Public report of nank1ro/flutter-shadcn-ui, published 23 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 23 October 2026, 14:42 UTC · Survey ID cd_17b4c9739baf49cf927c48bd75608d48
nank1ro/flutter-shadcn-ui
Measured 23 October 2026, 14:25 UTC, at code version 4fe5440
No regression since the last survey
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
CAI scoreAdequate
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Up 1 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 46,335 lines of product code in 4 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.4 person-years · Weakest lens: Production Readiness, 47
Findings by how serious they are
6 critical249 serious43 minor
11 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
23 October 2026, 14:25 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
58of 61 dimensions measured by tools. The other 3 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
283of 298 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 15 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
61dimensions across 6 lenses, read from 46,335 lines of product code in 4 projects.
nank1ro/flutter-shadcn-ui scores 61 out of 100 and is rated Adequate, while four of its six lenses score higher still: Performance at 100, Architecture at 91 and Code Health at 89, all rated Exemplary, and Security and Compliance at 79, rated Adequate. The project hasn't declared a stable release yet, so its lenses are rated against a lower bar than a released product's, while the score itself is worked out as for any repository.
The score is lower than those four because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Production Readiness, which scores 47 and is rated Adequate. Its Observability dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Production Readiness can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality and to adopt `package:logging` (or `package:logger`) and log at meaningful points in the apps and servers you run, and if Production Readiness rose to 70, the score would rise from 61 to about 69.
Six findings are critical: five in Static Analysis (SAST) and one in Change Coupling.
Watchdog couldn't measure 10 dimensions in this code, among them Code Coverage, Test Reliability and Dependency Hygiene, so they are left out of the score. The product code is 46,335 lines, which would take an estimated 0.4 person-years, around €60,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 2 findings
These 2 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 9 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €60,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€20,000 to €100,000, for 331 to 1,051 hours of work, about 0.4 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.8 at a score of 61. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 46,335 lines of product code
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Raises the score by about 7 points · Low effort · ADR Quality
2
Adopt `package:logging` (or `package:logger`) and log at meaningful points in the apps and servers you run.
Raises the score by about 8 points · Medium effort · Observability
3
Record your significant design decisions.
Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €60,000 to build again, about 0.4 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Production Readiness, at 47 (Weak). Production Readiness is about whether the product is ready to run in production and to change without breaking. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Production Readiness also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Production Readiness grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Production Readiness actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 7 points for low effort, because it clears the 1 ADR Quality findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 7.5 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 2% to 5% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 1,395 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 5,658 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 0.3 to 1.9 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Code Duplication · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
Architecture — module dependency graph
Project dependencies, layered top-to-bottom; arrows show direction. Any dashed red edge points upward or sideways — a layering smell or cycle. A clean layered graph has none.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
5 modules, with 1 dependency between them. Every module uses only modules listed above it, so there are no loops.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
repository.pages uses repository.src, so a change to repository.src can break repository.pages, while a change to repository.pages can't break repository.src.
Position
Below the diagonal: repository.pages uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
9
Medium
A05:2025 — Injection
8
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, implement structured logging across all applications and servers to establish baseline observability. Second, document significant design decisions in a dedicated ADR folder to improve architectural transparency. Third, integrate static analysis and security linting into the CI pipeline to prevent regressions. Finally, restrict public API surfaces by hiding internal implementation types to ensure safe library evolution.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Keep implementation types off the public surface (Dart: a `_` name, or keep it under `lib/src/` unexported) so internals can change without breaking consumers.
Set security response headers on the surface this repository serves: an `add_header` directive per header in the nginx/Caddy/Apache config, a `_headers` / `vercel.json` / `netlify.toml` entry for a static host, or `helmet()` in the HTTP server. `Content-Security-Policy` is the one that pays for itself first — it is what contains an injected script once one reaches the page — followed by `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` and a frame policy (`X-Frame-Options: DENY`, or CSP `frame-ancestors`). Where the app is served from a build container, the header configuration belongs in the image beside the built assets, so it ships with them rather than depending on where it lands.
Make sure a person approves each release. The release job names an environment, but its approval rules live in the code host's settings, where Watchdog can't see them. Check that a reviewer must approve each release, or publish releases as drafts first, so a bad build can be stopped before anyone downloads it.
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 6
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 249
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 43
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 11
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 58 of 61 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 61 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 283 of 298 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: test source is present (.dart) but the built-in coverage collector has no runner for this repository's ecosystem — so this suite was never executed by it. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a defect in the repo. To have real coverage read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.dart) but the built-in reliability runner does not support this repository's ecosystem, so flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This repository's dependency manifests (a Dart pubspec.yaml and package.json) were found, but this pass cannot parse them for hygiene, so no package was assessed. Zero packages read is NOT a clean dependency tree, so this is NOT SCORED — a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. This row is about dependency HYGIENE — outdated, deprecated or unmaintained direct dependencies; known CVEs in the same dependency graph are a separate question, reported under D30 wherever the manifest is OSV-readable.
D14 License Compliance — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This repository declares package.json, but the licence verdict published here was taken over its pub package dependencies. Nothing was read about its npm dependencies' licensing in either direction, and a clean score on this card must not be read as covering them.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (53 contributor(s) across 762 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 87% of the history; the other 52 hold 0.2% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is a COLLECTOR gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (pubspec.yaml), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here, so this ecosystem's public API has no collector, and the remedy is to write one — no change to the scan image can close it.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection registrations in C# and Spring beans in Java/Kotlin only, and this repository's container is disco, whose lifetimes are not modelled yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via DevServer (dev). the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
P8 Schema migrations — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads EF Core usage in C# and the schema tooling its file scan recognises only, and no .NET project was loaded, and this repository's language is not one the scan models, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Scala, Ruby and Python source only, and no C# was loaded and no JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Scala, Ruby or Python was found in this repository, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and Java, Kotlin, Scala, Go, Swift, Python and Ruby source only, and no C# was loaded, no Java, Kotlin, Scala, Go, Swift, Python or Ruby was found, and this repository's Lua is not read yet, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
AX9 CQS / query purity: Handlers are found by interface/name convention — a query handler using neither is not seen. Mutation is a resolved write/publish invocation (SaveChanges/repository/bus), so a write hidden behind a hand-rolled wrapper, reflection, or a string-keyed service locator resolves to a non-persistence type and isn't flagged; it detects that a query writes state, not whether the write is a legitimate read-side cache update. Clean means "no resolved write/publish in a query body", not a proof of CQS purity.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
23 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was _ShadCalendarState.build at 87. A further 3 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being ShadToasterState.build at 17 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score. 2 files carry no cyclomatic complexity row at all for this reason — every one of their over-threshold methods was excluded, so the exclusion is disclosed nowhere in the file itself: lib/src/components/toast.dart (ShadToasterState.build at 17), lib/src/components/sonner.dart (ShadSonnerState.build at 16). They are named here because the per-file figures other dimensions report are taken BEFORE this exclusion, so such a file can show a high maximum complexity elsewhere in this report and nothing here, with nothing to reconcile the two.
