Public report — phpunit, published 26 Sep 2026.
Concrete security findings (which rule fired, in which file, on which line; CVE IDs, secret matches,
dependency versions) are REDACTED in this version; ask the repo owner for the full report.
Public
Codebase surveyMeasured under the Code Assurance Index · rubric rubric-2026.09.15 (frozen) · verify this surveyFiledcd_ecbd7967973249dfb795437efc352023
Filed 26 September 2026, 04:59 UTC
Public
Medium · 89,399 LoC · rebuild ~1.9 person-years · weakest lens: Maturity (65%)
Findings by grade
2 critical588 serious54 minor42 could not be resolved — could be critical — see Limitations
This survey was produced by
Watchdog
Producer
Canine Development
Analyzer
Watchdog engine 1.0.0
Measured
26 September 2026, 03:17 UTC
A measurement, not a certificate. The Code Assurance Index does not certify,
approve or guarantee this codebase; it records a reproducible number and the evidence it was computed from. The
standard is authored by Canine Development, who also build Watchdog — its only implementation today. That is said
here so the number is checked rather than believed.
Grounded in facts. Every number here is computed, not narrated — reproducible, tool-backed, and traceable to a line of code. How to trust this ▸
632findings with an exact file:lineof 644 — the remainder are repo-wide signals (a dimension-level measurement, not a single line); open any file:line and verify
33/115dimensions across the health lenses89399 LoC — wide & deep
The system holds a strong overall standing of 73%, indicating a healthy asset that is currently carrying manageable but compounding risks. With nearly 90,000 lines of production code and a rebuild cost of approximately €280,000, the organization has significant value tied up in this codebase. The high volume of test code suggests a mature testing culture, yet the architecture and documentation gaps threaten to erode the speed and reliability of future deliveries if left unaddressed.
The most critical risk is a hidden velocity tax on every change. Code quality signals average a moderate 6.5 out of 10, which acts as a drag on development speed. This inefficiency compounds as the codebase grows, meaning that routine modifications in weaker areas cost significantly more time and effort than they should. This tax translates directly into higher operational costs and slower feature delivery, creating a financial burden that accumulates with every release cycle.
A secondary concern is the lack of documented decision-making context. Without clear records of why architectural choices were made, new team members face a steep learning curve, and existing engineers risk repeating past mistakes or making inconsistent changes. This gap in maturity increases the likelihood of defects and delays, as developers must reverse-engineer intent rather than building upon established patterns. It also exposes the business to knowledge silos, where critical understanding resides only in individual minds.
Despite these risks, the system demonstrates genuine strength in its architectural cohesion and security posture. The high scores in these areas provide a stable foundation for growth, and the robust test coverage offers confidence in regression safety. These positives ensure that the system is reliable and secure, allowing the business to focus on improving development efficiency without worrying about fundamental stability or safety issues.
The first action should be to record significant decisions in a centralized, discoverable format. This low-effort intervention pays for itself quickly by reducing the time spent on context-switching and decision re-evaluation. By establishing a clear record of design intent, the team can immediately reduce the velocity tax and improve onboarding, unlocking faster delivery speeds with minimal investment.
How the score is built — each lens's share of the headlineWidth is the lens's weight in the worst-heaviest fold (the weakest area pulls hardest); colour is that lens's own band. A lens fixes the score in proportion to its width.
590 finding(s) are new versus the previous scan (2026-08-07) — surfaced by this scheduled scan itself, no pull request required. Showing the first 100; the full set is in the report.
A full-fidelity diff against the previous run's complete recorded findings — line-move tolerant: a finding that only shifted line counts as unchanged, only genuinely new titles/files surface here.
1.1× (at 73% quality) — the last 20% of quality is most of the work
Size & shape
Medium · effort split not classified (source measured from disk; the effort-tier breakdown is a C#-only syntax walk)
This codebase represents roughly ~1.9 person-years of build effort (about ~€280,000 to rebuild). Its weakest lens is Maturity at 65% — the part of that asset most exposed by the findings below.
How we model this: boilerplate at a scaffolding rate + logic × domain Standard (×1.0) — standard service × a 1.1× quality factor, at €60–95/h; indicative, ±~30% · size measured directly from source · effort from total production LoC as straight-line logic (the tier split is a C#-only syntax walk), a conservative lower bound. Indicative only — most sensitive to the hourly rate and the domain tier (both tunable in config).
Top priorities
The highest-leverage moves; the full ranked list is in the Roadmap below.
1
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form).
The top-ranked fix costs roughly 1–3 engineer-days once. Not doing it costs about 20.9–125.5 engineer-days every year, paid as drag on the ~222,042 lines this team changes annually — a bill that arrives whether or not anyone books it. On those figures the fix breaks even in roughly 1–2 months and is free after that. Method, stated so this is not read as a quotation: debt from the ranked task's effort band; interest = annual changed lines (measured, annualised from the 90-day window) ÷ an ASSUMED 150–400 lines per engineer-day × the 4–8% drag implied by the code-quality signals; breaking point = debt ÷ annual interest. A modelled planning range built from measured inputs and one named assumption — not a quotation, a valuation, or a certified figure.
Evidence: D15 churn: 54,750 line(s) changed over a 90-day window ⇒ ~222,042/year · D1/D2/D4 code quality: averaging 6.5/10 ⇒ a 4–8% drag on each change · top-ranked remediation: Low effort ⇒ about 1–3 engineer-day(s)
→ Do the top-ranked fix now if this code will still be yours in 2 months.
Highest-leverage move · Medium · Leverage
Of everything flagged, the best return on effort is: Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form). The rest can wait behind it.
Evidence: priority ranking: top of 5 ranked by impact/effort
→ Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form).
A velocity tax on every change · Medium · Economics
The code-quality signals (complexity, duplication, cohesion) average 6.5/10, which acts as a tax on every change in the weaker areas: modifications there plausibly cost on the order of 4–8% more than in clean code, and the tax compounds as the codebase grows. (A modelled estimate, not a measured fact.)
Evidence: D1/D2/D4 code quality: averaging 6.5/10 across the code-quality signals actually measured
→ Pay it down where churn is highest — the hotspots — not everywhere; that's where the tax is actually paid.
Findings mapped to OWASP categories; the specific CVEs/secrets are in the Security dimension cards below and findings.md (redacted only on the public version of this report).
OWASP category
Findings
Severity
A02:2021 — Cryptographic Failures
2
High / Critical
Roadmap
Begin by establishing a structured repository for architecture decisions, ensuring each significant choice is documented with its context and consequences in a consistent format. Simultaneously, enhance project accessibility by adding a testing section to the root README and resolving existing documentation gaps to improve overall codebase clarity. Finally, strengthen release safety by implementing draft release gates or manual dispatch triggers to prevent faulty builds from reaching users, ensuring a controlled and rollback-capable deployment process.
Ranked by impact ÷ effort. "Helps" is the estimated gain on the 0–100 health score.
Do this
Helps
Effort
Dimension
Resolve the 1 No ADRs found finding(s) in ADR Quality.
Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form).
Nothing pauses a release for a human: publish as a draft release (or gate the release job on a protected tag/manual dispatch) so a bad build can be stopped before users can download it.
Test Quality: No assertions: testVerifyDoesNothingWhenErrorLogOutputWasNotExpected
How the grades work
Every finding carries one of four grades. Three say how serious it is. The fourth says this
survey could not settle it — and it is a grade, not a gap.
Critical — 2
A definite problem that already costs you something and drags the score down: a
missing authorisation check, a dependency with a known exploit, a build that does not reproduce. Failure here
tends to cause failures elsewhere.
Serious — 588
Likely wrong, but not failing yet. It degrades
the codebase over a longer horizon and can cause failures elsewhere — not urgent this week, not something to
carry for two years either.
Minor — 54
Recorded, with no effect on how the codebase functions.
Present so the survey is complete, not because it needs doing.
Could not be resolved — 42
Something this survey could not settle
from the outside, and which could be critical or serious. Either a control was required and no
positive evidence of it exists in the repository — a backup job that nothing shows was ever restored from proves
nothing about restores — or our own analysis could not run over that part of the tree. This is not a clean
result. These are excluded from the score rather than awarded a pass, so the number on the cover neither
rewards nor penalises them: if you act on this survey without resolving them, you carry that risk yourself. Each
one is named under Limitations.
Methodology & how to trust this report
Watchdog is a deep, periodic assessment — run each sprint, monthly, or quarterly, taking the time to go wider and deeper than a quick check and surfacing in one coherent report what you'd otherwise piece together from a dozen separate tools. It scores deterministically: the same commit yields the same score, every run. 29 of 33 evaluated dimensions are computed purely by tools and static analysis (confidence 1.0); 4 documentation/naming judgement(s) are LLM-assisted and labelled advisory. Overall confidence is 0.9 — the weighted average across measured dimensions; it falls as more of the score leans on LLM-assisted judgement and rises when it's fully tool-backed.
Every figure here is one of three kinds, and we label which: ✓ Measured — a deterministic fact (LoC, complexity, coverage); ~ Modeled — an estimate from a stated model (cost, effort, value-at-risk), always a range with its assumptions, never a precise fact; ◐ Advisory — an LLM prose judgement. We never present a modelled estimate as if it were measured. Perfect or absent scores carry their provenance too (ADR-0011): ✓ Tool-verified means the property itself was measured across the surface; ○ Nothing flagged means the probes came back clean — a claim bounded by what a repository can show; ⊘ Not evidenced means a working control (a tested restore, an automated rollback) showed no positive evidence — absence of evidence is not evidence of a control, so it's excluded from the score rather than awarded a spurious 10; ◐ Sampled · advisory marks an LLM verdict over a bounded sample — advisory, never a deterministic measurement.
What we checked — 33 dimensions across the health lenses
Each chip is a dimension scored from real signals across architecture, testing, dependencies, security & compliance, documentation, git-history and code quality — in one coherent pass. A surface report typically covers a handful.
How to trust any code-health report — three questions
Can you open the finding? Real findings cite a repo-relative file and line you can open at the cited line — never an absolute scratch path. Here, 632 of 644 do; the remainder are repo-wide signals — a dimension-level measurement, not a single line. (Every path in this report is repo-relative by construction: paths are normalized at the producer and the report is rejected if any rooted path leaks through.)
Is there a tool behind the number? Every score below names the method that produced it — Roslyn, git, a scanner, or (for a handful of documentation/naming dimensions) an LLM labelled sampled · advisory — not a narrative.
Does re-running give the same result? Run it again on the same commit and the score — and this report, byte for byte — is identical. A report whose numbers move between runs is describing the run, not the code.
This report answers yes to all three. That's the bar to hold any assessment to.
Tools & methods
The actual versions used this run (captured at analysis time) — re-run on the same commit for the identical score.
Method
Backs
Version
Evaluator
Roslyn static analysis
Complexity, cohesion, coupling, dead code, API surface, layering
What ran differently this time — a tool absent, degraded, or that fell back to an estimate. Named openly, not folded silently into the scores. A degraded run also records its exact cause in diagnostics.md.
D8 Code Coverage — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Coverage NOT READ here — but this repository measures it: a coverage step in CI (`phpunit --log-junit test-results.xml --coverage`) shows that coverage is collected and tracked in your own CI. The built-in collector has no runner for this ecosystem (.php), so the analyzer could not read the number — a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not an unmeasured repo. Not scored. To have the real number read, produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures. You can widen what we reach: optional: produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures — then the real number is read on the next scan.
D11 Test Reliability — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Test source is present (.php) but the built-in reliability runner does not support this repository's ecosystem, so flakiness couldn't be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D14 License Compliance — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. Not scored — this repository's package manifest is not parsed for licence data yet. A gap in the analyzer's language coverage, NOT a finding that the repository's licenses are compliant (composer.json), which this pass does not parse yet — so this dimension asserts nothing about this repository's licensing in either direction.
D16 Bus Factor — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. Single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable (375 contributor(s) across 20000 commit(s) sampled, automation and bot accounts excluded). One of them holds 86% of the history; the other 374 hold 0% each on average, below the 5% at which there is somebody to hand the work to. That is a single maintainer with drive-by contributors, not a team whose knowledge has concentrated — so the bus factor is not applicable and there is nothing here for the owner to act on.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. `src/Event/Dispatcher/DeferringDispatcher.php`, `src/Event/Dispatcher/DirectDispatcher.php`, `src/Event/Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php`, `src/Event/Events/Application/Finished.php`, `src/Event/Events/Application/Started.php`, … (+422 more) produced a parse error, so every rule in this engine's `gdpr.yml` was absent there. That absence is NOT a clean result: these rules detect personal data crossing a boundary into a log sink, a URL or browser storage, and a file that was never parsed cannot report any of the three. The rest of the tree analysed normally and its rows above stand; only these files are unaccounted for. You can widen what we reach: fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover it.
