Public report — SolidEdgeHousekeeper, published 8 Aug 2026. Concrete security findings (CVE IDs, secret matches, dependency versions) are hidden in this version; ask the repo owner for the full report.
Watchdogby Canine Development 08-08-2026 @ 00:27 UTC Public
Code Health Audit

Rmcanany/SolidEdgeHousekeeper

no automated tests
35% Weak
CriticalWeakAdequateStrongExemplary
middle
Security 77% Adequate Code Health 73% Adequate Maturity 54% Adequate Architecture 41% Weak Readiness 17% Critical

— · 2 projects · weakest lens: Readiness (17%)

Grounded in facts. Every number here is computed, not narrated — reproducible, tool-backed, and traceable to a line of code. How to trust this ▸

31/34dimensions tool-verifieddeterministic · confidence 1.0 · 3 LLM-assisted, advisory
469findings with an exact file:lineof 476 — the remainder are repo-wide signals (a dimension-level measurement, not a single line); open any file:line and verify
34/90dimensions across the health lenses · 2 projects — wide & deep

Executive summary

Read through the Production lens — the standard calibration. *Green* means good enough to run in production. The score is absolute and comparable across repos.

rmcanany/SolidEdgeHousekeeper carries serious gaps (35%). Several issues below can materially affect correctness, security, or the cost of changing it — and propagate to everything that depends on it.

The area that most needs attention is Readiness (17%) — releases are harder to depend on — versioning, release notes and dependency hygiene are thin, so consumers can't easily tell what changed or trust an upgrade. Architecture (41%) is the next concern — the code resists change, so features cost more over time.

Leadership focus, highest impact first: CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR (CI/CD gates); ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across… (Observability); 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage (Code Coverage).

For scale: — (~0 production lines); rebuilding it from scratch would take roughly — (—). Approximate, ±~30%.

Code Health 73% Adequate · gated by D1, D2, D18 Architecture 41% Weak · gated by D26, AX5 Maturity 54% Adequate · gated by M2 Readiness 17% ⚠ Critical · gated by D8, D9, P1, P2, P3 Security 77% Adequate · gated by D28
How the score is built — each lens's share of the headline Width is the lens's weight in the worst-heaviest fold (the weakest area pulls hardest); colour is that lens's own band. A lens fixes the score in proportion to its width.
Readiness 17% · 47% weightArchitecture 41% · 26% weightMaturity 54% · 14% weightCode Health 73% · 8% weightSecurity 77% · 4% weight

Raise Readiness 17 → 70 (the Healthy floor) ⇒ headline 35 → ~53.

Code composition — where the lines go
Generated 100%
New since the last scan (52+)

52 finding(s) are new versus the previous scan (2026-08-03) — surfaced by this scheduled scan itself, no pull request required.

  • D1 · TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cyclomatic 16) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb
  • D2 · TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb
  • D3 · ClassTooLong: LinkFullNames My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (91 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (34 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) My Project/UCEditProperties.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (19 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (17 lines × 5) My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (14 lines × 6) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 5) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D4 · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/TaskPrint.vb
  • D17 · XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb
  • D17 · XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb
  • D17 · XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsPreferences.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb ↔ TaskSaveModelAs.vb My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: FormPropertyPicker.vb ↔ Form_Main.vb My Project/FormPropertyPicker.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: FormExpressionEditor.vb ↔ UtilsPowerShell.vb My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UCPropertyFilter.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: UCEditProperties.vb ↔ UCPropertyFilter.vb My Project/UCEditProperties.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsFileList.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UCEditProperties.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • D35 · Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsCommon.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb
  • P2 · No structured logging

A full-fidelity diff against the previous run's complete recorded findings — line-move tolerant: a finding that only shifted line counts as unchanged, only genuinely new titles/files surface here.

Top priorities

The highest-leverage moves; the full ranked list is in the Roadmap below.

1
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.
+16.7 pts · Low effort · Code Coverage
2
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.
+16.7 pts · Low effort · Test Distribution
3
Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
+18.9 pts · Medium effort · CI/CD gates

Diagnosis — what's actually going on

Highest-leverage move · Medium · Leverage
Of everything flagged, the best return on effort is: Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR. The rest can wait behind it.
Evidence: priority ranking: top of 5 ranked by impact/effort
→ Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.

At a glance — Code Health · 73% · Adequate · gated by D1, D2, D18

The Good
D4 · .NET / C# Code Duplication 9.0 GD1 · Repo Unfinished & placeholder code 10.0 X1 · Repo Async correctness 10.0 X3 · Repo Exception handling 10.0 X4 · Repo Structured logging 10.0
The Bad
D3 · .NET / C# God Classes 6.1 D17 · .NET / C# Explicit Debt 6.2
The Ugly
D1 · .NET / C# Cyclomatic Complexity 3.4 D2 · .NET / C# Cognitive Complexity 2.0 D18 · .NET / C# Solution Shape 2.0

At a glance — Architecture · 41% · Weak · gated by D26, AX5

The Good
D5 · .NET / C# Coupling 10.0
The Bad
D35 · .NET / C# Change Coupling 6.9
The Ugly
D6 · .NET / C# Cohesion (LCOM4) 4.2 D26 · .NET / C# Project Cohesion 0.0 AX5 · Repo Architecture & structure 3.0

At a glance — Maturity · 54% · Adequate · gated by M2

The Good
D15 · .NET / C# Churn × Complexity Hotspots 10.0 D16 · .NET / C# Bus Factor 10.0 D21 · .NET / C# Naming Consistency 10.0 D34 · .NET / C# Knowledge Freshness 10.0 M1 · Repo Documentation (README) 8.3 M4 · Repo Documentation accuracy 10.0
The Bad
M3 · Repo Folder & project structure 6.0
The Ugly
D19 · .NET / C# Documentation Quality 3.0 M2 · Repo Architecture documentation 0.0

At a glance — Readiness · 17% · Critical · gated by D8, D9, P1, P2, P3

The Good
D12 · .NET / C# Dependency Hygiene 10.0 D13 · .NET / C# Secret Scanning 10.0
The Ugly
D8 · .NET / C# Code Coverage 0.0 P1 · Repo CI/CD gates 0.0 P2 · Repo Observability 0.0 P3 · Repo Security & performance tooling 0.0

At a glance — Security · 77% · Adequate · gated by D28

The Good
D29 · .NET / C# Static Analysis (SAST) 10.0 D30 · .NET / C# Dependency Vulnerabilities 10.0
The Ugly
D28 · .NET / C# Secrets (history) 3.0

Security & Compliance — OWASP Top-10 mapping

Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).

OWASP categoryFindingsSeverity
A02:2021 — Cryptographic Failures1Medium

Roadmap

First, establish a continuous integration workflow to automatically build and test every change. Next, implement structured logging across all services to improve observability and debugging capabilities. Then, address the lack of automated tests by resolving the identified coverage gaps and ensuring tests are properly distributed. Finally, refactor the codebase to introduce clear architectural boundaries, such as separating features or layers, to improve maintainability.

Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.

Do thisHelpsEffortDimension
Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage.+16.7 ptsLowCode Coverage
Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution.+16.7 ptsLowTest Distribution
Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.+18.9 ptsMediumCI/CD gates
Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.+18.9 ptsMediumObservability
Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion.+4.6 ptsLowProject Cohesion
Introduce deliberate module boundaries — by feature (vertical slices) if your team prefers, or by layer (domain/application/infrastructure). Even splitting into a few cohesive projects with a clear dependency direction would help.+7.4 ptsMediumArchitecture & structure
Resolve the 1 No installation/run commands and no usage description exist in the… finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md.+3.5 ptsLowDocumentation Quality
Start an ADR log (docs/adr/) recording significant decisions and their rationale.+4.0 ptsMediumArchitecture documentation

File quality

Per-file score 0–10 — a quality signature. Of 66 files carrying findings, judged against the Production bar: 26% slop · 62% mixed · 12% near-clean.

FileScoreBandWorst signal
My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb1.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/Form_Main.vb1.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb1.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsCommon.vb1.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb1.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb1.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb1.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb1.9SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb2.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb2.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb2.4SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb2.7SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsSEApp.vb3.0SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb3.2SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskPrint.vb3.3SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb3.4SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsFileList.vb3.4SlopExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb4.6MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb4.6MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock
My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb4.6MixedExplicit Debt: EmptyCatchBlock

Methodology & how to trust this report

Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 31 of 34 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 3 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.6 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.

Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.

What we checked — 34 dimensions across the health lenses
D1D2D3D4D5D6D8D9D12D13D15D16D17D18D19D21D26D28D29D30D34D35AX5GD1M1M2M3M4P1P2P3X1X3X4

Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.

How to trust any code-health report — three questions
  1. Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 469 of 476 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
  2. Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
  3. Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.

This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.

Tools & methods

The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.

MethodBacksVersionEvaluator
Roslyn static analysisComplexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering5.3.0✓ deterministic
Native secret scannerHardcoded secrets / credentials1.0.0✓ deterministic
jscpdCode duplication—✓ deterministic
Coverage (coverlet / dotnet-coverage)Line & branch coverage10.0.301✓ deterministic
NuGet / dotnetOutdated, vulnerable & deprecated dependencies10.0.301✓ deterministic
git / LibGit2SharpChurn hotspots, knowledge concentration, history2.43.0 · 0.31.0✓ deterministic
gitleaks · semgrep · trivy · checkovSecrets in history, SAST, CVEs, IaC & container, PII / GDPR1.86.0 · 0.69.3✓ deterministic
LLM (sampled · advisory)Documentation quality, ADR conformance, naming — sampled over a bounded sample; advisory, never a deterministic measurementLocal LLM◐ LLM · sampled · advisory

Every finding is locatable in findings.md. Run 019fdec4-95d2-7bef-abc7-33cf5ec7f229.

