{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P5","name":"DR \u0026 Backup","shortDescription":{"text":"DR \u0026 Backup"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P5"},{"id":"P7","name":"Outbound HTTP resilience","shortDescription":{"text":"Outbound HTTP resilience"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P7"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R11","name":"Import Boundaries","shortDescription":{"text":"Import Boundaries"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R11"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R5","name":"Dependency Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R5"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command (cyclomatic 38): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f3c52a8c2fb830fa2591831ca9816a5074f7921b1e7d6e719a8a5d612a64f05"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::hardcap::handle_buy_and_sell_logic (cyclomatic 32): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::hardcap::handle_buy_and_sell_logic has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca7a1b0d819a914b8005bfea6af022074e104b30bd7dc68600b31c89b1f5d7a1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::secondbuy::handle_detection_event (cyclomatic 30): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::secondbuy::handle_detection_event has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/secondbuy.rs"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"52586116348a811b9cb78196d2e438886a3e21cd054a462332d87f95e0a85b31"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc.handleStream (cyclomatic 21): grpc.handleStream has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 86). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c9aff14ed39363df4447c4fc3b2866087bc7f8354b12b4f62cfa9f84118a993"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc.handleStream (cyclomatic 21): grpc.handleStream has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 86). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"210bc4d006c6ea8d16eab2d5b3ffada9b8c9230431d99d55ad4a56e37e183c2d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"parsingtransaction.tOutPut (cyclomatic 19): parsingtransaction.tOutPut has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Of this number, 12 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76a70631c6b06ea04fc674362171cef4fc90b27430a1eb3a42f686e4fa740119"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"parsingtransaction.tOutPut (cyclomatic 19): parsingtransaction.tOutPut has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Of this number, 12 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9769a8ecc8d0d40a5019986183028cd13b2a9085aabc4bc286aa60c53f5aad4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cyclomatic 16): swap.swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8429ec8f5bc6cafd3b084632b8bed6917f18c429d3a6bf1305acccc28241012"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"parsingtransaction.parseTransactionFromData (cyclomatic 16): parsingtransaction.parseTransactionFromData has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 9 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f82e8cf4e1061b06c0251cae0e94e559b24b2186d2eab5a5331f07797a6c50a4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cyclomatic 16): swap.swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d84efe989d18a56ccb1bc9270973754f4b40d731b82afa67275fa62ba87f4039"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"parsingtransaction.parseTransactionFromData (cyclomatic 16): parsingtransaction.parseTransactionFromData has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 9 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cd6807a6aa8f1518ffe72b223de82753328042ca4d3fd5d51e9f45493fcfb93"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cyclomatic 16): swap.swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72f3db98c3f7225328dd7f9d7428b0128197df24e9c2217f4c7390f495528c23"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::secondbuy::handle_detection_event (cognitive 139): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::secondbuy::handle_detection_event has cognitive complexity 139 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (127 pts), loops 2 (8 pts), boolean chains 3, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 110). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/secondbuy.rs"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc4256a373c3cdd06748e853e009b9d764e408eb1f74b65a2adecb00442419cb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::hardcap::handle_buy_and_sell_logic (cognitive 119): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::hardcap::handle_buy_and_sell_logic has cognitive complexity 119 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (103 pts), loops 2 (8 pts), match/switch 1 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 88). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a983b3fbe672eaf6f4e2ea60fad4467d55507930a653ca84917ad78cd7554273"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command (cognitive 68): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 32 (56 pts), match/switch 5 (9 pts), loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 30). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9d448267271354bac7e964bf2053dcdc79c400ad78af3b95a188b54d6a91219"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HttpSender::send (cognitive 48): HttpSender::send has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (29 pts), match/switch 4 (17 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 35). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/json-rpc-client/src/jsonrpc_client/http_sender.rs"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fbb4b4e3693cc48086e401b9bccf795fab422afb7e35f1b6ec9712fcc5cc39a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc.handleStream (cognitive 29): grpc.handleStream has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (19 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2, loops 2, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 29 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 86). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3c89c1f76de98ae2a45a1c6a5ee039d2660a951ee7a87d4058d562402f24739"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc.handleStream (cognitive 29): grpc.handleStream has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (19 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2, loops 2, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 29 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 86). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcfea4e4ce26f7484e345a89d5ebfa1ede12d8c89111fed5d601fc738daa8adb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cognitive 25): swap.swap has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a409da7b0e7899776a87ccca4aee4fd2cd6ea17ef5e8edcc5827ac31c254e296"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cognitive 25): swap.swap has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf77acc0992f4aee1f8ed7a552d8c13d26b265d94e16a17c79906d6801cb2816"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"swap.swap (cognitive 25): swap.swap has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (18 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e401e42f34ca6496d447ff0797e78502ba14d10f0c6a9f7749b1ef81e44a495a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::shred_stream::reconcile_flows (cognitive 24): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::shred_stream::reconcile_flows has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (17 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/shred_stream.rs"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b54859ca4b279fbd52b9044e824f3cacba07f11744227c5128b693f8214a878f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::core::tx::new_signed_and_send (cognitive 20): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::core::tx::new_signed_and_send has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/tx.rs"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aad842537107746d7f5db37f9110ba3c31ac0beafcf8c8ad619259f936c27dbb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::shred_stream::reconcile_sells (cognitive 19): grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::shred_stream::reconcile_sells has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (15 pts), loops 2, boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/shred_stream.rs"},"region":{"startLine":371}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"475c43ee0aff1aef45ba580b650652cded909c18ee48cbdb19777ad3d7b48595"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: src/instructions.rs: FileTooLong \u2014 1395 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded, and inline test code \u2014 #[cfg(test)] modules and bare #[test] functions \u2014 not counted), declaring 62 free functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 895 over it, 2.79\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a4d5488982603ad65e6254f0647f567fde91faf9bcdc01e6881c6d045cc1f27"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: BoughtTokenInfo: TooManyMethods \u2014 47 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 17 over it, 1.57\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/shared_state/src/lib.rs"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbb5bf3d4ae15447109d989d0d6912e6e3a264186046f37773da5a1b4fe6eb17"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command: FunctionTooLong \u2014 grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust::commands::handle_command runs 127 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded, and inline test code \u2014 #[cfg(test)] modules and bare #[test] functions \u2014 not counted) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 27 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea8c98aa41bf19bf92123e3c8a608be4c881dcae11e568d7b79b751156a1cf3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: parsingtransaction.parseTransactionData: FunctionTooLong \u2014 parseTransactionData runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afd4bd377f0620437b22b67b39e400c1fa232c6f55b1ecd6cbfc400ae0218905"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FunctionTooLong: parsingtransaction.parseTransactionData: FunctionTooLong \u2014 parseTransactionData runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"351e1e3378b7b51f846cc429c8fee08c02f5a254c2c6a0d88a928a5b93d2ffe1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (51 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs:120-170 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs:119-169 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":120}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"366b064b2d2609a514995618ea699afe123869d606a59ffe4d3232aa4e598d6f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201320 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/shred_stream.rs:298-316 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/shred_stream.rs:337-356 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/shred_stream.rs"},"region":{"startLine":298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"feef20cf2e422a63de1aa9a7cc1ac3007af942464fdd794fce536b789344b272"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs:63-76 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs:63-76 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 34 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78dfdebc080f25154d918fb6f953aa3be84ff563b9bf58609e952e60ef5b286e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:890-901 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1520-1531 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":890}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0219feae9b6ce90ce3480f3945afd81fa965739b044e7f130911f94a3f6de76"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:974-985 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1598-1609 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":974}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54c74b5998b57c3836ec70c26e352867e208d5b156637e2c7b5676cd1f8a2cb3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1010-1021 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1634-1645 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":1010}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6010c95c385368a26c78c496e8e44ccf9022919e04b52a4fa0d6a3f4c7a06cab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs:83-93 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs:82-92 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b6511a00a83a16a73f2cb6e25382825ddc54ceae077965523438de75f996660"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:887-895 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1201-1209 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":887}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f38b25208d2e6d8c231c19a7372765a4e58ca7efa8b7d0be916908f06a591f9e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1007-1015 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs:1323-1331 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/parsers/pump_interface/src/instructions.rs"},"region":{"startLine":1007}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd36005659983a447c41490daab3410664158666dbdc35d788ba58eed59d8e38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs:54-61 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs:51-58 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dfa4dbfac908294e33bcc3f1fbda86bcdef56fe39069f71a34f94e0ab45081c1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5\u20136 lines \u00D7 3): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs:96-101 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs:114-119 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs:131-135 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"489326b8aada39aeb35abe6326c1a52a877fd9622564eaa457ad09abbfb526da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/secondbuy.rs:33-37 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/secondbuy.rs:112-116 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/secondbuy.rs"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cabe9b881dc240aa1f8aa992379fa976f8705bc9640059e66f33eb47aa09ed3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs:34-39 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs:34-39 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 34 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d3e07ea37271936d002e6aabad5673b352461e0dc5bab5338885f567a1eb090"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs:41-48 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs:41-48 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 34 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d655673de3ca1452c596cbd64a22c4dddb1ec2d68605d7b5575b7a325b80c46f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs:50-55 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs:50-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/logger.