Public report of notionnext-org/NotionNext, published 30 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 30 October 2026, 01:18 UTC · Survey ID cd_3936f9b75fd74805b07aeeaa959fb685
notionnext-org/NotionNext
Measured 30 October 2026, 01:13 UTC, at code version a2aa934
Regression: 2 dimensions fell since the last survey
A regression is a drop of 0.5 points or more in the score, or of 2.5 or more out of 10 in a dimension, since the last survey.
CAI scoreWeak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 3 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A large codebase: 112,854 lines of product code in 1 project, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.7 person-years · Weakest lens: Accessibility, 30
Findings by how serious they are
145 critical801 serious296 minor
14 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
30 October 2026, 01:13 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
83of 83 dimensions measured by tools.
1202of 1242 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 40 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
83dimensions across 7 lenses, read from 112,854 lines of product code in 1 project.
notionnext-org/NotionNext falls short of our standard for production, in part because it has hidden elements that the keyboard can still reach. It scores 37 out of 100 and is rated Weak, and 72 of its 145 critical findings are security problems.
Accessibility, at 30, is the weakest lens and counts most in the score. The best first step is making the controls keyboard-usable, worth about 4 points. Correcting the accessibility attributes comes next, worth about 3 points. Raising Accessibility to 70 would lift the score to about 42.
Twenty-eight pipeline tools are referenced by a changeable name, so the build pipeline can be tampered with. Nineteen known security holes in the packages the code depends on can be used by attackers, and eleven weaknesses in the code could be used by an attacker. Pinning each tool to an exact version, updating the vulnerable packages and fixing the weaknesses the scanner points to would close these risks. Setting a waiting period for automatic updates would fix the three automatic dependency updates that take new releases at once, and the three passwords or keys in the code's history need replacing, with the old ones switched off. Not hiding elements that the keyboard can reach would take care of the 40 hidden elements that the keyboard can still reach.
The product code is 112,854 lines, about €110,000 to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
If Accessibility rose from 30 to 70, the lowest score rated Strong, the score would rise from 37 to about 42.
Code composition: what the lines of code are
Product code 91%Tests 9%
New since the last survey: 113 findings
These 113 critical or serious findings weren't in the previous survey, on 16 October 2026. The first 100 are listed here, and the findings file in the download package lists them all.
Incompleteness & stubs · Guard cannot change the result — returns what the code already falls through to REDACTED
Incompleteness & stubs · Guard cannot change the result — returns what the code already falls through to lib/utils/clean.util.ts
Incompleteness & stubs · Both branches are identical — the condition decides nothing REDACTED
Incompleteness & stubs · Markup wires an event to an empty handler themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-colorblind.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-dimmed.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-high-contrast.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-light-colorblind.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-light.css
Visual & motion safety · Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard styles/globals.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard styles/notion.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css
Visual & motion safety · Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 595 findings
These 595 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 16 October 2026, and are gone from this one. The first 100 are listed here.
€35,000 to €180,000, for 585 to 1,855 hours of work, about 0.7 person-years for 1 to 2 engineers
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 37. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Large: 112,854 lines of product code
What it is not
Not a quotation: nobody has offered to build it for that. Not a valuation: it says nothing about what the business is worth. Not a certified figure: no professional has signed it as one.
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty. For this code, every line is priced as straight logic, which keeps the estimate on the low side.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
Use valid, non-abstract roles, supply the ARIA state each role requires, and never put aria-hidden on a focusable element.
Raises the score by about 3 points · Medium effort · ARIA correctness
3
Resolve the 100 FunctionTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with SocialButton.js (15), REDACTED (8), Header.js (5).
Raises the score by about 3 points · High effort · God Classes
Diagnosis: what the measurements show together
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €110,000 to build again, about 0.7 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Accessibility, at 30 (Weak). Accessibility is about whether the interface is built so that everyone can use it, including people who can't see the screen or can't use a mouse. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Accessibility also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Accessibility grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Accessibility actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 4 points for medium effort. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 5.4 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 7% to 15% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 27,267 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 110,583 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 18.2 to 109.3 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change, never less than 2% to 5% and never more than 40% to 60% in all; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
115 modules, with 6 dependencies between them. Every module uses only modules listed above it, so there are no loops.
The table shows the 40 modules with the most connections; 75 more are left out to keep it readable.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
components uses components.BeiAnGongAn, so a change to components.BeiAnGongAn can break components, while a change to components can't break components.BeiAnGongAn.
Position
Below the diagonal: components uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
lib.db.notion uses lib.db.notion.CustomNotionApi, so a change to lib.db.notion.CustomNotionApi can break lib.db.notion, while a change to lib.db.notion can't break lib.db.notion.CustomNotionApi.
Position
Below the diagonal: lib.db.notion uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
lib.site.adapters.notion uses lib.site.site_types, so a change to lib.site.site_types can break lib.site.adapters.notion, while a change to lib.site.adapters.notion can't break lib.site.site_types.
Position
Below the diagonal: lib.site.adapters.notion uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
lib.site.processors uses lib.site.site_types, so a change to lib.site.site_types can break lib.site.processors, while a change to lib.site.processors can't break lib.site.site_types.
Position
Below the diagonal: lib.site.processors uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
lib.site.site_api uses lib.site.site_types, so a change to lib.site.site_types can break lib.site.site_api, while a change to lib.site.site_api can't break lib.site.site_types.
Position
Below the diagonal: lib.site.site_api uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
At a glance — Code Health · 34% · Weak · gated by D1, D2, R1, X5 ·
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
97
High / Critical
A03:2025 — Software Supply Chain Failures
28
High / Critical
A07:2025 — Authentication Failures
4
High / Critical
A02:2025 — Security Misconfiguration
3
High / Critical
Roadmap
First, ensure all custom controls are fully keyboard-operable and anchors have valid hrefs to improve basic navigation. Next, correct ARIA roles and states while removing hidden focusable elements to guarantee screen reader compatibility. Then, refactor long functions in key components like SocialButton and Header to reduce complexity, and enforce visual safety standards by maintaining focus styles, respecting reduced motion preferences, and fixing color contrast. Finally, migrate the remaining JavaScript files to TypeScript to strengthen type safety across the codebase.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
The findings name the configuration each number was taken from and, for the assertions, the files that hold them. Turn null checking on where it is off — `"strict": true` in the base tsconfig that the others extend switches `strictNullChecks` on with the rest of the family — and then resolve the assertions rather than adding to them. A `!` on a value the checker could show to be null is a promise the author cannot check from where they are standing, and each one is a `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null` waiting for the path that makes it true; where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (narrow it with a test, make the property required, drop the `?`).
Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 233 files carrying findings, judged against the Production bar: 2% slop · 56% mixed · 42% near-clean.
File
Score
Band
Worst signal
REDACTED
0.0
Slop
Dependency Vulnerabilities: High CVE: REDACTED
REDACTED
1.8
Slop
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
2.0
Slop
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
2.3
Slop
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.0
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.4
Mixed
IaC & Container Security: High IaC: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.4
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.5
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.6
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.6
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
4.8
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.0
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.0
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.1
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.1
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.7
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.7
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.7
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): Medium: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.8
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
REDACTED
5.8
Mixed
Static Analysis (SAST): High: REDACTED
How the grades work
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 145
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 801
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 296
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 14
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 83 of 83 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); none rely on LLM judgement. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 83 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 1202 of 1242 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript half could not be measured — the dependency install for the repository root could not reach the package registry on this run (info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/install for documentation about this command.), so the suite never ran. Coverage is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo. In the meantime, commit (or publish into the working tree) the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces and the real number is read on the next scan. You can widen what we reach: optional: commit the lcov/Cobertura report your CI produces, and the real number is read on the next scan.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability NOT MEASURED: the JavaScript/TypeScript suite could not be re-run in the analyzer sandbox — the dependency install for the repository root could not reach the package registry on this run (info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/install for documentation about this command.), so the suite never ran. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repo — it is excluded from the score.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability for the jest suite in the repository root was NOT MEASURED: the dependency install for the repository root could not reach the package registry on this run (info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/install for documentation about this command.), so the suite never ran. This is OUR limitation, not a defect in the repository, and the suite is excluded from the measurement rather than counted against it.
D19 Documentation Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. Each ecosystem's manifests (what makes a folder runnable or a published package) need their own proof before D19 judges its units. Until then those folders' READMEs are judged only as documents (boilerplate, structure), never counted as complete.
D19 Documentation Quality — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. This kind did not reach the 95 % precision gate in three adjudicated runs (docs/plans/deterministic-engine/adjudication/D19-sample3-v3.md), so by the pre-registered fallback it publishes no row until a re-measurement shows it does. The candidates are counted here, not reported as findings, and the score does not include them.
D20 ADR Quality — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The ADR lexicon (adr-lexicon-1) covers de, en, it, nl. A record identified as another language, or whose language could not be identified (fewer than 25 words of prose, or no clear winner), is never read with English rules: its missing-section, status, consequence-cost and same-question rules abstain, and only the structural rules (title, single option, dangling link, enforcement field) run.
D21 Naming Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D21's deterministic naming rules are gated on C# first (docs/plans/deterministic-engine.md, P5): each other language is switched on only after its own concept suite and A/B gate pass. Until then its declarations carry no naming verdict this run — this says nothing about whether its names are consistent.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. D22 identifies the intentionally-exposed surface from `IsPackable` and `.Contracts` project names, MSBuild conventions read off the loaded project set. This target exposed no such projects, so the probe never ran; this says nothing about whether the repository has a public API. This repository commits no C#/VB source at all, so there was never an MSBuild project set to read these conventions off. That is OUR side and it is a COLLECTOR gap, not an environment fault: it declares a published package (public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/package.json), but no published-package marker D22 reads admitted any project here, so this ecosystem's public API has no collector, and the remedy is to write one — no change to the scan image can close it.
D24 Comment Value — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check's reader does not cover the language this repository's product is written in, so it had nothing of the product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding about this repository.
D27 Navigability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Navigability is taken over call sites whose callee resolved. For C# that population includes calls into referenced assemblies; for this language only calls declared inside the repository count, so the abstention threshold reads the repository's use of its standard library as a resolution failure. That is a limit of this analyzer, not a build problem in this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `public/js/lenis.js`, `scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs` produced a parse error, so every rule in this engine's `gdpr.yml` was absent there. That absence is NOT a clean result: these rules detect personal data crossing a boundary into a log sink, a URL or browser storage, and a file that was never parsed cannot report any of the three. The rest of the tree analysed normally and its rows above stand; only these files are unaccounted for. You can widen what we reach: fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover it.
AC5 ARIA correctness — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 9 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 49.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Render strategy: boot via REDACTED (REDACTED). docker build failed (exit 1) — ------ REDACTED:12 -------------------- 10 | WORKDIR /app 11 | COPY package.json REDACTED ./ 12 | >>> RUN yarn install --frozen-lockfile --network-timeout 600000 13 | 14 | # 2. Rebuild the source code only when needed -------------------- ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c yarn install --frozen-lockfile --network-timeout 600000" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1; runtime evidence skipped.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. '@supabase/supabase-js' is imported (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. '@supabase/supabase-js' is imported (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. '@supabase/supabase-js' is imported (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. '@supabase/supabase-js' is imported (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2), but no entity, schema, table or model declaration this check reads was found beside it, so whether personal data is stored could not be decided.
M4 Documentation accuracy — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. M4 checks only the claim kinds adjudicated at or above 95 % precision: links and versions (PREREGISTRATION version 9), and artefact counts an order of magnitude off. Paths, command arguments, installs, environment variables, settings, projects, packages, routes, cd targets, infrastructure products and removed modules are read but not checked, and none of them is reported or counted.
R10 Code Duplication — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 476 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 516.
R4 Test Coverage — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 77 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 117.
R7 Dead Code — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 144 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 184.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. 36 further occurrence(s) are not listed individually; the score already reflects all 76.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check reads C# syntax, and JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Python, PHP, Dart, Ruby, Scala and Rust source only, and no C# was loaded, and this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript, Python and PHP make no call through a named logger, so it had nothing of this repository's product to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D7 Architectural Integrity: Layering is checked against detected/declared rules — an architecture whose boundaries live in convention or in code review, not in a rule a scanner can read, is not enforced here.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality publishes two things only: a runnable or packaged unit with no example, and a multi-project root README that maps none of its parts. It does not judge clarity, and its other checks (overview, licence, boilerplate, structure, empty sections, XML-doc coverage) are withheld after adjudication: their candidates are counted in the card's gaps, not shown as rows. A false statement in a document is M4's; units are .NET projects only.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D31 IaC & Container Security: IaC scanning checks Dockerfiles/Terraform/Kubernetes against best-practice rules — it cannot see the live cloud account, runtime configuration, or drift between the committed config and what is actually deployed.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a REDACTED (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AC1 Text alternatives: Alt-text is detected structurally — the scan sees that an alternative EXISTS, not whether it meaningfully describes the image, and decorative-vs-missing is judged by attribute shape; runtime-injected images and a non-role=img decorative svg are out of scope. This is accessibility readiness, never a WCAG conformance claim.
AC2 Forms & labels: Label association is read from static markup — a label wired up at runtime (JS-set aria-labelledby, framework-injected ids) reads as missing, a present label says nothing about whether its text is correct. A known UI-library field component (e.g. a JSX <TextField>) is now checked conservatively — flagged only when it carries NO label/aria-label/aria-labelledby/id/name — but wrapper/context-labelled libraries (Chakra/Radix FormControl+FormLabel) aren't statically visible (possible false positive) and non-JSX lowercased components are still skipped. A click handler on a plain element is now asked for a name too (it is a control the author declared), but the subtree test that answers it is deliberately generous: any DYNAMIC text expression in the subtree counts as a name, so an icon chosen by a ternary ({cond ? <IconA/> : <IconB/>}) reads as named, and a glyph component from a library the icon-import list does not know still names its parent. A clean result is "no unlabelled control found", not a labelling proof.
AC3 Page structure: Page structure is read from the static markup tree — landmarks, headings and lang injected at runtime aren't seen, heading ORDER is checked structurally (not against the rendered visual hierarchy), and lang/title/main fire only on full documents, never partials, and the data-table check sees header-cell presence (a <th> exists), not whether each header correctly associates with its cells. Static readiness, not conformance.
AC4 Keyboard semantics: Keyboard semantics are inferred from markup attributes — interactivity wired purely in script, focus managed at runtime, and component-level handlers are invisible. A clean result means "no static keyboard-trap shape", not a keyboard-operability proof.
AC5 ARIA correctness: ARIA correctness is checked against the static role/attribute shape — roles/attributes set dynamically aren't seen, a valid role says nothing about whether it matches the element's real behaviour, and required-state checks are suppressed when a JSX spread could supply them. The two-branch toggle check (a control whose state is conveyed only by which of two mutually exclusive branches renders) reads CONDITIONALS THAT ARE ATTRIBUTES — Vue v-if/v-else/v-show and Alpine x-if/x-show — so the same toggle written as a Svelte {#if} block or a JSX ternary is control flow the markup model never projects as a branch and is not seen at all.
AC6 Visual & motion safety: Contrast and motion safety are PARTIAL by construction — literal colours (hex/rgb/hsl/named) in inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS top-level declarations are read (same-rule/same-element colour+background pairs only); computed/runtime/theme colour, external-CDN stylesheets, CSS-in-JS dynamic (${…}) and nested-selector colours, cross-element pairs and image contrast stay out of reach, so a clean result is bounded by what the static CSS itself shows.
AC7 A11y enforcement: Enforcement is scored from in-repo config/CI evidence only — an a11y gate enforced in external tooling with no in-repo trace can't be credited, and a configured linter is presence, not proof the rules actually run or block a merge.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
215 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas at 112. A further 10 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being filterCollectionViewData.matchesFilter at 34 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score. 4 files carry no cyclomatic complexity row at all for this reason — every one of their over-threshold methods was excluded, so the exclusion is disclosed nowhere in the file itself: REDACTED (ShareButtons::buildShareUrl at 25), REDACTED (ShareButtons.ShareButtons::buildShareUrl at 25), themes/endspace/components/menu.js (menu.normalizeIcon at 17), lib/server/notionOAuth.js (notionOAuth.completeNotionOAuth at 16). They are named here because the per-file figures other dimensions report are taken BEFORE this exclusion, so such a file can show a high maximum complexity elsewhere in this report and nothing here, with nothing to reconcile the two.
+ 116 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 12 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas (cyclomatic 112), ProfileHome.ProfileHome (cyclomatic 104), ProfileHome (cyclomatic 104). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 12 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 3.4 to about 4.8/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 135 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 11 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with ProfileHome.ProfileHome (cognitive 114), ProfileHome (cognitive 110), createMouseCanvas::value::t (cognitive 84). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 11 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 2.7 to about 4.4/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes5.4 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 100 FunctionTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with SocialButton.js (15), REDACTED (8), Header.js (5). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (100 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with server.js, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
What it measures: Whether the code respects its intended layering / architecture rules.
Method: Enforcement rung (Prevented/Verified/Documented) per checkable ADR via Roslyn, plus dependency cycles via the engine shared with D5/AX3. Deterministic, exact.
No mechanizable ADR was identified, so enforcement is not measured. Dependency cycles not checked (no project-reference graph; where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there).
Resolve the 5 Classify ADR enforcement finding(s) in Architectural Integrity — start with 2026-originality-proof-auto-manifest.md, 2026-originality-proof-ux.md, issue-2941-code-block-ui-refinement.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 recommendation-level).
Enforce Architectural Integrity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d7_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
529 test methods: 529 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e. The JavaScript/TypeScript suite contributes 529 `it`/`test` case(s) across 99 test file(s) declaring at least one; its tier split is read from package names and paths only.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D10 · Test Quality10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.
Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.
Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.
22 outdated direct production npm dependency(ies) of 29 graded, 0 pinning defect(s), across 2 package.json (2 of them the product) and 1 committed lockfile(s). Development dependencies are deliberately not graded for currency: that grade is about what SHIPS. 1 direct dependency(ies) — production, development or optional — are marked DEPRECATED by their publisher (the registry's per-version mark, or the lockfile's copy of it when the registry could not be asked); deprecated transitive packages are listed but not charged. Whether any is UNMAINTAINED is not graded — the registry publishes no maintenance status, and release age does not stand in for one. Whether any is UNUSED is not graded either: that is a source question, and the frontend dependency lens (R8) answers it in this same run. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question, read from the manifest there.
Resolve the 15 Deprecated finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene — start with REDACTED (15). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (15 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 2 Outdated (npm) finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene — start with package.json (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Deprecated finding(s) in Dependency Hygiene — start with package.json. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Dependency Hygiene in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 29 shipped npm package(s) use a banned license. Licences were resolved from registry.npmjs.org over the 29 production dependency(ies) this repository's committed lockfile resolves, across 2 product package.json manifest(s). Its 40 `devDependencies` declaration(s) are excluded: a consumer installs none of them. ★ DEPTH: this is the DIRECT production set the lockfile resolves, NOT the transitive closure — only one of the four lock dialects this pass reads states a full graph, so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is outside this verdict, exactly as the JVM arm's declaration-site verdict is. ★ Each licence is the one the registry publishes for the package's CURRENT release rather than for the pinned version, which is the same caveat the Hex and RubyGems arms carry. This repository publishes itself under MIT, which is its own choice and is not judged here.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Top hotspots: lib/db/SiteDataApi.js (7×42=294); REDACTED (3×66=198); components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js (3×65=195) Repeated repair below the complexity floor: themes/proxio/index.js (3 of 5 changes were fixes); themes/fuwari/components/ArticleLock.js (3 of 3 changes were fixes); pages/[prefix]/index.js (3 of 3 changes were fixes)
Resolve the 26 Repeated repair finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with ArticleLock.js (20), REDACTED (2), PostLock.js (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (26 warning-level).
Resolve the 20 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with SiteDataApi.js, REDACTED, AlgoliaSearchModal.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (20 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D16 · Bus Factor8.8 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").
Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.
58 source file(s) have their living knowledge concentrated in one author (≥90% of recent, decayed contribution). The largest is tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js. Counted over 472 of the 1251 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 · ×3
Further sole-owners (lower concentration)
What to do
Resolve the 3 Off-boarding risk finding(s) in Bus Factor. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Further sole-owners (lower concentration) finding(s) in Bus Factor. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
0 deducted task-comment markers across 2084 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Every README, docs/ document and root guide parsed by its markup and measured in Unicode letters. Published: a runnable or packaged .NET project whose README (or a document it links, or a root guide) shows no example, and a root README naming none of three or more projects. Overview, licence, boilerplate, wall-of-text, empty-section and XML-doc rows are measured and withheld (counted in gaps) after adjudication. Deterministic, exhaustive, advisory.
1 of 1 build units (npm) flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion
What to do
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: REDACTED scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
3 finding(s): 0 critical, 3 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
98 finding(s): 0 critical, 48 high, 36 medium, 14 low. 28 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens. semgrep hit a parse error in 2 file(s) — `public/js/lenis.js` (line 2), `scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs` (line 42, line 52, line 54) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them. Separately, one or more rules could not re-parse an embedded snippet in 2 file(s) (e.g. a workflow `run:` block read as shell). Those files WERE scanned and their other rows are unaffected; only those rules' view of those snippets is missing.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
+ 18 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 8 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (8). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (8 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 28 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (28 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir and Erlang via Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex (and Erlang, whose `rebar.lock` syft first converts to a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the lock), Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle (and Scala, whose sbt build's pinned direct declarations are written into a CycloneDX SBOM the scanner reads, with rows attributed back to the build file), npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
Resolve the 19 High CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (19). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (19 issue-level).
Resolve the 3 Medium CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Low CVE finding(s) in Dependency Vulnerabilities — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Resolve the 1 High IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Medium IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Low IaC finding(s) in IaC & Container Security — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d31_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
156 of 472 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is REDACTED. Counted over 472 of the 1251 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Orphaned knowledge · ×4REDACTED:1
Orphaned file · ×152themes/photo/index.js:1
Further orphaned files (smaller)
What to do
Resolve the 152 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with MenuItemCollapse.js (12), Catalog.js (10), SearchInput.js (10). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (152 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 4 Orphaned knowledge finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with REDACTED, REDACTED, mouse-follow.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Further orphaned files (smaller) finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 11 Change-coupling hub finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with REDACTED (5), [page].js (4), [[...index]].js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (11 warning-level).
Resolve the 7 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with ButtonFloatDarkMode.js (2), [...suffix].js, getAllCategories.js. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d36_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the repository publishes a coordinated-vulnerability-disclosure policy (SECURITY.md or security.txt) with a reporting contact, so finders know how to report a vulnerability. Presence of a policy file with a contact, not whether the policy is adequate or honoured.
Method: Vulnerability-disclosure policy read deterministically from the repo: a SECURITY.md (root/.github/docs) or .well-known/security.txt / security.txt, regex-checked for a reporting contact (email / URL / mailto). Present + contact → 10; present without a contact → 4; NotApplicable when no policy file exists (it may live off-repo). Detects the policy file's presence + contact, not its adequacy.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 2 platform declaration(s) and 29 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions
R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.
AC1 · Text alternatives10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Accessibility — Whether non-text content carries a text alternative — img/area/input[type=image] have alt, a meaningful svg has a title or aria-label, video has a captions track, and object/embed/canvas have a name or fallback content. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: every img/area/input[type=image] checked for alt, svg[role=img] for a title/aria-label, video for a captions <track>. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: image/media elements — img, area, input[type=image], svg, video, object, embed, canvas — across the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and dynamic-attribute elements are skipped. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is NOT read by any producer, so it contributes no element to this population; where such a frontend is present the card discloses it as an analyzer gap rather than scoring around it.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC2 · Forms & labels6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether form controls have a programmatic label (an associated label, aria-label or aria-labelledby), buttons have text, links have an accessible name, a click handler on a plain element names the control it declares, fieldsets have a non-empty legend, known UI-library field components carry a label prop, and a placeholder isn't used as the only label. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: inputs/selects/textareas checked for an associated label[for]/wrapping label/aria-label/aria-labelledby (per document), buttons for accessible text, fieldsets for a legend; placeholder-only labelling flagged. Deterministic, hard fact per control.
