{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"DawnDriver.complete (cognitive 20): DawnDriver.complete has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (17 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnDriver.swift"},"region":{"startLine":13}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"968a343a1b892b8958b0108f73b94fb60cc5c53097370edada2223ffffc9d04b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: DawnAnimationType.stage: MethodTooLong \u2014 stage runs 110 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 10 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationType.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e13b310ee6bf410ad9b32bd5bad0ecdb918a7c5953eaf5c0b8fb696292c79450"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (76\u201377 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:81-157 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:73-148 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 161 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:81\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":81}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f5ffb24e6e376043f99f7062792b4c7e3d83c8576686a9deb29d96d7bee489c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (51 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:159-209 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:150-200 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 161 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:159\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b1dd7a9869b86b30794a1221f97604dd4a7dc4156e382d01dc8f8948d9d6146"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:211-227 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:202-218 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 161 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:211\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":211}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a00cf5bc0e0e835fec338250f42260b5bd18d16f2a3ce3818654d4f2789bf56f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:51-64 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:100-111 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:51\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:98\u0060 calls \u0060UIBezierPath\u0060, \u0060CAShapeLayer\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:51\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17899bbc305c768f8c6edd13820810bb914aac82e49d42b808a9d4ff28464fab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201312 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDissolve.swift:58-67 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDissolve.swift:150-161 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDissolve.swift:150\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDissolve.swift"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"492f0deb4d4c2a3cca74566366396db8436a3b6d1808fe18a01e0fceeb4ebd8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCube.swift:57-66 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationFlip.swift:65-74 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationTurn.swift:52-61 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCube.swift:57\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCube.swift"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5599b8e2c2cb9145ca123d425353141f03fa6fa784b66e527343a21285545a7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:95-102 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:171-178 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:86-93 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:162-169 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 161 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:95\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb16175b993e106c4328b49a1b8208692167194c9edcd439f3560c79bc311605"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCard.swift:44-50 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:79-86 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:71-78 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 161 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCard.swift:44\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationWechatApplet.swift:67\u0060 calls \u0060tapped\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDrawer.swift:77\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCard.swift"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93a3243f88c29eb0fc623270258c5a9c91edf6ca601dc2ad836e3bd62bba9bef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:35-42 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:82-89 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:44\u0060 calls \u0060UIBezierPath\u0060 and \u0060Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift:91\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationDiffuse.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbdaf21c1b68676bb9e4adb4e1ee450730fa476a6ccd1f05fd60445c2c657d99"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCube.swift:17-24 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationFlip.swift:16-23 | Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationTurn.swift:16-23 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnAnimationCube.swift"},"region":{"startLine":17}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d38943ebdcad945f2791a416b9bec4dbc533cd338eb07cc1f6e488a8abbe784d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:35-58 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:35-56 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample3ViewController.swift:51-72 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:41-69 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:40-68 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f31976b2a3894be10e6c54f1e7a5b4e178e2dfe01df466910c0ef067a8af1a07"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:18-33 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:18-33 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:20-39 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:19-38 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe4ddd9bfc599c9f3191bcff383d4b55bd677db12d7f57be78d30b0d0d8e49c7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 4): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:18-32 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:18-32 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:20-34 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:19-33 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:18\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:36\u0060 calls \u0060createLabel\u0060, \u0060jump4\u0060, \u0060addSubview\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:33\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":18}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74933b2f4c4d22603130817af92d9eefd8320f9db131859848cbf781129b4462"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 5): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:35-48 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:35-48 