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 34 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/common/logger.rs"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9190ce701565ea7e841b0c313fbcde2ef6de5a0f0b9f5073b3cd286cc1658ac4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs:171-180 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs:170-179 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f66f7c4bf8c37670c7c16f718b8c1110a8ac7bc83d6752b84a2a05d2397c8fa0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/tx.rs:163-172 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/tx.rs:191-200 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/tx.rs"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"928bfc08f8117cda8f1dd2ac172660e1aa9b2dc46883f3efc9d290fadd3d3e57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/token.rs:67-75 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/token.rs:94-102 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/core/token.rs"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"722869f11b4c59dc1b6450c3ccff4eb97151f5707e740d838a898ab268ca7765"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs:76-83 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs:113-119 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"979aba2b58455c15373f6a8bb9e27a61a39fec8d96a711fa46e1c85bd7837cde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs:65-70 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs:124-129 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/hardcap.rs"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f124f81de50e87946b1f60b4924b30b0a06963b02b352559dc5b7c3e8c43d3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs:54-58 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/nextblock.rs:49-53 | #_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs:51-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs\u0060 and \u0060#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 85 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9512d6859501ea5b4539c28238bdc107f1f080cd8a424fd9cb3ea5defba55abb"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: pump_interface: pump_interface: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c56cc5d1f78f2688b43e5aeeddf180d33176c0c2e3f1f45e299349edcd9c89d9"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: shared_state: shared_state: abstractness 0.00, instability 0.00, distance 1.00 \u2014 the shape a shared-kernel / building-block library has BY DESIGN \u2014 concrete and widely depended-on is what makes it useful, and this dimension does not penalise it (the distance is reported for completeness, not as a defect). Worth a look only if it has grown past one coherent kernel into an everything-bucket."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e19ac356255d9a1f8ad7da0ec91784e6c5dd28d15feda54aeda6ff0ce04c271"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: jito-block-engine-json-rpc-client: jito-block-engine-json-rpc-client: abstractness 0.20, instability 0.00, distance 0.80 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31f3daca6c9e9f7fb1da441baffe1d270977628cf5ef5f9daefba4985aa8e154"}},{"ruleId":"D14","level":"error","message":{"text":"Banned license: @raydium-io/raydium-sdk: \u0060@raydium-io/raydium-sdk\u0060 1.3.1-beta.58 is published on registry.npmjs.org under \u0060GPL-3.0\u0060, which this policy bans, and it is a PRODUCTION dependency this repository\u0027s committed lockfile resolves \u2014 so it is installed by everything that depends on this repository, not just by its build toolchain. A package offering SEVERAL licences is a choice and is only charged when every one of them is banned. Replace the package, or record an accepted exception."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6348d8c7fe8a34300583c300e27d22f4e86017d7ff2799aae8f4801e22764b9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: encrypt \u0060key\u0060 before storing, e.g. AES with ENCRYPTION_KEY \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/commands.rs"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58e495ca185e5abee4e7885e7cf480b45d151878d3ff6830ec78447442ad3566"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Massive redundancy in instruction generation methods. For every action (initialize, set_params, create, buy, sell, withdraw), there are 6 distinct methods differing only by whether they take a program_id, keys vs accounts, or require signing seeds. This creates a 6x explosion of API surface for identical logical operations.: Unify into a single builder pattern or a single method that accepts a flexible context object (containing keys, accounts, and optional program_id/seeds). Alternatively, provide a high-level \u0060build_instruction\u0060 method that handles the program_id lookup internally, removing the need for explicit \u0060_with_program_id\u0060 variants. (signatures: pump_interface.instructions.initialize_ix_with_program_id | pump_interface.instructions.initialize_ix | pump_interface.instructions.initialize_invoke_with_program_id | pump_interface.instructions.initialize_invoke | pump_interface.instructions.initialize_invoke_signed_with_program_id | pump_interface.instructions.initialize_invoke_signed)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29d5745e1e59a35e765a81b0417585a71f50fb0366dc371a6f00b8bff368dd04"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicate RPC client instances. Both \u0060AppState\u0060 and \u0060Pump\u0060 structs maintain two separate fields for RPC clients: one blocking (\u0060rpc_client\u0060) and one non-blocking (\u0060rpc_nonblocking_client\u0060). This duplicates state management and initialization logic across multiple structs.: Extract the dual-client pattern into a dedicated \u0060RpcClientPair\u0060 or \u0060ConnectionPool\u0060 struct that is shared across \u0060AppState\u0060 and \u0060Pump\u0060, rather than duplicating the fields in every consumer. (signatures: grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.common.utils.AppState.rpc_client | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.common.utils.AppState.rpc_nonblocking_client | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.dex.pump_fun.Pump.rpc_client | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.dex.pump_fun.Pump.rpc_nonblocking_client)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"961579f6593435c6a98f1336143e6f04ca7697c8271e539079f680cb5947e82e"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Identical types defined in multiple service modules. \u0060TipAccountResult\u0060 is defined identically in \u0060jito\u0060, \u0060nextblock\u0060, and \u0060zeroslot\u0060 services, violating DRY principles and creating maintenance overhead.: Move \u0060TipAccountResult\u0060 to a common shared module (e.g., \u0060grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.common.types\u0060) and import it in all service modules. (signatures: grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.services.jito.TipAccountResult | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.services.nextblock.TipAccountResult | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.services.zeroslot.TipAccountResult)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3a0b04e26ff1e6eef7375b2fb01136958124c96bec488bbc67a48776edf4029"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Identical types defined in multiple service modules. \u0060BundleStatus\u0060 is defined identically in \u0060jito\u0060 and \u0060zeroslot\u0060 services.: Move \u0060BundleStatus\u0060 to a common shared module (e.g., \u0060grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.common.types\u0060) and import it in all service modules. (signatures: grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.services.jito.BundleStatus | grpc_raydium_pool_monitoring_rust.services.zeroslot.BundleStatus)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec06eb88fc0cb692065ada59b0a347b4cf92b65924fdcd79f4ba77cbdcadcf76"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Redundant type definitions for account data. \u0060GlobalAccount\u0060 is a wrapper around \u0060Global\u0060 (exposing it as \u0060.0\u0060) that adds serialization methods. \u0060BondingCurve\u0060 and \u0060BondingCurveAccount\u0060 follow the same pattern. This forces users to choose between the raw data struct and the serializable wrapper, or understand the \u0060.0\u0060 access pattern.: Implement \u0060Serialize\u0060 and \u0060Deserialize\u0060 traits directly on the data structs (\u0060Global\u0060, \u0060BondingCurve\u0060) if possible, or provide a macro/derive that generates the wrapper automatically, removing the need for explicit \u0060*Account\u0060 types in the public API. (signatures: pump_interface.accounts.Global | pump_interface.accounts.GlobalAccount)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f9cfb1eefad9b1e8b7dba66febfbade0b74ea8a10876d5efd6c688bc28ae856"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"405093f977846b7fa76ef83496d1b52e7f48a475d12f499283ae9e84b51414d3"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d55060801769f87c5c918a37df56185bd5daa2fb7f910b6873a2541339543e04"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e856a4024edfd7da89d0069c85055f86057a042e6c93c707b9bb60a6930738fc"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39c1bebe36f4b79ff4515e8dc704f7d323ef596f5b7ce1ecdb49e14a7769cc14"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da324238afb79a9ed0338d860ae4ee9302368caed50b78cc0f1f10404b0116e0"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b435374afc3cc0df826d337ea2355f548a8a4fc5e14c5d745175d435dae5c821"},"properties":{"commitSha":"086ec82844a8e798f60a82c9bfbbe84c3e12d1f3"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a71814a8573e0219e11cc9533b3dd0a1d3da14f571fd6b426eaf771ae4b9238"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"uglify-js","version":"1.0.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0220c96bdca3e2148b33decebbe8383f672e81353870315c5199357fb21fc4d"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"form-data","version":"2.3.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"242dd69968f8dcb0b3bc01da19455ba442f6fbc0d6e3b37217336fbc654b26fb"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"form-data","version":"4.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1335f7d72861cb58710b6276aaf9fa1acff0e581f7c34f5c613965b3cb9a198"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"protobufjs","version":"7.5.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65c36fab48a6bdeb1c13ddb146c3b6dcff146fb815658a925db4d0e56a668c84"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"3.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f9af266ee75e379717360668cf86ab3719f2495ce60b511a81f6abccb272a35e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"9.0.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76b94845ff177666cc8de4bdd97526ef55c898d1e85fcbbde410e487b2e317a1"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"axios","version":"1.11.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js","line":1}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1c9e084527cf3ca8eacb1dfe8e5d4b423c89410467d00260b054ad241b1b053"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"axios","version":"0.27.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"production","file":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js","line":1}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"577d29afa2fbf128124715ff1fdc5e878ac31c0d1dc3912003b05769c0d0af09"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"bigint-buffer","version":"1.1.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88ed475dcc1a1e97766181d6f19798c14e40651ba5bdea57484192fec8466c76"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"1.1.12","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3eb4e65579dba6499768cd480d95d04fa9233356ac24d05f723f510c6fab055"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"2.0.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee49ef6d956a7f997b29a128aac54e8273f4bd408aa9a5c8708d81bdcdf0f6d2"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@grpc/grpc-js","version":"1.13.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fc3eab13ba2c921e65e43d4327257183c125781bb3460dbe3676cab4989335a"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"glob","version":"10.4.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3dca22ad5fc5bdbdd83835c17be8913984a1307e7038300776ae455f613856b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"toml","version":"3.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd0bf8b1201e5002d84b1f76e0ed6ec2f83344bb8030afc08f51e815ff0d9d2b"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ws","version":"7.5.10","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b722e15369fd135032f2aff67c208373345fc88d0610dc9f27dadb54742a1818"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ws","version":"8.18.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf1f55a61f547ffcf680525383ecee5eee4d0f74dc39c171260fe46f5e53f650"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ws","version":"8.18.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad39892db19a2c58dd995ad067f341141c2333c75743e2b859e1c54e885bfa92"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"picomatch","version":"2.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e35e184ec599b86e3f2586462565a2aeb0eab8ec0d1c755f0cbfc8000854ab9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"picomatch","version":"4.0.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8ce9ede03d2117ccadddd782c74696984a36c9d9a84d5d6f9585b9d97b871d4"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"form-data","version":"4.0.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bc5a8fa2c1ca2e1f8d657dbb3f67e4e79dbb1d127f779a694773a2c82eaba38"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"rollup","version":"4.47.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3bf14ee5499d0d8f3d2bde08e3caeb32735e27a938ee61b3ced70fc298db95e"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ip-address","version":"10.