+ 18 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 1 body over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with _ShadCalendarState.build (cyclomatic 87). — Refactoring it lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 6.3 to about 6.7/10.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 21 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 2 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with _ShadCalendarState.build (cognitive 115), ShadResizableController.resize (cognitive 66). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 2 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 5.8 to about 6.5/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes6.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 31 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with date_picker.dart (5), sheet.dart (2), toast.dart (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (31 warning-level).
Resolve the 14 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with select.dart (2), calendar.dart, sheet.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart, default_theme_variant.dart, calendar.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
108 duplicated block group(s) detected. A further 5 rows report members as variants of one another; they aggregate block groups already counted above and are not themselves counted. 16 of the 113 are in trees this repository does not ship — vendored, example/demo, fixture and benchmark code — and are ranked below the shipped groups rather than excluded from them: the duplication there is real and is still counted in this dimension's score. The dimensions that publish a production-file census leave those trees out of theirs, so this count is deliberately drawn over the wider population.
+ 52 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 8 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart (8). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 warning-level).
Resolve the 6 Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with checkbox.dart (2), tabs.dart, calendar.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Resolve the 6 Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart (5), date_picker_form_field.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (6 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling7.3 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
3 production modules (pub), 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on module(s). Read from the build's own module declarations; 1 module(s) off the main sequence, with abstractness counted on 2 of the 3 (the rest declare no modelled class or interface, export only macros, declare types in source no model reads, or have no source directory of their own).
Off the main sequence: shadcn_ui
What to do
Resolve the 1 Off the main sequence finding(s) in Coupling. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Coupling in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 14 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with select.dart (3), input.dart, calendar.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (14 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 59 resolved pub package(s) use a banned license. Licences were read from pub.dev's analysis of each package's licence file. ★ This repository commits no pubspec.lock (Dart's guidance for a package), so the graph was closed here: the 13 package(s) its pubspec declares under dependencies, and transitively every package their published pubspecs declare, each at the newest release its constraint admits — the release a fresh `pub get` picks wherever constraints agree; where two disagree the first to reach the package was taken. dev_dependencies are not part of it. The packages the `flutter`, `flutter_localizations` SDK itself pins are the toolchain's and were not reached. pub.dev analyses only recent releases, so for 1 package(s) locked at an older version the licence read is that of the package's latest analysed release, not of the locked one. ★ COVERAGE OF THIS VERDICT: it grades this repository's pub package dependencies and nothing else. The repository also declares package.json, and the licences of those dependencies were NOT read by this pass — a gap in this engine's coverage, not a statement about them. So this result says the graded closure carries no banned licence; it does NOT say this repository's licensing is clear.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
0 deducted task-comment markers across 46335 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository's root README (Flutter ShadcnUI) is clear and well-structured: it states the project name, license, stars, issues, pub version badge, a Buy Me A Coffee link, and an overview of what the library does. It also links to documentation at mariuti.com, adds Agent Skills install commands, Progress tracking, and a full outline (Documentation; Agent Skills; Progress; FAQs; Star History). The docs/README is a standalone README for the starlight starter kit, covering installation, project structure, commands, and an extensive Theme/data doc. All documents are well-organized with headings and the outline present.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
1 of 4 build units (npm, pub) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
8 finding(s): 0 critical, 5 high, 3 medium, 0 low. 1 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 10 file(s) — `lib/src/i18n/as.i18n.yaml`, `lib/src/i18n/bn.i18n.yaml`, `lib/src/i18n/he.i18n.yaml`, `lib/src/i18n/ka.i18n.yaml`, `lib/src/i18n/km.i18n.yaml`, … (+5 more) — so no absence of findings in them is evidence of anything, and nothing in them was analysed. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 1 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
+ 1 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
13 of 94 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is lib/src/components/breadcrumb.dart. Counted over 94 of the 139 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Resolve the 13 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with breadcrumb.dart (2), generate_skills.dart, neutral.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (13 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Orphaned files with no living knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 1 Boundary-crossing change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with input.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart, input.dart, textarea.dart. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
+ 3 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 1 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether read (query) handlers stay side-effect-free — a query that writes persistent state or raises events breaks CQS and makes reads unsafe to retry, cache, or route to a read replica.
Method: Roslyn scan: CQRS handlers classified query-vs-command by interface (IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler<TQuery,TResult>) and name convention (*Query/Get*/Find* vs *Command); each query handler's body checked for persistent-state writes (SaveChanges/repository Add-Update) or event publishes by resolved invocation. Deterministic, type-level, exhaustive over the detected handlers.
Coverage: Population: CQRS handlers identified by IQueryHandler/ICommandHandler/IRequestHandler interface + *Query/Get*/Find*/*Command NAME convention; query purity then checked exhaustively within that set — a query handler using neither convention is invisible, and mutation is a resolved persistence/publish CALL, not full dataflow.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue in this repository's Dart: methods whose whole body still throws UnimplementedError or a "not implemented" error, and placeholder text (lorem ipsum, changeme/replace_me…) left in strings of non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's Dart: methods that only throw UnimplementedError or a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — CONTRIBUTING.md:64
CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — CONTRIBUTING.md:64
docs/README.md names `src/assets/`, but no file or folder `src/assets` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/README.md:36
docs/src/content/docs/index.md links to `/flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png`, but `flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/src/content/docs/index.md:37
docs/src/content/docs/packages.md links to `../components/table`, but `docs/src/content/components/table` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/src/content/docs/packages.md:26
docs/src/content/docs/packages.md links to `../components/avatar`, but `docs/src/content/components/avatar` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong. — docs/src/content/docs/packages.md:34
What to do
Reconcile the README with reality: CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant` exists; CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant` exists; docs/README.md names `src/assets/`, but no file or folder `src/assets` exists; docs/src/content/docs/index.md links to `/flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png`, but `flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png` does not exist; docs/src/content/docs/packages.md links to `../components/table`, but `docs/src/content/components/table` does not exist.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
259/334 types (78%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API.
What to do
Keep implementation types off the public surface (Dart: a `_` name, or keep it under `lib/src/` unexported) so internals can change without breaking consumers.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
No logging call was found in the 178 Dart, JavaScript/TypeScript production file(s) this check read across 4 module(s). Each was searched for its ecosystem's logging libraries (JavaScript/TypeScript: pino, winston, bunyan, log4js, loglevel, consola, the NestJS Logger; Dart: package:logging, package:logger, dart:developer's log()) and for a call on a receiver named `log`/`logger` (or ending in `Logger`/`_logger`) with a level verb. It cannot see logging through a repo-local wrapper named otherwise, or in source it did not read — this is 'no logging found by this walk', not a verdict that nothing here logs. If it is right, production issues will be hard to diagnose.
What to do
Adopt `package:logging` (or `package:logger`) and log at meaningful points in the apps and servers you run.
Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (the opentelemetry package) and a health-check endpoint (a /health route on your shelf router) for operability.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 22454 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
What to do
Add a SAST step to CI running what this repository's stack ships: the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` — so a security regression fails the build instead of landing.
Dependabot is configured but does not watch `npm` — add that `package-ecosystem` entry to REDACTED so those dependencies get the same automatic update and advisory pressure as the ones it already covers.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Make sure a person approves each release. The release job names an environment, but its approval rules live in the code host's settings, where Watchdog can't see them. Check that a reviewer must approve each release, or publish releases as drafts first, so a bad build can be stopped before anyone downloads it.
