Public report of paul1956/CSharpToVB, published 21 October 2026. It has the same score, grades and number of
findings as the full report. The details of security findings (where they are in the code, which known
vulnerabilities and which passwords or keys were found) are left out, so nobody can use them against the project.
Public
Executive reportMeasured under the Code Assurance Index, an open standard for code quality, using its published scoring rules (rubric version 2026.10.5). Watchdog signed this survey and filed it in the standard's public register, where anyone can look it up by its survey ID. Check this survey →
Signed and filed in the standard's public register, 21 October 2026, 23:55 UTC · Survey ID cd_30f3c011ceaf4bdd981e1044482803d9
paul1956/CSharpToVB
Measured 21 October 2026, 23:54 UTC, at code version 5f3b2f0
Code coverage is not measured: Suite not runnable in-image and no committed report.
Test reliability is not measured: No test run produced results.
Boundary Type-Coupling is not measured: Bounded contexts not declared.
Supply-chain provenance & signing is not measured: Supply-chain provenance is not scored (this pipeline releases no artifact), but its build steps or GitHub Actions workflows have integrity defects, or nothing watches its dependency set for published advisories.
CAI scoreAdequate
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
Down 4 since the last survey
The score is built from these lenses. Each lens grades one area of the code, such as how easy it is to change or how well it is protected. The weakest lens counts most, so one weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away.
A medium codebase: 26,511 lines of product code in 7 projects, tests not counted · Estimated rebuild effort: about 0.3 person-years · Weakest lens: Maturity, 35
Findings by how serious they are
5 critical301 serious90 minor
5 dimensions are left out of the score. For each one, Watchdog either couldn't measure it in this code, or found no evidence of the safeguard it looks for, such as a tested backup restore. They count neither for nor against the score, and Limitations lists each one with its reason.
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
21 October 2026, 23:54 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index records a number
together with the evidence it was worked out from, so anyone can recalculate it, but it doesn't certify or guarantee
the code. The standard was written by Canine Development, which also builds Watchdog. It is open to any tool that
implements it, and today Watchdog is the only one that does.
The score is deterministic, which means the same code always gets the same score. Watchdog works it out with tools that follow published rules, and an AI model never decides it, so anyone who applies the same rules to the same code gets the same number. How it is done is explained under Methodology ▸
56of 60 dimensions measured by tools. The other 4 are advisory notes from an AI model, which explain the code but don't count towards the score.
385of 396 findings point to an exact file and line, so you can open each one in the code. The other 11 concern the repository as a whole, such as missing documentation.
60dimensions across 5 lenses, read from 26,511 lines of product code in 7 projects.
paul1956/CSharpToVB scores 52 out of 100 and is rated Adequate, while four of its five lenses score higher still: Architecture at 99, rated Exemplary, and Security and Compliance at 69, Code Health at 67 and Production Readiness at 61, all rated Adequate.
The score is lower than those four because the weakest lens counts most, and here that is Maturity, which scores 35 and is rated Weak. Its Knowledge Freshness dimension scores 0 out of 10, and until that reaches 4, Maturity can't be rated higher than Adequate. The first actions are to resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality and to resolve the 76 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness, and if Maturity rose to 70, the score would rise from 52 to about 66.
Five findings are critical: three in Explicit Debt and two in Static Analysis (SAST).
Watchdog couldn't measure Dependency Hygiene, Dependency Vulnerabilities and IL Efficiency in this code, so those dimensions are left out of the score. The product code is 26,511 lines, which would take an estimated 0.3 person-years, around €43,000, to rebuild.
A lens is capped at Adequate while one of its dimensions scores below 4 out of 10, however well the rest of the lens does. That way a serious problem in one place always shows in the lens's rating.
How the score is built: what each lens counts forThe lenses don't count equally. The weakest lens counts most, the next weakest a little less, and so on, so a weak area pulls the score down instead of being averaged away. In the bar below, each part's width shows how much that lens counts and its colour shows its rating. Improving the widest part moves the score most, and as that lens improves, it counts for less, because another lens becomes the weakest.
Watchdog compares every finding with the previous survey's. A finding that has only moved to another line in the same file counts as the same finding, so only new findings appear here. Advisory notes from the AI model are left out, because the model words them afresh in every survey.
Fixed since the last survey: 4 findings
These 4 critical or serious findings were in the previous survey, on 7 October 2026, and are gone from this one.
Coupling · Off the main sequence: ProgressReportLibrary
Coupling · Off the main sequence: csvGenerator
Coupling · Off the main sequence: ObjectPoolLibrary
Supply-chain Provenance & Signing REDACTED
Rebuild cost: about €43,000 · Estimate
Cost to rebuild
€14,000 to €72,000, for 239 to 758 hours of work, about 0.3 person-years for one engineer
Difficulty of the problem
Standard, judged from the kind of software and how it is built. Code that solves a harder problem, such as payments or medical bookings, costs more per line to write.
Quality factor
×0.7 at a score of 52. Better code takes more work to write, so the factor is ×1.0 at a score of 70, lower below it and higher above it.
Size
Medium: 26,511 lines of product code
Comment lines
The estimate prices 26,453 lines. Comment lines count towards the size of 26,511 lines but aren't priced as work.
How the estimate is made: Watchdog prices the hours a team would need to write this code again, at €60 to €95 an hour. Declarations and boilerplate are priced at a fast rate and logic at a slower one, and the logic is then multiplied by the difficulty of the problem and by the quality factor. The estimate can be about 30% off either way, and it moves most with the hourly rate and the difficulty.
Top priorities
The three actions that raise the score most for the work they take. The full ranked list is in the Roadmap.
1
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Raises the score by about 12 points · Low effort · ADR Quality
2
Resolve the 76 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with NodesVisitor.vb, TextFieldParser.vb, NamespaceVisitor.vb.
Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Each conclusion below combines several dimensions into one point that no single dimension shows, and lists the measurements it rests on.
Where the investment is most exposed · Value at risk
This code would cost about €43,000 to build again, about 0.3 person-years of work. Its weakest lens is Maturity, at 35 (Weak). Maturity is about how well the project explains and looks after itself, which decides whether a new developer, or a new supplier, can take over. Because the weakest lens counts most in the score, work on Maturity also moves the score most.
Based on: the rebuild estimate · the Maturity grade · how much each lens counts
What to do: Start with the Maturity actions in Top priorities.
If you do one thing first · First action
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality. Of all the actions in this report, it raises the score most for the work it takes: about 12 points for low effort, because it clears the 1 ADR Quality findings. The next survey will show the change in the score.
Based on: the ranked actions in Top priorities, by score gain and effort
What hard-to-read code costs each year · Cost
Four dimensions measure how easy the code is to work in: two measure how tangled its logic is, one how much of it is copied, and one how well each part sticks to a single job. In this codebase they average 5.7 out of 10. Code at that level is slower to change than clean code, and Watchdog estimates the extra work at 6% to 13% on every change. The history of the code shows how much it changes: about 1,481 lines over the last 90 days, which is about 6,006 lines a year. At that pace, the extra work comes to an estimated 0.9 to 5.2 engineer-days a year, and it grows as more code changes.
How this is estimated: The number of changed lines is measured from the history of the code. The rest rests on two assumptions of Watchdog's own: code scoring 8 out of 10 or more adds no extra work, and each point below 8 adds 2.5% to 5.6% to every change; and an engineer changes 150 to 400 lines in a day. The result is a range for planning, not a measurement.
Based on: Cyclomatic Complexity · Cognitive Complexity · Code Duplication · Cohesion (LCOM4) · the code's change history
What to do: Start with the files listed under Churn × Complexity Hotspots, which change often and are hard to read, because that is where the extra work is paid most often.
Architecture — module dependency graph
Project dependencies, layered top-to-bottom; arrows show direction. Any dashed red edge points upward or sideways — a layering smell or cycle. A clean layered graph has none.
Architecture: which parts of the code depend on which
The code is divided into modules, groups of code that each handle one part of the product, and a module depends on another when it uses code from it. The table lists the modules both down the side and across the top, in an order where each module should only use modules listed above it. A number in a cell means the module on that row uses the module in that column, and it counts the pairs of building blocks (types) that connect them. The one thing to look for is a mark above the diagonal line. It means two or more modules use each other in a loop (a dependency cycle), so none of them can be changed, tested or released on its own.
12 modules, with 6 dependencies between them. One loop runs through 2 of the modules, marked above the diagonal.
Which modules use which. The module on each row uses the module in each column, and the number counts the pairs of types that connect them. A cell above the diagonal is part of a loop.
CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors uses (global), so a change to (global) can break CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors, while a change to CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors can't break (global).
Position
Above the diagonal, so it is part of a loop. Neither module can be changed, tested or released on its own until one of these dependencies is removed.
(global) uses ProgressReportLibrary, so a change to ProgressReportLibrary can break (global), while a change to (global) can't break ProgressReportLibrary.
Position
Below the diagonal: (global) uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
(global) uses CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors, so a change to CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors can break (global), while a change to (global) can't break CSharpToVBConverter.CSharpToVBVisitors.
Position
Below the diagonal: (global) uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
CSharpToVBApp uses ProgressReportLibrary, so a change to ProgressReportLibrary can break CSharpToVBApp, while a change to CSharpToVBApp can't break ProgressReportLibrary.
Position
Below the diagonal: CSharpToVBApp uses a module listed above it, which is the healthy direction.
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A05:2025 — Injection
5
High / Critical
Roadmap
Begin by resolving the 76 orphaned files in the Knowledge Freshness dimension, prioritizing NodesVisitor.vb, TextFieldParser.vb, and NamespaceVisitor.vb. Next, establish architectural clarity by documenting significant design decisions as individual ADRs in a dedicated folder and addressing the single outstanding documentation quality finding. Finally, tighten security and performance tooling by configuring .NET analyzers to block the build on warnings, ensuring that regressions are caught immediately rather than ignored.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
The .NET analyzers are running but not blocking — tighten them (set <AnalysisMode>All</AnalysisMode>, or treat analyzer warnings as errors on CI) so a security/quality regression fails the build rather than scrolling past as a warning.
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 5
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 301
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 90
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 5
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 56 of 60 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.8 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 60 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 385 of 396 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The test suite couldn't be built/run in-image and no coverage report is committed, so line coverage was not measured — and it is EXCLUDED from the score rather than scored on a LoC-ratio proxy. No coverage collector was found in your CI either, so there is no existing report to hand us. You can widen what we reach: optional: add a coverage collector to your test run and commit (or publish) its Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov output anywhere in the repo, or make the suite runnable in-image, and real coverage will be measured.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test reliability NOT MEASURED: the test run produced no results for any test tier, so no test ever ran and flakiness could not be exercised. The cause could not be attributed, so it is excluded from the score rather than read as an absence of tests.