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48ad5cbdb8d88be9825be40027277e9d328e0ac4a6e6fbb55a35c66850bd0747"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"tmp","version":"0.2.5","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36ceed6b72f5f529862b3a8a02af088d7b0e4986a4e229b659f6bc7e9319565f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"underscore","version":"1.13.7","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72d34b6a2873626de6c1b417b2a44761d2404e350877f2705dedc30727d883a5"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"lodash","version":"4.17.21","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c26c0ebf103b3665afb4abfdeba3f5b93ac45891818aa67bb712d43f3046f73"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"validator","version":"13.15.15","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8fc7cbfc3359037754d2d90d507e0b8b89ed6efbec3b6deff31b25f5652035d7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ajv","version":"6.12.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6aef882540e7616e653de03da78a6260b97b2a75a7c9ff4c4b78b0dbd0377de9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"bn.js","version":"4.11.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f30f3eb7ac546d931f1acc7646832341997d4d86094b57c9193e7110e6037f4"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"bn.js","version":"4.12.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae1d3ec22e2aeb570c5c7db879dd70d3a9f0fd74f3f313eb9a6b5bbf4bc559ce"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"bn.js","version":"5.2.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0536657d690ceb8190131e4a3a3d3ebb33fa394f54ef23f00c557d82d5bcb5a9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"bn.js","version":"5.2.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b67cdaa529888671e62cbe79120d6d4b9b3e35ad1e23b2b1ceae0b3146de65e9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"qs","version":"6.5.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a4a1b2b4e990a511238bcb707bb30756c1114031f7492c43bd4a2d8ac576477"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"stream-json","version":"1.9.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"174bad53dbc866204461c098839905180f8ebb37c67cb997d2d8d8365bb64043"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"tough-cookie","version":"2.5.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b0350a189dad0bbc1ace4ea5c64c6a26895760c66986f90ab79a0f0e0c9fd70"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"csv-parse","version":"4.16.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea6198e68f4701e1ca71242f65c2a65391ce7fcf65ab9acb21fe2e495259dc21"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"request","version":"2.88.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97b67c3e8e4944a72dec2fa30b019ae56abc52b3d7b3e3309b2aed976717b2b5"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@protobufjs/utf8","version":"1.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bfa29af2452bdb2c19373d761688a4e5d99ba6215c4869c66468ee6ffcfae1f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"follow-redirects","version":"1.15.11","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"143a60cfb734690e8b973fcd43b986e49e7f212d37c38829eb2cac081786ca2f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"uuid","version":"3.4.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03ea7ca4dee9660fceaa16f350f8ee922521d10fb186767110a5e0ec48be9f75"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"uuid","version":"8.3.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"71014b6afd97c9f11129076c5e092924ac5b2497b60cb4c99a54487598526e19"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"elliptic","version":"6.6.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fe1f00e0e7daaeba3b50bba125ee5ca889bfc09812d9dc0ebe09abc938097bd"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D43","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a1cd284a720698a83c30672149875c2246969a6bd6f94c20fbdb4da82a24284"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"fs","version":"0.0.1-security","advisory":"MAL-2025-21003","reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"\u003Ccanvas\u003E without a text alternative: A \u003Ccanvas\u003E with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can\u0027t be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a955a5b723c416b74968e980673af264b6c4b6a99dee5dab483b3f88195bf50e"}},{"ruleId":"AC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"\u003Ccanvas\u003E without a text alternative: A \u003Ccanvas\u003E with no aria-label/title and no inner fallback content can\u0027t be described by assistive tech. Add a name or fallback content."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":106}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f9ad70acc249ebbb4702dd10633d62cd4648e531a8f437118a2fd65b36eec8e"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cbutton\u003E with no accessible text: A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/dashboard.js"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8cc6cef241de1dc725be7951735188233e5cc125d6163dfb38c1ac13844bc98b"}},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cbutton\u003E with no accessible text: A button with no text and no aria-label has no accessible name. Add visible text or an aria-label (an icon-only button still needs one)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":43}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61b5bd9d005d301ab51583796afe86f5c1ace7430ede3e27a9b04c8c19700bdd"}},{"ruleId":"AC3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Heading level jumps from h1 to h3: Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline assistive tech relies on. Don\u0027t jump levels \u2014 increase by at most one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34f7c100578b26ebf4f1a342c9648c81f6cd7c3d2076707747cc6dff67c425a7"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no a11y linter (an accessibility check that can read your UI \u2014 no component framework was detected and your pages are rendered by server-side templates, which neither the JSX/Vue ESLint plugins nor the HTML-template linters can parse; run axe/pa11y over the rendered pages, or assert the accessibility invariants over that rendered HTML in the test suite you already have) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start by running that check over your rendered pages in CI. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README omits the Rust MEV sniper project (jito Shred stream) entirely \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a9b5637c85756d65ad4b640e2a951fa57de536ef2050f1652d25bd9eb2dc4ce"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README omits the Node.js copy trading bot with gRPC dashboard and Telegram alerts \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ac0f119bd4161e8fc76d7b8afd0d8f8f113162cd6ac07a25a625960d1b32022"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README advertises a RAG / ML engine, but no ML/RAG code or dependency exists \u2014 searched for: \u0060rag\u0060, \u0060langchain\u0060, \u0060llamaindex\u0060, \u0060pinecone\u0060, \u0060weaviate\u0060, \u0060qdrant\u0060, \u0060embeddings\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"641c12de6a27c56ae4f356e613243d119d1728768480ea36e3ea12271e12b02c"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add cargo-audit / cargo-deny (or clippy) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No rollback/health safety: Deployment is orchestrated by compose, but no service declares a \u0060healthcheck:\u0060 and nothing pins a previous image to fall back to \u2014 the runtime can tell that the container is up, not that it is serving, so a bad release is harder to detect and reverse."