0b0bf707f074c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"formatDateTimeFromString::tokenToString (cognitive 25): formatDateTimeFromString::tokenToString has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12 (24 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 12). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bef73fb811dcb1c8a5540402f54c55494f95131ba90b6019ea9bfc1be2bf265a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"english.formatRelativeTime (cognitive 21): english.formatRelativeTime has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (15 pts), boolean chains 3, match/switch 1 (2 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/english.js"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6358a4515a31744325e4439deac60b1ffec7f35f48c68ecfc8d7b2ae765ae734"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tokenForPart (cognitive 21): tokenForPart has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":245}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8092f611fcf7f2f9d70a7b082ae94b0f877d8b1e90973daa686c02b0d6493d71"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Formatter.parseFormat (cognitive 20): Formatter.parseFormat has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2efb9b70f7c22ac068d6e3f9a4a6435e835905aaba9acfcc522408489ce7a1c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tokenParser.dateTimeFromMatches (cognitive 19): tokenParser.dateTimeFromMatches has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 2). Of this number, 17 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 2 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86b6bd8d2f5bf7edbc65c4793146ccc6a43c391d6b3092cd259218767fdd8151"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"digits.parseDigits (cognitive 18): digits.parseDigits has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (11 pts), loops 2 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/digits.js"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9ccb8a963668c572fd56d2ea63794d282d56508606114347e9bc7b662349922"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"normalizeZone (cognitive 17): normalizeZone has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (11 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/zoneUtil.js"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"120ec2ee6cd7e56b72db7916ea88ff8f2656386a073d410cab39005bcb354645"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Formatter.formatDurationFromString (cognitive 16): Formatter.formatDurationFromString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), ternaries 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 401, 379, 436). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4660bfca2eeddd2ca0f69a40a363d9a5f6cd0da86b166339e9c1aa2643b47903"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"tokenParser.match (cognitive 16): tokenParser.match has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (9 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afc27afc930d17fa261b3d74fa49e56fac5f9be6987709f9b10498792610e550"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: DateTime: TooManyMethods \u2014 67 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 37 over it, 2.23\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":550}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a586b932f08a9d193073dccb5cb34f70eb7da3beebd62e8ac9cc19f85fece6c8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: src/datetime.js: FileTooLong \u2014 1037 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units), about 65% of them inside a single declaration: zoneOffsetGuessCache (528-2625). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 537 over it, 2.07\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f75be1e84f783e42f0b086e60492632c170b951b22f4e512e73ee21897ff631"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Formatter.formatDateTimeFromString: MethodTooLong \u2014 formatDateTimeFromString runs 170 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 70 over it, 1.70\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba39a193c06cce72c8540997fc4a85b2d39a14c9b92dd1f171dca8756567feba"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Interval: TooManyMethods \u2014 37 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 7 over it, 1.23\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/interval.js"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f63db92208812cbd09c4431ef6aa93b84abc064c3041e18a065087e3b2d568e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: tokenParser.unitForToken: FunctionTooLong \u2014 unitForToken runs 121 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 21 over it, 1.21\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a9c7bd46f4de53dededa69f9af7f77110b572608812a300a7ef41d9df068e51"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Duration: TooManyMethods \u2014 33 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 3 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca6b83a0d20546e444aaa21ac97cdef055d845baf10706f5829e0885b4e6a2c6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: (unnamed test): This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/helpers.js"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5303c7d25f23e5d235c953aabc133a4e6630ab5f28574af855b3d007c40fd84d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: (unnamed test): This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/helpers.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8653caa34b10c1fd80d501991bca2d405a309b4557e4c1091b64b3f38825324"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: (unnamed test): This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/helpers.js"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bd852b9e6000fdbfe7bd9ace3ced9f751636c17d50b3bb234337b8f01060cc2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"error","message":{"text":"No assertions (empty test): DateTime.fromFormat() parses offsets: Test method has an empty body \u2014 it asserts nothing and exercises no code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/datetime/tokenParse.test.js"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecd5d098f862c748bf22887c244c03790fc3eeb2521e248747ecadf4a4f75dd6"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"error","message":{"text":"Assertions commented out: DateTime#toFormat(\u0027ttt\u0027) returns a medium time representation: The test body contains commented-out assertion calls and no live one \u2014 it runs, verifies nothing, and still passes. Restore the assertions or delete the test; a green test that checks nothing is worse than an absent one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/datetime/toFormat.test.js"},"region":{"startLine":400}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00d0ae291f5ef7a484c7913231dfd5ce849574fc03c6b299ccb5f2b232d30fee"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"error","message":{"text":"Assertions commented out: DateTime#toFormat(\u0027TTT\u0027) returns a medium time representation: The test body contains commented-out assertion calls and no live one \u2014 it runs, verifies nothing, and still passes. Restore the assertions or delete the test; a green test that checks nothing is worse than an absent one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/datetime/toFormat.test.js"},"region":{"startLine":408}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"672c2f82d38b0b71067b2b8c13af58a9694c7b4fce3ecac2ba6599adc4d6bce8"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 1 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: tasks/build.js. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0be54ea182b6c9c6b6bc6e78d28b634dd6c106b9bfeec77dd15314e7a5a465a7"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 1 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (2 single-owned of 18 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 18 of the 33 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #2 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: hard to navigate: The tour reads as one long paragraph with no section headings, so an overview and a list of features are not visibly present. Add a short heading (e.g. \u0027What is Luxon?\u0027) above the tour to demarcate the scope."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/tour.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b34c6b75ad2623791e6e42223289294b662d8616600dd9e076ccc9fd7704832a"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no architecture or design documentation: The tour does not describe the architecture or design of the DateTime API, despite an outline that lists it. Add a short architectural description (e.g. why immutable types and explicit options are used) in the tour."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/tour.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9980cbef5f0b75878ed7a6c5b7a41574f9331f535644ba7108136ada3cbb2810"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no architecture or design documentation: Upgrading is described without referencing any architecture or design docs, so readers cannot tell how the breaking changes relate to the API. Link upgrading to a short architecture/design doc that maps each change to its source."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/upgrading.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dce83ff4f274729788ee8f8a016e21bf91bef38c414069e850e13ef6825661ba"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b923d2a6d4bf9f3d17a069114b8d29dce8e6bc49ce4ae2931de0efd9a515de40"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"904b3f333838d97fde9dc807fd4560c10f8371b02ab76c0e403975727509d022"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fadfa9d8bbb17bdd0bd45d7076738c4a1c98f37f240a6f5da8114dc95db48d9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1651527fcff7213da991a35665cbf6cf1708d5350636e4e5058d3a3134c8df65"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"938e0adc771a83e015b710c8fd5c90b20e21df15cdb4f858ef2b1b24c718dfa6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"994ba912da969254c416b6b5724b51f381092d3e28a9dddb00fb16f3be194136"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"3.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e683fbb87c344083c445574472465d6d07b15c1723d780ccc92e69183d54242"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"5.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcbee3d3d1688ddf64fc84fd368a5d0dab19aaae0bd732e27a0239445036084e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"js-yaml","version":"3.14.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14f6e25400f56c5461532fada26752371d69d4991a866112a50eed21dff47ad7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"js-yaml","version":"4.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2e781aeeb54d3ae845ae518d9f9b4fabc9ce4afb31ec2d5eceab2c30473e850"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"nanoid","version":"3.3.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21560844dc61e02941c913fc155d72c06158b13dc45a2e8a7a351293f668662f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"1.1.11","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb042b6beb9b1d7184b07656bdd3060e0ae1df1c9ef7f6300c41874f563a4f5c"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"2.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad53a12c94605cc22e87a0af4a24ea3150a77033c8a67d366ebab792c9957802"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"cross-spawn","version":"7.0.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1e03b14734319d875bd0dac1f97ef300c97b23c9a470ff6af28213112e543c4"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"postcss","version":"8.4.31","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"384a0892f51a77ce6e1097a5154e203805ee2ad75d30693634ca5b796c0008c6"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"browserslist","version":"4.21.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e02f053898a35c81dd3976f70f76fbfb4f273ee92432eacacd848db60698976"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"picomatch","version":"2.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5163547957c66bdf78eec5792bba6ddf14d66ba30a16d2b008813acd0c80adb7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/plugin-transform-modules-systemjs","version":"7.20.11","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a647c0ac29883f2f7fe1b69a65db4a6d2f74057cefcf30323990f9efe26642fe"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"rollup","version":"2.79.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"tasks/build.js","line":1}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e8a38a547fbcb36d40d6b636f424331ac3f99faa67fed9e3f9e36364c737971"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"braces","version":"3.0.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce9074a8ca02728fcc1d03753ea9d91376f00dae795aa598fd65fddb2b7fb34d"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"lodash","version":"4.17.21","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87839f7289af0999d94a99db6eefa4a0c9cb8f6ea36e8599abd5bd35ced532c8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"serialize-javascript","version":"4.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecb1107154e802ec55ca85cdbe70d70a0d97d489f92c05a139296378c387cde9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"yaml","version":"2.2.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98645b36f3d8a19e1462b10ae8d23a6853b810993981c4fc4065e762fff2771b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"qs","version":"6.11.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82ff8cfb7d777eeee1cd9352fbb505b09f68adf4548c033e1348fd45932882eb"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"micromatch","version":"4.0.