The exact command behind every deep-scan dimension — tool, version, invocation and retained raw output — is in Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail.

Run transparency — what happened this run

What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.

  • D31 IaC & Container Security — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D33 JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.
  • D38 OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities — scanner not present in this environment — The backing tool was not installed where this scan ran, so this dimension was not scored. Install the tool (or run in the hosted environment, where it is always present) for a graded result.

Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.

Limitations & what we did not check

Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.

Per-dimension blind spots

For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.

  • D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
  • D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
  • D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
  • D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity (jscpd) — it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (EF migration scaffolds, *.Designer.cs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only; the generated footprint is reported separately under Solution Shape.
  • D5 Coupling: Coupling is measured between projects/assemblies — runtime coupling through DI, reflection, messaging or shared databases is invisible to a static reference graph.
  • D6 Cohesion (LCOM4): LCOM4 cohesion is syntactic — it infers connectivity from which methods touch which fields/methods by name, not from real runtime behaviour or intent.
  • D8 Code Coverage: Coverage is measured by building and running the suite (`dotnet test --collect`) inside Watchdog's isolated image — the target repo is never modified, and nothing on your systems runs. So coverage exists only when the suite builds and runs within the inline time budget; one that needs external services, can't build, or exceeds the budget yields no coverage (D8 then degrades to not-measured, not a low score). Line coverage also says nothing about assertion quality.
  • D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
  • D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
  • D13 Secret Scanning: Secret detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
  • D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
  • D16 Bus Factor: Bus-factor is a time-decayed model of commit attribution (who has recently, repeatedly worked a file), not comprehension — pairing, review and reading-without-committing spread knowledge it can't see; bot commits and shared accounts still distort it.
  • D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (EF migrations, designer files, snapshots) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
  • D18 Solution Shape: Build integrity reflects whether the solution compiled in this environment — a build that needs a private feed, a specific SDK, or a generated file absent from the repo can read as broken when it is merely unreproducible here.
  • D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement.
  • D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
  • D26 Project Cohesion: Project focus is sized from members/namespaces per project — a project that is broad by deliberate design reads the same as one that has sprawled.
  • D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
  • D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
  • D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and the advisory database — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen.
  • D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
  • D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
  • M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.

The LLM boundary

LLM-set scores this run (3): D19, D21, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score (documentation, ADR quality, naming, comment value, onboarding) — D25 sets the ADR-conformance fraction over sampled code, D22 judges API accuracy over a sample. These are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.

Dimensions

D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity3.4 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.

Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 3.4 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

64 method(s) exceeded the cyclomatic complexity threshold of 15; the worst was UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle at 118.

UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cyclomatic 118)My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:563
PropertyData.New.ctor (cyclomatic 81)My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:756
TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 54)My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:449
UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 47)My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:146
TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 46)My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:319

+ 59 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cyclomatic 118) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with UtilsMaterials.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 PropertyData.New.ctor (cyclomatic 81) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with HCPropertiesData.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 54) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with TaskUpdateBlocks.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D2 · Cognitive Complexity2.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.

Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

153 method(s) exceeded the cognitive complexity threshold of 15; the worst was TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal at 219.

TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cognitive 219)My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:449
TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 194)My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:319
TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cognitive 144)My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:524
UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces (cognitive 136)My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:375
MaterialTable.TraverseNodes (cognitive 127)My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2227

+ 148 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cognitive 219) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with TaskUpdateBlocks.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 1 TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 194) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with TaskCheckFilename.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 1 TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cognitive 144) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with TaskEditProperties.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D3 · God Classes6.1 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").

Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.1 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

30 god class(es) detected.

ClassTooLong: FormExpressionEditor · ×28My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:0
FileTooLong: My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb · ×22My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:0
TooManyMethods: Form_Main · ×3My Project/Form_Main.vb:0

What to do

  1. Resolve the 28 ClassTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with FormExpressionEditor.vb, FormPropertyFilter.vb, FormPropertyInputEditor.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (28 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 22 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with FormExpressionEditor.vb, Form_Main.vb, HCPropertiesData.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (22 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 3 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with Form_Main.vb, HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb, UtilsPreferences.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
  4. Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D4 · Code Duplication9.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.

Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 9.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

79 duplicated block group(s) detected.

Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) · ×10My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1010
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) · ×7My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:782
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) · ×7My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:329
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) · ×5My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:184
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) · ×5My Project/Task.vb:280

+ 30 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.

What to do

  1. Resolve the 10 Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb (2), TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb (2), FormPropertyFilter.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).
  2. Resolve the 7 Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with TaskCheckDrawings.vb (2), TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb (2), FormPropertyFilter.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 7 Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb (2), FormPropertyInputEditor.vb, TaskCheckInterference.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D5 · Coupling10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether volatile projects sit underneath others that depend on them (so their churn ripples upward), and whether project dependencies form cycles. A widely-depended-on but stable shared/kernel project is healthy, not penalised.

Method: Dependency cycles via elementary-DFS over real .csproj references, plus Martin instability (afferent/efferent) per project. Exhaustive over the reference graph, deterministic.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: afferent/efferent coupling + cycles computed over every production type — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

2 projects, 0 dependency cycle(s), 0 unstable depended-on project(s).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d5_recommendation.md.

D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4)4.2 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether a class's methods are focused on a single responsibility.

Method: LCOM4 cohesion per production class with at least two methods: connected components of methods sharing state or calls, computed syntactically. Deterministic, not a proxy.

Coverage: Exhaustive · type-level: LCOM4 cohesion computed over every production class — the population is all types, not a name convention.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 4.2 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

28 of 58 classes have LCOM4 above 3.

Low cohesion: UtilsCommon (LCOM4 16) · ×28My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:9

What to do

  1. Resolve the 28 Low cohesion finding(s) in Cohesion (LCOM4) — start with HCIsolatedTaskProxy.vb, Task.vb, TaskBreakLinks.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (28 warning-level).
  2. Enforce Cohesion (LCOM4) in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d6_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D8 · Code Coverage0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: How much of the code is actually exercised by tests.

Method: Coverage from coverlet runs or committed reports (Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov), computed per-file with structured exclusions for generated, trivial, and glue code. When the suite can't be built/run in-image AND no report is committed, coverage is reported NOT-MEASURED (excluded from the score) with the precondition to make it measurable — never a LoC-ratio proxy folded in as if measured. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

No automated tests — the solution has no test code.

No automated tests

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No automated tests finding(s) in Code Coverage. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
  2. Enforce Code Coverage in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d8_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D9 · Test Distribution0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.

Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No test projects found.

No tests found

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No tests found finding(s) in Test Distribution. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D12 · Dependency Hygiene10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.

Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 outdated, 0 vulnerable, 0 deprecated packages.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d12_recommendation.md.

D13 · Secret Scanning10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.

Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

Secret scan ran and found no leaked secrets.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d13_recommendation.md.

D15 · Churn × Complexity Hotspots10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.

Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No churn × complexity hotspots in the window.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md.

D16 · Bus Factor10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether knowledge is concentrated in too few people (the "bus factor").

Method: Living knowledge per author via time-decayed commit attribution (6-month half-life, focus weighting) across largest source files. Deterministic, avoids blame's mechanical-refactor false positives.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No source file's living knowledge is concentrated in a single author.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d16_recommendation.md.

D17 · Explicit Debt6.2 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.

Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.2 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Prevented

77 deducted debt markers + 0 dead symbols across 36376 LoC (1.9/KLoC) → score 6.2.

EmptyCatchBlock · ×72My Project/FormEditTaskListChangeColor.vb:127
XxxComment · ×3My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:375
TodoComment · ×2My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1228

What to do

  1. Resolve the 72 EmptyCatchBlock finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with UtilsSEApp.vb (9), TaskEditInteractively.vb (7), UtilsCommon.vb (7). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (72 issue-level).
  2. Resolve the 3 XxxComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with UtilsPreferences.vb (3). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (3 warning-level).
  3. Resolve the 2 TodoComment finding(s) in Explicit Debt — start with HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb, TaskUpdateBlocks.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
  4. Enforce Explicit Debt in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.

Detailed fixes: d17_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D18 · Solution Shape2.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether the solution is laid out in a sensible, conventional structure.

Method: Solution structure: project count, decomposition, shell-project detection, build success (confirmed failures cap the score); traced to actual .sln files and binaries. Deterministic.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 2.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

2 projects, 0 .cs files, 36376 hand-written lines of code (36376 production / 0 test), plus 10556 generated (EF migrations / designer / snapshots, excluded from quality), 0 inter-project edges (build failed).

Shell project: Housekeeper · ×2Housekeeper.vbproj
Build did not complete in the analyzer

What to do

  1. Resolve the 2 Shell project finding(s) in Solution Shape — start with Housekeeper.vbproj, HousekeeperCLI.vbproj. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d18_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D19 · Documentation Quality / 10Weak◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Weak / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

The README is a single file (README.md) with no accompanying architecture or design documentation and no XML documentation coverage. The body contains only credits information — sponsors, contributors, beta testers, and a legal disclaimers section — plus an open details panel that clips mid-sentence before any real content appears. There are no instructions for installing the project, running tests, or using the API; the README is essentially a one-line credit banner with no value.

No installation/run commands and no usage description exist in the visible text.README.md
XML-doc coverage: Housekeeper · ×2Housekeeper.vbproj

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 No installation/run commands and no usage description exist in the… finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D21 · Naming Consistency / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective Exemplary / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Verified

0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.