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
Other · Security — Read from this repository's Dart source: cryptographic hygiene (weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source) and outbound TLS certificate validation — facts about code that hold whether or not it serves anything itself. The TLS protocol version is not read: `dart:io` leaves the protocol floor to the platform's TLS library and has no switch that admits an obsolete version. This repository commits the configuration that serves its own HTTP surface, so that configuration was read in full for the security response headers it sets. This repository serves no HTTP of its own — no server framework among its pubspec dependencies, no `HttpServer` bound and no shelf, dart_frog or serverpod import in its production source or `bin/`. Its Flutter web build (`playground/web/index.html`) compiles to static files that run in the browser and are served by whatever hosts them: static files cannot enforce HTTPS, send HSTS or any other response header, set an HttpOnly cookie or validate a request, so those controls are the host's, not this code's. Where this repository commits the host's configuration (an nginx, Caddy or Apache config, a serving Dockerfile, `_headers`, `vercel.json`, `netlify.toml`, `firebase.json`, `staticwebapp.config.json`) it is read for the security response headers it sets, and the shipped page is read for third-party scripts loaded without Subresource Integrity.
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because `firebase.json` configures this repository's static hosting, including its response headers, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (−2.0 on this card.) — playground/firebase.json:1
What to do
Set security response headers on the surface this repository serves: an `add_header` directive per header in the nginx/Caddy/Apache config, a `_headers` / `vercel.json` / `netlify.toml` entry for a static host, or `helmet()` in the HTTP server. `Content-Security-Policy` is the one that pays for itself first — it is what contains an injected script once one reaches the page — followed by `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` and a frame policy (`X-Frame-Options: DENY`, or CSP `frame-ancestors`). Where the app is served from a build container, the header configuration belongs in the image beside the built assets, so it ships with them rather than depending on where it lands.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document3.5 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`deepCopy` is public and takes `Map<dynamic, dynamic> ? map` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 171 (`deepCopy`) with a piece of `map` — and nowhere in `deepCopy` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. `jsonDecode` sets no nesting limit: 2 MB of brackets parse to a million levels, while a walk like this one throws `StackOverflowError` from about 20,000 levels — 40,000 bytes (Dart 3.13 VM; on the web the limit is the browser's stack). That is an `Error`, not an `Exception`: an `on Exception catch` around the call does not stop it, so the request, the frame or the isolate fails with it. Thread a depth argument through `deepCopy` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack. — lib/src/utils/extensions/map.dart:171
What to do
Each finding names the externally-callable member that accepts the document and the self-call that descends, and states that no depth parameter or counter exists anywhere in the walk. Confirm from the two, then thread a depth argument through the walk and reject documents past a fixed maximum, or rewrite it with an explicit stack.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`ShadInputState` carries a disposal duty — a `State`, so the framework calls its `dispose()` when it leaves the tree — and it creates `_focusNode` itself (line 685, `FocusNode`), which makes that instance its own. Nothing in the class releases it — no `_focusNode.dispose()`, no tear-off of it, on any path — nothing elsewhere in the library releases it through another instance, and it is never handed on as a value (passed positionally, returned, stored, collected), so no other owner can be ending it. Passing it as a named argument does not: a widget or animation never disposes a controller it was given. On what was read, `FocusNode` outlives the object that made it — its listeners, and through them this object and everything it references, stay reachable, and a ticker, timer or subscription keeps calling into a disposed object. Release it where the duty is discharged: `_focusNode.dispose();` in `dispose()` before `super.dispose()`. — lib/src/components/input.dart:685
What to do
Each finding names the value and the span that decides who owns it — the `new` that created it, or the constructor parameter that handed it over. Confirm ownership from that span, then make the disposal match it: release what this type created, leave what it was injected with to whoever created THAT, and drop a finalizer whose type holds nothing unmanaged to release.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `NullPointerException` (Java, Kotlin, Scala), `ArgumentError.notNull` (Dart) or `ArgumentNullException` (F#'s `nullArg`) tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `for … in` loop leaves the `List`, `Map` or `Set` it is walking alone — Dart's collection iterators check that the collection has not changed since the loop began, so a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is walking (or the map whose `keys`, `values` or `entries` it walks) makes the next step throw `ConcurrentModificationError` and the remaining elements are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether Dart's sound null safety is on and is not undermined by null assertions — a package whose `environment: sdk:` lower bound is 2.12 or above is null safe, so `String` cannot hold null and `String?` must be checked before use, and each postfix `!` is a run-time `Null check operator used on a null value` the author has told the analyzer cannot happen.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Reference — by lens
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 13 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 1 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 58 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC2 Forms & labels — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC3 Page structure — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC5 ARIA correctness — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AC7 A11y enforcement — Frontend below the scale floor (17 DOM element(s) < 25) — too little surface to assess accessibility.
AX1 Captive dependencies — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX2 Stateful singletons — Not applicable: Dart isolates share no mutable memory, so no two requests write one object at the same instant. TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — no exported interface declares behaviour
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — the dev server did not expose a crawlable HTTP endpoint in time — no runtime evidence This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Drift table, an Isar, ObjectBox, Floor or Hive entity, or a Serverpod table model — and no database or data-store client (sqflite, Drift, Isar, Hive, Realm, Firestore, Supabase, postgres, …) in the source either, so this repository keeps no data at rest for these controls to protect.
C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — this repository stands up no server another machine can reach (no HttpServer or shelf server bound beyond loopback, no dart_frog route, no Serverpod endpoint, no Conduit, Alfred or Angel application) and keeps no data in a hosted backend. Access control is therefore N/A here — a Flutter app or pub package is authorized by the server it calls, not by itself; hiding a screen authorizes nothing. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Drift table, an ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, an Isar @collection, a Hive @HiveType or a Serverpod table model — and no database or data-store client (sqflite, Firestore, Supabase, postgres, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no sensitive data whose changes an audit trail would record. If it does (through a hosted backend configured outside this repository, for instance), the trail belongs to wherever that data is stored.
C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Drift table, an ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, an Isar @collection, a Hive @HiveType or a Serverpod table model — and no database or data-store client (sqflite, Firestore, Supabase, postgres, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data whose lifetime a retention limit would bound.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in a persisted data model — no PII-named field (email, firstName, dateOfBirth, phoneNumber, …) or stored credential on a Drift table, an ObjectBox/Floor @Entity, an Isar @collection, a Hive @HiveType or a Serverpod table model — and no database or data-store client (sqflite, Firestore, Supabase, postgres, …) imported either, so this repository keeps no personal data for a data subject to erase, export or consent over.