D12 Dependency Hygiene — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. The NuGet registry this repository's packages resolve from could not be reached on this run, so no outdated, vulnerable or deprecated package could be read. The tool said: NU1301: Failed to retrieve information about 'Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions' from remote source 'https://grpc.jfrog.io/grpc/api/nuget/v3/grpc-nuget-dev/FindPackagesById()?id='Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions'&semVerLevel=2.0.0'. [CSharpToVB.sln] The proxy tunnel request to proxy 'http://egress:3128/' failed with status code '403'." [/tmp/code…. This is OUR side and an ENVIRONMENT fault — the collector exists and ran — so the remedy is the scan's network path to grpc.jfrog.io, and a re-run with it reachable measures this repository.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (2 contributor(s) across 516 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 99% of the history; the other 1 hold 1% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D17 Explicit Debt — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The C# workspace loaded this repository's projects but reported a load failure, and the dead-code reference search is unreliable over a graph that did not load cleanly, so it was skipped. The other debt markers on this row were read; dead symbols were not, and their absence from the score is not a finding that the code has none. First load diagnostic: Failure: Msbuild failed when processing the file 'CSharpToVB.Tests/CSharpToVB.Tests.vbproj' with message: Failed to retrieve information about 'Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions' from remote source 'https://grpc.jfrog.io/grpc/api/nuget/v3/grpc-nuget-dev/FindPackagesById()?id='Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions'&semVerLevel=2.0.0'.
The proxy tunne….
D18 Solution Shape — measured, with a gap in what it reached — Watchdog measured this, but not all of it. What it did not reach is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — so the numbers on that dimension cover less than the repository, and the part left out is not evidence that it would have passed. The build did not finish within its budget on this run; structural metrics are reported, build/warning status is unknown.
D22 Internal API Consistency — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. The loaded project set declares no packable project and no `.Contracts` project, so there is no intentionally-exposed surface for API consistency to be judged over.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Large codebase (26,511 production LoC in the .NET projects) with no declared bounded contexts — cross-boundary type coupling is unassessed Bounded contexts cannot be inferred from a codebase that is not physically organised by them (D-321), so with none declared there are no boundaries for the coupling pass to measure across. You can widen what we reach: name this codebase's bounded contexts (≥2 module groups, e.g. per subsystem) so cross-boundary type coupling can be assessed. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Nuget: grpc.jfrog.io could not be reached (NU1301: Failed to retrieve information about 'Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions' from remote source 'https://grpc.jfrog.io/grpc/api/nuget/v3/grpc-nuget-dev/FindPackagesById()?id='Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions'&semVerLevel=2.0.0'. The proxy tunnel request to proxy 'http://egress:3128/' failed with status code '403'.). The scanner exists and ran; what failed is the scan's network path to the registry, so nothing was read and nothing here is a statement about the repository. A re-run with the registry reachable measures it.
D39 IL Efficiency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. IL NOT MEASURED: the analyzer's build of this repository exited 1 and the cause could not be attributed, so no assemblies were produced and there was no IL to read. We do not read it as a defect in the repository: an unattributed failure leans OURS. D18 owns the question of whether this repository builds; it was not answered here.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
Package restore incomplete — third-party types were unresolved in part of the solution — NuGet restore did not complete for CSharpToVB.Tests/CSharpToVB.Tests.vbproj, so those projects were analysed with framework references only: every check keyed on a third-party type saw an error type there and reported nothing. Findings on those projects are a lower bound; run `dotnet restore` on them and rescan.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D14 License Compliance: License compatibility is checked against declared package metadata and a policy — mislabelled or missing license metadata, and obligations that depend on how you distribute, are not resolved here.
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D24 Comment Value: Comment value (WHY vs WHAT) is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it is advisory and cannot weigh a comment against the precise code change it was written to explain.
D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (4): D19, D21, D24, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
78 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration at 108. A further 8 method(s) were over the threshold but excluded as flat dispatchers (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), the largest being SyntaxKindExtensions.GetExpressionKind at 49 — they are counted neither in the figure above nor in this dimension's score. 3 files carry no cyclomatic complexity row at all for this reason — every one of their over-threshold methods was excluded, so the exclusion is disclosed nowhere in the file itself: CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxKindExtensions.vb (SyntaxKindExtensions.GetExpressionKind at 49), csvGenerator/ExceptionUtils.vb (ExceptionUtils.BuildException at 42), CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/XMLVisitor.vb (XmlVisitor.GetVbOperatorToken at 21). They are named here because the per-file figures other dimensions report are taken BEFORE this exclusion, so such a file can show a high maximum complexity elsewhere in this report and nothing here, with nothing to reconcile the two.
+ 73 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 9 bodies over 60 down to 60 or less in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration (cyclomatic 108), ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile (cyclomatic 103), NodesVisitor.VisitParameter (cyclomatic 78). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 9 together lifts Cyclomatic Complexity from 2.0 to about 3.8/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 60; a cleaner split scores higher.
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 113 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Bring the 118 bodies over 15 down to 15 or less in Cognitive Complexity — start with ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile (cognitive 372), NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression (cognitive 243), NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration (cognitive 198). — This score is capped by its worst body, so a finding fixed alone moves it by almost nothing — the next one down takes its place. Refactoring these 118 together lifts Cognitive Complexity from 2.0 to about 10.0/10, projected with the scoring formula itself and assuming each lands exactly at 15.
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes4.9 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 42 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with ExpressionVisitor.vb (6), MethodBodyVisitor.vb (6), DeclarationVisitor.vb (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (42 warning-level).
Resolve the 12 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with ExpressionVisitor.vb, MethodBodyVisitor.vb, DeclarationVisitor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (12 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with ArgumentListVisitor.vb, LineNumberItem.vb, SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
Resolve the 3 Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with DeclarationVisitor.vb, MethodBodyVisitor.vb, BlockExtensions.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb, SyntaxNavigator.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 2 Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with ConvertLiteralSupport.vb, ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.
Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.
What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.
Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.
Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.
Resolve the 1 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with ArgumentListVisitor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Whether the licenses of third-party packages are compatible with your policy.
Method: Third-party package licenses resolved from declared package metadata and checked against the configured policy (allow/deny/copyleft). Deterministic; clean = no incompatible license found at metadata depth.
0 of 226 packages use a banned license. ★ DEPTH: this repository's MSBuild projects declare 28 direct `PackageReference`(s), and 181 further package(s) were reached beyond them by closing the graph over nuget.org's own nuspec dependency graph — so a banned licence pulled in only by a dependency's OWN dependencies is inside this verdict. A package whose licence nuget.org could not be asked for is not graded, and version ranges are taken at their lower bound, so this is the closure as that graph states it rather than a restored consumer's exact resolution.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
21 deducted debt markers + unmeasured dead symbols across 26511 LoC in the .NET projects (0.2/KLoC) → score 9.7. Dead code not measured: the solution did not load cleanly, so the reference search was skipped.
Resolve the 3 EmptyCatchBlock finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with Compile.vb, ConversionResult.vb, TypeConverterSupport.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 issue-level).
Resolve the 17 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with ExpressionVisitor.vb (5), MethodBodyVisitor.vb (4), NamesVisitor.vb (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (17 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 HackComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with AttributesVisitor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.
Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.
7 projects, 145 source files, 37611 hand-written lines of code (26511 production / 11100 test — the split is derived per file: test is what its project, its own path, or a compile-guarded region marks as test, and a file carrying no test signal counts as production), plus 2983 generated (machine-written code — designer, scaffolded and tool-emitted files — excluded from quality), 9 inter-project edges (build status unknown — did not finish).
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The repository root README is a single cohesive document covering the C# to VB.Net converter: it states what the project does (convert C# to VB while preserving comments, formatting, and as many Directives as possible), lists prerequisites (VS 2022/17.3+, .NET Core 6.0), gives a license, technologies, topics, release download link, an updated date, a description of the conversion process, and notes that it requires VS 2019 16.3 to compile its output before VS 2022.
Documentation: no architecture or design documentation
Resolve the 1 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
0 naming inconsistencies across 16 sampled symbols.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D24 · Comment ValueExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory
What it measures: Whether comments are worth it — explaining WHY (valuable) rather than WHAT (redundant).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on deterministically sampled inline comments with surrounding code; findings verified back to sampled comments by substring match. Advisory, sampled.
What it measures: How far you must trace to follow a call — low indirection and co-located slices read easier.
Method: Call indirection (interface hops, cross-namespace calls, slice-locality scaled) over a sampled set of method invocations, size-aware baseline. Sampled; confidence discounted by symbol-resolution gaps. C# also names each pass-through layer (a class whose every public method only forwards its own parameters to one collaborator) as a located finding; the score is not affected.
Coverage: Slice locality from the first namespace segments, SAMPLED (≤400 methods) — not exhaustive.
77 % of calls cross a namespace and 1 % go through an interface, but 97 % of collaborators are co-located — so a call's collaborators sit together and tracing stays easy. Baseline: medium — clean/modular boundaries expected.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: Secret scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
5 finding(s): 0 critical, 2 high, 3 medium, 0 low. 2 unpinned-GitHub-Actions row(s) are reported here but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), which measures that posture as `pinned_actions` — one pinning decision is charged once, not once per lens.
REDACTED
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 2 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Static Analysis (SAST) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
No action in Static Analysis (SAST) — all 2 REDACTED finding(s) are reported here at file:line but scored by D36 (supply-chain provenance), so none is charged to this dimension. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 issue-level, 0 of them charged here).
Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
79 of 79 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb. Counted over 79 of the 118 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Most significant orphaned file · ×3CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1
Dormant codebase
What to do
Resolve the 76 Orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with NodesVisitor.vb, TextFieldParser.vb, NamespaceVisitor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (76 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 3 Most significant orphaned file finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness — start with ExpressionVisitor.vb, MethodBodyVisitor.vb, DeclarationVisitor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 recommendation-level).
Resolve the 1 Dormant codebase finding(s) in Knowledge Freshness. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
2 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 7 platform declaration(s) and 0 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a Rust toolchain pin, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Resolve the 2 End-of-life runtime finding(s) in Platform End-of-Life — start with ObjectPoolLibrary.csproj, TestConsoleApp.vbproj. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d44_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Other · Architecture — Whether the project-reference graph is acyclic (cycles block independent build/deploy and signal eroding boundaries).
Method: Project reference cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, using the engine shared with D5/D7; cyclic versus acyclic. Exhaustive, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether dependencies point inward (Domain ← Application ← Infrastructure/Web) — the clean-architecture dependency rule, checked across the project graph.
Method: Layer violations by name-segment inference (Domain/Core to Application to Infrastructure/Web) over the project-reference graph. Exhaustive over all projects, deterministic.
Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.
Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.
Do you agree with this assessment?
AX8 · Test isolation10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
Other · Architecture — Whether production projects stay free of references to test projects — tests may depend on production, never the reverse.
Method: Csproj graph: each production project checked for references to test projects (identified by test-framework presence, not name). Zero violations is clean. Deterministic.
Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.