D26 · Project Cohesion0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether each project is a focused, coherent unit rather than an oversized grab-bag.

Method: Project size overshoot penalties (LoC / public-type count / namespace count, 2-of-3 flag) weighted by log magnitude. Exhaustive across projects, deterministic, LLM-independent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 0.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

1 of 2 projects flagged as possibly oversized/incoherent.

Projects may be oversized for their cohesion

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Projects may be oversized for their cohesion finding(s) in Project Cohesion. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d26_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D28 · Secrets (history)3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.

Method: Git-history secret scan via gitleaks detect over full history in an isolated checkout; each match flagged High. Exhaustive; degrades cleanly when tool absent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 3.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

7 finding(s): 0 critical, 7 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.

Rotate the exposed credentials — git history can't be un-committed

What to do

  1. Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).

Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.

Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.

Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

semgrep found no security issues.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d29_recommendation.md.

D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilities10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

What it measures: Whether any dependencies have known published vulnerabilities (CVEs), direct or transitive.

Method: NuGet CVE scan via dotnet list package --vulnerable including transitive; severity tally (Critical/High/Medium/Low) to 0-10 tight normalizer. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades when absent.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

No known-vulnerable NuGet packages (direct or transitive).

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d30_recommendation.md.

D34 · Knowledge Freshness10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.

Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 10.0 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Every significant source file has living knowledge — recently and meaningfully worked.

✓ On the Gold path — maintain.

Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md.

D35 · Change Coupling6.9 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.

Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.

Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling; coupling through a build step, config, or non-source file isn't seen.

Maturity: Documented → Verified → Prevented · effective 6.9 / 10 · rule-coverage 100% · ceiling Documented

Strongest change-coupling: Form_Main.vb↔UtilsPreferences.vb 68%; TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb↔TaskSaveModelAs.vb 67%; FormPropertyPicker.vb↔Form_Main.vb 67%

Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsPreferences.vb · ×10My Project/Form_Main.vb

What to do

  1. Resolve the 10 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with Form_Main.vb (6), FormExpressionEditor.vb, FormPropertyPicker.vb. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).

Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.

Frontend & cross-cutting dimensions

R = React/JS · M = Maturity · P = Readiness.

AX5 · Architecture & structure3.0 / 10Weak✓ Tool-verified

Other · Architecture — Whether the codebase has a recognisable, scale-appropriate structure (a named architectural style, or modular enough for its size) rather than being an ad-hoc ball of mud.

Method: Roslyn plus csproj analysis: architecture style detection (DDD, clean, vertical-slice, CQRS) and structure fitness for repo size. Deterministic.

  • ~36.4k production LoC (163 types) across 2 project(s) / 6 namespace(s) with no recognised architectural style or layering — at this size, deliberate module boundaries would help. No DDD/clean/vertical-slice/CQRS/transaction-script organisation was detected — code is likely organised ad hoc, which makes change and onboarding harder as it grows.

What to do

  • Introduce deliberate module boundaries — by feature (vertical slices) if your team prefers, or by layer (domain/application/infrastructure). Even splitting into a few cohesive projects with a clear dependency direction would help.
GD1 · Unfinished & placeholder code10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Unreviewed-generation residue: shipped members still throwing NotImplementedException, and placeholder string literals left in non-test, non-generated code. Scored as a quality signature, never as a claim about authorship.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: NotImplementedException throws and placeholder string literals in non-test, non-generated shipped code. Deterministic, code-shape signature.

M1 · Documentation (README)8.3 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.

Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.

What to do

  • Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
  • Add a README to the 1 of 2 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 1 pts.
M2 · Architecture documentation0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.

Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No Architecture Decision Records found — decisions aren't captured for future maintainers.
  • No C4/PlantUML/Mermaid diagram or architecture.md — the high-level shape isn't documented.

What to do

  • Start an ADR log (docs/adr/) recording significant decisions and their rationale.
  • Add a C4 context/container diagram (Structurizr, PlantUML or Mermaid) or an architecture.md overview.
M3 · Folder & project structure6.0 / 10Adequate✓ Tool-verified

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo is organised deliberately — src/test separation and consistent project naming.

Method: Filesystem scan: src/test folder separation and namespace-prefix consistency (majority RootNamespace agreement). Exhaustive across projects, deterministic.

  • Projects aren't grouped under a src/ folder — production and tooling code are mixed at the root.
  • Test projects aren't grouped under a tests/ folder — the test surface isn't separable from production code at a glance.

What to do

  • Group production code under src/ (or split deliberately, e.g. backend/ + frontend/) so production and tooling code aren't mixed at the root.
  • Group test projects under tests/ (or test/, spec/) so the test surface is discoverable and CI can scope it.
M4 · Documentation accuracy10.0 / 10Exemplary◐ Sampled · advisory

Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).

Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.

P1 · CI/CD gates0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether an automated pipeline builds and tests every change.

Method: Filesystem scan: CI workflow files (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, etc.) for build and test stages. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, …) — changes aren't gated by an automated build/test.

What to do

  • Add a CI workflow that builds and runs the test suite on every push/PR.
P2 · Observability0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether the code is diagnosable in production — structured logging, tracing/metrics, health checks.

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: structured-logging frameworks (Serilog, NLog), OpenTelemetry, and health-check endpoint patterns. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No ILogger/Serilog usage found — production issues will be hard to diagnose.

What to do

  • Adopt ILogger (or Serilog) and log at meaningful points across the projects.
  • Consider OpenTelemetry tracing/metrics and a health-check endpoint for operability.
P3 · Security & performance tooling0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified

Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).

Method: Filesystem/Roslyn scan: CodeQL, Dependabot, secret-scanning, and BenchmarkDotNet presence in pipelines and projects. Exhaustive, deterministic.

  • No static application security testing (CodeQL / security analyzers / codehealth) detected.

What to do

  • Add a SAST step (e.g. CodeQL) or a security analyzer package.
  • Enable Dependabot/Renovate or a dependency-review gate.
  • Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
X1 · Async correctness10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether the code avoids sync-over-async (deadlock-prone blocking on tasks) and async void.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: async methods scanned for .Wait()/.GetAwaiter().GetResult() and async-void outside event handlers. Deterministic, hard fact per invocation.

X3 · Exception handling10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether exceptions are handled rather than silently swallowed or rethrown with lost stack traces.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every catch clause counted; empty catches and bare rethrows flagged. Population is all catch clauses, not estimated. Deterministic, hard fact.

X4 · Structured logging10.0 / 10Exemplary○ Nothing flagged

Other · Code Health — Whether log calls use message templates (queryable) rather than interpolated strings.

Method: Roslyn syntax scan: every log call-site counted; interpolated-string first-argument violations flagged. Population is all log calls, not estimated. Deterministic.

Reference — by lens

The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.

LensScoreRatingImpact
Code Health73%Adequate — gated by D1, D2, D18Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Architecture41%Weak — gated by D26, AX5Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Maturity54%Adequate — gated by M2Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Readiness17%Critical — gated by D8, D9, P1, P2, P3Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Security77%Adequate — gated by D28Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Not included — 57 check(s) not relevant to this codebase

These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.

  • AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
  • AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
  • AX10 Code composition — no source files detected — code composition not applicable
  • AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
  • AX3 Project dependency cycles — no csproj graph available
  • AX4 Dependency direction — no csproj graph available
  • AX6 Interface segregation — no public interfaces
  • AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
  • AX8 Test isolation — no test/production split to check
  • AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
  • C1 Data Protection — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C2 Access Controls — No access-control surface detected in the analyzed source — no web/app surface to authorize (no HTTP API or web-UI project) and no authorization code at all (no [Authorize]/policies, no imperative guard methods). Access control is therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI, which is authorized by its CALLER, not by itself. If this codebase grows request handlers, the dimension reactivates and a default-deny posture is expected then.
  • C3 Audit Trail — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C4 Data Retention — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • C5 Data-Subject Rights — No personal data detected in the analyzed source — no PII-typed entity/column names (Email, FirstName, DateOfBirth, …), no ASP.NET Identity / user-account model, and no stored user credentials. GDPR data-protection controls are therefore N/A here. If this is intentional, record the no-PII posture in an ADR; if the app does process personal data, name those fields conventionally so this dimension activates.
  • D10 Test Quality — No tests in the analyzed solution to assess for quality.
  • D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included
  • D14 License Compliance — license scan produced no result — the tool ran but its JSON output could not be parsed; the offline NuGet fallback resolved nothing
  • D20 ADR Quality — N/A — ADRs are expected on deployable products with a user-facing host, not consumed libraries; no ADR log is required here.
  • D22 Internal API Consistency — No exposed public API
  • D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — At only 36k LoC across two projects the codebase is small and single-purpose despite the absence of declared bounded contexts.
  • D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
  • D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
  • D27 Navigability — symbol resolution incomplete — navigability not assessed
  • D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.
  • D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — No PII/GDPR ruleset is bundled (the public p/gdpr semgrep pack was retired) — data compliance is not assessed in this scan.
  • D33 JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilities — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside bin/obj (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.
  • D36 Supply-chain Provenance & Signing — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines.yml, Jenkinsfile, .circleci); there is no build to attest provenance for.
  • D37 Vulnerability-disclosure Policy — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md, .github/SECURITY.md, docs/SECURITY.md, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.
  • D38 OSV Dependency Vulnerabilities — No JS/npm lockfile found outside bin/obj (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); nothing for OSV to scan.
  • D39 IL Efficiency — The target did not build, so no IL was available to measure.
  • D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs and no dependency cycles — architectural integrity not assessed
  • DM1 Domain Modelling — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • ED1 Event-Driven — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • ED5 Idempotency — no mutating command handlers or message consumers detected — idempotency check not applicable
  • ES1 Event Sourcing — not run — 0/3 markers found
  • IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — no C# methods found
  • P12 CI test-gate honesty — no CI workflow found
  • P4 Deployment & Rollback — not evidenced — no deploy/rollback/approval signal in the repo; absence of evidence is not evidence of a manual release
  • P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
  • P6 Release Hygiene — not evidenced — no changelog, version stamp or semver release tag in the repo
  • P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not applicable — this isn't a service/API/worker
  • P8 Schema migrations — no EF Core usage detected
  • P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — run tests with `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` (or in CI) to enable this cross-layer check
  • PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance is assessed only for perf-relevant repos — a packaged library, one that ships benchmarks, or one already using allocation-aware APIs. This repo isn't one, so the Performance lens is not applicable and is excluded from the score.
  • S1 Web-Security Posture — No web surface detected in the analyzed source — no HTTP API or web-UI project (no controllers/minimal-API endpoints, no Razor/Blazor views) and no web middleware (HTTPS redirection, HSTS, security headers, cookies). Transport security, security headers, secure cookies, CSRF/input-validation and middleware-order controls are therefore N/A here — this is a library/CLI/worker, not a web app. Crypto hygiene was still checked and found nothing to flag. If this codebase becomes web-facing, the dimension reactivates automatically.
  • SC1 Supply-chain hygiene — no data
  • X2 Cancellation propagation — no async methods found
  • X5 Nullable reference types — no NRT-eligible projects