D10 Test Quality — ~8579 lines of test source are present (.dart) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no .dart test runner
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ projects each declaring an entity of their own. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.dart), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
D9 Test Distribution — Test source is present (.dart) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so its unit/integration/BDD/E2E split couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED2 Event/command shape — not scored — deciding whether a command has more than one competing handler requires resolving the call graph, which this analysis does not build from source alone for this language. Reported as guidance rather than measured
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the Dart, JavaScript/TypeScript source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `flutter test --coverage` (or `dart test --coverage=coverage` then `dart run coverage:format_coverage --lcov`)) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for classes extending benchmark_harness's `BenchmarkBase`, `AsyncBenchmarkBase` or `PerfBenchmarkBase` (directly or through a base of your own), `benchmark(…)` calls under the pub `benchmark` package, Flutter's `benchmarkWidgets`, `watchPerformance` or `traceAction` in a test importing flutter_test, integration_test or flutter_driver, or benchmark_harness, benchmark or web_benchmarks in a pubspec.yaml, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: allocation awareness is rated where code engineers for it — at least 400 production lines that ship benchmarks or already use allocation-aware idioms (8 or more). This repository's Dart code has 46,969 production line(s), 3 such use(s) and no benchmarks, so there is no allocation work to rate. The card is reward-only: its absence costs nothing.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X2 Cancellation propagation — no C# was loaded; this repository's Dart was read, and no request in it can be cancelled by a caller (Dio, or package:http's Abortable requests) — package:http's get and post, HttpClient and Firebase or gRPC stubs offer their callers no token to take
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — This check asks whether log calls keep a message's values apart from its text, which needs a logger that can carry them as fields. This repository's Dart was read, and it logs through none: package:logging, package:logger, talker and dart:developer take one finished message and no template arguments or fields (as log4net does in C#), so an interpolated message there loses nothing the API could have kept. Sentry's structured logs (`Sentry.logger`) would be judged.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: input.dart ↔ input.dart lib/src/components/input.dart:1— `lib/src/components/input.dart` (context components) and `lib/src/theme/components/input.dart` (context theme) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 82% of the time (9 of the 11 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `a1d05898` feat: top, bottom and onLineCountChange to shadinput (#523); `fde2f772` fix: input alignment (#429); `0252d9d6` feat: adds cursor customization through theme. (#417) — run `git show` on any of them.
MethodTooLong: _ShadCalendarState.build lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1138— MethodTooLong — build runs 586 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 486 over it, 5.86× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadDatePickerState.build lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:994— MethodTooLong — build runs 338 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 238 over it, 3.38× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadSelectState.build lib/src/components/select.dart:919— MethodTooLong — build runs 270 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 170 over it, 2.70× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadSliderState.build lib/src/components/slider.dart:394— MethodTooLong — build runs 262 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 162 over it, 2.62× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadInputState.build lib/src/components/input.dart:1009— MethodTooLong — build runs 248 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 148 over it, 2.48× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDialog.build lib/src/components/dialog.dart:560— MethodTooLong — build runs 223 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 123 over it, 2.23× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadGestureDetectorState.build lib/src/utils/gesture_detector.dart:316— MethodTooLong — build runs 220 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 120 over it, 2.20× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadSheetState.build lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1159— MethodTooLong — build runs 202 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 102 over it, 2.02× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadTimePickerState.build lib/src/components/time_picker.dart:747— MethodTooLong — build runs 190 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 90 over it, 1.90× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadResizablePanelGroupState.build lib/src/components/resizable.dart:635— MethodTooLong — build runs 179 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 79 over it, 1.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadSonnerState.build lib/src/components/sonner.dart:314— MethodTooLong — build runs 173 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 73 over it, 1.73× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadTabState.build lib/src/components/tabs.dart:778— MethodTooLong — build runs 165 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 65 over it, 1.65× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadTextTheme.apply lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:426— MethodTooLong — apply runs 158 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 58 over it, 1.58× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadButtonState.build lib/src/components/button.dart:956— MethodTooLong — build runs 157 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 57 over it, 1.57× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadThemeData.ShadThemeData lib/src/theme/data.dart:52— MethodTooLong — ShadThemeData runs 156 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 56 over it, 1.56× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDateRangePickerFormField.ShadDateRangePickerFormField lib/src/components/form/fields/date_range_picker.dart:18— MethodTooLong — ShadDateRangePickerFormField runs 150 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 50 over it, 1.50× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDatePickerFormField.ShadDatePickerFormField lib/src/components/form/fields/date_picker.dart:17— MethodTooLong — ShadDatePickerFormField runs 148 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 48 over it, 1.48× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadTextareaState.build lib/src/components/textarea.dart:535— MethodTooLong — build runs 143 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 43 over it, 1.43× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDatePicker.raw lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:321— MethodTooLong — raw runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadToastState.build lib/src/components/toast.dart:568— MethodTooLong — build runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDatePicker.ShadDatePicker lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:32— MethodTooLong — ShadDatePicker runs 140 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 40 over it, 1.40× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShadDatePicker.range lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:176— MethodTooLong — range runs 140 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 40 over it, 1.40× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadSheetState.buildExpandable lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1447— MethodTooLong — buildExpandable runs 136 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.36× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadMenubarItemState.build lib/src/components/menubar.dart:458— MethodTooLong — build runs 133 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 33 over it, 1.33× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: _ShadAccordionItemState.build lib/src/components/accordion.dart:367— MethodTooLong — build runs 125 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.25× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FileTooLong: components/calendar.dart lib/src/components/calendar.dart— FileTooLong — 1195 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 64% of them inside a single declaration: _ShadCalendarState (871-1952). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 695 over it, 2.39× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: components/sheet.dart lib/src/components/sheet.dart— FileTooLong — 1170 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 670 over it, 2.34× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/date_picker.dart lib/src/components/date_picker.dart— FileTooLong — 973 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 473 over it, 1.95× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/select.dart lib/src/components/select.dart— FileTooLong — 904 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 404 over it, 1.81× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart— FileTooLong — 885 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: ShadDefaultThemeNoSecondaryBorderVariant (51-1137). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 385 over it, 1.77× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: themes/default_theme_variant.dart lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart— FileTooLong — 865 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: ShadDefaultThemeVariant (51-1113). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 365 over it, 1.73× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: components/input.dart lib/src/components/input.dart— FileTooLong — 810 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 310 over it, 1.62× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/time_picker.dart lib/src/components/time_picker.dart— FileTooLong — 750 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 250 over it, 1.50× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/button.dart lib/src/components/button.dart— FileTooLong — 737 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 237 over it, 1.47× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: fields/select.dart lib/src/components/form/fields/select.dart— FileTooLong — 653 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 153 over it, 1.31× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: text_theme/theme.dart lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart— FileTooLong — 590 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 72% of them inside a single declaration: ShadTextTheme (182-683). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 90 over it, 1.18× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: components/resizable.dart lib/src/components/resizable.dart— FileTooLong — 550 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 50 over it, 1.10× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/context_menu.dart lib/src/components/context_menu.dart— FileTooLong — 529 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 29 over it, 1.06× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/tabs.dart lib/src/components/tabs.dart— FileTooLong — 517 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.03× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
Low cohesion: ShadInputState (LCOM4 8) lib/src/components/input.dart:678— ShadInputState's methods fall into 8 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 8 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: _ShadCalendarState (LCOM4 6) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:871— _ShadCalendarState's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadDefaultThemeNoSecondaryBorderVariant (LCOM4 6) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:51— ShadDefaultThemeNoSecondaryBorderVariant's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadDefaultThemeVariant (LCOM4 6) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:51— ShadDefaultThemeVariant's methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: _ShadAppState (LCOM4 5) lib/src/app.dart:429— _ShadAppState's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadSonnerState (LCOM4 5) lib/src/components/sonner.dart:165— ShadSonnerState's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadMouseAreaRenderBox (LCOM4 5) lib/src/utils/mouse_area.dart:327— ShadMouseAreaRenderBox's methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadContextMenuState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/context_menu.dart:389— ShadContextMenuState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadFormBuilderFieldState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/form/field.dart:166— ShadFormBuilderFieldState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadFormBuilderSelectState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/form/fields/select.dart:432— ShadFormBuilderSelectState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadFormBuilderSelectMultipleState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/form/fields/select.dart:831— ShadFormBuilderSelectMultipleState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadRadioGroupState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/radio.dart:116— ShadRadioGroupState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: ShadSelectState (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/select.dart:702— ShadSelectState's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