Other · Code Health — Unfinished work detected by code SHAPE, not keywords: members that only throw a "not implemented" exception, methods that take inputs and return a constant, async methods that never await, dead `if (false)` / `#if false` branches, and skeleton types most of whose members are holes. A real, objective slice of technical debt.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: incompleteness by code shape (constant-returning methods, async-never-await, #if false branches, guards that return what the code already falls through to, tests an earlier guard already decided, comparisons against NaN, skeleton types), not keyword-gated. Deterministic, code-shape heuristic.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a build/run (quick start) section to the root README — the first thing a newcomer needs.
Explain in the README how to run the tests. Add a section called Testing to the README in the repository's top folder, saying how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 7 of 7 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
What to do
Record your significant design decisions. Write one short document per decision, giving its date, the situation, the decision and its consequences, and keep them together with your other design documents. A docs/adr folder with each file named by number and title is the easiest place to find them.
Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.
Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.
Production code isn't grouped under a src/ folder — it's spread across several top-level directories, so there's no one place that says 'this is the product'.
Only 1/7 projects share a common root namespace — the code's module identity is inconsistent.
What to do
Group production code under src/ (or split deliberately, e.g. backend/ + frontend/) so production and tooling code aren't mixed at the root.
Adopt a consistent root-namespace convention (a shared prefix, e.g. Acme.*); short project-file/directory names are fine as long as the RootNamespace is uniform.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
The .NET analyzers are running but not blocking — tighten them (set <AnalysisMode>All</AnalysisMode>, or treat analyzer warnings as errors on CI) so a security/quality regression fails the build rather than scrolling past as a warning.
Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
What to do
Keep a changelog (e.g. Keep-a-Changelog) recording what shipped in each release.
Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.
Other · Code Health — Whether any branch is dead by construction — a switch arm whose label can never equal a case-normalised subject, or an `else if` whose predicate the arm above has already swallowed.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: switch labels compared against the subject's own case normaliser, and if/else-if chains checked for a literal an earlier arm's containment test already swallows. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X13 · Undrained process stream10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a child process that has BOTH standard streams redirected drains both — reading one to the end while the other is never read deadlocks once the child fills the unread pipe.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: ProcessStartInfo launches with both streams redirected, checked for a drain of each stream across the enclosing type. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `spawn` imported from `child_process` whose stdout and stderr are both pipes (no options, no `stdio`, or `stdio` of `'pipe'`), bound to a local that never leaves its scope, where exactly one of the two streams is read, the other never, and the child’s `close`/`exit` (or the read stream’s end) is awaited; a shell redirect in the call’s arguments or a `kill` of the child suppresses it. The same rule reads Python’s `subprocess.Popen`, Dart’s `Process.start`, Ruby’s `Open3.popen3`, and Scala’s JDK process starts (`new ProcessBuilder(…).start()` with no `redirectErrorStream`/`redirectError`/`redirectOutput`/`inheritIO`, `Runtime.getRuntime.exec`) where one of `getInputStream`/`getErrorStream` is read and the other never while `waitFor()` is called or the read stream is read to its end. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Security — Whether a hand-rolled public/private IP check can be walked past — a method that unwraps IPv4-mapped IPv6 but returns the opposite verdict for the same host written as IPv4-compatible, 6to4 or NAT64.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and hand-roll IPv4 range carve-outs, checked for whether the IPv6 branch also accounts for the IPv4-compatible, 6to4 and NAT64 embeddings. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X15 · Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a length read out of the stream being parsed is bounded before it is allocated or read — an unchecked count taken from the input lets the input choose the allocation.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: integer lengths read from a BinaryReader and spent on a bulk read or an array allocation, checked for any comparison or bounding call on the value anywhere in the method. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a loop that shortens a string until it fits a length budget has a floor — one with none grinds the value down to the empty string, or past it into a negative-length `Substring`.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: while/do loops whose body's only effect on a string is to drop its last character, checked for whether anything — a direct comparison on the length, a body guard, a break — bounds that length below. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `while`/`do` loop whose body’s one assignment to a value is `x = x.slice(0, -1)` or `x = x.slice|substring|substr(0, x.length - 1)`, driven by a condition that reads `x.length` only as a term of a larger expression — never compared directly, never tested for truthiness, and with no other read of `x` — and whose body has no `break`, `return`, `throw` or `if` naming `x`. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X17 · Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether a walk that recurses through a JSON/XML tree handed in by its caller bounds how deep it will go — an uncapped walk lets the document's nesting choose the stack depth, and the resulting StackOverflowException cannot be caught.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: methods that take a JSON/XML document node and call themselves with a child of it, reachable from an externally-callable member of the same type that accepts a document, checked for any depth parameter, descent counter or threaded arithmetic anywhere in the walk. On a repository with no .NET source it reads TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths and `.d.ts` not) with the same rule: a function or method with a parameter typed as a document value — `unknown`, `any`, `object`, `Record<string, unknown|any>`, a JSON alias (`JsonValue`, `JSONObject`, …) or a DOM node global the file does not rebind — that calls itself (bare, or through `this` for a method, or hands itself to a call over the value as in `value.map(walk)`) with something it took out of that value and never through an ancestor accessor such as `closest()` or `parentElement`, that is exported or reached from an exported function (a public method of the same exported class) taking such a value, and that names no depth, level, nesting, recursion, remaining or budget anywhere and threads no `+`/`-` arithmetic through a self-call. Plain JavaScript is not read: with no annotation nothing tells a parsed document from a tree the code built itself. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a type's disposal matches what it OWNS — releasing what it created, leaving alone what it was handed, and not declaring a finalizer for state that has nothing unmanaged to finalize.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: every assignment to a disposable field is read to decide whether the type CREATED the value or was handed it, and the type's disposal is checked against that answer — an injected interface it disposes, a value it constructed and never releases, a finalizer on a type holding nothing unmanaged, and a disposable local whose every reference is a plain member read. A value handed to a container that disposes its contents (a parent control's `Controls` collection, a component `IContainer`) is released by that container and is not reported; generated code is out of population. On a repository with no .NET source the same ownership questions are read in JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored, generated and minified paths not): a class declaring `dispose()`, `[Symbol.dispose]()` or `[Symbol.asyncDispose]()` that disposes a field it was handed through a constructor parameter typed as a repository interface or resolved by a dependency-injection container; that assigns a field only ever from `new X(…)` of a disposable class and neither releases it anywhere in the class nor names it in its disposal member or a method that member calls, nor hands it to anything else; and a `const`/`let` local built from literals only whose every reference opens a statement operating on a non-release member of it. A class is disposable when every repository declaration of its name declares or inherits a disposal member, or when it is a documented library disposable (`vscode` EventEmitter, CancellationTokenSource and Disposable; three.js geometries, materials, textures, render targets, renderers, controls and composers). The finalizer arm has no JavaScript counterpart: a class cannot declare one. Dart is read for the owned-and-never-released arm: a Flutter `State` (or a class declaring `dispose()`/`close()`) whose library-private field is written only with direct creations of a framework controller, `FocusNode`, `StreamController` or periodic `Timer` (or a `.listen(…)` into a field declared `StreamSubscription`), which nothing in the class or its library releases (`dispose`/`close`/`cancel`) and which is never handed on except as a named argument. Ruby is read for the owned-and-never-released arm and the abandoned-local arm: a class declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose instance variable is written only with a blockless core descriptor creation (`File.open`/`new`, `Tempfile`, `Dir.open`, `IO.popen`, the `socket` and `openssl` socket classes) that no method of the class closes and that is never handed on (passed, returned, stored, exposed by `attr_reader`, delegated) — a class whose superclass or mixin lies outside the repository is not judged — and a blockless creation read through and dropped (`File.open(path).read`) or held in a local that is never closed, returned, passed or stored (a `&:read` block-pass, an `autoclose: false` borrow and a `fileno` hand-over are not abandonment). PHP is read for the same two arms: a class (not a trait, and not one using a trait) declaring an instance `close`, `dispose`, `shutdown`, `stop`, `disconnect` or `terminate` whose `private` property (or a `final` class's `protected` one) is written only with a direct core `fopen`, `tmpfile`, `popen`, `proc_open`, `fsockopen`, `stream_socket_client`/`server` or `opendir` that nothing in the class closes (`fclose`, `pclose`, `closedir`, `unset`, a reset to `null`) and that is never handed on, and a handle held in a function's local, or read through as the argument of a reader, that is never closed, returned, passed, captured or stored; a `php://` stream, `curl_init`, `SplFileObject`, `PDO` and a function the repository declares under the core name are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that temporarily changes state belonging to the whole process — the working directory, an environment variable — puts it back on EVERY path: a restore reached only when nothing throws leaks the change to the rest of the process.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: method bodies that write the process working directory or an environment variable and write it back in the same body, checked for whether that restore sits in a `finally`/`catch` or only on the straight-line path. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads production JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not): `process.chdir`, `process.env.NAME =`/`["NAME"] =` and `delete process.env.NAME`, and Deno’s `Deno.chdir`/`Deno.env.set`/`Deno.env.delete`, paired per function body (a nested function or arrow is its own body, and module top-level code is none), where the last write puts back a local the body captured from the same global or deletes a variable the first write set, with at least one statement between them; a write in a `catch`/`finally` of that body silences it. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether an argument guard throws the exception its own condition describes — a guard that rejects a value for being EMPTY and reports it as `ArgumentNullException` tells the caller a parameter was null when it provably was not.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(p))` statements controlled by an `if`, whose condition is read for a test that is true of a NON-null `p` — an emptiness test that dereferences it (`p.Count == 0`, `!p.Any()`) or a BCL predicate documented true of the empty value (`string.IsNullOrEmpty(p)`). Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a `when` guard is free of side effects — a guard that increments a counter or assigns while deciding whether its arm matches applies that change during PATTERN MATCHING, on an arm that may not be selected, and skips it entirely when a short-circuit to its left answers first.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `when` guards on case labels and switch-expression arms, read for a mutation (`++`/`--`/assignment) sitting in a position the guard's own `&&`/`||`/`??`/`?:`/`?.` can skip. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a method that TAKES a lock or semaphore and gives it back from a flag-guarded `finally` returns the value that flag implies — reporting success while the guard hands the primitive back admits a second caller the exclusion was there to keep out, and reporting failure while the guard keeps it leaves nothing to ever give it back.
Method: Roslyn syntax: `try` statements whose `finally` releases a synchronisation primitive under a bare local-bool guard, where the method also TOOK that same primitive before the `try`, checked for a `return` of a bool literal whose value disagrees with the flag state the method's own straight-line assignments put it in. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether the work a diagnostic log line costs is paid only when that line is wanted — C# evaluates a call's arguments BEFORE the call, so a trace/debug message joined or projected out of a collection is built in full on every pass, and then discarded by a sink the shipped configuration leaves switched off.