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db6bab8a28a2145f47e5a4e6683cda39d2ba0296c723238e8057da979ae1c706"}},{"ruleId":"P5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No DR/backup evidence: A persistence guard (data volume / purge-protection) was found, but no backup, geo-recovery or RTO/RPO controls were evidenced \u2014 a volume that survives a container recreate is not a tested restore from catastrophic loss."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5daabb38c90b07af65b8738cf94ce884e90a7d8fef810d341de5c186188c8fe0"}},{"ruleId":"P7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Outbound HTTP without resilience: \u0060Client::new()\u0060 makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service\u0027s request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own \u2014 or never, for a client with no default timeout. 3 of the 5 files that make outbound calls are unbounded; the first 3 are listed."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/jito.rs"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcff504a37c169c1205390dad2048d51f7e3d5fe70fea6a318345195f699c2d5"}},{"ruleId":"P7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Outbound HTTP without resilience: \u0060Client::new()\u0060 makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service\u0027s request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own \u2014 or never, for a client with no default timeout."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"#_sniper (Rust) using jito Shred stream/src/services/zeroslot.rs"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"116f5354dddc4764fcf69385ba354208bd2b0c6c72e2e8fc47b112ee683df5d2"}},{"ruleId":"P7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Outbound HTTP without resilience: \u0060axios.post(\u0060 makes an outbound HTTP call, and nothing bounds it: no timeout, deadline, retry or circuit breaker is set for it here, and the client has no process-wide default. A slow or failing dependency will hold this service\u0027s request, thread or connection until the call gives up on its own \u2014 or never, for a client with no default timeout."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/services/notifications.js"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8362efc8c25a2c9783e3973e3499479210870ce990f0c4dee7710d7d285560e3"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 22 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js, 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js, 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/index.js, 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/main.js, 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js, 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap(offchain).js (\u002B16 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Forked directory tree (10 identical files, ~17978 lines \u00D7 2 trees): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/ and 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/ are near-verbatim copies of each other: 10 files are byte-identical under the same relative paths (~17978 lines; the trees hold 14 and 25 files). That is one structural fact, not 10 local ones: every edit made to one tree and not the other drifts silently, which is the failure whole-tree forks guarantee. Pick one tree as the single source and produce the other from it (generated, copied at build or release time, or re-exported) \u2014 or, if the copy is a stale snapshot nothing produces any more, delete it. Check first whether the copy is a deliberately published deliverable (a template consumers copy verbatim, a released sample frozen at a version); where it is, keep it produced from the source tree rather than edited in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15e19929ade284abce4396e90cbc6022ce1b4c243b459a3aa111fa7240a5320e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplication concentrated across 3 sibling directories (5 clone groups): 5 of the duplicated blocks reported below have copies in at least two of the sibling directories 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC, 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC, 3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket under the repository root. That concentration is one structural fact, not 5 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module \u2014 a common library every sibling imports \u2014 rather than 5 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b654e38da6bdfa434ae0855a47c1b79eeb1b0ae5ce5ac16f3220a7079fe5b55"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (182 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js:1 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js:1 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 182 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f10a876e846e5663e09bed60433eb38c179d87cf253de5ee25ba8b16362b3288"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (156 identical lines \u00D7 3 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js:1 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js:1 \u00B7 3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js:1 \u2014 these 3 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 156 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad7583b4b30f490eb0392bdb0eeaaa393a4809d400eeabb7cf47fcf90bba402c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (125 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js:1 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js:1 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 125 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60591fcfe6bd738d54e0c2e77f05bc2dfaf529ca4f0566800ca470102c172d12"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Wholesale file copy (95 identical lines \u00D7 2 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js:1 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js:1 \u2014 these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another \u2014 95 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them \u2014 so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) \u2014 the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9962a74918eb1eadfa1bfa2d94e93598cf4f6830c65cf6baa83d020365336b8f"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/index.js:97 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/main.js:75 \u2014 the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/index.js"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10e2f832dca484c46e21a0c8390d292940a47345d50ab29b0e624a98d72b44c8"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:69 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:114 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c36a3d3813f7152c2ed21d4faa54939ed4c3d7890fefb4fd6870ac54b310f205"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:88 