Low cohesion: RenderSheetLayoutWithSizeListener (LCOM4 4) lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1903— RenderSheetLayoutWithSizeListener's methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
ClassTooLong: ShadDefaultThemeNoSecondaryBorderVariant lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:51— ClassTooLong — 836 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 50 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 436 over it, 2.09× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadDefaultThemeVariant lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:51— ClassTooLong — 816 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 50 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 416 over it, 2.04× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _ShadCalendarState lib/src/components/calendar.dart:871— ClassTooLong — 762 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 362 over it, 1.91× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: _ShadSheetState lib/src/components/sheet.dart:795— ClassTooLong — 627 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 26 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 227 over it, 1.57× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadDatePicker lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:23— ClassTooLong — 570 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 4 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 170 over it, 1.43× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadInputState lib/src/components/input.dart:678— ClassTooLong — 462 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 23 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.16× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadTextTheme lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:181— ClassTooLong — 426 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 9 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 26 over it, 1.07× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadButton lib/src/components/button.dart:32— ClassTooLong — 425 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 8 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 25 over it, 1.06× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ShadSelectState lib/src/components/select.dart:702— ClassTooLong — 411 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 15 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 11 over it, 1.03× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:190— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:190-199 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:173-182 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:201— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:201-210 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:184-193 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:212— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:212-221 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:195-204 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:780— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:780-789 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:766-775 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:879— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:879-888 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:864-873 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1047— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1047-1056 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1025-1034 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:156— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:156-165 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:139-148 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1127— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1127-1136 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1103-1112 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/tabs.dart:24— example/lib/pages/tabs.dart:24-48 | playground/lib/pages/tabs.dart:21-45 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1581— lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1581-1605 | lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1607-1631 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:217— lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:217-241 | lib/src/components/switch.dart:269-293 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/components/checkbox.dart` and `lib/src/components/switch.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 78 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:293— lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:293-317 | lib/src/components/switch.dart:352-376 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/components/checkbox.dart` and `lib/src/components/switch.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 78 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:305— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:305-329 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:289-313 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 2) lib/src/utils/mouse_area.dart:97— lib/src/utils/mouse_area.dart:97-121 | lib/src/utils/mouse_area.dart:125-149 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:286— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:286-304 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:269-287 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:378— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:378-396 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:367-385 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:717— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:717-735 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:703-721 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:823— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:823-841 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:807-825 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1027— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1027-1045 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1006-1024 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:23— example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:23-41 | example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart:26-44 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 71 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/src/components/progress.dart:270— lib/src/components/progress.dart:270-287 | lib/src/components/progress.dart:300-317 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:398— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:398-415 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:387-404 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:428— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:428-445 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:416-433 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:566— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:566-583 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:551-568 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:590— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:590-607 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:575-592 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) playground/lib/pages/form.dart:199— playground/lib/pages/form.dart:199-216 | playground/lib/pages/input_otp.dart:23-40 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:116— example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:116-126 | playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart:108-115 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/menubar.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 106 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:88— example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:88-95 | playground/lib/pages/form.dart:110-119 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:368— lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:368-375 | lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart:319-326 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:223— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:223-230 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:206-213 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:232— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:232-239 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:215-222 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:614— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:614-636 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:599-621 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:638— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:638-660 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:623-645 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:799— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:799-821 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:783-805 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:102— playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:102-124 | playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:144-166 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/input.dart:42— example/lib/pages/input.dart:42-58 | playground/lib/pages/input.dart:53-69 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) lib/src/app.dart:602— lib/src/app.dart:602-618 | lib/src/app.dart:635-651 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1063— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1063-1079 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1040-1056 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/select.dart:154— example/lib/pages/select.dart:154-170 | example/lib/pages/select.dart:258-274 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:77— example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:77-92 | playground/lib/pages/form.dart:191-206 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:184— lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:184-199 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:352-367 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:455— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:455-470 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:443-458 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) playground/lib/pages/toast.dart:18— playground/lib/pages/toast.dart:18-33 | playground/lib/pages/toast.dart:79-94 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:46— example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:46-56 | playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart:22-31 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/dialog.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) lib/src/components/input.dart:1043— lib/src/components/input.dart:1043-1053 | lib/src/components/textarea.dart:553-562 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/data.dart:209— lib/src/theme/data.dart:209-219 | lib/src/theme/data.dart:229-238 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10–11 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:477— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:477-487 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:465-474 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:377— lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:377-383 | lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart:346-352 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:447— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:447-453 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:435-441 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/components/button.dart:122— lib/src/theme/components/button.dart:122-128 | lib/src/theme/components/button_sizes.dart:27-33 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) playground/lib/pages/date_picker.dart:46— playground/lib/pages/date_picker.dart:46-52 | playground/lib/pages/time_picker.dart:46-52 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