Method: Roslyn syntax: log calls at a diagnostic level (a `Log`-prefixed method naming Trace/Debug/Verbose, or a bare `Debug`/`Trace`/`Verbose` on a receiver named for a logger), whose argument list is read for a call whose cost scales with a sequence — a LINQ operator, a materialisation, `string.Join`, a serializer — with no enclosing level check or conditional-compilation region. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `debug`/`trace`/`verbose` call on a receiver named for a logger, or a `log`-prefixed method naming the level, whose argument calls an array operator (`map`/`filter`/`reduce`/`sort`/…), `Array.from`, `Object.keys/values/entries`, `JSON.stringify`/`util.inspect` over anything but a literal, or an array `join` — outside any arrow or function passed as an argument, which the logger calls only when the level is on — with no enclosing `if`, `&&` or `?:` whose condition names a level, a level string, or the `NODE_ENV`/`__DEV__`/`DEV` build switch. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X24 · Document value interpolated into markup unescaped10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Security — Whether text read out of the document being converted is escaped before it is written into generated markup — a value the document's author chose, interpolated into an attribute the surrounding literal delimits, can close that attribute and open another.
Method: Roslyn semantic model over the whole compilation: a string-typed `Value`/`InnerText`/`InnerXml`/`Text` member declared inside `DocumentFormat.OpenXml` or `System.Xml` is a taint SOURCE, propagated through assignments, returns, arguments, tuple elements and string composition to its transitive closure, then read at interpolated-string holes that sit in a markup position the surrounding literal itself delimits. Escaper/encoder calls and enclosing validator conditions cut the flow. Flow- and container-insensitive by construction. A second arm needs no provenance at all and reports a type that CONTRADICTS ITSELF — the same expression escaped at one delimited markup hole and interpolated raw at another hole in the same markup position of the same type, which the type's own escaping proves is a defect without knowing where the value came from. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the token stream with the same rule: a DOM read of raw document text (`getAttribute`, `textContent`, `innerText`, `nodeValue`) is the source, propagated through local bindings and string composition, and judged at template-literal and concatenation holes in the same two delimited markup positions; escapers and validating conditions cut it, and documentation-site, test, vendored and minified scripts are not read. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value the caller is invited to supply is the value the type actually uses — a constructor parameter stored in a private field that nothing ever reads while the default it was given is spelled out a second time at the site that should have read it, a keyed lookup that falls back to a different setting than the one its key names while the same type falls back to the matching one for that same key, or a culture-sensitive parse given no format provider by a type that feeds its own settable culture to the same kind of parse elsewhere, or a number an entry point writes to standard output under the host's culture while the same entry point formats with the invariant culture elsewhere. Either way, every caller who supplies a value silently gets something else.
Method: Roslyn syntax: private instance fields of a non-partial type assigned in a constructor from one of its own parameters with a `??` fallback, checked for whether anything in the type body reads the field and whether that same fallback expression is spelled out again outside the constructor; and `??` fallbacks onto a member access from a lookup call carrying exactly one string literal, grouped by that key across the type and checked for a fallback member whose folded name disagrees with the key while a sibling site for the same key agrees with it. On a repository with no .NET source the first two arms read JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `#x`, `private` or `private` parameter-property instance field filled in the constructor from a parameter (or one member of one) through `??`/`||` or a parameter default, never read anywhere in the file by name, whose constructed default is spelled again in the class body; and `lookup("key") ?? s.member` grouped by key per class, or per module outside every class. The culture arm has no JavaScript counterpart: its parses take no locale. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether a value handed from a callback to the body that waits on it crosses on something built to be crossed — a `Queue<T>`/`List<T>`/`Dictionary<K,V>` written inside an event handler and read back outside it is mutated by two flows at once, and the semaphore or completion source beside it orders how MANY items exist while leaving the collection's own head, tail and backing array unprotected.
Method: Roslyn syntax: method, accessor, local-function and lambda bodies that declare BOTH a non-thread-safe generic collection (`Queue`/`Stack`/`List`/`Dictionary`/`HashSet`/`Sorted*`/`LinkedList`) and a synchronisation primitive (`SemaphoreSlim`/`TaskCompletionSource`/`ManualResetEvent(Slim)`/`AutoResetEvent`/`CountdownEvent`) as locals, then read for a `+=`-registered lambda that raises that primitive while the body outside every lambda waits on it — and, in that scope, a mutating call on the collection inside the lambda paired with a mention of it outside. Any `lock` in the scope abstains it. On a repository with no .NET source the same handoff is read in Java off the engine’s own token stream (test source sets, vendored and demonstration paths not): an `ArrayList`/`LinkedList`/`ArrayDeque`/`PriorityQueue`/`Hash*`/`LinkedHash*`/`Tree*` local and a `CountDownLatch`/`Semaphore`/`CompletableFuture` local, a lambda or anonymous class that raises the primitive and mutates the collection, and a wait outside it; any `synchronized` or `lock()` abstains the body. Because each of those primitives orders what the callback wrote before raising it, only a touch that provably overlaps the callback is convicted: one after the registration and before the next wait, or one in a loop registered-before, waiting on every pass and not declaring the collection. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X27 · Collection changed while being enumerated10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a `foreach` leaves the collection it is walking alone — a body that adds to or removes from the very collection the loop is enumerating invalidates the enumerator it is holding, so the next `MoveNext` throws `InvalidOperationException` and the remaining items are never seen.
Method: Roslyn syntax + semantics: `foreach` statements whose body calls a structural mutator (`Add`/`Remove`/`Clear`/`Insert`/…) on the very expression the loop is enumerating. Two arms. ARM A — the source is a concrete fragile BCL collection, or a live `Keys`/`Values` view over one, and the mutator resolves to that same collection's own member; concurrent and immutable collections and arrays are outside the population by construction, since their enumerators survive a structural change. ARM B — the source is an argument-less accessor CALL on a receiver whose body is in source: the accessor must return a stored field VERBATIM and a sibling member must structurally change that same field, both read off the implementations rather than from the members' names. A mutation the loop provably exits immediately after (`break`/`return`/`throw`/`goto`), or one written inside a nested loop or a lambda, is counted and never reported. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X28 · Index access outside its own emptiness guard10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a condition that tests a value for emptiness indexes that same value only where the test holds — an `||` written one parenthesis too far to the left leaves an index access outside the guard beside it, so the empty case the guard exists to anticipate reaches the index and throws.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: the OUTERMOST `&&`/`||` of every boolean condition, read for a symbol the condition tests for emptiness (`string.IsNullOrEmpty`/`IsNullOrWhiteSpace`, a `Length`/`Count` comparison against a literal, `Any()`, a `Length`/`Count` pattern, or a comparison against `""`) and ALSO indexes. Each `symbol[...]` access is placed by a boolean-reachability walk from the access up to the outermost connective: an access is COVERED when some enclosing step has it in the right operand and the left operand, under the truth value that step forces, proves the symbol non-empty — a recursion over `&&`/`||` whose true- and false-directions are asymmetric. A finding needs BOTH an uncovered access and a covered one on the same symbol in the same condition, which is the agreeing twin that separates a misplaced parenthesis from an unrelated length test. Bare index accesses with no emptiness test in the condition are neither counted nor reported; a non-identifier receiver and a lambda nested inside the condition are outside the population. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X29 · Per-element action decided by a fixed element10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a decision taken once per element is taken ABOUT that element — a test inside a counted loop that reads a fixed subscript of the very collection its guarded statement indexes by the loop variable applies element zero's answer to all of them, so the elements that differ from it are all handled wrongly, and in the same direction.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every `for` statement declaring exactly ONE loop variable, and every `if` inside its body that is not under a nested loop or a lambda. A site enters the population when the `if`’s condition never mentions the loop variable while the statement it guards indexes some collection by that variable ALONE (`c[i]`; `c[i + 1]` and `c[i, j]` are outside it). A finding additionally needs the AGREEING TWIN at the same-collection grain: the condition must read THAT SAME collection at a subscript that does not move — written into the condition, or reached through a local declared BEFORE the loop, so an alias bound inside the body is not followed. Both collection expressions must be simple identifiers. On a repository with no .NET source the same rule reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (tests included, bundles and vendored paths not): a `for (let|var|const x = …; …; …)` with one declarator and a braced body, an alias followed only when it is declared before the loop in a block that encloses it and never assigned inside the loop. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X30 · Support guard that admits what it rejects10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a guard written as a NEGATED `||` says what its author meant — `!(a || b || x != k)` is `!a && !b && x == k` by De Morgan, so a bail-out that mixes capabilities the code needs with a fault it refuses turns inside out: it fires only where the capabilities are ABSENT, and lets every value the fault term names walk straight into the body that cannot handle it.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every logical-not whose operand is a parenthesised `||` chain of two or more disjuncts, flattened (a left-nested `a || b || c` read once would see `(a || b)` as one disjunct). A site enters the population on that shape alone. A finding additionally needs the disjuncts to DISAGREE in polarity: at least one bare boolean read — an identifier or member access, never an invocation, which is a predicate rather than a capability flag — and at least one `x != <constant>`, the only form that negates into an exact-value pin (`== null` negates into a looser requirement and is outside the fault set). Consistently-polarised disjunctions, all-fault or all-capability, are counted and never reported; a negated `&&` is outside the population entirely. No same-receiver gate: it was measured to cost a real defect and remove no false positive. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Do you agree with this assessment?
X32 · Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged
Other · Code Health — Whether a plugin lookup names the type it means — searching every assembly loaded into the process for a candidate whose SIMPLE name equals a string supplied at runtime, and taking the first one found, is decided by assembly LOAD ORDER rather than by this source, so the same name can resolve to a different type on the next run.
Method: Roslyn syntax only, no semantic model: every invocation of `First`/`FirstOrDefault`/`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` whose OWN expression subtree contains both a `GetAssemblies()` call and a `GetTypes()`/`GetExportedTypes()` call — a single-element pick out of every type loaded into the process. A nested selector in the same chain sees no `GetAssemblies()` in its own subtree and is outside the population, so one lookup counts once however many links its chain has. A finding additionally needs both remaining halves: the selector must be `First`/`FirstOrDefault` (`Single`/`SingleOrDefault` reports the ambiguity rather than resolving it, and is counted and never reported), and the chain must carry an `==` comparison of `<lambda parameter>.Name` against something that is not a literal. The receiver must be a plain identifier bound by one of the chain’s own lambdas, which places `assembly.GetName().Name == "X"` outside the rule by construction. One exemption: a `.Name` test joined by `&&` to a `FullName`/`AssemblyQualifiedName` test on the same identifier is spared; joined by `||` it is not. Deterministic, provable per finding. Advisory.
Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.
Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. On a repository with no .NET source it reads JavaScript/TypeScript off the engine’s own token stream (test, vendored and minified paths not) with the same rule: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal`/`verbose`/`silly`/`http`/`log` call on a receiver named for a logger, in a package whose own or an enclosing `package.json` declares a logger that carries values as fields (pino, pino-http, nestjs-pino, Fastify, winston, bunyan, tslog, LogTape, roarr), whose first deciding argument is a template literal with substitutions; an object-literal fields argument is stepped over, a plain string message clears the call. Python is read the same way: a `debug`/`info`/`warning`/`error`/`exception`/`critical`/`log` call on a logger in a file that imports the standard library’s `logging` or structlog (loguru, which formats at the call, is not judged), whose message is a whole f-string with a non-constant field; a `%`-formatted, `.format()`-ed or concatenated message is not convicted, as in C#. PHP is read the same way: a PSR-3 level call (`emergency`…`debug`, `log`) on a logger (`$logger`, `$this->logger`, Laravel’s `Log::`, `logger()`, `\Drupal::logger()`) in a package whose `composer.json` requires a PSR-3 logger or a framework that hands one out (psr/log, Monolog, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, CakePHP), or a file that imports one, whose message is a double-quoted string interpolating a variable; a single-quoted message clears the call, and `sprintf` or `.` concatenation is not convicted, as in C#. Dart is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on Sentry’s structured logger (`Sentry.logger`) whose message is a whole string literal interpolating a value (`$name`, `${…}`); the `Sentry.logger.fmt` template API clears the call. Dart that logs only through loggers with one message and no fields (package:logging, package:logger, talker, dart:developer) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Ruby is read the same way: a `trace`/`debug`/`info`/`warn`/`error`/`fatal` call on the console gem’s `Console` (declared by a Gemfile, gemspec or Gemfile.lock, or required) or, where SemanticLogger, Ougai or dry-logger is declared or required, on a receiver named for a logger (`logger`, `@logger`, `Rails.logger`, `log`), whose first deciding argument is, as the whole argument, a double-quoted string interpolating a non-constant value (`#{…}`, `#@ivar`); a plain literal clears the call, keyword arguments are the fields, and a block, `%`-format or `+` concatenation is not convicted. Ruby that logs only through the standard Logger (Rails.logger) is not applicable rather than a reach gap. Deterministic.
Other · Code Health — Whether nullable reference types are enabled and not undermined by heavy `!` suppression.
Method: Roslyn compiler-options scan: NullableContextOptions per project; null-forgiving (!) suppression density per 1k syntax nodes. Deterministic, adoption plus suppression penalty.
0/1 NRT-eligible project(s) enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> (projects targeting a pre-C#-8 framework are excluded — NRTs aren't available there). NRTs catch a whole class of null-deref bugs at compile time.
What to do
Enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> across all projects and resolve warnings rather than suppressing with `!`.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Reference — by lens
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Unscored — 2 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — 1 observation(s) recorded · The CI pipeline builds and tests but publishes no released artifact — no package publish, container push, GitHub release or deployment step. Supply-chain provenance, signing and SBOM attest RELEASED artifacts, so there is nothing to attest here. Add them to the release pipeline when this repo starts shipping artifacts (a published package, a container image, a deployed service or a tagged release). Build integrity and workflow-token hygiene are reported below: they describe what the CI runs and the token it runs with, neither of which is affected by whether the pipeline ships an artifact.
SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — 1 observation(s) recorded · Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Not evidenced — 2 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 56 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
AX6 Interface segregation — no public interfaces
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB1 Runtime evidence locked — no reproducible boot — This repository has nothing the runtime tiers could boot or serve — no markup, no UI framework or web-server dependency, no UI component source, no native UI project and no API definition — nothing here is a surface to boot — so runtime a11y/egress/header evidence has no subject here. Not applicable: this is neither a gap in the scan nor a finding about your code.
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — no web/app surface to authorize (no HTTP API or web-UI project) and no authorization code at all (no [Authorize]/policies, no imperative guard methods). Access control is therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI, which is authorized by its CALLER, not by itself. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
D10 Test Quality — ~11100 lines of test source are present (.vb) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so skipped/assertion-free tests couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not measured — no test run produced results
D12 Dependency Hygiene — Dependency hygiene not measured — grpc.jfrog.io could not be reached
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D22 Internal API Consistency — No intentionally-exposed public API to evaluate for consistency.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — Cross-context type coupling could not be assessed — this codebase's bounded contexts are neither declared nor inferable.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities — Not measured — a package registry could not be reached
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
D39 IL Efficiency — IL not measured — the analyzer's build of the target did not succeed
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D43 Malicious Dependencies — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not measured
D9 Test Distribution — Test source is present (.vb) but no test cases reached the test census for this repository — no test root we could resolve declared them, or the files we read declare no cases in a test framework we recognise — so its unit/integration/BDD/E2E split couldn't be counted. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
DM1 Domain Modelling — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
P12 CI test-gate honesty — Reported, not scored — and nothing was matched here. The coverage check applies to any stack, and the automatic-re-run check to any GitHub-Actions workflow, but the checks for excluded tests, skipped tests and sleep-based synchronisation currently recognise only some ecosystems' test-runner idioms, so on a repository built with another stack the zeros below mean 'not checked', not 'clean'.
P2 Observability — This repo is a library, not a deployed service — it has no process to operate, so production observability (structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks) is N/A. A library may log via an injected ILogger, but the absence of operational telemetry is not a defect here. If it grows a host (web API, worker), the dimension reactivates.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — this isn't a service/API/worker
P8 Schema migrations — no EF Core usage detected
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Cobertura — `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` with a `coverlet.collector` PackageReference) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
S1 Web-Security Posture — No web surface detected in the analyzed source — no HTTP API or web-UI project (no controllers/minimal-API endpoints, no Razor/Blazor views) and no web middleware (HTTPS redirection, HSTS, security headers, cookies). Transport security, security headers, secure cookies, CSRF/input-validation and middleware-order controls are therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI/worker, not a web app. Crypto hygiene was still checked and found nothing to flag. If this codebase becomes web-facing, the dimension reactivates automatically.
X10 Duplicated predicate — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X2 Cancellation propagation — no async method does work a token could cancel
X6 Hand-rolled structured-format parsing — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X7 Silent fallback defaults — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
EmptyCatchBlock CSharpToVB/Utilities/Compile.vb:102— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock CodeConverter/SupportClasses/ConversionResult.vb:28— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
EmptyCatchBlock CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:464— empty catch block — the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or let it propagate. Where swallowing one specific failure really is correct — as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure — catch exactly that exception type and write down WHY in a comment on the catch. Both are needed: a comment on a catch-all still swallows every failure nobody anticipated, and a note that only restates the swallow ("ignored", "do nothing") is read as no explanation at all.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:711— MethodTooLong — VisitMethodDeclaration runs 341 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 241 over it, 3.41× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:566— MethodTooLong — VisitAssignmentExpression runs 335 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 235 over it, 3.35× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb:205— MethodTooLong — ConvertProjectFile runs 301 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 201 over it, 3.01× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitPropertyDeclaration CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:1113— MethodTooLong — VisitPropertyDeclaration runs 279 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 179 over it, 2.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ConvertTriviaList CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb:174— MethodTooLong — ConvertTriviaList runs 240 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 140 over it, 2.40× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitParameter CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ParametersVisitor.vb:60— MethodTooLong — VisitParameter runs 238 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 138 over it, 2.38× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitClassDeclaration CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:325— MethodTooLong — VisitClassDeclaration runs 222 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 122 over it, 2.22× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitRecordDeclaration CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:342— MethodTooLong — VisitRecordDeclaration runs 198 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 98 over it, 1.98× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.ConvertSolutionFile CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:115— MethodTooLong — ConvertSolutionFile runs 183 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 83 over it, 1.83× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SyntaxTokenExtensions.WithModifiedTokenTrivia CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:477— MethodTooLong — WithModifiedTokenTrivia runs 182 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 82 over it, 1.82× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: StatementExtensions.RestructureAttributesAndModifiers CodeConverter/Extensions/StatementExtensions.vb:136— MethodTooLong — RestructureAttributesAndModifiers runs 179 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 79 over it, 1.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ConvertLiteralSupport.GetLiteralExpression CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:129— MethodTooLong — GetLiteralExpression runs 178 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 78 over it, 1.78× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitBinaryExpression CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:933— MethodTooLong — VisitBinaryExpression runs 174 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 74 over it, 1.74× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: LineNumbersForRichTextBox.OnPaint CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:793— MethodTooLong — OnPaint runs 169 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 69 over it, 1.69× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustNodeTrivia CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:30— MethodTooLong — AdjustNodeTrivia runs 161 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 61 over it, 1.61× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SyntaxNormalizer.RewriteTrivia CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:540— MethodTooLong — RewriteTrivia runs 161 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 61 over it, 1.61× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.ConvertLambdaExpression CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:108— MethodTooLong — ConvertLambdaExpression runs 159 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 59 over it, 1.59× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SyntaxNodeExtensions.WithTrailingEol CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:486— MethodTooLong — WithTrailingEol runs 152 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 52 over it, 1.52× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: TypeConverterSupport.ConvertToType CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:310— MethodTooLong — ConvertToType runs 152 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 52 over it, 1.52× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleExpression CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:407— MethodTooLong — ConvertSingleExpression runs 148 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 48 over it, 1.48× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitCompilationUnit CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:118— MethodTooLong — VisitCompilationUnit runs 146 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 46 over it, 1.46× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.AdjustExpressionTrivia CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:26— MethodTooLong — AdjustExpressionTrivia runs 141 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 41 over it, 1.41× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsSeparator CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:191— MethodTooLong — NeedsSeparator runs 140 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 40 over it, 1.40× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor.VisitSwitchExpression CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:619— MethodTooLong — VisitSwitchExpression runs 139 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 39 over it, 1.39× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: VariableDeclarationExtensions.RemodelVariableDeclaration CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:144— MethodTooLong — RemodelVariableDeclaration runs 136 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.36× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:494— ' ToDo correctly fill in parameter list — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:1317— ' TODO find better way to find out if we are in interface — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:712— ' TODO capture and leading comments from node.left — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1232— ' Only notify once on one line TODO Merge the comments — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1772— ' TODO Handle better — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1775— ' TODO Handle better — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1784— ' TODO Handle better — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:647— ' TODO use line continuation instead of space — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1580— ' TODO Handle ref expressions — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1627— ' TODO Handle — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1631— ' TODO Handle — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:29— 'TODO: Deal with named parameters — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:247— ' TODO Workaround till we get a list of special variables — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:292— ' ' TODO Workaround till we get a list of special variables — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:764— ' TODO Implement — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:440— ' TODO workaround for not being able to be application symbols — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
TodoComment TestConsoleApp/Program.vb:53— ' TODO: Uncomment these lines if you want to return immediately if the injected program isn't valid _before_ running generators — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `' REF: #123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
FileTooLong: CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb— FileTooLong — 2086 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1586 over it, 4.17× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb— FileTooLong — 1698 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1198 over it, 3.40× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb— FileTooLong — 1318 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 818 over it, 2.64× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb— FileTooLong — 1129 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 629 over it, 2.26× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Forms/Form1.vb CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb— FileTooLong — 997 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 497 over it, 1.99× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb— FileTooLong — 941 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 441 over it, 1.88× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb— FileTooLong — 869 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 369 over it, 1.74× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb— FileTooLong — 797 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 297 over it, 1.59× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb— FileTooLong — 757 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 257 over it, 1.51× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb— FileTooLong — 617 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 117 over it, 1.23× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb— FileTooLong — 603 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 103 over it, 1.21× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb— FileTooLong — 538 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 38 over it, 1.08× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
ClassTooLong: CSharpConverter CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ArgumentListVisitor.vb— ClassTooLong — 8249 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 0 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 7849 over it, 20.62× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: LineNumbersForRichTextBox CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumberItem.vb— ClassTooLong — 806 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 14 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 406 over it, 2.02× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SyntaxNodeExtensions CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb— ClassTooLong — 609 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 27 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 209 over it, 1.52× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SyntaxTokenExtensions CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb— ClassTooLong — 598 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 21 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 198 over it, 1.50× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: TypeConverterSupport CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb— ClassTooLong — 532 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 12 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 132 over it, 1.33× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ConvertProjectFileUtilities CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb— ClassTooLong — 487 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 5 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 87 over it, 1.22× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: SyntaxTriviaListExtensions CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb— ClassTooLong — 454 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 16 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 54 over it, 1.14× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: StatementMarker CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb— ClassTooLong — 435 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 21 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 35 over it, 1.09× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb— ClassTooLong — 410 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 12 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 10 over it, 1.03× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: CSharpConverter.NodesVisitor CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ArgumentListVisitor.vb— TooManyMethods — 6537 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 185 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 155 over it, 6.17× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: SyntaxNormalizer CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb— TooManyMethods — 1123 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 105 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 75 over it, 3.50× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Form1 CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb— TooManyMethods — 990 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 91 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 61 over it, 3.03× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: TextFieldParser csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb— TooManyMethods — 851 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 51 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 21 over it, 1.70× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: CSharpConverter.MethodBodyVisitor CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb— TooManyMethods — 1684 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 46 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 16 over it, 1.53× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:64— CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:64-71 | CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:101-108 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:252— CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:252-259 | CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:768-775 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) CodeConverter/Extensions/BlockExtensions.vb:18— CodeConverter/Extensions/BlockExtensions.vb:18-25 | CodeConverter/Extensions/BlockExtensions.vb:43-50 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:582— CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:582-591 | CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:616-625 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNavigator.vb:135— CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNavigator.vb:135-145 | CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNavigator.vb:184-193 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:112— CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:112-118 | CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:182-188 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:240— CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:240-246 | CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:271-277 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:399— CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:399-403 | CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:555-559 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:552` calls `ExpressionStatement`, `CType` and `CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:397` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:135— CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:135-139 | CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:158-162 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
End-of-life runtime: .NET net6.0 ObjectPoolLibrary/ObjectPoolLibrary.csproj:4— ObjectPoolLibrary/ObjectPoolLibrary.csproj declares .NET net6.0 as this project's target framework, and .NET 6 LTS, support ended 2024-11-12. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2024-11-12 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended.