Coverage: Population: form controls, buttons, links, fieldsets and known UI-library field components in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx); components, hidden subtrees and spread/dynamic-attribute elements are skipped, so a control whose label arrives through a spread or a runtime expression is deliberately not judged. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label for>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label. — .vitepress/theme/components/DocsAssistant.vue:96
This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it. (×4) — REDACTED:546, REDACTED:549, REDACTED:550, …
What to do
Give every control a programmatic label (a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label) and every button text — a placeholder is not a label.
Other · Accessibility — Whether pages declare a language (well-formed BCP-47) and a non-empty title, expose exactly one main landmark and a sane heading order with non-empty headings, keep zoom enabled, title their iframes, give data tables header cells, and avoid meta-refresh. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: html lang, document <title>, a main landmark and heading order on full documents only, plus zoom-disabling viewports, untitled iframes and meta-refresh anywhere. Deterministic, per structural checkpoint.
Coverage: Population: the PARSED MARKUP documents (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx). The page-level checks — lang, title, single main landmark — fire ONCE PER FULL DOCUMENT (an <html> root) and never on a partial or component fragment, so a repo of fragments is assessed only on the per-element checks (heading order, table headers, iframe titles, meta-refresh, zoom). Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. This document's body is only the mount point <div id="dplayer-container">, so there is no content here to wrap — render the <main> from the component mounted into it. — public/dplayer.htm:2
No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>. (×2) — public/games-external/common/index.htm:2, REDACTED:2
An iframe with no title (or an empty one) is announced only as "frame". Add a non-empty title describing its content, or an aria-label. — public/games-external/common/index.htm:34
The page declares no language, so assistive tech can't pick the right pronunciation. Add lang (e.g. lang="en"). — REDACTED:2
What to do
Declare <html lang>, a document <title> and a <main> landmark, keep headings in order, leave zoom enabled, title iframes and drop meta-refresh.
Other · Accessibility — Whether interactive behaviour is keyboard-reachable — no click handler on a non-interactive element lacking a role, tabindex and key handler, no element the repo's own CSS styles `cursor: pointer` without giving it any of the three, no unfocusable element whose only binding is a mouse enter/leave pair or a double-click, no positive tabindex, no href-less anchor, no placeholder-href (#/javascript) link acting as a button. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: click handlers on non-interactive elements lacking role+tabindex+key handler, positive tabindex values, and href-less anchors. Components skipped, spreads suppressed. Deterministic, hard fact per element.
Coverage: Population: elements that pose a keyboard-semantics question, in the PARSED MARKUP files only (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx) — a non-natively-interactive element carrying a click handler, a double-click or hover enter/leave binding, a pointer-only gesture on a tabindex="0" element, or `cursor: pointer` from the repo's own CSS; an href-less or placeholder-href (#, javascript:) anchor; and any element with a positive tabindex. Natively interactive elements used correctly (<button>, <a href>, form controls) are NOT in the population — there is nothing to judge — so a page of nothing but correct controls gives AC4 nothing to measure. Keyboard reachability is judged from the markup, never from a rendered page. ★ An interactive element declared in a tagged-template (html`…`) or hyperscript frontend is NOT in this population — no producer reads either — so an empty population is reported as an analyzer gap, never as "this repository has no interactive elements".
An <a> with no href, role or tabindex isn't focusable or keyboard-activatable. Give it a real href, or use a <button> for an action. (×2) — REDACTED:317, REDACTED:555
What to do
Make custom controls keyboard-operable (role + tabindex + key handler), drop positive tabindex, and give anchors a real href.
Other · Accessibility — Whether ARIA is used correctly — valid non-abstract roles, the ARIA state a role requires, valid (non-misspelled) aria-* attribute names, in-enum values for token-typed aria-* attributes, and no aria-hidden on (or wrapping) a focusable element. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup-model scan: role values checked against the WAI-ARIA role set (abstract/invalid flagged), required ARIA state for a role, and aria-hidden on a focusable element. Deterministic, role/attribute level.
Coverage: Population: elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx) that carry a role or an aria-* attribute; roles and token values are checked against the ARIA enums exhaustively within that set. An expression-valued (dynamic) role or aria-* value is skipped rather than guessed, and markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable. (×40) — REDACTED:33, REDACTED:37, REDACTED:55, …
What to do
Use valid, non-abstract roles, supply the ARIA state each role requires, and never put aria-hidden on a focusable element.
Other · Accessibility — Whether focus outlines aren't removed without a replacement, motion respects prefers-reduced-motion, and literal CSS colour pairs meet contrast — PARTIAL: inline styles, in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files, var() tokens, Tailwind neutral utilities and CSS-in-JS literals are read (hex/rgb/hsl/named), never computed/runtime/external-CDN colour. Static markup readiness, not a WCAG conformance claim.
Method: Static markup/CSS scan: inline outline:none/0, literal inline colour/background contrast against the 4.5:1 AA floor, and <style>-block animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard. Deterministic but PARTIAL — only inline styles and in-repo CSS literals are visible.
Coverage: Population: styled elements in the PARSED MARKUP files (.html/.htm/.cshtml/.razor/.vue/.svelte/.jsx/.tsx), plus in-repo <style> blocks, in-repo .css files and CSS-in-JS literals. Colour contrast is computed from LITERAL colour pairs only (hex/rgb/hsl/named, including var() tokens and Tailwind neutral utilities) — computed, runtime-themed and external-CDN colour is never resolved, so this is a partial read of contrast by construction. Markup built in script — tagged-template (html`…`) UIs and hyperscript DOM factories — is not read at all.
`.markdown-body .pl-mi2` sets color: #f0f6fc on background-color: #318bf8 — 3.1:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them. — public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-high-contrast.css:943
`.notion *` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — styles/notion.css:111
`.notion details > summary` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — styles/notion.css:421
`.notion-toggle > summary` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. — styles/notion.css:1033
`.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible. (×7) — public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-colorblind.css:419, public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-dimmed.css:419, public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-high-contrast.css:419, …
`.lazy-image-placeholder` moves (`animation: l1 1s infinite linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — styles/globals.css:328
`.lazy-image-real.medium-zoom-image` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s cubic-bezier(0.2, 0, 0.2, 1),
opacity 400ms ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — styles/notion.css:1690
`.code-toolbar` moves (`transition: box-shadow 0.3s ease, transform 0.3s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/prism-mac-style.css:16
`.collapse-chevron` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/prism-mac-style.css:190
`.collapse-panel` moves (`transition: max-height 0.32s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/prism-mac-style.css:203
`.code-side-panel-drawer` moves (`transition: opacity 0.22s ease, transform 0.22s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/prism-mac-style.css:300
`.fadeInDown` moves (`animation-name: fadeInDown`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/wow/animate.css:66
`.fadeInLeft` moves (`animation-name: fadeInLeft`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/wow/animate.css:99
`.fadeInRight` moves (`animation-name: fadeInRight`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/wow/animate.css:132
`.fadeInUp` moves (`animation-name: fadeInUp`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce. — public/css/wow/animate.css:165
What to do
Keep a visible focus style (don't remove the outline without a replacement), guard animation with prefers-reduced-motion, and raise low-contrast colour pairs to at least 4.5:1.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AC7 · A11y enforcement4.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Accessibility — Whether accessibility is ENFORCED in the toolchain — an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set, e.g. eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y or vuejs-accessibility where the project lints JavaScript) and an automated accessibility assertion wired into tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or an equivalent) — on the Documented→Verified→Prevented ladder.
Method: Repo config/CI scan: an accessibility checker configured over the markup (an a11y lint rule set such as eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y / vuejs-accessibility where JavaScript is linted) and an automated accessibility assertion in tests or CI (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse or equivalent), graded on the Documented→Verified→Prevented rungs. Deterministic, presence/rung detection.
Coverage: Population: the repository's own tooling configuration — lint config, test and CI files — NOT the markup. It is read for a configured accessibility checker and an automated accessibility assertion (axe/pa11y/Lighthouse, or a native-toolkit equivalent), and it credits an INVOCATION, never a mention: a licence filename, an import comment or a doc reference earns no rung. Enforcement configured entirely outside the repository leaves no evidence here and cannot be credited.
No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 29 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
What to do
Enforce accessibility in the toolchain: add eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, then assert with jest-axe in tests, then gate axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in CI.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether interfaces stay focused rather than fat — the Interface-Segregation principle (SOLID 'I').
Method: Roslyn scan: public interface declared-member counts (accessors fold into their property/event); fat-interface threshold (over 15 declared members) flagged per type. Each finding also reports the distinct-OPERATION count — members counted by name, so an overload group counts once — which decides whether it states the caller-side ISP harm or the implementer-side burden of an overload set. TypeScript: exported interfaces that declare behaviour, counted over their REQUIRED operations (method signatures and function-typed properties with no `?`, once per signature) — data-shape interfaces and ambient .d.ts declarations are outside the population; JavaScript declares no interfaces and is not applicable. Deterministic, type-level.
Do you agree with this assessment?
C2 · Access Controls7.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether access is authorized by default — a framework authorization attribute/decorator or policy, or imperative guard methods (throw-on-violation) called from handlers.
Method: Roslyn scan: [Authorize] usage and authorization policies, plus imperative throw-on-violation guard methods detected via syntax. Deterministic.
Authorization IS enforced here (by route guards, auth middleware or checks that refuse a caller) — this is NOT a claim that endpoints are unprotected. What's missing is a NAMED rule set: who may do what is encoded inline where it is checked, so the rules can't be listed, reviewed or tested apart from the code that applies them. Recommendation, not a defect. — REDACTED:93
What to do
Name the access rules — roles/permissions declared once (a @Roles/@Permissions decorator with its guard, a CASL ability, a casbin model, or Supabase CREATE POLICY) and consulted where access is checked, so the rule set is reviewable and testable on its own.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions whose whole body still throws a "not implemented" error, and placeholder text (lorem ipsum, changeme/replace_me…) left in strings and JSX of non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords, in this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript: functions that only throw a "not implemented" error, functions that take inputs and return a constant or do nothing, async functions that never await, dead `if (false)` branches, and skeleton classes most of whose methods are holes.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
The guard above `return null;` also returns `null`, so no input can make it matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or delete the guard. — REDACTED:409
The guard above `return items;` also returns `items`, so no input can make it matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or delete the guard. — lib/utils/clean.util.ts:19
`main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work. (×2) — REDACTED:345, REDACTED:124
Both arms of this conditional expression are the same, so no input can make the condition matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or drop the condition. — REDACTED:16
`onClick` is wired to an arrow whose body is empty — the markup attaches a listener that does nothing. Implement the handler, or remove the attribute that wires it. — themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js:167
A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead. (×12) — components/FacebookMessenger.js:109, components/FlutteringRibbon.js:1, components/Sakura.js:1, …
`disconnect` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method. (×2) — jest.setup.js:57, jest.setup.js:65
`observe` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method. (×2) — jest.setup.js:58, jest.setup.js:66
`unobserve` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method. (×2) — jest.setup.js:59, jest.setup.js:67
What to do
Clear the softer debt: re-enable or delete skipped tests, decide whether each empty function is a deliberate no-op (and say so in a comment), and replace blanket `eslint-disable` / `@ts-nocheck` with targeted, justified suppressions.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.
Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P10 · Library API & versioning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Readiness · Readiness — For a library: a deliberate (small) public API surface and explicit semantic versioning so consumers can depend on it safely.
Method: Roslyn scan: public API surface area and semantic-versioning markers (SemVer attributes, changelog entries) for libraries; off .NET, a library is the ecosystem's publication act (an npm package that is not private and names an entry point, a PyPI distribution with a build system, a Rust library crate, a Maven/Gradle module that publishes, a Go module with no package main, a gemspec, a Composer library, a SwiftPM library product, a pub.dev or Hex package), its surface is the share of types the language model records as public (Rust, Swift, Java, Kotlin, Go, Dart; not measured where the model records no type visibility or, as in TypeScript, only module-level export), and its version is read from the manifest, a semver CHANGELOG, release tooling or semver git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P2 · Observability0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.
No logging call was found in the 1234 Python, JavaScript/TypeScript production file(s) this check read across 2 module(s). Each was searched for its ecosystem's logging libraries (Python: logging, structlog, loguru; JavaScript/TypeScript: pino, winston, bunyan, log4js, loglevel, consola, the NestJS Logger) and for a call on a receiver named `log`/`logger` (or ending in `Logger`/`_logger`) with a level verb. It cannot see logging through a repo-local wrapper named otherwise, or in source it did not read — this is 'no logging found by this walk', not a verdict that nothing here logs. If it is right, production issues will be hard to diagnose.
What to do
Adopt pino (or winston) and log at meaningful points in the services you run.
Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics (@opentelemetry/sdk-node) and a health-check endpoint (@godaddy/terminus or a /health route) for operability.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
Readiness · Performance — Whether asynchronous code stays responsive — it avoids sync-over-async blocking (a .NET .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult(), a time.sleep or blocking HTTP call inside a Python coroutine, a *Sync call inside an async JavaScript function, block_on inside a Rust async fn, runBlocking inside a Kotlin suspend function, block() inside a Reactor publisher) that stalls a thread or event loop and risks deadlock, and, where the code is a reusable library on .NET, awaits with ConfigureAwait(false) so it never captures and stalls its caller's context.
Method: Production-source scan: sync-over-async blocking counted everywhere — .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() in .NET; off .NET, read from the language model, a blocking call inside an async function (Python, TS/JS, Rust, Kotlin, Swift, Dart) or inside a Java method returning a Reactor Mono/Flux or a Scala method returning a Future or effect — and, for a .NET library with ≥5 awaits, the share of awaits using ConfigureAwait(false). Deterministic, syntax/text detection.
`fs.existsSync` in `waitForUnlock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/cache/file_lock.js:202
`fs.writeFileSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/cache/invalidation.js:66
`fs.renameSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/cache/invalidation.js:67
`fs.rmSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/cache/invalidation.js:69
`fs.existsSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:30
`fs.statSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:31
`fs.unlinkSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:35
`fs.writeFileSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:44
`fs.mkdirSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. — lib/utils/rss.js:160
`fs.writeFileSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs. (×3) — lib/utils/rss.js:161, lib/utils/rss.js:162, lib/utils/rss.js:163
What to do
TypeScript/JavaScript: use the promise APIs (fs/promises, a promisified child_process.execFile, the async zlib/crypto functions) and await them instead of the *Sync variants.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R1 · Type Safety0.1 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How much of the frontend is typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript.
Method: Frontend file inventory: the share of typed TypeScript vs untyped JavaScript across the source tree. Deterministic, exhaustive over frontend files.
12 typed · 1332 plain JS — the untyped files are __tests__/components/AlgoliaSearchModal.test.js, __tests__/components/CommentProviders.test.js, __tests__/components/LazyImage.test.js, __tests__/components/NewsletterForms.test.js, __tests__/components/NotionCollection.test.js, __tests__/components/NotionCollectionGallery.test.js (+1326 more).
What to do
Migrate the remaining .js/.jsx files to TypeScript.
React / JS · Code Health — Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm over JS/TS tokens, D-386): a block is reported only where its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or were renamed as they were pasted but kept most of their constants, and where the copies carry enough code to stand on their own or the copied extent reaches 30 lines — so a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are both found and deliberately not reported, and a clean R10 is not a claim that nothing was copied.
Method: Near-exact copy-pasted blocks of substantial extent across the frontend (the D4 clone algorithm run over JS/TS tokens). Masking finds the candidates; a block is reported when its copies still agree on most of their own identifiers and literals, or when a renamed copy still agrees on most of its constants, AND the copies carry enough code to stand on their own — or when the copied extent reaches 30 lines. So a re-implementation sharing neither names nor values, and a small pasted declaration, are deliberately not counted. Deterministic.
themes/proxio/ and themes/starter/ are near-verbatim copies of each other: 32 files are byte-identical under the same relative paths (~1871 lines; the trees hold 56 and 53 files). That is one structural fact, not 32 local ones: every edit made to one tree and not the other drifts silently, which is the failure whole-tree forks guarantee. Pick one tree as the single source and produce the other from it (generated, copied at build or release time, or re-exported) — or, if the copy is a stale snapshot nothing produces any more, delete it. Check first whether the copy is a deliberately published deliverable (a template consumers copy verbatim, a released sample frozen at a version); where it is, keep it produced from the source tree rather than edited in place. — themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1
themes/movie/ and themes/photo/ are near-verbatim copies of each other: 18 files are byte-identical under the same relative paths (~863 lines; the trees hold 32 and 36 files). That is one structural fact, not 18 local ones: every edit made to one tree and not the other drifts silently, which is the failure whole-tree forks guarantee. Pick one tree as the single source and produce the other from it (generated, copied at build or release time, or re-exported) — or, if the copy is a stale snapshot nothing produces any more, delete it. Check first whether the copy is a deliberately published deliverable (a template consumers copy verbatim, a released sample frozen at a version); where it is, keep it produced from the source tree rather than edited in place. — themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:1
410 duplicated blocks under themes/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories claude, commerce, endspace, fukasawa, fuwari, game (+19 more sibling(s) not listed) — 356 of them are reported below, and 54 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 410 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 410 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 410 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — themes/movie/index.js:3
19 duplicated blocks under the repository root have copies in at least two of the sibling directories components, lib, public, scripts, themes, tools — 12 of them are reported below, and 7 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 19 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 19 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 19 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — components/Collapse.js:29
8 duplicated blocks under pages/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories archive, category, page, search, sign-in, sign-up (+1 more sibling(s) not listed) — 7 of them are reported below, and 1 is counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 8 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 8 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 8 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on. — pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js:24
themes/movie/index.js:3 · themes/photo/index.js:3 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 221 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/movie/index.js:3
themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 207 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1
themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 203 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1
themes/simple/index.js:43 · themes/typography/index.js:46 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 935 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — themes/simple/index.js:43
REDACTED:143 · themes/hexo/index.js:186 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 707 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — REDACTED:143
themes/proxio/index.js:380 · themes/starter/index.js:349 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — themes/proxio/index.js:380
themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 147 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1
themes/commerce/components/SocialButton.js:10 · themes/plog/components/SocialButton.js:10 · themes/starter/components/SocialButton.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — themes/commerce/components/SocialButton.js:10
themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/gitbook/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/magzine/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 3 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 136 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:1
themes/claude/index.js:17 · themes/typography/index.js:25 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 800 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — themes/claude/index.js:17
themes/nobelium/index.js:192 · themes/plog/index.js:147 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — themes/nobelium/index.js:192
themes/proxio/components/SignUpForm.js:1 · themes/starter/components/SignUpForm.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 107 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/proxio/components/SignUpForm.js:1
themes/commerce/components/SearchInput.js:6 · themes/hexo/components/SearchInput.js:6 · themes/matery/components/SearchInput.js:6 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete. — themes/commerce/components/SearchInput.js:6
themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 · themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 · themes/photo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 — these 3 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 96 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1
themes/proxio/components/SearchInput.js:12 · themes/starter/components/SearchInput.js:12 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/proxio/components/SearchInput.js:12
themes/proxio/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/typography/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 85 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/proxio/components/SocialButton.js:1
themes/commerce/components/Catalog.js:13 · themes/hexo/components/Catalog.js:13 · themes/matery/components/Catalog.js:13 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete. — themes/commerce/components/Catalog.js:13
themes/next/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/simple/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 81 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done. — themes/next/components/SocialButton.js:1
themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:7 · themes/nobelium/components/SearchInput.js:7 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:7
themes/medium/components/SearchInput.js:5 · themes/simple/components/SearchInput.js:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/medium/components/SearchInput.js:5
themes/movie/components/SearchInput.js:7 · themes/photo/components/SearchInput.js:7 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/movie/components/SearchInput.js:7
themes/proxio/components/DarkModeButton.js:4 · themes/starter/components/DarkModeButton.js:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/proxio/components/DarkModeButton.js:4
themes/claude/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/simple/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/typography/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — themes/claude/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10
themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:9 · themes/nobelium/components/SearchInput.js:9 · themes/plog/components/SearchInput.js:8 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete. — themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:9
themes/gitbook/index.js:515 · themes/magzine/index.js:519 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. — themes/gitbook/index.js:515
themes/matery/index.js:230 · themes/medium/index.js:185 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 327 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — themes/matery/index.js:230
public/js/aos.js:220 · public/js/aos.js:362 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — public/js/aos.js:220
themes/nobelium/components/Nav.js:80 · themes/plog/components/Nav.js:47 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 325 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — themes/nobelium/components/Nav.js:80
themes/game/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/nobelium/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/plog/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — themes/game/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10
public/js/aos.js:142 · public/js/aos.js:295 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — public/js/aos.js:142
functions/api/ai-chat.ts:46 · functions/api/docs-chat.ts:65 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 484 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — functions/api/ai-chat.ts:46
pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:22 · pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:25 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 384 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one. — pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:22
themes/movie/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/photo/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — themes/movie/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10
themes/claude/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5 · themes/typography/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are. — themes/claude/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5
themes/magzine/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:37 · themes/medium/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:32 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported. — themes/magzine/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:37
What to do
Act on each finding's own remediation rather than one rule: the move depends on what recurs. Where the copies are executable blocks, give the shared part one home and call it from each site; where they are declarations, a listing, a specialisation already delegating to its base, or one shape repeated per entity, there is no call site and the move is a shared type, a generated set or a factory — sometimes there is nothing to extract.
React / JS · Architecture — Conformance to the detected frontend architecture layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules (D-386).
Method: Conformance to the detected frontend layout (feature-sliced / layered src) plus cross-package deep-import rules, over the module graph. Deterministic.
components/NotionCollection.js:2 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/collection, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead. — components/NotionCollection.js:2
components/NotionPage.js:286 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/code, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead. — components/NotionPage.js:286
components/NotionPage.js:342 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/modal, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead. — components/NotionPage.js:342
What to do
Fix the listed violations: import through public entries (package exports / slice index), never reach into another layer or package's internals.
React / JS · Code Health — Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from the token-level function scanner (D-386) — real branching, not a regex heuristic.
Method: Per-function cyclomatic/cognitive complexity from a token-level function scanner (real branching, not a regex heuristic), computed over every frontend function. Deterministic.
_go2 has cyclomatic complexity 67 and cognitive complexity 53; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:1402
t has cyclomatic complexity 59 and cognitive complexity 84; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — public/js/mouse-follow.js:200
ExternalPlugin has cyclomatic complexity 51 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:22
(top-level) has cyclomatic complexity 47 and cognitive complexity 46; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — conf/comment.config.js:5
siteConfig has cyclomatic complexity 45 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — lib/config.js:17
readNotionPropertyValue has cyclomatic complexity 41 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1032
translateOnePage has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 44; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — scripts/translate/pipeline.js:33
(top-level) has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 38; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:3
output has cyclomatic complexity 38 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:831
SEO has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 34; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — REDACTED:15
handler has cyclomatic complexity 35 and cognitive complexity 34; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — pages/api/revalidate.js:16
renderBlock has cyclomatic complexity 33 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:175
parseConfigFromPage has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — lib/db/notion/getNotionConfig.js:87
collectRevalidationPaths has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — lib/server/revalidation.js:35
resolvePostProps has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:383
EndspacePlayer has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 36; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:220
validateObject has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — lib/middleware/security.js:124
buildPropertyBySchema has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 27; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:770
What to do
Break down the listed branch-heavy functions; aim P95 cyclomatic ≤ 5.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R3 · Large Files8.9 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — How many source files exceed the large-file threshold.