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:105 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"791fdcb133d0ea29f77964ffe4a60db9b8d33124581b18a6f4fc1253827bdd61"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/services/notifications.js:136 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/services/notifications.js:148 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/services/notifications.js"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3c2bcaec36748d876b55ce77e180390bd1525605bc383c0629c1407c4e64a90"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js:109 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js:162 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2fab4e393fa3d83af522f27dde3766a50429838ffa7c1da30a7cd9a4e0986c9b"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:123 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js:141 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/server.js"},"region":{"startLine":123}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6da780dd34e7e3766e68fdfb0f01c817926c2be40c9bb827c971586100559f3a"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4 locations): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/main.js:9 \u00B7 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js:20 \u00B7 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js:20 \u00B7 3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js:21 \u2014 the 4 copies are spread across 4 files, and the CITED SPAN is a run of MODULE-LEVEL DECLARATIONS \u2014 bindings the module declares and exports \u2014 rather than statements with a call site. Do not read this as an extract-a-helper row: a call expression cannot stand where a declaration was, and putting one there would delete the names themselves, which are what the rest of the codebase imports. What actually repeats here is the INITIALISER \u2014 the same expression shape written once per binding. So give that expression one name (a small helper the initialisers call, or a shared base value they are each derived from) and keep every binding under the name it already has. Where the run is an enumeration \u2014 one binding per distinct thing, differing precisely in the thing each one names \u2014 the repetition IS the enumeration and collapsing it would delete entries; consider instead whether the set belongs in one exported table the individual names are read out of. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/main.js"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f97c592798ff4cd0af4916bcbd76b5b1f184ce39e01a9c1eefb3faf2bc4e8e9"}},{"ruleId":"R11","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Boundary violation [package:relative-cross-package]: 3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js:13 reaches into another package with a relative path (./logger.js) \u2014 import the package by name instead."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"adbb89c66ce1f0416087c967d89c5d994a294458dbea83c1e44f02e8603d5afa"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 28): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60f40d32f255e843a6a1e95a89eb1831aa4dc39d3f86f107187c89da95d06ab5"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 20, cognitive 28): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 20 and cognitive complexity 28; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2c42ed390af749b75aa37b306d881229dba17047d1f8e94f03fd485279c5acb"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function swap (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 25): swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f5bba5270c6631802193e8b5a7e8dc7048c5ac8da9b3780b0364416136e1ce5"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function swap (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 25): swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c00061f15d319273ee3793e77ac74e987c4289b08dd4eb27e6b99e29f070bb92"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function swap (cyclomatic 16, cognitive 25): swap has cyclomatic complexity 16 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"3_sniper bot(node) using using Helius websocket/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b17858a86345e7cb0adaaf12b89b33bf52db9cabe2b7576a11a111554d446e2d"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function getSplTokenBalance (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 12): getSplTokenBalance has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 12; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74b16b7d772337058338421fe4222899a95482dd5638611a46608df3fc9b4a09"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function getSplTokenBalance (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 12): getSplTokenBalance has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 12; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8d45957075ee9e354abb15476183f4958f9f60e6eb987af1badbd665f1e0a18"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function tOutPut (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 9): tOutPut has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 9; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36426f6a7dea7f94ebad334a3174108c4f595accf47138878758b20ba45ea388"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function tOutPut (cyclomatic 11, cognitive 9): tOutPut has cyclomatic complexity 11 and cognitive complexity 9; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/parsingtransaction.js"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"847c37a1acec21d2363c8aca0f27afaedc0f7a7ac6b0c0dd1f389736a9af9f6b"}},{"ruleId":"R4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Test Coverage: 0% of 22 production file(s) reachable from 0 test file(s) via the import graph \u2014 \u0027production\u0027 here is the RESIDUE: every source file left once tests, tooling, generated output, config, declarations and declaration-only modules, fixture corpora, type fixtures, behaviour-free data modules, re-export barrels, registration/constant data modules and service workers are set aside, so the percentage is taken over a smaller denominator than the workspace\u0027s file count"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64e0e3511eb969fb4720b196e7d3799e1714077217351c3c56a27b50e3e21220"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No test, lint or typecheck script: test \u2717 \u00B7 lint \u2717 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9372ffc30204d52cc3368af49ceaa995574db973935e30b3946f83785dea15b"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~7 LoC): no import path from any entry point (3 application, 0 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap(offchain).js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ad02fb9a935e5a91300b8d198f4c159b100ff2070cdf48257cd2de67eed0a2e"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Dead file (~7 LoC): no import path from any entry point (3 application, 0 tooling, 0 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it \u2014 nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap(offchain).js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a65a28d44e75e245dd390f84606935022ea86c3ea82af7d3510b78b82a9c47a2"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027checkWalletBalance\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eda3090cd8b4daab9d83620b4f22369b1e97bff43c6f5a3e05651f4413de6c61"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027MAX_RETRIES\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ad28da3837f8c9a36191c01c46d0cb53492c6077407846b0e28a8e7a8976888"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027getModuleConfig\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/config.js"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cbfa9e4f78b0e915096d52f1d9ceeb6297b87bc31667456e57f920326b9811f"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027default\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/config.js"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04d809c66e9d2379a2560727414ef0f52d04f4485becb8630ef9f0b559be6450"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027checkWalletBalance\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2734ebcee3b55c56df7fb18ed4d2d9d9981f6e4d5659fc6094f16553ef018d28"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027MAX_RETRIES\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3401d1decd0cabfaef84f303a68f2f35ac6a26e321c26cad0f8da17974889c0d"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logTrade\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f7a43b6ef07320514a0af968e821bd6d7127857fcbfa893ce2333a4ff6c5fdb"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logProfit\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7908425c91d9dbdd108877b6aa4df4796075c19d977f9fc9689c6abf1899926c"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logLoss\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"827cc3900d62f463cea0066250bce36332468f4864fb6048bba59261dc21c207"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logSuccess\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e1233c2d43c7c138c566ee11f5a777abdb701366fe023eb044e1a66e29ef768"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logPerformance\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f783e67d1acc29df8b656dff33a8285e3694377b90a563ec43eb31f4d788aa41"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logTradeExecution\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bac30ce847a346f86e5d4a2bf7c0a81bcfcb57fd0b0e8743e14fcb1ff86e91f7"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logError\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95f3a98ed9edde87a5a8eef6bbed6b14b69744baa025bbee47b0113cc32fd570"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logBalance\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":131}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acdd66224d91a3a6053b43d80269497680c0ad968f69bba5159fa71fd41204be"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logPosition\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcb63ed5ca7cd78ec9fbea365fe2a5a632ea654a6e6405af5bba993fc6d7c029"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logConfig\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d204b086053f6b51ec50bcc6f011e8800741d3cbc0156c731c6db468e010863d"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logApiRequest\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4c14b17fc4a1c919c0d451faabbbc34fedf4015e4ee50b367fae7fe1b305c1b"}},{"ruleId":"R7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Unused export \u0027logApiResponse\u0027: Nothing imports this binding \u2014 it is safe to review for removal."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/utils/logger.js"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f412d7164374674d1b7777293c67ccd4672f0151a23cd8dbb42b69a5171d054"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@degenfrends/solana-rugchecker\u0027: Declared in 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf5a29163dcfeb88d1dfef6dbebbfee35786595682d3164f3bb47216d46b2b7b"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@pump-fun/pump-sdk\u0027: Declared in 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"69880eb4448db7181e7810fc0ef7943b6b499bcf930b40632a5a25838cbd7c5a"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Unused dependency \u0027@pump-fun/pump-swap-sdk\u0027: Declared in 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members \u2014 no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2a5af4141684905258ce9900d5049e656da151ee336971f598018a3c9078d4c"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js \u2192 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js \u2192 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3de0b393b70905155b2664a9ff07ff58cffe71da503666d4716f411d09e470a1"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js \u2192 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/main.js \u2192 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7326935eae8eb2064f07265b1aecb89809822756985c969051eaef0b03284464"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js \u2192 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/swap.js \u2192 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be368af918abe6a94f7b4bb59151e9bf283ae00de96bf684152c61d2acfe568f"}},{"ruleId":"R9","level":"error","message":{"text":"Import cycle (2 files): 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js \u2192 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/main.js \u2192 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c955a578312e46c771e5cd6c66150273ea128949b5c4c96cc071f41f86b4428"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Third-party script without Subresource Integrity: \u0060https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/chart.js\u0060 is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request \u2014 the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path \u2014 runs arbitrary script in this page\u0027s origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time \u2014 the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/dashboard/public/index.html"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30ccc5fb2762d9329108ea2e1f03fced68a7bb8111056141f48f683c1143ab7c"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060err.message \u0026\u0026 err.message.includes(\u0022Invalid param\u0022)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js, 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07814123d9dde69464024ce0ea03ae27f856b133986abd69ad5be37bfa53b2a3"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060err.name === \u0022TokenAccountNotFoundError\u0022 || (err.message \u0026\u0026 ( err.message.includes(\u0022Failed to find account\u0022) || err.message.includes(\u0022Accoun\u2026\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js, 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/fuc.js"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b85703b2aa588d12aab8c68ef634b0b9c50271ae45b08f746848d519216a3151"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060typeof log === \u0022string\u0022 \u0026\u0026 log.toLowerCase().includes(\u0022instruction: mintto\u0022)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js, 2_copy trading bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"1_solana sniper bot(node) using gRPC/grpc.js"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"388978dd961a59797be8965a8ee97e19b06bc9ff189141ac573b54c278f421b8"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":50,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}