AX3 Project dependency cycles — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over which project references which. That is a language-neutral question, but the project-reference graph is collected from MSBuild .csproj files only, and this repository commits none — so there was no graph to read, and re-running the same commit reads the same nothing. Its modules are declared as: Composer packages (composer.json). A reader for that graph is the collector this check is missing. That is a COLLECTOR gap in this analyzer — no change to the scan image closes it — and not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AX4 Dependency direction — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the direction each project reference points. That is a language-neutral question, but the project-reference graph is collected from MSBuild .csproj files only, and this repository commits none — so there was no graph to read, and re-running the same commit reads the same nothing. Its modules are declared as: Composer packages (composer.json). A reader for that graph is the collector this check is missing. That is a COLLECTOR gap in this analyzer — no change to the scan image closes it — and not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AX6 Interface segregation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over the public interfaces this run's compilations declare, and none was loaded, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
AX8 Test isolation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is computed over which projects are test projects, and what they reference. That is a language-neutral question, but the project-reference graph is collected from MSBuild .csproj files only, and this repository commits none — so there was no graph to read, and re-running the same commit reads the same nothing. Its modules are declared as: Composer packages (composer.json). A reader for that graph is the collector this check is missing. That is a COLLECTOR gap in this analyzer — no change to the scan image closes it — and not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
C1 Data Protection — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These personal data controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks personal data controls.
C2 Access Controls — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These authorization controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks authorization controls.
C3 Audit Trail — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These audit controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks audit controls.
C4 Data Retention — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These retention controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks retention controls.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These data-subject rights controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks data-subject rights controls.
ED5 Idempotency — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check finds retry-prone mutations by walking the repository's declared types, and NONE was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to look at. That is a limit of the analyzer's reach — it reads .NET projects — not a finding that this repository has no command handlers or message consumers.
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
P5 DR & Backup — not measured this run — This is a true statement about the repository that carries nothing for its owner to act on, so it is reported here rather than as a defect in their code. No backup/snapshot/replication config, RTO/RPO or restore-procedure documentation was found — and no production persistence was detected either (no data-access packages, no data-store services, no database resources), so there is nothing in this repository whose loss a DR control would recover. If this system's data lives in a platform or ops repo we can't see, that's where the DR evidence belongs.
S1 Web-Security Posture — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. These web-security controls are read from declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names and guard methods in a C# source model, and none was loaded on this run, so there was nothing to gather. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository lacks web-security controls.
X1 Async correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X12 Unreachable branch — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X13 Undrained process stream — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X14 Bypassable address classification — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X20 Mistyped argument guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X22 Contradicted release guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X25 Inert configuration knob — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X28 Index access outside its own emptiness guard — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X3 Exception handling — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X4 Structured logging — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
X5 Nullable reference types — not measured this run — Watchdog could not measure this here. That is a gap on our side — a collector, parser or image we have not built yet — and it is neither a defect in this repository nor evidence that the check would have passed. This check is implemented over the C# syntax tree, and no C# was loaded on this run, so it had nothing to read. That is a gap in this analyzer's language reach — not a finding that the repository is free of what this check looks for.
Repo exclusion declarations (.gitattributes linguist-generated/vendored, .editorconfig generated_code): none declared — every source file was scored.
Limitations & what we did not check
Watchdog assesses the repository exactly as committed, and only the repository. By design it does not reach outside the source tree: the live cloud account, the running CI/CD pipeline, the host's branch-protection and approval rules, the production configuration, or a restore actually exercised against a backup are all out of scope. That boundary is a feature, not a gap — a repo-relative, deterministic scan re-runs identically on any commit and every finding opens at a real file and line, where a live audit can neither be reproduced nor traced. The visible consequence is that controls which leave no in-repo evidence are reported as "not evidenced" and excluded from the score rather than awarded a number a static scan cannot justify.
Per-dimension blind spots
For each dimension that was measured, what a static, repo-only scan structurally cannot see — the honest edge of the measurement, not a failure of it.
D1 Cyclomatic Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity counts branches statically — it cannot tell an essential decision tree from accidental tangle, nor see complexity that lives in data or configuration (large switch-case token tables, DSL lexers/parsers, data-as-code rule tables) rather than control flow: a tokenizer's many single-character cases read as high complexity though each branch is trivial.
D2 Cognitive Complexity: Cognitive-complexity heuristics approximate how hard code is to follow; genuine domain difficulty and well-named intent that eases reading are not captured.
D3 God Classes: "God class" is sized by members and responsibilities visible in the type — a deliberately broad facade over a coherent subsystem can read the same as an accidental grab-bag. For front-end JS the file-length check is cohesion-aware (a single-responsibility module — one class/IIFE — earns a 3× threshold), but cohesion is approximated from top-level declarations, not true dependency structure.
D4 Code Duplication: Duplication is token-similarity — an in-process token-stream comparison over sliding windows, with type-aware normalization — so it finds copy-paste, not semantic duplication expressed differently. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, protobuf/OpenAPI stubs, model snapshots) is EXCLUDED — its repetition is the tool's, not the team's — so the score reflects hand-written duplication only.
D9 Test Distribution: The test-pyramid shape is inferred from project/folder naming and references, with a single test host bucketed per-file by its path tier and content signals — a suite that names tiers unconventionally and gives no per-file signal can still be mis-bucketed.
D10 Test Quality: Assertion density is structural — it cannot tell a meaningful behavioural assertion from a trivial one, only that an assertion is present.
D12 Dependency Hygiene: Dependency health reads manifests and lockfiles — a vulnerability in a vendored/copied dependency, or risk from how a dependency is actually used, is outside this view.
D13 REDACTED Scanning: REDACTED detection is signature- and entropy-based on the current tree — a secret that does not match a known pattern, or one already rotated, will not be flagged (a clean scan is "nothing matched", not "no secrets exist").
D15 Churn × Complexity Hotspots: Churn hotspots come from git history — a freshly imported or squashed repository has no churn signal, and recent rewrites can mask a historically risky file.
D17 Explicit Debt: Acknowledged-debt signals (TODO/FIXME, suppressions, dead code) are textual — undocumented debt that nobody marked, and debt that lives in design rather than annotations, is invisible. Committed machine-written code (scaffolded migrations, designer/codegen output, generated stubs) is excluded — it is never the team's dead code to delete.
D19 Documentation Quality: Documentation quality is judged by an LLM over a bounded sample of docs — it reads what is written, not whether the docs match the running system, and it is advisory, not a measurement. Its critique rows are drawn from a closed category vocabulary and each row means the same thing in every run, so two scans can be compared row by row; the SET that fires is still a sample, and does not repeat exactly. Measured on one frozen input, six scans at one engine SHA: 2-5 critique rows per scan, 8 distinct rows across the six, 3 of those 8 seen in only one scan. So a D19 row is evidence about the documentation, but a COUNT of D19 rows is not a quantity — never read a change in it as an improvement or a regression.
D20 ADR Quality: ADR quality is an LLM read of the decision records present — it cannot know about decisions made and never recorded, and its verdict is sampled and advisory.
D21 Naming Consistency: Naming quality is an LLM judgement over a bounded sample — it assesses clarity/consistency of the names it sees, not domain-correctness, and is advisory.
D22 Internal API Consistency: API-surface coherence is an LLM judgement over a sample of the public surface — consistency of intent across the whole API is approximated, not exhaustively verified.
D27 Navigability: Indirection/navigability is structural — it measures hops to follow a call, not whether that indirection buys real flexibility or just ceremony.
D28 Secrets (history): Secret-history scanning sweeps the git log for known patterns — a secret that predates the available history, or never matched a signature, is not found (clean means "nothing matched in the history we can see").
D29 Static Analysis (SAST): SAST findings are pattern-based (semgrep) — it finds classes of bug it has rules for; logic flaws, auth/authorization gaps and issues needing runtime context are out of reach (and clean means "no rule matched").
D30 Dependency Vulnerabilities: CVE matching depends on accurate package/version metadata and on the advisory databases — a vulnerability with no published advisory, or in code not declared as a dependency, is not seen. Coverage needs a RESOLVED graph: an unpinned requirements.txt, or a pom without a resolved build, yields partial coverage rather than a clean verdict. An ecosystem the analyzer cannot scan is reported as unmeasured, never as clean.
D34 Knowledge Freshness: Freshness is decayed commit RECENCY, not comprehension — code read often but rarely committed reads as orphaned, and stable code that genuinely needs no changes is penalised the same as forgotten code; bot/squash commits distort it like the bus factor.
D35 Change Coupling: Change coupling is co-change in COMMITS — files split across separate commits, or coupled only through a shared config/build step, read as uncoupled, and a sweeping commit (rename/format) is excluded so it doesn't couple everything. It shows that files change together, not WHY: a high coupling can be a healthy cohesive pair as readily as a hidden leak.
D43 Malicious Dependencies: Only packages some vulnerability database has already NAMED as malicious are seen — a compromise published in the last hours, or never reported at all, is invisible here, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a dependency is trustworthy. There is no typosquat or dependency-confusion analysis: a package nobody has reported is simply absent from the feeds. Coverage is the dependency scan's: an ecosystem that could not be scanned is disclosed as unmeasured, never as clean.
D44 Platform End-of-Life: The support table is FROZEN, so it goes out of date by losing RECALL: a release that ended support after the table was written is missed until the table is refreshed, and this dimension reading 10 is not evidence that a platform is current. Only platforms the repository DECLARES in a place this pass reads are seen — a runtime named only in a Dockerfile (D31's subject), in a CI workflow (D29's), or in a file this pass does not parse (go.mod, a Gemfile ruby directive) is invisible here, which is why a repository declaring none of them abstains rather than scoring. Only frameworks with a PUBLISHED support policy are tracked: React, Flask and Express publish none, so their age cannot be judged and their absence from a report is not a statement that they are supported.
AX10 Code composition: Role is inferred from namespace/folder convention, not semantics — a domain concept living in a folder named "Services" reads as application, and the split is lines-of-code, not business value. The business-logic-share score is a SOFT, FLOORED signal: it contributes to the Architecture lens but is floored at the Critical gate, so an infrastructure-heavy design (a gateway, an ETL, a driver) is legitimately low without being nuked to zero.
M4 Documentation accuracy: Onboarding quality is an LLM read of the docs/setup present — it cannot run the onboarding or measure how long a real new joiner takes; the verdict is sampled and advisory.
P4 Deployment & Rollback: Approval/branch-protection rules live in repository settings the scan cannot see — only their in-repo evidence (config files, workflows) is checked, so a control enforced purely in the host's settings reads as "not evidenced".
P6 Release Hygiene: Rollback/observability controls are inferred from repo artefacts (pipelines, dashboards-as-code) — controls configured in external tooling, with no in-repo trace, cannot be credited.
The LLM boundary
LLM-set scores this run (4): D19, D21, D22, M4 (model: Local LLM). For these, a model reads a bounded sample and sets the numeric score; each names its own sample and method on its card. They are sampled and advisory by design: they vary at the margins between runs and are never a deterministic measurement. Every other score in this report is tool-computed at confidence 1.0.
What it measures: How tangled the control flow is — methods with many branches are hard to test and change.
Method: Cyclomatic complexity per method (1 + decision points), computed exhaustively across production source; test projects separated by convention. Deterministic.
+ 16 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 Merger.merge (cyclomatic 297) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with Merger.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Builder.fromParameters (cyclomatic 197) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with Builder.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 AttributeParser.forClass (cyclomatic 65) finding(s) in Cyclomatic Complexity — start with AttributeParser.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Cyclomatic Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d1_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: How hard the code is for a person to follow, beyond raw branching.
Method: Cognitive complexity per method (Sonar-style nesting-penalized score), computed exhaustively over production code, excluding test projects. Deterministic.
+ 38 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 1 Merger.merge (cognitive 369) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with Merger.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 Builder.fromParameters (cognitive 87) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with Builder.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Resolve the 1 DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods (cognitive 71) finding(s) in Cognitive Complexity — start with DataProvider.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 warning-level).
Enforce Cognitive Complexity in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d2_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D3 · God Classes8.9 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Over-large classes that try to do too much ("god classes").