Appendix A — Findings (grouped)

The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.

Issue — 73 finding(s)
D17 · Explicit Debt · EmptyCatchBlock · ×72
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/FormEditTaskListChangeColor.vb:127 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/FormEditTaskListChangeColor.vb:135 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:724 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/FormSolidEdgeExplorer.vb:87 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/FormTeamCenterAdd.vb:294 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/Form_Main.vb:1597 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/Form_Main.vb:1613 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/Form_Main.vb:3848 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/HCPresets.vb:123 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:701 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1220 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:394 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:455 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:221 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:244 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:278 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb:225 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:63 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:641 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:647 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:653 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:659 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:665 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:671 — empty catch block
  • EmptyCatchBlock My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:677 — empty catch block
  • + 47 more in this group — see findings.md.
D8 · Code Coverage · No automated tests · ×1
  • No automated tests — No automated tests — the solution has no test code. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely.
Warning — 392 finding(s)
D3 · God Classes · ClassTooLong · ×28
  • ClassTooLong: FormExpressionEditor My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 557 lines, 23 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: FormPropertyFilter My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 493 lines, 26 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: FormPropertyInputEditor My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 409 lines, 23 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: HCPropertiesData My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 446 lines, 13 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: LinkFullNames My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 408 lines, 9 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: Task My Project/Task.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 493 lines, 21 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskBreakLinks My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 532 lines, 16 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskCheckDrawings My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 469 lines, 14 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskCheckFilename My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 545 lines, 10 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskCheckLinks My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 525 lines, 20 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 740 lines, 11 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskEditInteractively My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 592 lines, 11 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskEditProperties My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 857 lines, 14 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskPrint My Project/TaskPrint.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 498 lines, 15 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskRunExternalProgram My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 460 lines, 11 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskSaveDrawingAs My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 827 lines, 15 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskSaveModelAs My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 1094 lines, 18 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskShowHideConstructions My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 722 lines, 16 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskUpdateBlocks My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 1358 lines, 25 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 786 lines, 19 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 476 lines, 11 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 479 lines, 10 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 1133 lines, 19 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: UtilsCommon My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 849 lines, 28 methods.
  • ClassTooLong: UtilsExecute My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:0 — ClassTooLong — 556 lines, 10 methods.
  • + 3 more in this group — see findings.md.
D6 · Cohesion (LCOM4) · Low cohesion · ×28
  • Low cohesion: UtilsCommon (LCOM4 16) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:9 — UtilsCommon's methods form 16 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: Task (LCOM4 14) My Project/Task.vb:6 — Task's methods form 14 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: HCIsolatedTaskProxy (LCOM4 11) My Project/HCIsolatedTaskProxy.vb:10 — HCIsolatedTaskProxy's methods form 11 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskPrint (LCOM4 7) My Project/TaskPrint.vb:3 — TaskPrint's methods form 7 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: UtilsPreferences (LCOM4 6) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:5 — UtilsPreferences's methods form 6 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckMissingDrawing (LCOM4 6) My Project/TaskCheckMissingDrawing.vb:3 — TaskCheckMissingDrawing's methods form 6 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckInterference (LCOM4 5) My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb:3 — TaskCheckInterference's methods form 5 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskEditInteractively (LCOM4 5) My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:3 — TaskEditInteractively's methods form 5 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskShowHideConstructions (LCOM4 5) My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:3 — TaskShowHideConstructions's methods form 5 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskRunExternalProgram (LCOM4 5) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:10 — TaskRunExternalProgram's methods form 5 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskUpdatePartCopies (LCOM4 5) My Project/TaskUpdatePartCopies.vb:3 — TaskUpdatePartCopies's methods form 5 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckFilename (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:3 — TaskCheckFilename's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskSetDocumentStatus (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:3 — TaskSetDocumentStatus's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskUpdateBlocks (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:3 — TaskUpdateBlocks's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskBreakLinks (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:3 — TaskBreakLinks's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckDrawings (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:3 — TaskCheckDrawings's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:3 — TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCheckRelationships (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:3 — TaskCheckRelationships's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskEditProperties (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:6 — TaskEditProperties's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskEditVariables (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:5 — TaskEditVariables's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskFitView (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskFitView.vb:3 — TaskFitView's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:5 — TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:3 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskUpdateDrawingViews (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:3 — TaskUpdateDrawingViews's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • Low cohesion: TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable (LCOM4 4) My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:3 — TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable's methods form 4 groups that share no state and don't call each other — a sign it may have several responsibilities. Review whether it splits into focused classes.
  • + 3 more in this group — see findings.md.
D3 · God Classes · FileTooLong · ×22
  • FileTooLong: My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 594 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/Form_Main.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 3170 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 844 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1915 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 533 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 546 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 526 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 741 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 593 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 858 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 828 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1095 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 723 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1359 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 787 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 1134 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsCommon.vb My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 850 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsExecute.vb My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 557 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsFileList.vb My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 921 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 904 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 824 lines.
  • FileTooLong: My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:0 — FileTooLong — 562 lines.
D35 · Change Coupling · Change coupling · ×10
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsPreferences.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb` change together 68% of the time (69 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb ↔ TaskSaveModelAs.vb My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb — `My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb` and `My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb` change together 67% of the time (42 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: FormPropertyPicker.vb ↔ Form_Main.vb My Project/FormPropertyPicker.vb — `My Project/FormPropertyPicker.vb` and `My Project/Form_Main.vb` change together 67% of the time (10 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: FormExpressionEditor.vb ↔ UtilsPowerShell.vb My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb — `My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb` and `My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb` change together 65% of the time (13 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb` change together 64% of the time (14 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UCPropertyFilter.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb` change together 62% of the time (10 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: UCEditProperties.vb ↔ UCPropertyFilter.vb My Project/UCEditProperties.vb — `My Project/UCEditProperties.vb` and `My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb` change together 62% of the time (10 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsFileList.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/UtilsFileList.vb` change together 58% of the time (86 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UCEditProperties.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/UCEditProperties.vb` change together 57% of the time (13 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
  • Change coupling: Form_Main.vb ↔ UtilsCommon.vb My Project/Form_Main.vb — `My Project/Form_Main.vb` and `My Project/UtilsCommon.vb` change together 56% of the time (67 shared commits) with no explicit dependency — a hidden/logical coupling. If they belong together, co-locate them; if not, break the coupling.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) · ×10
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1010 — My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1010-1024 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1029-1043
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1123 — My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1123-1137 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1283-1297
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:350 — My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:350-364 | My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:229-243
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb:316 — My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb:316-327 | My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb:384-398
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:767 — My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:767-781 | My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:307-321
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:515 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:515-529 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:351-365
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:834 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:834-848 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:905-919
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:615 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:615-629 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:915-929
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:873 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:873-887 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1157-1171
  • Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:397 — My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:397-411 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1182-1194
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) · ×7
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:782 — My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:782-794 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:797-809
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1014 — My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1014-1026 | My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1030-1042
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:534 — My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:534-546 | My Project/FormVariableInputEditor.vb:358-370
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:513 — My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:513-525 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:282-294
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:606 — My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:606-618 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:332-344
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:649 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:649-661 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:940-952
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:692 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:692-704 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:983-995
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) · ×7
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:329 — My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:329-337 | My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:285-294
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb:153 — My Project/TaskCheckInterference.vb:153-162 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:549-558
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:581 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:581-590 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:597-606
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:748 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:748-757 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:931-940
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskPrint.vb:417 — My Project/TaskPrint.vb:417-426 | My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:687-696
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:421 — My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:421-430 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:443-452
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:191 — My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:191-200 | My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:218-227
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) · ×5
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:184 — My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:184-196 | My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:174-187
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:325 — My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:325-338 | My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:311-324
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:409 — My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:409-420 | My Project/FormVariableInputEditor.vb:290-303
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:344 — My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:344-357 | My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:381-394
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:965 — My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:965-978 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:986-999
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) · ×5
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/Task.vb:280 — My Project/Task.vb:280-290 | My Project/Task.vb:305-315
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:179 — My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:179-189 | My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:110-120
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:927 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:927-936 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1209-1219
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:954 — My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:954-964 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:997-1007
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:207 — My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:207-217 | My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:222-231
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) · ×4
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:402 — My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:402-412 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:126-136 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:82-92
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:123 — My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:123-133 | My Project/TaskPrint.vb:162-172 | My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:219-229
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckMissingDrawing.vb:41 — My Project/TaskCheckMissingDrawing.vb:41-51 | My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:67-77 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:243-253
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckPartCopies.vb:8 — My Project/TaskCheckPartCopies.vb:8-18 | My Project/TaskUpdateFlatPattern.vb:8-18 | My Project/TaskUpdateDesignForCost.vb:8-18
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) · ×4
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2098 — My Project/Form_Main.vb:2098-2104 | My Project/Form_Main.vb:2109-2115
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/TaskFitView.vb:249 — My Project/TaskFitView.vb:249-255 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1186-1192
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/TaskPrint.vb:307 — My Project/TaskPrint.vb:307-312 | My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:453-459
  • Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:586 — My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:586-592 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:601-607
D17 · Explicit Debt · XxxComment · ×3
  • XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:375 — 'Outlist.Add("\\ System.Subject <-- need to end with this format L=xxx YY") — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: PROJ-123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:376 — 'Outlist.Add("\\ xxx can be any number from 0 to 9999 And YY any two letters") — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: PROJ-123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • XxxComment My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:377 — 'Outlist.Add("\\ xxx will be transformed in D4 syntax (example 65 will became 0065)") — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: PROJ-123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