Method: Components/modules exceeding the large-file threshold, counted exhaustively across the frontend source tree. Deterministic.
themes/claude/style.js has 2640 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/claude/style.js:1
REDACTED has 1674 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js has 1671 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1
themes/opc/index.js has 1223 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/opc/index.js:1
lib/db/SiteDataApi.js has 1024 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:1
themes/endspace/style.js has 984 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/endspace/style.js:1
REDACTED has 876 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
components/ThemeSwitch.js has 752 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — components/ThemeSwitch.js:1
public/js/mouse-follow.js has 699 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — public/js/mouse-follow.js:1
public/js/aos.js has 671 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — public/js/aos.js:1
components/PrismMac.js has 649 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — components/PrismMac.js:1
conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js has 612 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js:1
themes/fuwari/style.js has 591 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/fuwari/style.js:1
themes/magzine/index.js has 574 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/magzine/index.js:1
themes/gitbook/index.js has 568 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/gitbook/index.js:1
REDACTED has 564 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
REDACTED has 554 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
themes/proxio/index.js has 543 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/proxio/index.js:1
themes/starter/index.js has 519 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/starter/index.js:1
themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js has 518 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:1
themes/endspace/index.js has 491 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/endspace/index.js:1
REDACTED has 480 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — REDACTED:1
themes/heo/index.js has 464 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/heo/index.js:1
themes/photo/index.js has 457 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/photo/index.js:1
components/TechGrow.js has 452 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — components/TechGrow.js:1
themes/movie/index.js has 452 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/movie/index.js:1
lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js has 451 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js:1
components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js has 444 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:1
lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js has 438 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:1
themes/nav/index.js has 432 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/nav/index.js:1
themes/next/index.js has 430 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/next/index.js:1
themes/game/index.js has 427 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/game/index.js:1
themes/hexo/index.js has 417 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/hexo/index.js:1
themes/medium/index.js has 413 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module. — themes/medium/index.js:1
What to do
Split each oversized file along the responsibilities already in it, into smaller focused modules in the same package.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R4 · Test Coverage9.1 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Static test reachability (D-386): the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything.
Method: Static test reachability: the share of production files reachable from any test via the import graph — measured without running anything. Deterministic.
No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one. (×40) — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1, components/ThemeSwitch.js:1, public/js/mouse-follow.js:1, …
What to do
Add tests that import the unreached modules (directly or through their public entry).
Do you agree with this assessment?
R6 · Tooling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Readiness — Whether the project wires up test, lint and typecheck — detected from each package.json script's COMMAND (eslint / tsc / vitest / jest / playwright), not just its name, and corroborated against CI-workflow invocations so a tool run only in CI still counts.
Method: package.json scanned for test/lint/typecheck script wiring. Deterministic presence check.
Do you agree with this assessment?
R7 · Dead Code7.3 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
React / JS · Code Health — Files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point, and exports nothing imports (module-graph reachability, D-386).
Method: Dead code: files unreachable from every application/tooling/test entry point plus exports nothing imports, via module-graph reachability. Deterministic, exhaustive over the import graph.
Unreachable from the 94 application, 42 tooling and 99 test entry point(s) detected in this repo. Gate removals on `yarn run build` — an undetected custom entry would make these reachable.
no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make (×18) — lib/middleware/security.js, lib/config/env-validation.js, lib/utils/sitemap.js, …
Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal. (×21) — components/HeroIcons.js:24, components/HeroIcons.js:72, lib/cache/cache_manager.js:189, …
What to do
Delete the dead files and unused exports — every line is maintenance cost and rebuild-estimate inflation with zero runtime value.
React / JS · Readiness — npm dependency truthfulness (D-386): unused dependencies, imports not declared anywhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps.
Method: npm dependency truthfulness: unused dependencies, imports declared nowhere, and type-/test-only packages shipped as production deps — from the manifest + import graph. Deterministic.
Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident. (×7) — __tests__/components/NotionPageZoom.test.js:2, scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:5, components/KatexReact.js:1, …
Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members — no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it. (×3)
What to do
Remove unused dependencies, declare unlisted imports explicitly, and demote type-/test-only packages to devDependencies.
React / JS · Architecture — Import cycles in the module graph (D-386) — files that can only be understood and changed together.
Method: Import cycles in the module graph, detected exhaustively over JS/TS imports (the same cycle detection as the .NET coupling dimension). Deterministic.
themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js → themes/fukasawa/components/SearchInput.js → themes/fukasawa/index.js → themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 4 files) — themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js:17
themes/game/components/GameListRecent.js → themes/game/index.js → themes/game/components/GameListRecent.js (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 5 files) — themes/game/components/GameListRecent.js:5
themes/gitbook/components/BottomMenuBar.js → themes/gitbook/index.js → themes/gitbook/components/BottomMenuBar.js (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 6 files) — themes/gitbook/components/BottomMenuBar.js:2
Other · Security — Read from this repository's JavaScript/TypeScript source: cryptographic hygiene (weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source) and outbound TLS (certificate validation, protocol version) — facts about code that hold whether or not it serves anything itself. Markup this repository SHIPS is scored for third-party script integrity whether or not the repository serves it itself, since a page handed to a consumer runs in that consumer’s origin. This repository commits the configuration that serves its own HTTP surface, so that configuration was read in full for the security response headers it sets. The server controls — HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, cookie flags, input validation — are NOT assessed for JavaScript/TypeScript: each is scored as an absence, an absence is only reportable over the production HTTP server, and in this ecosystem the file that opens the port is build output or a framework launcher rather than a file in the source tree. Their absence here is not a finding about this repository.
Method: Roslyn plus filesystem scan: HSTS/security headers, secure cookies, input validation, middleware order, weak crypto (MD5/SHA1/DES); HTTPS-metadata context-aware. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript, Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir source itself (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not) for the arms that hold whether or not the code serves HTTP: a weak hash or cipher, key material fixed in the source, a TLS client that accepts any certificate, and (JavaScript/TypeScript, Ruby, Scala, Rust and Elixir) an obsolete TLS version; the server controls are not assessed there, and a Dart, Ruby, Scala, Rust or Elixir repository that serves no HTTP of its own is N/A on them. Deterministic.
`OPS_COOKIE_SALT` is the key-derivation salt and is a compile-time constant, so the secret this operation depends on is published with the source. A key that ships with the source is not secret: every contributor, fork, mirror and released binary carries it, so anyone holding the repository can decrypt what any installation encrypted, and there is no way to invalidate what was already protected because every deployment built from this source shares the value. Where the constant is a password salt the consequence differs but is no smaller — one global salt means precomputation amortises across every installation, which is the property salting exists to destroy. Read the value from configuration, an environment variable or a secrets manager at startup and FAIL FAST when it is absent, so a missing key stops the process instead of silently falling back to a shared default; treat the committed value as disclosed and rotate it rather than only deleting the line. For a salt, generate a fresh random one per password and store it alongside the hash. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:15
MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`createHash("sha256")`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call. (×3) — lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:51, themes/nobelium/components/ArticleInfo.js:13, themes/plog/components/ArticleInfo.js:13
This code fixes scrypt at N=16,384 (r=8, p=1), Node's default. A key-derivation function's only defence is the cost of ONE guess, and that cost is this number — the algorithm choice does not set it. Current OWASP guidance is 1,300,000 PBKDF2 iterations with HMAC-SHA1, 600,000 with SHA-256 and 210,000 with SHA-512; scrypt at N=2^17, r=8, p=1 (or an equivalent N·r·p product); Argon2id at 19 MiB of memory and 2 iterations (or an equivalent row); bcrypt at a work factor of at least 10. This figure divides the attacker's work by a factor of tens or hundreds against the same stolen hash, on hardware they already own. Where what is derived is short or low-entropy — a PIN, a numeric parental code, a four-character token — the whole keyspace falls in the time this parameter buys, and no salt or constant-time comparison changes that. Raise the count to the current published figure for the PRF you use, measure it on the slowest hardware that must run it (a target of roughly 100 ms per derivation is the usual budget), and read the value from configuration so a deployment can raise it again without a rebuild. Where the derived value must interoperate with a format someone else fixed, the count cannot move — derive a SEPARATE value for anything you own rather than inheriting the external format's price. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1570
`https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hls.js@latest` is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request — the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path — runs arbitrary script in this page's origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time — the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository. 2 such include(s) across the repository's markup. — public/dplayer.htm:30
What to do
Load cryptographic key and salt material from configuration, an environment variable or a secrets manager rather than fixing it in the source, and fail fast at startup when it is absent — a default that silently works is the one that reaches production. Rotate anything already committed: it must be treated as disclosed. Salts should be generated per password and stored with the hash, never shared across installations.
Review each MD5/SHA1 use by what it protects: replace it with SHA-256+ (or a KDF for passwords) where the digest is security-relevant, and switch it to a non-cryptographic hash (xxhash, murmurhash) where it only derives an identifier such as a cache key. This repository constructs a collision-broken hash (MD5/SHA1) at 3 sites, not one: `lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:51` (js-md5), `themes/nobelium/components/ArticleInfo.js:13` (js-md5), `themes/plog/components/ArticleInfo.js:13` (js-md5). Each is a separate decision — fixing only the line this row cites leaves the others in place.
Raise the cost parameter to current guidance — PBKDF2 at 1,300,000 (HMAC-SHA1), 600,000 (SHA-256) or 210,000 (SHA-512) iterations; scrypt at N=2^17, r=8, p=1; bcrypt at a work factor of 10 or more — or move to a memory-hard KDF (Argon2id, scrypt) where the platform offers one. Read the parameter from configuration and tune it to roughly 100 ms per derivation on the slowest hardware that must run it, so the price can be raised again without shipping new code.
Pin third-party scripts and verify them: name an exact version in the URL and add an `integrity="sha384-…"` hash alongside `crossorigin="anonymous"` (both are required — an integrity hash on a cross-origin script without `crossorigin` is not evaluated, it blocks the script). Where the vendor ships a continuously-updated loader and publishes no stable hash (tag managers, analytics, chat widgets), Subresource Integrity is not available: constrain it instead with a `Content-Security-Policy` that names the exact origins allowed to execute, and drop the script from the pages that do not need it. Where the page is shipped inside a package that others host, prefer vendoring the asset and serving it from the app’s own origin, so no consumer inherits a third-party dependency they did not choose.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document2.7 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`deepClone` is exported and takes `obj: object` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 286 (`deepClone`) with a piece of `obj` (and at line 294) — and nowhere in `deepClone` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. JavaScript sets no limit of its own on that nesting: `JSON.parse` accepts any depth, so a 100,000-byte body — inside Express's default 100kb limit — parses to 50,000 levels, and a walk like this one throws `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` long before it reaches the bottom. Wherever that throw lands, the work fails: a request errors, and a walk running outside any `try` — an event handler, a timer, a promise nobody awaits — takes the Node process down with every other request in flight. Thread a depth argument through `deepClone` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack. — lib/utils/index.js:286
`deepSanitizeObject` is exported and takes `obj: object` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 302 (`this.deepSanitizeObject`) with a piece of `obj` (and at line 307) — and nowhere in `deepSanitizeObject` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. JavaScript sets no limit of its own on that nesting: `JSON.parse` accepts any depth, so a 100,000-byte body — inside Express's default 100kb limit — parses to 50,000 levels, and a walk like this one throws `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` long before it reaches the bottom. Wherever that throw lands, the work fails: a request errors, and a walk running outside any `try` — an event handler, a timer, a promise nobody awaits — takes the Node process down with every other request in flight. Thread a depth argument through `deepSanitizeObject` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack. — lib/utils/validation.js:302
What to do
Each finding names the externally-callable member that accepts the document and the self-call that descends, and states that no depth parameter or counter exists anywhere in the walk. Confirm from the two, then thread a depth argument through the walk and reject documents past a fixed maximum, or rewrite it with an explicit stack.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether async functions that make a cancellable request accept or pass on an AbortSignal (adoption curve).
Method: Roslyn scan: every async method (excluding framework-fixed overrides/Blazor handlers) checked for CancellationToken parameter presence. Deterministic, adoption percentage. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same question: every named async function that itself makes a request an AbortSignal can cancel (global `fetch`, axios and its file-local instances, ky, ofetch) counts, and it is compliant when its parameters or body name a signal or it hands one of its own parameters to the request as options; signatures a framework fixes (JSX event handlers, route and lifecycle exports, request-first handlers, `override`, `'use server'` modules, TanStack `mutationFn`) are exempt unless they take a signal. Deterministic, adoption percentage.
Only 1/14 async functions that make a cancellable request (fetch, axios, ky, ofetch) accept an AbortSignal or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a page navigated away from, an unmounted component, a timed-out job. Take a `signal` (or an options object that carries one) and hand it to the request; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
`notionRequest` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1005
`refreshSiteCache` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1559
`fetchPage` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:240
`download` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — scripts/localize-legacy-images.mjs:42
`fetchArticle` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:107
`downloadImages` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:130
`getAiSummary` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — lib/plugins/aiSummary.js:8
`subscribeToNewsletter` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — lib/plugins/mailchimp.js:47
`postNotion` awaits `axios.post(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `axios.post(url, { signal })`. — lib/db/notion/CustomNotionApi.ts:17
`fetchHtmlArtifactContent` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — REDACTED:327
`fetchMembersFromOfficialAPI` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — lib/db/notion/memberDataSource.js:117
`fetchCounts` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — components/WebMention.js:24
`fetchMentions` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`. — components/WebMention.js:80
What to do
Thread an AbortSignal through async functions that make requests, so the work stops when its caller gives up.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped2.7 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
`label` carries text this program read out of a document — an attribute or a text node, which the DOM hands back already decoded, so an entity its author wrote is a live character again — and it is written straight into the text of an element of markup built here with nothing escaping it on the way. The value is chosen by whoever authored that document, not by this program, so it can close the attribute or element it sits in and open another — a crafted document becomes markup in what this code renders. Escape `label` at this site, or validate it against the shape the position accepts before interpolating it. — components/PrismMac.js:566
``
window.chatbaseConfig = {
chatbotId: "${CHATBASE_ID}",
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:311
``
(function(c, l, a, r, i, t, y) {
c[a] = c[a] || function() {
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:326
``
daovoice('init', {
app_id: "${COMMENT_DAO_VOICE_ID}"
});
d…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:377
``
((window.gitter = {}).chat = {}).options = {
room: '${COMMENT_GITTER_ROOM}'
}…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:427
``
var _hmt = _hmt || [];
(function() {
var hm = document.createElement("script");
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:442
``
document.write(unescape("%3Cspan style='display:none' id='cnzz_stat_icon_${ANALYTICS_CNZZ_ID}'%3E%3C/span…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:460
``
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:482
``
var _paq = window._paq = window._paq || [];
_paq.push(['trackPageView']);
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:500
`pageId` is text this program did not author, and it is written into a quoted attribute value through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:204
`refAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:205
`minimizedAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:206
`themeColorAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:207
`loggedInGreetingAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:208
`loggedOutGreetingAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:209
`greetingDialogDisplayAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:210
`greetingDialogDelayAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value. — components/FacebookMessenger.js:211
`state.innerHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — components/KatexReact.js:53
`codeHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — components/PrismMac.js:386
`JSON.stringify(generateStructuredData(meta,siteInfo,url,image,AUTHOR,LINK))` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:264
`v` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:226
`darkModeScript` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — pages/_document.js:106
`newHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:118
`locale.COMMON.PASSWORD_ERROR` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×6) — themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js:21, themes/commerce/components/ArticleLock.js:20, themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js:21, …
`comment.comment` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. (×5) — themes/claude/components/ExampleRecentComments.js:28, themes/commerce/components/HexoRecentComments.js:37, themes/game/components/ExampleRecentComments.js:28, …
`content` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — themes/claude/components/TopBar.js:14
`siteConfig('COMMERCE_FOOTER_RIGHT_TEXT','',CONFIG)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — themes/commerce/components/Footer.js:180
`post?.summary` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — REDACTED:269
`index` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `insertAdjacentHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — themes/gitbook/index.js:273
`siteConfig('LANDING_FEATURES_HEADER_1_P',null,CONFIG)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — themes/landing/components/Features.js:37
`siteConfig('LANDING_FEATURES_BLOCK_P',null,CONFIG)` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup. — themes/landing/components/FeaturesBlocks.js:18
What to do
Each finding names the expression, the attribute it lands in and the line. Confirm the value's origin from the read this analyzer traced, then escape it at the sink or validate it against the shape the attribute accepts before interpolating.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `for` loop leaves the `dict`, `set` or `deque` it is walking alone — CPython's iterators over those check that the collection has not changed size since the loop began, so a body that removes from (or empties) the very collection the loop is walking makes the next step raise `RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration` and the remaining items are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
`.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it. (×8) — themes/xuhome/components/AudioPlayer.js:24, themes/matery/components/Hero.js:42, themes/hexo/components/Hero.js:48, …
An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it. (×24) — themes/claude/components/DarkModeButton.js:35, scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:148, public/js/cusdis.es.js:32, …
`catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter. — lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:87
What to do
Swallowed exception (empty catch)
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether strict null checking is enabled and not undermined by heavy `!` assertion — TypeScript's `strictNullChecks` (which `strict` turns on) is what makes `string` exclude `null` and `undefined`, and the postfix `!` is the operator that silences it.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
0/2 of this repository's type-checking configuration(s) turn on strict null checking (`"strict": true`, or `"strictNullChecks": true`). A configuration that states neither is counted as OFF, because off is tsc's own default; a solution-style one whose `"files"` is empty and whose `"references"` point at other projects is in neither number, because it checks no source itself. Where it is off, `string` admits `null` and `undefined`: passing a value that is null compiles silently and throws on the first property access.
~0.4 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 1 assertion(s) across the 2271 source line(s) of the 25 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts (1). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
What to do
The findings name the configuration each number was taken from and, for the assertions, the files that hold them. Turn null checking on where it is off — `"strict": true` in the base tsconfig that the others extend switches `strictNullChecks` on with the rest of the family — and then resolve the assertions rather than adding to them. A `!` on a value the checker could show to be null is a promise the author cannot check from where they are standing, and each one is a `TypeError: Cannot read properties of null` waiting for the path that makes it true; where the value genuinely cannot be null, say something the checker can see instead (narrow it with a test, make the property required, drop the `?`).
Do you agree with this assessment?
WCAG coverage — what static analysis assessed
Statically assessed 15 of 55 WCAG 2.2 Level A/AA success criteria (27%; ≈30% of the 50 WCAG 2.1 AA criteria for EN 301 549). The other 40 require runtime or manual evaluation. Partial signal only (a clean result is necessary, not sufficient; static analysis fully verifies none). This is accessibility readiness, not a conformance claim — a WCAG conformance claim requires manual evaluation (WCAG-EM 1.0).
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Unscored — 3 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
X10 Duplicated predicate — 25 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — 6 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score.
Not evidenced — 4 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: this repository stores data through '@supabase/supabase-js' (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether its changes need an audit trail could not be established, and the trail's absence is not scored.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: this repository stores data through '@supabase/supabase-js' (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether a retention limit applies here could not be established, and its absence is not scored.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: this repository stores data through '@supabase/supabase-js' (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so whether data-subject rights apply here could not be established, and their absence is not scored.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 42 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AX1 Captive dependencies — Not applicable: this repository's JavaScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's; this repository's TypeScript imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's; this repository's Python imports no dependency-injection container and defines no container of its own — nothing that both registers and resolves bindings, and nothing that names two lifetimes — so nothing holds one lifetime's instance while handing out another's.
AX2 Stateful singletons — No container singleton was found, so there is no shared instance for concurrent requests to race on. No function in this Python code is served by a threaded web framework (a Flask, Bottle or FastAPI route, a Django or Pyramid view), so no module is shared between request threads. TypeScript/JavaScript runs each process's requests on one event loop, so no two requests write a shared object at the same instant (interleaving across an await is a different defect).
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
AXR1 Runtime accessibility — docker build failed (exit 1) — ------ REDACTED:12 -------------------- 10 | WORKDIR /app 11 | COPY package.json REDACTED ./ 12 | >>> RUN yarn install --frozen-lockfile --network-timeout 600000 13 | 14 | # 2. Rebuild the source code only when needed -------------------- ERROR: failed to solve: process "/bin/sh -c yarn install --frozen-lockfile --network-timeout 600000" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1; runtime evidence skipped This is a statement about this run, not a statement about your application: nothing here says the surface is inaccessible, only that it was never rendered.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: this repository stores data through '@supabase/supabase-js' (lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:2) but declares no persisted model this check reads (TypeORM/MikroORM/sequelize-typescript/NestJS-Mongoose entities, Mongoose schemas, Sequelize or Drizzle tables, Knex migrations, Prisma models). Personal data may be written through raw SQL or a hosted backend, so the absence of a personal-data field here is not evidence that none is stored, and encryption at rest is not scored over a subject that could not be established.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not measured — JavaScript/TypeScript suite did not run
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D20 ADR Quality — 5 ADR(s) are written in a language our ADR lexicon does not cover, or are too short to tell (undetermined); their sections and statuses were not judged.
D21 Naming Consistency — Naming consistency is measured on C# only; JavaScript, Python, TypeScript not measured.
D22 Internal API Consistency — The exposed public-API surface could not be collected — no C#/VB projects loaded.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — No bounded-context organisation was detected either — neither a context-shaped layout, nor 2+ sibling source directories each declaring an aggregate root, nor 2+ sibling projects each declaring an entity of their own or taking another project's integration events. Declaring this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — D24 reads C# and Visual Basic comments only — this repository's production source is .mts, .py, .ts, .tsx, which was left unread. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D25 ADR Conformance — None of 0 binding record(s) states a rule in checkable form (a backticked element with a prohibition, or an `adr-rules` block), so conformance cannot be read from the code. Write the rule as an `adr-rules` block (`forbid:` a symbol, a package or a dependency) to make it checkable.
D27 Navigability — D27 counts a call into the standard library or a dependency as unresolved for this repository's language (.js,.mjs,.ts,.tsx), so too few call sites counted as resolved to assess navigability. Not scored: this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — 2 file(s) were not parsed by semgrep — the PII/GDPR ruleset never ran over them
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D4 Code Duplication — This repository's production source (.js, .mjs, .mts, .ts, .vue) is not read by D4's token comparison, which compares .NET source: duplication in it is measured by R10 Code Duplication, the frontend lens's card running the same clone algorithm over the JS/TS token stream. Not scored here — read the R10 card for this repository's duplication.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D5 Coupling — Not applicable — this npm build ships 1 production module(s), so there is no coupling BETWEEN modules to measure. (Its test and non-production modules are not part of the shipped graph.)
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured — JavaScript/TypeScript suite
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — no HTTP server, API framework or worker entry point was found in the JavaScript/TypeScript, Python source, so there is no service whose uptime a failing dependency could take down
P8 Schema migrations — no ORM, schema-migration tool or schema auto-create was found in this repository's dependency manifests or source, so there is no database schema for this check to judge
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (lcov — `jest --coverage --coverageReporters=lcovonly`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Not applicable: no benchmark suite was found. This check searched for tinybench, mitata, benchmark.js, benny or vitest `bench(...)` calls in files that import them (or `*.bench.*` files), or one of those in a package.json, and for a `*benchmark*` script that this repository's CI runs. Benchmarks are credited as a bonus, so their absence is neither scored nor deducted.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Not applicable: TypeScript/JavaScript runs on a garbage-collected runtime that gives a program no allocation-control idiom to choose on a hot path — no pools, stack allocation or value types — so allocation awareness is not something this code can be rated on.
R5 Dependency Freshness — uses a yarn lockfile — dependency freshness not measured here; JS/npm CVEs are scored in D30 (Dependency Vulnerabilities), which answers every ecosystem
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check asks whether an argument guard reports an EMPTY value as a NULL one, which needs a language that throws a null-specific argument exception — .NET's ArgumentNullException, the JVM's NullPointerException, Dart's ArgumentError.notNull. This repository contains none of those languages: the ones it is written in have a single exception for a bad argument, so there is no pair of exceptions to confuse and nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check is about how a .NET program searches the assemblies loaded into its process for a type, and this repository contains no .NET source, so there is nothing here for it to assess. Not a gap in the analyzer and not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Critical — 145 finding(s)
AC5 · ARIA correctness· aria-hidden on a focusable element · ×40
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:33— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:37— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:55— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:57— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:59— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:61— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:63— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:65— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:69— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:71— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:75— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:96— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:247— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:253— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:292— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:315— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:354— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:423— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:446— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:469— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:502— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:527— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:543— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:557— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
aria-hidden on a focusable element REDACTED:613— aria-hidden="true" hides the element from assistive tech but leaves it keyboard-focusable — a confusing dead stop. Remove aria-hidden or make the element non-focusable.
Import cycle (3 files) themes/plog/components/BlogListPage.js:6— themes/plog/components/BlogListPage.js → themes/plog/components/BlogPost.js → themes/plog/index.js → themes/plog/components/BlogListPage.js (one verified cycle inside a mutually-dependent group of 4 files)
AC2 · Forms & labels· <input> without a programmatic label · ×4
<input> without a programmatic label REDACTED:546— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<input> without a programmatic label REDACTED:549— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<input> without a programmatic label REDACTED:550— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
<input> without a programmatic label REDACTED:552— This control has no associated label. Add a <label for> / wrapping <label> / aria-label / aria-labelledby so assistive tech can name it.
