{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WinUIBackend.applyActions (cyclomatic 29): WinUIBackend.applyActions has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1889}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4fcf8d98f1b6248ce80baf0c967c16a0bf8785c7d30647c2f321b0021dff54e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkCodeGen.generateClass (cyclomatic 24): GtkCodeGen.generateClass has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f569dd5888b599c3157a0949afb97f8e4d132fda309d1cf938c4c2c850ca1d32"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Locale.windowsCurrent (cyclomatic 20): Locale.windowsCurrent has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WindowsLocale.swift"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"813eda06a3d3c2c059e94781a52b609440738824283f2e925b2a0f97aa8bfcd2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Gtk3Backend.renderPathActions (cyclomatic 17): Gtk3Backend.renderPathActions has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"190b2e3ca0ce39cfc098921e387f99e6a3f460744c3cf1f2cf283e8b32156278"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkBackend.renderPathActions (cyclomatic 17): GtkBackend.renderPathActions has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66074b97b9f1e3b7588727f32ce5e37caf2e5b82119e8d624514f5ee6cb7fd12"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ScrollView.computeLayout (cyclomatic 17): ScrollView.computeLayout has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ScrollView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74ea41a9158977c11e6a98688e2e040bf1b91eda9d22b5ab43670cb22eb633f2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Analyzer.analyze (cyclomatic 16): Analyzer.analyze has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac3d207c63313cee56f2accceab36b43ef9c43ed15dc51917f47039ab6691fbc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AppKitBackend.applyActions (cyclomatic 16): AppKitBackend.applyActions has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fd2a6dc5c053c83f119ac58343b2a88c4c82ae607de205e700f9a278cfa1581"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SecondaryClickListener.onTouch (cyclomatic 16): SecondaryClickListener.onTouch has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/Kotlin/SecondaryClickListener.kt"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1231369171e719fdd576e950972d5b2e2b8288451218a97cbe4288fc23ac04a6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WinUIBackend.applyActions (cognitive 53): WinUIBackend.applyActions has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (41 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 3 (5 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift holds 2 of the 22 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 58 of the 144 points over it (40%), 2.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift at 20). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1889}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"553be97a9a5e5ea6b630e1876abd52a7b347fd62210f881f7e35286715518b75"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WinUIBackend.updatePicker (cognitive 35): WinUIBackend.updatePicker has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (21 pts), if/else 9 (14 pts) (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift holds 2 of the 22 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 58 of the 144 points over it (40%), 2.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift at 20). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e72083f125a7e9be1a82635cbadf8f26569517e76ddfbee9bc53614ad226b039"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkCodeGen.generateClass (cognitive 32): GtkCodeGen.generateClass has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (19 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 6 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"922167d8a4e756bda16126ed57dc7675fedf7d19d9402fd44588675cd2682e03"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Analyzer.analyze (cognitive 24): Analyzer.analyze has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (13 pts), loops 6 (7 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1479f33df2f8bf26eb74bdd57bc853555fb122d455e8ecdc13a64afa9f853907"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ForEach.computeLayout (cognitive 22): ForEach.computeLayout has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ForEach.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"704484e64ed7d3c060785dc1dd8df8efd5cac8dc86f62a8e36109f7ba92e860c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TimePicker.update (cognitive 21): TimePicker.update has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (18 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TimePicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c2b70e423592d83434da2aee28833b15d771c389f50c6646e413ba808d03aaa"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UIKitBackend.setPresentationDetents (cognitive 21): UIKitBackend.setPresentationDetents has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), match/switch 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BSheet.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72b2a9357f36c413e8edeaa30df32881c6b6f15e052ef167394d9c64ccd30278"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ScrollView.computeLayout (cognitive 20): ScrollView.computeLayout has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11, boolean chains 6, ternaries 2, loops 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ScrollView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec12d86aeeff29acf7db98c1e4973692070781645a2bf6bf87c1aa99498462d8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SecondaryClickListener.onTouch (cognitive 20): SecondaryClickListener.onTouch has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), match/switch 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/Kotlin/SecondaryClickListener.kt"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7373f62d86dc795504e6c4c3d54887866e0ddf6a36d6d078c289cc837ad425f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Gtk3Backend.renderPathActions (cognitive 19): Gtk3Backend.renderPathActions has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), match/switch 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f51c1a403a31b907ced76c6d835499cb7a13252e749a9b4636f09e8bd0c753c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkBackend.renderPathActions (cognitive 19): GtkBackend.renderPathActions has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), match/switch 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cb5762d86345c096ad2ba683fd2532bff15ee4293c56bedf43dba9a6bc1be6c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AppKitBackend.updatePicker (cognitive 18): AppKitBackend.updatePicker has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 4 (10 pts), if/else 5 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Pickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ec9e4fce1077176832fd9b020d438310dadfd833d543e19d1ea63c5905c9b12"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AppKitBackend.setSize (cognitive 18): AppKitBackend.setSize has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Widgets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88b6805d77722ce8f581d3eb88b16acc38dfb47630b56496e5364c6032ecc016"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Image.computeLayout (cognitive 18): Image.computeLayout has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Image.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ef3e31184688a967ee090e36b9f4b95f5ee8b85b10fb317ca8826fa072d9a01"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AndroidBackend.apply (cognitive 17): AndroidBackend.apply has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BPaths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04a3140d4eeaf852d03fb53dfb17eee963ddeb5a4b7380ca9c421de0e36eab5a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AppKitBackend.applyActions (cognitive 17): AppKitBackend.applyActions has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac4997632ad4b18fe0735a51358e7a7d905462a9b1259849a76389a219994308"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkCodeGen.generateSources (cognitive 17): GtkCodeGen.generateSources has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28244aea5be697fa64ad0caafe813e14802d2f59f3eab8af3a506d538ca94f95"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewGraphSnapshotter.match (cognitive 17): ViewGraphSnapshotter.match has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), loops 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/ViewGraph/ViewGraphSnapshotter.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c324a9ad2744f43f8d209b63578a34823d24bca1f0772261576187894ab13fd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CastBackendMacro.expansion (cognitive 17): CastBackendMacro.expansion has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (15 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/CastBackendMacro.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3538a80054b1ccca0ce0168dfb5c5bbfb8677f5e8d8de228e77f8c6d97e75abe"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EntryMacro.ensureValidApplication (cognitive 17): EntryMacro.ensureValidApplication has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/EntryMacro.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6143e4fc95dd4a622d8e20065c08a8441b0476424452b02a561897239996e684"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FocusStateManager.observeValue (cognitive 16): FocusStateManager.observeValue has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/FocusStateManager.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0e5df81706e6933350b84b4e362a56ad68ae41b5407629ee95cfdfd53a389ce"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GtkCodeGen.convertCamelCasingToSnake (cognitive 16): GtkCodeGen.convertCamelCasingToSnake has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), loops 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":919}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6b1664317bef54a030ef286378c8ac51827f2bfd66dad0fe03b61c955f0b6e5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: AppKitBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 151 methods, declared across 48 files: Features/CoreWindowing.swift (13), Features/SelectableListViews.swift (7), Features/TextViews.swift (7), Features/GenericContainers.swift (6), \u002B44 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 121 over it, 5.03\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/AppKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c0d2418197ca3188bb133e5e328d3e963a8f6c157df744353e6150199fbb51c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: GtkBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 142 methods, declared across 43 files: Features/CoreWindowing.swift (15), Features/SelectableListViews.swift (7), Features/Core.swift (6), Features/GenericContainers.swift (6), \u002B39 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 112 over it, 4.73\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e5cdd0a50c04658eb9b153093766a4cf3395eb5d26b6342d0edca67549d127d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: UIKitBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 141 methods, declared across 19 files: UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift (31), UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BContainer.swift (16), UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift (15), UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BWindow.swift (12), \u002B15 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 111 over it, 4.70\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5d441b711931b802a3b0695ff81a81c7e23bd7a39008fcd873db79eb077bf82"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: WinUIBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 141 methods, declared across 9 files: WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift (107), WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BTextField.swift (8), WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BButton.swift (5), WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BSheets.swift (5), \u002B5 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 111 over it, 4.70\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"357eeb0e9416c27cba6df93371c626c5b144f50047084905c127613a0e9edcf7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: AndroidBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 136 methods, declared across 24 files: AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift (41), AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BTextFields.swift (13), AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BToggles.swift (10), AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BList.swift (7), \u002B20 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 106 over it, 4.53\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d2e7913ede9d7212d80f781de6ba165fd203a6be0a50cdab1298115425000cc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Gtk3Backend: TooManyMethods \u2014 131 methods, declared across 39 files: Features/CoreWindowing.swift (14), Features/Core.swift (7), Features/SelectableListViews.swift (7), Features/GenericContainers.swift (6), \u002B35 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 101 over it, 4.37\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8b883168c0a62a52e8e222b2167a1c3e483a0e06f2112b3923d7dc7a4a37807"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 1679 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 76% of them inside a single declaration: WinUIBackend (89-2193). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1179 over it, 3.36\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fab450a4c96a717bb400f1b981cab100783351a1101922c96c4e9b352b736d5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: DummyBackend: TooManyMethods \u2014 100 methods, declared across 28 files: Features/CoreWindowing.swift (13), Features/SelectableListViews.swift (7), DummyBackend/UnimplementedFeatures.swift (7), Features/GenericContainers.swift (6), \u002B24 more file(s). The bar is 30 methods; this is 70 over it, 3.33\u00D7 the bar. That list is where to read them, not a suggestion to split the file: the members belong to the type wherever they are declared, so moving them between files leaves the count unchanged. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a160ebdfb2ba272a04a5767ebae9ce5ad86e0e68634b7bb06ed538e23c58bb8a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: WinUIBackend: ClassTooLong \u2014 1281 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 141 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 881 over it, 3.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8b2c37bdc8bbed49c8f85347a942564b7a066b276009bad1e0b25cd2e56f124"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: RoundedRectangle.path: MethodTooLong \u2014 path runs 306 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 206 over it, 3.06\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f78ddc4497b363abc6b17e8d666e094526e77950ca8857c3c4e62c2ff0a4d37"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: BaseStubs: TooManyMethods \u2014 81 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 51 over it, 2.70\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Backend/BackendFeatures/BaseStubs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13816bf06ef22832f583003ffdd45bda2f5b23a1752640a1b5f2e19a0118d36c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: GtkCodeGen: ClassTooLong \u2014 638 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 22 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 238 over it, 1.60\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"520626904c4950c7bee47729df51bc57f0ae78baceb0bd1b320ef31bc50616f7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 646 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 99% of them inside a single declaration: GtkCodeGen (12-993). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 146 over it, 1.29\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"344f6f00c84bdb3b66c978f8a5ef796297e81ddc1fae2fdf1acaa6cb02220be2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: WinUIBackend.applyActions: MethodTooLong \u2014 applyActions runs 126 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 26 over it, 1.26\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1889}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afeb9e5a59d033ec161744c0414e53fd1ce06c4d2fc9f59380798f94a3c22e28"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: LayoutSystem: ClassTooLong \u2014 469 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 15 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 69 over it, 1.17\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d72003d17326b3909cfa153f4bbe9ebdbd51c169462d7e6879275b5ef8a4ca68"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: WindowReference.update: MethodTooLong \u2014 update runs 106 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 6 over it, 1.06\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowReference.swift"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b77f04605162dad902f0c966cdf9f154bbac986a7a26da1b15e220a1368e85c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: GtkCodeGen.generateClass: MethodTooLong \u2014 generateClass runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":381}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5451161f5778d11b170ae888622edd283edac47b6418d8524c9ca84d23ebfb23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member family (3 members, 28 shared lines): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:18-47 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:17-46 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:5-50 \u2014 These 3 members are variants of one another: a block of 28 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 3 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10f8a20ed0102c481de7941467ed997826ecee6799a34804434913daf15c266c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (80 shared lines): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:9-112 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:12-137 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 80 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0172c66020dbf60a3763d4096298075720818c692487546a3e942fe03d58ee66"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift:50-62 | Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift:59-71 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift:108-120 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift:115-127 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96af6ac6e1b2aeee543925e63b2c0baa2e663cfa43253bf980091ea1b4265bd0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:17-26 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:27-36 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:44-53 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:28-37 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d0ed9f2ac93969459921f4d50e3ac1a1ad1b5fe734066d16f1f962d68895e8c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (102 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift:109-210 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift:105-206 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 92% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift:106\u0060 calls \u0060queueDraw\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift:102\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8f99bdaf1e0902b2db974566b851f912a5ca1227e08b96dd35b3d15dde503a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (79 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:19-97 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:19-97 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 111 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"466e0a6ddfc86ba5d18aff6782821ec561347ef36b57d7221c8f3b7def65f419"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (61 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift:44-104 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift:42-102 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 92% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift:44\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift:106\u0060 calls \u0060queueDraw\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Paths.swift:103\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1479539fa9df060f2aba1236046972923c77c68111b49d2ab5588519fb2df398"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (49\u201353 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift:64-112 | Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift:73-125 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift:64\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8f16999f9bbb87c33143b6022b66c3ed26aba46a6e699e4c31446619c14c00c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (38\u201339 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:41-78 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:41-79 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 86% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:41\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1f9edbe313c28ce3b4334bd40ceaeec5f6dc04b80a07376abb00c7c5e3f8dc6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/RevealFiles.swift:7-42 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/RevealFiles.swift:7-42 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/RevealFiles.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/RevealFiles.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/RevealFiles.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1104d918324a8ad90907331c5c2704f1792bfe87917660bd6d8775577c98e2c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33\u201336 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift:288-320 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift:587-622 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift:288\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift"},"region":{"startLine":288}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd854879e1dd60e0480c0cb1c8c6585a0a69902c41e14edd2aec96a5d0f3da81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/Shape.swift:92-125 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/StyledShape.swift:71-104 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/Shape.swift:92\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/Shape.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b2f5ce5cf8395dbc2dd23962bc98bd11c9fcd97cb2b79b3e973826dd94c1177"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SecureField.swift:51-78 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/TextField.swift:110-137 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SecureField.swift:51\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SecureField.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a826cf6726a6c5d2cb9a97b5875f39881c5f15cbcf0e1e49de42702eaf638294"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidViewRepresentable.swift:66-88 | Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidxFragmentRepresentable.swift:82-104 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidxFragmentRepresentable.swift:76\u0060 calls \u0060getView\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidViewRepresentable.swift:65\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidViewRepresentable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9064a64e494cf1abd4c334f2ea7aa5aaa59b8e2f597d543613d98501abb5c8c4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift:66-88 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift:89-111 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift:66\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95b9a48d47890b1a2ab6e141eefc478fcd1a02d84c2483105e4c34fbeebfc3d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Paths.swift:68-89 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BPath.swift:26-47 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Paths.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"564c418bd01ea615cfdb8a2c05500b23265a0fc1ef3ff76d29921cbb0562d957"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Alerts.swift:31-52 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Alerts.swift:36-57 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Alerts.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ccb9ad2487c5f39ac49e9eda2babf47c0b0a75b06252cb7e94ec9da0c513ada"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21\u201322 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:58-78 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:115-136 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:58\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a75f6fbf97e2f2e30dae6ef307dc6cfd33d3bc94e2a1c32ff6b10e212e5f0641"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/LinearGradientView.swift:10-30 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/RadialGradientView.swift:8-28 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/LinearGradientView.swift:10\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/LinearGradientView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"302d99ef7554f4811c963b9af4520e24fa4abcb5ed816a0b7e5fbf91330fc7b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift:568-588 | Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift:665-679 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":568}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b551119a132cbadaf125e5b7e2f86adacd2cbda4e36b8fb93532c7ad6fdaefed"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:74-91 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:166-186 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:74\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6718640e07e8c536dea92505b544644cf4daaa5fe4c08366620008155c49def"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:99-118 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:99-118 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 111 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e840557d2f9425685db21b371834ed02292dd793b0f3c3fe7f772543704977d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextFields.swift:10-29 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/TextFields.swift:10-29 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextFields.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65aa0e7226f1261fef6732d608b740c65692c716418e84021378099d9fd001e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkBackend/Features/LinearGradients.swift:40-59 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/RadialGradients.swift:40-59 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/LinearGradients.swift:40\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/LinearGradients.swift"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ab2257bed6842822ec9652f5c48b1d3268a08fe6ac84bee66cf83f2c024b30b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:9-27 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:12-30 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:9\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31a193b1c30b10c8ef4ac23a72dd01b481cbc0a9a08b21da3e5cf443a95a2c48"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift:66-83 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift:93-111 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift:66\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a31465c5ed1bed6f4779b49e7373b5af7376bdf31ea60eb8caf633b7efa1a4fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift:87-103 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift:113-130 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift:87\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e09a7444afacc79bd8b553abd4e6118a17325a01e57e15db4e187a5e91c9e0d0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:91-108 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:116-133 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a0e3a0a91edfa73c82fb663bacfc9bb6a8987ef6e11d8594786dad9f4c6556b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:93-108 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:344-361 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:93\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b5c9dccb5313b87338ab860f9320bfbc28b8714a6e99015449939426fc0b29b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:31-47 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift:31-47 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:31\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee9c94da239e52ba5da0c7c5dfec99bce85d34b000aadff8ba3cdf6e9acca5fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift:98-114 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift:100-116 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 42 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db745774df0b93f8ab7665277864d83fa271bb982b0ddf3e9a9d27746b467351"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sliders.swift:12-28 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sliders.swift:12-28 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sliders.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eac466a53c402568a4eb9961a2c45373ffded98aa30675433aeb77640bd809d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift:81-97 | Sources/GtkBackend/GtkWidgetRepresentable.swift:80-96 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift:81\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note first that the copies are not typed on the same thing: the declarations holding them bind \u0060gtkWidget\u0060 to \u0060Gtk3WidgetType\u0060 in one and \u0060GtkWidgetType\u0060 in another, and the duplicated lines use it. The extracted unit therefore needs a parameter type that fits BOTH \u2014 their common supertype where they have one, or a new abstraction over them where they do not \u2014 and settling that is the step that comes BEFORE the extraction above. Where the two types are deliberately unrelated, the duplication is the price of that separation and the honest resolution is to record the decision rather than to extract."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12b76c702cae0738beab8fb3edc83f24ba46e216a75c1b58e29c1c055ac72231"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201317 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:58-74 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:42-56 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:58\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ed02ac1ced284be3528e481fb53b704fe48800cf813bde270424366d5a83085"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BGradients.swift:15-30 | Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BGradients.swift:58-73 | Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BGradients.swift:103-118 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BGradients.swift:15\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BGradients.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f6d304d0336bde44ddb7b5122e8e5e45163aa7abb2926ab5cf038e6fc2448aa9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:35-50 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextEditors.swift:32-47 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift:35-50 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:35\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbbf38a972a6bd76fa03f534755cc3e3f05a36a216c57223d555881520168c27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextViews.swift:32-47 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/TextViews.swift:72-87 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextViews.swift:32\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"489b58484720fd5c3f5f7c6f407485df01b02e2412fb3d02424c20d9cbcdf8d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift:367-382 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift:444-459 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":367}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46e487e14528f2aa14feddd4fed85cd3cb76839241ab555bd3615c2c398b1f5c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201315 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ProgressView.swift:215-227 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SecureField.swift:26-40 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/TextField.swift:85-99 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ProgressView.swift:215\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ProgressView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"920455c457abd6dd7ac7a439878f9c29fddf17c3e9b16c8a2256cec03e883a97"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:7-21 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:7-20 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 86% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift:7\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ef45fac81fe874862838b0324f0394853d68bace49a5a09544ff8efd7baf1e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:31-45 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:41-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:31\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43c4f27951c0817e44b9952ed6a97d21d1012fc58bfca05bc3cff7dce0b9b849"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:55-67 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:68-81 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:91-104 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:55\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e69f42821b8348f4957f5618649f47e6d31a1b951f886b3297502651aaa4c8d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift:56-69 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift:55-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 42 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift:56\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c062ffd5f423aec770e57c1afb5290bc1ab2384471878aef896189f5200ffe88"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:189-202 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:203-216 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:189\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17c412289a8593b124ec2998468d2b0d8c0c97eec33abbb64d0a4406ccdba7bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:278-291 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:292-305 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:278\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"645154152ee712647e548b1426c3eec4a71b5b230971fa426ebd0a80225c5bd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:364-377 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:378-391 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:364\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":364}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ebfaa9155ed4b4870f9a37c58bf2102fc79acd4aa62e0140223cef27f294faf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:439-452 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:453-466 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:439\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":439}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd513dd8051d5b857e7854d5a82b4533855f2eff7f48a896e2c8c4f4e3e3284c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift:50-62 | Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift:59-71 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift:108-120 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift:115-127 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27b197e74a9b8b174bf59db9ce54e9c32c6c3349ee95ccc2e0684d8e1b31bd67"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/HoverGestures.swift:16-28 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TapGestures.swift:16-28 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/HoverGestures.swift:16\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/HoverGestures.