Method: God-class detection by line and method-count thresholds per logical type (partial classes unified), filtered for generated code and registration/contract false positives. Deterministic.
Resolve the 16 MethodTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with AttributeParser.php (2), Configuration.php (2), Loader.php (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (16 warning-level).
Resolve the 10 FileTooLong finding(s) in God Classes — start with Configuration.php (2), Merger.php, Assert.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (10 warning-level).
Resolve the 9 TooManyMethods finding(s) in God Classes — start with Configuration.php (2), Assert.php, Metadata.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (9 warning-level).
Enforce God Classes in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d3_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Copy-pasted code that should be shared instead.
Method: Code duplication via token-stream sliding windows with type-aware normalization (locals masked, type names preserved), density-scored per KLoC of production code. Deterministic.
64 duplicated block group(s) detected. A further 2 rows report members as variants of one another; they aggregate block groups already counted above and are not themselves counted. 17 of the 66 are in trees this repository does not ship — vendored, example/demo, fixture and benchmark code — and are ranked below the shipped groups rather than excluded from them: the duplication there is real and is still counted in this dimension's score. The dimensions that publish a production-file census leave those trees out of theirs, so this count is deliberately drawn over the wider population.
+ 35 more group(s) — more in Appendix A; the complete list is findings.md.
What to do
Resolve the 7 Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with IsIdentical.php, ByModificationTime.php, Builder.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (7 warning-level).
Resolve the 5 Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with OtrXmlLogger.php (2), CodeCoverage.php, ResultPrinter.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (5 warning-level).
Resolve the 4 Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) finding(s) in Code Duplication — start with Merger.php, Renderer.php, ResultPrinter.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (4 warning-level).
Enforce Code Duplication in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Verified — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d4_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D9 · Test Distribution10.0 / 10Exemplary✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the test suite has a healthy mix of unit / integration / end-to-end tests.
Method: Test projects classified (Unit/Integration/BDD/E2E) from compiled metadata; test methods counted exhaustively across projects with placement-agnostic disk fallback. Deterministic.
4559 test methods: 4559 unit, 0 integration, 0 BDD, 0 e2e.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d9_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D10 · Test Quality8.7 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether the tests truly assert behaviour rather than just running the code.
Method: Per-test assertions, skips, and mock references analyzed via Roslyn; structured skip-reason tags (BUG:/ENV:) separate documented deferrals from debt. Deterministic.
33 skipped (33 with a documented reason), 397 zero-assertion, no mocking-framework packages referenced (hand-written doubles or no mocking) across 4559 tests.
No assertions: testOne · ×389tests/_files/AssertionExampleTest.php:16
No assertions (declared): testOne · ×8tests/_files/Metadata/Attribute/tests/DoesNotPerformAssertionsTest.php:19
What to do
Resolve the 389 No assertions finding(s) in Test Quality — start with RequirementsTest.php (62), MockObjectTest.php (23), TestsWithCoverageMetadata.php (12). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (389 warning-level).
Enforce Test Quality in CI to reach Verified (currently Documented). — Hardens enforcement from Documented toward Prevented — provenance only; does not change the score.
Detailed fixes: d10_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether dependencies are current, secure, and not bloated.
Method: Manifest scan via dotnet list package across all projects; worst-signal-per-package deduction (saturating for vulnerabilities, capped-linear for deprecation/outdated) per KLoC. Exhaustive, deterministic.
0 outdated, 0 abandoned direct Composer dependencies. 20 of 21 direct production requirements were graded against Packagist (0 not published there, which is what a private Satis repository looks like, 1 with no release resolution). PLATFORM requirements (php, ext-*, lib-*) are deliberately not graded here: they name the runtime rather than a Packagist package, so there is no release for them to be behind — whether that runtime is still supported is a separate question with a separate remedy. Development requirements are excluded, because a consumer never installs them. A newer release is reported only where this repository's OWN constraint already admits it, so the remedy is `composer update` and never a manifest edit. Known CVEs in this dependency graph are D30's question.
What it measures: Whether any secrets (keys, tokens, passwords) have leaked into the code.
Method: In-process native secret scanner (entropy plus signature patterns) across all tracked files; no external tool. A clean result is a measured 10, not no-data zero. Deterministic.
What it measures: Files that change often and are also complex — the riskiest hotspots.
Method: Per production file churn times cyclomatic complexity over a rolling window, computed from git and Roslyn/JS/Razor analysis. Exhaustive, deterministic per commit date.
Resolve the 24 Hotspot finding(s) in Churn × Complexity Hotspots — start with ResultPrinter.php (2), Merger.php, Builder.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (24 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d15_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Acknowledged debt left in the code — TODOs, dead code, suppressed warnings.
Method: Roslyn syntactic debt markers (suppressions/TODO/FIXME/HACK/empty-catch/commented-code/Obsolete) plus SymbolFinder dead-code analysis; weighted-debt-per-KLoC density deducted 2.0x per unit. Deterministic, exhaustive.
0 deducted task-comment markers across 89399 LoC (0.0/KLoC) → score 10.0. Task comments only: this repository's language is read without a compiler, so D17's suppression, dead-code and commented-out-code arms did not run and this score counts fewer marker kinds than a .NET repository's would.
What it measures: Whether the project's documentation is clear, complete, and useful.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic doc sample (READMEs plus first 25 architecture docs), with two-pass stability filtering. Advisory, sampled.
The PHPUnit project has clear documentation: an overview page (README.md) describing what it is, its xUnit heritage, installation via PHAR or Composer, a Contribute link to CONTRIBUTING.md, and download badges; the tests/README.md covers test suite structure and how to run all suites. The architecture/design docs are absent from this summary but the outline lists them as missing (missing-architecture-docs).
Documentation: no installation or build instructions · ×2README.md
What to do
Resolve the 2 Documentation finding(s) in Documentation Quality — start with README.md (2). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d19_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D20 · ADR Quality0.0 / 10Critical✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: Whether architecture decisions are recorded well (context, decision, consequences).
Method: Per-ADR judgment by language model at low temperature with two-pass stability; confidence is share of ADRs evaluated; enforcement-field presence detected deterministically. Advisory.
What it measures: Whether names — types, methods, variables — are clear and consistent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature (0.0-0.1) on a deterministic random symbol sample (fixed size, not exhaustive), with disclosed confidence band. Advisory, sampled.
0 naming inconsistencies across 0 sampled symbols.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d21_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D22 · Internal API ConsistencyExemplary◐ Sampled · advisory
What it measures: Whether the internal API surface is consistent and coherent.
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature over a sample of the public API surface (IsPackable or .Contracts types). Sampled, advisory; confidence discounted by model uncertainty.
0 API inconsistencies across a 400-member sample of 1196 exposed types.
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d22_recommendation.md.
Do you agree with this assessment?
D27 · Navigability7.2 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
What it measures: How far you must trace to follow a call — low indirection and co-located slices read easier.
Method: Call indirection (interface hops, cross-namespace calls, slice-locality scaled) over a sampled set of method invocations, size-aware baseline. Sampled; confidence discounted by symbol-resolution gaps.
Coverage: Slice locality from the first namespace segments, SAMPLED (≤400 methods) — not exhaustive.
40 % of calls cross a namespace and 56 % go through an interface, but 99 % of collaborators are co-located — so following a call takes several hops. Baseline: small — navigation cost is tolerated.
High interface indirection
What to do
Resolve the 1 High interface indirection finding(s) in Navigability. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d27_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether any secrets were ever committed — scanned across the full git history, not just now.
Method: REDACTED scan via TWO gitleaks detect passes in an isolated checkout — the full git history, then a second --no-git pass over the working tree as it stands — merged and de-duplicated by (rule, file, line); each match flagged High. Both invocations are recorded in the audit trail. Exhaustive; when the tool is absent, or when its output cannot be parsed into the expected shape, the dimension is WITHHELD as an explicit measurement gap on our side — unscored and excluded from the lens, never a hedged middling score.
1 finding(s): 0 critical, 1 high, 0 medium, 0 low. Remediation for historically-committed secrets is credential rotation — they remain in history regardless of later deletion.
REDACTED
REDACTED
What to do
Resolve the 1 REDACTED finding(s) in Secrets (history) — start with REDACTED. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 1 Rotate the exposed credentials finding(s) in Secrets (history). — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 recommendation-level).
Detailed fixes: d28_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Real static-analysis (SAST) findings — likely security bugs in the code, any language.
Method: Polyglot static analysis via semgrep across the repo using the pinned, image-baked p/security-audit + p/owasp-top-ten rulesets (no scan-time registry fetch); severity rules (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) map to a full-band severity-weighted score. Exhaustive, deterministic; degrades on parse failure.
Coverage: semgrep pattern rules over all files — exhaustive for the rule set, blind to classes of bug without a rule (clean = no rule matched).
semgrep found no security issues. semgrep hit a parse error in 17 file(s) — `src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteBuilder.php` (line 39), `src/Framework/TestRunner/ChildProcessResultProcessor.php` (line 39), `src/Runner/Baseline/Issue.php` (line 24), `src/Runner/Baseline/Reader.php` (line 30), `src/Runner/Baseline/Writer.php` (line 24), … (+12 more) — so no absence of findings in the named regions is evidence of anything; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real. Fix the syntax error (or exclude the file deliberately) and re-scan to cover them.
What it measures: Whether any dependency has a known published vulnerability (CVE), direct or transitive, in ANY ecosystem the repository declares — Dart pub, Elixir/Hex, Go modules, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm, .NET/NuGet, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift.
Method: Dependency-CVE scan across every ecosystem the repository declares, scored ONCE. Three sources are unioned and deduplicated by advisory identity (rule id + alias closure, CVE<->GHSA) scoped to package+version, keeping the worst severity: `osv-scanner --recursive` over osv.dev for Dart pub, Elixir/Hex, Go, Java and Kotlin via Maven/Gradle, npm, PHP/Composer, Python/PyPI, RubyGems, Rust/Cargo and Swift; `trivy fs --scanners vuln` for npm lockfiles; and `dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive` for NuGet (with per-advisory collapse of the project x target-framework fan-out), plus a DECLARED-dependency arm that resolves a published gem's gemspec against rubygems.org where no Gemfile.lock is committed. `SeverityScore(c,h,m,l, normalizer 8.0)`. NotApplicable only when NO ecosystem is readable; if any applicable ecosystem could not be scanned the findings are REPORTED and the score is withheld. Supersedes the npm and OSV arms, retired 2026-09-05.
What it measures: Whether anyone still has living knowledge of each file, or it has been orphaned — last understood long ago by someone now gone quiet. The sibling of the bus factor: D16 asks who owns it, D34 asks whether anyone still knows it.
Method: File orphaning as total living-knowledge decay below one focused-commit's worth within a year, computed per-file from the D16 decay model. Exhaustive, deterministic over fixed history.
1 of 207 significant source file(s) are orphaned — their living knowledge has decayed to nothing, so no one currently understands them. The largest is src/Framework/Constraint/Operator/UnaryOperator.php. Counted over 207 of the 1062 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over.
Orphaned files with no living knowledge
✓ On the Gold path — maintain.
Detailed fixes: d34_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether files that change together actually belong together — pairs that repeatedly co-change in git history despite having no explicit code dependency, surfacing the hidden/logical coupling (and boundaries in the wrong place) a static scan can't see.
Method: Pairwise co-occurrence over the per-commit file sets in git history (production source only — tests and generated dropped): Degree-of-Coupling = shared ÷ min individual revisions, reported above noise floors (each file ≥10 revisions, ≥5 shared commits, ≥50% strength); sweeping commits excluded. Deterministic over fixed history.
Coverage: Population: PRODUCTION source files only — test and generated files are dropped before pairing, so a class co-changing with its own test (trivially ~100%) can't drown the real production↔production coupling. Pairs ranked by Degree-of-Coupling. A non-source file is never a coupling PARTICIPANT either: documentation, schemas, config and data files are dropped with the rest, so a code↔docs pair — a command and the reference page that restates it — is not reported however strongly the two co-change; nor is coupling that runs THROUGH a build step or config file.
Resolve the 1 Boundary-crossing change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with PlainTextRenderer.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (1 issue-level).
Resolve the 2 Change coupling finding(s) in Change Coupling — start with HtmlRenderer.php, PlainTextRenderer.php. — One of this dimension's main actionable groups (2 warning-level).
Detailed fixes: d35_recommendation.md · top locations in Appendix A, every location in findings.md.
What it measures: Whether the build pipeline provides supply-chain integrity — generated provenance/attestation, signed artifacts (cosign/sigstore), an SBOM, and pinned build actions. Presence of the configuration, not a runtime guarantee.
