{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D10","name":"Test Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D10"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NextEventViewModel.init (cyclomatic 59): NextEventViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbcf6707d29216402325c88a4d05de9050f12cc64e3b73652a02deade32ea849"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventViewModel.init (cyclomatic 46): EventViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b904e8ffda43f92bc28ca1b01b105d723ce789649eab98392df0461b792ef9f7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CalendarViewModel.init (cyclomatic 35): CalendarViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5823296574041ae2a3fcd3ee42e3376495a49387979c1a0a25e32b83e847a44d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StatusItemViewModel.init (cyclomatic 31): StatusItemViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6f0e52bf7fa37ff9da2695134e5354b1effc4acab10151ad8a4e617b54d084b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventEditorViewModel.parseTitleInstructionsAsync (cyclomatic 27): EventEditorViewModel.parseTitleInstructionsAsync has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b638e9d5e17dc0c88252c13a9f7a5ddbca718ae5d3c957ae93f1cfb03520977"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SyncLocalizations.main (cyclomatic 24): SyncLocalizations.main has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 3 of the 24 points are its own statements and the rest belongs to 4 function items inside it that branch (syncLocalizations, parseLocalizationFile, getSupportedLanguages, \u2026). Those helpers are already separate functions, so extracting the branching again is not available. To reduce it, move them out of the body to the enclosing scope, where each is measured, reviewed and tested on its own, and reduce whichever one then reads as the largest."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Tools/SyncLocalizations.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ee4070b7e71ed797d1de5df31707ee3c860d25ba054d5af53c0ff5fac60c3c9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventDetailsViewModel.init (cyclomatic 24): EventDetailsViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). Of this number, 23 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66454beae886a1c0d45ecbe109b33e5e291ce07bb3e9db9425e930f64caefcd9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventListViewModel.init (cyclomatic 24): EventListViewModel.init has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a50689055d14fdf4057f22f9b10f283753ddca7806c268b6c908edcb67894f4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.timeMatches (cyclomatic 24): EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.timeMatches has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b453794c73482fa3467ed78a3e2088095f34e581240c8e6d23aab5ca7f7f7a9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.dateMatches (cyclomatic 19): EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.dateMatches has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"00386528deb0970ec816208b76d773a816a5b26bcc27904a0fac8d71d9df7be5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.timeMatches (cyclomatic 19): EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.timeMatches has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1e336a578bc0bd877250ba26b67895399be7d4c029a9670c3fbb5d33193a660"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.dateMatches (cyclomatic 18): EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.dateMatches has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"679eeeaff70ec9b86ace6da420d23987970edeaa098d8881e58ac83e3117ea55"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UniversalEventTitleParser.instructions (cyclomatic 17): UniversalEventTitleParser.instructions has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BUniversal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a7580a7fbc9d9b26aa89af2a6c4611c89c21237160290032e965dbcc863c0f1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventEditorViewModel.applyParsedDateAndTime (cyclomatic 16): EventEditorViewModel.applyParsedDateAndTime has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dbb3d0280b524514136d507ad88c5483ca3fb6d0fd8203476d94016e14e25d31"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NextEventViewModel.init (cognitive 63): NextEventViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 63 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 29, boolean chains 26, ternaries 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa8312b6e7ebb1635b84d4993b65b8892409480393e00c5b373d43d203de2a84"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventViewModel.init (cognitive 53): EventViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (26 pts), boolean chains 20, ternaries 5 (6 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 3). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"309fd6b579ee6f9d1d5c0dac74db01843fe84d6e31a039b297bd2fc753716668"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UniversalEventTitleParser.instructions (cognitive 42): UniversalEventTitleParser.instructions has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (30 pts), boolean chains 5, match/switch 1 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 27). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BUniversal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ce6e842f7fa803868b8c1c8b6e02690e406b753cbb1876e6b6d05491771df5e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CalendarViewModel.init (cognitive 35): CalendarViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 15, if/else 15, ternaries 5. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"072a548bfdd8f21b35e2ff510463601cea07150981130923fb275b9057a908f8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StatusItemViewModel.init (cognitive 33): StatusItemViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (17 pts), boolean chains 9, ternaries 4 (5 pts), loops 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f404233bb10ff39f00ece685adcec9848413be0a19d21efc616f7dd0287f95ed"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventEditorViewModel.applyParsedDateAndTime (cognitive 29): EventEditorViewModel.applyParsedDateAndTime has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (26 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":319}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21479bc99bb9de37e307dc90e0a78cad18b47bdcf18b86f51fb27c62dd03596e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.timeMatches (cognitive 28): EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.timeMatches has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 12, if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 5 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8a7639800b631a2e5d59d58fb6d8372b609a57d8d392f87c3a8ef0aca1978901"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventDetailsViewModel.init (cognitive 26): EventDetailsViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (14 pts), boolean chains 6, ternaries 4, error handling 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 3). Of this number, 25 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 1 belongs to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8893807ec2e8d537dd04fa754a86927aea926d64f72b3409de2827e20648dcd5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.dateMatches (cognitive 26): EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.dateMatches has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 3 (8 pts), loops 