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6888caa1b2d56c9df41fbc3815fa3b4692b899eed32c9996e0997ece4354c03d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ColorPickers.swift:10-22 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ColorPickers.swift:10-22 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ColorPickers.swift:10\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ColorPickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f1796db9cd68c885a80679434ea3712c535fdaa4feeee688fe675a12f9f7311"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift:71-81 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift:48-60 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de412067da3b2023ffd3d3f4d313fcc025c1f444bb8a0545ee63b30eb8d9bf27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:29-41 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:32-44 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc7eb9bcd2e32e0953da5eee368828c10f8b84f5d2e1e8db3c8adc800f652686"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201312 lines \u00D7 6): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:18-27 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:38-40 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:17-26 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:37-39 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:5-16 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:35-39 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 3 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:18\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:15\u0060 calls \u0060set\u0060, \u0060CSSProperty\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:14\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78cf56d45d085f4b8739924bfb0680ae376f00867c90160f44a417fca7dd3352"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileOpenDialogs.swift:7-18 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/FileOpenDialogs.swift:7-19 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileOpenDialogs.swift:7\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/FileOpenDialogs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb944c3af66d4b5e368ec5ac2fc2a8e8fe1cd386dfabcd05c86f8a18ea761d73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:44-55 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:47-58 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:44\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0832c3962f246fbd84e30d084b2010638de59dbffad7e1e86548843230dee373"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:53-64 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:77-88 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:53\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"453d0fad12161d3f77ded9431d060a207023dc7cdd341ef5c14f84a2b2bb12df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:76-87 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:100-111 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:76\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee4f9a23a1690e3c02c83d7759f21be411ef5e8d0aa907579c48900fc5dbf144"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift:81-91 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift:83-93 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Sheets.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 42 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Sheets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1454c2ee255e8179afdb669d69b8040aa0350c2cfcb73a2fc5daccf3427d02e6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SplitViews.swift:36-46 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/SplitViews.swift:35-45 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SplitViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd863f88be15471e4baef1305a179d92dc55b94955ab036138e5a5609b31e66e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:16-26 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:16-26 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b54dd055d80cdd29ad806d4c9a5c9da4d827e4d49a03725c881c7d06901633ee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:56-66 | Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:72-82 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:56\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cea2b24c8d7509b4dd3bbdaa2316c48345ae5034e6537b0cfd2a3b090d10a0e1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:59-69 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:75-85 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:59\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkExample/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af40fa64ea0e17882e7892bcaf4d1d353d0b8b61eb7f1db127bcdcb97630e06c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:89-96 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:262-272 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:89\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87b680a6b8527701b5c2156ce5b61c6e14a136587c4b42c248d8ece0fe40af75"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:58-68 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:81-91 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:58\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4331a7c14b0116a0ea3db664a8230231989087cbac9a9f61ef77020d4512836f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:17-26 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:27-36 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:44-53 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:28-37 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f45adfd6e351998d1ad6b2f79175c27d438e402a31bf2c323e1bf074ecfcc0d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:28-37 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:38-47 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:55-68 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift:39-49 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift:28\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46b5526b7eb28e159b65573383d4d372f065efaf54e2aaf913850b2ba70e59c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:60-68 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:63-71 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:60\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73b04fd77da7fa3f3eb8f75ae12cbaa6652600a79de1850bb2b284a3726d3f09"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:76-84 | Sources/GtkExample/main.swift:79-87 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkExample/main.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 80 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift:76\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7fee833a721363c72a9addd243786bf7e3d9e392eca36161494dcaf201aedfe"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:49-57 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift:71-80 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift:49\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4c78bd8ac8f8ee5d33c0a7a4a6301f79c5699aa4ce8b72e40fbf387258ea767"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/FocusableModifier.swift:56-64 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnHoverModifier.swift:56-64 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/FocusableModifier.swift:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/FocusableModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"875bf456e8ecebffe4fbe5bde9f7587a5f17d710a6649928e1ae3cc39c085b18"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/HelpModifier.swift:56-64 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Style/CornerRadiusModifier.swift:55-63 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/HelpModifier.swift:56\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/HelpModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6dc7c85ce5f7c910fc84cb6c01f27572ff660661f014d04c98047a899c3be39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:178-186 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:348-356 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:178\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc148c832b59107bb56f65067125a6299f44302e33a1ccf53ddc243020cff24a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:131-139 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:145-153 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:157-161 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:131\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:157\u0060 calls \u0060SIMD2\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:131\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07b957d674f768f5b32514a9591095a8cd5e1fd875e849545d602eff6c76e203"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:220-228 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:234-242 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:246-250 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:220\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:246\u0060 calls \u0060SIMD2\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:220\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df4834496c909fa48e7451d96f10f11a219c63f50c9549ba44f967b9418e7555"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:309-317 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:323-331 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:335-339 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:309\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:335\u0060 calls \u0060SIMD2\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:309\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ef01ac92d8b9f786d8497e5bb56450aa7fd50a5ae61ad737821d7fa71691d15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20139 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:395-403 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:409-417 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:421-425 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:395\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:421\u0060 calls \u0060SIMD2\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift:395\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/RoundedRectangle.swift"},"region":{"startLine":395}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e5701b414d8c720cbb7e0906f89dec33ab0c4a1c885dd7dd14762507436224a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BGradient.swift:22-30 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BGradient.swift:58-66 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49050ba72090ae462ce04097cb4c686e03f29a060ce7cfea1996077239d50269"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20138 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:32-37 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:31-36 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:26-33 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 3 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:32\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fae5e4ba293669ed56cf013c51d21c39b25605add6fb6bd2a3fcee57b1a346b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextEditors.swift:18-25 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/TextEditors.swift:18-25 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextEditors.swift:18\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/TextEditors.swift:30\u0060 calls \u0060withBlockedSignal\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextEditors.swift:29\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/TextEditors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f996ec5e9bf781a380010c3ec970c54da51e3995694d248be5b9de68a92b524c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u20136 lines \u00D7 6): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:29-31 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:42-47 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:28-30 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift:41-46 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:20-24 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BColor.swift:43-50 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Colors.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 3 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift:29\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Colors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b6efa216af8955a7896306050fcf347e2688b3d1f67e801187b5e52a4b8e270"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Widgets.swift:19-24 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Widgets.swift:19-24 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Widgets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d262d0b98508e612e00ef59f5d802f140a142baf24a7a4dea38d168a66e83693"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift:94-99 | Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift:127-132 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df801f0b332f9645a703c35e32afd6edd76b23c12cdd785c6f86502426463c9d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift:25-29 | APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift:32-36 | APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift:38-42 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift:25\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"932c8791cb332060faef88266a30ecfee75d224b3ce65970ea960e97ed3e3dd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSObservableSecureTextField.swift:4-22 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSObservableTextField.swift:4-22 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSObservableSecureTextField.swift:4\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSObservableSecureTextField.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08a614c4cdf7774be9cc31b13153b3a40a10eeb26b0a3016f7dcd7673fc0078f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CornerRadius.swift:8-14 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CornerRadius.swift:6-12 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CornerRadius.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fb6e1c241f14a185a9b661f23daed0ec958c369785988adc39f92e719cd95b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SecureFields.swift:6-34 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:6-34 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SecureFields.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 84% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SecureFields.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7666107d3524a08b6aad06cdedc874e5ac49a7779dd003509e0743193fdc8197"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Tooltips.swift:6-13 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Tooltips.swift:6-13 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Tooltips.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"723fd87b7e9b0c55bc74ecbdeaca18184389c9afbec046325101290285129a2c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/CustomColorButton.swift:7-33 | Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/CustomColorButton.swift:8-23 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/CustomColorButton.swift:7\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/CustomColorButton.