Method: Supply-chain provenance/signing read deterministically from CI/build config (.github/workflows, .gitlab-ci.yml, azure-pipelines, Jenkinsfile, .circleci) + the release surface: four signals — generated provenance/attestation (SLSA/in-toto/actions-attest), artifact signing (cosign/sigstore/gitsign), an SBOM (syft/sbom-action/*.spdx.json/*.cdx.json), and SHA-pinned build actions — scored 10·present/denom. NotApplicable without a build pipeline. Detects configuration presence, not runtime enforcement.
What it measures: Whether the repository publishes a coordinated-vulnerability-disclosure policy (SECURITY.md or security.txt) with a reporting contact, so finders know how to report a vulnerability. Presence of a policy file with a contact, not whether the policy is adequate or honoured.
Method: Vulnerability-disclosure policy read deterministically from the repo: a SECURITY.md (root/.github/docs) or .well-known/security.txt / security.txt, regex-checked for a reporting contact (email / URL / mailto). Present + contact → 10; present without a contact → 4; NotApplicable when no policy file exists (it may live off-repo). Detects the policy file's presence + contact, not its adequacy.
What it measures: Whether any dependency the repository declares is published as MALICIOUS rather than merely vulnerable — a package that is an attacker's work, in any ecosystem osv-scanner reads. Scored apart from D30 because the answer is binary: there is no safe version to upgrade to, and the fix is to remove the package and rotate every credential it could have read.
Method: The same dependency scan D30 reads, partitioned on the scanner's own classification rather than rescanned: a row is MALICIOUS when its id is in the `MAL-` space (the ossf/malicious-packages feed) OR its `database_specific.cwe_ids` carries `CWE-506` ("Embedded Malicious Code"). Both channels are structural; the summary text is deliberately NOT read, because a malicious-package record whose summary says only "Critical severity vulnerability" is a real shape ([GHSA redacted]) and a text matcher misses it. Scored BINARY: any surviving row is 0, whatever its severity and however many CVEs sit beside it — a hostile dependency is not a quantity. Applicability and degradation are D30's: NotApplicable only when no ecosystem is readable, and an unscannable ecosystem degrades rather than reading clean. SCORED, not informational.
What it measures: Whether anyone still ships security patches for the platform this repository RUNS ON — the runtime it pins and the framework majors its own constraints hold it to. Separate from D12 because the question differs: a current Django on an end-of-life Python is perfectly up to date and completely unsupported, and the fix is a migration rather than a version bump. What the repository says it merely SUPPORTS is never charged.
Method: End-of-life PLATFORM read from the repository's own declarations and graded against a FROZEN, dated table of vendor support dates — no network, no feed, no API, so this dimension answers identically inside a closed scan fence. Two subjects: a RUNTIME the project pins (a single or all-end-of-life TargetFramework, a .nvmrc or .python-version, a requires-python CAP) and a FRAMEWORK major a dependency constraint cannot move off (a caret, tilde or exact version; `vue@^2.7.16` pins Vue 2). A FLOOR is deliberately never charged — `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what a package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on — and a multi-target project is charged only when EVERY target is out of support. Runtime 4.0/product capped 8.0, framework 1.5 capped 4.5. The table is safe to freeze because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false: it loses recall as it ages, never precision, and a test asserts every entry predates the freeze date. Disjoint from D31 (a container image's OS layer) and D29 (the toolchain a CI workflow installs). Abstains when the repository declares no platform this pass reads — never scores it clean.
0 end-of-life runtime(s) and 0 end-of-life framework(s), read from 0 platform declaration(s) and 21 dependency declaration(s). This dimension reads what the repository says about ITSELF — a pinned target framework, a version file, a capped requires-python, a framework major a constraint cannot move off. A FLOOR is deliberately never charged: `requires-python = ">=3.8"` states what the package SUPPORTS, not what it runs on, and a well-maintained library declares exactly that while running its own CI on a current release. The end-of-life facts are FROZEN and dated, so this dimension needs no network and answers identically inside a closed scan fence; as the table ages it loses recall and never precision, because a statement about support that ended in the past cannot become false. The OS layer of a container image is D31's question and the toolchain a CI workflow installs is D29's; this row is neither.
Other · Architecture — How the codebase splits by code ROLE — domain, application, infrastructure, test, generated. The significance map behind the knowledge/coupling weighting, and a DDD signal in its own right: a thin domain core under fat infrastructure is the anemic-domain smell, quantified. How each file's role is decided, because the split is only as good as that: a generated name or a build-output tree makes it Generated, a test project makes it Test, and otherwise the file's NAMESPACE and PATH words are matched against fixed vocabularies in a fixed ORDER — domain, then infrastructure, then application — so a file whose words hit two layers is counted under the earlier one. A production file matching none of them counts as application, so that share reads 'application or unclassified' rather than a measured application layer. Roles come from naming convention, never from what the code does. On this repository the split was taken from the source tree on disk rather than from a loaded .NET workspace, so a file's role is decided by its PATH segments alone — no declared namespace was available to add to the evidence — and generated output is excluded from the census entirely rather than counted as a generated share.
Method: Roslyn line-count by code ROLE: every source file classified Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated by namespace + path convention (the shared CodeRoleClassifier), then significant lines summed per role. Deterministic; the advisory score is the business-logic (domain+application) share of production code.
Coverage: Population: ALL source files, each bucketed into ONE of five roles (Domain/Application/Infrastructure/Test/Generated) by namespace + path convention — a file whose layer isn't named in the convention falls to Application (the neutral default), and the split is line-count, not semantic depth or business value.
What to do
The domain core is a small share of production code, but most of the rest matched no layer vocabulary at all — so this is not yet an anemic-domain finding. The namespace/path convention could not place that code, which makes the composition above a statement about the naming, not about the design. Name the layers (or check that the repository's conventions differ from the ones this check knows) before reading a thin domain into it.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the repo and its projects have a README, and whether it's substantive and current.
Method: Filesystem scan: README presence, word count, and headings for depth; git history for staleness. Exhaustive across root and project dirs, deterministic.
What to do
Add a 'Testing' section to the root README — how to run the test suite.
Add an 'Architecture' / 'How it works' section to the root README — the high-level shape.
Add a README to the 1 of 1 project(s) that lack one — worth up to 2 pts.
Maturity · Maturity — Whether key decisions (ADRs) and the high-level shape (C4/diagrams) are written down.
Method: Filesystem scan: ADR folder/naming conventions or content, plus Mermaid/PlantUML/C4/architecture.md discovery. Exhaustive, deterministic.
No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
What to do
Record significant decisions one document per decision — dated, stating the context, the decision and its consequences — and keep them together wherever your design docs already live (a conventional `docs/adr/` tree, with each file named `NNNN-title` in whatever markup those docs already use, is the most discoverable form).
Maturity · Maturity — Whether the README actually describes the code that exists (LLM-judged, advisory).
Method: Judged by language model at low temperature: README accuracy versus actual projects, within a disclosed tolerance. Advisory, not a measured number.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether SAST, secret/dependency scanning and performance benchmarking are wired in (presence, not runtime).
Method: Filesystem scan: SAST configuration, dependency-update automation, secret scanning, and a benchmark harness or benchmark step — in this repository's own ecosystem. Exhaustive, deterministic.
What to do
Add gitleaks/trufflehog in CI to block PRs that introduce committed secrets.
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are automated and safely reversible (probes, rolling updates, approval gates) — from manifests/pipeline files, not the live environment.
Method: Filesystem scan: deployment manifests/IaC (K8s YAML, Helm, Terraform) for rolling updates, probes, approval gates, migration hooks. Exhaustive, deterministic.
The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release.
What to do
Nothing pauses a release for a human: publish as a draft release (or gate the release job on a protected tag/manual dispatch) so a bad build can be stopped before users can download it.
Do you agree with this assessment?
P6 · Release Hygiene8.0 / 10Strong✓ Tool-verified
Readiness · Readiness — Whether releases are traceable — a maintained changelog and explicit version stamping.
Method: Filesystem scan: changelog file presence and version tags in csproj or git tags. Exhaustive, deterministic.
The changelog this check read carries 2 versioned entries, against a bar of 3. Counted as either an `x.y.z` string or a version-shaped section heading (`## [1.2.0]`, `## V14.x.x`, `## Updates in 8.0.x`), whichever is the larger — so a log sectioned by minor series counts its sections, not its individual patch numbers. Entries recorded somewhere this check does not read — release notes generated at tag time from a generator config it did not recognise, or a log kept outside the repository — are not counted here, and this row is about what is re-findable in the tree rather than about how often you release.
What to do
Keep the changelog current — add a versioned entry (Keep-a-Changelog ## [x.y.z]) for each release so the history isn't a stub.
Do you agree with this assessment?
Reference — by lens
The score is the rank-weighted fold of these lenses (worst-heaviest), each including its meta-dimensions; a lens with a Critical contributor is capped at Fair (its band reads "gated by …") and is never the strongest area however high its average.
Capped at Fair by a Critical contributor — resolve it before relying on this lens.
Unscored — 1 check(s) recorded observations but carry no score
These checks ran and found something, but they do not carry a score — either by design (an advisory check reports evidence rather than grading it) or because they could not be scored here. They are excluded from the score for that reason, not because there was nothing to see.
P12 CI test-gate honesty — 1 observation(s) recorded · Reported, not scored — this card publishes what the CI gate does with the test inventory rather than grading it. The findings above are its output.
Not evidenced — 4 control(s) we could not find positive evidence for
These checks grade a working control, and the repository shows no evidence of one. That is deliberately not scored as a zero: a repository cannot show an ops runbook, a database TTL or an infrastructure-side audit log, so absence of evidence here is not evidence the control is missing. It is also not a statement that the check is irrelevant to this codebase — the thing it grades applies; we just could not see it. Excluded from the score either way.
C3 Audit Trail — Not assessed: these audit controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks audit controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C4 Data Retention — Not assessed: these retention controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks retention controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C5 Data-Subject Rights — Not assessed: these data-subject rights controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks data-subject rights controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
P5 DR & Backup — not evidenced — repo shows no backup/RTO/RPO controls; absence of evidence is not evidence of a working control
Not included — 77 check(s) not relevant to this codebase
These checks had nothing to measure here (no tests, no git history, the codebase is small, or the architecture style doesn't apply), so they're omitted above rather than scored low.
AC1 Text alternatives — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC2 Forms & labels — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC3 Page structure — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC4 Keyboard semantics — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC5 ARIA correctness — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC6 Visual & motion safety — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AC7 A11y enforcement — No web markup found — accessibility is not applicable to this repository.
AX1 Captive dependencies — no DI registrations detected
AX2 Stateful singletons — no singleton implementations detected
AX3 Project dependency cycles — not assessed — project cycles and dependency direction are computed over a project-reference graph that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository commits no project file of a kind this check models. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX4 Dependency direction — not assessed — project cycles and dependency direction are computed over a project-reference graph that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository commits no project file of a kind this check models. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX5 Architecture & structure — not assessed — architecture style/structure is computed from a project graph (projects, types, module namespaces) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX6 Interface segregation — not assessed — interface segregation is computed over a type surface that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX7 Slice cohesion — not applicable — not a vertical-slice architecture
AX8 Test isolation — not assessed — test isolation is computed from a project graph (which projects are test projects, and what they reference) that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository commits no project file of a kind this check models. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
AX9 CQS / query purity — no CQRS query handlers detected — query purity is not applicable to this codebase
AXB2 Runtime readiness — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
C1 Data Protection — Not assessed: these personal data controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks personal data controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
C2 Access Controls — Not assessed: these authorization controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks authorization controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
D11 Test Reliability — Test reliability not included — no .php test runner
D14 License Compliance — Package manifest not parsed for licence data — analyzer language-coverage gap
D16 Bus Factor — single-maintainer repository — bus factor is not applicable
D18 Solution Shape — D18 scores the shape of a .NET solution; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D23 Boundary Type-Coupling — Production source is present (.php) but bounded contexts are resolved over the C#/VB project set, which exposed none, so context scope could not be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a verdict about this repository. Declaring the codebase's bounded contexts (≥2) would let cross-boundary type coupling be assessed — see the recommendation on this dimension for where. Declare them in `.codehealth/config.yaml` at the repository root (create it if absent), mapping each context name to the module-path or namespace prefixes that belong to it — e.g. `architecture:` → `contexts:` → `Billing: ["src/billing", "Acme.Billing"]`, `Catalog: ["src/catalog", "Acme.Catalog"]`.