Orphaned knowledge REDACTED:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
Orphaned knowledge REDACTED:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
Orphaned knowledge public/js/mouse-follow.js:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
Orphaned knowledge public/js/aos.js:1— No living knowledge remains for this large file — its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites.
AC2 · Forms & labels· <textarea> without a programmatic label · ×1
<textarea> without a programmatic label .vitepress/theme/components/DocsAssistant.vue:96— This control has only a placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a <label for>, a wrapping <label>, or aria-label.
AC3 · Page structure· <iframe> without a title · ×1
<iframe> without a title public/games-external/common/index.htm:34— An iframe with no title (or an empty one) is announced only as "frame". Add a non-empty title describing its content, or an aria-label.
Unlisted import '@fisch0920/medium-zoom' __tests__/components/NotionPageZoom.test.js:2— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
Unlisted import 'jsdom' scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:5— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
Unlisted import 'lodash' components/NotionPage.js:146— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
Unlisted import 'lodash.throttle' themes/claude/components/BlogListScroll.js:3— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
Unlisted import 'prop-types' components/FacebookMessenger.js:2— Imported but not declared in any reachable package.json — installs work only by hoisting accident.
S1 · Web-Security Posture· Cryptographic key material is a compile-time constant · ×1
Cryptographic key material is a compile-time constant tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:15— `OPS_COOKIE_SALT` is the key-derivation salt and is a compile-time constant, so the secret this operation depends on is published with the source. A key that ships with the source is not secret: every contributor, fork, mirror and released binary carries it, so anyone holding the repository can decrypt what any installation encrypted, and there is no way to invalidate what was already protected because every deployment built from this source shares the value. Where the constant is a password salt the consequence differs but is no smaller — one global salt means precomputation amortises across every installation, which is the property salting exists to destroy. Read the value from configuration, an environment variable or a secrets manager at startup and FAIL FAST when it is absent, so a missing key stops the process instead of silently falling back to a shared default; treat the committed value as disclosed and rotate it rather than only deleting the line. For a salt, generate a fresh random one per password and store it alongside the hash.
FunctionTooLong: ProfileHome.ProfileHome REDACTED:157— FunctionTooLong — ProfileHome runs 654 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 554 over it, 6.54× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas public/js/mouse-follow.js:7— FunctionTooLong — createMouseCanvas runs 593 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 493 over it, 5.93× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin REDACTED:22— FunctionTooLong — ExternalPlugin runs 387 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 287 over it, 3.87× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: index.Style themes/opc/index.js:528— FunctionTooLong — Style runs 387 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 287 over it, 3.87× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGCircleBG.SVGCircleBG themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGCircleBG runs 289 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 189 over it, 2.89× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGCircleBG.SVGCircleBG themes/starter/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGCircleBG runs 289 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 189 over it, 2.89× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:39— FunctionTooLong — AlgoliaSearchModal runs 286 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 186 over it, 2.86× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: EndspacePlayer.EndspacePlayer themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:220— FunctionTooLong — EndspacePlayer runs 284 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 184 over it, 2.84× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: LoadingCover.LoadingCover themes/endspace/components/LoadingCover.js:12— FunctionTooLong — LoadingCover runs 267 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 167 over it, 2.67× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: NotionComments.NotionComments components/NotionComments.js:21— FunctionTooLong — NotionComments runs 260 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 160 over it, 2.60× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGFooterCircleBG.SVGFooterCircleBG themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGFooterCircleBG runs 254 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 154 over it, 2.54× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGFooterCircleBG.SVGFooterCircleBG themes/starter/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGFooterCircleBG runs 254 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 154 over it, 2.54× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: flutteringRibbon.createFlutteringRibbon public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:15— FunctionTooLong — createFlutteringRibbon runs 252 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 152 over it, 2.52× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SideNav.SideNav themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js:77— FunctionTooLong — SideNav runs 230 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 130 over it, 2.30× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: ShareButtons.ShareButtons REDACTED:69— FunctionTooLong — ShareButtons runs 222 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 122 over it, 2.22× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: DocsChat.DocsChat components/DocsChat.js:10— FunctionTooLong — DocsChat runs 220 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 120 over it, 2.20× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGAvatarBG.SVGAvatarBG themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGAvatarBG runs 219 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 119 over it, 2.19× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SVGAvatarBG.SVGAvatarBG themes/starter/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1— FunctionTooLong — SVGAvatarBG runs 219 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 119 over it, 2.19× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SEO.SEO REDACTED:15— FunctionTooLong — SEO runs 215 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 115 over it, 2.15× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: Footer.Footer themes/commerce/components/Footer.js:16— FunctionTooLong — Footer runs 194 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 94 over it, 1.94× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: CustomContextMenu.CustomContextMenu components/CustomContextMenu.js:14— FunctionTooLong — CustomContextMenu runs 190 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 90 over it, 1.90× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: MobileNav.MobileNav themes/endspace/components/MobileNav.js:77— FunctionTooLong — MobileNav runs 188 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 88 over it, 1.88× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SocialButton.SocialButton themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:11— FunctionTooLong — SocialButton runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SocialButton.SocialButton themes/gitbook/components/SocialButton.js:11— FunctionTooLong — SocialButton runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FunctionTooLong: SocialButton.SocialButton themes/magzine/components/SocialButton.js:11— FunctionTooLong — SocialButton runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
+ 75 more in this group — see findings.md.
R4 · Test Coverage· No test reaches this file · ×40
No test reaches this file tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file components/ThemeSwitch.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file public/js/mouse-follow.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file public/js/aos.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file REDACTED:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file REDACTED:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file scripts/generate-theme-user-docs.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file components/FacebookMessenger.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file components/CustomContextMenu.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file lib/utils/sitemap.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file components/DocsChat.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file tools/notionnext-content-mcp/smoke-test.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file scripts/translate/pipeline.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file functions/api/ai-chat.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file REDACTED:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file public/js/fireworks.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file functions/api/docs-chat.ts:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file REDACTED:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file scripts/audit-theme-performance.js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
No test reaches this file pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:1— No test imports this module directly or transitively. Import reachability cannot see a test that executes a file by path instead of importing it, nor one that drives it through a running browser by navigating to a URL — if neither does, no test reaches this one.
+ 15 more in this group — see findings.md.
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped· Untrusted text written into markup unescaped · ×39
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:311— ``
window.chatbaseConfig = {
chatbotId: "${CHATBASE_ID}",
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:326— ``
(function(c, l, a, r, i, t, y) {
c[a] = c[a] || function() {
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:377— ``
daovoice('init', {
app_id: "${COMMENT_DAO_VOICE_ID}"
});
d…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:427— ``
((window.gitter = {}).chat = {}).options = {
room: '${COMMENT_GITTER_ROOM}'
}…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:442— ``
var _hmt = _hmt || [];
(function() {
var hm = document.createElement("script");
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:460— ``
document.write(unescape("%3Cspan style='display:none' id='cnzz_stat_icon_${ANALYTICS_CNZZ_ID}'%3E%3C/span…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:482— ``
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:500— ``
var _paq = window._paq = window._paq || [];
_paq.push(['trackPageView']);
…` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:204— `pageId` is text this program did not author, and it is written into a quoted attribute value through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:205— `refAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:206— `minimizedAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:207— `themeColorAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:208— `loggedInGreetingAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:209— `loggedOutGreetingAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:210— `greetingDialogDisplayAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/FacebookMessenger.js:211— `greetingDialogDelayAttribute` is text this program did not author, and it is written into an unquoted attribute through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. HTML text encoding does not help in an unquoted attribute — whitespace ends it; quote the attribute and encode the value.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/KatexReact.js:53— `state.innerHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped components/PrismMac.js:386— `codeHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:264— `JSON.stringify(generateStructuredData(meta,siteInfo,url,image,AUTHOR,LINK))` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:226— `v` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped pages/_document.js:106— `darkModeScript` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped REDACTED:118— `newHtml` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js:21— `locale.COMMON.PASSWORD_ERROR` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `innerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped themes/claude/components/ExampleRecentComments.js:28— `comment.comment` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Untrusted text written into markup unescaped themes/claude/components/TopBar.js:14— `content` is text this program did not author, and it is written into the text of an element through `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` with nothing encoding it for that place. Whoever controls the value controls the markup: it can close the element or attribute it sits in and open a script of its own. Encode it for HTML at this site, render it through the framework's escaping output, or sanitise it if it must stay markup.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) themes/xuhome/components/AudioPlayer.js:24— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) themes/matery/components/Hero.js:42— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) themes/hexo/components/Hero.js:48— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) themes/claude/components/DarkModeButton.js:35— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:148— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) public/js/cusdis.es.js:32— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/utils/robots.txt.js:21— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/utils/rss.js:164— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/algolia.js:72— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/algolia.js:103— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:116— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:150— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:190— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/plugins/wordCount.js:25— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/db/notion/getAllPageIds.js:85— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/db/notion/getNotionAPI.js:77— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/cache/build_session.js:68— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/cache/file_lock.js:43— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) lib/cache/local_file_cache.js:44— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:122— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:125— An empty catch block silently discards the error — failures vanish with no log and no rethrow. Log it, handle it, or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) components/Comment.js:71— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) components/Giscus.js:30— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) components/PWAInstaller.js:21— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Swallowed exception (empty catch) components/PWAInstaller.js:30— `.catch(() => {})` handles the rejection by doing nothing — the failure is discarded with no log and no rethrow, and the chain carries on as if the work succeeded. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, hand it to a caller that can (`next(error)`, a returned rejection), or don't catch it.
Repeated repair: themes/proxio/index.js themes/proxio/index.js:97— themes/proxio/index.js changed 5 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 13 (its worst body is index.LayoutIndex at line 97), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(proxio): hide post catalog on locked articles”; “fix(proxio): narrow the article column only on xl screens”; “fix(proxio): keep catalog sidebar beside the article and sticky”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/proxio/index.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/fuwari/components/ArticleLock.js themes/fuwari/components/ArticleLock.js:4— themes/fuwari/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 12 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 4), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix: 清理图片放大状态并修复 Fuwari 密码重试”; “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/fuwari/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: pages/[prefix]/index.js pages/[prefix]/index.js:24— pages/[prefix]/index.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 6 (its worst body is index.Slug at line 24), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(access): support static locks and preserve safe public fallbacks”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- pages/[prefix]/index.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/claude/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/commerce/components/ArticleLock.js themes/commerce/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/commerce/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/commerce/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/example/components/PostLock.js themes/example/components/PostLock.js:11— themes/example/components/PostLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is PostLock.PostLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/example/components/PostLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/game/components/ArticleLock.js themes/game/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/game/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/game/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/gitbook/components/ArticleLock.js themes/gitbook/components/ArticleLock.js:12— themes/gitbook/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 12), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/gitbook/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/heo/components/PostLock.js themes/heo/components/PostLock.js:11— themes/heo/components/PostLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is PostLock.PostLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/heo/components/PostLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/hexo/components/ArticleLock.js themes/hexo/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/hexo/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/hexo/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/magzine/components/ArticleLock.js themes/magzine/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/magzine/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/magzine/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/matery/components/ArticleLock.js themes/matery/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/matery/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix(matery): 修复悬浮按钮与分享按钮图标居中偏移 (#4346)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/matery/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/medium/components/ArticleLock.js themes/medium/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/medium/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/medium/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/movie/components/ArticleLock.js themes/movie/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/movie/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/movie/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/nav/components/ArticleLock.js themes/nav/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/nav/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/nav/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/next/components/ArticleLock.js themes/next/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/next/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/next/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/nobelium/components/ArticleLock.js themes/nobelium/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/nobelium/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/nobelium/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/photo/components/ArticleLock.js themes/photo/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/photo/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/photo/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/plog/components/ArticleLock.js themes/plog/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/plog/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/plog/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/proxio/components/ArticleLock.js themes/proxio/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/proxio/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/proxio/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/simple/components/ArticleLock.js themes/simple/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/simple/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/simple/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/starter/components/ArticleLock.js themes/starter/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/starter/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/starter/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: themes/typography/components/ArticleLock.js themes/typography/components/ArticleLock.js:11— themes/typography/components/ArticleLock.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is ArticleLock.ArticleLock at line 11), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(posts): 修复隐藏发布子页访问与 ISR 失败处理”; “fix(posts): verify passwords on the server across built-in themes”; “fix: 修复加密文章提交按钮文字被遮挡的问题 (#4379)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/typography/components/ArticleLock.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Repeated repair: components/NotionCollection.js components/NotionCollection.js:7— components/NotionCollection.js changed 3 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file's churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 4 (its worst body is NotionCollection.NotionCollection at line 7), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn × complexity hotspot — the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: “fix(notion): keep Gallery at full width inside the visibility wrapper”; “fix(notion): resolve nested Gallery view settings (#4475)”; “fix(notion): read Gallery view from renderer context (#4370)”. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/NotionCollection.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/db/SiteDataApi.js lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:383— lib/db/SiteDataApi.js changed 7 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 42 in SiteDataApi.resolvePostProps at line 383. 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/db/SiteDataApi.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: REDACTED REDACTED:22— REDACTED changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 66 in ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin at line 22. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- REDACTED`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:39— components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 65 in AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal at line 39. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: REDACTED REDACTED:15— REDACTED changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 39 in SEO.SEO at line 15. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- REDACTED`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: components/NotionPage.js components/NotionPage.js:19— components/NotionPage.js changed 6 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 25 in NotionPage.NotionPage at line 19. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/NotionPage.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: components/ThemeSwitch.js components/ThemeSwitch.js:89— components/ThemeSwitch.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 67 in ThemeSwitch.ThemeConsole at line 89. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/ThemeSwitch.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: REDACTED REDACTED:69— REDACTED changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 63 in ShareButtons.ShareButtons at line 69. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- REDACTED`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: pages/api/revalidate.js pages/api/revalidate.js:16— pages/api/revalidate.js changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 36 in revalidate.handler at line 16. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- pages/api/revalidate.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/db/notion/mapImage.js lib/db/notion/mapImage.js:14— lib/db/notion/mapImage.js changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 26 in mapImage.mapImgUrl at line 14. 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/db/notion/mapImage.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/config.js lib/config.js:17— lib/config.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 47 in config.siteConfig at line 17. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 1 changed it for other reasons — this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one — a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/config.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js:17— themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 31 in Catalog.Catalog at line 17. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js:118— lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in getNotionPost.fetchPageFromNotion at line 118. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: components/PrismMac.js components/PrismMac.js:25— components/PrismMac.js changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 27 in PrismMac.PrismMac at line 25. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/PrismMac.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: themes/proxio/components/MobileCatalog.js themes/proxio/components/MobileCatalog.js:12— themes/proxio/components/MobileCatalog.js changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in MobileCatalog.MobileCatalog at line 12. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/proxio/components/MobileCatalog.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: REDACTED REDACTED:356— REDACTED changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 23 in getPostBlocks.formatNotionBlock at line 356. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- REDACTED`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: components/Comment.js components/Comment.js:17— components/Comment.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 30 in Comment.Comment at line 17. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- components/Comment.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js:9— lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 19 in convertInnerUrl.convertInnerUrl at line 9. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/server/postAccess.js lib/server/postAccess.js:33— lib/server/postAccess.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 26 in postAccess.resolveUuidPostAccess at line 33. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/server/postAccess.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:180— lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 20 in getPageProperties.adjustPageProperties at line 180. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: themes/matery/components/SocialButton.js themes/matery/components/SocialButton.js:18— themes/matery/components/SocialButton.js changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in SocialButton.SocialButton at line 18. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-28..2026-10-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-07-28 15:12:05 +08:00' --until='2026-10-26 15:12:05 +08:00' --full-history --no-merges -- themes/matery/components/SocialButton.js`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Async function without AbortSignal · ×13
Async function without AbortSignal: notionRequest tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1005— `notionRequest` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: refreshSiteCache tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1559— `refreshSiteCache` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchPage scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:240— `fetchPage` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: download scripts/localize-legacy-images.mjs:42— `download` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchArticle scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:107— `fetchArticle` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: downloadImages scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs:130— `downloadImages` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: getAiSummary lib/plugins/aiSummary.js:8— `getAiSummary` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: subscribeToNewsletter lib/plugins/mailchimp.js:47— `subscribeToNewsletter` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: postNotion lib/db/notion/CustomNotionApi.ts:17— `postNotion` awaits `axios.post(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `axios.post(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchHtmlArtifactContent REDACTED:327— `fetchHtmlArtifactContent` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchMembersFromOfficialAPI lib/db/notion/memberDataSource.js:117— `fetchMembersFromOfficialAPI` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchCounts components/WebMention.js:24— `fetchCounts` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Async function without AbortSignal: fetchMentions components/WebMention.js:80— `fetchMentions` awaits `fetch(…)` but neither accepts an AbortSignal nor passes one on, so its caller cannot stop the request once it has started. Accept `{ signal }` and pass it through: `fetch(url, { signal })`.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/cache/file_lock.js:202— `fs.existsSync` in `waitForUnlock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/cache/invalidation.js:66— `fs.writeFileSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/cache/invalidation.js:67— `fs.renameSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/cache/invalidation.js:69— `fs.rmSync` in `rotateCacheGeneration` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:30— `fs.existsSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:31— `fs.statSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:35— `fs.unlinkSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts:44— `fs.writeFileSync` in `acquireLock` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/utils/rss.js:160— `fs.mkdirSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/utils/rss.js:161— `fs.writeFileSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/utils/rss.js:162— `fs.writeFileSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Sync-over-async blocking lib/utils/rss.js:163— `fs.writeFileSync` in `generateRss` blocks the event loop until it finishes — a blocking call inside async code stalls the event loop — every other request waits for as long as it runs.
Change-coupling hub: [[...index]].js → REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [[...index]].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/sign-up/[[...index]].js— `pages/sign-up/[[...index]].js` changes together with 14 other files — `pages/[prefix]/index.js`, `pages/archive/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js`, `pages/category/index.js`, `pages/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/index.js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/index.js`, `pages/sign-in/[[...index]].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 14 separate couplings, not 14 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 14.
Change-coupling hub: [page].js → REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js— `pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js` changes together with 7 other files — `pages/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/index.js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 7 separate couplings, not 7 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 7.
Change-coupling hub: REDACTED → [page].js, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/category/index.js— `pages/category/index.js` changes together with 5 other files — `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 5 separate couplings, not 5 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 5.
Change-coupling hub: [page].js → REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js— `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js` changes together with 3 other files — `pages/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3.
Change-coupling hub: REDACTED → [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/category/[category]/index.js— `pages/category/[category]/index.js` changes together with 6 other files — `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/index.js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 6 separate couplings, not 6 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 6.
Change-coupling hub: REDACTED → 404.js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, [page].js, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/archive/index.js— `pages/archive/index.js` changes together with 10 other files — `pages/404.js`, `pages/category/[category]/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js`, `pages/category/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 10 separate couplings, not 10 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 10.
Change-coupling hub: REDACTED → 404.js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/search/index.js— `pages/search/index.js` changes together with 9 other files — `pages/404.js`, `pages/category/[category]/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js`, `pages/category/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 9 separate couplings, not 9 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 9.
Change-coupling hub: REDACTED → 404.js, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, [page].js, [page].js, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED pages/[prefix]/index.js— `pages/[prefix]/index.js` changes together with 11 other files — `pages/404.js`, `pages/archive/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/index.js`, `pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js`, `pages/category/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/page/[page].js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 11 separate couplings, not 11 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 11.
Change-coupling hub: [page].js → REDACTED, [[...index]].js, REDACTED, REDACTED pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js— `pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js` changes together with 4 other files — `pages/index.js`, `pages/sign-in/[[...index]].js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 4 separate couplings, not 4 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 4.
Change-coupling hub: [page].js → REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED pages/page/[page].js— `pages/page/[page].js` changes together with 3 other files — `pages/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3.
Change-coupling hub: 404.js → REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED, [page].js, REDACTED, REDACTED, REDACTED pages/404.js— `pages/404.js` changes together with 7 other files — `pages/category/[category]/index.js`, `pages/category/index.js`, `pages/index.js`, `pages/page/[page].js`, `pages/search/[keyword]/index.js`, `pages/tag/[tag]/index.js`, `pages/tag/index.js` — none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 7 separate couplings, not 7 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 7.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Focus outline removed in CSS without a · ×10
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css:111— `.notion *` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css:421— `.notion details > summary` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement styles/notion.css:1033— `.notion-toggle > summary` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-colorblind.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-dimmed.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-high-contrast.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-light-colorblind.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-light.css:419— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
Focus outline removed in CSS without a :focus replacement public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown.css:543— `.markdown-body .anchor:focus` sets the outline to none/0 and no visible :focus / :focus-visible style for that element replaces it in this stylesheet, so a keyboard user cannot see where focus is. Draw a focus ring (outline, box-shadow or border) under :focus-visible.
AC6 · Visual & motion safety· Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard · ×10
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard styles/globals.css:328— `.lazy-image-placeholder` moves (`animation: l1 1s infinite linear`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard styles/notion.css:1690— `.lazy-image-real.medium-zoom-image` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s cubic-bezier(0.2, 0, 0.2, 1),
opacity 400ms ease-out`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css:16— `.code-toolbar` moves (`transition: box-shadow 0.3s ease, transform 0.3s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css:190— `.collapse-chevron` moves (`transition: transform 0.3s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css:203— `.collapse-panel` moves (`transition: max-height 0.32s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/prism-mac-style.css:300— `.code-side-panel-drawer` moves (`transition: opacity 0.22s ease, transform 0.22s ease`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css:66— `.fadeInDown` moves (`animation-name: fadeInDown`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css:99— `.fadeInLeft` moves (`animation-name: fadeInLeft`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css:132— `.fadeInRight` moves (`animation-name: fadeInRight`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard public/css/wow/animate.css:165— `.fadeInUp` moves (`animation-name: fadeInUp`) and nothing reads prefers-reduced-motion for it — no @media (prefers-reduced-motion) rule for this element, no reset this project loads — so a motion-sensitive user cannot turn it off (WCAG 2.3.3). Declare it under @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference), or neutralise it under reduce.
