{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D18","name":"Solution Shape","shortDescription":{"text":"Solution Shape"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D18"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D23","name":"Boundary Type-Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Boundary Type-Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D23"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cyclomatic 36): Module1.Main has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d09342cc7361b95f77e41171fbbd1b45fe5c03383ed27b6d810480bdfa0a15c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cyclomatic 35): Module1.Main has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c961744ef6dcbeedfb68f27b6d83fc9bc54a757482c4b304caee7a773904eb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.Main (cyclomatic 35): UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.Main has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"770c0cd14753429818d90b44a378607690b51924e941ab3b4d2cbfd2aab972f7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cyclomatic 34): Module1.Main has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15936e8aab138c16ebc09d08606d6382d32e3732554a62b4d120e0645baf83f0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CreateFlatPattern.Main (cyclomatic 30): CreateFlatPattern.Main has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"584b415a7477cbd23cb5a31dc8b6e06263a793c84a3a1af39e2a186f57fc7df0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cyclomatic 22): Module1.Main has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AddRemoveCustomProperties/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acb66f0f7d47a5822f96e9b0f2558b1c66db6a9e4ab928434ae0be56a1c06f13"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.GetProgramSettings (cyclomatic 20): Module1.GetProgramSettings has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48a3bac911478b928388a09708d52eceed5510cb89365e111daf0ca6fc80acde"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.Main (cognitive 137): UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.Main has cognitive complexity 137 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"300d3eaeff05eb25dd3fde9ad0c1a563687f59ae85885f37a8edabd1dbefcb34"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 116): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 116 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11c49074cd84ce8506d6a7f6cc3945dbf3824fa95884a10b5ad8490fef8a2d3e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 86): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 86 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0598d23f37dbd5fabb68b35aea0fb44738cb82b96a18e0ab6a721aa8b8a4e5c4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 82): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 82 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78220553dd1e53951e8ac45a02d0a1e4a68caaf6061a56642a9d8ded9e5e752d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 67): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 67 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AddRemoveCustomProperties/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":4}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0308eb91b61ba8c29b539c6a581506a1e458f6ee2f8b1f2c0477a2e194b566a8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CreateFlatPattern.Main (cognitive 63): CreateFlatPattern.Main has cognitive complexity 63 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5603b0ac5eec2c9eafdec29372b584b70c4ab9ec1256f511c6829e2a1d50737"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.GetOccurrences (cognitive 40): Module1.GetOccurrences has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8df997138def98e1110c4bc5926b3f9640aac334ca4e348ad416cf35533c33f1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.PopulateProps (cognitive 28): Module1.PopulateProps has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fe3bb7b79dc01775f6ca0711c71df90591a84d2117297e27cc08edc3c445951"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 24): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":5}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a671d66c42e0eb3e90c68512e70fd986a96299799b1d6c3f30aa35b0c32ed0d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.GetProgramSettings (cognitive 21): Module1.GetProgramSettings has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d60c711517842e8895a7b6309dd6e4091210cf82261a4d54bbad7b34e67f86f4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Module1.Main (cognitive 19): Module1.Main has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FitIsoView/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b0800df601700fdd4b40069d84a0a9eafa54063428656a1a06b5d53971c03d0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Module1.Main: MethodTooLong \u2014 Main runs 162 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.62\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e7110a17639c7d27555f203009e5e39f1940ecb8876d5b481f6b5ce9268f37b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.Main: MethodTooLong \u2014 Main runs 146 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 46 over it, 1.46\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a43a2d579cd596dce9bad058b7a1599349e2110c7b094357a136c6b2a8130e4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Module1.Main: MethodTooLong \u2014 Main runs 141 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 41 over it, 1.41\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":9}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e43958f8cf327a53f3e00d3ce1e5ad6c50c0e55c3df8cc7865d2a07b5075ca0a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CreateFlatPattern.Main: MethodTooLong \u2014 Main runs 135 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 35 over it, 1.35\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":12}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8e6300daa57e2d4a05ba1f4d238c55405ee655f20b171b896bd3793549f094f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Module1.Main: MethodTooLong \u2014 Main runs 135 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 35 over it, 1.35\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4bb2e87452b8b78820616896ef6afc3c910dd19f324ce5350675478e40ed4387"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb:318-333 | FitIsoView/Module1.vb:105-120 | ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb:336-351 | SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/Program.vb:127-142 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":318}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e10b1e03abd1f152fa1199718d9e836e67892fff2ff282c2aa33ea8eed1bd1fb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:132-166 | QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:287-323 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:203-238 | UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb:212-247 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc273b0b8f66eac714b88f2945abf7f75799117fd092bcfcd2a52f55226190dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36\u201337 lines \u00D7 3): QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:287-323 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:203-238 | UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb:212-247 \u2014 \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb\u0060 and \u0060ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":287}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44734b80d9a3291760d2c5dd5ae638f46de4125bf0b02f4cb255cf8fda18d551"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 3): CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb:275-302 | ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb:293-320 | SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/Program.vb:84-111 