D24 Comment Value — No inline comments to assess — comment value is not applicable here.
D25 ADR Conformance — no ADRs to check
D26 Project Cohesion — Project cohesion is assessed over the .NET project set; this target exposed no projects, so project size and spread could not be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer's reach, not a verdict about this repository.
D31 IaC & Container Security — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
D32 Data Compliance (PII/GDPR) — 427 file(s) were not parsed by semgrep — the PII/GDPR ruleset never ran over them
D39 IL Efficiency — D39 measures the IL emitted by a .NET build; this repository has no .NET solution or project files, so the dimension does not apply.
D40 Network Egress Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
D41 Kernel & Syscall Confinement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
D42 Runtime Threat Enforcement — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
D5 Coupling — Inter-project coupling could not be assessed — no analyzable project graph was found for this repository. Not scored: a gap in the analyzer's reach, not a verdict about this repository. (Coupling here is Martin afferent/efferent/instability plus reference cycles across a project-reference graph, read today from .NET project files; other ecosystems' module graphs are not read yet.)
D6 Cohesion (LCOM4) — Cohesion (LCOM4) is measured over a CS/VB/GO/SCALA/SWIFT/DART class graph, and this repository's production source is .php, which this pass does not read — so no class could be assessed. Not scored — this is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
D7 Architectural Integrity — no checkable ADRs, and no project-reference graph for the cycle pass to read — so this dimension makes no claim about dependency cycles in either direction (where this repository's language has an import-cycle lens, cycles are reported there). Architectural integrity not assessed
D8 Code Coverage — Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
DM1 Domain Modelling — applicable but not scored (2 of 3 signals for this style — below the bar we score at): 662 value object(s); 96 domain event(s)
ED1 Event-Driven — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
ED5 Idempotency — This check finds retry-prone mutations (command handlers and message/event consumers) by walking the repository's declared types, and none was loaded here, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
ES1 Event Sourcing — not scored — this repository shows none of the 3 signals this lens looks for
GD1 Unfinished & placeholder code — no source files were read — this check reads C# syntax, and none was loaded for this repository. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
IC1 Incompleteness & stubs — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P2 Observability — Observability was not assessed: this check reads a source model that does not carry this repository's product — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of a logging idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repo lacks structured logging (it may log through its own ecosystem's logger). This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository.
P7 Outbound HTTP resilience — not measured — the application kind could not be determined for this repo
P8 Schema migrations — not assessed — schema-migration practice is read from a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
P9 Domain vs controller coverage — no coverage report found on disk — produce a coverage report in a standard format (Clover XML — with Xdebug (`XDEBUG_MODE=coverage`) or PCOV installed, `vendor/bin/phpunit --coverage-clover coverage.xml`) and commit it — a hosted scan measures a clone of the repository, so a report that exists only in a working tree, a CI runner's or your own, never reaches it; the artefact is commonly gitignored, so `git add -f` that one file (or un-ignore its path) and commit it alongside the code it measures, or wire coverage collection into CI, to enable this cross-layer check
PF1 Benchmark discipline — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
PF2 Allocation hygiene — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
PF3 Async & latency hygiene — Performance was not assessed: this lens reads a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this lens does not yet model or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository — in particular it is NOT a statement that this repo is unpackaged or performance-careless.
S1 Web-Security Posture — Not assessed: these web-security controls are read from a source model (declarative annotations, request middleware, entity/column names, guard methods) that was not loaded for this repository — because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. Absence of an idiom this check recognises is NOT evidence that this repository lacks web-security controls: it may implement them entirely in its own ecosystem. This is a gap in the analyzer's language coverage, not a finding about this repository.
X1 Async correctness — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X12 Unreachable branch — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X13 Undrained process stream — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X14 Bypassable address classification — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X15 Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X16 Unfloored truncation loop — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X17 Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X18 Disposal-pattern correctness — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X19 Unrestored process-global state — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X2 Cancellation propagation — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X20 Mistyped argument guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X21 Side-effecting pattern guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X22 Contradicted release guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X23 Unguarded diagnostic materialisation — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X24 Document value interpolated into markup unescaped — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X25 Inert configuration knob — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X26 Unsynchronised callback handoff — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X27 Collection changed while being enumerated — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X28 Index access outside its own emptiness guard — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X29 Per-element action decided by a fixed element — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X3 Exception handling — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X30 Support guard that admits what it rejects — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X32 Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly — This check reads C# syntax; no C# was loaded for this repository, so it has nothing to report. That is a limit of the analyzer, not a finding about your code.
X4 Structured logging — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X5 Nullable reference types — not analysed — these correctness checks read a source model that was not loaded for this repository, because the repository is written in a language this check does not yet model, or because its projects failed to load. This is a gap in the analyzer, not a finding about this repository
X9 Subsumed condition operand — Advisory — this card reports evidence and never carries a score, so there is nothing missing here.
Appendix A — Findings (grouped)
The findings behind the scores, grouped by severity, then by dimension and kind. The high-severity issues are enumerated in full below; items per group are capped at 25 with any overflow stated explicitly per group, never silently truncated. The complete machine-readable list of every finding (all severities) is the companion findings.md in this report's bundle.
Boundary-crossing change coupling: PlainTextRenderer.php ↔ ResultPrinter.php src/Logging/TestDox/PlainTextRenderer.php— `src/Logging/TestDox/PlainTextRenderer.php` (context Logging) and `src/TextUI/Output/TestDox/ResultPrinter.php` (context TextUI) sit in DIFFERENT parts of the tree yet change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well, and counted over this repository's 10,000 most recent commits rather than its whole history — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) — the bounded-context boundary may be in the wrong place, or one context is leaking into the other. This is the behavioural boundary violation a static scan can't see. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `9b47f392` Do not collapse separate test classes into a single group when their …; `140306f0` Refactor; `a13a4f21` Refactor — run `git show` on any of them.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/AssertionExampleTest.php:16— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoverageFunctionTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoverageMethodTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoverageNoneTest.php:16— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoverageTraitTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoveredClassUsingCoveredTraitTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoversClassOnClassTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/CoversNothingOnClassTest.php:18— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/DataProviderAndTestWithMixedTest.php:25— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testDependency tests/_files/DataProviderDependencyTest.php:32— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: provider tests/_files/DataProviderMethodHasTestAttributeTest.php:19— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testWithDataProviderThatThrows tests/_files/DataProviderRequiresPhpUnitTest.php:51— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testWithDataProviderExternalThatThrows tests/_files/DataProviderRequiresPhpUnitTest.php:57— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testNothing tests/_files/DoNoAssertionTestCase.php:16— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test tests/_files/DuplicateKeyDataProviderTest.php:26— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testCase tests/_files/EmptyDataProviderTest.php:23— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test tests/_files/EmptyStringKeyDataProviderClosureTest.php:22— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test tests/_files/EmptyStringKeyDataProviderTest.php:24— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testNestedExceptions tests/_files/ExceptionStackTest.php:31— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/Failure.php:16— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testSomething tests/_files/Inheritance/InheritanceB.php:16— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: test2 tests/_files/InheritedTestCase.php:14— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/InterfaceAsTargetWithAttributeTest.php:21— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/InvalidClassTargetWithAttributeTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
No assertions: testOne tests/_files/InvalidFunctionTargetTest.php:20— This method's body runs code, and no assertion call was recognised in it. Recognised by name: Assert*, *Should*/ShouldBe*, Verify, Expect, Throws, Record, Received/DidNotReceive, MustHaveHappened/MustNotHaveHappened, EnsureSuccessStatusCode and *AndEnsure* — so verification routed through a helper of your own naming, through a base-class or callback object whose members hold the assertions, or through a harness that fails by throwing under some other name, is not visible to this check and is not counted here. Read it as 'no assertion this check knows how to see', and if that is right, add one.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:59— src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php changed 15 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 297 in Merger.merge at line 59. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:276— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php changed 14 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 197 in Builder.fromParameters at line 276. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Application.php src/TextUI/Application.php:141— src/TextUI/Application.php changed 32 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 34 in Application.run at line 141. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Application.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Framework/TestRunner/TestRunner.php src/Framework/TestRunner/TestRunner.php:100— src/Framework/TestRunner/TestRunner.php changed 15 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 48 in TestRunner.runInProcess at line 100. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Framework/TestRunner/TestRunner.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:150— src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php changed 6 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 65 in AttributeParser.forClass at line 150. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1383— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php changed 14 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 21 in Loader.testSuite at line 1383. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Runner/TestIndex/TestIndex.php src/Runner/TestIndex/TestIndex.php:263— src/Runner/TestIndex/TestIndex.php changed 8 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 26 in TestIndex.entryFromArray at line 263. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Runner/TestIndex/TestIndex.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/TestSuiteMapper.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/TestSuiteMapper.php:62— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/TestSuiteMapper.php changed 9 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 21 in TestSuiteMapper.map at line 62. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/TestSuiteMapper.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/TestSuiteBuilder.php src/TextUI/Configuration/TestSuiteBuilder.php:61— src/TextUI/Configuration/TestSuiteBuilder.php changed 10 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 18 in TestSuiteBuilder.build at line 61. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/TestSuiteBuilder.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:154— src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php changed 9 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 18 in ErrorHandler.__invoke at line 154. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:331— src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php changed 6 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 25 in CodeCoverage.generateReports at line 331. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Framework/TestBuilder.php src/Framework/TestBuilder.php:66— src/Framework/TestBuilder.php changed 8 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 18 in TestBuilder.build at line 66. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Framework/TestBuilder.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:364— src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php changed 3 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 40 in Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass at line 364. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php:27— src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 57 in ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate at line 27. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:128— src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 25 in ResultPrinter.printSummaryLine at line 128. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php:66— src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php changed 3 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 32 in Requirements.requirementsNotSatisfiedFor at line 66. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Configuration/ExecutionOrderParser.php src/TextUI/Configuration/ExecutionOrderParser.php:63— src/TextUI/Configuration/ExecutionOrderParser.php changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 20 in ExecutionOrderParser.parse at line 63. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Configuration/ExecutionOrderParser.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Runner/TestRunHistory/DefaultTestRunHistory.php src/Runner/TestRunHistory/DefaultTestRunHistory.php:179— src/Runner/TestRunHistory/DefaultTestRunHistory.php changed 5 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 16 in DefaultTestRunHistory.writeToFile at line 179. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Runner/TestRunHistory/DefaultTestRunHistory.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:230— src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php changed 3 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 20 in Facade.createResultPrinter at line 230. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Logging/TestDox/NamePrettifier.php src/Logging/TestDox/NamePrettifier.php:269— src/Logging/TestDox/NamePrettifier.php changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in NamePrettifier.mapTestMethodParameterNamesToProvidedDataValues at line 269. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Logging/TestDox/NamePrettifier.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Util/PHP/JobRunner.php src/Util/PHP/JobRunner.php:238— src/Util/PHP/JobRunner.php changed 4 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in JobRunner.buildCommand at line 238. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Util/PHP/JobRunner.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/TestSuiteFilterProcessor.php src/TextUI/TestSuiteFilterProcessor.php:42— src/TextUI/TestSuiteFilterProcessor.php changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 25 in TestSuiteFilterProcessor.process at line 42. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/TestSuiteFilterProcessor.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/Util/GlobalState.php src/Util/GlobalState.php:196— src/Util/GlobalState.php changed 3 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 15 in GlobalState.processIncludedFilesAsString at line 196. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/Util/GlobalState.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
Hotspot: src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:94— src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 21 in ResultPrinter.print at line 94. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-06-28..2026-09-26, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with `git log --since='2026-06-28 00:25:25 +00:00' --until='2026-09-26 00:25:25 +00:00' --full-history --no-merges -- src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php`: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each — a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window.
