{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"R1","name":"Type Safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Type Safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R1"},{"id":"R10","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R10"},{"id":"R2","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R2"},{"id":"R3","name":"Large Files","shortDescription":{"text":"Large Files"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R3"},{"id":"R4","name":"Test Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R4"},{"id":"R5","name":"Dependency Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R5"},{"id":"R6","name":"Tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R6"},{"id":"R7","name":"Dead Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Dead Code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R7"},{"id":"R8","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R8"},{"id":"R9","name":"Circular Imports","shortDescription":{"text":"Circular Imports"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/R9"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_grabArticle (cyclomatic 118): _grabArticle has cyclomatic complexity 118 (threshold 15). Of this number, 106 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 12 belong to 4 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1041}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b54032b63dede62f9eff4384f5cff074fd11da9b8a030e1c822447c5c30af89"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_getJSONLD (cyclomatic 36): _getJSONLD has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 36 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1663, 1677, 1701, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1658}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85ead89d7b4b829d2ae34a3e19c82f829e316bd3e0b21d95359cafc1af0782f7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_getArticleMetadata (cyclomatic 35): _getArticleMetadata has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). Of this number, 28 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 7 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1783}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66f65b85fb89ffb6204507b1ef515df5c522755b826d25151a77557ac3f8a701"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_cleanConditionally::(anonymous)::shouldRemoveNode (cyclomatic 25): _cleanConditionally::(anonymous)::shouldRemoveNode has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2581}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c9c660f479219ed705fcf1e642db3437e7d4bc2353b4a6946eefbe7d1d73e88"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_fixLazyImages (cyclomatic 24): _fixLazyImages has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 24 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 2361). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d632df428d246cee32147cf1c5e8839c8024f045092b15ba00d4cc81c6af10b6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Readability.Readability (cyclomatic 22): Readability.Readability has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 6 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e1f8ffd5ea182a4fdc8c517f5966fdb7940c302ef6e2100e071dd5b448512fc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_insertNodesAtIndex (cyclomatic 21): _insertNodesAtIndex has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":362}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1801ffd7a4bf6d82a15f115fb6bb440479c0270948fc2b0b416e6fd20cc1f95d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_unwrapNoscriptImages (cyclomatic 18): _unwrapNoscriptImages has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 18 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1943, 1922). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file\u0027s highest cyclomatic complexity: _initializeNode (cyclomatic 20) is higher and carries no row of its own \u2014 it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension\u0027s figures nor in its score. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Readability.js holds 6 of the 9 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 166 of the 181 points over it (92%), 20.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (JSDOMParser.js at 8). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1918}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61dd34280e1ebb8f02bf410e1989b6be54cb395e60a038afd82e21bc70ab8ef8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"readNode (cyclomatic 17): readNode has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3ed8f63af974c40f40f1a3b31dd5bab35e46e65f0ccc6f5a7d73587abb6b2c7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_grabArticle (cognitive 272): _grabArticle has cognitive complexity 272 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 62 (171 pts), loops 18 (66 pts), boolean chains 27, ternaries 3 (7 pts), other 1 (nesting depth added 161). Of this number, 250 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 22 belong to 4 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1041}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24d7f27c65992d7255563e55ce2d2efed9d5752bbae25ce48c86460c010e8c5f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_getJSONLD (cognitive 50): _getJSONLD has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (32 pts), boolean chains 15, error handling 1 (2 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 16). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 50 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1663, 1677, 1701, \u2026). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1658}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a3072a9a3bbf4c3a5d79ed48754f36b161875ba20d61570d00f2ae88287d72e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_fixLazyImages (cognitive 35): _fixLazyImages has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (26 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 14). None of this is in the body itself: all 35 points belong to one function literal inside it that branches (line 2361). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c02aca2a296237ee06f2fbe5a629e7ebbf1e637b3cd979f4fc7abe92867a734"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_insertNodesAtIndex (cognitive 31): _insertNodesAtIndex has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), ternaries 6 (9 pts), loops 5 (7 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":362}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"825a447f47e94b1af35f70d7ee6ddb6482a71a47304b2ade3e1f6bc9ecbeaa4b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Readability (cognitive 28): Readability has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 13, if/else 8 (12 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). Of this number, 14 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 14 belong to 7 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1878a977c13be40ca7b9a908cf2929abb5c323e944062ac29a0b0b8a551f8efd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_unwrapNoscriptImages (cognitive 27): _unwrapNoscriptImages has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (20 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 14). None of this is in the body itself: all 27 points belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1943, 1922). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals\u0027 work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1918}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a46f6ee89ac28799a59a4a22103a2a3600dd2a6fb5281b18037b368eab3c3165"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_replaceBrs (cognitive 21): _replaceBrs has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (13 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 10). None of this is in the body itself: all 21 points belong to one function literal inside it that branches (line 707). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":706}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3349c1a3c9df5b6e5b2dc1d0b97df201d4b5444df5392157f06a9f89cae26079"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"readNode (cognitive 20): readNode has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (18 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b111d9fb0327ba7028352e6b7b65cac79376bb775dc67a05b2f149e895248b67"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_fixRelativeUris (cognitive 20): _fixRelativeUris has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), loops 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 6). None of this is in the body itself: all 20 points belong to 4 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 476, toAbsoluteURI, a function literal at line 512, \u2026). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals\u0027 work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal\u0027s work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":457}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a7945863c56f605683b1c344a23edb1931602d29b1c509dd3d111329c61edf9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_markDataTables (cognitive 20): _markDataTables has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5c1244cd5638ae779a0736d242c3b26e894a5d4139b863de99654e753508d6d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_getArticleTitle (cognitive 19): _getArticleTitle has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), boolean chains 3, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":573}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29df152c39be0f383e6d1403e4df09923bca79d2ee8b5eef4eaba307c69e737e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_cleanConditionally::(anonymous)::shouldRemoveNode (cognitive 19): _cleanConditionally::(anonymous)::shouldRemoveNode has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 9. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2581}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"981300c9477d10c3ec4561808d093cc509456f650a22f1e70f152868b38ed4e3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"makeElementNode (cognitive 17): makeElementNode has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1045}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26e254ac3bcfe0a7a1e752e506528cc839b41f336659627d0186d5cca93abbee"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"innerHTML::getHTML (cognitive 16): innerHTML::getHTML has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (7 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":751}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7699654b35dd0d0bc0628d50a9fcf56ef98cc72f5515e1ea188bacf2509f0fce"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_getArticleMetadata (cognitive 16): _getArticleMetadata has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (8 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 2). Of this number, 8 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 8 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1783}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4131913e135e62af499ce4161468d1d925ef73e04ba1f0b793959ff71dbe0f2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Readability.js: FileTooLong \u2014 1499 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 999 over it, 3.00\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20ebd7fc6bf8dc4547591db30ff4dd6817bb56ad3f9de33c9357888653f76182"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: JSDOMParser.js: FileTooLong \u2014 812 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 312 over it, 1.62\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82b05690049ad27266560ee5ca5ec98acf14459b60d51f4686677a92b8e48dc5"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 JavaScript/TypeScript suite: Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured \u2014 the repository root runs mocha but declares no coverage provider, so the suite can run and still produce no lcov \u2014 add \u0060c8\u0060 (or \u0060nyc\u0060) as a devDependency so the suite can be wrapped for coverage. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. The named suite step is one the repository\u0027s maintainers can perform; once it passes, the real number is measured on the next scan. Alternatively, commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and it is read without a re-run."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deprecated: eslint: eslint 8.57.0, declared in package.json, is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options.\u0022. Replace it with the package or version that message names, or record why this one must stay."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package.json"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e04d6fe6ca46e7c5138acb9303f34c05bf26af5e4732d5aadfd02868b07841a1"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Deprecated: sinon: sinon 14.0.2, declared in package.json, is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u002216.1.1\u0022. Replace it with the package or version that message names, or record why this one must stay."