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3230833f4dc526fd7746b8afe81e6d68d59257c95ba94868b323a28e07dd70df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/LinearGradients.swift:9-18 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:9-18 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/LinearGradients.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed9f0bad155c0f5e7e82eb7bd7601eb0703683c4b740870857509bedc1cfaf2d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/RadialGradients.swift:9-18 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:24-33 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/RadialGradients.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96f358fcb774e20584adece5786cfa54f8c2c788d1b00c775ae998bcf6491958"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SelectableListViews.swift:41-47 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BList.swift:24-30 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SelectableListViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3315efa32584a6faddd3552ba3b78e3362ed9538f8f9e176d44ab8e616e02b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:28-33 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:28-33 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a8a9803386fd9fa9f6df7f367521e98d9baa80f0a1d2bba1220a67127a008ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/Conversions.swift:7-12 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BGradient.swift:212-217 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/Conversions.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13d61d69b9c270f5e3d345f22378bd61032181e9c581288e712dc0e21a9afd3d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/CustomWKWebView.swift:11-18 | Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BWebView.swift:37-44 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/CustomWKWebView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cc4f7a4f89d833f905428fa3dae361c1bbba1c832aa4a46b4904ccad1f886aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift:45-53 | Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift:81-89 | Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift:65-73 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cae00866e99947df76ef8f5477545acabca6985ecd4b7b2e67ac85a22ab69d3e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Alerts.swift:19-29 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Alerts.swift:24-34 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Alerts.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b115b617998497ff645d12be6215dddec862a32dd279bd7fc0b0340bb9adf43c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:6-17 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift:6-17 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 111 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ApplicationMenus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec7db122ee17eec379e054dec531aaaaeabbfa7704c7316947a1b673df27898e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift:127-139 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift:128-140 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fb6957d9410454d13e2e9eceb1455d8b15dc89ef4fc2ce3a412d779e84158e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/GenericContainers.swift:20-28 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/GenericContainers.swift:20-28 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/GenericContainers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c61cb103410aadc3515072bcd1a12d6ee0609206175d15839bb562c44f9aa630"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/GenericContainers.swift:35-39 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/GenericContainers.swift:35-39 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/GenericContainers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"480d306eea07a9f604fe1d89a01611064d8f72c3e53ebe94fb680e942b5a5ed7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/IncomingURLs.swift:7-13 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/IncomingURLs.swift:7-13 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/IncomingURLs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2af4c185933db2dc91a77e015437f8ee2e9b5856e67ba22486048b7aea4a5198"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/PopoverMenus.swift:42-52 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/PopoverMenus.swift:62-72 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/PopoverMenus.swift"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"190130112c9823769b286d65af72e3aec47b2bb5095297e893cd0bbcdfd915f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ScrollContainers.swift:14-27 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ScrollContainers.swift:14-27 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ScrollContainers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43ddbd9919c59362b93683d9596add5f8e218992c4a06cd473dfbda082a9a3bb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SplitViews.swift:21-29 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/SplitViews.swift:20-28 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/SplitViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d27519fcb443a7ef7c3c8bdb8d96fd76186b57877072cf3878a47fa15c14c541"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift:6-19 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift:6-19 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbc043cb69c3e35bbc3e64a5bb3af06bdb8bdde6dbe3f6a1ca681428e18fe8f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowClosing.swift:21-29 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/WindowClosing.swift:10-18 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowClosing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcd5e5381ea32e744e6f73d6aec5d003f8df853c6254030d37b55b1f16dbffbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift:34-40 | Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift:41-47 \u2014 \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbf6d0eb6a00362924f8e981d0f94ed8d17fa826330d1b1797243cd5ced44859"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift:7-11 | Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift:7-11 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 88% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c072d34cd2c3363f937f20334e191a36ca3df8eff0748b4de49b67428190c036"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift:33-40 | Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift:33-40 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 88% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1de45e79af824f52ebd7bc5ec682021d4e3027357b3a54c3c9001d602815ba1c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift:106-113 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift:551-559 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb82ea787b7c7da3a1621af51ccd6c95d57aebcaf5f323ab5acc1d3519e18c3e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Environment/EnvironmentValues.swift:228-232 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/ViewLayoutResult.swift:60-64 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/ViewGraph/PreferenceValues.swift:60-64 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Environment/EnvironmentValues.swift"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d5ff3352b473d294985ec3b2a13ee4906b98d791776ecf8e15695f60cdfe61c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/AlertScene.swift:50-59 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/Window.swift:67-76 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowGroup.swift:80-89 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/AlertScene.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96c1ed4101d9fe887aeb9195d5fbe874f27c9dadfde1fc60178f5d1a25670db5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/CommandMenu.swift:13-17 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Menu.swift:18-22 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/CommandMenu.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d7167432647a3092e940365d9fec531a08047944b00ba8f53d7f0ca0f8d79bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/Cancellable.swift:45-51 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/Publisher.swift:63-69 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/Cancellable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42669694788d211effae892fa91961995bcf8bfec4323d7270973d219f337e46"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift:52-61 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/LinearGradient.swift:34-43 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift:38-47 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15d8b749c93df8cfd9c7cdb86cc56f774de2b2498f36b97323f59f80a24d1187"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/AlertModifier.swift:61-66 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/SheetModifier.swift:62-67 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/AlertModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a70144baefe708395bba30e6f2b356fd024bffe796f75482534617e65c1f2b7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 5): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/FocusableModifier.swift:16-26 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnHoverModifier.swift:21-31 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnTapGestureModifier.swift:55-65 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/HelpModifier.swift:21-31 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Style/CornerRadiusModifier.swift:15-21 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 5 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/FocusableModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8d2e826383a91ac19acac0f20ad4c50441d1f209e7adb3be0c29677845b6e9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnHoverModifier.swift:41-53 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnTapGestureModifier.swift:75-87 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/HelpModifier.swift:41-53 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnHoverModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db6387c2df4257551725549cc323285adca6f1911648b9701c10d4e8061bf140"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 5): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/AspectRatioModifier.swift:50-56 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FixedSizeModifier.swift:43-49 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:122-128 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:223-229 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/PaddingModifier.swift:104-110 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 4 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/AspectRatioModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7351cfe7410bf908d2e1f7dd7ae444c3d2e967fb97d445f9f55d07bb1a94e8f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FixedSizeModifier.swift:51-58 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:130-137 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FrameModifier.swift:231-238 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/PaddingModifier.swift:112-119 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/FixedSizeModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f076c006e7b4bcee20037cd0c0012c59946358df84e8bf1e1ee25603c518beb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Lifecycle/OnAppearModifier.swift:20-26 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Lifecycle/OnCommitModifier.swift:15-21 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Lifecycle/OnAppearModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9684ea60c63a7573907c7d1a19b656ffd5715bc5c0a72071e08284868032f65"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/Shape.swift:80-90 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/StyledShape.swift:59-69 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Shapes/Shape.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a66c515d8e4c3ec6190d7a2ce278bfa9706026dcdbb471328f4cd328dc41baff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift:5-12 | Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift:5-12 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextFields.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 41 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SecureFields.swift"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd5c34ed5885d07cdccb236fc31de7af696ae61d3822d5db6c05e8437e937290"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/AppKitBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:6-10 | Sources/UIKitBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:6-10 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e950bdcfc192e49ceb69b34bd3c3bc49ce02efd8a02f14a3fea069505db073df"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Checkboxes.swift:10-20 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Checkboxes.swift:10-20 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Checkboxes.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07c782b2e549ba2c45288d405036b3c54ab9861f47b84f02c0f868f6a8f34aa7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:6-14 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift:6-14 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/ViewLabelButtons.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af65b3bcca043d773db3d918a82e4eba08e97c102b6d3ae6120e11eddfc7c152"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:6-10 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:6-10 | Sources/WinUIBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:6-10 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a51f080af8314f11afd1a820f26932e07cfe5fc3f197f0663a417eec00fd6fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 24): Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:14-19 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:23-28 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:32-37 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:41-46 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:50-55 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:59-64 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:68-73 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:100-105 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:109-114 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:118-123 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:127-132 | Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift:136-141 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:14-19 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:23-28 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:32-37 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:41-46 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:60-65 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:69-74 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:78-83 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:110-115 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:119-124 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:128-133 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:137-142 | Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift:146-151 \u2014 there are 24 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 24 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f62658b1f5fe60035dc017e617f852a0fe61e47ef9b36508e2e739fb12fda466"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Checkboxes.swift:22-28 | Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ToggleButtons.swift:28-34 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/ToggleButtons.swift:22\u0060 calls \u0060clear\u0060, \u0060set\u0060, \u0060cssProperties\u0060 and \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Checkboxes.swift:19\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Checkboxes.swift"},"region":{"startLine":22}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"032fac670a606f43cf9964c22e67e8503deeaacff62fa32238cea242690e0192"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/Modifiers/SceneEnvironmentModifier.swift:7-14 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/EnvironmentModifier.swift:63-69 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/Modifiers/SceneEnvironmentModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2881bea4e0834a6e038ed3696c139615dab429acd7b2c47d0c6cfb678bf2a51f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/AnyView.swift:35-42 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Style/CornerRadiusModifier.swift:31-36 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/AnyView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"221531aa81024b71209647c9297ea13cb7cc2248f660630d96fa3c2cf4f0aa27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/AnyView.swift:128-140 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HotReloadableView.swift:126-138 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/AnyView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f737e1c41b4771a6ed4f08a250696dce5bfa1923e757b86c16c2ae2290789e5b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/GeometryReader.swift:45-53 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/OptionalView.swift:38-43 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/GeometryReader.