MethodTooLong: Merger.merge src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:59— MethodTooLong — merge runs 992 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 892 over it, 9.92× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Builder.fromParameters src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:276— MethodTooLong — fromParameters runs 902 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 802 over it, 9.02× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AttributeParser.forMethod src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:627— MethodTooLong — forMethod runs 301 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 201 over it, 3.01× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: AttributeParser.forClass src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:150— MethodTooLong — forClass runs 279 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 179 over it, 2.79× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Help.elements src/TextUI/Help.php:168— MethodTooLong — elements runs 181 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 81 over it, 1.81× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:87— MethodTooLong — dataProvidedByMethods runs 173 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 73 over it, 1.73× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Configuration.__construct src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php:582— MethodTooLong — __construct runs 173 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 73 over it, 1.73× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Configuration.__construct src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Configuration.php:243— MethodTooLong — __construct runs 151 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 51 over it, 1.51× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Loader.codeCoverage src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:466— MethodTooLong — codeCoverage runs 150 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 50 over it, 1.50× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: DefaultConfiguration.create src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/DefaultConfiguration.php:36— MethodTooLong — create runs 148 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 48 over it, 1.48× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Application.run src/TextUI/Application.php:141— MethodTooLong — run runs 147 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 47 over it, 1.47× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Loader.phpunit src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1120— MethodTooLong — phpunit runs 145 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 45 over it, 1.45× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: CodeCoverage.generateReports src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:331— MethodTooLong — generateReports runs 122 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.22× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:364— MethodTooLong — generateCodeForTestDoubleClass runs 118 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.18× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php:27— MethodTooLong — calculate runs 111 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 11 over it, 1.11× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
MethodTooLong: Facade.registerDefaultTypes src/Event/Facade.php:190— MethodTooLong — registerDefaultTypes runs 102 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2 over it, 1.02× the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body — the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name — into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order.
FileTooLong: Cli/Configuration.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Configuration.php— FileTooLong — 1132 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 632 over it, 2.26× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Configuration/Merger.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php— FileTooLong — 1062 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 562 over it, 2.12× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Framework/Assert.php src/Framework/Assert.php— FileTooLong — 1047 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 94% of them inside a single declaration: Assert (75-3332). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 547 over it, 2.09× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: Cli/Builder.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php— FileTooLong — 1025 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 98% of them inside a single declaration: Builder (36-1698). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 525 over it, 2.05× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: Xml/Loader.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php— FileTooLong — 952 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 452 over it, 1.90× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Configuration/Configuration.php src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php— FileTooLong — 891 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 391 over it, 1.78× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Parser/AttributeParser.php src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php— FileTooLong — 791 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 87% of them inside a single declaration: AttributeParser (119-1385). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 291 over it, 1.58× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: TextUI/Application.php src/TextUI/Application.php— FileTooLong — 719 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 219 over it, 1.44× the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them.
FileTooLong: Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php src/Event/Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php— FileTooLong — 679 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 96% of them inside a single declaration: DispatchingEmitter (42-1697). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 179 over it, 1.36× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
FileTooLong: Runner/ErrorHandler.php src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php— FileTooLong — 556 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 91% of them inside a single declaration: ErrorHandler (68-1205). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 56 over it, 1.11× the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body — the parts that share the same inputs and are named together — into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them.
TooManyMethods: Configuration src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Configuration.php:19— TooManyMethods — 283 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 253 over it, 9.43× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Assert src/Framework/Assert.php:75— TooManyMethods — 249 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 219 over it, 8.30× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Configuration src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php:21— TooManyMethods — 223 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 193 over it, 7.43× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Metadata src/Metadata/Metadata.php:21— TooManyMethods — 155 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 125 over it, 5.17× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: DispatchingEmitter src/Event/Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php:42— TooManyMethods — 98 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 68 over it, 3.27× the bar. Most of these members implement Event.Emitter (96 of 98 members), so moving them onto a smaller type would remove them from that contract rather than reduce it. To reduce it, split the contract instead: give each cohesive group of operations its own smaller interface and its own implementing type. Where the contract has to stay whole, move the work behind these members into collaborator types, so what is left here is a forward per member rather than a responsibility per member.
TooManyMethods: ErrorHandler src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:68— TooManyMethods — 41 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 11 over it, 1.37× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: ProgressPrinter src/TextUI/Output/Default/ProgressPrinter/ProgressPrinter.php:39— TooManyMethods — 35 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 5 over it, 1.17× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Application src/TextUI/Application.php:129— TooManyMethods — 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
TooManyMethods: Loader src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:95— TooManyMethods — 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: Builder src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:36— ClassTooLong — 1005 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 7 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 605 over it, 2.51× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: Assert src/Framework/Assert.php:75— ClassTooLong — 986 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 249 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 586 over it, 2.47× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: AttributeParser src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:119— ClassTooLong — 688 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 12 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 288 over it, 1.72× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: DispatchingEmitter src/Event/Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php:42— ClassTooLong — 653 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 98 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 253 over it, 1.63× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ErrorHandler src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:68— ClassTooLong — 508 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 41 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 108 over it, 1.27× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: Generator src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:62— ClassTooLong — 441 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 41 over it, 1.10× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
ClassTooLong: ResultPrinter src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:56— ClassTooLong — 419 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 30 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 19 over it, 1.05× the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/Framework/Constraint/IsIdentical.php:108— src/Framework/Constraint/IsIdentical.php:108-122 | src/Framework/Constraint/IsIdentical.php:129-143 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/Runner/ExecutionOrder/Stage/ByModificationTime.php:80— src/Runner/ExecutionOrder/Stage/ByModificationTime.php:80-94 | src/Runner/ExecutionOrder/Stage/BySize.php:57-71 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:306— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:306-320 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:401-415 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php:693— src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php:693-707 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/PHPUnit.php:224-238 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Help.php:78— src/TextUI/Help.php:78-92 | src/TextUI/Help.php:116-130 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Help.php:78` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/Default/ProgressPrinter/ProgressPrinter.php:147— src/TextUI/Output/Default/ProgressPrinter/ProgressPrinter.php:147-161 | src/TextUI/Output/Default/ProgressPrinter/ProgressPrinter.php:172-186 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (15 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageHtmlToReport.php:24— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageHtmlToReport.php:24-38 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageTextToReport.php:24-38 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageHtmlToReport.php:24` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:256— src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:256-269 | src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:271-284 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:242— src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:242-255 | src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:268-281 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:242` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php:91— src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php:91-104 | src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIsOrContains.php:96-109 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php` and `src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIsOrContains.php` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:283— src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:283-296 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:312-325 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (14 lines × 2) src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:403— src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:403-416 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:421-434 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:334— src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:334-344 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:382-392 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:381` calls `elseif` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:332` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/Compact/Renderer.php:38— src/TextUI/Output/Compact/Renderer.php:38-48 | src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:685-695 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:333— src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:333-343 | src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:367-377 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:333` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (11 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemovePrinterAttributes.php:25— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemovePrinterAttributes.php:25-35 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveTestSuiteLoaderAttributes.php:25-35 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:204— src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:204-230 | src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:312-338 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:204` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1425— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1425-1451 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1474-1500 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (27 lines × 2) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/DeprecationTriggered.php:137— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/DeprecationTriggered.php:137-163 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpDeprecationTriggered.php:120-146 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/DeprecationTriggered.php` and `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpDeprecationTriggered.php` as WHOLE FILES: 95% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:1245— src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:1245-1251 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:1270-1276 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) src/Runner/DeprecationCollector/Collector.php:68— src/Runner/DeprecationCollector/Collector.php:68-74 | src/Runner/DeprecationCollector/InIsolationCollector.php:57-63 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Runner/DeprecationCollector/Collector.php` and `src/Runner/DeprecationCollector/InIsolationCollector.php` as WHOLE FILES: 95% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveListeners.php:24— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveListeners.php:24-30 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveTestDoxGroupsElement.php:24-30 — before extracting anything, compare `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveListeners.php` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveTestDoxGroupsElement.php` as WHOLE FILES: 86% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:61— src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:61-66 | src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:280-285 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:384— src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:384-389 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:727-732 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 2) src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteForTestClass.php:36— src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteForTestClass.php:36-41 | src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteForTestMethodWithDataProvider.php:42-47 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCoverageElementCacheDirectoryAttribute.php:24— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCoverageElementCacheDirectoryAttribute.php:24-32 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCoverageElementProcessUncoveredFilesAttribute.php:24-32 — before extracting anything, compare `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCoverageElementCacheDirectoryAttribute.php` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCoverageElementProcessUncoveredFilesAttribute.php` as WHOLE FILES: 87% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteBuilder.php:72— src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteBuilder.php:72-80 | src/Event/Value/TestSuite/TestSuiteBuilder.php:112-120 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 2) src/Framework/DataProviderTestSuite.php:41— src/Framework/DataProviderTestSuite.php:41-49 | src/Framework/IterativeTestSuite.php:41-49 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once.
Change coupling: HtmlRenderer.php ↔ PlainTextRenderer.php src/Logging/TestDox/HtmlRenderer.php— `src/Logging/TestDox/HtmlRenderer.php` and `src/Logging/TestDox/PlainTextRenderer.php` change together 75% of the time (9 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well, and counted over this repository's 10,000 most recent commits rather than its whole history — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets). They sit in the same directory, and in this ecosystem sibling files there normally share one namespace/package — so a direct reference between them needs no import and this pass cannot see whether one exists. Read the pair before acting: if one file only DECLARES what the other consumes (a constants/types file beside its user), the co-change is definitional and the question is whether the split earns its keep; if they duplicate structure, extract the common part into a shared function or type they both call; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 9 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `9b47f392` Do not collapse separate test classes into a single group when their …; `26b00375` Avoid duplicate list elements; `140306f0` Refactor — run `git show` on any of them.
Change coupling: PlainTextRenderer.php ↔ TestResultCollector.php src/Logging/TestDox/PlainTextRenderer.php— `src/Logging/TestDox/PlainTextRenderer.php` and `src/Logging/TestDox/TestResult/TestResultCollector.php` change together 50% of the time (6 of the 12 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well, and counted over this repository's 10,000 most recent commits rather than its whole history — a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency — the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE — the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import — and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 6 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are `9b47f392` Do not collapse separate test classes into a single group when their …; `140306f0` Refactor (at that commit the file was still `src/Logging/TestDox/TestMethod/TestResultCollector.php`); `a13a4f21` Refactor (at that commit the file was still `src/Logging/TestDox/TestMethod/TestResultCollector.php`) — run `git show` on any of them.
D4 · Code Duplication· Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) · ×2
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBackupStaticAttributesAttribute.php:25— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBackupStaticAttributesAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBeStrictAboutCoversAnnotationAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameCacheResultAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameForceCoversAnnotationAttribute.php:25-40 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50+ identical tokens) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:107— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:107-129 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/WarningTriggered.php:107-129 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpNoticeTriggered.php:105-127 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpWarningTriggered.php:105-127 — These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below — it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members' grain — factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times.
Duplicated block (33 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:790— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:790-822 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1057-1089 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (33 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:785— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:785-817 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1107-1139 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) src/Metadata/RequiresEnvironmentVariable.php:30— src/Metadata/RequiresEnvironmentVariable.php:30-51 | src/Metadata/WithEnvironmentVariable.php:30-51 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Metadata/RequiresEnvironmentVariable.php` and `src/Metadata/WithEnvironmentVariable.php` as WHOLE FILES: 94% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Metadata/RequiresEnvironmentVariable.php:30` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (22 lines × 2) src/Framework/TestRunner/ChildProcessResultProcessor.php:90— src/Framework/TestRunner/ChildProcessResultProcessor.php:90-111 | src/Framework/TestRunner/ChildProcessResultProcessor.php:129-150 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any `return` inside it is the body's own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit.
Duplicated block (31 lines × 3) src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/DirectoryCollectionIterator.php:34— src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/DirectoryCollectionIterator.php:34-64 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FilterDirectoryCollectionIterator.php:34-64 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/TestDirectoryCollectionIterator.php:34-64 — before extracting anything, compare `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/DirectoryCollectionIterator.php` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FilterDirectoryCollectionIterator.php` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/DirectoryCollectionIterator.php:34` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (31 lines × 3) src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FileCollectionIterator.php:34— src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FileCollectionIterator.php:34-64 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FilterFileCollectionIterator.php:34-64 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/TestFileCollectionIterator.php:34-64 — before extracting anything, compare `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FileCollectionIterator.php` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FilterFileCollectionIterator.php` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Value/FileCollectionIterator.php:34` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageCloverToReport.php:24— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageCloverToReport.php:24-37 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoveragePhpToReport.php:24-36 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageXmlToReport.php:24-36 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/CoverageCloverToReport.php:24` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 3) src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:524— src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:524-536 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:599-611 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:644-656 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:524` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Merger.merge (cyclomatic 297) src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:59— Merger.merge has cyclomatic complexity 297 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Builder.fromParameters (cyclomatic 197) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:276— Builder.fromParameters has cyclomatic complexity 197 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
AttributeParser.forClass (cyclomatic 65) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:150— AttributeParser.forClass has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
AttributeParser.forMethod (cyclomatic 65) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:627— AttributeParser.forMethod has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate (cyclomatic 57) src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php:27— ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate has cyclomatic complexity 57 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass (cyclomatic 40) src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:364— Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
IssueFilter.shouldBeProcessed (cyclomatic 38) src/Runner/IssueFilter.php:36— IssueFilter.shouldBeProcessed has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods (cyclomatic 35) src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:87— DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ReturnValueGenerator.generate (cyclomatic 34) src/Framework/MockObject/Runtime/ReturnValueGenerator.php:41— ReturnValueGenerator.generate has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Application.run (cyclomatic 34) src/TextUI/Application.php:141— Application.run has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Requirements.requirementsNotSatisfiedFor (cyclomatic 32) src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php:66— Requirements.requirementsNotSatisfiedFor has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
CodeCoverage.generateReports (cyclomatic 25) src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:331— CodeCoverage.generateReports has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ResultPrinter.printSummaryLine (cyclomatic 25) src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:128— ResultPrinter.printSummaryLine has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Loader.testSuite (cyclomatic 21) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1383— Loader.testSuite has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
ResultPrinter.print (cyclomatic 21) src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:94— ResultPrinter.print has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
ExecutionOrderParser.parse (cyclomatic 20) src/TextUI/Configuration/ExecutionOrderParser.php:63— ExecutionOrderParser.parse has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform — the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own — a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing.