TooManyMethods: ShadDefaultThemeNoSecondaryBorderVariant lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:51— TooManyMethods — 50 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 20 over it, 1.67× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ShadDefaultThemeVariant lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:51— TooManyMethods — 50 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 20 over it, 1.67× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ShadThemeVariant lib/src/theme/themes/base.dart:157— TooManyMethods — 48 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 18 over it, 1.60× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Change coupling: default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart ↔ default_theme_variant.dart lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1— `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` change together 100% of the time (26 of the 26 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 26 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `2dabee49` fix: Make unchecked checkbox color changable (#634); `1f39f884` Feat: fallback for ShadAnchorAuto (#619); `fa2115a3` fix: ShadBreadcrumbLink layout with ShadButtons (#531) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: input.dart ↔ textarea.dart lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:1— `lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart` and `lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart` change together 70% of the time (7 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `a1d05898` feat: top, bottom and onLineCountChange to shadinput (#523); `a69e4092` fix: 435 input and textarea on changed fired twice (#437); `d7b98c33` feat: keyboard toolbar (#423) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: textarea.dart ↔ input.dart lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart:1— `lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart` and `lib/src/components/input.dart` change together 50% of the time (5 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 5 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `a1d05898` feat: top, bottom and onLineCountChange to shadinput (#523); `d7b98c33` feat: keyboard toolbar (#423); `fde2f772` fix: input alignment (#429) — run `git show` on any of them.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/card.dart:104— example/lib/pages/card.dart:104-127 | playground/lib/pages/card.dart:111-134 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/card.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/card.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 82 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:755— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:755-778 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:741-764 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:41— example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:41-64 | example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:81-104 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 3) lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:225— lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:225-238 | lib/src/components/radio.dart:375-388 | lib/src/components/switch.dart:277-290 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/components/checkbox.dart` and `lib/src/components/switch.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 78 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 3) lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:289— lib/src/components/checkbox.dart:289-302 | lib/src/components/radio.dart:435-448 | lib/src/components/switch.dart:348-361 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/components/checkbox.dart` and `lib/src/components/switch.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 78 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 3) lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:40— lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:40-53 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:56-69 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:72-85 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:8— lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:8-21 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:24-37 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:539— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:539-552 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:521-534 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:859— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:859-872 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:844-857 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:128— example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:128-137 | playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart:117-125 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/menubar.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 106 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:745— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:745-753 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:731-739 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1081— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1081-1089 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1058-1066 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×2
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:23— example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:23-126 | example/lib/pages/sheet.dart:28-139 | playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart:15-95 | playground/lib/pages/sheet.dart:121-159 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:87— lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:87-101 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:135-149 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:151-165 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:199-213 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:979— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:979-1005 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:971-997 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/checkbox.dart:19— example/lib/pages/checkbox.dart:19-45 | example/lib/pages/switch.dart:19-45 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) lib/src/components/sonner.dart:448— lib/src/components/sonner.dart:448-469 | lib/src/components/toast.dart:151-172 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:167— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:167-188 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:150-171 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:17— example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:17-37 | playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart:22-42 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/menubar.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 106 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:45— example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:45-65 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:46-66 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 74 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 4) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:668— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:668-686 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:695-713 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:653-671 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:681-699 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 4) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:25— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:25-43 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:40-58 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:31-49 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:25-43 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 94 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1091— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:1091-1102 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1068-1079 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:506— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:506-517 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:1084-1095 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) lib/src/components/slider.dart:525— lib/src/components/slider.dart:525-535 | lib/src/components/slider.dart:659-670 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:967— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:967-977 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:959-969 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
_ShadCalendarState.build (cyclomatic 87) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1138— _ShadCalendarState.build has cyclomatic complexity 87 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass's cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/src/components/calendar.dart holds 3 of the 23 methods over the threshold — including the worst — and 80 of the 245 points over it (33%), 2.8× the next-largest file (lib/src/components/resizable.dart at 29). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository.
ShadDialog.build (cyclomatic 37) lib/src/components/dialog.dart:560— ShadDialog.build has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadSliderState.build (cyclomatic 37) lib/src/components/slider.dart:394— _ShadSliderState.build has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadResizableController.resize (cyclomatic 30) lib/src/components/resizable.dart:128— ShadResizableController.resize has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ShadResizablePanelGroupState.build (cyclomatic 29) lib/src/components/resizable.dart:635— ShadResizablePanelGroupState.build has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_FormPageState.build (cyclomatic 27) playground/lib/pages/form.dart:48— _FormPageState.build has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ShadColorScheme.fromName (cyclomatic 26) lib/src/theme/color_scheme/base.dart:43— ShadColorScheme.fromName has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ShadGestureDetectorState.build (cyclomatic 26) lib/src/utils/gesture_detector.dart:316— _ShadGestureDetectorState.build has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadSheetState.buildExpandable (cyclomatic 23) lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1447— _ShadSheetState.buildExpandable has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadColorScheme.== (cyclomatic 23) lib/src/theme/color_scheme/base.dart:263— ShadColorScheme.== has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadPortalState._calculatePosition (cyclomatic 22) lib/src/raw_components/portal.dart:315— _ShadPortalState._calculatePosition has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ShadCalendarState.didUpdateWidget (cyclomatic 21) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:969— _ShadCalendarState.didUpdateWidget has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass's cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/src/components/calendar.dart holds 3 of the 23 methods over the threshold — including the worst — and 80 of the 245 points over it (33%), 2.8× the next-largest file (lib/src/components/resizable.dart at 29). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository.
_ShadButtonState.build (cyclomatic 20) lib/src/components/button.dart:956— _ShadButtonState.build has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadDatePickerState.build (cyclomatic 20) lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:994— _ShadDatePickerState.build has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
_ShadSheetState.build (cyclomatic 20) lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1159— _ShadSheetState.build has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadSelectState.build (cyclomatic 19) lib/src/components/select.dart:919— ShadSelectState.build has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadDecorator.build (cyclomatic 19) lib/src/theme/components/decorator.dart:115— ShadDecorator.build has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
ShadTextTheme.== (cyclomatic 19) lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:634— ShadTextTheme.== has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadTableState._buildRowSpan (cyclomatic 18) lib/src/components/table.dart:583— _ShadTableState._buildRowSpan has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadCalendarState.enabled (cyclomatic 17) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:918— _ShadCalendarState.enabled has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators. This file is where this pass's cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: lib/src/components/calendar.dart holds 3 of the 23 methods over the threshold — including the worst — and 80 of the 245 points over it (33%), 2.8× the next-largest file (lib/src/components/resizable.dart at 29). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository.
ShadInputState.didUpdateWidget (cyclomatic 17) lib/src/components/input.dart:723— ShadInputState.didUpdateWidget has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ShadTimePickerState.build (cyclomatic 17) lib/src/components/time_picker.dart:747— _ShadTimePickerState.build has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
_ShadTabState.build (cyclomatic 16) lib/src/components/tabs.dart:778— _ShadTabState.build has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadCalendarState.build (cognitive 115) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1138— _ShadCalendarState.build has cognitive complexity 115 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 35 (59 pts), ternaries 17 (25 pts), boolean chains 23, match/switch 7 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 33). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShadResizableController.resize (cognitive 66) lib/src/components/resizable.dart:128— ShadResizableController.resize has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (34 pts), loops 10 (22 pts), ternaries 5 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 35). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShadResizablePanelGroupState.build (cognitive 44) lib/src/components/resizable.dart:635— ShadResizablePanelGroupState.build has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 19 (34 pts), if/else 2 (4 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShadDialog.build (cognitive 38) lib/src/components/dialog.dart:560— ShadDialog.build has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (14 pts), boolean chains 13, ternaries 10, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
_ShadSliderState.build (cognitive 37) lib/src/components/slider.dart:394— _ShadSliderState.build has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 27 (28 pts), boolean chains 8, if/else 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_FormPageState.build (cognitive 31) playground/lib/pages/form.dart:48— _FormPageState.build has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (24 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ShadPortalState._calculatePosition (cognitive 27) lib/src/raw_components/portal.dart:315— _ShadPortalState._calculatePosition has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), boolean chains 11, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ShadTimePickerState.build (cognitive 25) lib/src/components/time_picker.dart:747— _ShadTimePickerState.build has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (21 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShadColorScheme.fromName (cognitive 25) lib/src/theme/color_scheme/base.dart:43— ShadColorScheme.fromName has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12 (24 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 12). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction — a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full — so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident.