FileTooLong: notionnext-content-mcp/server.js tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js— FileTooLong — 1312 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 812 over it, 2.62× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: REDACTED REDACTED— FileTooLong — 1251 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 751 over it, 2.50× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: opc/index.js themes/opc/index.js— FileTooLong — 993 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 493 over it, 1.99× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: REDACTED REDACTED— FileTooLong — 766 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units), about 85% of them inside a single declaration: ProfileHome (157-968). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 266 over it, 1.53× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: db/SiteDataApi.js lib/db/SiteDataApi.js— FileTooLong — 761 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 261 over it, 1.52× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/ThemeSwitch.js components/ThemeSwitch.js— FileTooLong — 688 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 188 over it, 1.38× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: js/mouse-follow.js public/js/mouse-follow.js— FileTooLong — 594 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 100% of them inside a single declaration: createMouseCanvas (7-713). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 94 over it, 1.19× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js— FileTooLong — 523 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 23 over it, 1.05× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: components/PrismMac.js components/PrismMac.js— FileTooLong — 502 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded; the length bar is tripled for a single-responsibility module of 4 or fewer top-level units). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 2 over it, 1.00× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/commerce/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/gitbook/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/hexo/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/magzine/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 40, 49). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/matery/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/medium/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/nav/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 40, 49). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Progress.Progress (cognitive 16) themes/next/components/Progress.js:9— Progress.Progress has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 19, 39, 48). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/commerce/components/PaginationNumber.js:72— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:173— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/hexo/components/PaginationNumber.js:81— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/matery/components/PaginationNumber.js:72— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:175— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/next/components/PaginationNumber.js:80— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PaginationNumber.generatePages (cognitive 17) themes/photo/components/PaginationNumber.js:175— PaginationNumber.generatePages has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (13 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Change coupling: [...suffix].js ↔ REDACTED pages/[prefix]/[slug]/[...suffix].js:1— `pages/[prefix]/[slug]/[...suffix].js` and `pages/[prefix]/[slug]/index.js` change together 92% of the time (22 of the 24 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 22 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `62a7c580` fix(pages): import isExport for getStaticProps revalidate; `e678bef2` fix: avoid undefined isExport in slug routes; `94219881` fix(build): share static path work across build workers (#4033) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: getAllCategories.js ↔ getAllTags.js lib/db/notion/getAllCategories.js:1— `lib/db/notion/getAllCategories.js` and `lib/db/notion/getAllTags.js` change together 80% of the time (8 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `1614a6ed` 支持让标签按照文章数量倒序排列 (at that commit the files were still `lib/notion/getAllCategories.js` and `lib/notion/getAllTags.js`); `49831089` 完善编译，数据库支持多视图排序 (at that commit the files were still `lib/notion/getAllCategories.js` and `lib/notion/getAllTags.js`); `81e018fe` fix-build (at that commit the files were still `lib/notion/getAllCategories.js` and `lib/notion/getAllTags.js`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ButtonFloatDarkMode.js ↔ ButtonJumpToComment.js themes/hexo/components/ButtonFloatDarkMode.js:1— `themes/hexo/components/ButtonFloatDarkMode.js` and `themes/hexo/components/ButtonJumpToComment.js` change together 70% of the time (7 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `58d86b53` chore(right float area): add tips (#4213); `73a4e26d` hexo 微调，添加随机跳转按钮; `c8c1e714` hexo 回顶 按钮 样式 (at that commit the files were still `themes/hexo/components/FloatDarkModeButton.js` and `themes/hexo/components/JumpToCommentButton.js`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: ButtonFloatDarkMode.js ↔ ButtonJumpToTop.js themes/hexo/components/ButtonFloatDarkMode.js:1— `themes/hexo/components/ButtonFloatDarkMode.js` and `themes/hexo/components/ButtonJumpToTop.js` change together 60% of the time (6 of the 10 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `73a4e26d` hexo 微调，添加随机跳转按钮; `c8c1e714` hexo 回顶 按钮 样式 (at that commit the files were still `themes/hexo/components/FloatDarkModeButton.js` and `themes/hexo/components/JumpToTopButton.js`); `b398b571` hexo 主题微调 (at that commit the files were still `themes/Hexo/components/FloatDarkModeButton.js` and `themes/Hexo/components/JumpToTopButton.js`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: REDACTED ↔ [[...index]].js pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:1— `pages/search/[keyword]/index.js` and `pages/sign-in/[[...index]].js` change together 53% of the time (8 of the 15 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `84236f3c` fix: 修复 eslint 报错; `394c8e0e` 重构；DynamicLayout组件重写，移除blog.config.js中的MAPPING配置; `21d9bc03` 动态组件模式调整 — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: BlogPostCard.js ↔ CategoryBar.js themes/heo/components/BlogPostCard.js:1— `themes/heo/components/BlogPostCard.js` and `themes/heo/components/CategoryBar.js` change together 50% of the time (7 of the 14 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `f7258fd2` heo 主题 一点点细节; `1d818863` dark-mode; `89634479` theme-heo — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: CategoryBar.js ↔ Hero.js themes/heo/components/CategoryBar.js:1— `themes/heo/components/CategoryBar.js` and `themes/heo/components/Hero.js` change together 50% of the time (7 of the 14 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency between them. They sit in the same directory, but in this ecosystem each file is its own module — a sibling reference still needs an import — so the missing import edge is real: the coupling runs through shared behaviour, not a declared dependency. If they duplicate structure, extract the common part into one unit; otherwise the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `f7258fd2` heo 主题 一点点细节; `b98af6a9` heo , seo + google ads; `afcdb254` heo微调优化，全局smooth — run `git show` on any of them.
SocialButton.SocialButton (cyclomatic 19) themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton.SocialButton has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton.SocialButton (cyclomatic 19) themes/gitbook/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton.SocialButton has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton.SocialButton (cyclomatic 19) themes/hexo/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton.SocialButton has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton.SocialButton (cyclomatic 19) themes/magzine/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton.SocialButton has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton (cognitive 18) themes/magzine/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton (cognitive 18) themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton (cognitive 18) themes/gitbook/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SocialButton (cognitive 18) themes/hexo/components/SocialButton.js:11— SocialButton has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
AC3 · Page structure· Page without a main landmark · ×3
Page without a main landmark public/dplayer.htm:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. This document's body is only the mount point <div id="dplayer-container">, so there is no content here to wrap — render the <main> from the component mounted into it.
Page without a main landmark public/games-external/common/index.htm:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Page without a main landmark REDACTED:2— No <main> (or role="main") means no "skip to content" target and a weaker landmark map. Wrap the primary content in <main>.
Boundary violation [package:third-party-deep-import] components/NotionCollection.js:2— components/NotionCollection.js:2 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/collection, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead.
Boundary violation [package:third-party-deep-import] components/NotionPage.js:286— components/NotionPage.js:286 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/code, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead.
Boundary violation [package:third-party-deep-import] components/NotionPage.js:342— components/NotionPage.js:342 imports react-notion-x/build/third-party/modal, reaching past a declared dependency's public entry into its build output — that path is the package's toolchain layout, not its API, and a minor version bump can relocate it with no semver signal. Import from the package's documented entry point instead.
Weak hash algorithm lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:51— MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`createHash("sha256")`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call.
Weak hash algorithm themes/nobelium/components/ArticleInfo.js:13— MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`createHash("sha256")`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call.
Weak hash algorithm themes/plog/components/ArticleInfo.js:13— MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything — a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence — that is a real weakness: use SHA-256+ (`createHash("sha256")`) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead — a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code — since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call.
AC4 · Keyboard semantics· Anchor without href · ×2
Anchor without href REDACTED:317— An <a> with no href, role or tabindex isn't focusable or keyboard-activatable. Give it a real href, or use a <button> for an action.
Anchor without href REDACTED:555— An <a> with no href, role or tabindex isn't focusable or keyboard-activatable. Give it a real href, or use a <button> for an action.
index.LayoutSlug (cyclomatic 25) themes/movie/index.js:152— index.LayoutSlug has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 158, 184, 238, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
index.LayoutSlug (cyclomatic 25) themes/photo/index.js:152— index.LayoutSlug has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 158, 186, 240, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
PaginationNumber.PaginationNumber (cyclomatic 16) themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:14— PaginationNumber.PaginationNumber has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
PaginationNumber.PaginationNumber (cyclomatic 16) themes/photo/components/PaginationNumber.js:14— PaginationNumber.PaginationNumber has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
createMouseCanvas::value::t (cognitive 84) public/js/mouse-follow.js:200— createMouseCanvas::value::t has cognitive complexity 84 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 15 (31 pts), boolean chains 22, loops 10 (21 pts), if/else 10 (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
createMouseCanvas::deepExtend (cognitive 16) public/js/mouse-follow.js:40— createMouseCanvas::deepExtend has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.LayoutSlug (cognitive 34) themes/movie/index.js:152— index.LayoutSlug has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (26 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 34 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 158, 184, 238, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
index.LayoutSlug (cognitive 34) themes/photo/index.js:152— index.LayoutSlug has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (26 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 34 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 158, 186, 240, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Toc.Toc (cognitive 19) themes/fuwari/components/Toc.js:10— Toc.Toc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 3 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 20, 14, 71). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Toc.Toc (cognitive 19) themes/next/components/Toc.js:8— Toc.Toc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function literals inside it that branch (lines 16, 48, 59, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Catalog.Catalog (cognitive 19) themes/gitbook/components/Catalog.js:12— Catalog.Catalog has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 28, 78). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Catalog.Catalog (cognitive 19) themes/nav/components/Catalog.js:12— Catalog.Catalog has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 28, 74). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs· Guard cannot change the result · ×2
Guard cannot change the result — returns what the code already falls through to REDACTED:409— The guard above `return null;` also returns `null`, so no input can make it matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or delete the guard.
Guard cannot change the result — returns what the code already falls through to lib/utils/clean.util.ts:19— The guard above `return items;` also returns `items`, so no input can make it matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or delete the guard.
Fake-async — async method never awaits REDACTED:345— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Fake-async — async method never awaits REDACTED:124— `main` is declared `async` but never awaits anything, so it runs synchronously while pretending to be asynchronous. Drop `async` or do the real async work.
Duplicated block (80 lines × 2 locations) themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:7— themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:7 · themes/nobelium/components/SearchInput.js:7 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
Duplicated block (80 lines × 2 locations) themes/medium/components/SearchInput.js:5— themes/medium/components/SearchInput.js:5 · themes/simple/components/SearchInput.js:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
Duplicated block (63 lines × 2 locations) themes/claude/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5— themes/claude/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5 · themes/typography/components/MenuItemDrop.js:5 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Duplicated block (63 lines × 2 locations) themes/magzine/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:37— themes/magzine/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:37 · themes/medium/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:32 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document· Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap · ×2
Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap lib/utils/index.js:286— `deepClone` is exported and takes `obj: object` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 286 (`deepClone`) with a piece of `obj` (and at line 294) — and nowhere in `deepClone` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. JavaScript sets no limit of its own on that nesting: `JSON.parse` accepts any depth, so a 100,000-byte body — inside Express's default 100kb limit — parses to 50,000 levels, and a walk like this one throws `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` long before it reaches the bottom. Wherever that throw lands, the work fails: a request errors, and a walk running outside any `try` — an event handler, a timer, a promise nobody awaits — takes the Node process down with every other request in flight. Thread a depth argument through `deepClone` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack.
Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap lib/utils/validation.js:302— `deepSanitizeObject` is exported and takes `obj: object` from its caller, and it calls itself at line 302 (`this.deepSanitizeObject`) with a piece of `obj` (and at line 307) — and nowhere in `deepSanitizeObject` is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller's document — not this code — decides how deep the stack goes. JavaScript sets no limit of its own on that nesting: `JSON.parse` accepts any depth, so a 100,000-byte body — inside Express's default 100kb limit — parses to 50,000 levels, and a walk like this one throws `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` long before it reaches the bottom. Wherever that throw lands, the work fails: a request errors, and a walk running outside any `try` — an event handler, a timer, a promise nobody awaits — takes the Node process down with every other request in flight. Thread a depth argument through `deepSanitizeObject` and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack.
Low contrast colour pair in CSS (3.1:1) public/themes/claude/github-markdown-css/github-markdown-dark-high-contrast.css:943— `.markdown-body .pl-mi2` sets color: #f0f6fc on background-color: #318bf8 — 3.1:1, below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum for normal text. Darken or lighten one of them.
AC7 · A11y enforcement· Accessibility enforcement below the top rung · ×1
Accessibility enforcement below the top rung — No accessibility enforcement found — no a11y linter (eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y) and no axe/pa11y/Lighthouse in tests or CI. Start with the linter to catch issues at author time. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 29 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository's test and CI files — matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas (cyclomatic 112) public/js/mouse-follow.js:7— mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas has cyclomatic complexity 112 (threshold 15). Of this number, 43 points are the body's own statements and 69 belong to 16 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ProfileHome.ProfileHome (cyclomatic 104) REDACTED:157— ProfileHome.ProfileHome has cyclomatic complexity 104 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 11 of the 104 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 33 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 230, a function literal at line 312, a function literal at line 178, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
ThemeConsole (cyclomatic 70) components/ThemeSwitch.js:89— ThemeConsole has cyclomatic complexity 70 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 15 of the 70 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 52 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 269, a function literal at line 396, hexToHue, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
_go2 (cyclomatic 67) REDACTED:1402— _go2 has cyclomatic complexity 67 (threshold 15). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin (cyclomatic 66) REDACTED:22— ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin has cyclomatic complexity 66 (threshold 15). Of this number, 51 points are the body's own statements and 15 belong to 8 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal (cyclomatic 65) components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:39— AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 14 of the 65 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 17 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 176, handleSearch, openSearch, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
flutteringRibbon.createFlutteringRibbon (cyclomatic 64) public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:15— flutteringRibbon.createFlutteringRibbon has cyclomatic complexity 64 (threshold 15). Of this number, 32 points are the body's own statements and 32 belong to 7 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
(anonymous) (cyclomatic 61) public/js/aos.js:143— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 61 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 61 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 20 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 144, (anonymous)::u, (anonymous)::n, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
createMouseCanvas::value::t (cyclomatic 59) public/js/mouse-follow.js:200— createMouseCanvas::value::t has cyclomatic complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
(anonymous) (cyclomatic 57) public/js/aos.js:296— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 57 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 19 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 297, (anonymous)::a, (anonymous)::n, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
EndspacePlayer.EndspacePlayer (cyclomatic 52) themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:220— EndspacePlayer.EndspacePlayer has cyclomatic complexity 52 (threshold 15). Of this number, 33 points are the body's own statements and 19 belong to 7 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Catalog.Catalog (cyclomatic 49) themes/claude/components/Catalog.js:18— Catalog.Catalog has cyclomatic complexity 49 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 49 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 131, a function literal at line 216, a function literal at line 109, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
config.siteConfig (cyclomatic 47) lib/config.js:17— config.siteConfig has cyclomatic complexity 47 (threshold 15). Of this number, 45 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
SideNav.SideNav (cyclomatic 46) themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js:77— SideNav.SideNav has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 30 belong to 8 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
readNotionPropertyValue (cyclomatic 46) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1032— readNotionPropertyValue has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). Of this number, 41 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 6 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
pipeline.translateOnePage (cyclomatic 44) scripts/translate/pipeline.js:33— pipeline.translateOnePage has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15). Of this number, 39 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SiteDataApi.resolvePostProps (cyclomatic 42) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:383— SiteDataApi.resolvePostProps has cyclomatic complexity 42 (threshold 15). Of this number, 29 points are the body's own statements and 13 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
useProtectedPost (cyclomatic 40) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:4— useProtectedPost has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 40 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 18, (anonymous)::unlockSavedPassword, a function literal at line 90, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SEO.SEO (cyclomatic 39) REDACTED:15— SEO.SEO has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). Of this number, 37 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
TechGrow.TechGrow (cyclomatic 39) components/TechGrow.js:182— TechGrow.TechGrow has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 39 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (loadReadmore, a function literal at line 396, loadReadmore::fixReadmoreWrapperPosition, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
LazyImage.LazyImage (cyclomatic 38) components/LazyImage.js:23— LazyImage.LazyImage has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). Of this number, 23 points are the body's own statements and 15 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
output (cyclomatic 38) REDACTED:831— output has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
revalidate.handler (cyclomatic 36) pages/api/revalidate.js:16— revalidate.handler has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
NotionComments.NotionComments (cyclomatic 35) components/NotionComments.js:21— NotionComments.NotionComments has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 35 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (renderComment, submitComment, a function literal at line 37, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
convertNotionToSiteData (cyclomatic 35) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:519— convertNotionToSiteData has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 9 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
revalidation.collectRevalidationPaths (cyclomatic 34) lib/server/revalidation.js:35— revalidation.collectRevalidationPaths has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). Of this number, 29 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
import-legacy-docs.renderBlock (cyclomatic 33) scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:175— import-legacy-docs.renderBlock has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
getNotionConfig.parseConfigFromPage (cyclomatic 32) lib/db/notion/getNotionConfig.js:87— getNotionConfig.parseConfigFromPage has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Catalog.Catalog (cyclomatic 31) themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js:17— Catalog.Catalog has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 31 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 61, a function literal at line 48, a function literal at line 42, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Comment (cyclomatic 31) components/Comment.js:17— Comment has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). Of this number, 19 points are the body's own statements and 12 belong to 8 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
NavBar.NavBar (cyclomatic 29) themes/claude/components/NavBar.js:54— NavBar.NavBar has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). Of this number, 18 points are the body's own statements and 11 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
FloatingControls.FloatingControls (cyclomatic 29) themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js:13— FloatingControls.FloatingControls has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 14 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 39, ControlBtn, toggleDrawer, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
PrismMac (cyclomatic 29) components/PrismMac.js:25— PrismMac has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 29 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 23 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::renderCodeEnhancements, (anonymous)::initCodeEnhancements, (anonymous)::containsUnenhancedCodeBlock, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
MobileNav.MobileNav (cyclomatic 28) themes/fuwari/components/MobileNav.js:7— MobileNav.MobileNav has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 13 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function literals inside it that branch (lines 43, 15, 63, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
MenuItemDrop.MenuItemDrop (cyclomatic 28) themes/thoughtlite/components/MenuItemDrop.js:11— MenuItemDrop.MenuItemDrop has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Of this number, 21 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
(anonymous) (cyclomatic 28) public/js/aos.js:19— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (_, S, j, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
security.validateObject (cyclomatic 27) lib/middleware/security.js:124— security.validateObject has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
giscus.render (cyclomatic 27) REDACTED:24— giscus.render has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Of this number, 26 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
MenuList.MenuList (cyclomatic 27) themes/fuwari/components/MenuList.js:5— MenuList.MenuList has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 37, a function literal at line 23, a function literal at line 60, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
server.buildPropertyBySchema (cyclomatic 27) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:770— server.buildPropertyBySchema has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
getAllMembers (cyclomatic 27) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:1077— getAllMembers has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 27 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1081, 1102). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
getPageProperties (cyclomatic 27) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:25— getPageProperties has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Of this number, 24 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
mapOfficialMemberPage (cyclomatic 27) lib/db/notion/memberDataSource.js:72— mapOfficialMemberPage has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
MenuList (cyclomatic 27) themes/claude/components/MenuList.js:20— MenuList has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (renderGroup, renderMenuIcon, a function literal at line 141, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Draggable.Draggable (cyclomatic 26) components/Draggable.js:9— Draggable.Draggable has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function literals inside it that branch (lines 36, 110, 17, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
PrismMac.openCodeSidePanel (cyclomatic 26) components/PrismMac.js:292— PrismMac.openCodeSidePanel has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 12 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (keydownHandler, copyCode, a function literal at line 362, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
mapImage.mapImgUrl (cyclomatic 26) lib/db/notion/mapImage.js:14— mapImage.mapImgUrl has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Of this number, 24 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
postAccess.resolveUuidPostAccess (cyclomatic 26) lib/server/postAccess.js:33— postAccess.resolveUuidPostAccess has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Of this number, 21 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Header.Header (cyclomatic 26) themes/hexo/components/Header.js:25— Header.Header has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 56). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
NotionPage.NotionPage (cyclomatic 25) components/NotionPage.js:19— NotionPage.NotionPage has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function literals inside it that branch (lines 73, 37, 62, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
publicPost.redactProtectedBlocks (cyclomatic 25) lib/utils/publicPost.js:41— publicPost.redactProtectedBlocks has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Of this number, 24 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
nest.createNest (cyclomatic 25) public/js/nest.js:9— nest.createNest has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 29, o, t, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Header.Header (cyclomatic 25) themes/matery/components/Header.js:24— Header.Header has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 25 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 35, navDarkMode). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SEO.getSEOMeta (cyclomatic 24) REDACTED:399— SEO.getSEOMeta has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
SmartLink.SmartLink (cyclomatic 24) components/SmartLink.js:34— SmartLink.SmartLink has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 24 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (mergePreservedQueryForStringHref, getPersistedQuery, mergePreservedQueryForObjectHref, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
ArticleCopyright.ArticleCopyright (cyclomatic 24) themes/fuwari/components/ArticleCopyright.js:13— ArticleCopyright.ArticleCopyright has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 11 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
adjustPageProperties (cyclomatic 24) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:180— adjustPageProperties has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
useProtectedPost.useProtectedPost.validPassword (cyclomatic 23) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:18— useProtectedPost.useProtectedPost.validPassword has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
env-validation.validateEnvVar (cyclomatic 23) lib/config/env-validation.js:211— env-validation.validateEnvVar has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
getPostBlocks.formatNotionBlock (cyclomatic 23) REDACTED:356— getPostBlocks.formatNotionBlock has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ContactCard.ContactCard (cyclomatic 23) themes/fuwari/components/ContactCard.js:5— ContactCard.ContactCard has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
SidePanel.SidePanel (cyclomatic 23) themes/fuwari/components/SidePanel.js:14— SidePanel.SidePanel has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
- after o/d (cyclomatic 23) REDACTED:783— - after o/d has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
TechGrow.installReadmoreNetworkProbe (cyclomatic 22) components/TechGrow.js:50— TechGrow.installReadmoreNetworkProbe has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
getNotionPost.fetchPageFromNotion (cyclomatic 22) lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js:118— getNotionPost.fetchPageFromNotion has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
pwa.getPwaConfig (cyclomatic 22) lib/pwa.js:9— pwa.getPwaConfig has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
MobileNav.MobileNav (cyclomatic 22) themes/endspace/components/MobileNav.js:77— MobileNav.MobileNav has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 205, renderIcon, renderSocialIcon, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
ThemeSwitch (cyclomatic 22) components/ThemeSwitch.js:570— ThemeSwitch has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 16 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
CustomContextMenu (cyclomatic 22) components/CustomContextMenu.js:14— CustomContextMenu has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 17 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
readPropertyValue (cyclomatic 22) lib/db/notion/memberDataSource.js:22— readPropertyValue has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
renderStarrySky (cyclomatic 22) public/js/starrySky.js:6— renderStarrySky has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (y::fadeOut, y::reset, y::draw, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
NotionEmbed.NotionEmbed (cyclomatic 21) REDACTED:134— NotionEmbed.NotionEmbed has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
getPageTableOfContents.getBlockHeader (cyclomatic 21) lib/db/notion/getPageTableOfContents.js:84— getPageTableOfContents.getBlockHeader has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
LoadingCover.LoadingCover (cyclomatic 21) themes/endspace/components/LoadingCover.js:12— LoadingCover.LoadingCover has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function literals inside it that branch (lines 46, 84, 115, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Catalog.Catalog (cyclomatic 21) themes/typography/components/Catalog.js:12— Catalog.Catalog has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 28, 20, 105). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
(anonymous) (cyclomatic 21) themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js:221— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
NotionTabs.NotionTabs (cyclomatic 20) components/NotionTabs.js:44— NotionTabs.NotionTabs has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 9 function items inside it that branch (handleKeyDown, focusTab, a function literal at line 66, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
notion-comments.handler (cyclomatic 20) REDACTED:99— notion-comments.handler has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
diagnose.runDiagnose (cyclomatic 20) scripts/translate/diagnose.js:3— diagnose.runDiagnose has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 19 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
PostList.PostCard (cyclomatic 20) themes/fuwari/components/PostList.js:32— PostList.PostCard has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 17 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
findObserveGroups (cyclomatic 20) REDACTED:378— findObserveGroups has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 10 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
Accessibility.Accessibility (cyclomatic 19) components/Accessibility.js:8— Accessibility.Accessibility has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 144, addSkipLinks, a function literal at line 13, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
filterCollectionViewData.comparePropertyValues (cyclomatic 19) lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js:264— filterCollectionViewData.comparePropertyValues has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: filterCollectionViewData.matchesFilter (cyclomatic 34) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
getPostBlocks.sanitizeBlockUrls (cyclomatic 19) REDACTED:612— getPostBlocks.sanitizeBlockUrls has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function item inside it that branches (fixUrl). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
convertInnerUrl.convertInnerUrl (cyclomatic 19) lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js:9— convertInnerUrl.convertInnerUrl has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
FloatingToc.FloatingToc (cyclomatic 19) themes/endspace/components/FloatingToc.js:11— FloatingToc.FloatingToc has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 41, updateProgress, a function literal at line 141). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SearchInput.SearchInput (cyclomatic 19) themes/endspace/components/SearchInput.js:10— SearchInput.SearchInput has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
AsideLeft.AsideLeft (cyclomatic 19) themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js:26— AsideLeft.AsideLeft has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function literals inside it that branch (lines 74, 56, 96, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
generateCustomizeSlug (cyclomatic 19) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:277— generateCustomizeSlug has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 300). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
PrismMac.renderCollapseCode (cyclomatic 18) components/PrismMac.js:513— PrismMac.renderCollapseCode has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
notionComments.validateCommentPayload (cyclomatic 18) lib/plugins/notionComments.js:30— notionComments.validateCommentPayload has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
index.LayoutSearch (cyclomatic 18) themes/fuwari/index.js:175— index.LayoutSearch has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
index.LayoutBase (cyclomatic 18) themes/next/index.js:52— index.LayoutBase has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function literals inside it that branch (lines 75, 70, 101, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
BlogItem.BlogItem (cyclomatic 18) themes/thoughtlite/components/BlogItem.js:12— BlogItem.BlogItem has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
env-validation.validateEnvironmentVariables (cyclomatic 17) lib/config/env-validation.js:121— env-validation.validateEnvironmentVariables has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
contributionStore.ensureLegacyHrefCleanup (cyclomatic 17) lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:168— contributionStore.ensureLegacyHrefCleanup has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
GameEmbed.GameEmbed (cyclomatic 17) themes/game/components/GameEmbed.js:15— GameEmbed.GameEmbed has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 10 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
BlogPostCard.BlogPostCard (cyclomatic 17) themes/heo/components/BlogPostCard.js:8— BlogPostCard.BlogPostCard has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
Header.Header (cyclomatic 17) themes/heo/components/Header.js:19— Header.Header has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 5 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
index.Pager (cyclomatic 17) themes/opc/index.js:1195— index.Pager has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
server.normalizeDraftInput (cyclomatic 17) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:567— server.normalizeDraftInput has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SectionHead::Pager (cyclomatic 17) themes/opc/index.js:1195— SectionHead::Pager has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
(anonymous) (cyclomatic 17) components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:168— (anonymous) has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (handleKeyDown, focusInput, a function literal at line 187, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
themeSwitch.manifest.getThemeSwitchMeta (cyclomatic 16) conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js:554— themeSwitch.manifest.getThemeSwitchMeta has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
filterCollectionViewData.filterCollectionViewData (cyclomatic 16) lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js:1— filterCollectionViewData.filterCollectionViewData has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 8). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: filterCollectionViewData.matchesFilter (cyclomatic 34) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
SiteDataApi.getSiteInfo (cyclomatic 16) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:920— SiteDataApi.getSiteInfo has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
getPageContentText.getFullTextContent (cyclomatic 16) lib/db/notion/getPageContentText.js:23— getPageContentText.getFullTextContent has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 28). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: getPageContentText.getPageContentText::getBlockContentText (cyclomatic 21) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
SearchInput.SearchInput (cyclomatic 16) themes/gitbook/components/SearchInput.js:11— SearchInput.SearchInput has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (handleKeyUp, handleSearch, updateSearchKey, …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
index.LayoutBase (cyclomatic 16) themes/hexo/index.js:53— index.LayoutBase has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SocialButton.SocialButton (cyclomatic 16) themes/matery/components/SocialButton.js:18— SocialButton.SocialButton has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
Header.Header (cyclomatic 16) themes/movie/components/Header.js:16— Header.Header has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (onKeyUp, a function literal at line 117, a function literal at line 171, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
ArticleDetail.ArticleDetail (cyclomatic 16) themes/next/components/ArticleDetail.js:24— ArticleDetail.ArticleDetail has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
Toc.Toc (cyclomatic 16) themes/next/components/Toc.js:8— Toc.Toc has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function literals inside it that branch (lines 16, 48, 59, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
NavBar.NavBar (cyclomatic 16) themes/xuhome/components/NavBar.js:11— NavBar.NavBar has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
server.queryPagesTool (cyclomatic 16) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1165— server.queryPagesTool has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Of this number, 8 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity· go (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
go (cyclomatic 16) REDACTED:105— go has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: _getBond (cyclomatic 18) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
GlobalContextProvider (cyclomatic 16) lib/global.js:21— GlobalContextProvider has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 56, a function literal at line 74, a function literal at line 104, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
isIterable (cyclomatic 16) pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:103— isIterable has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (filterByMemCache, a function literal at line 131). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Deprecated: eslint package.json:115— eslint 8.57.1, declared in package.json, is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options.". Replace it with the package or version that message names, or record why this one must stay.
