{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Form1.BackgroundWorker2_DoWork (cyclomatic 35): Form1.BackgroundWorker2_DoWork has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce81f06c314a422eb0a25f9b433c77d4340104b08a7fc01d621d6b7a54355e05"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Form1.ApplyXLATheme (cyclomatic 19): Form1.ApplyXLATheme has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"426cedd43eb8959450366567b86dc77c65b3458d8cfe63e56a57cf91dc990071"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Codedom.LoaderCompiler (cyclomatic 16): Codedom.LoaderCompiler has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b8c6634c5acb8360f2aa8f48ef2f20ed4902ae17971587b7bb1255adf38094f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Form1.BackgroundWorker2_DoWork (cognitive 73): Form1.BackgroundWorker2_DoWork has cognitive complexity 73 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb holds 3 of the 6 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 65 of the 86 points over it (76%), 4.1\u00D7 the next-largest file (SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb at 16). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e36168cef1b06322427431a02bca0714b6ec23d3704b8689a5ca7a6c72fd03ed"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MephTabcontrol.OnPaint (cognitive 31): MephTabcontrol.OnPaint has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":989}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5d56d8ac58d7c51903d7ebce6a15a629da490a47ba1736aa00cdfc5294a5cec"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Form1.ApplyXLATheme (cognitive 21): Form1.ApplyXLATheme has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb holds 3 of the 6 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 65 of the 86 points over it (76%), 4.1\u00D7 the next-largest file (SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb at 16). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b645a451a0e760078048b89fdaee8027f91482cda3b21efa640744be73f60e80"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Codedom.LoaderCompiler (cognitive 19): Codedom.LoaderCompiler has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84d3d00b7d4e687fa64ef3c3fc8623bbf87ceaf5e944c01a35de8b9aeab09d80"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Codedom.ReplaceGlobals (cognitive 16): Codedom.ReplaceGlobals has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":282}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ce6c61fd2f9138704015bf254bbbf5fba214200dde19db2c7b6a27ea64d494a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Form1.btnBuild_Click (cognitive 16): Form1.btnBuild_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb holds 3 of the 6 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 65 of the 86 points over it (76%), 4.1\u00D7 the next-largest file (SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb at 16). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fa2963ab515317f81dc087b434c1c4fd12ebb7592f220b01b4c76e35a4119e1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1030 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 530 over it, 2.06\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"982b6d3ede511e063973152adeedbf2f487b0964e49b0bec42343d0ce797ae80"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: Form1: ClassTooLong \u2014 533 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 28 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 133 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97626561c835f958fece5ab7d925a24ed98a53112a6d5e4ae20368b856e9f928"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Form1.BackgroundWorker2_DoWork: MethodTooLong \u2014 BackgroundWorker2_DoWork runs 122 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aed263151e83b6f4cb9e61aa7489b45538762eac3694baad49a5869887865bf8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 536 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1540c7bab1d1a7cf717cc1330f7a8df10db07835f45579d664fce98bed8c47af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (9 corresponding lines): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:34-42 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:959-967 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 9 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"babf9c83e64cfa7736704d3ae8bf753cc9ac7ec880a93290f35ab982c8fedb04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:808-835 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:1143-1170 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":808}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb758a5efac6b3a19912d0f449c29c56f9e313e6e5ab1d6415add535a95ebd23"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:1021-1035 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:1043-1056 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1021}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e6a973b5b4f3ff0ce50dac301e06758d099fc153696731f46f6e336fd796ce9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:255-264 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:309-319 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e7ba09b38af88327d42054b7ea560a6c51887941e5e3a8f517e134399f9132d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb:528-533 | SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb:552-557 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":528}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b159bb709ab1543876f1bd2dd173ec4c3b47877967b2a1a26ee5251f27bccd9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:879-884 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:886-891 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":879}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"edb9879e1423003545ae432ba9bb5c69ab8477fa2b608c9578dc3b16c086d090"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:34-38 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:959-963 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d749ba350d24254b2c1dfa236e931984eb3a0b9d7c2741d2b55fdf853f5eadef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:24-31 | SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb:949-956 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5144dbf97e1e1bb9c6189e9259867d72296f5c02b76aa4649d9973303622448"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MephCheckBox (LCOM4 5): MephCheckBox\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1071}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a21b493c1e46fb0cae12ec3171e79e02f00a368f7ddc5fd0ef5a3993ec9feee"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Form1 (LCOM4 4): Form1\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b49fab3370710fdd81a83ed1e5ed4ea668b2abec7c7a843a3117a45f5798629c"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MephToggleSwitch (LCOM4 4): MephToggleSwitch\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":339}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cffdb9f88b6422cc00a920ca53da326af7b855a03f6788ddaec533edd51a9d8"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: MephRadioButton (LCOM4 4): MephRadioButton\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":719}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e04b00be28e6946a9e5762d2eeb5796100ba32367cb84e645a678cad666da55"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 1 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41d1095b4c58c51de3209a08f92ad730e7db5d26f5948eff96fd66dd6e70159c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af7313b1d8d9d8ba05f78a58306a991f2c9b294bd60347eebe66a334974cdfdf"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15708636bab3505bbc1eebbf283675201b2b41c3ec1bf7244a85920af7256ee6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f8819f0cdbc13ae29a5e1255fef3b24b59f59250eea1c8b4916a964b41cb1cc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"617e5ca50c7de78e3e8a94e3e346ff4b92a85346659dffd63ff4df40a2efdae0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b363cedcb57a7d7ad3d298a27b48a8074ea8f3c766e1282b0eedb3e81e25718"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":288}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0376fa2c3dcb8d6e9a93863b84e5e43fe66bc4c15b5ed09571d665544a99f787"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":560}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6cbe4a66cd78f1a07d0e127a81133048d59d504e8357888809318027fe619bdd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":576}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8cd115216a65035589c5631fe114b61aff36dc7c3d453d040f558693fdbac83b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":591}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"735f486c066dc18e3a94414292f635fb3fd8064f3b80e6c1095e4984e989e7ad"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":850}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1084157552b82999d37d9bb092bf89af8f1e5e5303861ea4b63c66b2dc3c9832"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":874}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce34130355c67c197ab6e3b4dc6aff8856d399be0118a77bf11dacc0635ceea3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":939}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f2f8d8c9449f181aa411cfda85b1a1f61927f5afb67a421b02fdb97e43a16a5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":993}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b26f977d8b00060362d6e06fa2868855d18bf36f4f875206ca3032c238e2b44"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"OnErrorResumeSwallow: On Error Resume Next silently swallows every runtime error until the enclosing method returns \u2014 scope it with a paired \u0060On Error GoTo 0\u0060 and check \u0060Err.Number\u0060, or convert to a \u0060Try\u2026Catch\u0060."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Form1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":617}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66c878c4510b1da2b9f5e80b5a337e4540a545a2f4cb81a8be22d832265d80b9"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: The only runnable code shown is a shell block for downloading binaries and donating; no actual build or run commands are present. Add install/build steps: how to clone the repo, add the binary path to PATH, and run the miner."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13a2672524f934f9b6c0862e3496281177ed2c936ab351d33452260a3519b67c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-22","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Theme.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7036b20b4f253d79410618ed475c0c13ec5c0b4a8a7407b328c6c569256debb4"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"error","message":{"text":"Orphaned knowledge: No living knowledge remains for this large file \u2014 its last meaningful change has decayed away; if it breaks, no one currently understands it. Schedule a read-through / add characterisation tests before it bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SilentXMRMiner/Codedom.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2aedbac43ac1a143ca7503b14fac6692206b51bc607f7b4186a16f6c01863c1"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it all sits under SilentXMRMiner/ alongside the root build files, so the conventional src/ boundary between the product and its tooling isn\u0027t drawn."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims a \u0027Frankenstein monster\u0027 Frankenstein build but the evidence shows only one project (Silent XMR Miner Builder) with no sign of a Frankenstein merge \u2014 searched for: \u0060Frankenstein\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c63863efe46b811527cd96594db44d3f3a355e50fc1cca16270b212e905840c"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: claims Stealth injection via explorer.exe/conhost.exe svchost hiding but there is no such component in the evidence \u2014 reported by the model that read the README against this repository; no term search was run for this one, so nothing here has been checked against the tree. Treat it as a reading to confirm, not as a measured contradiction: verify it against the code before acting on it, and if the footprint it describes does exist, this row is wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d3aa4bf4ffb45d802fd752126a0edf9d5e5fc2ad6e4995665f72d2f0522b54e"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-22","guid":"b68d9ca7-bdde-d057-a6cc-9f8b1e739552","name":"CWE-22","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-22"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":1,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}