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample3ViewController.swift:51-64 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:41-54 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:40-53 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:35\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample3ViewController.swift:67\u0060 calls \u0060equalToSuperview\u0060, \u0060inset\u0060, \u0060equalTo\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:51\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5db73d6f06f045a39f1c80da306839df43099a350b8e3bc7b9fa6bc01b27a500"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201314 lines \u00D7 4): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:50-53 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:50-53 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:56-69 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:55-68 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:50\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample2ViewController.swift:53\u0060 calls \u0060equalToSuperview\u0060, \u0060equalTo\u0060, \u0060offset\u0060 and \u0060Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample4ViewController.swift:69\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78b53b9ccb621d3a54ac150aaef807cce1f3536d50ea8052fb5100344b5012af"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:107-117 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:148-158 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c2f9efebe92b09b5648ae16df398fbb5a3ed567ce804116df355e3354f6cba7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:129-138 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift:157-166 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample5ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9d124fe1b4a60939e7c19115c6f2bcd4a221c657d80b90b1b43a316563a1217"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:83-88 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift:97-102 | Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample3ViewController.swift:82-87 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/Sample1ViewController.swift"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20adebba137a369a6dab7c92c0a8f5f549b654e50776a4a4efb8b58c8ea32df3"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: SceneDelegate (LCOM4 6): SceneDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PackageDemo/PackageDemo/SceneDelegate.swift"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24cfe9da8333e287c065f7de7d1e8155d5f47cb6c22fffc35c89fbf3d81cc90e"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: AppDelegate (LCOM4 6): AppDelegate\u0027s methods fall into 6 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 6 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Example/PodDemo/DawnTransition/AppDelegate.swift"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9119c150c8558d4e3590b98e130909c54b71c7632b16a12b66f21c3ffbcb6eef"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: DawnDriver (LCOM4 5): DawnDriver\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Sources/DawnTransition/DawnDriver.swift"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2df8d2eaa1b00274afcf4b18519f1996ab2c953275a4219eaa8dda462b50c2db"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"error","message":{"text":"No automated tests: No automated tests \u2014 no test code was found in this repository. Untested code is the largest single risk to changing it safely. Start with the code you change most often: add a suite in a framework a runner can collect (XCTest or Swift Testing), and run it in CI so the gap cannot reopen."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3132564c6310e5d01a231f252a02d5d2f5a542c0a8fa29a14c89693f1e3df871"}},{"ruleId":"D9","level":"note","message":{"text":"No tests found: No test suite could be collected \u2014 no discoverable tests to count. If this repository does test, wiring the suite to a framework a runner can collect (XCTest or Swift Testing) is what makes it countable here; a pipeline step that invokes a runner is not evidence on its own, because a runner over an empty suite passes. Tests written as plain executables or shell/PowerShell harnesses are not collectible this way and are not scored here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9bf64cbb5a4ae13d6bcd01fa3bc8d2879d860c73bc67f176ee3c2cecb8adce3"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent dismissal API for Drawer animation. While all other animation types implement the standard \u0060dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver)\u0060 method to integrate with the transition driver, \u0060DawnAnimationDrawer\u0060 exposes a custom \u0060overlayDismiss\u0060 method that requires manual invocation with specific parameters (driver, direction, action), breaking the uniform interface pattern.: Replace \u0060overlayDismiss\u0060 with the standard \u0060dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver)\u0060 method. If interactive dismissal via pan is required, it should be handled via the \u0060DawnExtension.addPanGestureRecognizer\u0060 mechanism or by implementing the interactive transition protocol within the standard driver lifecycle, ensuring \u0060DawnAnimationDrawer\u0060 behaves identically to other animation types. (signatures: DawnAnimationDrawer.overlayDismiss(driver: UIViewController, panDirection: Direction, action: (() -\u003E Void)?) | DawnAnimationCard.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationCube.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationDiffuse.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationDissolve.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationFlip.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationProducer.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationSpot.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationTurn.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver) | DawnAnimationWechatApplet.dawnAnimationDismissing(DawnDriver))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b25c3f4cf3cb1248470f629a6edce413b62f564cf79ecbb847428315d4cbf5f2"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"136740cdcec51dc188ec47182ca283a6ab3d9d77dabc20b30e435f62a492f06b"},"properties":{"commitSha":"9a8c7496509024a60e3f689295967645548492ca"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 21 of 25 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 21 separate risks. Counted over 25 of the 36 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Large public API surface: 44/51 types (86%) declared in the published library are public. For a library, every public type is a stability contract \u2014 keep implementation types off the surface and expose only the intended API."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed2ba843444ae377c17142f58f714e281e4bd3f183ab100ee1fbef389875d3e6"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add CodeQL\u0027s Swift pack (Swift/Xcode) (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":2,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}