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce4ba7fdbdb1e78296e325524450d6761db32f6eba66900bdde6be1f9e3268aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift:33-43 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift:19-29 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b00d987747800002d28d1236be53342919a9f69676f155f0b106c17ba2a00a15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift:45-50 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/LinearGradient.swift:27-32 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift:31-36 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"150dc22b3d332b9df18a5441416ce4620e88d379ff2edefc6862c365fe9141a9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift:108-120 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift:83-95 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":108}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ace00475b3209538a0beb93f89415f1f13036ace106d773e77662193f74d18a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift:125-137 | Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift:68-80 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/RadialGradient.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 53 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Gradients/AngularGradient.swift"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eb133d16140e4e20f4612c20ec3b675d2bc8aed8bb831f0ac9ba4c23309367a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift:1921-1925 | Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift:1933-1937 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also register a scope-exit action (a \u0060defer\u0060-style statement) that runs when the function holding them returns: moved into a called unit it would run when THAT unit returns instead \u2014 before the caller uses what it releases \u2014 so keep the registration at the call site and extract only the work around it, or have the extracted unit hand the resource back for the caller to register."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1921}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f91afefc893aaedfe6d255039f251b41ffd337a15e68b2ad799e32aef8370ad5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/Sources/AdvancedCustomizationExample/AdvancedCustomizationApp.swift:158-168 | Examples/Sources/AdvancedCustomizationExample/AdvancedCustomizationApp.swift:182-192 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/AdvancedCustomizationExample/AdvancedCustomizationApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b628ec623f0b6a65e71c8b63bf259de67fc5b243cc099f6f077abefee61dfcd7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/Sources/SplitExample/SplitApp.swift:78-87 | Examples/Sources/SplitExample/SplitApp.swift:98-107 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Examples/Sources/SplitExample/SplitApp.swift:78\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/SplitExample/SplitApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1f63c06cfb9eeb713be63de350aafe5daf9848bdde06a460dbbebc2b0573160"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Examples/Sources/NotesExample/NotesApp.swift:11-18 | Examples/Sources/SplitExample/SplitApp.swift:140-147 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/NotesExample/NotesApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f469ab63655a698d9f74aadeb88dee61881f64301aadea032f56103557656269"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: AppKitBackend (LCOM4 130): AppKitBackend\u0027s methods fall into 130 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 130 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/AppKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d22af6ba52d660d0b66d42113d41f94fc7563da568ec8aa7df8d92a782b175f2"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UIKitBackend (LCOM4 118): UIKitBackend\u0027s methods fall into 118 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 118 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0724b5e38bde2dce555a2b6f50401c44544cb96ee3579bffe52243aeb4066491"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Gtk3Backend (LCOM4 100): Gtk3Backend\u0027s methods fall into 100 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 100 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7fe0f47de6eeed1570a4a7c41cf7c6c93de6e292025a08571e8612e0a5610ee"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: GtkBackend (LCOM4 97): GtkBackend\u0027s methods fall into 97 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 97 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dc14a00f9af09f2f6cc5fb002bfd8a7213334c56dafa4951a5a9b4f9ba91a53"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: WinUIBackend (LCOM4 93): WinUIBackend\u0027s methods fall into 93 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 93 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd2831054dfef250b9115c4d32d5e3a11949bc6ca2b4328552598372b239b33a"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: DummyBackend (LCOM4 91): DummyBackend\u0027s methods fall into 91 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 91 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7896e115e88dbcc3414879410dde6485f42772403a976cf2c5ec1a2da9f57a40"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: AndroidBackend (LCOM4 88): AndroidBackend\u0027s methods fall into 88 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 88 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81b86894a6501784fc19b36aaf90e871984f0cc3d16308f7847638bf78d35240"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: CursesBackend (LCOM4 16): CursesBackend\u0027s methods fall into 16 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 16 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b397b4e85830f20c0808bb351c4dbc719d3dc23e73f1d1e0b4b8aaf8995ad8c2"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: LVGLBackend (LCOM4 14): LVGLBackend\u0027s methods fall into 14 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 14 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c1a609b4db5343bf7abb5a3711452cf35d119d36714bc6eed01b20f383b4884"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: NSCustomButton (LCOM4 9): NSCustomButton\u0027s methods fall into 9 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 9 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSCustomButton.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"823d1aa10d701749f73c3afc6e2b0ef64a6be96458077f1b6430427182a15c1b"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: NSCustomWindow (LCOM4 6): NSCustomWindow\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSCustomWindow.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"256bc1dad2559301e8ad16049f6c9f846c0feddf763562c45969c7445d29f005"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: AnyViewGraphNode (LCOM4 6): AnyViewGraphNode\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/ViewGraph/AnyViewGraphNode.swift"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3676cb9bdd10cd8dc0f31dda2c188f6ef395f8d6531db26986351d7eef6362eb"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: SceneDelegate (LCOM4 6): SceneDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66434b89870b8bdf4e19ff8b32dc3d3426b2a4f0f537c8052b3868da428192b6"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: NSCustomTableViewDelegate (LCOM4 5): NSCustomTableViewDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSCustomTableViewDelegate.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a8049f22b8fa3d0ca54888f174a48d73f258c1c243e36bc39134ea2dd8428b"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UICustomTableViewDelegate (LCOM4 5): UICustomTableViewDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BList.swift"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0698507af20e5d6fbd7412cd4a4461837cbcaf9c00ca921f61022f30f8b0195"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UIPickerViewPicker (LCOM4 5): UIPickerViewPicker\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BPicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e844712f3ca258ad7c773bf020ec8043751e524059e65a4251877ad24b618bfd"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Delegate (LCOM4 4): Delegate\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Helpers/NSCustomWindow.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74df4f3f81ccbefe104f7b30cc42e6cd57e02ce753a05a005bcb3edbbec868ea"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UITableViewPicker (LCOM4 4): UITableViewPicker\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BPicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa37a2bc32041911e38597fd104d68db91c11cb8d6fb933a89fb9a12332392b9"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UISegmentedControlPicker (LCOM4 4): UISegmentedControlPicker\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BPicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b740f8bebb13b750b3f3b33673ee244899c7eb0722dc8fbdc61649014f16554"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: ApplicationDelegate (LCOM4 4): ApplicationDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":307}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c95096e7aedc74a573a253e2208f2e18d9c4e4b4373dcfd00a02458334f5212"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"Inverted test pyramid: Most tests are end-to-end, which tends to be brittle and slow."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fc0c6fc621cd18b83a2d2c03ea6976b61fb4769f62dc21043f0af4cad912d10"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEntryGeneratesWithLiteral: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57c7527124e348d7cfa8a4d691e357ab7347c9f6480645577e05a9dd327dcf24"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testGeneratesWithTypeAnnotation: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e45f66f69e0fd1f24d00e1594e3790a24a10f6eb731b5d3e016139c6265bdf3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: entryThrowsWithoutInitialValue: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":75}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee27a05928f54c22108fb4986dfa16d60c4bf7cdb295843e072de580fc31dcfa"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: entryGeneratesDefaultValueNilWithoutInitialValueOnOptionalTypeDefinition: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2760825d23ccd32545cf2383215d45ed46745e6d21ab52a8a8e1102c352e1c9"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: entryGeneratesForAppStorage: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"051086c30fd4815de1c468ed780cfafd789ed00415b2ab60cd0ee73f4fdafc46"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: entryOnValueWithoutDirectParentSupportedValuesExtensionFails: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":194}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93b27f8297664247b586461a5b946875e16414486c33c3db54b596c730428fb3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: entryFailsWhenAppliedToLet: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"165855db27a05d72b8f9ee9e581432f2802c7b2186ec91a9bec69d826008bdd2"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: duplicateIds: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ForEachTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aebb4d06b051bce55ac8adf0e7a84b7c97ba06b2559f72b3ac5715f02b649263"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testStoredPropertyGetsAttribute: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c12442059be77241f1d58a49fcc96b0783cc4602ccbed0217ff9da87df9f3dd"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testComputedPropertyIsIgnored: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bf80b6d2185d0ee3e6e326b9d75223921ba20c21218a239760f267e7f890425"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testPropertyWithObserversGetsAttribute: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d80538a90850821dfd15b75bf04321668cdc5f7b341265b9ddae1632943aa40"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testPrivateAndStaticAreIgnored: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be79beffdf568114b38cfa8a44770fdf0c94ddfb6aa2caa243e9886aa577ad57"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testObservationIgnoredIsHonored: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97688417dbabc29a836b3020aea39954bfaa630d5a049086ecdf6b9e68ffa25a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testMultipleBindingsThrowError: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5e64a8e10a3d8d9ff8de46a5d9ea21f0ba5208e2cb259d259347519c423526b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: namespacedObservationIgnoredBlocksApplication: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/ObservableObjectMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4ef4b4fac2bfa1e0041c1f5e45dd371082e392d3884ec46ff2a91bd46a6737d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testVStack: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/Layout/StackContextRendersDifferently.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2db91c886b056fab423cc2feb09d223c6e819c9dfb153565731042a67914dc0d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testHStack: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/Layout/StackContextRendersDifferently.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a326d8a96a406796535789b1c26a40110cd4cb749f451f58a3ad8414af1bed33"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testZStack: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/Layout/StackContextRendersDifferently.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8531b66b1de15d6b6a73a418e79697043c10b7fe4bc41ce8d6eb428b31fddefe"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dependency not covered by the committed resolution: androidkit: \u0060androidkit\u0060 is declared in Package.swift but has no entry in the committed \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 beside it, so its version is resolved rather than pinned. Resolve the package and commit the updated \u0060Package.resolved\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24a9dc8fff7ee93a780d3b109dee9fedfbd0240a222ac3e81ce84c19304eaaaf"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dependency not covered by the committed resolution: swift-java: \u0060swift-java\u0060 is declared in Package.swift but has no entry in the committed \u0060Package.resolved\u0060 beside it, so its version is resolved rather than pinned. Resolve the package and commit the updated \u0060Package.resolved\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53e749e079bca128b802e45dcb91e1c6cb26345327c668fe58c3d7f9102813b6"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BLocale.swift: Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BLocale.swift changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 20 in AndroidBackend.getCurrentCalendarAndLocale at line 39. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-06-23..2026-09-21, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-06-23 11:34:05 \u002B10:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-09-21 11:34:05 \u002B10:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BLocale.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BLocale.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"861d97f13033453ef75dda40f7d6ecbfad122ff1d290b1ff48d27e2f55c3a6a5"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 14 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend\u002BButton.swift, APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/HotReloading/HotReloadableAppMacro.swift, Sources/WinUIBackend/InstancingHelpers.swift, APITool/Sources/APITool/Context.swift, APITool/Sources/APITool/StubGenerator.swift, APITool/Sources/APITool/Differ.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Backend/BackendFeatures/Core/Core.swift (\u002B6 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cd1b483a91bc3555b827a9747caa5a8c1aac7204442f8e8cee37afc1c13e124"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2: If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 10 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BLocale.swift, Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BMenu.swift, Sources/WinUIBackend/WindowsLocale.swift, Sources/AndroidBackend/ActivityDelegate.swift, Benchmarks/LayoutPerformanceBenchmark/EnvironmentHeavyView.swift, Sources/AndroidBackend/Kotlin/datepickers/DateButton.kt, Sources/AndroidBackend/Kotlin/AlertFragment.kt, Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BToggles.swift (\u002B2 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9377f3716ed9b8de5d170a03181b9d089205fad1f770b1ab4670db4a6327bd3f"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 2 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (27 single-owned of 262 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 262 of the 798 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #3 (2 file(s)), anonymized user #4 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above. The files folded here: Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/ForEachField.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Backend/ResolvedMenu.swift, Sources/Gtk3Example/main.swift."