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package.json"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b512873203732119bba145c8c1f658c19e994751afaddbb23fe80ac2670b6013"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Deprecated: @humanwhocodes/config-array: @humanwhocodes/config-array 0.11.14 is resolved in package-lock.json and is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022Use @eslint/config-array instead\u0022. This repository does not declare it \u2014 a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3367f047ca48a2f4bbec028d1037c4158644375cb7f4ff97dea0a73eca0b3a1"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Deprecated: @humanwhocodes/object-schema: @humanwhocodes/object-schema 2.0.3 is resolved in package-lock.json and is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022Use @eslint/object-schema instead\u0022. This repository does not declare it \u2014 a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16783e478c5e2496ef49cbd939acc4ed3bce191a6c2ac6202c1a08e7b956a7ef"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Deprecated: @types/parse-path: @types/parse-path 7.1.0 is resolved in package-lock.json and is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022This is a stub types definition. parse-path provides its own type definitions, so you do not need this installed.\u0022. This repository does not declare it \u2014 a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":874}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53d30364bacf7c6e2ae6a4256b4f8f5431764af4b550b6ab8cc1d1d9c9101c65"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Deprecated: glob: glob 8.1.0 is resolved in package-lock.json and is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting [e-mail redacted]\u0022. This repository does not declare it \u2014 a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":2928}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a6a21a0f511e79bf1641d8781e0ca2d1a227ed4ef5f1fd822135ca3108ada0d"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Deprecated: glob: glob 10.5.0 is resolved in package-lock.json and is marked deprecated by its publisher: \u0022Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting [e-mail redacted]\u0022. This repository does not declare it \u2014 a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package-lock.json"},"region":{"startLine":4116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9af59a68b703d1d09f733b4123d502871e54cb862646e84770d19bbb5c4c04c9"}},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3f6581d15f515f6fecb337baffd04078661409163fe4a33dcfb9de599a0927b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D13","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6bc1c25160f77e83ef93a2cfa71c8447406ad612e1f5eda208b9a3e7a3daab2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f19ee62a31bba465cbf775a0074d8be77951d81b454aa867d454fa5cac0e1df"},"properties":{"commitSha":"81fac1abb2e5503c8b4da49e6632b6ebc8d7cb09"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-540","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20f6a5e1f78f5d89ae30f42053ccc1acf6e9fd0a3e19994c614f7379ef1bdeb4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-125","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb354110d4b9e8b10e4103c9441c209949e03ab05dbabeaa342188f4dfcd03a4"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"basic-ftp","version":"5.3.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b970e01cddfb1a1190320d278ac50909b0e4b001906793af255fd1ae41e6c2a4"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"1.1.11","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d94d234417f60ff1227350e25e05cd7716244120e07e1992dc5630073c057671"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"2.0.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6075f60096325610f10537e493a4baafd7f8304e6f5dab6a9d9caf724a124fe8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"5.1.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59e28f0fc3ceb219b9638eae73d38b2bcb54c3283507449da6396114e6cfcf26"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ip-address","version":"10.2.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a31a0b5364830f542d37385755d27dd90f97746286a80cb6c17836bc6e14179"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"js-yaml","version":"4.3.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e405d2494dbc637e4473f16879796d9e7d926d1f2cce7028a0abf9fe27f769f8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"minimatch","version":"3.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5663b5d3983a9f6f7744b9af8d10ede9d273d65b8a859266b06bf516fc0e4e27"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"brace-expansion","version":"2.1.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8f0d92c2ef7b82bb7e52325daa4cb2b1dbc14b013940332eed15e39c28f8a03"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"path-to-regexp","version":"1.8.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87839f7289af0999d94a99db6eefa4a0c9cb8f6ea36e8599abd5bd35ced532c8"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"serialize-javascript","version":"6.0.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6532f69593dd3d2ea46577ad478f1657ba969b6919f855a6261cf5feb9c06e85"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"undici","version":"7.28.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a6c8aec811a2d7ca01dc30175c7ce3e9ebf8b9d90e6e0e2ae64d2e9773685b6"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"ajv","version":"6.12.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"febb75adddc80350fadf4dc0d046a26cc1dd1687a68dd6dd8f31c814caa96440"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"diff","version":"5.2.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aeada2921803747dbf9c7765872e4d001bbfbb51931279be8b9119acd687d6b1"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"diff","version":"7.0.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7e7e18ab73b678a9245b47c273c5b3ae7c327cd2facf4a64a858eb709929cfb"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2db1784cdbfa40de8aee951b758403d34f841e6e1e6e82e23c9d6db8c0dd71fc"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further orphaned files (smaller): 1 smaller file(s) also have no living knowledge \u2014 folded into the freshness score and metrics rather than raised one row each \u2014 most significant first: Readability-readerable.js (3 orphaned of 3 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 3 of the 6 production source files in this repository met that bar). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability-readerable.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d97bd14532f63db7eeba8f97009dfb29034e9cb0f4a8d8720d308d5c20aae598"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s mixed at the repository root with everything else the repository holds, so nothing marks which files are the product."