5 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"695ad075efece2f029ffa30cb7eaf7e7728a3e41a00b1c84d47ceffc7a96d257"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventEditorViewModel.parseTitleInstructionsAsync (cognitive 24): EventEditorViewModel.parseTitleInstructionsAsync has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (15 pts), boolean chains 8, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40670cb9ecc8ce2a272a2796bb1199e7bfde7f0371170d4d6b1b6fa45ec8301a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventListViewModel.init (cognitive 23): EventListViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 11, if/else 9, ternaries 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efa8fd9f59364ca5e4dbf8c041ce3bfb7e9fcadf2ced0a509d7889f6e8d55284"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.dateMatches (cognitive 23): EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift.dateMatches has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 3 (7 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93a61a70ec6664eecba7dde52d47bfe8ab93f4a23edf37e670c0a2a2ab7ace01"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inspect.swift.inspect (cognitive 22): Inspect.swift.inspect has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), loops 4 (10 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Utils/Inspect.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a915869185eda7284436eb295aac3609ca4c92a13c351e8fa1ce052ec3516f0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.timeMatches (cognitive 22): EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift.timeMatches has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, if/else 4 (8 pts), loops 4 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift"},"region":{"startLine":180}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"435fd7830eafc95f07967de816926d59ceb4d255b112de2b47309928b3479356"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SyncLocalizations.main::syncLocalizations (cognitive 19): SyncLocalizations.main::syncLocalizations has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (9 pts), loops 4 (7 pts), ternaries 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Tools/SyncLocalizations.swift"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2e0879bb8a030658bc6e34120aca2b78ebb6e15fa9d34f5da96ea67715fb7a4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DateSearchParser.swift.searchMatchMonth (cognitive 19): DateSearchParser.swift.searchMatchMonth has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (13 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Utils/DateSearchParser.swift"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"757ffb550bcf2902d7d0b66a6d539d70b2bc24d4d94332cda87c5e2cd52feca7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WeatherServiceProvider.weather (cognitive 18): WeatherServiceProvider.weather has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/WeatherServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"421235af668924927c1fe48137eebe768346fbd22a1687bd0a83ccf99ad3c049"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SettingsViewModel.init (cognitive 17): SettingsViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (8 pts), boolean chains 6, loops 1, match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":293}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afcd1c1f2e74554d3312b3e86a81b711b8508ea340a1ecf7ae7bfccaf2442fe7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"WorkspaceServiceProviding.open (cognitive 16): WorkspaceServiceProviding.open has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/WorkspaceServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96e72d38b3cfdcb709edf56414504d56abf4266627f10d76c8ea6135ee8bb2a1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EventOptionsViewModel.init (cognitive 16): EventOptionsViewModel.init has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (13 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/ContextMenu/EventOptionsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81fb71e4d042e1d929b4352be79bf0ced5924ca8686b3238d6bd3280bffda4a9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CalendarViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 292 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 192 over it, 2.92\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3733dba7f696e07e754dc347ae165640c156263e0b4702fab7e966b135a3cddc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: NextEventViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 253 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 153 over it, 2.53\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2102b7ee0a0b741df8d33fc203ba48a7d23217ae4ed6c93832a9227926dfe858"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SettingsViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 222 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 122 over it, 2.22\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":293}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd2e284f00cc6ce9863af64ec0549cefa973f17d7d44d8ba357e0fc9a3f6d623"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: MainViewController: ClassTooLong \u2014 726 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 38 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 326 over it, 1.82\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ebc853be2196d16d45b1405102021909b2597f77e1abf62fcf3125ef6e58185"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EventViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b154c1bc482fa3ee5981c44d11909a05b8884824c1c0a35bf7586362f99b459"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: MainViewController.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 165 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 65 over it, 1.65\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2fe28c534fa9519b01b810c847a636379bd7d7b16e6100161424a10e2dedc33"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: StatusItemViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 162 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.62\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f1847e368c40f168b81e4447692f089da2b616677622b15daa7ebee3e7d6802b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Main/MainViewController.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 758 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 96% of them inside a single declaration: MainViewController (13-1126). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 258 over it, 1.52\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa902e570bf7f275090e8716baacfe97a0dec336f686beed5dfa47ae2e4c498c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: MainViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 150 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 50 over it, 1.50\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f849aa035da44411974a71cfcfff2b09a29802cc0a0091f94d1768c543f9bbaf"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EventListViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 146 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 46 over it, 1.46\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b53e7f4329014b9ca3c4057711cecafbac87f7840ef0459c2a17010a78b76450"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: GeneralSettingsViewController: ClassTooLong \u2014 580 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 21 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 180 over it, 1.45\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/GeneralSettingsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"37bea504bf90e23b0dd26c507d685b474efe2ffa15cce435172da2ec7f225696"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EventDetailsViewModel.init: MethodTooLong \u2014 init runs 144 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 44 over it, 1.44\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba932978fb6706a5fb7b174941be57cf1c2d015f92ae19516d194dcc13cab92c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: MainViewController: TooManyMethods \u2014 38 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 8 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ed45838ece36e5312617278e2ffcb936b6bb2a929a322cf041f89784d0e5ef7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EventDetailsViewController: ClassTooLong \u2014 488 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 36 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 88 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"55fd989edf905bcd24e4557093b228cd3addb378f1d8878ba99177c3eb0ca484"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: EventDetailsViewController: TooManyMethods \u2014 36 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 6 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d588fb7541d45dca4526e8a003506ef710d72670a38316a1f4d37e4b075e6453"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EventEditorViewModel: ClassTooLong \u2014 471 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 28 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 71 over it, 1.18\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4e6f73eb73e9a5319f1349add1f30228d56a3fa48acff246d6fb18113915762"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Settings/GeneralSettingsViewController.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 582 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 100% of them inside a single declaration: GeneralSettingsViewController (11-849). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 82 over it, 1.16\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/GeneralSettingsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20af87353aeaaed8c07619545268686af5604e289277a9ba04c5052e1448b37c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 517 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 91% of them inside a single declaration: EventEditorViewModel (13-683). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2adfabbf5f4ba58343c3675121b6e1c3c5629c8855154f24e7d5f4391e8e7c81"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 517 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"157f7827c4832d2ab958f2c10df7d600b9f764cc6a7a6fe5967176ca1804b31e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CalendarView.setUpGridBindings: MethodTooLong \u2014 setUpGridBindings runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Calendar/CalendarView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"497ffeeaa23c253f4f498de7b2f04a1ba3f30f423b657052e095047cd8db3b55"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SyncLocalizations.main: MethodTooLong \u2014 main runs 103 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Tools/SyncLocalizations.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41e82940425535f8f537f413982fb3fb0a6a1aa7ce8793b8cdf9bc4125b147f3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: EventDetails/EventDetailsViewController.swift: FileTooLong \u2014 503 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 97% of them inside a single declaration: EventDetailsViewController (13-761). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 3 over it, 1.01\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d56433ce793447a48126318e67b46acd6beb7ffb35ba135de6b23efb4ebdd86a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:335-357 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:359-381 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:242-264 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:266-288 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"746f56d3c50537e819087416fe33fd91c48d6ca9e77ab59546e6275596ab3911"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:23-55 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:57-87 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:89-114 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:116-141 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdeecb62f70395442690141cbc9824ede924083a06677a9af13d2ba928fa01c5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift:115-134 | Calendr/Editors/ReminderEditorViewController.swift:73-92 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift:115\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":115}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2aabdc92534e29deb5c742af8655d976880bb45a225e9b41f28c55fda097445"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 4): Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:36-51 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:68-83 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:96-111 | Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:123-138 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:36\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:52\u0060 calls \u0060height\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift:113\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"196582a0a55f0ad6da4beb88b73f7c2f4f9979a8a6d63209f9ae2c8af405d9c2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift:233-247 | Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift:251-265 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift:233\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":233}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6861c927b7dc2abd0b8eaca98a7aac8ebc5a4f18917562e49f5614fe7788f648"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift:532-545 | Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift:604-617 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift:532\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":532}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b30123c1412a60650443960b79d645d1312681717f411456f8e1aab3d0b7df9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:268-281 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:190-203 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:268\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":268}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e24d8bd3f7b6d2c68bd01990b8ca95ee52bd4f17e9b7a0bc1cfb44f41fa9ada"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift:67-80 | Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift:62-75 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift:67\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2f5600c24bd9006030cd9722fb50b82abee9b272aebaa7c20abe15cee51cfba"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift:308-321 | Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift:400-413 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift:308\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59ade3acffa8d01bb0699fac847c2f21f9c70db8705b29244fa0f82f7bf3da85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift:94-106 | Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift:77-90 | Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift:95-108 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift:94\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b363e92d837c8b09e534e4cd6c33f5635e9fc3be517d18485c1ce279a469802"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:10-22 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:10-20 