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Add test for raw identifiers after SwiftSyntax version bump to 602.0.0\u002B \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/EntryMacroTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19a3f7fa5500e52be2a4ce08a2a5e19a6c3d7a1e01187655b9fc21a408d9e73b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Create mock backend so that this can be tested on all platforms. There\u0027s \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/SwiftCrossUITests/PublisherTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2f3b20003d864cd58265914683adddd2695f238b3dae7bbc501ed88d6c9593f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Figure out how to fix autoreleasepool crash that \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Tests/Gtk3BackendTests/LayoutTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b5a1a75919203b057719e15524bb6cebb2d22c0851279c87050148273d7b3d0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Repair Picker.inspect implementations post PickerStyle refactor \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be9f4262258a41c84ab44cf72713a9ad44b80090168d3f4a9b7f3d4f6cc7855b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Repair Picker.inspect implementations post PickerStyle refactor \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b433d9bbeee4123c1c4d7dd284dc77e28723efb7a2f6839c0357fefbd667e2c3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Repair Picker.inspect implementations post PickerStyle refactor \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cc41f44c0e8c7f0e506897de145673d8c3cdb74e203aeb846a7aa21cf09d506"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Repair Picker.inspect implementations post PickerStyle refactor \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/InspectionModifiers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e18d5ca9a5503ad1ae213c02472c75df271cb340e8e66ae224856bbeb356cb74"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Read in previously hardcoded values from the application\u0027s \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49f2fc2c9c3e774db4cc0142ee0701b4d0a17d59a604a79d4e554af0b5cf1f36"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Detect whether window is fullscreen \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d44a0cc15aa4c7935fea09eba5c900eaf36579e9984b3bbf483e7faa264e66ca"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Detect whether window is fullscreen \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"659cd1aa954a66c0fa6fc91a3a8b407f26b376339fa6a9ea6af268fea742b21e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Detect whether window is fullscreen \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb5e4a534f6a65e54ec55eb4e756067d1c874d5994a3aee90e536fff63ec0b98"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Compute window scale factor (easy enough, but we would also have to keep \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":555}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cbffceff0fd23564fe462089029da045350456ddd33bacb8de5e0c5361d807d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Notify when window scale factor changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":565}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce3e58c6db33799750a05ebd0c0a3e005196bf947ea40b24b6aacf21876f9eb3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Notify when window scale factor changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e7e24a3dd3b63dbedcd41d7804a195298c7051a0078552e336f347cec4150b5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Notify when window scale factor changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":119}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ab06cd3e3a9862c8dbc0b16a730c932900bba22b4b288b145d395453d259d98"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Find out if there\u0027s an efficient way to do this without WinUI \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":623}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae3a3bc2e6e49ad7f310ddda3671a2c09373fa882e06c7744cdea7fb1cd09829"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Look into removing the container, like on AppKit \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":866}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20b03e7d78fa100899c3e5c37f70f572216f6c63c89ded91940735532816c685"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Font design handling (monospace vs normal) \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":945}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e595b0d99ebc650a1c1caad928dfc6bac407439753e1ffd773e62337fb0ceac6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Understands how to get ComboBox items in WinUI \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1250}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24e4bd5929f39d1cde69f7839efa9118e43cd6b8eea31d3011e1df595781b8bc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Proper picker updating logic \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8a51bf68d65eb4cccf0b7d8afefa553ef462c847e2ca4e84fb0f5d611c73790"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Picker font handling \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1278}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b075a3d56b1e9c931ac7835197a6f9fc21ad40faece6e67f4f570097e6c5964"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(parity): foreground color ignored \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":2144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ec31551abf2ab4edd2d7bd8fafd38be45de759229b77271f1174663c52717c4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: localization? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"727d47d207ab05156fa1acea46994c5c3b0056305ea9c328beef5eba2a7b9f01"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Replace with .accent \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BCustomButton.swift"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"836b42363fa858cd5d3a81c872c626c08fb418a2331d85210a2dc20d9f449881"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(#235): Respect fileDialogOptions.allowedContentTypes and fileDialogOptions.allowOtherContentTypes"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BFilePicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0101a74d2cc94fd0cc09b603942a0af1d84a85d0a4c12a969a58f2033e9b165f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out if there\u0027s a way to compute this more directly. At \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BList.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fb251dbf4cac5ccdca36cd7aa4183b94694e08fc62319ea1b16e3892afbbe36"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out if there\u0027s a way to compute this more directly. At \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/SelectableListViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c934006f706d912ce719377fbfb96d79081d31ef4a56b614832927edf553d072"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Maybe we can backport the detent behaviour? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BSheet.swift"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8185c0e439e57eb8c6225d1e6a78395087b6bbeebbeee7827d58b2436081841c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Support preferredColorScheme \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BWindow.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ac8f259a98d9d9db1eb44e580a8fd3142d8d519e7c33aa2b2bd4247fbc15013"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Support preferredColorScheme \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dca03eef7e4ca93f027b4235f5232072ffd21635ecd4a4a501458f183c5454ab"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Support preferredColorScheme \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf704c8072fda51a56dae07165f506efd52d316e7cc300f29414f7c444e8b88c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: When tables are supported, update these \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c25499a32465997b325e5a671701d427af8794ad94a4cd12e805c086242323c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Record window scale factor in here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"321b0abf436f7ce228eb2e11f5277f804063cf975c143a096f03d28355565edc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Record window scale factor in here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54a8d82cb7622af9c2fe23eeffc9e8daa3dd23a965412eb8d548bac1e2aea9e8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Skip nested declarations \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/HotReloading/HotReloadableAppMacro.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b088dc9c5ecea1a1fe8ba541b7860682ff53f787fd19a2c1a2c9a10ca4f273a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Guard against use of \u0060#hotReloadable\u0060 in situations where \u0060self\u0060 doesn\u0027t refer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/HotReloading/HotReloadableExprMacro.swift"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45cc2b48292ef8b943beaa8aa492e4e6db090f43b22ac1a001cf6808bee76376"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This could possibly be renamed to \u0060\u0060SceneGraph\u0060\u0060 now that that\u0027s basically the role \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/_App.swift"},"region":{"startLine":3}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2910209d1dbfe0c3681ddd0d8b3645908f2b344e45c88408cde664297d7f97e1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Do we have to update dynamic properties on state changes? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/_App.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b15ccdc148222ddf361bdb6f6b3ec75f2b426d9fa4052d6d3432dacd9f3bbe95"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out a convention for views like this where \u0060\u0060layoutableChildren\u0060\u0060 will \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/AnyView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072bb152dda9285ead1c1e37203e5a003665f33b559a64756adc8fc94e12dbff"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Figure out a better fallback for non-text buttons in menus \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Button.swift"},"region":{"startLine":143}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b216a21e8891bcce3a5c779b2a6443440a98a70927240797c045867a8237954"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Ensure that this is valid in all circumstances. It should be, given that \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"134ed31bafd39c001f5960f4cb2f8eff21c426042342694ab8dfc644fd0f81ac"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: We should be able to reuse unused widgets in newly created nodes. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ForEach.swift"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c7dbc6d525ab237997f1253d194f421bb6289bcd8c467074454e8b82f9c9414"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This pattern of erasing by wrapping in a temporary class seems \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ForEach.swift"},"region":{"startLine":369}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5188a8d8ed0a6f91c6cb969f2b91c1aa8dbbb689a22b8467f607878c445e36a9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Propagate these errors somewhere. Maybe even just as trace \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Image.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"967ac69117edc5f4951d4ee78e921594800c758e3454e17b16b6664a4fd00f72"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement snapshotting \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/List.swift"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbc2aa0c11fcc05575dbfbf0a5a185458b55058cbc0fafd602faa6a4c27dfe69"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Look into ways to predict a button\u0027s natural size without \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Menu.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f24e83c2e3b5d9f274cbf1fd8f53219af16f000421c1eedb9cd9fbd80157617a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Investigate why the following is needed. It may point us to \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Menu.swift"},"region":{"startLine":195}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fbfeb826e8fc4b9883293bc1d66ce900688a2629e8aa65c21bc5c77ad93ce07"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This documentation could probably be clarified a bit more (potentially with \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/NavigationLink.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96ab7e99fdec102858ac2001e7becced7894e851d97577e7ae57dc2c2ec36261"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This is a conservative implementation, perhaps there are some situations \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/OptionalView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74c2e066b4e4488ccd5e69b7ac4edfb128f0896c57c6d1e6a9fc96def254f1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Verify that snapshotting works correctly with this \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ScrollView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10c64805fdf987fc35edf0a2162eb4e8350570f53debb595f61577841f290d0b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Allow backends to set their own ideal text field width \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SecureField.swift"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60f8d1846c28acc13a13058d6093c02ff30a98b15f4e8f5f54184b9c0fd70284"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Allow backends to set their own ideal text field width \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/TextField.swift"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df1f8e4d85f86ea91aa00ef99c9f9225a59f085b52c4ada59a6ee9e7d226620c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Don\u0027t rely on naturalSize for minimum size so that we can get Slider sizes without \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Slider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"054eed584109c1939af3fa9dc6b0cc0abd5061d9cef304eb044e3d649297e877"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Allow backends to specify their own ideal slider widths. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Slider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c658b6fc1e4dcfec82631772c6599df6603e2283de16772327fa3d6cc23c9da"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: If computeLayout ever becomes a pure requirement of View, then we \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SplitView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1d53eb95efdf3f264c7fe37039da6c96e26cfc1d1b6b208a8b817cd85dc05a6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out proper fixedSize behaviour (when width is unspecified) \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/SplitView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8433a0ecdcfbfc35891ecb7f9e089d2c641bdcd297080419f52e7b98ee5220ea"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Table snapshotting \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Table.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bbeff20a2a376d4d8c8b3984b89f65317f8897535fd4dc7828c7620d6b91a7a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out if this is required \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Table.swift"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13002368cd134c0adef57e629d7f74e80d17193394f5784b0a5b74595984a787"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Compute a proper ideal size for tables. Look to SwiftUI to see what it does. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Table.swift"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a5f9b2206ea1ff79ce219ec5989e75f27b4cb5db72ce838c3254d2af3850901"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Avoid overhead of converting \u0060cellContainerWidgets\u0060 to \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Table.swift"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef76475adbaa0b26e886bd730cf9850d192a68d383923117b49de4112f3407a7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Avoid this. Move it to commit once we figure out a solution for Gtk. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Text.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d98681336724e204365c7f021233a19472305c5ced2ba66f1bd3570242e138a7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement toggle button sizing within SwiftCrossUI so that we \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ToggleButton.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5aed118ba2b1efa2c3505da6f40caf7cf5d65f770b2805a293319af044f94e3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Make layout caching a ViewGraphNode feature so that we can handle \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ceafdc04d1b0106fb7d1c032bf57b4d4c027dc9e976d316423606e7d623def38"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Perhaps this can be split off into a separate protocol for the \u0060TupleViewN\u0060s \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/View.