End-of-life runtime: .NET netcoreapp3.1 TestConsoleApp/TestConsoleApp.vbproj:6— TestConsoleApp/TestConsoleApp.vbproj declares .NET netcoreapp3.1 as this project's target framework, and .NET Core 3.1 LTS, support ended 2022-12-13. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2022-12-13 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended.
NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration (cyclomatic 108) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:711— NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 108 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile (cyclomatic 103) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb:205— ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile has cyclomatic complexity 103 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitParameter (cyclomatic 78) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ParametersVisitor.vb:60— NodesVisitor.VisitParameter has cyclomatic complexity 78 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression (cyclomatic 77) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:566— NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression has cyclomatic complexity 77 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ConvertLiteralSupport.GetLiteralExpression (cyclomatic 76) CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:129— ConvertLiteralSupport.GetLiteralExpression has cyclomatic complexity 76 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsSeparator (cyclomatic 75) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:191— SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsSeparator has cyclomatic complexity 75 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ConvertTriviaList (cyclomatic 68) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb:174— SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ConvertTriviaList has cyclomatic complexity 68 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.ConvertSolutionFile (cyclomatic 65) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:115— ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.ConvertSolutionFile has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.WithTrailingEol (cyclomatic 65) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:486— SyntaxNodeExtensions.WithTrailingEol has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitPropertyDeclaration (cyclomatic 58) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:1113— NodesVisitor.VisitPropertyDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 58 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitClassDeclaration (cyclomatic 58) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:325— NodesVisitor.VisitClassDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 58 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitCompilationUnit (cyclomatic 57) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:118— NodesVisitor.VisitCompilationUnit has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxNormalizer.RewriteTrivia (cyclomatic 57) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:540— SyntaxNormalizer.RewriteTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.WithModifiedTokenTrivia (cyclomatic 55) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:477— SyntaxTokenExtensions.WithModifiedTokenTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 55 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustNodeTrivia (cyclomatic 50) CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:30— LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustNodeTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 50 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertToType (cyclomatic 49) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:310— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertToType has cyclomatic complexity 49 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.AdjustExpressionTrivia (cyclomatic 48) CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:26— ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.AdjustExpressionTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitBinaryExpression (cyclomatic 47) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:933— NodesVisitor.VisitBinaryExpression has cyclomatic complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
LineNumbersForRichTextBox.OnPaint (cyclomatic 45) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:793— LineNumbersForRichTextBox.OnPaint has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitIdentifierName (cyclomatic 45) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:342— NodesVisitor.VisitIdentifierName has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
AttributeAndModifierSupport.GetVisibilityKeyword (cyclomatic 41) CodeConverter/Utilities/AttributeAndModifierSupport.vb:49— AttributeAndModifierSupport.GetVisibilityKeyword has cyclomatic complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
StatementExtensions.RestructureAttributesAndModifiers (cyclomatic 40) CodeConverter/Extensions/StatementExtensions.vb:136— StatementExtensions.RestructureAttributesAndModifiers has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleExpression (cyclomatic 39) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:407— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleExpression has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.ConvertLambdaExpression (cyclomatic 38) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:108— NodesVisitor.ConvertLambdaExpression has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitLiteralExpression (cyclomatic 37) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1677— NodesVisitor.VisitLiteralExpression has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.ConvertAndModifyNodeTrivia (cyclomatic 34) CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:225— LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.ConvertAndModifyNodeTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitArgument (cyclomatic 33) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ArgumentListVisitor.vb:41— NodesVisitor.VisitArgument has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
VariableDeclarationExtensions.RemodelVariableDeclaration (cyclomatic 33) CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:144— VariableDeclarationExtensions.RemodelVariableDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitInitializerExpression (cyclomatic 32) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1458— NodesVisitor.VisitInitializerExpression has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertForToSimpleForNext (cyclomatic 32) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:225— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertForToSimpleForNext has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitCastExpression (cyclomatic 31) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1124— NodesVisitor.VisitCastExpression has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.ConvertBaseList (cyclomatic 31) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:188— NodesVisitor.ConvertBaseList has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertTypeTupleToTypeStrings (cyclomatic 30) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:469— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertTypeTupleToTypeStrings has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ThemeSupport.SetLightMode (cyclomatic 29) CSharpToVB/ColorModeSupport/ThemeSupport.vb:121— ThemeSupport.SetLightMode has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitLocalFunctionStatement (cyclomatic 28) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1423— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitLocalFunctionStatement has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ThemeSupport.SetDarkMode (cyclomatic 27) CSharpToVB/ColorModeSupport/ThemeSupport.vb:7— ThemeSupport.SetDarkMode has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.ConvertAndSplitAttributes (cyclomatic 27) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:191— NodesVisitor.ConvertAndSplitAttributes has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.ConvertAndModifyTokenTrivia (cyclomatic 27) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:173— SyntaxTokenExtensions.ConvertAndModifyTokenTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.ProcessDirectoryAsync (cyclomatic 26) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.vb:50— ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.ProcessDirectoryAsync has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.WillConvertToFor (cyclomatic 26) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:748— MethodBodyVisitor.WillConvertToFor has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
AttributeAndModifierSupport.ConvertModifiers (cyclomatic 26) CodeConverter/Utilities/AttributeAndModifierSupport.vb:162— AttributeAndModifierSupport.ConvertModifiers has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitSwitchExpression (cyclomatic 24) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:619— NodesVisitor.VisitSwitchExpression has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitIndexerDeclaration (cyclomatic 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:614— NodesVisitor.VisitIndexerDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSwitchSection (cyclomatic 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:564— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSwitchSection has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitIfStatement (cyclomatic 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1264— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitIfStatement has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.FilterTrailingTrivia (cyclomatic 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:96— NodesVisitor.FilterTrailingTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitEnumDeclaration (cyclomatic 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:590— NodesVisitor.VisitEnumDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectOrSolutionAsync (cyclomatic 22) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessProjectUtilities.vb:211— ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectOrSolutionAsync has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitForEachStatement (cyclomatic 22) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:999— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitForEachStatement has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.FilterLeadingTrivia (cyclomatic 22) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:34— NodesVisitor.FilterLeadingTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_SizeAndPosition (cyclomatic 21) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:548— LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_SizeAndPosition has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitAttributeArgumentList (cyclomatic 21) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/AttributesVisitor.vb:40— NodesVisitor.VisitAttributeArgumentList has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.MakeAssignmentStatement (cyclomatic 21) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:346— NodesVisitor.MakeAssignmentStatement has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveDirectiveTrivia (cyclomatic 21) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:295— SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveDirectiveTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitMemberAccessExpression (cyclomatic 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1800— NodesVisitor.VisitMemberAccessExpression has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitParenthesizedExpression (cyclomatic 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1957— NodesVisitor.VisitParenthesizedExpression has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitTupleExpression (cyclomatic 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:2201— NodesVisitor.VisitTupleExpression has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertBlock (cyclomatic 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:117— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertBlock has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ProcessFileUtilities.ProcessFileAsync (cyclomatic 19) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessFileUtilities.vb:143— ProcessFileUtilities.ProcessFileAsync has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitInvocationExpression (cyclomatic 19) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1611— NodesVisitor.VisitInvocationExpression has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitVariableDeclaration (cyclomatic 19) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1771— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitVariableDeclaration has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenLeadingTrivia (cyclomatic 19) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:37— SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenLeadingTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
VariableDeclarationExtensions.WithModifiedNodeTrailingTrivia (cyclomatic 19) CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:60— VariableDeclarationExtensions.WithModifiedNodeTrailingTrivia has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
Form1.Form1_Load (cyclomatic 18) CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb:232— Form1.Form1_Load has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitIsPatternExpression (cyclomatic 18) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/PatternVisitor.vb:50— NodesVisitor.VisitIsPatternExpression has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
StatementMarker.GetStatementWithIssues (cyclomatic 18) CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:293— StatementMarker.GetStatementWithIssues has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxNormalizer.VisitToken (cyclomatic 18) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:1425— SyntaxNormalizer.VisitToken has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsLineBreakBetween (cyclomatic 19) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertISymbolToType (cyclomatic 18) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:135— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertISymbolToType has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This is NOT this file's highest cyclomatic complexity: TypeConverterSupport.ConvertSimpleTypeToType (cyclomatic 20) is higher and carries no row of its own — it was excluded as a flat dispatcher (a long switch/match over independent cases: many branches, almost no nesting), which this dimension does not treat as a refactor obligation. It is named here so the ranking you see in this file is not mistaken for the whole of it; the excluded method is counted neither in this dimension's figures nor in its score.