Facade.createResultPrinter (cyclomatic 20) src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:230— Facade.createResultPrinter has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
ErrorHandler.__invoke (cyclomatic 18) src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:154— ErrorHandler.__invoke has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
ErrorHandler.handleNonTestCaseIssue (cyclomatic 18) src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:331— ErrorHandler.handleNonTestCaseIssue has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions.
Application.testRunHistoryMayBePruned (cyclomatic 16) src/TextUI/Application.php:943— Application.testRunHistoryMayBePruned has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
SourceMapper.map (cyclomatic 16) src/TextUI/Configuration/SourceMapper.php:82— SourceMapper.map has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top.
Merger.merge (cognitive 369) src/TextUI/Configuration/Merger.php:59— Merger.merge has cognitive complexity 369 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 249 (286 pts), boolean chains 68, loops 10 (14 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 41). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
Builder.fromParameters (cognitive 87) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:276— Builder.fromParameters has cognitive complexity 87 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 28 (73 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 2, match/switch 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 46). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods (cognitive 71) src/Metadata/Api/DataProvider.php:87— DataProvider.dataProvidedByMethods has cognitive complexity 71 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (53 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 3 (6 pts), loops 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 37). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Requirements.requirementsNotSatisfiedFor (cognitive 69) src/Metadata/Api/Requirements.php:66— Requirements.requirementsNotSatisfiedFor has cognitive complexity 69 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 23 (59 pts), boolean chains 5, ternaries 1 (4 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 39). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Loader.testSuite (cognitive 62) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1383— Loader.testSuite has cognitive complexity 62 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (47 pts), loops 6 (15 pts) (nesting depth added 42). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate (cognitive 56) src/TextUI/ShellExitCodeCalculator.php:27— ShellExitCodeCalculator.calculate has cognitive complexity 56 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 43, boolean chains 13. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass (cognitive 55) src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:364— Generator.generateCodeForTestDoubleClass has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (37 pts), boolean chains 11, loops 4 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ReturnValueGenerator.generate (cognitive 53) src/Framework/MockObject/Runtime/ReturnValueGenerator.php:41— ReturnValueGenerator.generate has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 21 (40 pts), boolean chains 9, loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
IssueFilter.shouldBeProcessed (cognitive 52) src/Runner/IssueFilter.php:36— IssueFilter.shouldBeProcessed has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 22 (37 pts), boolean chains 15 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Application.run (cognitive 38) src/TextUI/Application.php:141— Application.run has cognitive complexity 38 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (21 pts), boolean chains 11, error handling 4 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition.
AttributeParser.forClass (cognitive 37) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:150— AttributeParser.forClass has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (28 pts), boolean chains 4, error handling 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CodeCoverage.generateReports (cognitive 37) src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:331— CodeCoverage.generateReports has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 16 (21 pts), error handling 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth — checks laid out side by side rather than stacked — so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level.
ResultPrinter.printSummaryLine (cognitive 32) src/TextUI/Output/Compact/ResultPrinter.php:128— ResultPrinter.printSummaryLine has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 10 (18 pts), if/else 13, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
AttributeParser.forMethod (cognitive 31) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:627— AttributeParser.forMethod has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (25 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Generator.properties (cognitive 29) src/Framework/MockObject/Generator/Generator.php:888— Generator.properties has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (27 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Help.writeWithColor (cognitive 29) src/TextUI/Help.php:109— Help.writeWithColor has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), loops 4 (13 pts) (nesting depth added 19). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
StringMatchesFormatDescription.additionalFailureDescription (cognitive 28) src/Framework/Constraint/String/StringMatchesFormatDescription.php:115— StringMatchesFormatDescription.additionalFailureDescription has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (17 pts), loops 4 (11 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SourceMapper.map (cognitive 28) src/TextUI/Configuration/SourceMapper.php:82— SourceMapper.map has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (20 pts), loops 6 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
GlobalState.exportGlobals (cognitive 27) src/Util/GlobalState.php:291— GlobalState.exportGlobals has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (14 pts), error handling 2 (6 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Loader.php (cognitive 24) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:998— Loader.php has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (18 pts), loops 5 (6 pts) (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Count.getCountOf (cognitive 21) src/Framework/Constraint/Cardinality/Count.php:70— Count.getCountOf has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (12 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), error handling 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CodeCoverage.coversTargetsFor (cognitive 21) src/Metadata/Api/CodeCoverage.php:91— CodeCoverage.coversTargetsFor has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (20 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CodeCoverage.usesTargetsFor) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
CodeCoverage.usesTargetsFor (cognitive 21) src/Metadata/Api/CodeCoverage.php:160— CodeCoverage.usesTargetsFor has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (20 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (CodeCoverage.coversTargetsFor) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths — so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared.
AttributeParser.deprecateGroupAttributesOnParentClassesOf (cognitive 21) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:1188— AttributeParser.deprecateGroupAttributesOnParentClassesOf has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (12 pts), boolean chains 5, loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ResultPrinter.printIssueList (cognitive 21) src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:506— ResultPrinter.printIssueList has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (13 pts), loops 3 (5 pts), ternaries 2, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Reader.read (cognitive 20) src/Runner/Baseline/Reader.php:37— Reader.read has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (10 pts), loops 3 (9 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ResultPrinter.print (cognitive 20) src/TextUI/Output/Default/ResultPrinter.php:94— ResultPrinter.print has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
CodeCoverage.stop (cognitive 19) src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:237— CodeCoverage.stop has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (14 pts), loops 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Help.writeWithoutColor (cognitive 19) src/TextUI/Help.php:71— Help.writeWithoutColor has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (16 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Facade.createResultPrinter (cognitive 19) src/TextUI/Output/Facade.php:230— Facade.createResultPrinter has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 15, if/else 4. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators.
InvocationHandler.invoke (cognitive 18) src/Framework/MockObject/Runtime/InvocationHandler.php:216— InvocationHandler.invoke has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), error handling 1 (2 pts), boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PartiallyOrderedParameterSets.__construct (cognitive 18) src/Framework/MockObject/Runtime/Rule/PartiallyOrderedParameterSets.php:44— PartiallyOrderedParameterSets.__construct has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
CodeCoverage.init (cognitive 18) src/Runner/CodeCoverage.php:88— CodeCoverage.init has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 15 (16 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth — many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages.
Parser.parse (cognitive 18) src/Runner/Phpt/Parser.php:107— Parser.parse has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
SummaryPrinter.print (cognitive 18) src/TextUI/Output/SummaryPrinter.php:34— SummaryPrinter.print has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (10 pts), boolean chains 4, ternaries 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
GlobalState.processIncludedFilesAsString (cognitive 18) src/Util/GlobalState.php:196— GlobalState.processIncludedFilesAsString has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
JobRunner.buildCommand (cognitive 18) src/Util/PHP/JobRunner.php:238— JobRunner.buildCommand has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (12 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
PharLoader.loadPharExtensionsInDirectory (cognitive 17) src/Runner/Extension/PharLoader.php:47— PharLoader.loadPharExtensionsInDirectory has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), error handling 2 (4 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Application.registerLogfileWriters (cognitive 17) src/TextUI/Application.php:696— Application.registerLogfileWriters has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), error handling 3 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Application.configureDeprecationTriggers (cognitive 17) src/TextUI/Application.php:1134— Application.configureDeprecationTriggers has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 2 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Application.executeCommandsThatOnlyRequireCliConfiguration (cognitive 16) src/TextUI/Application.php:501— Application.executeCommandsThatOnlyRequireCliConfiguration has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts) (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
ListGroupsCommand.execute (cognitive 16) src/TextUI/Command/Commands/ListGroupsCommand.php:40— ListGroupsCommand.execute has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (9 pts), loops 3 (4 pts), ternaries 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Loader.source (cognitive 16) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:324— Loader.source has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 4, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body.
Duplicated block (37 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Configuration.php:290— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Configuration.php:290-326 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Configuration.php:636-672 — the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach — a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none — and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice.
Duplicated block (36 lines × 3) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:863— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:863-898 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1092-1127 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1147-1182 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (31 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:980— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:980-1010 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1104-1134 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:980` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (28 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:546— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:546-573 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:800-827 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (26 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:523— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:523-548 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:634-659 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:523` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:726— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:726-748 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1401-1423 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (19 lines × 2) src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:161— src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:161-179 | src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:635-653 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Metadata/Parser/AttributeParser.php:161` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 3) src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1288— src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1288-1305 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1307-1324 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1325-1342 — all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites — resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/TextUI/Configuration/Cli/Builder.php:1288` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (17 lines × 2) src/Runner/Extension/ChildProcessExtensionBootstrapper.php:80— src/Runner/Extension/ChildProcessExtensionBootstrapper.php:80-96 | src/Runner/Extension/ExtensionBootstrapper.php:76-92 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Runner/Extension/ChildProcessExtensionBootstrapper.php:80` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (11–17 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1176— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1176-1186 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1206-1222 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 4) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBackupStaticAttributesAttribute.php:25— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBackupStaticAttributesAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameBeStrictAboutCoversAnnotationAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameCacheResultAttribute.php:25-40 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RenameForceCoversAnnotationAttribute.php:25-40 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from all 4 call sites, so a change lands once.
Duplicated block (16 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:406— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:406-421 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:423-438 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited.
Duplicated block (13 lines × 2) src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:686— src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:686-698 | src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:762-774 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Runner/ErrorHandler.php:686` it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that.
Duplicated block (8 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1255— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1255-1262 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Loader.php:1268-1275 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (25 lines × 4) src/Metadata/CoversMethod.php:35— src/Metadata/CoversMethod.php:35-59 | src/Metadata/RequiresMethod.php:35-59 | src/Metadata/TestDoxFormatter.php:35-59 | src/Metadata/UsesMethod.php:35-59 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Metadata/CoversMethod.php` and `src/Metadata/RequiresMethod.php` as WHOLE FILES: 95% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Metadata/CoversMethod.php:35` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 3) src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php:41— src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php:41-46 | src/Event/Value/Telemetry/Duration.php:45-50 | src/Event/Value/Telemetry/HRTime.php:44-49 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php` and `src/Event/Value/Telemetry/Duration.php` as WHOLE FILES: 85% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (10 lines × 2) src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php:69— src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php:69-78 | src/Event/Value/Telemetry/Duration.php:70-79 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Value/Telemetry/CpuTime.php` and `src/Event/Value/Telemetry/Duration.php` as WHOLE FILES: 85% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The `return` at the foot of the matched lines is the enclosing body's own terminal exit, not an early one: it moves with them unchanged, and each site calls the extracted unit from the position that `return` occupied — no decision has to be handed back and re-acted on.