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4db8a40d8df01e3445af6f980947ad94031ae4d50ad117cd41f74a5915b60e5a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement picker sizing within SwiftCrossUI so that we can \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/_BuiltinPickerImplementation.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a3f97fcbc3fa527b90ea22fd9cfd7b149560ff3a32d043ae9415a3fde09d64b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Investigate the ordering of SwiftUI\u0027s preference merging for \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Layout/BackgroundModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce8bd2a15adf752571fc470b76c206c87c9e98ce187b30b84269c2c738d0025f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This probably doesn\u0027t have to trigger view updates. We\u0027re only \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnChangeModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8505fd68484d189e88218a553ecf08c1951bc35b209de6229dd6e3a5fd9a561"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Should this go in computeLayout or commit? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Modifiers/Handlers/OnChangeModifier.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97f6180bf8479955a942289c0c86b4675c09350fe736cd2a938006cf51d21a8b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out how .background could work on desktops \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Values/AppPhase.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f047ad946ca8af0cd03bbeb49e63c0616076843074844d766f2a8973013f27b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Research which line height ratio would be \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Values/Font.swift"},"region":{"startLine":299}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1668779bb86cdcc72f66c87d2be8da2004fcc9670870c42893377870b21e88e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Document State properly, this is an important type. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/State.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46a6d659ba44e74d64818ad33cc58669e425c5433b18b43986e7b43f1aa7e638"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Observe changes to persisted values made by external processes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/State/AppStorage/AppStorage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9cba41594b847bbac6768b41b6451832a13d68be3dcc10c99e66168e59c42b2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out whether this would still work if we didn\u0027t recompute the \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowReference.swift"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d7194ab87a44b75f5af491ddf3cd73dd08ee781ef362dc4b48c50ee19d426fe"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): How does SwiftUI handle space reservation during \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Layout/LayoutSystem.swift"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ae07529349af6fca2d70cb44b7c0c333e128316c47b1ed20302d81869da2e0f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Remove default padding from QBoxLayout related widgets. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9cf373af2f705b676cb76e00c986d334502f3a8dc58dcc3bef111f4ee5e6187"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Fix window size code, currently seems to get pretty ignored. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f06289194588d8be2e460404dda5cd6f8dbc515ae7d7d7cd2dc06eb731712dc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Get window resizability working. It seems to remain resizable no matter what \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9046b021278d17304415acfa5c2dce3ebe4b5eeec524122e7c714a9126bb7a70"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement text wrap setting \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b622c7b732eb996e7cd16f8a5baf9e8118fb35d5d0c7777be2ec5a217d6fc2d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement text wrap option \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e523ea1143041156869f7a98f9ff721cfbfd428ebddaa0d8267efaa2f223000"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Parse comment format to replace image includes, links, and similar \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":368}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0a6aff3d057c6b269f775ce3670a5feb31733823379167d8dceea32e4b6f9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Refactor so that notify::property signal handlers aren\u0027t just hacked into the \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bceb715571f04a2b643469c416cc592682fd76cbde7d21048229651885d1b24"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Handle this conversion more cleanly \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":727}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1380e0a51d97a6c472c66c5febc19ad5d675f7f7c5c445f83df119f0c7fab11f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Handle more types \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":738}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f342cd761c88f089db314f5ce126f19c26ff93823f5993ff0cdf57a2a578cec"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out why DropDown.selected doesn\u0027t work as a UInt (Gtk complains that \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":746}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b484ec50edf580a8dad77d4f2cbacbdf5aa552ead0a5f512ed866236d5f748b7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Handle namespaced types \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":753}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34310bc60978ea466fa84fb30206f26f369c720f5f04248153982f2fe0fc3c67"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Fix for \u0060gtk_scale_new_with_range\u0060 \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":834}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a07f25ad15c7927a9a883cd4aa27e0db16ffeefe563903a82690b5a8690603aa"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Handle nested pointer arrays more generally \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkCodeGen/GtkCodeGen.swift"},"region":{"startLine":868}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a5cd263faf949ff18ddf4216d6f876a3f810ddcf302ece9019f942cb61a6cf0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Should this be \u0060\u003E=\u0060 or \u0060==\u0060? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f21db53105c50a808dd972be398c26a25e563a25671d0ff75686928113d4bc1f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Should this be \u0060\u003E=\u0060 or \u0060==\u0060? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Helpers/TooltipContainer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f7323ed12d9bb343b6c7574566dc6f5eab06e004b26b030b71679f0e522ee166"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: React to theme changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/Core.swift"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94fe62c2b94cc6f7fa50ee4bb2b9d1d3bebdec566b3bbc4a855e92aa92729f35"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: React to theme changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/Core.swift"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0364b72cdccbb3ee201820ee6789e71ab770de0b4a3e3dd7628b22fa8ba4d53e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Don\u0027t hardcode this (if possible), because some Gtk \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ce672b4333c4a4a8a1a705566504f7f6c833769f6bb01a08a0d9f738ae95e7b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Don\u0027t hardcode this (if possible), because some Gtk \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CoreWindowing.swift"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be7c278c8833ac481c54d598a7d20f38ba932102f294f70885473acc3aa653a3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Update button label color using environment \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/StringLabelButtons.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b69b71847c9c66b3cf9b74e3b779b1e7b329136e2343b34de79eddb086b060d6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Update button label color using environment \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/StringLabelButtons.swift"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd3ba75bef9cbf85e6d0495258408ea4a054724e228dc21380038c6b5560a7ba"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: This doesn\u0027t seem to work on macOS at least \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9c2190a8e74b5c79bf6c8242252f40eb7f836d6d1509a37b023fefa864ea714"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: This doesn\u0027t seem to work on macOS at least \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d00feb40c070bb3083c901d1530438bdda560d9663bf4293cc191ee03eb4f32"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out if there\u0027s some magic way to disable minimization \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3eefeea84b6338f74ddedb4d85ab174297522e52c1969fd48f94c183a5f4d29"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Figure out if there\u0027s some magic way to disable minimization \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/WindowBehaviors.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae7c09ce1578ea076a18c2ead39453d60535049aef0e5ab6b83381dfade36f00"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Create a custom clipping container. Setting the CSS corner radius doesn\u0027t work \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Features/CornerRadius.swift"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40802d5ff50fa6d15ee08a4ae1619bf0fcc1665c58c80bb799cbbd6e330fcc3a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: Implement them so we can test them \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DummyBackend/UnimplementedFeatures.swift"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"485f4ddf0c062f839881229a93a9d3021cb87666f1f8f53d5e0a9a212146022c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Properly calculate layout \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c246e239b62a1e0f5b1c2097ac2cc2e26d4b356af83d00ee156b45a4a967875"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Properly calculate layout \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e805c992eb50a4b717336a1c7c445b176069590524db0a8bc5d84080ed9764e8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement text wrap handling \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2860b2d5527c2fd84f4e68bb622f5316cf3b806723ee25df9c5a84a6af90f95"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Properly implement padding container. Perhaps use a conversion factor to \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3edc3cd69fc01fa5f06fc7b89e3f1724461c01e9e908230add9d76ca2033d702"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Can this conversion fail? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/ColorPickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c78c2339baf26a1ec68fd7bfc0ffb1f5397918e1720b927f4d5c17efac1198f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: allowedContentTypes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/FileOpenDialogs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcc08b027b73f87f66a08a5a4c6a5617ab8af57351393aa8c6c02fa015b7f6ce"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: allowedContentTypes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/FileSaveDialogs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab73a155c2e054be1ac6bfc4e26fa369a2a29d5f4cfef8ceb2c1ab5285dbf205"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Implement decimalPlaces \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/Sliders.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c7a973f033de6b35c8e2aabe2596b94250250d824aa5fcb34646e8e172c7bc1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Once DatePickerStyle is more like PickerStyle, the FrameLayout wrapper will \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BDatePickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"134c5d663c8a2f701b2aa3d043e29689eb108d96b1007ce81990e309665e090d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Once swift-bundler supports XML resources in libraries, implement \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BDatePickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d364871cb02a8e4eaebeb506fd6c25fcdf7eb7658f40d882c0d8c9b944d19023"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Implement .segmented using MaterialButtonToggleGroup \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BPickers.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"445d57103bd20bdef331034cbfaf814887974099aa29897185d31f204c4e8f30"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Fix the background behavior and implement detents. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend\u002BSheets.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07f35cee8896540c8af48ba5bceed93c0d3ead485c377d47b56c3ef6c8a60212"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Properly support multiple calls to createWindow \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee128abc7c3a5a3814c26f73f07385c3dc2276bc6fb9fe559e2290911deb64eb"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Update window theme? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"944bb7381e7ced669eda6b8b8d6fbcde768a78e7fcc11d3d2a2e822443c75547"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //        // TODO(stackotter): Set close handler? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94f3340a1b3e09a66f4fb225b581b14ac1bd96651e280b16cfc347096870f97c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Handle navigation titles. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b2d8b052d81886e37de4ebd31f6379eda03576b4421fab1af0d34b5f7f66286"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Handle orientation changes and other changes such \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d65d2795517b57f2958459c73f7f9c9d60dc83c7a7050b9ce60d0e9debbdfa4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //        // TODO(stackotter): Register app menu items as shortcuts when we support keyboard \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"382ee7e3f3288b329fa9baa7062f02c8e959f296b8ea67bb27b5ff1585e97ffc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: //        // TODO(stackotter): Handle incoming URLs \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":282}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1b4db3892ce7b979ea715f3f3ba3085d8137e474a54d6441e38c917d9707f6e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Listen for system theme changes \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":357}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a5eaf957f84e2dd4dae434fe687aa5c843c717605fec10fdd6f13567822a1f8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): React to per-window environment changes. See \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":375}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1e7406cad0b29ec5069b7c6084ca5f55045415066139ef5aae1ac6aaf2ce851"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Support dismantleAndroidView \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/AndroidViewRepresentable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b65ad84d9e8a586f80135da6d76caacaf2d95b73e85240d42adc8bb875f16d4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(bbrk24): Once we upgrade to androidx.fragment 1.4 or later, this could just be \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AndroidBackend/Kotlin/FragmentRepresentingView.kt"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e35b299161860f10ab9441445c87a053c75a0049606569a635cad5aaff58a5a4"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Update SwiftBundlerRuntime to support fetching \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/WindowingExample/WindowingApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f527105fc78a1cf2d7d4e64db1d08e3bdc905fa84aa625a192bf7f17bee19e0c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: This is unsafe, index could change/not exist anymore \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/NotesExample/ContentView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"495da6b7f8aaea05ff4b6fdcda11f318f48561b390a88bd7f97de7802dea3c45"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Is this needed? If so, can SwiftCrossUI enforce it? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/MediaPlayer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0a0012d2df466b5d662e5dd6809f5bd93796298d51356bee9e5af23838ed297"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Propagate this warning to the user \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/MediaPlayer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"228bfadd65632d959116a25b95452708505e543444e2dfaeb90e05da3b6a0df7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Propagate errors from here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/PlaybackBar.swift"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4e3767c12754c7fa2fad76179f448655f4023af3951e239405a144dbf85009f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Fix the underlying issue that caused this workaround to \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/PlaybackBar.