TargetFrameworkUtilities.GetAllFrameworkVersions (cyclomatic 17) CSharpToVB/Utilities/TargetFrameworkUtilities.vb:80— TargetFrameworkUtilities.GetAllFrameworkVersions has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitSingleVariableDesignation (cyclomatic 17) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DesignnationVisitor.vb:51— NodesVisitor.VisitSingleVariableDesignation has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.GenerateSafeVbToken (cyclomatic 17) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:235— NodesVisitor.GenerateSafeVbToken has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveExtraEol (cyclomatic 17) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:345— SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveExtraEol has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
ColorizeSupport.FilterOutTopLevelStatementCode (cyclomatic 16) CSharpToVB/ClassificationSupport/ColorizeSupport.vb:12— ColorizeSupport.FilterOutTopLevelStatementCode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
FilePathExtensions.GetFileCount (cyclomatic 16) CSharpToVB/Extensions/FilePathExtensions.vb:58— FilePathExtensions.GetFileCount has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
NodesVisitor.VisitAnonymousObjectCreationExpression (cyclomatic 16) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:472— NodesVisitor.VisitAnonymousObjectCreationExpression has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
BlockExtensions.GetEventBodyStatements (cyclomatic 16) CodeConverter/Extensions/BlockExtensions.vb:41— BlockExtensions.GetEventBodyStatements has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.RemoveExtraLeadingEol (cyclomatic 16) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:248— SyntaxNodeExtensions.RemoveExtraLeadingEol has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
TextFieldParser.GetLongPath (cyclomatic 16) csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:707— TextFieldParser.GetLongPath has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table.
HackComment CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/AttributesVisitor.vb:29— ' HACK for VB Error — a workaround marked in source: record what it is compensating for and what would allow its removal (the upstream fix, the API it is waiting on, the invariant it restores), so the next reader can judge whether it is still needed rather than rediscovering why it is there.
ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile (cognitive 372) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb:205— ConvertProjectFileUtilities.ConvertProjectFile has cognitive complexity 372 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression (cognitive 243) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:566— NodesVisitor.VisitAssignmentExpression has cognitive complexity 243 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration (cognitive 198) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:711— NodesVisitor.VisitMethodDeclaration has cognitive complexity 198 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ConvertLiteralSupport.GetLiteralExpression (cognitive 167) CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:129— ConvertLiteralSupport.GetLiteralExpression has cognitive complexity 167 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.WithModifiedTokenTrivia (cognitive 139) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:477— SyntaxTokenExtensions.WithModifiedTokenTrivia has cognitive complexity 139 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitCompilationUnit (cognitive 130) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:118— NodesVisitor.VisitCompilationUnit has cognitive complexity 130 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitParameter (cognitive 129) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ParametersVisitor.vb:60— NodesVisitor.VisitParameter has cognitive complexity 129 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ConvertTriviaList (cognitive 116) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb:174— SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ConvertTriviaList has cognitive complexity 116 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitClassDeclaration (cognitive 112) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:325— NodesVisitor.VisitClassDeclaration has cognitive complexity 112 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertToType (cognitive 111) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:310— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertToType has cognitive complexity 111 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.ConvertAndSplitAttributes (cognitive 109) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:191— NodesVisitor.ConvertAndSplitAttributes has cognitive complexity 109 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNormalizer.RewriteTrivia (cognitive 108) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:540— SyntaxNormalizer.RewriteTrivia has cognitive complexity 108 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.ConvertSolutionFile (cognitive 102) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:115— ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.ConvertSolutionFile has cognitive complexity 102 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitPropertyDeclaration (cognitive 95) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:1113— NodesVisitor.VisitPropertyDeclaration has cognitive complexity 95 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustNodeTrivia (cognitive 93) CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:30— LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustNodeTrivia has cognitive complexity 93 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleExpression (cognitive 87) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:407— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleExpression has cognitive complexity 87 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.ConvertBaseList (cognitive 87) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:188— NodesVisitor.ConvertBaseList has cognitive complexity 87 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitIdentifierName (cognitive 78) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:342— NodesVisitor.VisitIdentifierName has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
VariableDeclarationExtensions.RemodelVariableDeclaration (cognitive 78) CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:144— VariableDeclarationExtensions.RemodelVariableDeclaration has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.AdjustExpressionTrivia (cognitive 77) CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:26— ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.AdjustExpressionTrivia has cognitive complexity 77 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
StatementExtensions.RestructureAttributesAndModifiers (cognitive 76) CodeConverter/Extensions/StatementExtensions.vb:136— StatementExtensions.RestructureAttributesAndModifiers has cognitive complexity 76 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitBinaryExpression (cognitive 75) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:933— NodesVisitor.VisitBinaryExpression has cognitive complexity 75 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsSeparator (cognitive 73) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:191— SyntaxNormalizer.NeedsSeparator has cognitive complexity 73 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.WithTrailingEol (cognitive 72) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:486— SyntaxNodeExtensions.WithTrailingEol has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LineNumbersForRichTextBox.OnPaint (cognitive 69) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:793— LineNumbersForRichTextBox.OnPaint has cognitive complexity 69 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.ConvertLambdaExpression (cognitive 68) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:108— NodesVisitor.ConvertLambdaExpression has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.ConvertAndModifyNodeTrivia (cognitive 64) CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:225— LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.ConvertAndModifyNodeTrivia has cognitive complexity 64 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertTypeTupleToTypeStrings (cognitive 60) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:469— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertTypeTupleToTypeStrings has cognitive complexity 60 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitForEachStatement (cognitive 59) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:999— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitForEachStatement has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitInitializerExpression (cognitive 58) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1458— NodesVisitor.VisitInitializerExpression has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitAttributeArgumentList (cognitive 57) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/AttributesVisitor.vb:40— NodesVisitor.VisitAttributeArgumentList has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitLiteralExpression (cognitive 54) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1677— NodesVisitor.VisitLiteralExpression has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ThemeSupport.SetLightMode (cognitive 53) CSharpToVB/ColorModeSupport/ThemeSupport.vb:121— ThemeSupport.SetLightMode has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitSwitchExpression (cognitive 53) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:619— NodesVisitor.VisitSwitchExpression has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.ConvertAndModifyTokenTrivia (cognitive 53) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:173— SyntaxTokenExtensions.ConvertAndModifyTokenTrivia has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectOrSolutionAsync (cognitive 52) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessProjectUtilities.vb:211— ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectOrSolutionAsync has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitSingleVariableDesignation (cognitive 52) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DesignnationVisitor.vb:51— NodesVisitor.VisitSingleVariableDesignation has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitLocalFunctionStatement (cognitive 51) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1423— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitLocalFunctionStatement has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
AttributeAndModifierSupport.ConvertModifiers (cognitive 51) CodeConverter/Utilities/AttributeAndModifierSupport.vb:162— AttributeAndModifierSupport.ConvertModifiers has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ProcessFileUtilities.ProcessFileAsync (cognitive 48) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessFileUtilities.vb:143— ProcessFileUtilities.ProcessFileAsync has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TextFieldParser.ParseDelimitedLine (cognitive 48) csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:1146— TextFieldParser.ParseDelimitedLine has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitTupleExpression (cognitive 47) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:2201— NodesVisitor.VisitTupleExpression has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitEnumDeclaration (cognitive 47) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:590— NodesVisitor.VisitEnumDeclaration has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ThemeSupport.SetDarkMode (cognitive 45) CSharpToVB/ColorModeSupport/ThemeSupport.vb:7— ThemeSupport.SetDarkMode has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertForToSimpleForNext (cognitive 45) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:225— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertForToSimpleForNext has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSwitchSection (cognitive 45) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:564— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSwitchSection has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_SizeAndPosition (cognitive 41) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:548— LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_SizeAndPosition has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.MakeAssignmentStatement (cognitive 41) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:346— NodesVisitor.MakeAssignmentStatement has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitVariableDeclaration (cognitive 41) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1771— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitVariableDeclaration has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.NeedEventHandlerList (cognitive 40) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:156— NodesVisitor.NeedEventHandlerList has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitIndexerDeclaration (cognitive 40) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:614— NodesVisitor.VisitIndexerDeclaration has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitArgument (cognitive 39) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ArgumentListVisitor.vb:41— NodesVisitor.VisitArgument has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.FilterTrailingTrivia (cognitive 38) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:96— NodesVisitor.FilterTrailingTrivia has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
VariableDeclarationExtensions.WithModifiedNodeTrailingTrivia (cognitive 38) CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:60— VariableDeclarationExtensions.WithModifiedNodeTrailingTrivia has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TextFieldParser.ReadNextLine (cognitive 38) csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:1353— TextFieldParser.ReadNextLine has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitAnonymousObjectCreationExpression (cognitive 35) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:472— NodesVisitor.VisitAnonymousObjectCreationExpression has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.WillConvertToFor (cognitive 35) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:748— MethodBodyVisitor.WillConvertToFor has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertISymbolToType (cognitive 35) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:135— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertISymbolToType has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.ProcessDirectoryAsync (cognitive 34) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.vb:50— ProcessDirectoriesUtilities.ProcessDirectoryAsync has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitIfStatement (cognitive 34) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1264— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitIfStatement has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
BlockExtensions.GetEventBodyStatements (cognitive 34) CodeConverter/Extensions/BlockExtensions.vb:41— BlockExtensions.GetEventBodyStatements has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TargetFrameworkUtilities.GetAllFrameworkVersions (cognitive 33) CSharpToVB/Utilities/TargetFrameworkUtilities.vb:80— TargetFrameworkUtilities.GetAllFrameworkVersions has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.FilterLeadingTrivia (cognitive 33) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:34— NodesVisitor.FilterLeadingTrivia has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
StatementMarker.GetStatementWithIssues (cognitive 32) CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:293— StatementMarker.GetStatementWithIssues has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitCastExpression (cognitive 31) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1124— NodesVisitor.VisitCastExpression has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertBlock (cognitive 30) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:117— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertBlock has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
AttributeAndModifierSupport.GetVisibilityKeyword (cognitive 30) CodeConverter/Utilities/AttributeAndModifierSupport.vb:49— AttributeAndModifierSupport.GetVisibilityKeyword has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitInvocationExpression (cognitive 29) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1611— NodesVisitor.VisitInvocationExpression has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitUsingDirective (cognitive 29) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:874— NodesVisitor.VisitUsingDirective has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNavigator.GetNextToken (cognitive 29) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNavigator.vb:171— SyntaxNavigator.GetNextToken has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_VisibleLineNumberItems (cognitive 27) CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:637— LineNumbersForRichTextBox.Update_VisibleLineNumberItems has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitParenthesizedExpression (cognitive 27) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1957— NodesVisitor.VisitParenthesizedExpression has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