D3 · God Classes · TooManyMethods · ×3
  • TooManyMethods: Form_Main My Project/Form_Main.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 3102 lines, 186 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: HCStructuredStorageDoc My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 1914 lines, 36 methods.
  • TooManyMethods: UtilsPreferences My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:0 — TooManyMethods — 823 lines, 42 methods.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:526 — My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:526-541 | My Project/FormVariableInputEditor.vb:368-383
  • Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb:225 — My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb:225-240 | My Project/UCEditProperties.vb:236-251
  • Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:380 — My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:380-395 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:420-435
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1059 — My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1059-1071 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1074-1086 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1089-1101
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:160 — My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:160-171 | My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:790-802 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:451-463
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:361 — My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:361-373 | My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:346-358 | My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:383-395
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) · ×3
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:816 — My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:816-825 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:629-638 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:663-671
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:742 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:742-751 | My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:760-769 | My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:778-787
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1035 — My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1035-1044 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1045-1054 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1055-1064
D17 · Explicit Debt · TodoComment · ×2
  • TodoComment My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1228 — ' ###### TODO: Maybe don't assume string, but check the actual property type and proceed accordingly. ###### — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: PROJ-123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
  • TodoComment My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1045 — ' ###### TODO: Check for a duplicate block ###### — source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. `// REF: PROJ-123`), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code.
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:1087 — My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:1087-1106 | My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:640-661
  • Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:339 — My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:339-360 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:384-400
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:669 — My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:669-680 | My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:307-318 | My Project/TaskCheckMissingDrawing.vb:168-179
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 3) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1281 — My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1281-1292 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1301-1312 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1321-1332
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) · ×2
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:497 — My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:497-504 | My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:521-528
  • Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:535 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:535-542 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:799-806
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cyclomatic 118) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cyclomatic 118) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:563 — UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle has cyclomatic complexity 118 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · PropertyData.New.ctor (cyclomatic 81) · ×1
  • PropertyData.New.ctor (cyclomatic 81) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:756 — PropertyData.New.ctor has cyclomatic complexity 81 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 54) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 54) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:449 — TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 54 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 47) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 47) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:146 — UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions has cyclomatic complexity 47 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 46) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 46) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:319 — TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cyclomatic 45) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cyclomatic 45) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:524 — TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · MaterialTable.TraverseNodes (cyclomatic 44) · ×1
  • MaterialTable.TraverseNodes (cyclomatic 44) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2227 — MaterialTable.TraverseNodes has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_Main.Startup (cyclomatic 43) · ×1
  • Form_Main.Startup (cyclomatic 43) My Project/Form_Main.vb:1188 — Form_Main.Startup has cyclomatic complexity 43 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter (cyclomatic 39) · ×1
  • FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter (cyclomatic 39) My Project/FormTeamCenterAdd.vb:15 — FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 38) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 38) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:163 — TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsFileList.FindFiles (cyclomatic 38) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.FindFiles (cyclomatic 38) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:246 — UtilsFileList.FindFiles has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsFileList.SortByDependency (cyclomatic 37) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.SortByDependency (cyclomatic 37) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:904 — UtilsFileList.SortByDependency has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch (cyclomatic 37) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch (cyclomatic 37) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:941 — UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch has cyclomatic complexity 37 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces (cyclomatic 36) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces (cyclomatic 36) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:375 — UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray (cyclomatic 32) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray (cyclomatic 32) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1702 — LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 29) · ×1
  • TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 29) My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:102 — TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cyclomatic 29) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cyclomatic 29) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:858 — UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable (cyclomatic 28) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable (cyclomatic 28) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:88 — UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles (cyclomatic 27) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles (cyclomatic 27) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1006 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 27) · ×1
  • TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 27) My Project/TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.vb:96 — TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cyclomatic 26) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cyclomatic 26) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1385 — TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates (cyclomatic 25) · ×1
  • HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates (cyclomatic 25) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:153 — HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 25) · ×1
  • TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 25) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:111 — TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessFile (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessFile (cyclomatic 24) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:509 — UtilsExecute.ProcessFile has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks (cyclomatic 24) My Project/Form_Main.vb:1506 — Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 24) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 24) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:303 — TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes (cyclomatic 23) · ×1
  • BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes (cyclomatic 23) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2415 — BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 23) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 23) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:127 — TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cyclomatic 22) · ×1
  • HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cyclomatic 22) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:420 — HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream (cyclomatic 22) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream (cyclomatic 22) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1584 — LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList (cyclomatic 22) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList (cyclomatic 22) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:109 — UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem (cyclomatic 21) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem (cyclomatic 21) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1223 — UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 21) · ×1
  • TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 21) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:285 — TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 21) · ×1
  • TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 21) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:153 — TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView (cyclomatic 20) My Project/FormSolidEdgeExplorer.vb:64 — FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 20) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1322 — TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed (cyclomatic 20) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1538 — TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessAll (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessAll (cyclomatic 20) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:26 — UtilsExecute.ProcessAll has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions (cyclomatic 20) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:20 — UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings (cyclomatic 20) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:32 — UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders (cyclomatic 20) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders (cyclomatic 20) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:254 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs (cyclomatic 19) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:47 — FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames (cyclomatic 19) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:248 — TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement (cyclomatic 19) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:398 — TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles (cyclomatic 19) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles (cyclomatic 19) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:528 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop (cyclomatic 18) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2124 — Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders (cyclomatic 18) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:227 — UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures (cyclomatic 18) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:264 — TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 18) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:273 — TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 18) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:265 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains (cyclomatic 18) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains (cyclomatic 18) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:104 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles (cyclomatic 17) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:422 — UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename (cyclomatic 17) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:333 — TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename (cyclomatic 17) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:466 — TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed (cyclomatic 17) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1185 — TaskSaveModelAs.CheckBoxOptions_Check_Changed has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsSEApp.SEStart (cyclomatic 17) · ×1
  • UtilsSEApp.SEStart (cyclomatic 17) My Project/UtilsSEApp.vb:27 — UtilsSEApp.SEStart has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps (cyclomatic 16) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:622 — HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile (cyclomatic 16) My Project/UtilsDocumentation.vb:92 — UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView (cyclomatic 16) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:324 — TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cyclomatic 16) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:303 — TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage (cyclomatic 16) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:707 — TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal (cyclomatic 16) My Project/TaskUpdatePartCopies.vb:82 — TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsCommon.GetProp (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.GetProp (cyclomatic 16) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:677 — UtilsCommon.GetProp has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D1 · Cyclomatic Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp (cyclomatic 16) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp (cyclomatic 16) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:453 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cognitive 219) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal (cognitive 219) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:449 — TaskUpdateBlocks.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 219 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 194) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 194) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:319 — TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 194 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cognitive 144) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace (cognitive 144) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:524 — TaskEditProperties.DoFindReplace has cognitive complexity 144 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces (cognitive 136) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces (cognitive 136) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:375 — UtilsMaterials.UpdateFaces has cognitive complexity 136 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · MaterialTable.TraverseNodes (cognitive 127) · ×1
  • MaterialTable.TraverseNodes (cognitive 127) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2227 — MaterialTable.TraverseNodes has cognitive complexity 127 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 119) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal (cognitive 119) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:163 — TaskCheckFilename.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 119 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 116) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 116) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:146 — UtilsExecute.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 116 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.SortByDependency (cognitive 111) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.SortByDependency (cognitive 111) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:904 — UtilsFileList.SortByDependency has cognitive complexity 111 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cognitive 110) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle (cognitive 110) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:563 — UtilsMaterials.GetFeatureFaceStyle has cognitive complexity 110 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal (cognitive 104) · ×1
  • TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal (cognitive 104) My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:102 — TaskEditVariables.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 104 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles (cognitive 100) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles (cognitive 100) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1006 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.UpdateBaseFaceStyles has cognitive complexity 100 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray (cognitive 97) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray (cognitive 97) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1702 — LinkFullNames.ExtractFilenamesFromByteArray has cognitive complexity 97 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem (cognitive 96) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem (cognitive 96) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1223 — UtilsFileList.UpdateLVItem has cognitive complexity 96 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures (cognitive 92) · ×1
  • TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures (cognitive 92) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:264 — TaskCheckRelationships.CheckFeatures has cognitive complexity 92 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal (cognitive 88) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal (cognitive 88) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:303 — TaskSaveModelAs.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 88 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter (cognitive 86) · ×1
  • FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter (cognitive 86) My Project/FormTeamCenterAdd.vb:15 — FormTeamCenterAdd.SearchTeamCenter has cognitive complexity 86 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.FindFiles (cognitive 82) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.FindFiles (cognitive 82) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:246 — UtilsFileList.FindFiles has cognitive complexity 82 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal (cognitive 81) · ×1
  • TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal (cognitive 81) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:111 — TaskCheckRelationships.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 81 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cognitive 77) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cognitive 77) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:858 — UtilsCommon.SubstitutePropertyFormulas has cognitive complexity 77 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates (cognitive 74) · ×1
  • HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates (cognitive 74) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:153 — HCPropertiesData.UpdateFromTemplates has cognitive complexity 74 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal (cognitive 72) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal (cognitive 72) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingViews.vb:127 — TaskUpdateDrawingViews.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 72 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream (cognitive 70) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream (cognitive 70) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1584 — LinkFullNames.GetFullNameFromOLEStream has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks (cognitive 67) · ×1
  • Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks (cognitive 67) My Project/Form_Main.vb:1506 — Form_Main.CopyTemplatesToTasks has cognitive complexity 67 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement (cognitive 66) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement (cognitive 66) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:398 — TaskEditProperties.DoReplacement has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cognitive 64) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cognitive 64) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1385 — TaskUpdateBlocks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave has cognitive complexity 64 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 64) · ×1
  • TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 64) My Project/TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.vb:96 — TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 64 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cognitive 61) · ×1
  • TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cognitive 61) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:285 — TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessFile (cognitive 60) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessFile (cognitive 60) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:509 — UtilsExecute.ProcessFile has cognitive complexity 60 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp (cognitive 60) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp (cognitive 60) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:453 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.FollowLinksBottomUp has cognitive complexity 60 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal (cognitive 58) · ×1
  • TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal (cognitive 58) My Project/TaskUpdatePartCopies.vb:82 — TaskUpdatePartCopies.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 58 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.Startup (cognitive 57) · ×1
  • Form_Main.Startup (cognitive 57) My Project/Form_Main.vb:1188 — Form_Main.Startup has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles (cognitive 57) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles (cognitive 57) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:528 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateViewStyles has cognitive complexity 57 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps (cognitive 56) · ×1
  • HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps (cognitive 56) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:622 — HCPropertiesData.ScanFilesForProps has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 56) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 56) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:20 — UtilsFileList.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop (cognitive 56) · ×1
  • Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop (cognitive 56) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2124 — Form_Main.ListViewFiles_DragDrop has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable (cognitive 56) · ×1
  • UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable (cognitive 56) My Project/UtilsMaterials.vb:88 — UtilsMaterials.UpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs (cognitive 55) · ×1
  • FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs (cognitive 55) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:47 — FormPropertyInputEditor.CheckInputs has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView (cognitive 55) · ×1
  • TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView (cognitive 55) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:324 — TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawInView has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDimensionsOverridden (cognitive 55) · ×1
  • TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDimensionsOverridden (cognitive 55) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:362 — TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDimensionsOverridden has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 54) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 54) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1322 — TaskUpdateBlocks.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains (cognitive 54) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains (cognitive 54) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:104 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetContains has cognitive complexity 54 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cognitive 53) · ×1
  • HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas (cognitive 53) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:420 — HCStructuredStorageDoc.SubstitutePropertyFormulas has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.GetLinks (cognitive 52) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.GetLinks (cognitive 52) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:849 — UtilsFileList.GetLinks has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames (cognitive 52) · ×1
  • TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames (cognitive 52) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:248 — TaskCheckLinks.GetLinkFilenames has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile (cognitive 50) · ×1
  • UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile (cognitive 50) My Project/UtilsDocumentation.vb:92 — UtilsDocumentation.BuildReadmeFile has cognitive complexity 50 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 49) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 49) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:273 — TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 49 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.ProcessInternal (cognitive 48) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.ProcessInternal (cognitive 48) My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:192 — TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders (cognitive 46) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders (cognitive 46) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:254 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoReplaceBorders has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView (cognitive 45) · ×1
  • FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView (cognitive 45) My Project/FormSolidEdgeExplorer.vb:64 — FormSolidEdgeExplorer.PopulateTreeView has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.GetDocRange (cognitive 44) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.GetDocRange (cognitive 44) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:56 — UtilsCommon.GetDocRange has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.CopyProperties (cognitive 44) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.CopyProperties (cognitive 44) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:1088 — UtilsCommon.CopyProperties has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.VisitLinks (cognitive 43) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.VisitLinks (cognitive 43) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:193 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.VisitLinks has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsSEApp.SEStart (cognitive 43) · ×1
  • UtilsSEApp.SEStart (cognitive 43) My Project/UtilsSEApp.vb:27 — UtilsSEApp.SEStart has cognitive complexity 43 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename (cognitive 41) · ×1
  • TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename (cognitive 41) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:333 — TaskSaveDrawingAs.GenerateNewFilename has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename (cognitive 41) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename (cognitive 41) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:466 — TaskSaveModelAs.GenerateNewFilename has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCStructuredStorageDoc.ProcessFormula (cognitive 40) · ×1
  • HCStructuredStorageDoc.ProcessFormula (cognitive 40) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:600 — HCStructuredStorageDoc.ProcessFormula has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal (cognitive 40) · ×1
  • TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal (cognitive 40) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:153 — TaskRunExternalProgram.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckPartCopies.ProcessInternal (cognitive 39) · ×1
  • TaskCheckPartCopies.ProcessInternal (cognitive 39) My Project/TaskCheckPartCopies.vb:47 — TaskCheckPartCopies.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · LinkFullNames.ProcessRootStorage (cognitive 38) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.ProcessRootStorage (cognitive 38) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1523 — LinkFullNames.ProcessRootStorage has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCSavedExpressions.PopulateFromTextFile (cognitive 37) · ×1
  • HCSavedExpressions.PopulateFromTextFile (cognitive 37) My Project/HCSavedExpressions.vb:35 — HCSavedExpressions.PopulateFromTextFile has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes (cognitive 37) · ×1
  • BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes (cognitive 37) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2415 — BlockLibrary.GetNamesBytes has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessAll (cognitive 37) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessAll (cognitive 37) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:26 — UtilsExecute.ProcessAll has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch (cognitive 36) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch (cognitive 36) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:941 — UtilsPreferences.BuildTaskListFromScratch has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.GetProp (cognitive 36) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.GetProp (cognitive 36) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:677 — UtilsCommon.GetProp has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetWhereUsedBottomUp (cognitive 36) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetWhereUsedBottomUp (cognitive 36) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:568 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetWhereUsedBottomUp has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.DoBSAddByName (cognitive 35) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.DoBSAddByName (cognitive 35) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:838 — TaskUpdateBlocks.DoBSAddByName has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsPowerShell.RunScript (cognitive 35) · ×1
  • UtilsPowerShell.RunScript (cognitive 35) My Project/UtilsPowerShell.vb:20 — UtilsPowerShell.RunScript has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDraftSymbols (cognitive 35) · ×1
  • TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDraftSymbols (cognitive 35) My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:465 — TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDraftSymbols has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsFlatDXF (cognitive 34) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsFlatDXF (cognitive 34) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:629 — TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsFlatDXF has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetLinksBottomUp (cognitive 33) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetLinksBottomUp (cognitive 33) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:352 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.GetLinksBottomUp has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList (cognitive 32) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList (cognitive 32) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:109 — UtilsFileList.New_UpdateFileList has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders (cognitive 32) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders (cognitive 32) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:227 — UtilsPreferences.SetSEDefaultFolders has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawingViewsOutOfDate (cognitive 32) · ×1
  • TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawingViewsOutOfDate (cognitive 32) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:199 — TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDrawingViewsOutOfDate has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsPropertyFilters.ProcessFile (cognitive 31) · ×1
  • UtilsPropertyFilters.ProcessFile (cognitive 31) My Project/UtilsPropertyFilters.vb:105 — UtilsPropertyFilters.ProcessFile has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveDrawingAs.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 31) · ×1
  • TaskSaveDrawingAs.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 31) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:805 — TaskSaveDrawingAs.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.BT_ExportList_Click (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • Form_Main.BT_ExportList_Click (cognitive 30) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2385 — Form_Main.BT_ExportList_Click has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDesignCopies (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDesignCopies (cognitive 30) My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:220 — TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakDesignCopies has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextStyles (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextStyles (cognitive 30) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:629 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextStyles has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextCharStyles (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextCharStyles (cognitive 30) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:695 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateTextCharStyles has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateLinearStyles (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateLinearStyles (cognitive 30) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:762 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateLinearStyles has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateDimensionStyles (cognitive 30) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateDimensionStyles (cognitive 30) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:828 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.DoUpdateDimensionStyles has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormEditTaskList.MoveRow (cognitive 29) · ×1
  • FormEditTaskList.MoveRow (cognitive 29) My Project/FormEditTaskList.vb:84 — FormEditTaskList.MoveRow has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormPropertyListCustomize.MoveRow (cognitive 29) · ×1
  • FormPropertyListCustomize.MoveRow (cognitive 29) My Project/FormPropertyListCustomize.vb:86 — FormPropertyListCustomize.MoveRow has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.PopulateListView (cognitive 28) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.PopulateListView (cognitive 28) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:480 — UtilsFileList.PopulateListView has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.New.ctor (cognitive 28) · ×1
  • Form_Main.New.ctor (cognitive 28) My Project/Form_Main.vb:1131 — Form_Main.New.ctor has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTableStyles (cognitive 28) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTableStyles (cognitive 28) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:556 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTableStyles has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 27) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 27) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1101 — TaskSaveModelAs.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 26) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal (cognitive 26) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:166 — TaskEditProperties.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 25) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 25) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1639 — TaskUpdateBlocks.ButtonOptions_Click has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.GetFileNames (cognitive 25) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.GetFileNames (cognitive 25) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:714 — UtilsFileList.GetFileNames has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage (cognitive 25) · ×1
  • TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage (cognitive 25) My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:707 — TaskSaveModelAs.SaveAsImage has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckLinks.CheckLinks (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • TaskCheckLinks.CheckLinks (cognitive 24) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:319 — TaskCheckLinks.CheckLinks has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckRelationships.CheckSketches (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • TaskCheckRelationships.CheckSketches (cognitive 24) My Project/TaskCheckRelationships.vb:356 — TaskCheckRelationships.CheckSketches has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDimensionStyles (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDimensionStyles (cognitive 24) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:381 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDimensionStyles has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.GetSheets (cognitive 24) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.GetSheets (cognitive 24) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:354 — UtilsCommon.GetSheets has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCStructuredStorageDoc.GetProp (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • HCStructuredStorageDoc.GetProp (cognitive 23) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:698 — HCStructuredStorageDoc.GetProp has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.AddBlockOccurrences (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.AddBlockOccurrences (cognitive 23) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1011 — TaskUpdateBlocks.AddBlockOccurrences has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles (cognitive 23) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:422 — UtilsExecute.ProcessFiles has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsExecute.SetEndingStatus (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • UtilsExecute.SetEndingStatus (cognitive 23) My Project/UtilsExecute.vb:751 — UtilsExecute.SetEndingStatus has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormExpressionEditor.BT_SaveAs_Click (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • FormExpressionEditor.BT_SaveAs_Click (cognitive 23) My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:807 — FormExpressionEditor.BT_SaveAs_Click has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 23) My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:466 — TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal (cognitive 23) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:265 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.GetBaseStyles (cognitive 23) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.GetBaseStyles (cognitive 23) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:914 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.GetBaseStyles has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskBreakLinks.ProcessPropertyText (cognitive 22) · ×1