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s javascript-typescript pack, \u0060semgrep --config=p/javascript\u0060, or eslint-plugin-security \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No dependency-update automation: \u0060package.json\u0060 declares packages, and nothing in the repository keeps them current: no Dependabot or Renovate configuration that schedules updates, and no dependency-review gate on pull requests. A pinned dependency stays at the version it was added at until someone notices \u2014 including after an advisory is published against it. Add a \u0060.github/dependabot.yml\u0060 with one \u0060package-ecosystem\u0060 entry per ecosystem the tree uses (or an enabled \u0060renovate.json\u0060), and gate pull requests with \u0060actions/dependency-review-action\u0060."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"package.json"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b237f7efe841e3a95b381b232502a3a473094adeb069a11eaca8ca533fb1c34"}},{"ruleId":"R1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Type Safety: 0 typed \u00B7 10 plain JS \u2014 the untyped files are JSDOMParser.js, Readability-readerable.js, Readability.js, index.js, test/debug-testcase.js, test/generate-testcase.js (\u002B4 more)."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d00ee7953f55325a823d27e5db9657c80ca9b9861c0c0abf8fe487cd3fa586d3"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2 locations): JSDOMParser.js:379 \u00B7 JSDOMParser.js:426 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":379}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26e5ddcbfb663ba1cedac8933e3f8a02119d80cb630d75e4ab30ef4cd0374d59"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2 locations): JSDOMParser.js:59 \u00B7 Readability.js:1637 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"234bffb42752839691adb3249d2db32d3e7a973e0381f8d4eadf09055862aa2e"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block with local edits (9 matched lines \u00D7 2 locations): JSDOMParser.js:991 \u00B7 JSDOMParser.js:1176 \u2014 the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited \u2014 72 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both spans, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row\u0027s finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters \u2014 or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":991}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"80e50b050db832d9c499bd8c0702cddccc32cf8c051050df845027921296230c"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2 locations): Readability-readerable.js:33 \u00B7 Readability.js:2724 \u2014 the 2 copies sit in sibling files in one directory, so check first whether one of them (or an existing module there) already owns this behaviour and the others should call it; otherwise extract it into one module in that directory and have each site call it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability-readerable.js"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3824c1ec403116bb47911d8e58afb64c7c63398787ee9a1a6413acd42a9ecdb2"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2 locations): Readability.js:2176 \u00B7 Readability.js:2187 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae74023b669d6bce57e027da869ec432161322ded5d61385f8365eb7e1ee50ed"}},{"ruleId":"R10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2 locations): Readability.js:2269 \u00B7 Readability.js:2279 \u2014 all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block \u2014 it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead \u2014 the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in \u2014 and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc3450ad02981b2660e1190eeef54651f8771dcc108ba71eac2397c2b89e2ce7"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _grabArticle (cyclomatic 106, cognitive 250): _grabArticle has cyclomatic complexity 106 and cognitive complexity 250; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1041}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e1e82904681eac9fee39b2ee322597154343b32258123ef64ca5d3af20c2b3a"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 32, cognitive 46): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 46; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1663}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f0d66ab8c70ca9ccd5ec07a24cc8cdfbb48beccc3b099f2ea7fead4e71d2c68"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function shouldRemoveNode (cyclomatic 25, cognitive 19): shouldRemoveNode has cyclomatic complexity 25 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth \u2014 arms side by side rather than stacked \u2014 and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2581}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57be9b17261d2ff262866873d80d7503daa0fbbc6b39e8b4ae8823f6c8f046db"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 24, cognitive 35): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 24 and cognitive complexity 35; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2361}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abc39ef8eb433953a7b997f9046e236ab2e1ba4e77197fbe71ae4bc35b134ec2"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 22, cognitive 38): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 22 and cognitive complexity 38; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2470}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f0ecff6e7a654fc057136e2924f0c3bc2f237fce855c3fa9fe55b25dca6b917"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _insertNodesAtIndex (cyclomatic 21, cognitive 31): _insertNodesAtIndex has cyclomatic complexity 21 and cognitive complexity 31; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":362}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32cd2b02ae038b8685e3acb072a9b517cd1b1dc2ba191c0567ffb9981fe18ec4"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function readNode (cyclomatic 17, cognitive 20): readNode has cyclomatic complexity 17 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b17676ec7993afe46629e782a8995918aaa365e4cf55b84c17733cf15ed0b037"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _getArticleTitle (cyclomatic 15, cognitive 19): _getArticleTitle has cyclomatic complexity 15 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":573}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d7938defbff1e1de97a8fc2f8acce988aba15b38ec7566a3543d47fe7323197"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 14, cognitive 29): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 14 and cognitive complexity 29; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"test/test-jsdomparser.js"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c52c103c528ea449976d66c89282d00b291b3e6d4072cce92a1a0379b4c9e0a2"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function makeElementNode (cyclomatic 14, cognitive 17): makeElementNode has cyclomatic