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ecd6ca3eb8b2572343d599f76674c19123a7b125523b0d5ca7accd1822d70fb7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/helpers","version":"7.20.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23c7e5d47e6b24503b3609811628f98453c5f1448c5751383c5edea381f57f0f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/runtime","version":"7.20.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4ab27a9e1ec6441e9f5a5fb0755c44a2713204023b6addd7e8425483a67a05e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"vue-template-compiler","version":"2.7.14","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edf4d2ba0c3c16c39a04d4e44c3e05b5264474d398fa15c76dc3a48285c90202"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"follow-redirects","version":"1.15.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c93c9e9a7508d1bb1d419bfe67a538fbd81572ddc053c684d546cff31ca78570"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"uuid","version":"8.3.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d7c8846e5c2786ac6f200262a5ae377f0a0f36f03fcc336f877638db9b57f15"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/core","version":"7.20.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"test-or-tooling","file":"package.json"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2c2f7815bc2e3dc5c624dff5f3eb708691c4121a9eb5e23a9fac3c97c7d6a20"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"diff","version":"5.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04929f1ea59675c09d63a1854e58e18d3ca321f453dfef4be8fafa30fb75cd78"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@tootallnate/once","version":"1.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"456d2c3f511799653c765ed1632fec68481d07b1aa9db4d76a6f5dab8c714fd8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 7 of 18 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 18 of the 33 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: src/info.js, src/impl/conversions.js, src/impl/english.js, src/settings.js, benchmarks/datetime.js, src/impl/diff.js, benchmarks/info.js. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s javascript-typescript pack, \u0060semgrep --config=p/javascript\u0060, or eslint-plugin-security as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 818 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"PF3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Sync-over-async blocking: \u0060buildLibrary\u0060 is async and calls readFileSync, writeFileSync \u2014 a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop \u2014 every other request waits for as long as it runs."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tasks/build.js"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b3e9c2852a86e9304a7202ae5fb7ed6a4e448224a3fd03875b6a81427110e7f"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 88 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are src/datetime.js, src/duration.js, src/errors.js, src/impl/conversions.js, src/impl/diff.js, src/impl/digits.js (\u002B82 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (18 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/zones/IANAZone.js:139 \u00B7 src/zones/systemZone.js:19 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 75 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/zones/IANAZone.js"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9953bc3244ba1715b82a61a52c25f8015ad88d1d2bed475acc7a70f980426819"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/datetime.js:818 \u00B7 src/datetime.js:1661 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":818}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02414c168a2dd5986468a0f3508a20b6caaacb52ea9604627d2473e83a6ff9e2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3 locations): src/datetime.js:1112 \u00B7 src/duration.js:1017 \u00B7 src/interval.js:224 \u2014 the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2668bfa3c404c2e9e4c4f65eb71e0e67bb87dd2723ce7678f229588e0336e14e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/impl/english.js:42 \u00B7 src/impl/english.js:73 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/english.js"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b9d30f2aaf29fdee3cbc9ef52309dcf29b13609aca194c3b3ed6a8efd813248"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/duration.js:945 \u00B7 src/duration.js:977 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":945}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5720dc19ad84553b0e17a19d5bb6758272abb9b1d7ff62a8f5d9c7a707f73a50"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/datetime.js:1344 \u00B7 src/datetime.js:1364 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1344}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ffcfc3f2c73e65602f7ababfe6af2b4405e9e3494d1fd7baf6032c094254b0e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/duration.js:836 \u00B7 src/duration.js:866 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":836}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eefa5accab9c8335603556b8631e6092850b638985b248c688e24044e1382d79"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3 locations): src/impl/formatter.js:239 \u00B7 src/impl/formatter.js:290 \u00B7 src/impl/formatter.js:310 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c49ec00177015df86dc29ab4ec7d0bcbde7430eee198398120c73b15588846d0"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2 locations): src/impl/regexParser.js:243 \u00B7 src/impl/regexParser.js:249 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/regexParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9679eab1dc573b7364a838b24b4f83ed7775a76f28295164b3b94049a6a9d6e"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function tokenToString (cyclomatic 74, cognitive 25): tokenToString has cyclomatic complexity 74 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"274b9344de6cd293e8a8b239188a53870d9135dbc840dc85a527b244d5007c97"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function fromObject (cyclomatic 30, cognitive 31): fromObject has cyclomatic complexity 30 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":804}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"381a9d25037f9413088f0667117c8d7f73a468c97e5dbdff19f7d85c175b5255"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function shiftTo (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 72): shiftTo has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 72; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":756}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cc059a4d7e3a9e4541dbff8d28b17d70889da03a74b69d0b725c1a07e0531e7"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function toISOTime (cyclomatic 24, cognitive 38): toISOTime