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:10\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6766b639dda2f203831918c97ac54fe3ae536351635223c2dd58b0fbafc68c8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:40-52 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:22-34 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:40\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The \u0060return\u0060 at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body\u0027s own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that \u0060return\u0060 occupied \u2014 no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ddf8853d32c052914d4a3e42fd12a6fd684214d2db9330e67f7f6486a9659683"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:345-357 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:252-264 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:345\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f9c06bf66cb7aad74ed1f22cd2a60a5b703ef6ebac7066d944c2c820669c4ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:369-381 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:276-288 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:369\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":369}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c32dfa5e96665691c7e1fbafcc29b9c1d92ffd19e36f56e617bf4ec2cf4ce5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift:47-58 | Calendr/Components/Label.swift:67-78 | Calendr/Components/TitleButton.swift:47-58 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Components/TitleButton.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a8582627c3de62602d22410a6732c5db9e3e83fc998375aab045d6df4c6d4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift:50-61 | Calendr/Editors/ReminderEditorViewController.swift:45-56 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift:50\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"921c2d7eb71ee01219005603c462d561740acd5846338857103d13bc0b031295"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:174-185 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:97-108 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:174\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a45babd0022d2ce004b273723c75da15fff50907c8cefeff8085d1d05fc9663f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:296-307 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:205-216 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:296\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":296}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45ff127e5c53c4d18ee4bb6a0d6d2712eec5bb066cc7d515cd9d435f7ff1ca1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:280-290 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:293-303 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:202-212 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:280\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ff1fc14200629fda26bce49468f094132172fc77e073fc9a621b49a17232f4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:324-333 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:231-240 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:324\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":324}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edb00151620c05ffb84887c13477100df43a6241c3929d2cb91db7b3bf40056f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift:729-736 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParsing.swift:206-214 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift:729\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":729}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"105d7836e342ba0eee1f4ce7944c9de230a86eb2e0ff92826f94537776c0eb15"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:335-343 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:242-250 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:335\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da5a5b847e70b43c71d5e5e4e550e550d7ce4707f21bb0f93f380afc233efe32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:359-367 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:266-274 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:359\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5cdaa13efed547590309324bc68db590b5d7470c32baee51590df05b5384e439"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift:453-461 | Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift:264-272 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift:453\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":453}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72b301f0d10007c5249cfd0b4bbc471dc4058b8dd230bee00e7a0362973eb499"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Settings/BrowserPickerViewModel.swift:37-45 | Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift:520-528 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Settings/BrowserPickerViewModel.swift:37\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/BrowserPickerViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4885a5e681bbc0246964330cd8ad3d5bc5726f5c7b7f3fe350f1ea9dd56c990e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:306-313 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:215-222 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:228-235 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":306}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e6209f0f59ddd4f0aa1ac00d5dac3e43f610bc282d8db88c1ad0056c14a5999"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:389-396 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:296-303 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:389\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":389}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a28bec6e3e98c0bcb5c99fa4577d9b7b1090c4a350531cc9136e22520330760"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:345-351 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:369-375 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:252-258 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:276-282 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":345}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14d8a91aa69ba03966b34ef01f8c75cc40d6d52c2887fb1b91e2a6884bf76331"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift:326-332 | Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift:374-380 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift:326\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7183a257f421d5ff0d18fade011bb877b3010a0cbe1820c6615fb155bf3bad41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:308-313 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:323-328 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:217-222 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:230-235 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"feac9c44cd2d9134f5468815b8a6d9e81b2baf3af8b39f270037cbffb4957a41"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:210-214 | Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift:138-142 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BEnglish.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 16 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 163 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift:210\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BCzech.swift"},"region":{"startLine":210}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0be17d889ffa99ca832e2f73015bca89f4bdf61013648106bb0c2eb212fbc5a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Components/Checkbox.swift:44-55 | Calendr/Components/Radio.swift:36-47 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Components/Checkbox.