# Changelog

> **This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings — which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it — are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.**

## Score

- CAI 49 → 53 (+4.4)
- Rubric changed (rubric-2026.08.19 → rubric-2026.09.15) — scores are not directly comparable.

## Lenses

- Code Health 100 → 100 (+0.0)
- Architecture 69 → 69 (+0.0)
- Maturity 53 → 57 (+4.6)
- Readiness 36 → 41 (+4.6)
- Security 56 → 63 (+7.2)

## Resolved (10)

- Coverage not included — suite not readable by the collector
- Dependency hygiene not measured — dependency manifest found but not parsed for hygiene
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- No exposed public API
- Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1
- Test reliability not included
- The 'Commands' section shows only a one-line Ping example with String return; Voidy for no-return commands is cut mid-code. (README.md)

## New (12)

- Dependency hygiene PARTLY measured — Maven/Gradle declarations read, no dependency graph resolved
- Documentation: no architecture or design documentation (README.md)
- Documentation: no installation or build instructions (README.md)
- Documentation: no usage examples (README.md)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- High: security finding (details withheld)
- Medium: security finding (details withheld)
- Medium: security finding (details withheld)
- No dependency advisory monitoring