ProfileHome.ProfileHome (cognitive 114) REDACTED:157— ProfileHome.ProfileHome has cognitive complexity 114 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 35 (45 pts), boolean chains 42, ternaries 17 (22 pts), loops 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 17). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 114 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 33 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 312, a function literal at line 178, a function literal at line 230, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
collectRevalidationPaths (cognitive 74) lib/server/revalidation.js:35— collectRevalidationPaths has cognitive complexity 74 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (24 pts), loops 9 (21 pts), ternaries 4 (17 pts), boolean chains 11, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 41). Of this number, 66 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ThemeConsole (cognitive 70) components/ThemeSwitch.js:89— ThemeConsole has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 24, if/else 18 (20 pts), ternaries 19 (20 pts), error handling 3, other 3 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 14 of the 70 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 52 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 269, a function literal at line 396, hexToHue, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SectionHead (cognitive 70) themes/opc/index.js:118— SectionHead has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 39, ternaries 28, if/else 2, other 1. Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 70 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 39 function items inside it that branch (Pager, PostCard, OpcDarkModeButton, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas (cognitive 63) public/js/mouse-follow.js:7— mouse-follow.createMouseCanvas has cognitive complexity 63 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 48, if/else 5 (11 pts), loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 42 points are the body's own statements and 21 belong to 16 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal (cognitive 61) components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:39— AlgoliaSearchModal.AlgoliaSearchModal has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 25 (29 pts), boolean chains 23, ternaries 8, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 61 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 17 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 176, handleSearch, openSearch, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
EndspacePlayer (cognitive 61) themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:220— EndspacePlayer has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 17 (27 pts), boolean chains 21, if/else 12 (13 pts) (nesting depth added 11). Of this number, 36 points are the body's own statements and 25 belong to 14 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin (cognitive 59) REDACTED:22— ExternalPlugins.ExternalPlugin has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 44, if/else 9, ternaries 3, loops 2, error handling 1. Of this number, 45 points are the body's own statements and 14 belong to 8 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
(anonymous) (cognitive 57) public/js/aos.js:143— (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 22 (25 pts), boolean chains 21, if/else 9 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 5). None of this is in the body itself: all 57 points belong to 20 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::u, a function literal at line 144, (anonymous)::n, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Catalog.Catalog (cognitive 54) themes/claude/components/Catalog.js:18— Catalog.Catalog has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (34 pts), ternaries 8 (9 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 3 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 54 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 131, a function literal at line 216, a function literal at line 109, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SiteDataApi.resolvePostProps (cognitive 53) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:383— SiteDataApi.resolvePostProps has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (28 pts), boolean chains 20, error handling 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 14). Of this number, 42 points are the body's own statements and 11 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
_go2 (cognitive 53) REDACTED:1402— _go2 has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (47 pts), boolean chains 5, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 26). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
(anonymous) (cognitive 53) public/js/aos.js:296— (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 20 (23 pts), boolean chains 20, if/else 8 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 5). None of this is in the body itself: all 53 points belong to 19 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::a, a function literal at line 297, (anonymous)::n, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
pipeline.translateOnePage (cognitive 49) scripts/translate/pipeline.js:33— pipeline.translateOnePage has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (21 pts), boolean chains 19, ternaries 6 (7 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 44 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
createTransitions (cognitive 45) REDACTED:520— createTransitions has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (27 pts), if/else 5 (17 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 30). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
parseConfigFromPage (cognitive 45) lib/db/notion/getNotionConfig.js:87— parseConfigFromPage has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (21 pts), boolean chains 15, match/switch 1 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), error handling 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
security.validateObject (cognitive 43) lib/middleware/security.js:124— security.validateObject has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (31 pts), boolean chains 11, loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
useProtectedPost (cognitive 43) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:4— useProtectedPost has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 15, if/else 12 (14 pts), ternaries 5 (10 pts), error handling 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 43 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 18, (anonymous)::unlockSavedPassword, a function literal at line 90, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
output (cognitive 42) REDACTED:831— output has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (28 pts), boolean chains 10, ternaries 1 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 13). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
getPostBlocks.formatNotionBlock (cognitive 41) REDACTED:356— getPostBlocks.formatNotionBlock has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (34 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 21). Of this number, 37 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
go (cognitive 41) REDACTED:105— go has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (32 pts), loops 3 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 23). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
LazyImage.LazyImage (cognitive 40) components/LazyImage.js:23— LazyImage.LazyImage has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (21 pts), boolean chains 14, ternaries 5 (nesting depth added 2). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 18 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
SideNav.SideNav (cognitive 40) themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js:77— SideNav.SideNav has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 20, boolean chains 12, if/else 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 14 of the 40 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 8 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 221, updateIndicatorPosition, renderIcon, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
getPageTableOfContents.getBlockHeader (cognitive 39) lib/db/notion/getPageTableOfContents.js:84— getPageTableOfContents.getBlockHeader has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (32 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
publicPost.redactProtectedBlocks (cognitive 38) lib/utils/publicPost.js:41— publicPost.redactProtectedBlocks has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (20 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 5 (9 pts) (nesting depth added 16). Of this number, 37 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
revalidate.handler (cognitive 38) pages/api/revalidate.js:16— revalidate.handler has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 11 (16 pts), boolean chains 12, if/else 9, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
SEO.SEO (cognitive 37) REDACTED:15— SEO.SEO has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 26, ternaries 7, if/else 4. Of this number, 35 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
GameListIndexCombine.GameListIndexCombine (cognitive 36) themes/game/components/GameListIndexCombine.js:14— GameListIndexCombine.GameListIndexCombine has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (19 pts), loops 5 (15 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
convertNotionToSiteData (cognitive 36) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:519— convertNotionToSiteData has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 15, other 3, loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 4). Of this number, 26 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 9 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
Catalog (cognitive 35) themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js:17— Catalog has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (19 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 6 (7 pts), loops 2 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 35 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 61, (anonymous)::getVisibleHeadings, a function literal at line 157, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
getPageProperties (cognitive 34) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:25— getPageProperties has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (15 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 2 (5 pts), other 4, match/switch 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 14). Of this number, 30 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
mapImage.mapImgUrl (cognitive 33) lib/db/notion/mapImage.js:14— mapImage.mapImgUrl has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (23 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). Of this number, 28 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
postAccess.resolveUuidPostAccess (cognitive 32) lib/server/postAccess.js:33— postAccess.resolveUuidPostAccess has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (16 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 3 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). Of this number, 27 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MenuItemDrop.MenuItemDrop (cognitive 32) themes/thoughtlite/components/MenuItemDrop.js:11— MenuItemDrop.MenuItemDrop has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 11 (20 pts), boolean chains 9, if/else 3 (nesting depth added 9). Of this number, 26 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NotionComments.NotionComments (cognitive 31) components/NotionComments.js:21— NotionComments.NotionComments has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 14, ternaries 8 (10 pts), if/else 5, error handling 2 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 11 of the 31 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (renderComment, submitComment, a function literal at line 37, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
flutteringRibbon.createFlutteringRibbon (cognitive 31) public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:15— flutteringRibbon.createFlutteringRibbon has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 31. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
adjustPageProperties (cognitive 31) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:180— adjustPageProperties has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (21 pts), other 3, ternaries 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Comment (cognitive 31) components/Comment.js:17— Comment has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 19, if/else 10, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 18 points are the body's own statements and 13 belong to 8 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
FloatingControls.FloatingControls (cognitive 30) themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js:13— FloatingControls.FloatingControls has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 9, if/else 5 (8 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 30 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 39, ControlBtn, toggleDrawer, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
MenuList.MenuList (cognitive 30) themes/fuwari/components/MenuList.js:5— MenuList.MenuList has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 15, ternaries 7 (11 pts), if/else 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 30 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 37, a function literal at line 23, a function literal at line 60, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
findObserveGroups (cognitive 29) REDACTED:378— findObserveGroups has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (22 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 12 of the 29 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (_findObserveGroups, _match). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
PrismMac (cognitive 29) components/PrismMac.js:25— PrismMac has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14, boolean chains 7, error handling 5 (6 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 1). None of this is in the body itself: all 29 points belong to 23 function items inside it that branch ((anonymous)::renderCodeEnhancements, (anonymous)::initCodeEnhancements, (anonymous)::containsUnenhancedCodeBlock, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
env-validation.validateEnvVar (cognitive 28) lib/config/env-validation.js:211— env-validation.validateEnvVar has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (19 pts), boolean chains 7, match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
convertInnerUrl.convertInnerUrl (cognitive 28) lib/db/notion/convertInnerUrl.js:9— convertInnerUrl.convertInnerUrl has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (19 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (3 pts), loops 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
(anonymous) (cognitive 28) public/js/aos.js:19— (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 20, ternaries 4, loops 2 (3 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 28 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 11 function items inside it that branch (_, S, a function literal at line 26, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
renderCollapseCode (cognitive 28) components/PrismMac.js:513— renderCollapseCode has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), ternaries 5 (10 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 11). Of this number, 24 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
installReadmoreNetworkProbe (cognitive 28) components/TechGrow.js:50— installReadmoreNetworkProbe has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 9, error handling 2 (4 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (fetch, open, send, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
MobileNav (cognitive 28) themes/fuwari/components/MobileNav.js:7— MobileNav has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 10 (12 pts), boolean chains 11, if/else 5 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 28 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 15 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 43, (anonymous)::onClickOutside, a function literal at line 68, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Draggable.Draggable (cognitive 27) components/Draggable.js:9— Draggable.Draggable has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 17 (19 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 27 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 6 function literals inside it that branch (lines 36, 110, 17, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
NotionPage.NotionPage (cognitive 27) components/NotionPage.js:19— NotionPage.NotionPage has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (21 pts), boolean chains 6 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 11 function literals inside it that branch (lines 73, 37, 62, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
env-validation.validateEnvironmentVariables (cognitive 27) lib/config/env-validation.js:121— env-validation.validateEnvironmentVariables has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (17 pts), loops 7 (9 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
[page].filterByMemCache (cognitive 27) pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:112— [page].filterByMemCache has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Header.Header (cognitive 27) themes/hexo/components/Header.js:25— Header.Header has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 20, if/else 6, ternaries 1. Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 27 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 56). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
buildPropertyBySchema (cognitive 27) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:770— buildPropertyBySchema has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 2 (4 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
getAllMembers (cognitive 27) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:1077— getAllMembers has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, ternaries 2 (4 pts), if/else 3, other 3 (nesting depth added 2). None of this is in the body itself: all 27 points belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 1081, 1102). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
siteConfig (cognitive 27) lib/config.js:17— siteConfig has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (14 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 2 (4 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 7). Of this number, 25 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
isIterable::filterByMemCache (cognitive 27) pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:112— isIterable::filterByMemCache has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (16 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
useProtectedPost.useProtectedPost.validPassword (cognitive 26) hooks/useProtectedPost.js:18— useProtectedPost.useProtectedPost.validPassword has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (9 pts), ternaries 3 (9 pts), boolean chains 7, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ContactCard.ContactCard (cognitive 26) themes/fuwari/components/ContactCard.js:5— ContactCard.ContactCard has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, ternaries 6 (9 pts), if/else 6 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 4). Of this number, 17 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Header.Header (cognitive 26) themes/matery/components/Header.js:24— Header.Header has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 17, if/else 7 (8 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 35, navDarkMode). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
server.readNotionPropertyValue (cognitive 26) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1032— server.readNotionPropertyValue has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 22, ternaries 1 (2 pts), if/else 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 20 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 4 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
openCodeSidePanel (cognitive 26) components/PrismMac.js:292— openCodeSidePanel has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, boolean chains 8, ternaries 4, error handling 1. Most of this is not in the body itself: 12 of the 26 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (keydownHandler, copyCode, a function literal at line 362, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
mapOfficialMemberPage (cognitive 26) lib/db/notion/memberDataSource.js:72— mapOfficialMemberPage has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 16, ternaries 8, if/else 1, other 1. Of this number, 24 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
MenuList (cognitive 26) themes/claude/components/MenuList.js:20— MenuList has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 10, boolean chains 6, if/else 6, other 4. Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 26 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (renderGroup, renderMenuIcon, a function literal at line 141, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
index.filterByMemCache (cognitive 24) pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:71— index.filterByMemCache has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (14 pts), ternaries 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
diagnose.runDiagnose (cognitive 24) scripts/translate/diagnose.js:3— diagnose.runDiagnose has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 8, if/else 6 (8 pts), ternaries 2 (5 pts), loops 2, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 23 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.main (cognitive 24) scripts/translate/index.js:56— index.main has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
server.markdownToBlocks (cognitive 24) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:896— server.markdownToBlocks has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (19 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (nesting depth added 9). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
createFlutteringRibbon::(anonymous)::_drawRibbonSection (cognitive 24) public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:208— createFlutteringRibbon::(anonymous)::_drawRibbonSection has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 3 (12 pts), if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth — most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language's equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function.
AsideLeft (cognitive 24) themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js:26— AsideLeft has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 3 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 24 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 74, a function literal at line 100, a function literal at line 56, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SmartLink.SmartLink (cognitive 23) components/SmartLink.js:34— SmartLink.SmartLink has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 7, ternaries 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (getPersistedQuery, mergePreservedQueryForStringHref, mergePreservedQueryForObjectHref, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
getAllTags.getAllTags (cognitive 23) lib/db/notion/getAllTags.js:11— getAllTags.getAllTags has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (20 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 8). Most of this is not in the body itself: 10 of the 23 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function literals inside it that branch (lines 53, 28, 18, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
ThemeSwitch (cognitive 23) components/ThemeSwitch.js:570— ThemeSwitch has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 11, boolean chains 5, if/else 4, other 2, match/switch 1. Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 16 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
render (cognitive 23) REDACTED:24— render has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 7, ternaries 4 (7 pts), if/else 4, error handling 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 22 points are the body's own statements and 1 belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
getPageTableOfContents (cognitive 23) lib/db/notion/getPageTableOfContents.js:21— getPageTableOfContents has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 1 (2 pts), other 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
LoadingCover.LoadingCover (cognitive 22) themes/endspace/components/LoadingCover.js:12— LoadingCover.LoadingCover has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (11 pts), boolean chains 8, loops 2, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function literals inside it that branch (lines 46, 84, 115, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
Catalog.Catalog (cognitive 22) themes/typography/components/Catalog.js:12— Catalog.Catalog has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 28, 20, 105). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
comparePropertyValues (cognitive 22) lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js:264— comparePropertyValues has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 7 (10 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CustomContextMenu (cognitive 22) components/CustomContextMenu.js:14— CustomContextMenu has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 8, ternaries 8, if/else 3 (4 pts), error handling 1, other 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 12 points are the body's own statements and 10 belong to 17 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
FloatingToc (cognitive 22) themes/endspace/components/FloatingToc.js:11— FloatingToc has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), ternaries 7 (8 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 22 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 41, updateProgress, a function literal at line 141, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
getNotionPost.fetchPageFromNotion (cognitive 21) lib/db/notion/getNotionPost.js:118— getNotionPost.fetchPageFromNotion has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
notion-comments.handler (cognitive 21) REDACTED:99— notion-comments.handler has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (12 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 2 (3 pts), ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
block-mapper.translateBlock (cognitive 21) scripts/translate/block-mapper.js:47— block-mapper.translateBlock has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
load-env.loadEnv (cognitive 21) scripts/translate/load-env.js:8— load-env.loadEnv has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), boolean chains 4, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NavBar.NavBar (cognitive 21) themes/claude/components/NavBar.js:54— NavBar.NavBar has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 16, if/else 3, loops 2. Of this number, 12 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
generateCustomizeSlug (cognitive 21) lib/db/notion/getPageProperties.js:277— generateCustomizeSlug has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (13 pts), boolean chains 5, other 3 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 300). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
NotionTabs (cognitive 21) components/NotionTabs.js:44— NotionTabs has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (15 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 21 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 19 function items inside it that branch (focusTab, handleKeyDown, a function literal at line 66, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Accessibility.Accessibility (cognitive 20) components/Accessibility.js:8— Accessibility.Accessibility has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13, boolean chains 5, ternaries 2. Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 144, applyAccessibilitySettings, addSkipLinks, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
PrismMac.closeCodeSidePanel (cognitive 20) components/PrismMac.js:251— PrismMac.closeCodeSidePanel has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (17 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ArticleCopyright.ArticleCopyright (cognitive 20) themes/fuwari/components/ArticleCopyright.js:13— ArticleCopyright.ArticleCopyright has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 14, if/else 3, ternaries 2, error handling 1. Of this number, 11 points are the body's own statements and 9 belong to 2 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
AdBlockerDetect.AdBlockerDetect (cognitive 20) themes/game/components/AdBlockerDetect.js:8— AdBlockerDetect.AdBlockerDetect has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (17 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (checkAdBlocker, a function literal at line 16, a function literal at line 58, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
NotionText (cognitive 20) components/NotionPage.js:364— NotionText has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), ternaries 2 (7 pts), loops 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 366). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
MobileNav (cognitive 20) themes/endspace/components/MobileNav.js:77— MobileNav has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 7, ternaries 7, if/else 6. Most of this is not in the body itself: 5 of the 20 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 205, a function literal at line 125, renderSocialIcon, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
renderStarrySky (cognitive 20) public/js/starrySky.js:6— renderStarrySky has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, loops 6 (7 pts), if/else 3 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 20 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to 13 function items inside it that branch (y::draw, y::fadeOut, y::move, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
subscribe.handler (cognitive 19) REDACTED:28— subscribe.handler has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 1 (3 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
import-legacy-docs.renderBlock (cognitive 19) scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:175— import-legacy-docs.renderBlock has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, if/else 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
MobileToc.MobileToc (cognitive 19) REDACTED:13— MobileToc.MobileToc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (10 pts), ternaries 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 43, a function literal at line 68, updateProgress, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
Header.Header (cognitive 19) themes/heo/components/Header.js:19— Header.Header has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), ternaries 5, boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 9 of the 19 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function literals inside it that branch (lines 42, 88, 86, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
enumber (cognitive 19) REDACTED:1199— enumber has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (16 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
NotionEmbed (cognitive 19) REDACTED:134— NotionEmbed has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7, boolean chains 6, ternaries 6. Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 6 belong to 6 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
getCustomMenu.getCustomMenu (cognitive 18) lib/db/notion/getCustomMenu.js:55— getCustomMenu.getCustomMenu has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 7). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 2 function literals inside it that branch (lines 67, 61). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
index.getStaticProps (cognitive 18) pages/index.js:33— index.getStaticProps has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 4). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.LayoutSearch (cognitive 18) themes/fuwari/index.js:175— index.LayoutSearch has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, ternaries 5 (8 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 16 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SearchInput.SearchInput (cognitive 18) themes/gitbook/components/SearchInput.js:11— SearchInput.SearchInput has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (handleSearch, handleKeyUp, updateSearchKey, …). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
PostBannerGroupByCategory.groupArticles (cognitive 18) themes/magzine/components/PostBannerGroupByCategory.js:45— PostBannerGroupByCategory.groupArticles has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
index.Pager (cognitive 18) themes/opc/index.js:1195— index.Pager has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, if/else 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
server.queryPagesTool (cognitive 18) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1165— server.queryPagesTool has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (11 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 3). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 1198). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
output (cognitive 18) REDACTED:1245— output has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 3). This file's own header attributes it to another copyright holder, so it is code this repository carries rather than code it wrote: restructuring the body in place forks it from upstream and turns every future re-sync into a manual merge. The performable moves are to leave the body as close to its upstream form as possible and keep it behind a narrow interface of your own, and to re-sync it when upstream changes — or, if it has already diverged far enough that you maintain it here, adopt it deliberately and then split the body into named stages.