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c12af6c3524be846013b880b86b1da8cead43c71e3e95703a405c63694cc47d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift:29-36 | Calendr/Components/TitleButton.swift:29-36 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Components/TitleButton.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Components/Dropdown.swift"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf20e811a7978b20f1c7a5bc9ec3bf9d28b2a83e75d8b055e0d52b82649fc165"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MockCalendarServiceProvider (LCOM4 9): MockCalendarServiceProvider\u0027s methods fall into 9 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 9 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/MockCalendarServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ecdaca61d738f9cfead16c5f47888e1dc3a83d07538960dee23227c2e008e68"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MockFileProvider (LCOM4 7): MockFileProvider\u0027s methods fall into 7 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 7 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/MockFileProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99aebece91ffaf93b9eb9f5b7df47c20b39294f252484e0efd85d93200b8b449"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: SettingsViewController (LCOM4 7): SettingsViewController\u0027s methods fall into 7 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 7 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f68fd5c6e6dcfc5fd841b454e783fdfe120e136739a22859b1f241792f95dded"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Collection (LCOM4 6): Collection\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Extensions/Collection.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"689977e3b0f587024f03ea2265de5490d4cc4ac7b70d46fa0705a14daa95c762"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: FileProvider (LCOM4 5): FileProvider\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/FileProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24d1afcfff06f246f2edce8282a018fe561132b11c61f7452dde6627f50f66b7"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: EventDetailsViewController (LCOM4 5): EventDetailsViewController\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93ba3d854d5bf609ca7be463ebf5d31101480d2a7dc02a499a57a74e7a182d46"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: HostingWindowController (LCOM4 4): HostingWindowController\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Components/HostingWindowController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8d2a889cce9c84075a19af9fc2851297413539f14ee7fc15628b00e2eee640d"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MockLocalNotificationProvider (LCOM4 4): MockLocalNotificationProvider\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/MockLocalNotificationProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59989933f8b7f92857956bba9ef46e4c13cb0a4eebfd3d732425e5bbbfaa3099"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MockWorkspaceServiceProvider (LCOM4 4): MockWorkspaceServiceProvider\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/MockWorkspaceServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61fb0524dc6681de42fd40be396e9775439a4b9fbbf7f833eff80975c77522bd"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Reactive (LCOM4 4): Reactive\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Extensions/NSControl\u002BRx.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"185d3c41194d84df3a3e681b9086993018bc220fb26c39745e81dcefc6ae9c3b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNotificationTap_mapsNewVersion_default: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa85ae63c4b652b4f3364cf3c992449edb961cf35c1e189f23131ab87b22c1f5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNotificationTap_withNewVersionCategory_install: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8405a720f69c0b0b91120a38e5f666dea8dcb5bd2abe901663da5244950963a5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNotificationTap_withUpdatedCategory_shouldTriggerDefaultAction: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f812222e636e7dcd544602a76c83db41fd6aa419df169a0adfe6ad62d989c65"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNotificationTap_mapsNewVersion_unknownActionId: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f71b69678823fe14692b586e01775fb71ea322ddf92ccd76eae000ccc674fc7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testInitialStatus: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb9fa840f6806813712e918d92e57e7909a4a3b5cfb3fc3407f0c8c1da73a207"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testCheckRelease_authorizationDenied_shouldNotFetch: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82111b997c30da1c92a4bb48bd3e70199c1c470e1ef3c5e17708daafc146a96c"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testCheckRelease_emptyResponse_reportsError: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be3b002d6f9520dc005e7657a1400dfe0c7f44958bb248972b64f6d21543f2fc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testCheckRelease_htmlResponse_reportsError: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eb0af851986819e5a5cc88cb6f526b460fadfd2a7b8302080a7749bd34422f3"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testDownloadAndInstall_setsDownloadingStatus: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":427}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64988f34767e825f14c01ab2bb1d30b9bc964f52fe7c5ad98c1d546e395a8b6f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testInit_withoutUpdatedVersion_shouldNotSendNotification: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/AutoUpdaterTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":785}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db8f79456a2c64fda1f14a939511e08d8805ba97eed24fe6c07acd093bc4e949"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventsPerDate: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":468}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fcb2c54fb68cd685a2740054882347ea3ef5671a37ecf36363d2b6e7ab3a87d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventsPerDate_withAllDayEventsDisabled_shouldNotShowAllDayEvents: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":480}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d1f1a42887cb98a55d3e62680f5f52ee430dd5655e6b5ea82d7d12d9c176f2a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withAllDayEventsDisabled_shouldNotShowAllDayDots: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":493}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16ca85d5a5df13edaa6cbae56aad47b1e62f330e3e13872e5b7a767b4452b897"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventsPerDate_withDeclinedEvents: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":506}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07126713bb7125ca789d780772f828e647777a097c69962e3c10beffe9d0918e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventsPerDate_withFutureEvents_shouldOnlyShowFutureEventsInCurrentDate: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":519}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"754693e42d1e19ed966b8a128e7693aea628ccbedb83a8c203145626114067d7"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventsPerDate_withFutureEvents_withDeclinedEvents_shouldOnlyShowFutureEventsInCurrentDate: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":541}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43b134276f9e7f54c61d3a3d21125d65fab6