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9adabeb5d6111c34be998ef4d4a87549ff4b7f9233a40e99d1defd9af2d77705"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Wire this up to some sort of visual indication \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/PlaylistView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cab8743ba263795cd9b5dea83c670a5e20fad891281649fc428eca4b1a360f16"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Warn the user that their config file was invalid and has been backed up \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/Storage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26855ecd7bdb0dc1a0f2a68f89bdc6c208d6261c0328369d245e5f3e3aed31cd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Relay this failure to the user in a toast somehow \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/MusicPlayerExample/Storage.swift"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41a07b7213a0b39394546daee4e98ced326fc7573b72c97c4b0d18243687b811"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: replace with List once bug described in #556 is fixed"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/GradientsExample/GradientsApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14e80dbb4028e2f4d8979bc651161ac27ad616fb9de2ae2f032ea0004bf711bc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(kaleb): Remove this hacky enum once we can apply arbitrary labels to picker options. \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/FontsExample/FontsApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9439821f662981810f90d129a3d21fab2993cd55cc99c54701b1c46796b870f8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO(stackotter): Repair Picker.inspect implementations post \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Examples/Sources/AdvancedCustomizationExample/AdvancedCustomizationApp.swift"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19395d553eeee2e04be4f47e261bc3e9e818e50de879cf5387c1e3b13454af27"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Include transitive conformances by iterating through protocols as well \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"APITool/Sources/APITool/Analyzer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f948e989d5c123833eb1a6df48a155965edcc7cae9f1dba23dee0a31a06b110"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: This is really janky, but it\u0027d be a lot of effort to \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"APITool/Sources/APITool/Differ.swift"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e089adb69ab7ed2d701be5a02b0a5e26b938873abcfeb40ed0ae1d9965dabd6"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 2 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (48192 LoC, 1203 module-visible types across 73 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98599c1dcd57dd26c38bb642b839326816fcf6dd04cf5839408b8ea61654c629"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad3bf6eff406b48ca9ec7b6e9f397a9f90774c5abe24823214524ae56b1a785a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c8c2692648c2d543f731ff77b0f3da30b89c67599718b55820d9575a9656435"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3337b1dbb3cbf3b807a66fb7a68b5b4b1402ebe7a75fcc36bb6dab8cc509baa9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c035855fa2cdbda421881996efedc2ebef95010f687d4bb920102a8596ab1d43"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2f9297b298beb76bf69a9745aa78b769bde20f6552fcd3e9cb638a233a97806"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c2c84e7a03414a633957c242026d81ddca980cdfd6b49e01d19669e2789120c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cbe1721b54486034b877645295b1becce8ab0022b248cf8043e9f48595d0c43"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed0c4cec778503153baca58a09654df56d5c90d6dc88778e127df31c56aeeaa3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3701a6078db991bf71059d3dad3e8d8382eb9eb0ce9b90d49af3cb5ccc02472b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd305e827d6200a1254c3adce7ceaa7b48047e2c8fc0b391dda60cb8fe35c2e1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8690b175232a831b403fdb0be97412cec76310b01ce25543409982f99a5014c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10df7a4893857bde9cde71683b0b5b73d5376c5900efabe19ba26dbc041b739a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8cf01c63e071ba94fd11ad394db2f26b3ad5ef8107aa3fbd578942af005dc4a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ee5dbf9097037a6b48a1c5a6652865c6d4509fdd144791d668372ab349a9f28"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"777c629d580c5ee24ba24d906bceccd6a3a004a5b49221b409d5afefdf8d205b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44a9d56daa6f6c5cf7f3c73e0765ab1cbdd67850e8dd68e57ea4b4ddbb4dc67d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7995a62dee6c4a65ff0f8702fa243a5cdde43d6dfb5f79a3a71ba0556ba982ff"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cca7563ada6612456231fe65951cc14ebad65664b9bfa85b3c0c8fbee9e29bf2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2af8ee82e842320ce1489175ac8a3637342741be2d5a3b17a62b63982e5844a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f9b4aee5fd048f8918ff31592046f1e21d52f9d84d8dd4baf5f612306f91a96"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"435babd67ec5b872c6b820164e0ad0f42fb97a015b024568a91a1fb3c2e87e64"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"def0e4df875404bff38c61b57fe7ba89ef6b7fc0e3b06ed4393ba0c062a599ba"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09f1fc76e18ece437b8310f1956a282652ad8c22b1ae958897cb76d490427de6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb8f21b981db4b5008be8aafa23334ecc951c77d117d9e7b8c804414a1697dae"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e155891b82d7b2f2c2cd081119268a8869d4b5d63b6c3202eae4d455717af62"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e9b6b5a353c9cfaf1f051cc8e4afad287aefd7efe6eb14d1ba6c52952d77996"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc2cd1632bbdaaf6a18c21ce1cc470ec0ade63aed3dd90ad8ce717fa0922e999"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e535a739afe503505fd3cb82a3a4947fc5f55390b4767b9abe00c2cf6338bd0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f4f714823562ae2fcf2d0836f2bbf3e197fdbbaf9ea18dc2ee2210c7ddd1142"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb9d3dca72af99a344f114ad22104f620f1ac2b3168c81d74a7fd6f149475ba1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c6ab989b8889fe34241e6ac563062471e041832404662d8e5dc007a361dece9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4e7e332f911c2f3e7faf68e85e1028febe6bd1d94b45efd1d1006626bdb4b3b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a309fe562c4aaf8827cd816748b50992f874b23777bdaf7be0f678b99951791"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"881fe771920553c0fd4a710bfb96737b99bd1439d49f0fd78d7f3ace1caa0e38"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6397b8359eafc073b1fa5ed8c91542e16008a3b42115eeea223a6625a4274f0a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23f8e8779775e61d1b0c2d7681b102c9a7332eaca95c810934cdbc357334bf75"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26ab1362a50278f9b52762d641655e66ca09ece4f0501b4d61030f38bc3ef9aa"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"606bb6b7b1f5fc0cf105b558b410dc01055ed0ab87c334467fb8c78230cde11e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe2d688610b51e0a5a02c7c5dd1724a4986e40f2689fb84510e2ec0164c27d6a"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"becbc5502f94878197b05d70c7ef15f1353fd99a90efcb824b9c43f11ae5ce7a"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62ba3f391b97d680ac34e630794a6a7fc0f3b16bd44bab9e323085ff4fa2c944"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: AppKitBackend.swift \u2192 DummyBackend.swift, Window.swift, Gtk3Backend.swift, GtkBackend.swift, EnvironmentValues.swift, WindowGroup.swift, WindowReference.swift, Menu.swift, UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift, UIKitBackend\u002BMenu.swift, UIKitBackend.swift, WinUIBackend.swift: \u0060Sources/AppKitBackend/AppKitBackend.swift\u0060 changes together with 12 other files \u2014 \u0060Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/Gtk/Widgets/Window.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Environment/EnvironmentValues.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowGroup.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowReference.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Menu.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BMenu.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 12 separate couplings, not 12 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 12."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/AppKitBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eefd916dd2c40e0ffaa40e038f7c7c3433eb63c6676c89f06024af16622f4a5"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: EitherView.swift \u2194 OptionalView.swift: \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/OptionalView.swift\u0060 change together 75% of the time (12 of the 16 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 12 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060fe55b944\u0060 Allow arbitrary views to be used in menus (w/ invalid views ignored) \u2026; \u0060fa5314b8\u0060 Reimplement NavigationStack under new layout system and fix EitherVie\u2026; \u0060f0503376\u0060 Reimplement OptionalView \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/EitherView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03384fb39006146bac2b5eb1e90ca31b8452fcdbb09eca34bc3e8222bdb856eb"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: Gtk3Backend.swift \u2194 Menu.swift: \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Menu.swift\u0060 change together 69% of the time (9 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060f68c6efa\u0060 Bump to Swift 6.1 in preparation for AndroidBackend (fix conc warnings); \u00602ff5a910\u0060 Support environment in menus (#514); \u0060c17943d4\u0060 Add support for \u0060Divider\u0060 in menus (#318) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8eb0e50123d97cdece796b94ad241f10d8d2017b05ef149a9a08b16bd6a47ab5"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: DummyBackend.swift \u2194 Gtk3Backend.swift: \u0060Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3Backend.swift\u0060 change together 63% of the time (12 of the 19 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 12 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u00601b89cc44\u0060 Introduce ColorPicker support (#735); \u00607ae81c81\u0060 AppKitBackend: Implement window frame restoration (fixes #383) (#652); \u00601e320506\u0060 Re-add corner radius container and implement on Android (#638) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88f41a35184bba962b86c8dc79c3e912f3179e989334a9bf4affa00adb69174b"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: GtkBackend.swift \u2192 DummyBackend.swift, WindowGroup.swift, Toggle.swift, UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift: \u0060Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift\u0060 changes together with 4 other files \u2014 \u0060Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Scenes/WindowGroup.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Toggle.swift\u0060, \u0060Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BControl.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/GtkBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45981431a824090dcc375d11b2d2cb0ef81b4830fbe3ebde1ccc6e91d55b8868"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: DummyBackend.swift \u2194 WinUIBackend.swift: \u0060Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/WinUIBackend/WinUIBackend.swift\u0060 change together 63% of the time (12 of the 19 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 12 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u00601b89cc44\u0060 Introduce ColorPicker support (#735); \u00607ae81c81\u0060 AppKitBackend: Implement window frame restoration (fixes #383) (#652); \u00601e320506\u0060 Re-add corner radius container and implement on Android (#638) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DummyBackend/DummyBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"633f1dcd1b8b054e539fd48a18d38bbe9528b986305eac4c866ecc62d263cf32"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fb6201b087481b5ba9942333ee203aa5ce902da46c57d5ac63cfe092176bb63"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11b89a829a87e355da5a297850e5de66c400376766af1b7430cfd5d7d5007621"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a6c7ccb1fd55f7c5aef6cb4eb520067b828b6d95dfef59fef26267e8028b6f6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Large public API surface: 778/1078 types (72%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract \u2014 keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed2ba843444ae377c17142f58f714e281e4bd3f183ab100ee1fbef389875d3e6"}},{"ruleId":"P2","level":"note","message":{"text":"Logging is not universal: Only 1/2 runnable modules use logging (modules with no entry point or server are excluded \u2014 they are libraries a runnable module hosts). Silent: \u0060APITool\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91a94e21d6d4d0e6a2003f94505b0b02b157176f0b24c4820f3f82b4447a97fe"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 25012 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".github/workflows/build-test-and-docs.yml"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060children is TupleViewChildren || children is EmptyViewChildren\u0060 appears character-identically in 4 files \u2014 Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/HStack.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/VStack.swift, Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/ZStack.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUI/Views/Group.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb79e89c2d65aedc844788834cd00a2480f6f150f0fbf2cb60339703cbf1d439"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060gtkWidget.expandHorizontally \u0026\u0026 gtkWidget.useExpandHorizontally\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift, Sources/GtkBackend/GtkWidgetRepresentable.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec8c30a9aabb4280795a23fa23d9c6415bd16d92618735a2d61f137cede8b1b7"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060gtkWidget.expandVertically \u0026\u0026 gtkWidget.useExpandVertically\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift, Sources/GtkBackend/GtkWidgetRepresentable.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/Gtk3Backend/Gtk3WidgetRepresentable.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f767b864bd03f86ca56c5e04f3003615c4e183d51e4fe15d8cfa85c0281ccd5f"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060limitedHeight \u003C height || lineLimitSettings.reservesSpace\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextViews.swift, Sources/UIKitBackend/UIKitBackend\u002BPassive.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/AppKitBackend/Features/TextViews.swift"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa7784bdbb8df2662ea17d659f8a258b7a7141d8de15539946740237b7aaaeb5"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060os(macOS) || os(iOS) || os(tvOS) || os(watchOS) || os(visionOS)\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift, Sources/LVGLBackend/LVGLBackend.swift, Sources/QtBackend/QtBackend.swift. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/CursesBackend/CursesBackend.swift"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ddc34fa03391867f3b07c2583be89ade9d0ae2a675ae17199cd0a86f411bb98"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/GtkBackend/Features/RevealFiles.swift"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f24bf6e030891d2103b73677ac0bcd2883ab829f28947d6193e370e9c06ee432"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060expansion\u0060 turns every thrown error into \u0060[]\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or let it propagate (\u0060throws\u0060). If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the \u0060catch\u0060, \u0060guard\u0060 or \u0060??\u0060, or in the doc comment, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/SwiftCrossUIMacrosPlugin/EntryMacro.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c0c4cb0796694cdbdfb6801904a4cc6e43d3698ec79dde34b1ced97cbc3047b"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","guid":"c859d8ea-8b24-a157-9406-94929c10397a","name":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)","shortDescription":{"text":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-04-Poisoned-Pipeline-Execution"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":50,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}