{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"]}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CharParsers.pint (cyclomatic 28): CharParsers.pint has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df9b636977f7f1547b2507d193b28e5aafbdfdda0a65e7e1bb1c10f776d918b5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CharParsers.puint (cyclomatic 23): CharParsers.puint has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":440}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4cd664e2bc5c61f1cb316a6aaa9fc8d3ce1990115bbd512486aaeecd13a1416"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FloatParsers.parseHexOrDecFloat (cyclomatic 16): FloatParsers.parseHexOrDecFloat has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd9d815de2131a5dd3c7168e638f05d3bb4ee28e5247c511a857bd43ce82e4a5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FloatParsers.parseHexOrDecFloat (cognitive 56): FloatParsers.parseHexOrDecFloat has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (33 pts), match/switch 5 (23 pts) (nesting depth added 39). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs holds 4 of the 8 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 84 of the 133 points over it (63%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/XParsec/Combinators.fs at 31). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2c2ae22112b1846fcc13a6f304058f282e7cd70477afbec44f67fc7cc201d18"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CharParsers.pint (cognitive 38): CharParsers.pint has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (18 pts), match/switch 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 7 (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs holds 4 of the 8 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 84 of the 133 points over it (63%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/XParsec/Combinators.fs at 31). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf0997376524e870be2528a927c38e559626cddd3e9af21612c8836cf426f726"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Combinators.skipManyTill (cognitive 32): Combinators.skipManyTill has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 7 (22 pts), if/else 1 (6 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 22). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64f31689cb0759443f3d148ecab5fb20aa684845e36bb7ea2446a840e22f5970"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LineIndex.GetLineCol (cognitive 31): LineIndex.GetLineCol has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (24 pts), match/switch 2 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/ErrorFormatting.fs"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f314751819e496003678b5cbc9ba3ed575f76a6f566a3e323c18a0aa908d1065"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CharParsers.puint (cognitive 29): CharParsers.puint has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), match/switch 7 (12 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs holds 4 of the 8 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 84 of the 133 points over it (63%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/XParsec/Combinators.fs at 31). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":440}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"684ee2ca50c866d6ef214668939e5b116806ae9020786b9dcab6fa3217e74b15"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Combinators.manyTill (cognitive 29): Combinators.manyTill has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 6 (19 pts), if/else 1 (6 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d222ac305255ae84b26d0c5983704f3a7e4bafb0d33a2955fedaf5496771d4b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FloatParsers.parseDecimalFloat (cognitive 21): FloatParsers.parseDecimalFloat has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 3 (11 pts), if/else 6 (10 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs holds 4 of the 8 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 84 of the 133 points over it (63%), 2.7\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/XParsec/Combinators.fs at 31). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":746}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a1b8fa0ce17ed3fb21e66901825f3dd1ab7a2bdf0dc05b509de13971951601a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Handlers.parse (cognitive 17): Handlers.parse has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 4 (12 pts), if/else 2 (4 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"interactive/XParsec.Server/Handlers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ec55e770e90554c006b33262e724cd45cb7789c598568591104b7a01f4b7a69"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: XParsec/Combinators.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 989 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), declaring 61 functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 489 over it, 1.98\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20472c58072e77153bd79df398ea1bb4a5e0ef2903d00d7da51e459ea54ecd37"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 691 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 191 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cf984da2dd370e41ba0fc7f344e85a40be02a34d9d70dff1cb0bd49b28a7a5c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: XParsec/CharParsers.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 688 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), declaring 49 functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 188 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73362bcc6861adb4256bc25cb2a22aa616d800f191966efce2395a3a5104cea5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: XParsec/Readables.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 583 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 83 over it, 1.17\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd6e0d54bc033a4d76cf2d7caa6d7eb91cc9606db48d0c5185eb328a6904058a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (39 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:260-298 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:477-515 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Readables.fs:260\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b94923cb1d692dc2894a8577190705b662bee5cd0ff45f0e462f280ea947c40e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29\u201330 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:398-426 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:498-527 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":398}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee9025b55c014b15bdb7242a86bb4cdf42a0cf7e37b8208c168c1f7b3ac5472e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26\u201328 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:966-991 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1004-1031 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":966}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"473ba75530374bfb85c9403835fde6b32e0e7f4bc0da44a6f0ed984416366726"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:829-854 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:870-895 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":829}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afa17f017dba871128b905e296e642feb587b883995e37a05bed47d1b13d8b34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:177-197 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:207-226 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"019af855bff176d14ff4249ec853552b0e8ff118d6261191d45c2d00b946c742"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19\u201321 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1046-1064 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1081-1101 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1046}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be99d7cf5cd9045429a1212dc67adbf1552d9bf825638cba92b6cbeac603ade3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:104-122 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:250-268 