(anonymous) (cognitive 18) themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js:221— (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12, boolean chains 5, if/else 1. Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 5 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
getOrSetDataWithCustomCache (cognitive 18) lib/cache/cache_manager.js:63— getOrSetDataWithCustomCache has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), error handling 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 18 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 85, a function literal at line 119, remove, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
PostCard (cognitive 18) themes/fuwari/components/PostList.js:32— PostCard has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 14, if/else 2, ternaries 2. Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 3 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
BlogItem (cognitive 18) themes/thoughtlite/components/BlogItem.js:12— BlogItem has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, ternaries 4 (6 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
PrismMac.renderPrismMac (cognitive 17) components/PrismMac.js:656— PrismMac.renderPrismMac has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), error handling 2 (3 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 10 points are the body's own statements and 7 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
TechGrow.TechGrow::loadReadmore (cognitive 17) components/TechGrow.js:268— TechGrow.TechGrow::loadReadmore has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (13 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
getPostBlocks.sanitizeBlockUrls (cognitive 17) REDACTED:612— getPostBlocks.sanitizeBlockUrls has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9, boolean chains 7, error handling 1. Most of this is not in the body itself: 8 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to one function item inside it that branches (fixUrl). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
getPageContentText.getPageContentText::getTableText (cognitive 17) lib/db/notion/getPageContentText.js:159— getPageContentText.getPageContentText::getTableText has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (11 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
mapImage.compressImage (cognitive 17) lib/db/notion/mapImage.js:130— mapImage.compressImage has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (9 pts), error handling 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
backfill.runBackfill (cognitive 17) scripts/translate/backfill.js:46— backfill.runBackfill has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). Of this number, 15 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
NotionMenuIcon.NotionMenuIcon (cognitive 17) themes/endspace/components/NotionMenuIcon.js:61— NotionMenuIcon.NotionMenuIcon has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (10 pts), if/else 5 (6 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SearchInput.SearchInput (cognitive 17) themes/endspace/components/SearchInput.js:10— SearchInput.SearchInput has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, ternaries 5 (6 pts), if/else 1 (nesting depth added 1). Of this number, 13 points are the body's own statements and 4 belong to 4 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
Catalog.Catalog (cognitive 17) themes/magzine/components/Catalog.js:12— Catalog.Catalog has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 2 (3 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 3 function literals inside it that branch (lines 32, 21, 74). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
(anonymous) (cognitive 17) components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:168— (anonymous) has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 5 function items inside it that branch (handleKeyDown, focusInput, a function literal at line 187, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
LayoutBase (cognitive 17) themes/next/index.js:52— LayoutBase has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9, boolean chains 4, ternaries 4. Most of this is not in the body itself: 6 of the 17 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 7 function literals inside it that branch (lines 75, 101, 70, …). The decisions are inside those literals, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literals' work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have each literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
themeSwitch.manifest.getThemeSwitchMeta (cognitive 16) conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js:554— themeSwitch.manifest.getThemeSwitchMeta has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8, boolean chains 5, if/else 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
SiteDataApi.getSiteInfo (cognitive 16) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:920— SiteDataApi.getSiteInfo has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, ternaries 4 (5 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
notionComments.validateCommentPayload (cognitive 16) lib/plugins/notionComments.js:30— notionComments.validateCommentPayload has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 6, ternaries 1. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
import-legacy-docs.textOf (cognitive 16) scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:115— import-legacy-docs.textOf has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (nesting depth added 5). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 16 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 118). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal's work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest.
GameEmbed.GameEmbed (cognitive 16) themes/game/components/GameEmbed.js:15— GameEmbed.GameEmbed has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 6, ternaries 1. Of this number, 8 points are the body's own statements and 8 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
Header.Header (cognitive 16) themes/movie/components/Header.js:16— Header.Header has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (11 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). Most of this is not in the body itself: 7 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 6 function items inside it that branch (onKeyUp, toggleShowSearchInput, a function literal at line 76, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
normalizeDraftInput (cognitive 16) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:567— normalizeDraftInput has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 8, ternaries 6, if/else 2. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ShareButtons (cognitive 16) REDACTED:69— ShareButtons has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 3, match/switch 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 1). Most of this is not in the body itself: 2 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 14 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 189, buildShareUrl, renderCommonShareButton, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
TopNav (cognitive 16) themes/next/components/TopNav.js:20— TopNav has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8, boolean chains 6, ternaries 2. Most of this is not in the body itself: 4 of the 16 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 10 function items inside it that branch (a function literal at line 35, a function literal at line 62, showSearchModal, …). The named helpers are already separate functions; the literals' work cannot be called, reviewed or tested from outside this body. To reduce it, move the named helpers out of the body to the enclosing scope and lift each literal's work into a named function there, so each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest.
SidePanel (cognitive 16) themes/fuwari/components/SidePanel.js:14— SidePanel has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 15, ternaries 1. Of this number, 14 points are the body's own statements and 2 belong to 3 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ClassTooLong: ProfileHome REDACTED:1— ClassTooLong — 654 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 254 over it, 1.64× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs· Both branches are identical · ×1
Both branches are identical — the condition decides nothing REDACTED:16— Both arms of this conditional expression are the same, so no input can make the condition matter. Implement the distinction that was intended, or drop the condition.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs· Markup wires an event to an empty handler · ×1
Markup wires an event to an empty handler themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js:167— `onClick` is wired to an arrow whose body is empty — the markup attaches a listener that does nothing. Implement the handler, or remove the attribute that wires it.
No structured logging — No logging call was found in the 1234 Python, JavaScript/TypeScript production file(s) this check read across 2 module(s). Each was searched for its ecosystem's logging libraries (Python: logging, structlog, loguru; JavaScript/TypeScript: pino, winston, bunyan, log4js, loglevel, consola, the NestJS Logger) and for a call on a receiver named `log`/`logger` (or ending in `Logger`/`_logger`) with a level verb. It cannot see logging through a repo-local wrapper named otherwise, or in source it did not read — this is 'no logging found by this walk', not a verdict that nothing here logs. If it is right, production issues will be hard to diagnose.
Forked directory tree (32 identical files, ~1871 lines × 2 trees) themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1— themes/proxio/ and themes/starter/ are near-verbatim copies of each other: 32 files are byte-identical under the same relative paths (~1871 lines; the trees hold 56 and 53 files). That is one structural fact, not 32 local ones: every edit made to one tree and not the other drifts silently, which is the failure whole-tree forks guarantee. Pick one tree as the single source and produce the other from it (generated, copied at build or release time, or re-exported) — or, if the copy is a stale snapshot nothing produces any more, delete it. Check first whether the copy is a deliberately published deliverable (a template consumers copy verbatim, a released sample frozen at a version); where it is, keep it produced from the source tree rather than edited in place.
Forked directory tree (18 identical files, ~863 lines × 2 trees) themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:1— themes/movie/ and themes/photo/ are near-verbatim copies of each other: 18 files are byte-identical under the same relative paths (~863 lines; the trees hold 32 and 36 files). That is one structural fact, not 18 local ones: every edit made to one tree and not the other drifts silently, which is the failure whole-tree forks guarantee. Pick one tree as the single source and produce the other from it (generated, copied at build or release time, or re-exported) — or, if the copy is a stale snapshot nothing produces any more, delete it. Check first whether the copy is a deliberately published deliverable (a template consumers copy verbatim, a released sample frozen at a version); where it is, keep it produced from the source tree rather than edited in place.
Duplication concentrated across 25 sibling directories (410 clone groups) themes/movie/index.js:3— 410 duplicated blocks under themes/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories claude, commerce, endspace, fukasawa, fuwari, game (+19 more sibling(s) not listed) — 356 of them are reported below, and 54 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 410 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 410 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 410 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.
Duplication concentrated across 6 sibling directories (19 clone groups) components/Collapse.js:29— 19 duplicated blocks under the repository root have copies in at least two of the sibling directories components, lib, public, scripts, themes, tools — 12 of them are reported below, and 7 are counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 19 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 19 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 19 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.
Duplication concentrated across 7 sibling directories (8 clone groups) pages/category/[category]/page/[page].js:24— 8 duplicated blocks under pages/ have copies in at least two of the sibling directories archive, category, page, search, sign-in, sign-up (+1 more sibling(s) not listed) — 7 of them are reported below, and 1 is counted here but not reported individually: those copies match on shape but no longer clear R10's bar for an individually reported row — either they kept neither their own names nor their values, or what was copied is too small to stand on its own (it reports near-exact duplication only, and only of substantial extent). What this row states is the concentration, which the detector measured over all 8 and which does not depend on how exactly each block's copies still match. That concentration is one structural fact, not 8 local ones: the siblings replicate behaviour none of them owns, which is the shape of a missing shared module — a common library every sibling imports — rather than 8 separate extractions. Check first whether the siblings are deliberately standalone deliverables (scaffold templates, demo apps that must stay copy-pasteable); where they are, the duplication is the design and the per-block rows are the ones to act on.
Wholesale file copy (221 identical lines × 2 files) themes/movie/index.js:3— themes/movie/index.js:3 · themes/photo/index.js:3 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 221 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Wholesale file copy (207 identical lines × 2 files) themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1— themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 207 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Wholesale file copy (203 identical lines × 2 files) themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1— themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 203 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (186 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (186 matched lines × 2 locations) themes/simple/index.js:43— themes/simple/index.js:43 · themes/typography/index.js:46 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 935 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (163 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (163 matched lines × 2 locations) REDACTED:143— REDACTED:143 · themes/hexo/index.js:186 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 707 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (162 lines × 2 locations) themes/proxio/index.js:380— themes/proxio/index.js:380 · themes/starter/index.js:349 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Wholesale file copy (147 identical lines × 2 files) themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1— themes/proxio/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1 · themes/starter/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 147 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Duplicated block (141 lines × 3 locations) themes/commerce/components/SocialButton.js:10— themes/commerce/components/SocialButton.js:10 · themes/plog/components/SocialButton.js:10 · themes/starter/components/SocialButton.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Wholesale file copy (136 identical lines × 3 files) themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:1— themes/fukasawa/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/gitbook/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/magzine/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 3 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 136 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (135 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (135 matched lines × 2 locations) themes/claude/index.js:17— themes/claude/index.js:17 · themes/typography/index.js:25 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 800 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (132 lines × 2 locations) themes/nobelium/index.js:192— themes/nobelium/index.js:192 · themes/plog/index.js:147 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
Wholesale file copy (107 identical lines × 2 files) themes/proxio/components/SignUpForm.js:1— themes/proxio/components/SignUpForm.js:1 · themes/starter/components/SignUpForm.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 107 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Duplicated block (99 lines × 3 locations) themes/commerce/components/SearchInput.js:6— themes/commerce/components/SearchInput.js:6 · themes/hexo/components/SearchInput.js:6 · themes/matery/components/SearchInput.js:6 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete.
Wholesale file copy (96 identical lines × 3 files) themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1— themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 · themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 · themes/photo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1 — these 3 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 96 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Duplicated block (94 lines × 2 locations) themes/proxio/components/SearchInput.js:12— themes/proxio/components/SearchInput.js:12 · themes/starter/components/SearchInput.js:12 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
Wholesale file copy (85 identical lines × 2 files) themes/proxio/components/SocialButton.js:1— themes/proxio/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/typography/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 85 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Duplicated block (81 lines × 3 locations) themes/commerce/components/Catalog.js:13— themes/commerce/components/Catalog.js:13 · themes/hexo/components/Catalog.js:13 · themes/matery/components/Catalog.js:13 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete.
Wholesale file copy (81 identical lines × 2 files) themes/next/components/SocialButton.js:1— themes/next/components/SocialButton.js:1 · themes/simple/components/SocialButton.js:1 — these 2 files are line-for-line copies of one another — 81 lines are identical, in the same order, in every one of them — so this is one fact about the file set, not a block to extract. An edit made to one file and not the others changes behaviour silently, which is the failure a wholesale copy guarantees. Pick one file as the single source and derive the others from it (re-export it, spread it into the local overrides each variant genuinely needs, or generate the copies at build time) — the few lines that differ between the files are exactly the part each variant should still own. Check first whether the copies are deliberately standalone deliverables (a translation file seeded from its sibling and waiting to be translated); where they are, the duplication is the design, and the honest move is to mark the seeded file as untranslated rather than to let it pass as done.
Duplicated block (79 lines × 2 locations) themes/movie/components/SearchInput.js:7— themes/movie/components/SearchInput.js:7 · themes/photo/components/SearchInput.js:7 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
Duplicated block (78 lines × 2 locations) themes/proxio/components/DarkModeButton.js:4— themes/proxio/components/DarkModeButton.js:4 · themes/starter/components/DarkModeButton.js:4 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
Duplicated block (77 lines × 3 locations) themes/claude/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10— themes/claude/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/simple/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/typography/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Duplicated block (74 lines × 3 locations) themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:9— themes/game/components/SearchInput.js:9 · themes/nobelium/components/SearchInput.js:9 · themes/plog/components/SearchInput.js:8 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another. There is one copy in each of 3 separate files rather than several in one place, so check first whether these are sibling modules that each declare their own version of one shape — one per entity, per provider, per language. Where they are, no single extracted module collapses them: each module still has to be written, and what recurs is the TEMPLATE. The moves that do collapse a template are to generate these modules from the set they enumerate, or to replace the repeated construction with one factory each site calls with its own values — and where the set is the point, each module pinning one distinct thing, the repetition IS the enumeration and there is nothing to delete.
Duplicated block (74 lines × 2 locations) themes/gitbook/index.js:515— themes/gitbook/index.js:515 · themes/magzine/index.js:519 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 directories, so the shared home is a decision rather than an obvious spot: check first whether one of them already owns this behaviour, and otherwise put the extracted module somewhere all of the sites already reach rather than making one of them depend on another.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (74 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (74 matched lines × 2 locations) themes/matery/index.js:230— themes/matery/index.js:230 · themes/medium/index.js:185 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 327 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (72 lines × 2 locations) public/js/aos.js:220— public/js/aos.js:220 · public/js/aos.js:362 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (72 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (72 matched lines × 2 locations) themes/nobelium/components/Nav.js:80— themes/nobelium/components/Nav.js:80 · themes/plog/components/Nav.js:47 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 325 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (71 lines × 3 locations) themes/game/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10— themes/game/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/nobelium/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/plog/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 3 copies are spread across 3 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Duplicated block (70 lines × 2 locations) public/js/aos.js:142— public/js/aos.js:142 · public/js/aos.js:295 — all 2 copies are in the same file, and the CITED SPAN is not a self-contained block — it runs from inside one construct into the next (the tail of a branch plus the head of the following one, a run of switch arms, the end of a declaration plus the list that follows it) rather than covering a whole unit. So do not lift these lines literally: no call can be substituted for a half-open construct. Extract the enclosing repeated UNIT instead — the whole function, component or branch these lines sit in — and where the repetition IS the construct (a run of switch arms, a stack of near-identical declarations) replace it with one table or registry looked up by key rather than a helper each arm calls. The copies still drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is why this is reported.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (68 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (68 matched lines × 2 locations) functions/api/ai-chat.ts:46— functions/api/ai-chat.ts:46 · functions/api/docs-chat.ts:65 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 484 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
R10 · Code Duplication· Duplicated block with local edits (67 matched lines × 2 locations) · ×1
Duplicated block with local edits (67 matched lines × 2 locations) pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:22— pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:22 · pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js:25 — the two spans are one implementation copied and then locally edited — 384 tokens are still identical, in the same order in both files, with only local edits between them. The copies have already begun to drift, which is this row's finding: an edit made to one and not the other changes behaviour silently. Diff the two spans first to learn what genuinely differs, then extract the shared core into one module both sites use, passing the differences in as parameters — or, if one copy exists only because the other could not be imported from its context, make one of them the single source the other is generated or re-exported from. If one copy is no longer reachable, delete it rather than letting it shadow the live one.
Duplicated block (66 lines × 2 locations) themes/movie/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10— themes/movie/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 · themes/photo/components/MenuItemCollapse.js:10 — the 2 copies are spread across 2 files, and the SHAPE of this repetition could not be determined. It is not a run of declarations, a listing, a declaration header, a type body or a slice through a construct — and it was not measured as a run of executable statements either, so this row cannot tell you whether a function can stand where these lines are. Read the two spans before acting, because the move is opposite in the two cases. Where they are statements, the ordinary answer holds: give the shared part one home and call it from each site. Where they turn out to be declarations, a literal's entries, or the cases of an enumeration, there is no call site to call anything from, and collapsing them would delete what each copy pins — a shared base type, a generated set, or one exported constant each site refers to is the move instead, and sometimes the honest answer is that there is nothing to extract at all. Reported because the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited, which is true whichever of those they are.
Complex function _go2 (cyclomatic 67, cognitive 53) REDACTED:1402— _go2 has cyclomatic complexity 67 and cognitive complexity 53; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity· Complex function t (cyclomatic 59, cognitive 84) · ×1
Complex function t (cyclomatic 59, cognitive 84) public/js/mouse-follow.js:200— t has cyclomatic complexity 59 and cognitive complexity 84; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function ExternalPlugin (cyclomatic 51, cognitive 45) REDACTED:22— ExternalPlugin has cyclomatic complexity 51 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function (top-level) (cyclomatic 47, cognitive 46) conf/comment.config.js:5— (top-level) has cyclomatic complexity 47 and cognitive complexity 46; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function siteConfig (cyclomatic 45, cognitive 25) lib/config.js:17— siteConfig has cyclomatic complexity 45 and cognitive complexity 25; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function readNotionPropertyValue (cyclomatic 41, cognitive 21) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1032— readNotionPropertyValue has cyclomatic complexity 41 and cognitive complexity 21; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function translateOnePage (cyclomatic 39, cognitive 44) scripts/translate/pipeline.js:33— translateOnePage has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 44; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function (top-level) (cyclomatic 39, cognitive 38) REDACTED:3— (top-level) has cyclomatic complexity 39 and cognitive complexity 38; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function output (cyclomatic 38, cognitive 42) REDACTED:831— output has cyclomatic complexity 38 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
R2 · Cyclomatic Complexity· Complex function SEO (cyclomatic 37, cognitive 34) · ×1
Complex function SEO (cyclomatic 37, cognitive 34) REDACTED:15— SEO has cyclomatic complexity 37 and cognitive complexity 34; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function handler (cyclomatic 35, cognitive 34) pages/api/revalidate.js:16— handler has cyclomatic complexity 35 and cognitive complexity 34; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function renderBlock (cyclomatic 33, cognitive 19) scripts/import-legacy-docs.mjs:175— renderBlock has cyclomatic complexity 33 and cognitive complexity 19; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive sits below cyclomatic here, so much of the count is breadth — arms side by side rather than stacked — and splitting per arm would leave a function per arm; group the work between the checks into named steps instead. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function parseConfigFromPage (cyclomatic 32, cognitive 45) lib/db/notion/getNotionConfig.js:87— parseConfigFromPage has cyclomatic complexity 32 and cognitive complexity 45; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function collectRevalidationPaths (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 66) lib/server/revalidation.js:35— collectRevalidationPaths has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 66; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function resolvePostProps (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 42) lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:383— resolvePostProps has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function EndspacePlayer (cyclomatic 29, cognitive 36) themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:220— EndspacePlayer has cyclomatic complexity 29 and cognitive complexity 36; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function validateObject (cyclomatic 27, cognitive 42) lib/middleware/security.js:124— validateObject has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 42; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
Complex function buildPropertyBySchema (cyclomatic 27, cognitive 27) tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:770— buildPropertyBySchema has cyclomatic complexity 27 and cognitive complexity 27; this row is raised above a cyclomatic bar of 10. The two numbers answer different questions and the gap between them is what decides whether to act: cyclomatic counts the independent arms through the body, cognitive counts what it costs to hold them in your head, so nesting and mixed boolean chains raise it while a flat run of independent arms does not. Cognitive is at or above cyclomatic here, so the branching is nested or entangled rather than laid out side by side — extracting each decision into its own named function is the change that pays. Measured by this repository's own parse of the file, so a body assembled at runtime, or generated, is counted as written rather than as it executes.
themes/claude/style.js: 2640 lines of code themes/claude/style.js:1— themes/claude/style.js has 2640 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
REDACTED: 1674 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 1674 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js · ×1
tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js: 1671 lines of code tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1— tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js has 1671 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/opc/index.js: 1223 lines of code themes/opc/index.js:1— themes/opc/index.js has 1223 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
lib/db/SiteDataApi.js: 1024 lines of code lib/db/SiteDataApi.js:1— lib/db/SiteDataApi.js has 1024 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/endspace/style.js: 984 lines of code themes/endspace/style.js:1— themes/endspace/style.js has 984 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
REDACTED: 876 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 876 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
components/ThemeSwitch.js: 752 lines of code components/ThemeSwitch.js:1— components/ThemeSwitch.js has 752 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
public/js/mouse-follow.js: 699 lines of code public/js/mouse-follow.js:1— public/js/mouse-follow.js has 699 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
public/js/aos.js: 671 lines of code public/js/aos.js:1— public/js/aos.js has 671 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
components/PrismMac.js: 649 lines of code components/PrismMac.js:1— components/PrismMac.js has 649 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js · ×1
conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js: 612 lines of code conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js:1— conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js has 612 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/fuwari/style.js: 591 lines of code themes/fuwari/style.js:1— themes/fuwari/style.js has 591 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/magzine/index.js: 574 lines of code themes/magzine/index.js:1— themes/magzine/index.js has 574 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/gitbook/index.js: 568 lines of code themes/gitbook/index.js:1— themes/gitbook/index.js has 568 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
REDACTED: 564 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 564 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
REDACTED: 554 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 554 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/proxio/index.js: 543 lines of code themes/proxio/index.js:1— themes/proxio/index.js has 543 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/starter/index.js: 519 lines of code themes/starter/index.js:1— themes/starter/index.js has 519 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js · ×1
themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js: 518 lines of code themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js:1— themes/endspace/components/EndspacePlayer.js has 518 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/endspace/index.js: 491 lines of code themes/endspace/index.js:1— themes/endspace/index.js has 491 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
REDACTED: 480 lines of code REDACTED:1— REDACTED has 480 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/heo/index.js: 464 lines of code themes/heo/index.js:1— themes/heo/index.js has 464 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/photo/index.js: 457 lines of code themes/photo/index.js:1— themes/photo/index.js has 457 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
components/TechGrow.js: 452 lines of code components/TechGrow.js:1— components/TechGrow.js has 452 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/movie/index.js: 452 lines of code themes/movie/index.js:1— themes/movie/index.js has 452 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js · ×1
lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js: 451 lines of code lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js:1— lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js has 451 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js · ×1
components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js: 444 lines of code components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js:1— components/AlgoliaSearchModal.js has 444 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
R3 · Large Files· lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js · ×1
lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js: 438 lines of code lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:1— lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js has 438 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/nav/index.js: 432 lines of code themes/nav/index.js:1— themes/nav/index.js has 432 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/next/index.js: 430 lines of code themes/next/index.js:1— themes/next/index.js has 430 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/game/index.js: 427 lines of code themes/game/index.js:1— themes/game/index.js has 427 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/hexo/index.js: 417 lines of code themes/hexo/index.js:1— themes/hexo/index.js has 417 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
themes/medium/index.js: 413 lines of code themes/medium/index.js:1— themes/medium/index.js has 413 significant lines (blank lines excluded), over the 400-line bar, and contains logic — a file this long is usually several responsibilities in one module.
Dead file (~357 LoC) lib/middleware/security.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~343 LoC) lib/config/env-validation.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~278 LoC) lib/utils/sitemap.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~277 LoC) components/Accessibility.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~237 LoC) types/index.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~219 LoC) functions/api/ai-chat.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~200 LoC) functions/api/docs-chat.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~161 LoC) lib/db/notion/CustomNotionApi.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~87 LoC) components/PerformanceMonitor.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~64 LoC) lib/plugins/aiSummary.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~61 LoC) lighthouserc.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~31 LoC) jest.env.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~25 LoC) lib/cache/vercel_cache.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~21 LoC) lib/utils/clean.util.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~19 LoC) components/ChatBase.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~13 LoC) lib/utils/time.util.ts— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~12 LoC) components/TwikooRecentComments.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Dead file (~11 LoC) lib/db/notion/getMetadata.js— no import path from any entry point (94 application, 42 tooling, 99 test roots considered), and no other file in the scanned tree imports it — nothing in-repo names this module at all, which is the strongest form of this claim the import graph can make
Unused dependency '@ai-sdk/vue' — Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members — no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it.
Unused dependency 'critters' — Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members — no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it.
Unused dependency 'gsap' — Declared in the root package.json but never imported anywhere in that package or its workspace members — no static import reaches it. Usually that is dead weight and attack surface, but two shapes are indistinguishable from source and are NOT dead: an optional or native peer that another dependency loads dynamically at runtime, and a package a build, docs or test step installs and invokes separately. Confirm which of the three this is before removing it.