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":275}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a35249903fd7c91dbb7a8ee40aad9cdeec25a52035e8b2d857a896c6ebd2c1e8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201324 lines \u00D7 3): QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:227-249 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:271-294 | UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb:277-300 \u2014 \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb\u0060 and \u0060ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"daf5c02fb8f115d95364235ce70ce7befb233c1a7fcd2abc8d02b72c87524c4e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (24 lines \u00D7 3): CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:139-162 | QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:294-317 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:210-233 \u2014 \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb\u0060 and \u0060ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:319\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060, \u0060Format\u0060 and \u0060CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:163\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e4a66b6e2bc7b63f90de349f2e42bb1f0d98c4ea9d991ef1b369e70b5dfc11e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/MarshalHelper.vb:13-33 | SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/MarshalHelper.vb:13-33 \u2014 \u0060CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/MarshalHelper.vb\u0060 and \u0060SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/MarshalHelper.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 1 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 21 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/MarshalHelper.vb"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1a48175f08c067bb41fa8e766b69563689fa392e75ac639f0cedd497f5ce12e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 4): CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb:318-333 | FitIsoView/Module1.vb:105-120 | ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb:336-351 | SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/Program.vb:127-142 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 4 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":318}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2983922900aba151382a08279028c261743ad0857802ddb6890f3373fb1a5a3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:148-162 | QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:303-317 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:219-233 | UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate/UpdatePartsListStyleFromTemplate.vb:228-242 \u2014 \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb\u0060 and \u0060ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:319\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060, \u0060Format\u0060 and \u0060CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:163\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c2fae62e8d0a28c0bad7b5521968f0512b93b2edfed1c8787894d64eaac893e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb:30-42 | ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb:51-63 \u2014 \u0060QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb\u0060 and \u0060ReplaceOLELinks/Module1.vb\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 113 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"QtyFromAssy/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":30}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3ef9f4d645a2e04596c517e67ff1be0e2b5185b18e9b300ceae1f18b5f6169a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 7): AddRemoveCustomProperties/Module1.vb:157-162 | CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb:122-127 | CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb:308-313 | FitIsoView/Module1.vb:94-99 | RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb:392-397 | ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb:326-331 | SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/Program.vb:117-122 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 7 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 7 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AddRemoveCustomProperties/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"230463d5a8f81e57262bcba0e2348317a064455dfcf3c19f68a4e8abe0061d43"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (xUnit, NUnit or MSTest) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AddRemoveCustomProperties/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61536fce2b75fb36087bca7c2da169c9c5fc7b934d541adfbd07ccb2e554a60d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5188228e33d4b858c15a8443061145b2a5ef05ab0a41429ad741b23c4a72d011"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28d436d588722b22f3a149f3527025a0d06b9caa0b51cdd8cbe1639ffcd94c53"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CreateFlatPattern/CreateFlatPattern.vb"},"region":{"startLine":330}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85cb4ddeedd434ec85ce38a61299cfc8952f485b2d892dd526b19d063bbc50d2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"FitIsoView/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b048e1cee2cd0e2e04a83e2223140811dd11ef50df213c78906bf218ddfbc1d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":138}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd99a1471c20d05e5659698ba11a1869502a1ef6ecd05af7b891d35c56358296"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"RecognizeHoles/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":415}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df30ea8c36dcf64d3bcec572940f24bc8fbd6413f803a57c495fbbff0c9db7f2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReplaceBlocks/Module1.vb"},"region":{"startLine":348}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8702fe5dbd9fc70314f371889a68d7b1af6703b0c0e22e350bb15c057a1111b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SaveAndTogglePreviewGeometry/Program.vb"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af8fb5af26eb267dec1d2cb792ef4ecd059944bcd50b6ddf42031c65567e4514"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D44","level":"warning","message":{"text":"End-of-life runtime: .NET net6.0: CompareFlatAndModelVolumes/CompareFlatAndModelVolumes.vbproj declares .NET net6.0 as this project\u0027s target framework, and .NET 6 LTS, support ended 2024-11-12. An unsupported runtime receives no security patches, so every vulnerability disclosed in it since 2024-11-12 is present and unfixable without moving off it. This is a migration rather than an upgrade: there is no newer release of a runtime that has ended."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"833052aef8fed8fff4f2fedf55a392e3e58dc048b7b988c82a469d1d41453aa6"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s spread across several top-level directories, so there\u0027s no one place that says \u0027this is the product\u0027."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"Inconsistent root namespaces: Only 1/11 projects share a common root namespace \u2014 the code\u0027s module identity is inconsistent."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8031c9fb77ad97c2e4a8ddb29978f4bf30140d481913bd7fde8b5adbbb83ede"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NuGet dependencies are not locked: No packages.lock.json and no central package management \u2014 restores aren\u0027t reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable \u003CRestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003Etrue\u003C/RestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003E (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a97b4f69ccac509400ece7eedefb06d3ede0522cd4d8bcb5c068bea719545a6"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":0,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}}}]}