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:467-485 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a97f7c1643a18c2052740d26bd29e8d5952e4d08e90bad5bda2f313dc19ca2d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:911-929 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1056-1073 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":911}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a3cae5542159ac08af2ebcc7ba6e6e56d07ac9f94bbc2d666d8808279590b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:904-920 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:937-955 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":904}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d643205e419b1ebab77d5cb3e649a6524778cffc6362f2ffefb4b2b49c629ef7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:28-44 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:171-187 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:381-397 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"810c3bbfa371875273bb0da734ef88b60955ace7f39ec43ae54e02918fcb9221"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:102-117 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:134-148 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbe38486cf3c035aa87cc6460103c72809d7f0a38a71df8ba613e9083977acac"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201316 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:676-687 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:699-714 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"854468f21641b72a48d62e3405166e1dbe652c02344eab3fd5f1c64d9c8448a6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:694-709 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1388-1403 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:694\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":694}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b0c94403868a4d1733878cddc67352e0c2935a60c795f2736d0979a6863d3a4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:846-861 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:985-1000 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:845\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:983\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":846}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c30a0e89b30017cfd90bfa8ff537cbe85d7adb030f9140092039056d4c5602d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1128-1142 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1172-1186 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29a4f03de6637c47d5818a745dc0ee479ff80f8cd5d3f3be09403d6c11111fbc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201315 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:344-357 | src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:362-376 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:344\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Parsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":344}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fa79381c48c6b2b1516bb2d12856fa1f76af886894b1b50bb9c7b99484d78fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 4): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:147-160 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:293-306 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:510-523 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:790-803 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Readables.fs:147\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa8a5e62d203904d77572d908918e3c72e41871f55e1081ae59b2e1482304c3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:78-91 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:221-234 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:431-444 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"504dc37d736be95222c012ba14781adfa107fdb52808392e04a347430fab75b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:825-838 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:962-975 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:977\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:840\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":825}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f67a835ed2de5310735193ea261cb2962a67114c74e3cb8a182fccb47f2f01c0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:900-910 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1039-1052 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":900}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f821867f80f7c5b28be82a1704c796f794f5d408e0b3df5c208e8e3bd3df8040"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:307-320 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:336-348 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":307}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f746ec8c018217effdf846c8008606f70d7333bf42d6f5bf7bd6fd5ceca87658"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:399-411 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:499-512 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:703-716 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":399}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65dd9984f9423dd0b9091dffb4ff527fb8e59b8fb3b6202334d815a71e0a4cf5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (3\u201313 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:931-943 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1001-1003 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1075-1087 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:931\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":931}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53cececb1d5111486952aab0fbdfc4b15bfb2f04f7bde07b7eb8e06ea411efcd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1167-1179 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1269-1281 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1166\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1268\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f89ded108c61012a8797300cc6ed346dc29a62f3635912b782a0d0fa7b8f4de6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11\u201312 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:176-187 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:206-217 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:246-256 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":176}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12b3d8e6d13a9811508f13eb3220cae602ed7ec9d2d90361f060c716a27e2786"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1127-1138 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1171-1182 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1223-1234 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1140\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1235\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1127}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a3389afb958862738c850eb79b79a5668281b5db68dff8bab4cb7ee63c17080"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1191-1202 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1291-1302 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1191\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8b71a87171300348c982fb2c8e1c8d29d781a044957f9026a8c9ea3008d07fc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:125-136 | src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:139-150 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Parsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5eaa76ab6b1c1af24a40978c456225b91e8bef6e8f0c6a9c5ce641aeaae6c305"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:829-839 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:870-880 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:966-976 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1004-1014 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:977\u0060 calls \u0060Add\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:840\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":829}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68ae992ee5d2cc069aa467d8666478657623254c96b5cec01556ffffcc001eb0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): interactive/XParsec.Client/src/Serialization.fs:24-33 | interactive/XParsec.Server/Serialization.fs:26-35 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060interactive/XParsec.Client/src/Serialization.fs:24\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"interactive/XParsec.Client/src/Serialization.fs"},"region":{"startLine":24}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f22de85028ad661cf443fdb6b301b8ce0ae5d23296c240db907f33d7b62450b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1144-1153 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1187-1196 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d91f8ba7fe2e69928e169ce6628ab82bfe43a67baecb40d03a72982d057c7a0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1238-1247 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1287-1296 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2e38427d51db8ed998c18ebb7e96c00697ea8cad41e1578a54e3342b8dd6dd1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:451-460 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:537-546 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":451}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83d3a43899b5d34f7bfa3eeef766eb2ad9bc42ab958195c5c256242d93f9ee49"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:101-109 | src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:111-119 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Parsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ae854cbd62a291d42eb850708684b2325d98d795c4bea5b910647d3d8e20375d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:524-531 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:538-545 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9448ab3eef40c098cfaebd51cbac5302e7711c32b177203b23997ee34165d438"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:507-514 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:577-584 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":507}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b55fc4969b2e010bdeaffc54805f190914c540deac7b3104fe4a520f01d6f663"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:89-96 | src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:99-106 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:89\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Parsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0444f5d17179dcbaee9f573a438bb3fb3225a08ce7b4ba4d4af37e7a4447df34"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:404-411 | src/XParsec/Parsers.fs:444-451 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Parsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":404}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d117cabd9870e72195381c04c8fc45a16cf3e87c741ff98df0326e71c97ba3c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:102-108 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:118-124 | src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs:134-140 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e1ced71b14a10a8d0540d8af0aef9edd05447c180776813d2478d2814f8d2d1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Readables.fs:197-203 | src/XParsec/Readables.fs:407-413 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Readables.fs"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0ff27cc7fac094b4555f60d4fe44f6461f9270e43a6408c36cb660f73e7225a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:46-51 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:59-64 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"173268c4180a9718c94d2d87cabdf4cd46a4ea63ee54144d5d72ff4594bc81cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1148-1153 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:1242-1247 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1148}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9ed83cdd222d379e2da8a85112d5056ef5ffcc7cd79d4df2c3953db289c10e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:92-96 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:105-109 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:224-228 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:237-241 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":92}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25a5f456787b80c2be9e2e8794613e402a59c538ca868fb2177d3393e3712129"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:118-122 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:131-135 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:250-254 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:263-267 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa836378667f2c91cfd7b73a059f81a9d7d71e33075e9ceb68c24c6a9c2a2237"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:144-148 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:157-161 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:276-280 | src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs:289-293 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/ByteParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcbdb7584d16a870c4959e3391d75c2457bdc130c22fbe5f57e0dcba1a0e3183"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:35-39 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:45-49 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:58-62 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ab0bbc7a8196c58374c6d2e57b06cf979e6d6a38d2ee0882b896d4e664388baf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): bench/XParsec.Json.Benchmarks/FParsecJson.fs:93-97 | src/XParsec.Json/JsonParser.fs:94-98 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"bench/XParsec.Json.Benchmarks/FParsecJson.fs"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15d2e5c9cd5fe1e4a76281664a60047eba35d62917b6c1a6ade8de1c78e84972"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:427-431 | src/XParsec/Combinators.fs:440-444 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":427}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87652d940e423e577a5319591bbcafff0474561f2d49e57300ed215265ba7fad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:207-211 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:216-220 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0bce4c13fb8b45d759558717207ff81137b2ecd6193f4781991aefb7845e84de"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:633-637 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:766-770 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:771\u0060 calls \u0060Postfix\u0060 and \u0060src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:638\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":633}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c5dfce8d85e87f8918c9d7809dced3991bc3077bb3d41483e02feb92d0ef006"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:560-568 | src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs:601-609 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":560}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"463c144a31b2cb30fe56fa9d935ffb2b5ec545509ef00e4f8b2904cc8d71dd75"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 no coverage collector is wired up: Coverage NOT MEASURED: \u0060--collect:\u0022XPlat Code Coverage\u0022\u0060 names a data collector that ships in the \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 package, and this repository wires up none \u2014 no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, \u0060--collect\u0060 produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs: src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs changed 17 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 31 in PrecedenceModule.bindingPower at line 81. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 14 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-02-08..2026-05-09, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-02-08 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-05-09 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/OperatorParsing.fs"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"851c8bff1df39ce3575ec225b85799b6041fba0cdb2a04dbcdc59216169fc60c"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs: src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs changed 9 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 28 in CharParsers.pint at line 326. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 7 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-02-08..2026-05-09, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-02-08 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-05-09 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/CharParsers.fs"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0125be6ddc83695187bc15a51a18d0f052bcaca1dad7345b1a8d6b8bbf5c5e8b"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/XParsec/Combinators.fs: src/XParsec/Combinators.fs changed 13 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in Combinators.skipManyTill at line 1202. 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 10 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-02-08..2026-05-09, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-02-08 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-05-09 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/XParsec/Combinators.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/Combinators.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1202}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f1ba82749e55fa9c78c7409419f854aca19e70a1534c1be713641c33c9b107e"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/XParsec/ErrorFormatting.fs: src/XParsec/ErrorFormatting.fs changed 7 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 22 in ErrorFormatting.formatParseError at line 207. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 6 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-02-08..2026-05-09, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-02-08 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-05-09 16:11:59 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/XParsec/ErrorFormatting.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/XParsec/ErrorFormatting.fs"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94d14e0f5ebdc0aaf2555e192f4fd5e5ba86ae18f6d51696e48701bc2be38240"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D27","level":"note","message":{"text":"Scattered collaborators: 89 % of calls cross a namespace and only 32 % of collaborators are co-located \u2014 group each feature\u0027s code into a vertical slice so a call\u0027s collaborators sit together."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5aad4a4530bac3928d3a065a664be89d023ecfc865f9bf79ac05754b3bffe322"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9603565aa6069e0abcf535dcde33980e7f55a15fa6af1c7abedeeffe7f52bf08"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa8ee490371acdad2b62b958843583a0e94f30a79a22194bc3bc46d8eab253e9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8500bd444dd29b22a2b7ee47bd5fb7323de7a5296fca9e95d0d7da12354cfcad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dc31a9cb4781029b8c8959d9c88c82346a5c72537102bdee63a26fbe524accc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e9e9d938b2c8da22bea3ca1a54d8a9c4f22108683329559c9cdd3187495ca2c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50adbcd711dca68f872cf2be71adcafe71227cad845e99d760eb77a975a1047e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0368062220b7d03a1fa9e9d2bccb854d86c67fc9ecc0cc9ff48703e4ad75233a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4605d90208aa912f686365b6f14debdbcc499c88d697f0cbfb5b0cc49f87e4d2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63bea608fd98974a5a312ed989a52706c988bfdbb0e401f0928bf7ee4f23d1b9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-552","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c3314cd0128be805bcdeedae15c9c29641a5193f7b86f03604a7481065269d7"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"seroval","version":"1.1.1","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b0349be6e4392c44c7e23af4da89cd53a729b5515479259ae12b99d6ef47742"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"nanoid","version":"3.3.9","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a244482c8c1776cd4336324849ce01d7a46360ea0680812e9b390d17b0def0f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"postcss","version":"8.5.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5b6e98e51d65637c23a65e69b1b7b6ee517586fe87b061e171d7899a5d58d500"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"browserslist","version":"4.23.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30c581b3514383aaa1e859d50b77545971c57dced231a7aa045a58abcb7793f2"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"vite","version":"6.2.3","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"test-or-tooling","file":"interactive/XParsec.Client/vite.config.mts","line":1}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4838597316370abce7bcace63d9dafe0c5d1e45a0d6dbea2e0a53599da234c67"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"rollup","version":"4.35.0","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d65e6f55e0d13a801ee4f5dec784e35fd21a5e7a2b63602744b5e3a1248aaf9"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/helpers","version":"7.25.6","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a74c0256b7b73cb8aa24e8c76f9697f44b67ea83a127945f66045c3930d9e2f"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"@babel/core","version":"7.25.2","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"not-imported"}}}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0752d0df7434000fcabf1048e2de30a7a1a8b982b3db9a19898c4dec199856b4"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d068c977b62d9a977df1bb6f53e8b00b586c3abee955f91d715f92b8e019d624"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5928b81075799790cb18fed2980a6b6e8aa5072772041c9951633efe8eb3542"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe274ba5adebde25ca0b3db842e44cbb1aaeb7cfecfbb7215cd452596ba1f4c2"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 plus gitleaks for committed secrets (F# is not a CodeQL language and has no language-specific SAST engine) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 3477 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No release approval gate: The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY\u0027S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under \u0060.github/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.forgejo/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.gitea/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.azuredevops/\u0060 and \u0060.azure-pipelines/\u0060, plus \u0060.gitlab-ci*\u0060 and \u0060azure-pipelines*\u0060 \u2014 with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab\u0027s \u0060when: manual\u0060, CircleCI\u0027s \u0060type: approval\u0060, an Azure \u0060ManualValidation@\u0060 task or an \u0060approvals:\u0060 block, a Jenkins \u0060input\u0060 step, a \u0060uses:\u0060 step naming an approval action, an \u0060environment:\u0060 paired with \u0060reviewers\u0060 / \u0060required_reviewers\u0060 / \u0060protection\u0060 / \u0060wait-timer\u0060 / \u0060deployment_branch_policy\u0060, a draft-release step, a \u0060workflow_dispatch\u0060 promotion, or a release-event gate. \u2605 What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy \u2014 all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c11e2dbd483b4b423b95ac61bfcc7af1d55351b28a20d2b1105b31cfe38cc60"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"CWE-506","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-506"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"CWE-522","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-522"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-552","guid":"3492436b-eca2-9c54-9ba3-5dade427c903","name":"CWE-552","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-552"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/552.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":26,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}