S1 · Web-Security Posture· Password key derivation is priced too cheaply · ×1
Password key derivation is priced too cheaply tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js:1570— This code fixes scrypt at N=16,384 (r=8, p=1), Node's default. A key-derivation function's only defence is the cost of ONE guess, and that cost is this number — the algorithm choice does not set it. Current OWASP guidance is 1,300,000 PBKDF2 iterations with HMAC-SHA1, 600,000 with SHA-256 and 210,000 with SHA-512; scrypt at N=2^17, r=8, p=1 (or an equivalent N·r·p product); Argon2id at 19 MiB of memory and 2 iterations (or an equivalent row); bcrypt at a work factor of at least 10. This figure divides the attacker's work by a factor of tens or hundreds against the same stolen hash, on hardware they already own. Where what is derived is short or low-entropy — a PIN, a numeric parental code, a four-character token — the whole keyspace falls in the time this parameter buys, and no salt or constant-time comparison changes that. Raise the count to the current published figure for the PRF you use, measure it on the slowest hardware that must run it (a target of roughly 100 ms per derivation is the usual budget), and read the value from configuration so a deployment can raise it again without a rebuild. Where the derived value must interoperate with a format someone else fixed, the count cannot move — derive a SEPARATE value for anything you own rather than inheriting the external format's price.
Third-party script without Subresource Integrity public/dplayer.htm:30— `https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hls.js@latest` is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request — the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path — runs arbitrary script in this page's origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time — the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository. 2 such include(s) across the repository's markup.
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped· Document value reaches a markup attribute unescaped · ×1
Document value reaches a markup attribute unescaped components/PrismMac.js:566— `label` carries text this program read out of a document — an attribute or a text node, which the DOM hands back already decoded, so an entity its author wrote is a live character again — and it is written straight into the text of an element of markup built here with nothing escaping it on the way. The value is chosen by whoever authored that document, not by this program, so it can close the attribute or element it sits in and open another — a crafted document becomes markup in what this code renders. Escape `label` at this site, or validate it against the shape the position accepts before interpolating it.
Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded) lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:87— `catch (e)` takes every exception and records none of it — the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter.
Orphaned file themes/photo/index.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/starter/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/typography/index.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/starter/components/SignUpForm.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/starter/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/nobelium/index.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/simple/index.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/config/env-validation.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/middleware/security.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file components/Accessibility.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file components/FacebookMessenger.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/heo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file components/ui/dashboard/DashboardItemOrder.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file lib/utils/sitemap.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file components/ui/dashboard/DashboardItemAffliate.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/photo/components/PaginationNumber.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/movie/components/PaginationNumber.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file REDACTED:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/plog/components/Modal.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/hexo/components/Header.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file components/HeroIcons.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/fukasawa/components/AsideLeft.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/starter/components/svg/SVGCircleBG.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file themes/heo/components/SlideOver.js:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Duplicated predicate functions/api/ai-chat.ts:65— `!allowed.includes('*') && !allowed.includes(origin)` appears character-identically in 2 files — functions/api/ai-chat.ts, functions/api/docs-chat.ts. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/movie/index.js:165— `!assetWrappers || assetWrappers.length === 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/movie/index.js, themes/photo/index.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate REDACTED:613— `!blockValue || typeof blockValue !== 'object'` appears character-identically in 2 files — REDACTED, lib/db/notion/normalizeExternalMediaBlock.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/commerce/components/NavButtonGroup.js:10— `!categoryOptions || categoryOptions.length === 0` appears character-identically in 5 files — themes/commerce/components/NavButtonGroup.js, themes/heo/components/NavButtonGroup.js, themes/hexo/components/NavButtonGroup.js, themes/movie/components/CategoryGroup.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/claude/components/Catalog.js:157— `!currentSectionId && sections.length > 0` appears character-identically in 3 files — themes/claude/components/Catalog.js, themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js, themes/typography/components/Catalog.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/matery/components/Announcement.js:8— `!notice || Object.keys(notice).length === 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/matery/components/Announcement.js, themes/photo/components/Announcement.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/endspace/components/MobileNav.js:72— `!path || path.startsWith('http') || path.startsWith('#')` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/endspace/components/MobileNav.js, themes/endspace/components/SideNav.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/claude/components/Catalog.js:127— `!post || !filteredToc || filteredToc.length < 1` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/claude/components/Catalog.js, themes/proxio/components/Catalog.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/simple/components/Catalog.js:57— `!post || !post?.toc || post?.toc?.length < 1` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/simple/components/Catalog.js, themes/typography/components/Catalog.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/commerce/components/BlogPostListPage.js:20— `!posts || posts.length === 0 || page > totalPage` appears character-identically in 4 files — themes/commerce/components/BlogPostListPage.js, themes/heo/components/BlogPostListPage.js, themes/hexo/components/BlogPostListPage.js, themes/matery/components/BlogPostListPage.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/commerce/components/BlogPostListScroll.js:65— `!postsToShow || postsToShow.length === 0` appears character-identically in 7 files — themes/commerce/components/BlogPostListScroll.js, themes/heo/components/BlogPostListScroll.js, themes/hexo/components/BlogPostListScroll.js, themes/magzine/components/PostListScroll.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/claude/components/Catalog.js:145— `!section || !(section instanceof Element)` appears character-identically in 20 files — themes/claude/components/Catalog.js, themes/commerce/components/Catalog.js, themes/endspace/components/FloatingControls.js, themes/endspace/components/FloatingToc.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/movie/index.js:190— `!wrapper.classList.contains('notion-asset-wrapper-video') && !wrapper.classList.contains('notion-asset-wrapper-embed')` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/movie/index.js, themes/photo/index.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate pages/search/[keyword]/index.js:102— `(post.results.length - 1) / hitCount < 3 || i === 0` appears character-identically in 2 files — pages/search/[keyword]/index.js, pages/search/[keyword]/page/[page].js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate scripts/translate/load-env.js:22— `(value.startsWith('"') && value.endsWith('"')) || (value.startsWith("'") && value.endsWith("'"))` appears character-identically in 2 files — scripts/translate/load-env.js, tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/claude/components/menu.js:63— `Array.isArray(customNav) && customNav.length > 0` appears character-identically in 4 files — themes/claude/components/menu.js, themes/endspace/components/menu.js, themes/fuwari/components/menu.js, themes/xuhome/components/NavBar.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate lib/utils/rss.js:156— `NOTION_CONFIG?.SUB_PATH || BLOG.SUB_PATH` appears character-identically in 2 files — lib/utils/rss.js, pages/api/rss.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/hexo/components/Hero.js:28— `Number(siteConfig('GREETING_WORDS_BACK_SPEED')) || 100` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/hexo/components/Hero.js, themes/matery/components/Hero.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/hexo/components/Hero.js:26— `Number(siteConfig('GREETING_WORDS_TYPE_SPEED')) || 200` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/hexo/components/Hero.js, themes/matery/components/Hero.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/commerce/components/Progress.js:21— `currentRef || (isBrowser && document.getElementById('article-wrapper'))` appears character-identically in 6 files — themes/commerce/components/Progress.js, themes/hexo/components/Progress.js, themes/magzine/components/Progress.js, themes/matery/components/Progress.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/gitbook/components/Progress.js:21— `currentRef || (isBrowser && document.getElementById('posts-wrapper'))` appears character-identically in 2 files — themes/gitbook/components/Progress.js, themes/nav/components/Progress.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate components/NotionTabs.js:6— `entry?.value?.value || entry?.value || entry` appears character-identically in 4 files — components/NotionTabs.js, lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js, lib/server/postAccess.js, lib/utils/publicPost.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/gitbook/components/NavPostList.js:136— `existingGroup && existingGroup.category === categoryName` appears character-identically in 3 files — themes/gitbook/components/NavPostList.js, themes/magzine/components/PostBannerGroupByCategory.js, themes/nav/components/BlogPostListAll.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate themes/game/components/GameListNormal.js:18— `gamesClone?.length > 0 && index < maxCount` appears character-identically in 3 files — themes/game/components/GameListNormal.js, themes/game/components/GameListRealate.js, themes/game/components/GameListRecent.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Duplicated predicate components/DebugPanel.js:17— `getQueryParam(router.asPath, 'theme') || theme` appears character-identically in 2 files — components/DebugPanel.js, components/ThemeSwitch.js. It is one line, so the duplication detector's token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home.
Deprecated: @clerk/clerk-react REDACTED:686— @clerk/clerk-react 5.12.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This package is no longer supported. Please use @clerk/react instead. See the upgrade guide for more info: https://clerk.com/docs/guides/development/upgrading/upgrade-guides/core-3". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: @clerk/types REDACTED:738— @clerk/types 4.26.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This package is no longer supported. Please import types from @clerk/shared/types instead. See the upgrade guide for more info: https://clerk.com/docs/guides/development/upgrading/upgrade-guides/core-3". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: @clerk/types REDACTED:745— @clerk/types 4.101.27 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This package is no longer supported. Please import types from @clerk/shared/types instead. See the upgrade guide for more info: https://clerk.com/docs/guides/development/upgrading/upgrade-guides/core-3". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: @humanwhocodes/config-array REDACTED:1013— @humanwhocodes/config-array 0.13.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Use @eslint/config-array instead". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: @humanwhocodes/object-schema REDACTED:1027— @humanwhocodes/object-schema 2.0.3 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Use @eslint/object-schema instead". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: @ungap/structured-clone REDACTED:2433— @ungap/structured-clone 1.2.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Potential CWE-502 - Update to 1.3.1 or higher". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: abab REDACTED:2676— abab 2.0.6 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Use your platform's native atob() and btoa() methods instead". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: crypto-js REDACTED:3652— crypto-js 4.2.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Active development of CryptoJS has been discontinued. This library is no longer maintained.". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: domexception REDACTED:3995— domexception 4.0.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Use your platform's native DOMException instead". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: glob REDACTED:5028— glob 7.1.7 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting i@izs.me". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: glob REDACTED:5040— glob 10.4.5 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting i@izs.me". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: glob REDACTED:5052— glob 7.2.3 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Old versions of glob are not supported, and contain widely publicized security vulnerabilities, which have been fixed in the current version. Please update. Support for old versions may be purchased (at exorbitant rates) by contacting i@izs.me". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: inflight REDACTED:5348— inflight 1.0.6 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "This module is not supported, and leaks memory. Do not use it. Check out lru-cache if you want a good and tested way to coalesce async requests by a key value, which is much more comprehensive and powerful.". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: rimraf REDACTED:7855— rimraf 3.0.2 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Rimraf versions prior to v4 are no longer supported". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Deprecated: whatwg-encoding REDACTED:9206— whatwg-encoding 2.0.0 is resolved in REDACTED and is marked deprecated by its publisher: "Use @exodus/bytes instead for a more spec-conformant and faster implementation". This repository does not declare it — a direct dependency pulls it in, so the move is to upgrade or replace that dependency.
Blanket warning suppression components/FacebookMessenger.js:109— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression components/FlutteringRibbon.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression components/Sakura.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression lib/plugins/busuanzi.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression REDACTED:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression public/js/flutteringRibbon.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression REDACTED:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression public/js/mouse-follow.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression public/js/nest.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression public/js/ribbon.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression public/js/starrySky.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
Blanket warning suppression themes/nav/components/BlogPostListAll.js:1— A bare `eslint-disable` or `@ts-nocheck` with no rule list switches every lint rule or the whole type checker off for the rest of the file — hidden debt. Disable the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead.
IC1 · Incompleteness & stubs· Empty method body · ×6
Empty method body jest.setup.js:57— `disconnect` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Empty method body jest.setup.js:58— `observe` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Empty method body jest.setup.js:59— `unobserve` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Empty method body jest.setup.js:65— `disconnect` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Empty method body jest.setup.js:66— `observe` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Empty method body jest.setup.js:67— `unobserve` has an empty body — confirm it's an intentional no-op and not an unfinished method.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex scripts/bump-package-patch-version.js:37— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/validation.js:20— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/validation.js:21— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/validation.js:22— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/validation.js:23— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Hand-rolled JSON/XML parsing via regex lib/utils/validation.js:24— A regex whose pattern encodes JSON/XML syntax is parsing a structured format by hand — malformed or differently-typed content (e.g. `"amount": "5"` as a string) silently mis-parses instead of failing validation. This JavaScript/TypeScript code already uses a real parser in the same package; use it here too.
Classify ADR enforcement: 原创存证自动公开清单任务 docs/developer/rfc/2026-originality-proof-auto-manifest.md— This record carries no `enforcement:` field, so nothing says whether the decision is checked by anything or is upheld by convention alone — and an unclassified record is counted as UNENFORCED in this dimension's score, which is the same bucket as a rule known to have no check behind it. If this is a mechanizable rule, add an analyzer/test (or `enforcement: analyzer|test`); if it's a design decision, mark `enforcement: not-applicable` so it isn't counted as unenforced.
Classify ADR enforcement: 原创存证体验优化任务 docs/developer/rfc/2026-originality-proof-ux.md— This record carries no `enforcement:` field, so nothing says whether the decision is checked by anything or is upheld by convention alone — and an unclassified record is counted as UNENFORCED in this dimension's score, which is the same bucket as a rule known to have no check behind it. If this is a mechanizable rule, add an analyzer/test (or `enforcement: analyzer|test`); if it's a design decision, mark `enforcement: not-applicable` so it isn't counted as unenforced.
Classify ADR enforcement: RFC: 代码折叠块桌面与移动端 UI 收敛 docs/developer/rfc/issue-2941-code-block-ui-refinement.md— This record carries no `enforcement:` field, so nothing says whether the decision is checked by anything or is upheld by convention alone — and an unclassified record is counted as UNENFORCED in this dimension's score, which is the same bucket as a rule known to have no check behind it. If this is a mechanizable rule, add an analyzer/test (or `enforcement: analyzer|test`); if it's a design decision, mark `enforcement: not-applicable` so it isn't counted as unenforced.
Classify ADR enforcement: RFC: 代码块侧栏预览 docs/developer/rfc/issue-2941-code-sidebar.md— This record carries no `enforcement:` field, so nothing says whether the decision is checked by anything or is upheld by convention alone — and an unclassified record is counted as UNENFORCED in this dimension's score, which is the same bucket as a rule known to have no check behind it. If this is a mechanizable rule, add an analyzer/test (or `enforcement: analyzer|test`); if it's a design decision, mark `enforcement: not-applicable` so it isn't counted as unenforced.
Classify ADR enforcement: RFC: 支持 Notion 选项卡块 docs/developer/rfc/issue-3948-notion-tabs.md— This record carries no `enforcement:` field, so nothing says whether the decision is checked by anything or is upheld by convention alone — and an unclassified record is counted as UNENFORCED in this dimension's score, which is the same bucket as a rule known to have no check behind it. If this is a mechanizable rule, add an analyzer/test (or `enforcement: analyzer|test`); if it's a design decision, mark `enforcement: not-applicable` so it isn't counted as unenforced.
Mock-dominated test: adapts and formats blockMap before rendering RSS content __tests__/lib/utils/rss.test.js:59— This test sets up 4 test doubles (for example `vi.mock/jest.mock of an imported module`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 5 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: uses summary without fetching blocks when RSS_FULL_CONTENT is disabled __tests__/lib/utils/rss.test.js:116— This test sets up 4 test doubles (for example `vi.mock/jest.mock of an imported module`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 5 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Mock-dominated test: does not unregister when switching from disabled to enabled before getRegistration resolves __tests__/components/PWAInstaller.test.js:39— This test sets up 3 test doubles (for example `a double assigned in a shared setup`) against 0 real object(s) of its own, and its only verification is 4 check(s) that the doubles were called. It pins how the code is wired, not what it does: it passes with a wrong result and fails when a call is harmlessly reordered or merged. Assert the outcome instead (the value returned, the state left behind), build collaborators and value objects for real or with a small hand-written fake, and keep doubles for the boundaries the test cannot own — the network, the clock, the file system.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1 — If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 39 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: themes/opc/index.js, themes/endspace/style.js, conf/themeSwitch.manifest.js, lib/db/notion/filterCollectionViewData.js, themes/thoughtlite/index.js, components/NotionComments.js, themes/claude/index.js, themes/proxio/style.js (+31 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2 — If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 7 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: themes/proxio/index.js, themes/landing/components/Newsletter.js, themes/fukasawa/components/MailChimpForm.js, themes/plog/components/MenuItemCollapse.js, themes/nobelium/components/MenuItemCollapse.js, themes/game/components/MenuItemCollapse.js, themes/fukasawa/components/ArticleLock.js. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #3 — If anonymized user #3 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: themes/fuwari/components/ContactCard.js, themes/fuwari/components/Toc.js, themes/fuwari/components/ArticleHeader.js. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure.
Outdated (npm): @notionhq/client package.json:73— @notionhq/client is pinned at 2.3.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 5.30.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): react-facebook package.json:93— react-facebook is pinned at 8.1.4; registry.npmjs.org publishes 11.0.2 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Unused export 'default' lib/utils/lang.js:27— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
Unused export 'default' lib/utils/validation.js:380— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
C2 · Access Controls· No named authorization policies · ×1
No named authorization policies REDACTED:93— Authorization IS enforced here (by route guards, auth middleware or checks that refuse a caller) — this is NOT a claim that endpoints are unprotected. What's missing is a NAMED rule set: who may do what is encoded inline where it is checked, so the rules can't be listed, reviewed or tested apart from the code that applies them. Recommendation, not a defect.
D16 · Bus Factor· Further sole-owners (lower concentration) · ×1
Further sole-owners (lower concentration) — 7 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold — folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (58 single-owned of 472 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 472 of the 1251 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #4 (2 file(s)), anonymized user #5 (2 file(s)), anonymized user #6 (1 file(s)), anonymized user #7 (1 file(s)), anonymized user #8 (1 file(s)), anonymized user #9 (1 file(s)) (+1 more) — spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above. The files folded here: themes/typography/index.js, themes/typography/components/BlogItem.js, tools/notionnext-content-mcp/server.js, pages/api/rss.js, public/js/flutteringRibbon.js, themes/matery/components/ReadingHome.js, themes/xuhome/components/MenuItemDrop.js, themes/fuwari/components/SearchInput.js (+1 more).
D26 · Project Cohesion· Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `(repository root)` (111863 LoC, 1274 module-visible types across 109 directories). Review these for cohesion — draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers.
D28 · Secrets (history)· Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Further orphaned files (smaller) · ×1
Further orphaned files (smaller) — 152 smaller file(s) also have no living knowledge — folded into the freshness score and metrics rather than raised one row each — most significant first: themes/photo/index.js, lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js, themes/starter/components/svg/SVGFooterCircleBG.js, themes/typography/index.js, themes/starter/components/SignUpForm.js, themes/starter/components/svg/SVGAvatarBG.js, themes/nobelium/index.js, themes/simple/index.js (and 144 more) (156 orphaned of 472 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated, example/demo and scaffolding-template trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 472 of the 1251 production source files in this repository met that bar). Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway.
No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
Unused export 'event' lib/plugins/gtag.js:10— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'shouldRefreshContributionDailyCache' · ×1
Unused export 'shouldRefreshContributionDailyCache' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:104— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'setContributionEventsToLocalCache' · ×1
Unused export 'setContributionEventsToLocalCache' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:116— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'getContributionEventsFromLocalCache' · ×1
Unused export 'getContributionEventsFromLocalCache' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:125— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'filterContributionEventsUntilYesterday' · ×1
Unused export 'filterContributionEventsUntilYesterday' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:142— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'isContributionStoreEnabled' · ×1
Unused export 'isContributionStoreEnabled' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:221— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'buildContributionPostSnapshot' · ×1
Unused export 'buildContributionPostSnapshot' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:225— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'upsertContributionEvents' · ×1
Unused export 'upsertContributionEvents' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:335— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'syncContributionSnapshots' · ×1
Unused export 'syncContributionSnapshots' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:362— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'listContributionEvents' · ×1
Unused export 'listContributionEvents' lib/server/claude/contributionStore.js:475— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'ValidationError' · ×1
Unused export 'ValidationError' lib/utils/errorHandler.js:53— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'setupGlobalErrorHandling' · ×1
Unused export 'setupGlobalErrorHandling' lib/utils/errorHandler.js:154— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'getPasswordStoragePath' · ×1
Unused export 'getPasswordStoragePath' lib/utils/password.js:19— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'getPasswordQuery' · ×1
Unused export 'getPasswordQuery' lib/utils/password.js:40— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
R7 · Dead Code· Unused export 'getThemeSidebarItems' · ×1
Unused export 'getThemeSidebarItems' scripts/lib/builtin-themes.mjs:41— Nothing imports this binding — it is safe to review for removal.
X2 · Cancellation propagation· Not all async functions that make a request accept an AbortSignal · ×1
Not all async functions that make a request accept an AbortSignal — Only 1/14 async functions that make a cancellable request (fetch, axios, ky, ofetch) accept an AbortSignal or pass one on, so a request keeps running after whatever wanted it has given up — a page navigated away from, an unmounted component, a timed-out job. Take a `signal` (or an options object that carries one) and hand it to the request; where nothing could ever cancel the call, omitting it is a deliberate choice — judge against how the function is used.
X5 · Nullable reference types· Strict null checking is not enabled everywhere the repository type-checks · ×1
Strict null checking is not enabled everywhere the repository type-checks — 0/2 of this repository's type-checking configuration(s) turn on strict null checking (`"strict": true`, or `"strictNullChecks": true`). A configuration that states neither is counted as OFF, because off is tsc's own default; a solution-style one whose `"files"` is empty and whose `"references"` point at other projects is in neither number, because it checks no source itself. Where it is off, `string` admits `null` and `undefined`: passing a value that is null compiles silently and throws on the first property access.
Null assertions (`!`) reduce the strict null checking score — ~0.4 `!` null assertions per 1k TypeScript source lines — 1 assertion(s) across the 2271 source line(s) of the 25 TypeScript file(s) read, which is the only code the operator asserts anything in (a `!` in a `.js` file is not this operator and was not counted, and one in a file whose null checking is off silences nothing). Densest: lib/db/notion/RateLimiter.ts (1). Each one tells the compiler to trust the author about null, suppressing the very diagnostic `strictNullChecks` exists to produce.
Silent fallback default in catch lib/utils/validation.js:251— `sanitizeUrl` swallows every exception into `return ''` — a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the failure or let it raise. If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment on the handler or in the docstring, and the row stops firing.
Outdated (npm): @clerk/localizations — @clerk/localizations is pinned at 3.37.9; registry.npmjs.org publishes 4.24.3 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @clerk/nextjs — @clerk/nextjs is pinned at 5.7.6; registry.npmjs.org publishes 7.9.22 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @headlessui/react — @headlessui/react is pinned at 1.7.19; registry.npmjs.org publishes 2.2.10 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @next/bundle-analyzer — @next/bundle-analyzer is pinned at 15.5.28; registry.npmjs.org publishes 16.4.3 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @tabler/icons-react — @tabler/icons-react is pinned at 3.49.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 3.50.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @vercel/analytics — @vercel/analytics is pinned at 1.6.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 2.0.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): @vercel/functions — @vercel/functions is pinned at 3.10.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 3.10.5 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): algoliasearch — algoliasearch is pinned at 4.25.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 5.61.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): axios — axios is pinned at 1.20.0; registry.npmjs.org publishes 1.21.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): critters — critters is pinned at 0.0.23; registry.npmjs.org publishes 0.0.25 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): feed — feed is pinned at 4.2.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 6.0.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): ioredis — ioredis is pinned at 5.11.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 6.0.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): js-sha256 — js-sha256 is pinned at 0.11.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 1.0.0 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): next — next is pinned at 15.5.28; registry.npmjs.org publishes 16.4.3 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): notion-client — notion-client is pinned at 7.12.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.8 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): notion-utils — notion-utils is pinned at 7.12.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.8 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): react — react is pinned at 18.3.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 19.3.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): react-dom — react-dom is pinned at 18.3.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 19.3.1 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): react-hotkeys-hook — react-hotkeys-hook is pinned at 4.6.2; registry.npmjs.org publishes 5.3.3 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Outdated (npm): react-notion-x — react-notion-x is pinned at 7.12.1; registry.npmjs.org publishes 8.0.8 as the latest release. Upgrading is a judgement call — read that package's changelog for what changed between the two — but a direct production dependency several releases behind is where security and compatibility debt accumulates silently.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. semgrep could not parse 2 file(s) — `public/js/lenis.js`, `scripts/migrate-legacy-docs.mjs` — so the PII/GDPR sweep did not cover the unparsed regions of them; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a18a5e-b4d0-7c92-8953-37e6830ec50f · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 145 · Warnings: 801 · Recommendations: 276 · Info: 20 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 30-10-2026 @ 01:13 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.