complexity 14 and cognitive complexity 17; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1045}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60c1378beebacdc892fa7f318cedd4f35b801c07082a43c71ed53afc6ea82121"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function Readability (cyclomatic 14, cognitive 14): Readability has cyclomatic complexity 14 and cognitive complexity 14; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c937a04701a752b60b32cf28f1cc2a9ed4d5568ae0961dea7c2c3b76263f6bc1"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function _markDataTables (cyclomatic 13, cognitive 20): _markDataTables has cyclomatic complexity 13 and cognitive complexity 20; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":2297}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a5292497edbe071b98efc9faf7683ef8a38e91a66071f857f3bbb8f4dcbc879"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 22): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 22; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1943}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d5b52e898e74c55abd125711e1fcca145c0542a8138e2c0d11936b4ba561a76"}},{"ruleId":"R2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Complex function (anonymous) (cyclomatic 12, cognitive 21): (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 12 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side \u2014 extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository\u0027s own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":707}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbc6d5ee8c6ce174186db3313d3aa3573a5589cefe3490cc65fd437d33f6a3ca"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Readability.js: 2520 lines of code: Readability.js has 2520 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3b4329ae9892fb7fe061eacedfab9b48cf7356ef25779949dd9be51681d4cd9"}},{"ruleId":"R3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"JSDOMParser.js: 1166 lines of code: JSDOMParser.js has 1166 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic \u2014 a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ba48526cb6dd502deb5834fe7e34836f6022d5487b25110620af23d48f3c8f0"}},{"ruleId":"R6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No typecheck script: test \u2713 \u00B7 lint \u2713 \u00B7 typecheck \u2717 \u2014 read from this repository\u0027s package.json scripts and corroborated against its CI workflows. A script counts when its name or command matches the step: \u0060test\u0060 for the suite, \u0060lint\u0060 or \u0060prettier\u0060 for linting, \u0060typecheck\u0060/\u0060type-check\u0060/\u0060tsc\u0060 for type checking. \u2717 therefore means no script or CI step under those names was found, NOT that the step is absent from your pipeline \u2014 a task invoked by a runner this check does not read, or named something else entirely, is not seen and is worth confirming before acting on a cross. A \u2713 means the wiring is DECLARED \u2014 a script or CI step under those names exists. It is not a statement that the step passes, or that it runs at all: nothing here installs a dependency or executes a suite."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"912edc7f1fd20bf80ef68c3293e3048565115e48707dc5f9d492201598794658"}},{"ruleId":"R8","level":"error","message":{"text":"Unlisted import \u0027globals\u0027: Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json \u2014 installs work only by hoisting accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"eslint.config.mjs"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"139e7d63c0d04d4cc57c359cf9be0736c8caf5981679dfd8c44b656e2a8b63ec"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060num == 0 || num \u003E 0x10ffff || (num \u003E= 0xd800 \u0026\u0026 num \u003C= 0xdfff)\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 JSDOMParser.js, Readability.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24aa5244542af9047757f88cf3eca0e2e1a9fd32fee344107363dbbc0ae0ad5c"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060this.html.substring(this.currentChar,this.html.length)\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5faf84c45985547676a94963a5b9413e54b2d06a668fb782c70f5488bccd3118"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060this.html.substring(this.currentChar,n)\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":1188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07779f17fd28f1323e8c27d08812fdd55bedc92e2300097363ececd719bdd1e1"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060pageCacheHtml\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1575}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"883a3e2195ec5fdbd7f05a0f1dfaa525b12ace161bf6a4c5d996544d16e8f9a4"}},{"ruleId":"X24","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Untrusted text written into markup unescaped: \u0060noscript.innerHTML\u0060 is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through \u0060innerHTML\u0060 with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework\u0027s escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":1954}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a66e17866fbeb61a7e543a6d748634e43bf5c732903ffd4a5f7c343441ca8c3c"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JSDOMParser.js"},"region":{"startLine":673}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c5030e3a0df0b6b72f0356bc66134c4c6264f33cd941ab25a4d3f42b0dbca0d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":469}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ea773bf54d65557f9c4bf711c4f27b86834985fb23164b80cbbf8239cd1d2fd"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (empty catch): An empty catch block silently discards the error \u2014 failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don\u0027t catch it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Readability.js"},"region":{"startLine":587}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad4f2a4d94102578cf9f446912e583983f6c25680d9703888667fc4b4c7e1ecc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-125","guid":"98717707-96bf-ca5b-9568-8d1d257574c1","name":"CWE-125","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-125"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-540","guid":"1a9db5db-e5bb-ae5d-935a-d1b4e9ee080b","name":"Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/540.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A01:2025","guid":"df693558-c822-0452-8f7b-4d53cb6bcc59","name":"Broken Access Control","shortDescription":{"text":"Broken Access Control"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A01_2025-Broken_Access_Control/"},{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":19,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}