  • TaskBreakLinks.ProcessPropertyText (cognitive 22) My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:402 — TaskBreakLinks.ProcessPropertyText has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 22) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 22) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:851 — TaskEditProperties.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.BT_MoveToRecycleBin_Click (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • Form_Main.BT_MoveToRecycleBin_Click (cognitive 21) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2512 — Form_Main.BT_MoveToRecycleBin_Click has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoLinearStyles (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoLinearStyles (cognitive 21) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:502 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoLinearStyles has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextCharStyles (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextCharStyles (cognitive 21) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:632 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextCharStyles has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextStyles (cognitive 21) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextStyles (cognitive 21) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:685 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoTextStyles has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.UpdatePropertiesColumns (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.UpdatePropertiesColumns (cognitive 20) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1140 — UtilsFileList.UpdatePropertiesColumns has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormExpressionEditor.ButtonOK_Click (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • FormExpressionEditor.ButtonOK_Click (cognitive 20) My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:373 — FormExpressionEditor.ButtonOK_Click has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDetachedDimensionsOrAnnotations (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDetachedDimensionsOrAnnotations (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskCheckDrawings.vb:250 — TaskCheckDrawings.CheckDetachedDimensionsOrAnnotations has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFlatPattern.ProcessInternal (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskCheckFlatPattern.vb:47 — TaskCheckFlatPattern.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:303 — TaskRunExternalProgram.DevelopSnippetCode has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskSaveDrawingAs.SaveAsDrawing (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • TaskSaveDrawingAs.SaveAsDrawing (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:519 — TaskSaveDrawingAs.SaveAsDrawing has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDrawingViewStyles (cognitive 20) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDrawingViewStyles (cognitive 20) My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:454 — TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.DoDrawingViewStyles has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Prop.SetValue (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • Prop.SetValue (cognitive 19) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1416 — Prop.SetValue has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormPropertyFilter.MoveRow (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • FormPropertyFilter.MoveRow (cognitive 19) My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:348 — FormPropertyFilter.MoveRow has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormPropertyInputEditor.MoveRow (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • FormPropertyInputEditor.MoveRow (cognitive 19) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:227 — FormPropertyInputEditor.MoveRow has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormVariableInputEditor.MoveRow (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • FormVariableInputEditor.MoveRow (cognitive 19) My Project/FormVariableInputEditor.vb:155 — FormVariableInputEditor.MoveRow has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings (cognitive 19) · ×1
  • UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings (cognitive 19) My Project/UtilsPreferences.vb:32 — UtilsPreferences.SaveFormMainSettings has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormBlockLibraryBlockNames.ButtonOK_Click (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • FormBlockLibraryBlockNames.ButtonOK_Click (cognitive 18) My Project/FormBlockLibraryBlockNames.vb:189 — FormBlockLibraryBlockNames.ButtonOK_Click has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCPropertiesData.Populate (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • HCPropertiesData.Populate (cognitive 18) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:392 — HCPropertiesData.Populate has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.PlaceBlockOccurrence (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.PlaceBlockOccurrence (cognitive 18) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:913 — TaskUpdateBlocks.PlaceBlockOccurrence has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.ListViewFiles_KeyUp (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • Form_Main.ListViewFiles_KeyUp (cognitive 18) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2293 — Form_Main.ListViewFiles_KeyUp has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormEditInteractively.FormEditInteractively_Load (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • FormEditInteractively.FormEditInteractively_Load (cognitive 18) My Project/FormEditInteractively.vb:37 — FormEditInteractively.FormEditInteractively_Load has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpression (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpression (cognitive 18) My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:496 — FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpression has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormPropertyFilter.CheckInputs (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • FormPropertyFilter.CheckInputs (cognitive 18) My Project/FormPropertyFilter.vb:82 — FormPropertyFilter.CheckInputs has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UCPropertyFilter.FilterPropertyNames (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • UCPropertyFilter.FilterPropertyNames (cognitive 18) My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb:168 — UCPropertyFilter.FilterPropertyNames has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskPrint.ProcessInternal (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • TaskPrint.ProcessInternal (cognitive 18) My Project/TaskPrint.vb:217 — TaskPrint.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsTopLevelAssembly.ReportUnrelatedFilesOLD (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • UtilsTopLevelAssembly.ReportUnrelatedFilesOLD (cognitive 18) My Project/UtilsTopLevelAssembly.vb:284 — UtilsTopLevelAssembly.ReportUnrelatedFilesOLD has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UCEditProperties.FilterPropertyNames (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • UCEditProperties.FilterPropertyNames (cognitive 18) My Project/UCEditProperties.vb:145 — UCEditProperties.FilterPropertyNames has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UCTaskControl.UpdateAppliesToCBs (cognitive 18) · ×1
  • UCTaskControl.UpdateAppliesToCBs (cognitive 18) My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:52 — UCTaskControl.UpdateAppliesToCBs has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · HCSavedExpressions.GetSavedExpressionFromShorthandText (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • HCSavedExpressions.GetSavedExpressionFromShorthandText (cognitive 17) My Project/HCSavedExpressions.vb:194 — HCSavedExpressions.GetSavedExpressionFromShorthandText has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpressionParameters (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpressionParameters (cognitive 17) My Project/FormExpressionEditor.vb:574 — FormExpressionEditor.ProcessExpressionParameters has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakConstructionCopies (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakConstructionCopies (cognitive 17) My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:273 — TaskBreakLinks.DoBreakConstructionCopies has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckLinks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • TaskCheckLinks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave (cognitive 17) My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:586 — TaskCheckLinks.DataGridViewOptions_Leave has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskFitView.ProcessInternal (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • TaskFitView.ProcessInternal (cognitive 17) My Project/TaskFitView.vb:113 — TaskFitView.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckDuplicates (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckDuplicates (cognitive 17) My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:301 — TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.CheckDuplicates has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsCommon.GlobToRegex (cognitive 17) · ×1
  • UtilsCommon.GlobToRegex (cognitive 17) My Project/UtilsCommon.vb:418 — UtilsCommon.GlobToRegex has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · LinkFullNames.FormatByteString (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • LinkFullNames.FormatByteString (cognitive 16) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:2023 — LinkFullNames.FormatByteString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckFilename.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskCheckFilename.CheckStartConditions (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:575 — TaskCheckFilename.CheckStartConditions has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateBlocks.DoWSAddByName (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateBlocks.DoWSAddByName (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:737 — TaskUpdateBlocks.DoWSAddByName has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · UtilsFileList.CreateColumns (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • UtilsFileList.CreateColumns (cognitive 16) My Project/UtilsFileList.vb:1198 — UtilsFileList.CreateColumns has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleAssemblyButton_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleAssemblyButton_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2846 — Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleAssemblyButton_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.TaskHeaderTogglePartButton_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_Main.TaskHeaderTogglePartButton_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2873 — Form_Main.TaskHeaderTogglePartButton_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleSheetmetalButton_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleSheetmetalButton_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2899 — Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleSheetmetalButton_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleDraftButton_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleDraftButton_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/Form_Main.vb:2925 — Form_Main.TaskHeaderToggleDraftButton_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · Form_Main.ButtonPresetSave_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • Form_Main.ButtonPresetSave_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/Form_Main.vb:3956 — Form_Main.ButtonPresetSave_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.ProcessInternal (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.ProcessInternal (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:136 — TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.ProcessInternal has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskEditProperties.DoFormulaSubstitution (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskEditProperties.DoFormulaSubstitution (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:491 — TaskEditProperties.DoFormulaSubstitution has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:821 — TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.ButtonOptions_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D2 · Cognitive Complexity · TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 16) · ×1
  • TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ButtonOptions_Click (cognitive 16) My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:1275 — TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.ButtonOptions_Click has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15).
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (91 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (91 lines × 2) My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:373 — My Project/TaskSaveDrawingAs.vb:373-463 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:505-595
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (34 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (34 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:298 — My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:298-307 | My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:980-989 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:536-569
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (24 lines × 2) My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1110 — My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1110-1133 | My Project/HCStructuredStorageDoc.vb:1134-1157
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) My Project/UCEditProperties.vb:348 — My Project/UCEditProperties.vb:348-370 | My Project/UCTaskControl.vb:250-271
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (21 lines × 2) My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:436 — My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:436-456 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1375-1394
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (19 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (19 lines × 3) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:266 — My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:266-281 | My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:914-928 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:646-664
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:210 — My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:210-220 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:375-393
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb:140 — My Project/UCPropertyFilter.vb:140-157 | My Project/UCEditProperties.vb:196-212
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (17 lines × 5) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (17 lines × 5) My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:530 — My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:530-544 | My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:563-577 | My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:596-610 | My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:630-646 | My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:715-729
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (14 lines × 6) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (14 lines × 6) My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:976 — My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:976-988 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:991-1003 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1044-1056 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1104-1117 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1120-1132 | My Project/HCPropertiesData.vb:1135-1147
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 5) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 5) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1222 — My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1222-1231 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1232-1241 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1242-1252 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1273-1282 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1283-1295
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (13 lines × 4) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:554 — My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:554-566 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1102-1114 | My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:216-228 | My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:795-807
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (12 lines × 5) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 5) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1308 — My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1308-1319 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:504-515 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:683-694 | My Project/TaskRunExternalProgram.vb:449-460 | My Project/TaskSaveModelAs.vb:1087-1098
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (12 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCheckFlatPattern.vb:60 — My Project/TaskCheckFlatPattern.vb:60-71 | My Project/TaskUpdateFlatPattern.vb:59-70
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 7) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 7) My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:70 — My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:70-80 | My Project/TaskEditVariables.vb:56-66 | My Project/TaskShowHideConstructions.vb:388-398 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelSizeInVariableTable.vb:143-153 | My Project/TaskUpdateModelStylesFromTemplate.vb:210-220 | My Project/TaskUpdatePartCopies.vb:40-50 | My Project/TaskUpdatePhysicalProperties.vb:53-63
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 6) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 6) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:111 — My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:111-121 | My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:54-64 | My Project/TaskBreakLinks.vb:123-133 | My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:103-113 | My Project/TaskEditProperties.vb:114-124 | My Project/TaskFitView.vb:68-78
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (11 lines × 4) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (11 lines × 4) My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:632 — My Project/TaskCheckFilename.vb:632-642 | My Project/TaskCheckLinks.vb:670-680 | My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:308-318 | My Project/TaskCheckMissingDrawing.vb:169-179
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (10 lines × 6) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (10 lines × 6) My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1191 — My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1191-1200 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:413-422 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:823-832 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:833-842 | My Project/TaskUpdateDrawingStylesFromTemplate.vb:843-852 | My Project/TaskUpdateMaterialFromMaterialTable.vb:467-476
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 5) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 5) My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:397 — My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:397-405 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:446-454 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:462-470 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:478-486 | My Project/TaskEditInteractively.vb:494-502
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:150 — My Project/TaskSetDocumentStatus.vb:150-158 | My Project/TaskUpdateBlocks.vb:1101-1109 | My Project/TaskCheckMaterialNotInMaterialTable.vb:215-223
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:177 — My Project/FormPropertyInputEditor.vb:177-185 | My Project/FormVariableInputEditor.vb:105-113
D4 · Code Duplication · Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) · ×1
  • Duplicated block (5 lines × 2) My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:463 — My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:463-467 | My Project/TaskCreateDrawingOfFlatPattern.vb:469-473
Recommendation — 7 finding(s)
D18 · Solution Shape · Shell project · ×2
  • Shell project: Housekeeper Housekeeper.vbproj — `Housekeeper` contributes only 0 significant line(s) — an empty/placeholder project is structural noise. Remove it or fold its contents into a real project.
  • Shell project: HousekeeperCLI HousekeeperCLI/HousekeeperCLI.vbproj — `HousekeeperCLI` contributes only 0 significant line(s) — an empty/placeholder project is structural noise. Remove it or fold its contents into a real project.
D11 · Test Reliability · Test reliability not included · ×1
  • Test reliability not included — No test projects found, so reliability couldn't be assessed.
D19 · Documentation Quality · No installation/run commands and no usage description exist in the visible text. · ×1
  • No installation/run commands and no usage description exist in the visible text. README.md — Add INSTALL/USAGE sections describing how to set up the project, run tests, and invoke the main API.
D26 · Project Cohesion · Projects may be oversized for their cohesion · ×1
  • Projects may be oversized for their cohesion — 1 of 2 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is `Housekeeper` (36311 LoC, 131 public types across 1 namespaces). Review these for cohesion — split a project that spans unrelated responsibilities.
D28 · Secrets (history) · Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
  • Rotate the exposed credentials — git history can't be un-committed — Some of these secrets are in git HISTORY: deleting the file does not remove them (the commit persists on every clone, fork and backup). The remediation is to ROTATE each historically-exposed credential and treat it as compromised — not to delete the file. Rewriting history is disruptive and unreliable across existing forks. (Working-tree-only secrets — no commit — can instead be removed from the file and moved to a secret store.)
D9 · Test Distribution · No tests found · ×1
  • No tests found — No test projects found in the repository.
Info — 4 finding(s)
D19 · Documentation Quality · XML-doc coverage · ×2
  • XML-doc coverage: Housekeeper Housekeeper.vbproj — Housekeeper: 100 % XML-doc coverage (0/0).
  • XML-doc coverage: HousekeeperCLI HousekeeperCLI/HousekeeperCLI.vbproj — HousekeeperCLI: 100 % XML-doc coverage (0/0).
D18 · Solution Shape · Build did not complete in the analyzer · ×1
  • Build did not complete in the analyzer — `dotnet build` reported 2 error(s) but no C# compiler diagnostic — an SDK / target-framework / restore mismatch in the analyzer environment, not a code defect (common for an older codebase whose target framework the analyzer's SDK can't build). Solution Shape is scored on structure and is NOT capped; the C# semantic analysis loads independently and is unaffected.
D22 · Internal API Consistency · No exposed public API · ×1
  • No exposed public API — No intentionally-exposed types (IsPackable or .Contracts) to evaluate.

Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail

Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.

DimensionToolVersionCommandFindingsRaw output
D28 · Secrets (history)gitleaks—gitleaks detect --no-banner --report-format json --report-path /dev/stdout --exit-code 0 --source .7artifacts/raw/gitleaks-history.json
D29 · Static Analysis (SAST)semgrep—semgrep --config /opt/semgrep-rules/security-audit.yml --config /opt/semgrep-rules/owasp-top-ten.yml --json --quiet --timeout 0 --metrics off .0artifacts/raw/semgrep.json
D30 · Dependency Vulnerabilitiesdotnet—dotnet list Housekeeper.sln package --vulnerable --include-transitive --format json0artifacts/raw/dotnet-vulnerable.json
D31 · IaC & Container Securitytrivy—trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation); nothing to scan.0—
D32 · Data Compliance (PII/GDPR)semgrep—semgrep: not applicable — No PII/GDPR ruleset is bundled (the public p/gdpr semgrep pack was retired) — data compliance is not assessed in this scan.0—
D33 · JS/npm Dependency Vulnerabilitiestrivy—trivy: not applicable — No JS/npm manifest or lockfile found outside bin/obj (package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); no JS dependencies to scan.0—
D36 · Supply-chain Provenance & Signingprovenance—provenance: not applicable — No CI/build pipeline found (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines.yml, Jenkinsfile, .circleci); there is no build to attest provenance for.0—
D37 · Vulnerability-disclosure Policydisclosure—disclosure: not applicable — No vulnerability-disclosure policy file found (SECURITY.md, .github/SECURITY.md, docs/SECURITY.md, .well-known/security.txt). A coordinated-disclosure policy may live off-repo, so this is not evidenced rather than failed.0—
D38 · OSV Dependency Vulnerabilitiesosv-scanner—osv-scanner: not applicable — No JS/npm lockfile found outside bin/obj (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, bun.lockb); nothing for OSV to scan.0—

Run 019fdec4-95d2-7bef-abc7-33cf5ec7f229 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.

Issues: 73 · Warnings: 392 · Recommendations: 7 · Info: 4 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 08-08-2026 @ 00:27 UTC.

Downloadable artifacts

Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.

⬇ Findings, MITRE CWE-tagged .sarif⬇ Health changelog .md