Duplicated block (5 lines × 6) src/Framework/Constraint/Boolean/IsFalse.php:48— src/Framework/Constraint/Boolean/IsFalse.php:48-52 | src/Framework/Constraint/Boolean/IsTrue.php:48-52 | src/Framework/Constraint/Math/IsFinite.php:55-61 | src/Framework/Constraint/Math/IsInfinite.php:55-61 | src/Framework/Constraint/Math/IsNan.php:55-61 | src/Framework/Constraint/Type/IsNull.php:48-52 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Framework/Constraint/Boolean/IsFalse.php` and `src/Framework/Constraint/Boolean/IsTrue.php` as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (9 lines × 3) src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqual.php:90— src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqual.php:90-98 | src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqualCanonicalizing.php:90-98 | src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqualIgnoringCase.php:90-98 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqual.php` and `src/Framework/Constraint/Equality/IsEqualCanonicalizing.php` as WHOLE FILES: 97% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (18 lines × 2) src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php:69— src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php:69-86 | src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIsOrContains.php:74-91 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIs.php` and `src/Framework/Constraint/Exception/ExceptionMessageIsOrContains.php` as WHOLE FILES: 83% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (7 lines × 7) src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveBeStrictAboutResourceUsageDuringSmallTestsAttribute.php:25— src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveBeStrictAboutResourceUsageDuringSmallTestsAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveBeStrictAboutTodoAnnotatedTestsAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCacheResultFileAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveCacheTokensAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveNoInteractionAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveRegisterMockObjectsFromTestArgumentsRecursivelyAttribute.php:25-31 | src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveVerboseAttribute.php:25-31 — before extracting anything, compare `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveBeStrictAboutResourceUsageDuringSmallTestsAttribute.php` and `src/TextUI/Configuration/Xml/Migration/Migrations/RemoveBeStrictAboutTodoAnnotatedTestsAttribute.php` as WHOLE FILES: 87% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
Duplicated block (45 lines × 2) src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Finished.php:50— src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Finished.php:50-94 | src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Started.php:50-94 — the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach — a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them — and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 4) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:107— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:107-129 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/WarningTriggered.php:107-129 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpNoticeTriggered.php:105-127 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpWarningTriggered.php:105-127 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php` and `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/WarningTriggered.php` as WHOLE FILES: 97% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it.
Duplicated block (21–22 lines × 2) src/TextUI/Output/TestDox/ResultPrinter.php:424— src/TextUI/Output/TestDox/ResultPrinter.php:424-444 | src/TextUI/Output/TestDox/ResultPrinter.php:450-471 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names — the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately.
Duplicated block (20 lines × 2) src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:596— src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:596-615 | src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:641-660 — both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site — the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:596` it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand — widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. ★ These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, `src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:592` calls `hasComparisonFailure`, `comparisonFailure` and `src/Logging/OpenTestReporting/OtrXmlLogger.php:639` does not — after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live.
Duplicated block (23 lines × 3) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/DeprecationTriggered.php:39— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/DeprecationTriggered.php:39-64 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/NoticeTriggered.php:33-55 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/WarningTriggered.php:39-64 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/DeprecationTriggered.php` and `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/WarningTriggered.php` as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/DeprecationTriggered.php:39` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (24 lines × 3) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/ExecutionStarted.php:32— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/ExecutionStarted.php:32-55 | src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Filtered.php:31-54 | src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Loaded.php:31-54 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/ExecutionStarted.php` and `src/Event/Events/TestSuite/Filtered.php` as WHOLE FILES: 87% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/ExecutionStarted.php:32` it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows — the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members' bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run — a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift — so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member's own documentation with it.
Duplicated block (6 lines × 4) src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:55— src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php:55-60 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/WarningTriggered.php:55-60 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpNoticeTriggered.php:53-58 | src/Event/Events/TestRunner/PhpWarningTriggered.php:53-58 — before extracting anything, compare `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/NoticeTriggered.php` and `src/Event/Events/TestRunner/Issue/WarningTriggered.php` as WHOLE FILES: 97% of the shorter file's lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 2 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it — treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together — extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place.
P12 · CI test-gate honesty· Coverage collected but not gated · ×1
Coverage collected but not gated — CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum — coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool's minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository's CI files AND its coverage configuration — the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited — matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service's web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here.
Documentation: no installation or build instructions README.md— The installation section is a one-line PHAR download command with no alternative Composer install and no link to the full documentation. Add an alternative Composer install step and point readers to the referenced documentation.
Documentation: no usage examples README.md— There is no 'how to run it' example for the PHAR or Composer installation. Provide a short runnable example of how to invoke PHPUnit from the PHAR or Composer install path.
No ADRs found — No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (`docs/adr/`, `docs/decisions/`, `adr/`, `docs/rfcs/`, an `ADR0001/` folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (`docs/adr/use-postgres.md`, `docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md`); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (`0001-use-postgres.md`, `adr-012-caching.md`); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an "Architecture Decision Record" heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these — unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings — is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in `docs/adr/`.
D27 · Navigability· High interface indirection · ×1
High interface indirection — 56 % of calls go through an interface — tracing a call means resolving the implementation each hop. Prefer concrete types where there's a single implementation.
D28 · Secrets (history)· Rotate the exposed credentials · ×1
REDACTED
D34 · Knowledge Freshness· Orphaned files with no living knowledge · ×1
Orphaned files with no living knowledge — 1 of 207 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left — their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 207 of the 1062 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each — most significant first: src/Framework/Constraint/Operator/UnaryOperator.php. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway.
No ADRs — No Architecture Decision Records found — no conventional ADR directory, no numbered `NNNN-title` documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer.
No release approval gate — The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY'S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under `.github/workflows/`, `.forgejo/workflows/`, `.gitea/workflows/`, `.azuredevops/` and `.azure-pipelines/`, plus `.gitlab-ci*` and `azure-pipelines*` — with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab's `when: manual`, CircleCI's `type: approval`, an Azure `ManualValidation@` task or an `approvals:` block, a Jenkins `input` step, a `uses:` step naming an approval action, an `environment:` paired with `reviewers` / `required_reviewers` / `protection` / `wait-timer` / `deployment_branch_policy`, a draft-release step, a `workflow_dispatch` promotion, or a release-event gate. ★ What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy — all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release.
Changelog looks stale/thin — The changelog this check read carries 2 versioned entries, against a bar of 3. Counted as either an `x.y.z` string or a version-shaped section heading (`## [1.2.0]`, `## V14.x.x`, `## Updates in 8.0.x`), whichever is the larger — so a log sectioned by minor series counts its sections, not its individual patch numbers. Entries recorded somewhere this check does not read — release notes generated at tag time from a generator config it did not recognise, or a log kept outside the repository — are not counted here, and this row is about what is re-findable in the tree rather than about how often you release.
Skipped (documented): testReference tests/_files/DataProviderDependencyTest.php:24— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testIncomplete tests/_files/IncompleteTest.php:16— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testIncomplete tests/_files/StopOnErrorTestSuite.php:17— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/_files/TestIncomplete.php:16— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/end-to-end/code-coverage/_files/test-runner/tests/SkippedTest.php:18— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testIncomplete tests/end-to-end/event/_files/IncompleteTest.php:16— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testSkipped tests/end-to-end/event/_files/SkippedTest.php:16— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testTwo tests/end-to-end/execution-order/fixture/test-methods-with-skipped-and-failing/FooTest.php:23— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/end-to-end/repeat/_files/IncompleteRepetitionTest.php:20— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/end-to-end/repeat/_files/SkippedRepetitionTest.php:20— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/end-to-end/retry/_files/IncompleteAttemptTest.php:20— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testOne tests/end-to-end/retry/_files/SkippedAttemptTest.php:20— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testIncomplete tests/end-to-end/test-run-history/_files/SubscribersTest.php:16— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testSkipped tests/end-to-end/test-run-history/_files/SubscribersTest.php:21— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testIncomplete tests/end-to-end/testdox/_files/OutcomeAndIssuesTest.php:61— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: reported incomplete at run time by markTestIncomplete()
Skipped (documented): testSkipped tests/end-to-end/testdox/_files/OutcomeAndIssuesTest.php:66— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testTwo tests/end-to-end/testdox/_files/skipped-test-class/ExecutedTest.php:21— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testProducer tests/end-to-end/testdox/_files/test-that-never-started/DependencyTest.php:17— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testSucceedsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToTrue tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertDirectoryIsNotWritableTest.php:43— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testFailsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToFalse tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertDirectoryIsReadableTest.php:48— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testFailsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToFalse tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertDirectoryIsWritableTest.php:48— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testSucceedsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToTrue tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertFileIsNotReadableTest.php:42— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testSucceedsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToTrue tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertFileIsNotWritableTest.php:42— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testFailsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToFalse tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertFileIsReadableTest.php:47— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
Skipped (documented): testFailsWhenConstraintEvaluatesToFalse tests/unit/Framework/Assert/assertFileIsWritableTest.php:47— Skipped with a documented reason — a deferral, not lazy debt: skipped at run time by markTestSkipped()
No assertions (declared): testOne tests/_files/Metadata/Attribute/tests/DoesNotPerformAssertionsTest.php:19— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testOne tests/end-to-end/event/_files/ExpectedAndUnexpectedAssertionsTest.php:18— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testOne tests/end-to-end/regression/6366/Issue6366Test.php:19— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testOne tests/end-to-end/regression/6368/tests/Issue6368Test.php:19— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testExpectationThatMethodIsCalledZeroOrMoreTimesSucceedsWhenMethodIsNotCalled tests/unit/Framework/MockObject/MockObjectTest.php:72— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testExpectationThatMethodIsCalledZeroOrMoreTimesSucceedsWhenMethodIsCalledOnce tests/unit/Framework/MockObject/MockObjectTest.php:81— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testWithCanBeUsedWithoutExpectsAndIsNotVerifiedWhenTheMethodIsNotCalled tests/unit/Framework/MockObject/MockObjectTest.php:1068— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
No assertions (declared): testWillReturnSkipsTypeCheckWhenMethodNameIsConstraintMatchingMultipleMethods tests/unit/Framework/MockObject/MockObjectTest.php:1089— This test performs no assertions and its author said so, with the test framework's own declaration for exactly that (PHPUnit `#[DoesNotPerformAssertions]`, which switches off PHPUnit's "This test did not perform any assertions" warning). It is reported for visibility and is NOT counted against this dimension's score: D10 looks for tests that verify nothing unintentionally. Worth a read anyway — such a test passes as long as the code under it does not throw, so if it was meant to check something, the declaration is now hiding that it does not.
Appendix B — Reproduction & audit trail
Every external tool invocation behind a deep-scan dimension — the tool, its captured version, the exact command, how many findings it yielded, and a link to the retained raw output. To reproduce any finding: check out the same commit and run the command shown (repo-relative — never an absolute scratch path). The complete raw scanner output is retained verbatim under artifacts/raw/ (indexed in artifacts/raw/index.json); per-invocation exit codes and wall-clock durations are in sidecar.json — kept out of this table so the rendered report stays byte-identical across runs of the same commit.
trivy: not applicable — No Infrastructure-as-Code or container manifests found (Dockerfile, Docker Compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, CloudFormation, ARM, Bicep, Ansible); nothing to scan.
semgrep: not applicable — No personal data was found crossing a boundary the PII/GDPR ruleset checks — nothing written to a log or console sink, placed in a URL or query string, or persisted to browser storage. That is a clean result for the LEAK surface only: this ruleset detects personal data escaping, it does not inventory the personal data a repository holds, so it is not evidence that this repository has no personal-data surface. The personal-data map (Appendix C) and the C1-C5 compliance cards are what speak to that. semgrep could not parse 427 file(s) — `src/Event/Dispatcher/DeferringDispatcher.php`, `src/Event/Dispatcher/DirectDispatcher.php`, `src/Event/Emitter/DispatchingEmitter.php`, `src/Event/Events/Application/Finished.php`, `src/Event/Events/Application/Started.php`, … (+422 more) — so the PII/GDPR sweep did not cover the unparsed regions of them; rows reported elsewhere in those files are real.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; network egress policy is a cluster-native control that may live at the platform/firewall layer, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux confinement is a workload-level control, so there is nothing to assess here.
runtime-hardening: not applicable — No Kubernetes/orchestration workloads found in the repository manifests; runtime threat-detection and admission-control policy are cluster-level controls, so there is nothing to assess here.
Run 01a0dbb8-2c68-7ac5-ade1-e90118c2dc90 · every finding is also locatable in findings.md, and the complete scoring record (with exit codes + durations) in sidecar.json.
Issues: 2 · Warnings: 588 · Recommendations: 13 · Info: 41 — Appendix A · all findings · full markdown report.
Generated by Watchdog — deterministic code-health analysis. 26-09-2026 @ 03:17 UTC.
Downloadable artifacts
Machine-readable and reproducible from this commit + frozen rubric — drop them straight into a contract appendix, a CRA dossier, or a downstream SCA / VEX tool.