has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 38; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":239}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9904517907c00d3b6d9709e2cbfdb028c74d357f78f3951ae968eb9d4173f97"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function fromISO (cyclomatic 19, cognitive 30): fromISO has cyclomatic complexity 19 and cognitive complexity 30; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/interval.js"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1b84d96e47e5b3b2b65b2b4061d30778676c6e3a694fa65702a369fd2e0dd46"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function constructor (cyclomatic 18, cognitive 27): constructor has cyclomatic complexity 18 and cognitive complexity 27; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":554}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"262ae1255bdeaa392763069333cb409f8d78cf4898e065c87e28b12d85f3e241"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function dateTimeFromMatches (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 17): dateTimeFromMatches has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a37b10cb5e46ec106df521e05cbc00edf6277904f06a52906643990a761283ec"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function toISO (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 15): toISO has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/duration.js"},"region":{"startLine":521}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98d402817652b7592c7dce2b96239a01ad1ff12363a0e5f46ffb2193006e33a8"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function formatRelativeTime (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 19): formatRelativeTime has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/english.js"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0b01494b9ae04988aa49c9dad554944fd0243f87affa794c18d09709321e2b1"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function normalizeZone (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 17): normalizeZone has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/zoneUtil.js"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db958d19ac9b82f0c5b7b474a95e4e21bd448db818057bf8f769b3467dea7a5f"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function set (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 15): set has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 15; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1652}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65d9ae2538d7c5f27beb45eaa32c0c185212e12aa62857fd2cc41da05fa71f1f"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function startOf (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 10): startOf has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 10; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1744}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12830ec0cacbc89e4a74667114b034e688f609f4d4fc1d29463f8fd467ae0be5"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function tokenForPart (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 21): tokenForPart has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/tokenParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":245}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"542d4c8b92f175f3891710d1dcd10c06f91998c085f95f5c8cdf105d754cb5a9"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function parseFormat (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 20): parseFormat has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9dd82ee72e3f798b189494c6d8d7500aab51ca4fc28a66ad72a440aaa7380c1"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 13): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 13; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/impl/formatter.js"},"region":{"startLine":401}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43f9a8f61319b454e45564c3f60593aaaed425b412f7de4242b578bc0db07bf3"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Large Files: 6 file(s) over 400 lines (counted as significant lines \u2014 blank lines excluded \u2014 over production source only, tests excluded), largest first: src/datetime.js (2406), src/duration.js (983), src/interval.js (629), src/impl/locale.js (499), src/impl/tokenParser.js (459), src/impl/formatter.js (424)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cecee31b569df4f07e06db732f1ca037af27b5afef9023da51f9673d931a142f"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test reaches this file: No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL \u2014 if neither does, no test reaches this one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tasks/build.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71c48dfe1a5a64abe6698877fc4f55286b7c520281809a5340ae69dc65c05c9b"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test reaches this file: No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL \u2014 if neither does, no test reaches this one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tasks/buildAll.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54196de9ccb106695314d4dad4926da2a86ca99a0997f2366b98037ce9d435fb"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test reaches this file: No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL \u2014 if neither does, no test reaches this one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tasks/buildGlobal.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510d78461af3b6c0f70e72434ced2d6cb498f7be95e1509fd981167e218e4e1c"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test reaches this file: No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL \u2014 if neither does, no test reaches this one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tasks/buildNode.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adef105f2850b590b8b05609be2eb7c9fe29c3b4949338b5d454257d3abd7b74"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No typecheck script: test \u2713 \u00B7 lint \u2713 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"912edc7f1fd20bf80ef68c3293e3048565115e48707dc5f9d492201598794658"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): src/datetime.js \u2192 src/duration.js \u2192 src/datetime.js (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 17 files)"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/datetime.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9470190c11dbd740394a5bae734332df4b73e6b25c28e8183ccdf62b3828c93"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"CWE-1104","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1104"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"CWE-1329","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1329"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":35,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}