VariableDeclarationExtensions.DetermineTypeSyntax (cognitive 27) CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:16— VariableDeclarationExtensions.DetermineTypeSyntax has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
StatementMarker.IsDecedentOfAsyncMethod (cognitive 27) CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:374— StatementMarker.IsDecedentOfAsyncMethod has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustStatementLeadingTrivia (cognitive 26) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:82— SyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustStatementLeadingTrivia has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
Form1.Form1_Load (cognitive 25) CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb:232— Form1.Form1_Load has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.GetScopingBlock (cognitive 25) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:41— NodesVisitor.GetScopingBlock has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleBlock (cognitive 24) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:348— MethodBodyVisitor.ConvertSingleBlock has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitBlock (cognitive 24) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:824— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitBlock has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NamedTypeSymbolExtensions.WhereAsArray (cognitive 24) CodeConverter/Extensions/NamedTypeSymbolExtensions.vb:248— NamedTypeSymbolExtensions.WhereAsArray has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustMergedStatementTrailingTrivia (cognitive 24) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:23— SyntaxNodeExtensions.AdjustMergedStatementTrailingTrivia has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNavigator.GetNextToken (cognitive 24) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNavigator.vb:131— SyntaxNavigator.GetNextToken has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
QuoteDelimitedFieldBuilder.BuildField (cognitive 24) csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:128— QuoteDelimitedFieldBuilder.BuildField has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectAsync (cognitive 23) CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessProjectUtilities.vb:92— ProcessProjectUtilities.ProcessProjectAsync has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitMemberAccessExpression (cognitive 23) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1800— NodesVisitor.VisitMemberAccessExpression has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TextFieldParser.ValidateReadyToRead (cognitive 23) csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:1586— TextFieldParser.ValidateReadyToRead has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
BrowserUtilities.CheckForUpdatesAsync (cognitive 22) CSharpToVB/Utilities/BrowserUtilities.vb:65— BrowserUtilities.CheckForUpdatesAsync has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.DetermineType (cognitive 22) CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:179— ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.DetermineType has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveExtraEol (cognitive 22) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:345— SyntaxTokenExtensions.RemoveExtraEol has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.GetSymbolTableEntry (cognitive 21) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:114— NodesVisitor.GetSymbolTableEntry has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitRecordDeclaration (cognitive 21) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:342— NodesVisitor.VisitRecordDeclaration has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
RangeSupport.AdjustAdditiveSpans (cognitive 20) CSharpToVB/ClassificationSupport/RangeSupport.vb:13— RangeSupport.AdjustAdditiveSpans has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitConstructorDeclaration (cognitive 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:330— NodesVisitor.VisitConstructorDeclaration has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitFieldDeclaration (cognitive 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:560— NodesVisitor.VisitFieldDeclaration has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitVariableDeclarator (cognitive 20) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:770— NodesVisitor.VisitVariableDeclarator has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.GetNamespaceSymbols (cognitive 20) CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:448— LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.GetNamespaceSymbols has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNormalizer.VisitToken (cognitive 20) CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:1425— SyntaxNormalizer.VisitToken has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ColorizeSupport.Colorize (cognitive 19) CSharpToVB/ClassificationSupport/ColorizeSupport.vb:80— ColorizeSupport.Colorize has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ComboBoxEx.WndProc (cognitive 19) CSharpToVB/Controls/ComboBoxEx.vb:99— ComboBoxEx.WndProc has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitElementAccessExpression (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1356— NodesVisitor.VisitElementAccessExpression has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitTryStatement (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1666— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitTryStatement has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.GenerateSafeVbToken (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:235— NodesVisitor.GenerateSafeVbToken has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxNodeExtensions.RemoveExtraLeadingEol (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:248— SyntaxNodeExtensions.RemoveExtraLeadingEol has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenLeadingTrivia (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:37— SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenLeadingTrivia has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
StatementMarker.FlagUnsupportedStatements (cognitive 19) CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:219— StatementMarker.FlagUnsupportedStatements has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ContainsCommentOrDirectiveTrivia (cognitive 18) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb:60— SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.ContainsCommentOrDirectiveTrivia has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
StatementMarker.ReplaceStatementsWithMarkedStatements (cognitive 18) CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:475— StatementMarker.ReplaceStatementsWithMarkedStatements has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TriviaListSupport.TranslateTokenList (cognitive 18) CodeConverter/Utilities/TriviaListSupport.vb:106— TriviaListSupport.TranslateTokenList has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
FilePathExtensions.GetFileCount (cognitive 17) CSharpToVB/Extensions/FilePathExtensions.vb:58— FilePathExtensions.GetFileCount has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitImplicitArrayCreationExpression (cognitive 17) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1411— NodesVisitor.VisitImplicitArrayCreationExpression has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitIsPatternExpression (cognitive 17) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/PatternVisitor.vb:50— NodesVisitor.VisitIsPatternExpression has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenTrailingTrivia (cognitive 17) CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:88— SyntaxTokenExtensions.AdjustTokenTrailingTrivia has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitObjectCreationExpression (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1904— NodesVisitor.VisitObjectCreationExpression has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitPostfixUnaryExpression (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:2049— NodesVisitor.VisitPostfixUnaryExpression has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
NodesVisitor.VisitPrefixUnaryExpression (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:2110— NodesVisitor.VisitPrefixUnaryExpression has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
MethodBodyVisitor.VisitContinueStatement (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:917— MethodBodyVisitor.VisitContinueStatement has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.GetExpressionBodyStatements (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:216— ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.GetExpressionBodyStatements has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
TypeConverterSupport.ConvertITypeSymbolToType (cognitive 16) CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:199— TypeConverterSupport.ConvertITypeSymbolToType has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function.
Change coupling: Form1.vb ↔ ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb:1— `CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb` and `CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb` change together 54% of the time (7 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in different directories, but in this ecosystem the namespace is declared in the FILE, not by the folder — so the two may well share one namespace and reference each other with no import for this pass to see. Read the pair before acting: if one derives from or overrides the other, the dependency is explicit in the type declaration and the co-change is definitional; if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE and the thing to add is a comment saying so; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if none of these holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 7 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `e826c1e6` Add support for Code Colorization on Paste, handle abrupt exit better.; `b3559b53` More Compatibility fixes with Core 5 (at that commit the file was still `CSharpToVB/Form1.vb`); `b9ef1263` Clean up #If's (at that commit the file was still `CSharpToVB/Form1.vb`) — run `git show` on any of them.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:300— CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:300-310 | CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:797-807 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Low cohesion: NodesVisitor (LCOM4 45) CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ArgumentListVisitor.vb:16— NodesVisitor's methods fall into 45 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable — your repository's bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 45 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected — and which would otherwise dominate this list — are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting.
SC1 · Supply-chain hygiene· NuGet dependencies are not locked · ×1
NuGet dependencies are not locked — No packages.lock.json and no central package management — restores aren't reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable <RestorePackagesWithLockFile>true</RestorePackagesWithLockFile> (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory — never scored.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NodesVisitor.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file csvGenerator/TextFieldParser.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamespaceVisitor.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Utilities/SyntaxNormalizer.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Forms/Form1.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Controls/LineNumbersForRichTextBox.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTokenExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertProjectFileUtilities.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/NamesVisitor.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/SyntaxTriviaListExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Utilities/TypeConverterSupport.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Utilities/VisualBasicSyntaxFactory.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/LanguageSyntaxNodeExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Utilities/StatementMarkerSupport.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ParametersVisitor.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/StatementExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Utilities/ConvertLiteralSupport.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Utilities/ConvertSolutionFileUtilities.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessProjectUtilities.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CSharpToVB/Utilities/ProcessFileUtilities.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/VariableDeclarationExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/NamedTypeSymbolExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/Extensions/ExpressionSyntaxExtensions.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
Orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/XMLVisitor.vb:1— No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for.
+ 51 more in this group — see findings.md.
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Most significant orphaned file · ×3
Most significant orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/ExpressionVisitor.vb:1— One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Most significant orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/MethodBodyVisitor.vb:1— One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Most significant orphaned file CodeConverter/CSharpToVBConverter/CSharpToVBVisitors/DeclarationVisitor.vb:1— One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge — ranked by size weighted by the file's role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites.
Documentation: no architecture or design documentation — The document does not mention any architecture or design documentation for the converter. Add a short 'Architecture' section describing how input is read, converted, and compiled, or link to an architecture doc if one exists.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
Dormant codebase — 79 of 79 significant files have no living knowledge — the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 79 separate risks. Counted over 79 of the 118 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
M2 · Architecture documentation· No architecture diagram/doc · ×1
No architecture diagram/doc — No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named `architecture` or `design` in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape — no `## Architecture` heading, no "architecture overview"/"high-level design" phrasing, no "the architecture is …" introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document — not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down.
No src/ separation — Production code isn't grouped under a src/ folder — it's spread across several top-level directories, so there's no one place that says 'this is the product'.
No changelog — No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file — what shipped when isn't easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)
Nullable reference types not enabled everywhere — 0/1 NRT-eligible project(s) enable <Nullable>enable</Nullable> (projects targeting a pre-C#-8 framework are excluded — NRTs aren't available there). NRTs catch a whole class of null-deref bugs at compile time.
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that.
disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md/.markdown/.rst/.txt at root or under .github/.forgejo/.gitea/docs, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
none (no readable dependency manifest): not applicable — Not scored — no dependency manifest in a supported ecosystem was read for this repository. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository is free of vulnerable dependencies (a Python pyproject.toml/requirements.txt (pip/uv/Poetry), a Swift Package.swift/Package.resolved, a Cargo manifest, a Go module (go.mod/go.sum), a Gradle version catalogue, a Maven POM, an sbt build (build.sbt), composer.json, package.json, a Dart pubspec.yaml, an Elixir mix.exs/mix.lock (Hex), a rebar.config / erlang.mk DEPS (Hex), a Ruby Gemfile/Gemfile.lock or .gemspec (Bundler/RubyGems) — not scanned yet).
0
—
Run 01a160e2-f311-71cf-a14b-d1dc9be53116 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 5 · Warnings: 301 · Recommendations: 89 · Info: 1 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 21-10-2026 @ 23:54 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.