_ShadGestureDetectorState.build (cognitive 25) lib/src/utils/gesture_detector.dart:316— _ShadGestureDetectorState.build has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 16, if/else 9. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ShadColorScheme.== (cognitive 22) lib/src/theme/color_scheme/base.dart:263— ShadColorScheme.== has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 21, if/else 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadCalendarState.didUpdateWidget (cognitive 21) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:969— _ShadCalendarState.didUpdateWidget has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 14, if/else 7. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ShadInputState.didUpdateWidget (cognitive 21) lib/src/components/input.dart:723— ShadInputState.didUpdateWidget has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ShadButtonState.build (cognitive 20) lib/src/components/button.dart:956— _ShadButtonState.build has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8, if/else 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadSelectState.build (cognitive 20) lib/src/components/select.dart:919— ShadSelectState.build has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12, ternaries 5, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadSheetState.buildExpandable (cognitive 19) lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1447— _ShadSheetState.buildExpandable has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 17, if/else 1, match/switch 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadCalendarState.enabled (cognitive 18) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:918— _ShadCalendarState.enabled has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, if/else 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadInputOTPSlotState.build (cognitive 18) lib/src/components/input_otp.dart:418— _ShadInputOTPSlotState.build has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ShadTabState.build (cognitive 18) lib/src/components/tabs.dart:778— _ShadTabState.build has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 10 (14 pts), if/else 3, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
ShadTextTheme.== (cognitive 18) lib/src/theme/text_theme/theme.dart:634— ShadTextTheme.== has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 16, if/else 2. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
_ShadSheetState.build (cognitive 17) lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1159— _ShadSheetState.build has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8, if/else 5, match/switch 3, boolean chains 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadTableState._buildRowSpan (cognitive 17) lib/src/components/table.dart:583— _ShadTableState._buildRowSpan has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10, ternaries 5, boolean chains 2. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadCalendarState.generateDatesForMonth (cognitive 16) lib/src/components/calendar.dart:1045— _ShadCalendarState.generateDatesForMonth has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 6, if/else 4 (6 pts), loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_ShadContextMenuRegionState.build (cognitive 16) lib/src/components/context_menu.dart:172— _ShadContextMenuRegionState.build has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (9 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 3 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
_ShadDatePickerState.build (cognitive 16) lib/src/components/date_picker.dart:994— _ShadDatePickerState.build has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 5, boolean chains 4, if/else 4, match/switch 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ShadSelectState.initState (cognitive 16) lib/src/components/select.dart:740— ShadSelectState.initState has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
D4 · Code Duplication· Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 19 shared lines) · ×1
Near-duplicate member family (4 members, 19 shared lines) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:662— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:662-688 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:690-715 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:647-674 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:676-701 — These 4 members are variants of one another: a block of 19 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Near-duplicate member pair (101 shared lines) example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:17— example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:17-141 | playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart:22-127 — These two members are variants of one another: 101 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (63–64 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:51— example/lib/pages/menubar.dart:51-114 | playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart:44-106 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/menubar.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/menubar.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 106 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (64 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:902— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:902-965 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:894-957 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (45 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/card.dart:129— example/lib/pages/card.dart:129-173 | playground/lib/pages/card.dart:136-180 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/card.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/card.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 82 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (44–45 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/context_menu.dart:45— example/lib/pages/context_menu.dart:45-89 | playground/lib/pages/context_menu.dart:33-76 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (44 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:241— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:241-284 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:224-267 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (36 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/table.dart:63— example/lib/pages/table.dart:63-98 | playground/lib/pages/table.dart:61-96 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (33–34 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:336— lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart:336-368 | lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart:321-354 — before extracting anything, compare `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant.dart` and `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 40 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 711 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (33 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:61— example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:61-93 | playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart:32-64 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/dialog.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (32 lines × 2) lib/src/components/sonner.dart:475— lib/src/components/sonner.dart:475-506 | lib/src/components/toast.dart:174-205 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (25–26 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/date_picker.dart:65— example/lib/pages/date_picker.dart:65-90 | playground/lib/pages/date_picker.dart:73-97 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (26 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/tabs.dart:51— example/lib/pages/tabs.dart:51-76 | playground/lib/pages/tabs.dart:48-73 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (19–21 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/select.dart:181— example/lib/pages/select.dart:181-201 | playground/lib/pages/select.dart:100-118 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/select.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/select.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:104— example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:104-123 | playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart:72-91 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/dialog.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18–19 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/sonner.dart:22— example/lib/pages/sonner.dart:22-40 | playground/lib/pages/sonner.dart:17-34 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 3) example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:104— example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:104-120 | playground/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:38-54 | playground/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:96-112 — there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) — more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart.
Duplicated block (16–17 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/select.dart:226— example/lib/pages/select.dart:226-242 | playground/lib/pages/select.dart:173-188 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/select.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/select.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (13–15 lines × 4) example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:67— example/lib/pages/dialog.dart:67-81 | example/lib/pages/sheet.dart:109-123 | playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart:38-52 | playground/lib/pages/sheet.dart:138-150 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/dialog.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/dialog.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 79 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (13–15 lines × 2) lib/src/components/input.dart:1068— lib/src/components/input.dart:1068-1082 | lib/src/components/textarea.dart:575-587 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (12–15 lines × 2) lib/src/theme/data.dart:147— lib/src/theme/data.dart:147-161 | lib/src/theme/data.dart:204-215 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 4) lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:88— lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:88-101 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:136-149 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:152-165 | lib/src/theme/text_theme/text_styles_default.dart:200-213 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:33— playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:33-45 | playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:88-100 | playground/lib/pages/resizable.dart:130-142 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (12–13 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/card.dart:70— example/lib/pages/card.dart:70-82 | playground/lib/pages/card.dart:52-63 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/card.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/card.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 82 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/select.dart:80— example/lib/pages/select.dart:80-84 | playground/lib/pages/select.dart:160-164 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/select.dart` and `playground/lib/pages/select.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:396— lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:396-401 | lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart:354-359 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
D4 · Code Duplication· Near-duplicate member family (9 members, 29 shared lines) · ×1
Near-duplicate member family (9 members, 29 shared lines) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:25— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:25-120 | example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:23-122 | example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:23-129 | example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:26-140 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:40-137 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:31-141 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:25-120 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:26-125 | example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart:26-123 — These 9 members are variants of one another: a block of 29 lines reported below appears in every one of them, and the pairwise near-duplicate rows they would otherwise produce are collapsed into this row. Read them as one construct written 9 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 9 times.
Duplicated block (28 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:40— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:40-67 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:40-67 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 6 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 122 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 7) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:98— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:98-120 | example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:107-129 | example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:118-140 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:115-137 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:119-141 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:98-120 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:103-125 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 75 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (20–22 lines × 8) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:84— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:84-103 | example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:88-107 | example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:91-112 | example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:104-123 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:101-120 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:105-124 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:84-103 | example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart:89-108 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (20–21 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:30— example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:30-49 | example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:122-142 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (19–20 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:26— example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:26-44 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:26-45 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 9) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:33— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:33-50 | example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:30-47 | example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:34-51 | example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:34-51 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:48-65 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:39-56 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:33-50 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:35-52 | example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart:33-50 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (15–16 lines × 4) example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:30— example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:30-45 | example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:51-65 | example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:91-105 | example/lib/pages/breadcrumb.dart:123-138 — all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) example/lib/pages/button.dart:95— example/lib/pages/button.dart:95-109 | example/lib/pages/icon_button.dart:57-71 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (11–12 lines × 9) example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:95— example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart:95-105 | example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart:99-109 | example/lib/pages/input_form_field.dart:103-114 | example/lib/pages/input_otp_form_field.dart:115-125 | example/lib/pages/radio_group_form_field.dart:112-122 | example/lib/pages/select_form_field.dart:116-126 | example/lib/pages/switch_form_field.dart:95-105 | example/lib/pages/textarea_form_field.dart:100-110 | example/lib/pages/time_picker_form_field.dart:100-110 — before extracting anything, compare `example/lib/pages/checkbox_form_field.dart` and `example/lib/pages/date_picker_form_field.dart` as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Off the main sequence: shadcn_ui — shadcn_ui: abstractness 0.03, instability 0.00, distance 0.97 — zone of pain — concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it's rigid to change.