d44262ae273160914627d5b5ee8f"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":617}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a8f51ee6fb43b37c9dbfc17d094471b1e02237bdb3aa50aee577344c08fee24e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_shouldNotShowFutureEvents: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":629}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad0fd84e76cca71de10edbc53f39f6cc2a2f3f218ac759dd52cca4a990f8a77d"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withDeclinedEvents: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":642}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c61a0ad3c4f5248a87b816f1dbe41ff872b7ed37f5f3fd8edc50d62e211d0ada"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withPendingReminder: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":655}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da4d879820408c3fe245208fe3481d3e79f10042a5a8b85bafdcbee8c6bc77af"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withCompletedReminder: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"510e73ee92c76ea67bbe4cf31b2e356a74c5505c24e97b4698046cbee84d062b"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withHiddenItems: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":697}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7fc47005e546db8a917d36c73ea0a39927d5ba75178790e6d91f3e93bf9b1d4"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withSearch: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78619b19b63eb45e4cdde7cb371997088942fb873cd0bc5ed542f767a1c33108"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withNeutralOption: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"abd2145bbd14c65275080ed67cfdf78be7a7a2537f015dd66c0bb7e350059fc5"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testEventDotsPerDate_withHighlightedOption: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/CalendarViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"34e00079d46135c3fd64de2180be5c18c772bb93bf04f33eba2f040c03bf3462"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testViewModel_saveEvent_withSuccess_shouldCloseWindow: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventEditorViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":376}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f997b2fb94c8bf0a6b278993f3d4cd9a8952f3c9f648075d64a2c564f2873fc"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testViewModel_saveEvent_withError_shouldNotCloseWindow: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventEditorViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":392}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8f45b3b4980e106ee49a99d5fdda2766b803cdbdf0fa2b02d6c054e772ea6fe"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testClose_beforeCooldown_shouldNotDismiss: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventFullScreenViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":126}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89c78d9ef9343db0ae83292d4aa6e98456f03345ba1d8882e18742e30d0c8b3e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testClose_afterCooldown_shouldDismiss: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventFullScreenViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f13aa2e575d136ac3092b818fe9c0d11fed7bdbcd5f6c004df7a0d8f45bfdf18"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testSkip_beforeCooldown_shouldNotSkip: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventFullScreenViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c597dbc5c517bf21f87ad5fae36274ad547ef3a680c0ba9522ef1c79828a20e"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testSkip_afterCooldown_shouldSkip: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventFullScreenViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c8a95de9d3738cb9307b6dd98eec5cb313202aea684501dadeabb463d9ea815"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testJoin_beforeCooldown_shouldNotJoin: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/EventFullScreenViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dd3279c6935b302a95a9975d55e01dbad731e9f009254154b9c483b13e6c4ce"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testNonExistingKey: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/KVCTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":19}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fa538f4581ef2366a66c05da2c1c4375ed48493b7a1b58a15237c5bc60c49c1"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testExistingKeyWrongType: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/KVCTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8153d1d07f891ba34ad5527498bcf59cca0ad75775d17ffead18a46b6d18c5ee"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testTermination: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/LaunchServiceProviderTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a492be711b53c5a6a7bc45d6b912d9234500361c8dde4b5ff7233ffb6594cfff"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testViewModel_saveReminder_withSuccess_shouldCloseWindow: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/ReminderEditorViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4c8d1f637dfa2d6878d21ec9cbe0f6f696148e243bdd0d1f8bce0b0d0d4bdff"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testScreenLock_thenUnlock: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/ScreenProviderTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f06b4d7d4c0f89e5f7215d8c7259d9cab674decf6f61a83ad6dc99886a009e0a"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testAutoCheckForUpdatesStart: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/SettingsViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":529}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e682ef405134af167359f0229bd6ae62ceb2bb543edce79d1633eb0a07019fb"}},{"ruleId":"D10","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No assertions: testAutoCheckForUpdatesStop: This method\u0027s body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* \u2014 so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as \u0027no assertion this check knows how to see\u0027, and if that is right, add one."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CalendrTests/SettingsViewModelTests.swift"},"region":{"startLine":545}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e95e46a3535d884ce8dce6c4b32a2f59bd49fda47845c27b42c2c37c1e40b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift: Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift changed 11 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 59 in NextEventViewModel.init at line 80. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 10 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":80}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59d64d6fe82ea90ae3cc466f233e6c035e9a92d25148bc138f36e74e691d978e"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift: Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 35 in CalendarViewModel.init at line 27. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Calendar/CalendarViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2116428fcd2974a9ecbb53731f7a309edba87f4da65b8176a5c57583fd27a1af"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift: Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift changed 7 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 27 in EventEditorViewModel.parseTitleInstructionsAsync at line 246. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventEditorViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":246}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"679f6e8abb9c525cc8bf8a02e13787d1c419c2da8df756b18e6e634d4bcefce9"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift: Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 46 in EventViewModel.init at line 62. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56e49bbe18dee60c17760db7bf973f4e06727533b5bba140db9e9971c02906f7"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift: Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift changed 11 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in SettingsViewModel.init at line 293. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":293}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"800616dca2081e4af3fd05eeb481dd88d18ae5dc47bbcd88b1ac024bc7fab6be"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift: Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in EventDetailsViewModel.init at line 67. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62570f879a7a6ffa6454193ea436bef76a72bb81f1e9149448ba17c77ca97512"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift: Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 24 in EventListViewModel.init at line 77. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 2 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9962d7347edf87ce62d3efa70b00659fbc16d9f0642a4e3aacef79edb8639de9"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift: Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift changed 2 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 31 in StatusItemViewModel.init at line 39. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-21..2026-10-19, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-21 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-19 22:40:25 \u002B01:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/StatusItemViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"18dab9a645f65dc2d951ac8c717529ce24dd66eac1a86731fd8839ff08829ab7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HackComment: // hack to hide the icon \u2014 a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/BrowserPicker.swift"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7ee2517ac6932d0e19223b95eed50d9cdb1f43786e9ce8af0e3c4e06b05fc0f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: For some reason, dropdowns don\u0027t work when presented from a popover \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/CalendarListViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4bf1dd60dfff1768be95bf96e2aecf6074f85217a11d1ad52b030718193eea6"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (21694 LoC, 469 module-visible types across 27 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f9b238b8a9443531789ed5671d5b18d1acf6c16227134ba1d281108c1b8479b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16baa82dced408d8f49ff54acdf1a5121fa826c3732e6800ab79ad56fd1448d2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"682aff863b315430054c58eb64449f7fac718c10d4ef0da63110d8093aa6ba7d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef92eb27fdc393195110357903be723265cb529ff4a3b8b367ecd44f9dafa945"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b227819fe326a6f3713aafc9508feacc4d8cb713ee38d8dcc4b920d3929d8d83"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8820ea123a859f3f325912f60a0545a931017499eaf7f9e45f6b94eb5326f811"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: EventViewModel.swift \u2192 EventOptionsViewModel.swift, EventModel\u002BFactory.swift, EventDetailsPreview.swift, EventListViewPreview.swift, NextEventPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift\u0060 changes together with 5 other files \u2014 \u0060Calendr/Events/ContextMenu/EventOptionsViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Mocks/Factories/EventModel\u002BFactory.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventListViewPreview.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/NextEventPreview.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 5 separate couplings, not 5 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 5."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5d73e56a88b841f2a2750c379fd47d057ddd388cadc67bbb1c9a3d17c4d2823"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: NextEventViewModel.swift \u2194 EventDetailsPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift\u0060 change together 73% of the time (11 of the 15 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 11 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060cf77d964\u0060 Add link copy button to event details (#810); \u00603c3bfebb\u0060 Show YouTube thumbnail in event details (#787); \u006046ff67e4\u0060 Fix wrong progress source in next event details (#625) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd860d731aafe55ae9aeb6cdac775b5fc7d48911eb4cc0716045d0e841e34ee9"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: LocalStoragePrefs.swift \u2194 SettingsViewModel.swift: \u0060Calendr/Settings/LocalStoragePrefs.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Settings/SettingsViewModel.swift\u0060 change together 69% of the time (18 of the 26 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 18 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060308697b7\u0060 Adjust next event length with notch (#673); \u00606a361053\u0060 Full screen alert transparency slider (#652); \u00606738afc1\u0060 Add light/dark mode settings (#409) (at that commit the file was still \u0060Calendr/Settings/Prefs\u002BUserDefaults.swift\u0060) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Settings/LocalStoragePrefs.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6012bfc52663853ace8bedebade03c6bb74b6ccdb76fa799d1747c6578c0dcec"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: MainViewController.swift \u2192 Rx\u002BHelpers.swift, EventDetailsPreview.swift, NextEventPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift\u0060 changes together with 3 other files \u2014 \u0060Calendr/Extensions/Rx\u002BHelpers.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/NextEventPreview.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91ef5cdfb7b86558cc5965d02b60b00058db93dcff96788e34097c114f149730"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: EventViewPreview.swift \u2192 EventDetailsViewModel.swift, EventListViewModel.swift, MainViewController.swift, NextEventViewModel.swift, EventDetailsPreview.swift, EventListViewPreview.swift, NextEventPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventViewPreview.swift\u0060 changes together with 7 other files \u2014 \u0060Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventListViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Main/MainViewController.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventListViewPreview.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Previews/NextEventPreview.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 7 separate couplings, not 7 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 7."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Previews/EventViewPreview.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8675be748d3b532ced9aeed19d43b4604aedb9842d4d9f3d9ef83bf36e6fe98a"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: EventView.swift \u2194 EventModel\u002BFactory.swift: \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventView.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Mocks/Factories/EventModel\u002BFactory.swift\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060067c79ca\u0060 Show reminders url \u002B flag \u002B tags (#707); \u0060072d7366\u0060 Show reminder priority (#328); \u0060b5892846\u0060 Show both location and url in event list \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"33de3d4a5761c73bee6e943ec1a690243ec55650b702cf15e1e90c49f0cf518c"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: EventModel\u002BFactory.swift \u2194 CalendarServiceProvider.swift: \u0060Calendr/Mocks/Factories/EventModel\u002BFactory.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Providers/CalendarServiceProvider.swift\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060067c79ca\u0060 Show reminders url \u002B flag \u002B tags (#707); \u0060072d7366\u0060 Show reminder priority (#328); \u0060f3161736\u0060 Get coordinates from EKEvent if possible \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/Factories/EventModel\u002BFactory.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8de1825ae1253aad4e0d755da4d6a90a847aa866423d8e9e5e363b371ebe3f5"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: NextEventViewModel.swift \u2194 EventListViewPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventListViewPreview.swift\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060cf77d964\u0060 Add link copy button to event details (#810); \u0060fc225c7f\u0060 Fix event list automatic scroll (#792); \u00603c3bfebb\u0060 Show YouTube thumbnail in event details (#787) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1109e613645882f94bb0f10079f67214293a3f61c74a720e1a453f129a6415ce"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: EventDetailsPreview.swift \u2194 EventListViewPreview.swift: \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Previews/EventListViewPreview.swift\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package \u2014 so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060cf77d964\u0060 Add link copy button to event details (#810); \u00603c3bfebb\u0060 Show YouTube thumbnail in event details (#787); \u0060875c3ca4\u0060 Show grouped next events list (#609) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Previews/EventDetailsPreview.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fbc00cc92490a1ead5230ad1b8d9da51588745d4acd162362008fe9a5685db7"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change-coupling hub: EventOptionsViewModel.swift \u2192 ReminderOptionsViewModel.swift, EventDetailsViewModel.swift, NextEventViewModel.swift: \u0060Calendr/Events/ContextMenu/EventOptionsViewModel.swift\u0060 changes together with 3 other files \u2014 \u0060Calendr/Events/ContextMenu/ReminderOptionsViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/Events/EventDetails/EventDetailsViewModel.swift\u0060, \u0060Calendr/MenuBar/NextEventViewModel.swift\u0060 \u2014 none of which declares a dependency on it: one file is the hub of 3 separate couplings, not 3 unrelated pairs. Read the hub first: if the others each duplicate a part of what it does, the shared concern belongs in ONE unit and extracting it clears every edge at once; if the hub is a registry, dispatcher or barrel that must name each of them, the coupling is structural and the question is whether that list can be discovered instead of enumerated. Fixing the hub is one change; breaking the couplings one pair at a time is 3."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/ContextMenu/EventOptionsViewModel.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4930f56dba348e1a7f35cbd6864c00ad66f241e097e333f80c04ce57f6af40e"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: EventView.swift \u2194 EventModel.swift: \u0060Calendr/Events/EventList/EventView.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Models/EventModel.swift\u0060 change together 50% of the time (8 of the 16 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u0060067c79ca\u0060 Show reminders url \u002B flag \u002B tags (#707); \u0060072d7366\u0060 Show reminder priority (#328); \u0060e9a9513b\u0060 Show completed reminders (#250) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Events/EventList/EventView.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7e05a1f3eab9e68efe925ec9ceeb3758a2f272278f39930b6b39bb17421278e"}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: MockCalendarSettings.swift \u2194 GeneralSettingsViewController.swift: \u0060Calendr/Mocks/MockCalendarSettings.swift\u0060 and \u0060Calendr/Settings/GeneralSettingsViewController.swift\u0060 change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder \u2014 so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u00609de7fa0d\u0060 Add option to choose the native calendar view mode; \u00600fb5b5de\u0060 Hold \u2325 to peek at hovered dates; \u0060b9f6613c\u0060 In-app first weekday configuration \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Mocks/MockCalendarSettings.swift"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d349d76b194d84cb4e04206747be966dbbb51f4f083e4688d599f90dbd440ff"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07ccd2b6ef19022529045202501cc77c94fc1d100e8279477ee032fa26ebc754"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e35d8dcb33071da2eb270ed64a180656cc43fdbd25807c8850cc84ce86708218"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f1e7684f8281bd255ddef97105c7055c2ebae06964c8745716b83e174debe83"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 3897 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":".github/workflows/unit-tests.yml"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"PF3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Sync-over-async blocking: \u0060terminate\u0060 is async and calls .waitUntilExit() \u2014 a blocking call inside async code stalls the cooperative pool\u0027s thread \u2014 one per core \u2014 and every task scheduled on it for as long as it runs."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Providers/LaunchServiceProvider.swift"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c532d8a6c1e7dc545da814c7b56c90f980b8104237883b1500775ffb39219d"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060matches15\u0060 turns every thrown error into \u0060[]\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or let it propagate (\u0060throws\u0060). If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the \u0060catch\u0060, \u0060guard\u0060 or \u0060??\u0060, or in the doc comment, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Editors/EventTitleParser/EventTitleParser\u002BUniversal.swift"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a4a8850a34aa111718056aa3e786acf0a4b4210553348f3ef299689f5b7dd243"}},{"ruleId":"X7","level":"note","message":{"text":"Silent fallback default in catch: \u0060attachments\u0060 turns every thrown error into \u0060[]\u0060 \u2014 a data error becomes a silent behavior change with no trail. Log the error or let it propagate (\u0060throws\u0060). If that constant is the correct answer rather than a stand-in for a value that could not be read, say so in a comment at the \u0060catch\u0060, \u0060guard\u0060 or \u0060??\u0060, or in the doc comment, and the row stops firing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Calendr/Models/Attachment.swift"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e284d473704b981cb181afda90d358ff5a5858d9144369c234fbbeb8a4a17720"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-4","guid":"c859d8ea-8b24-a157-9406-94929c10397a","name":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)","shortDescription":{"text":"Poisoned Pipeline Execution (PPE)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-04-Poisoned-Pipeline-Execution"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":13,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}