No structured logging — No logging call was found in the 178 Dart, JavaScript/TypeScript production file(s) this check read across 4 module(s). Each was searched for its ecosystem's logging libraries (JavaScript/TypeScript: pino, winston, bunyan, log4js, loglevel, consola, the NestJS Logger; Dart: package:logging, package:logger, dart:developer's log()) and for a call on a receiver named `log`/`logger` (or ending in `Logger`/`_logger`) with a level verb. It cannot see logging through a repo-local wrapper named otherwise, or in source it did not read — this is 'no logging found by this walk', not a verdict that nothing here logs. If it is right, production issues will be hard to diagnose.
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document· Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap · ×1
Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap lib/src/utils/extensions/map.dart:171— `deepCopy` is public and takes `Map<dynamic, dynamic> ? map` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 171 (`deepCopy`) with a piece of `map` — and nowhere in `deepCopy` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. `jsonDecode` sets no nesting limit: 2 MB of brackets parse to a million levels, while a walk like this one throws `StackOverflowError` from about 20,000 levels — 40,000 bytes (Dart 3.13 VM; on the web the limit is the browser's stack). That is an `Error`, not an `Exception`: an `on Exception catch` around the call does not stop it, so the request, the frame or the isolate fails with it. Thread a depth argument through `deepCopy` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack.
X18 · Disposal-pattern correctness· Owned disposable field is never released · ×1
Owned disposable field is never released lib/src/components/input.dart:685— `ShadInputState` carries a disposal duty — a `State`, so the framework calls its `dispose()` when it leaves the tree — and it creates `_focusNode` itself (line 685, `FocusNode`), which makes that instance its own. Nothing in the class releases it — no `_focusNode.dispose()`, no tear-off of it, on any path — nothing elsewhere in the library releases it through another instance, and it is never handed on as a value (passed positionally, returned, stored, collected), so no other owner can be ending it. Passing it as a named argument does not: a widget or animation never disposes a controller it was given. On what was read, `FocusNode` outlives the object that made it — its listeners, and through them this object and everything it references, stay reachable, and a ticker, timer or subscription keeps calling into a disposed object. Release it where the duty is discharged: `_focusNode.dispose();` in `dispose()` before `super.dispose()`.
Orphaned file lib/src/components/breadcrumb.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file scripts/generate_skills.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/neutral.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/yellow.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/violet.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/orange.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/stone.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/green.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/rose.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/gray.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/blue.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/color_scheme/red.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/src/theme/components/breadcrumb.dart:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:417— `Alignment.bottomRight || Alignment.bottomLeft || Alignment.bottomCenter` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:465— `Alignment.bottomRight || Alignment.topRight || Alignment.centerRight` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:444— `Alignment.centerLeft || Alignment.topLeft || Alignment.bottomLeft` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:435— `Alignment.centerRight || Alignment.topRight || Alignment.bottomRight` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:477— `Alignment.topLeft || Alignment.centerLeft || Alignment.bottomLeft` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sonner.dart:426— `Alignment.topRight || Alignment.topLeft || Alignment.topCenter` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sonner.dart, lib/src/components/toast.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/input.dart:147— `initialValue == null || controller == null` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/input.dart, lib/src/components/textarea.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart:391— `oldWidget.controller != null && widget.controller == null` appears character-identically in 3 files — lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart, lib/src/components/form/fields/radio.dart, lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/accordion.dart:169— `oldWidget.controller == null && widget.controller != null` appears character-identically in 5 files — lib/src/components/accordion.dart, lib/src/components/form/fields/input.dart, lib/src/components/form/fields/radio.dart, lib/src/components/form/fields/textarea.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/accordion.dart:347— `oldWidget.focusNode != null && widget.focusNode == null` appears character-identically in 3 files — lib/src/components/accordion.dart, lib/src/components/button.dart, lib/src/components/form/field.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/sheet.dart:1764— `side == ShadSheetSide.left || side == ShadSheetSide.right` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/sheet.dart, playground/lib/pages/sheet.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/input.dart:732— `widget.controller != null && oldWidget.controller == null` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/input.dart, lib/src/components/tabs.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/src/components/input.dart:730— `widget.controller == null && oldWidget.controller != null` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/src/components/input.dart, lib/src/components/tabs.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
README/code drift CONTRIBUTING.md:64— CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_variant` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift CONTRIBUTING.md:64— CONTRIBUTING.md names `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant`, but no file or folder `lib/src/theme/themes/default_theme_no_secondary_border_variant` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/README.md:36— docs/README.md names `src/assets/`, but no file or folder `src/assets` exists. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/src/content/docs/index.md:37— docs/src/content/docs/index.md links to `/flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png`, but `flutter-shadcn-ui/shadcn-banner.png` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/src/content/docs/packages.md:26— docs/src/content/docs/packages.md links to `../components/table`, but `docs/src/content/components/table` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
README/code drift docs/src/content/docs/packages.md:34— docs/src/content/docs/packages.md links to `../components/avatar`, but `docs/src/content/components/avatar` does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents' own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 4 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 5.0/10. The most over is `(repository root)` (38325 LoC, 259 module-visible types across 13 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Orphaned files with no living knowledge · ×1
Orphaned files with no living knowledge — 13 of 94 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left — their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 94 of the 139 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each — most significant first: lib/src/components/breadcrumb.dart, scripts/generate_skills.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/neutral.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/orange.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/violet.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/yellow.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/green.dart, lib/src/theme/color_scheme/stone.dart (and 5 more). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
M2 · Architecture documentation· No architecture diagram/doc · ×1
No architecture diagram/doc — No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
P10 · Library API & versioning· Large public API surface · ×1
Large public API surface — 259/334 types (78%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract — keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API.
No SAST — No static application security testing detected. For this repository's stack, add the Dart analyzer's security lints plus `semgrep --config=auto` as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 22454 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge's web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen — if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner.
No security response headers detected playground/firebase.json:1— None of the 11 security response headers the OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends (Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, …) is configured — defense in depth, even when a reverse proxy could set them. This is reported because `firebase.json` configures this repository's static hosting, including its response headers, so the configuration that would carry these headers is in this repository and was read in full. (−2.0 on this card.)
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a16926-d3fb-7898-b8e5-d32a68654837 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 6 · Warnings: 249 · Recommendations: 43 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 23-10-2026 @ 14:25 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.