{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"]}},{"id":"D37","name":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy","shortDescription":{"text":"Vulnerability-disclosure Policy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D37","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1059","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1059"]}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixAvroCoder.fix (cyclomatic 29): FixAvroCoder.fix has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2a9c9e5e82194fecd14ce06a1f83a88774281d5364f389a587ea562f8039555"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 23): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1258}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05021c170b1ed58e353a48f1edf786f4483d530f9e1a3c08f2dcdeb815fd1fd2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 23): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2035}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48acf1e1a9185d9ea393418ee66156171168ac148e4f2409ca6c76cef4aca186"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 23): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2812}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35e85a6202cea62ce01a52fb7e101ed027191489cfc11675b2ae91e5caaa3849"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeProvider.schemaToType (cyclomatic 23): TypeProvider.schemaToType has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/TypeProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fa3e8f4362907db19e2e1871f1690230c8bbeb8c132234f569c6f88696de572"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 22): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbf9eaf24c5f01d2e1b682cd394c8b706f82b6806df7a58536b70383008d9779"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 22): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1980}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"507f46e6ed6e0da521fe4437aef9dff142a522793edd29364a36460640538d19"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 22): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2757}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c1becbb32123e29cefcf25292818cbe0f96146d020eefc27c83c8fb03fa3749"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ConverterProvider.fromAvroInternal (cyclomatic 22): ConverterProvider.fromAvroInternal has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c53e05f3e2eca8576402cb391f9697838545c02e8f6174e55e06d2b6c21c95c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 21): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcf620f3a077a255c7914bf9b97303716a7759381b04d9452a02a937c0031549"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 21): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1927}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19b5477d4cce16ca1cf51483a1bf69ec291d17b309a9acb19ec8235ad3d17342"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 21): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2704}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ae7f212a249fba07711def085430e61b7ac7e832e145585f7b1b5b430e8ab14"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SoccoPhase.typeTokens (cyclomatic 21): SoccoPhase.typeTokens has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"socco-plugin/src/main/scala/Socco.scala"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ae3226b1c7f5b343522423c9efe7829a4eb11c14638f9ba4283839042635737"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.advance (cyclomatic 21): MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.advance has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0e8c695a5ca65890b7b3ae039080a7cce1fda1c5588666e507433d4eb98709b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 20): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1099}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f06985df8dfa9372b49549697d241834c4e82785a9e1076e39437a705c5530"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 20): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1876}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06286ad13c2c65c9ae577cc922ed87f3e0c8663c5e714e703404a11c1bbc90e0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 20): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2653}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d0886e57354a4be33b67e25c0e2dab1819f605f8f62027d241ac1dc17d408e2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypeProvider.schemaToType (cyclomatic 19): TypeProvider.schemaToType has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/TypeProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c51f202dcd5173f7a010825abfc127a142b52f43ba30c2f7932fd1924120678e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 19): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1050}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8bea3957ac3e3e1e3bbaa3dff207ac1300f3c27d96e9ad1fedda548c166d6ebf"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 19): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1827}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fc40e3ce1add83ebd3815cdb2f99296b18462e9628f07333b00bfe72ea9bcb6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 19): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2604}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"893fbeefddc333172c17a2704e5f5f86a9ca3ddf700bf408be707c39ce24502d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StorageUtil.setRawType (cyclomatic 19): StorageUtil.setRawType has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/StorageUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c298b6b2f9636d04b65f5277494478bff9d372565983969d2eb7924b18596ead"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 18): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1003}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc7fc033b293f177355cbbbc62b36ba5df40802fcd5e1494960fdfa365bbcad1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 18): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1780}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b757b08e2741ec40ddb70f90d7d62af4fdc5c92c4418e7ac2d4033899c76eea3"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 18): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2557}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffb44a56bb3c5b60510a00433b8e71422676447770e5e4da6b239a0b910f7263"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 17): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":958}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b85e13c363f8a902fd63950eb374e0111381c127463a348f3a03ab908a73fcd5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 17): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1735}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f12992819522ed4ef631a2ddd83bff0ce28e85b5b87b924245c96c586fa27b9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 17): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2512}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a88aa3e2ef6acd9874a5282d2f6a148ba2dd2022e90f47c9762d0e4f89cb513"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cyclomatic 16): MultiJoin.apply has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":915}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f595dbcc2e962bfbcc6ed7c64b266736bafecb866125b8a3163c1378b353371b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cyclomatic 16): MultiJoin.left has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1692}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"205e30c1a7d0deb6bf5e24a02f42f7a2c941cf1cb091e940c742af98081bea40"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cyclomatic 16): MultiJoin.outer has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2469}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da89ff68d93171656c23de105433960f8bbbdc31928721fc44926c5168608cd0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 253): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 253 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 22 (253 pts) (nesting depth added 231). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1258}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb15fabcbf2a733c57d6fa54c13d8e06628241e67632f0326c291652f1dd075e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 253): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 253 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 22 (253 pts) (nesting depth added 231). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2035}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88ed3cabf2ebf415f577ccd3b43cd8fac4a1c191af428d1e78c0b69f43eb8914"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 253): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 253 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 22 (253 pts) (nesting depth added 231). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2812}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfe5c49d8e35b1a7b30a6ab6494ed40f794d41412bc4fd5837841b411d5897ef"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 231): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 231 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 21 (231 pts) (nesting depth added 210). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61073b8d5eceb2e1c50bdff09bb535ab756ddfc81bac0f06e03aeb436693e9f0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 231): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 231 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 21 (231 pts) (nesting depth added 210). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1980}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b802233b8d5790b67b53e463a61854c9823ba8bbdc082f162ecf000a629f97f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 231): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 231 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 21 (231 pts) (nesting depth added 210). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2757}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fe4b61f6035e5bd4bce414ba22022253eaac01091cd58bb2bec54c84d35c8bb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 210): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 210 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 20 (210 pts) (nesting depth added 190). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27fa849c9c186ecdb815d4ceef0c343fff2521aa830913b399558a28318b9c19"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 210): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 210 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 20 (210 pts) (nesting depth added 190). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1927}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ec840d5331f12d66c75afd1e37d19777c1fd4ed2f843148990ebc1e793f16cc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 210): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 210 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 20 (210 pts) (nesting depth added 190). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2704}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f038571a08de690372d9c5de3b4376de1dfa65f2b825a21d15cd8eceb4fb0fdb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 190): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 190 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 19 (190 pts) (nesting depth added 171). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1099}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75635ecaeb9b81f328b647c8ebe0a3b7d77cab596f567ca87c48536382628ef2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 190): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 190 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 19 (190 pts) (nesting depth added 171). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1876}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6e4be43d5447237bfd1258a56e4864dd1105d81d9a6687431fb3e777bec3385"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 190): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 190 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 19 (190 pts) (nesting depth added 171). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2653}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a1ab45f19e9c6ece2254a5fc9becf12092ac3f76e6581d968c57400617b267e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 171): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 171 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 18 (171 pts) (nesting depth added 153). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1050}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6e2cf72059def48207851b26881a6d117c93bc5c9652f7bbeec95f4d14ac735"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 171): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 171 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 18 (171 pts) (nesting depth added 153). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1827}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2268468e639d209667c1f9641d55eb2dde61bc1ba2635bd8c9c2a30fa67bfcb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 171): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 171 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 18 (171 pts) (nesting depth added 153). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2604}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ba888056e8330131d2948e0dbdc298d1454ca71c71efc16a73128c6c8f85931"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 153): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 153 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 17 (153 pts) (nesting depth added 136). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1003}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"259f64552881ab803c2c23384cf2aad8097295221417e4f1cb421590350285de"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 153): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 153 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 17 (153 pts) (nesting depth added 136). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1780}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f72816f7769c62120d338bb870c3d8637ab162b05542f5bcdeba6df2a50b3dd0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 153): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 153 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 17 (153 pts) (nesting depth added 136). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2557}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40cc44180dcf9afb15d3f7e0d105b8dd6c73d670633337ee7e65c675e44ee785"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 136): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 136 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 16 (136 pts) (nesting depth added 120). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":958}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61764d326fb6bb5cfc0823ed8bc5df425f6179b10c3d2750a6692f9b2df7d573"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 136): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 136 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 16 (136 pts) (nesting depth added 120). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1735}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e5fb9af8154133612c777ee938d9425623c2be123485258d725203378bdb081"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 136): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 136 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 16 (136 pts) (nesting depth added 120). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2512}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f2fe2dc3536429fd2b97fa78fe6705935d3b0e536f11f03a0b79c21feb9bd0e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 120): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 120 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 15 (120 pts) (nesting depth added 105). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":915}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"321a5fd3b313c5fe5798efc522bbddf60a62f62710ad550ab8c7ede5defd09a1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 120): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 120 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 15 (120 pts) (nesting depth added 105). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1692}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e00c26cca23ecc9c447adebcd70c454876bb6f555c523c166af3d9a81e72e71"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 120): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 120 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 15 (120 pts) (nesting depth added 105). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2469}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf18b6f12d15e31f37a0a7ced5a4dd89281bcf5b3ffe0741c506e2ce1e27daef"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 105): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 105 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 14 (105 pts) (nesting depth added 91). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":874}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"590d47f6522581689a0080b3836b26a939e35c2a0276bef93f8138e29073b1e8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 105): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 105 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 14 (105 pts) (nesting depth added 91). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1651}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4be7af95ae81070f9a82e17a8fead4fdf5fdf81ec59f22b8b148a0fe81ea0de"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 105): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 105 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 14 (105 pts) (nesting depth added 91). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2428}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"787bd666a7bcd22031a3e78d66b94af11e4ed903eeaba106eec342c6dab7773e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 91): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 13 (91 pts) (nesting depth added 78). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":835}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da11d234459dca08550e71c5314be00478c62465a928f777d47820c979d65010"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 91): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 13 (91 pts) (nesting depth added 78). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1612}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96db2f788cf838273610389e084046199cbbb445c69855a24075224776fc99c8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 91): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 13 (91 pts) (nesting depth added 78). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2389}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04cbc80a3bccf208e4ecdeaa16908b5d8ccdf6539271176fb580c816bc918f1e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 78): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 12 (78 pts) (nesting depth added 66). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":798}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e19f6f218f3ff48aa604ce76df901bf24eaf0e8e5d5e47bbc5d5d8a525530c97"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 78): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 12 (78 pts) (nesting depth added 66). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1575}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46c0c21885ac38fb8897eafb0450c893006b52bca99ce411fbb92a7b5371f434"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 78): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 78 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 12 (78 pts) (nesting depth added 66). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2352}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2426c857aae3f49461133be1a22c45419aa9c3fd502189eaa2504796104c573"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 66): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 11 (66 pts) (nesting depth added 55). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":763}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22ea673af4bba0fd08029d874334f10f708f718daf7a20f5679f37c9aca58c04"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 66): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 11 (66 pts) (nesting depth added 55). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1540}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46195bce7c9effed79708d99b78a73ab7b878649414b5da98ea9dbba0a866d00"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 66): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 11 (66 pts) (nesting depth added 55). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8257530f19c1f1500396238e07fc16517ffef907e9ceef1beec210624ae1da45"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 55): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 10 (55 pts) (nesting depth added 45). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":730}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb972cf133075d02fb974693cac918be632b9f10e967838bcce38647ac690bb4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 55): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 10 (55 pts) (nesting depth added 45). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1507}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"882ff4769845461a3840ddc4a69afccdc829d4c4fdf64ef5a2cc91fe31e42436"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 55): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 10 (55 pts) (nesting depth added 45). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2284}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa1e841aa43e620321425237e8382ad646f3452510eef3912eb769c7b04e6d57"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.advance (cognitive 51): MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.advance has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (26 pts), ternaries 2 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, error handling 1 (4 pts), loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"95117a9e0dde8341c4bc095d2c053f8e91c16b4acb01b2f5d44e960acefcff51"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 45): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (45 pts) (nesting depth added 36). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":699}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54331b61a0808a764833a54d30573aabe205fb593c26c4cb348c58380fc7d867"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 45): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (45 pts) (nesting depth added 36). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1476}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6aca4334bae4dd463a2a97003faced5984332c3dc265307e4a7e8a2a98f5761"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 45): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 9 (45 pts) (nesting depth added 36). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3d41ed8d04892bbb923a21f18aa39a046bcb357e0cf0d0abb02c155cd152c95"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 36): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 8 (36 pts) (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":670}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3bae183ae55e518e4f5816137d5a8f9c36b57e4e4cc6e2fe9c274bc5b913cc20"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 36): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 8 (36 pts) (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1447}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c17b0bba0f94305b743b7980f2b6f2674a79fe43c7ef9330f9b54053e56ae64d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 36): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 8 (36 pts) (nesting depth added 28). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1939ee7a90ad78dbfc19c1e4b2e09b0f332380159b34a08660dfeed743b58dd8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixAvroCoder.fix (cognitive 30): FixAvroCoder.fix has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 8, if/else 8 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e47946929ad111f61a765b581a4b8968a824ba20ecd01eb6ef3c4423ec71134"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 28): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":643}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"177f58fb5de35f9cda5d1ff5401d9f69e48390783d41cedc822436428b22810e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 28): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1420}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9be8aaa6d19a74e5d66b0a9c528c52097876c5c744a264ea87142196fe1d839e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 28): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc43af8ef76191df4b01edce758b095ab40d084e05846d1fca2c4c565598b0a4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ScioContext.parseArguments (cognitive 27): ScioContext.parseArguments has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (19 pts), loops 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 11). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioContext.scala"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e36c380682758f3224015a851efddb358dbbfe3c03647bdaa0acf727458f6df0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Functions.combineFn (cognitive 22): Functions.combineFn has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12 (16 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 1 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/Functions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":149}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d4786e40274e83f5b25d5ead2bdb650fb3f8f927731627b8aa0f8ba242686d9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.apply (cognitive 21): MultiJoin.apply has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.left, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":618}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b45547a3946f0c369d10c8908054bde3e02f9752a7b35408bf93bbcbc83c369"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.left (cognitive 21): MultiJoin.left has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.outer) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1395}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1560de9131c4db5b0b8e2e7c013a648dddc945509aef14f02bc3884c43afd890"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MultiJoin.outer (cognitive 21): MultiJoin.outer has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: 2 other methods here (MultiJoin.apply, MultiJoin.left) have the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written 3 times rather than 3 independent problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other 2 exactly as they are. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears all 3 is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala holds 51 of the 60 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 5202 of the 5282 points over it (98%), 144.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/MultiSourceKeyGroupReader.java at 36). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":2172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f87a80056d27bee24191cda659fced83dc9d5354e6de0e1a1a2fa14afb571386"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"StorageUtil.setRawType (cognitive 18): StorageUtil.setRawType has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 6 (12 pts), if/else 6 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/StorageUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6ac6ce11cceea6fc3371326346cd333389c916f4b038c6662cdf0ae856bfa76"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RemoteFileUtil.downloadImpl (cognitive 18): RemoteFileUtil.downloadImpl has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (13 pts), boolean chains 2, ternaries 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/java/com/spotify/scio/util/RemoteFileUtil.java"},"region":{"startLine":164}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"107da8b5d3a2f814d9578226da6fc1cf2048b178562ba3da166f300587dbea9c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SortBucketShardDoFn.processElement (cognitive 17): SortBucketShardDoFn.processElement has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (11 pts), loops 2 (3 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), error handling 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketSink.java"},"region":{"startLine":394}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b93cdd6c937b70055b7151eef7b5fcecffaa4b8794c23d20ab7cac778f9e688f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SpecificRecordDatumFactory.addLogicalTypeConversions (cognitive 16): SpecificRecordDatumFactory.addLogicalTypeConversions has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 3 (9 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts), if/else 2 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroDatumFactory.scala"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2bc979552148ac07371e7da3760df70619ae6174ed485bba47b1aab4a08826d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ParquetReadFn.processElement (cognitive 16): ParquetReadFn.processElement has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), loops 2 (4 pts), boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/read/ParquetReadFn.scala"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9c5ee1a25fc2d21dfc416d4251f10a83c668d3e69662514061464dda14535bc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: util/MultiJoin.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 2595 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 2095 over it, 5.19\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e28b6ce8c77b11f5ed40793ef6fea9f14876f88600d4cbe57e709a1a86856c1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: SCollection: TooManyMethods \u2014 123 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 93 over it, 4.10\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32600b7595ca9ac200d7d75a8b5ef03166a8a8103d0c3b5057254f5558aef9aa"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: util/SMBMultiJoin.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 1685 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 99% of them inside a single declaration: SMBMultiJoin (31-2084). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1185 over it, 3.37\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96253eb80eae0bbe63bc2b5071a63a3861f3367b6fe53bce26291b1cdbb56e0b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: MultiJoin: TooManyMethods \u2014 86 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 56 over it, 2.87\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"68130a66a7f61f29eab4b42ac8dcef20caeef5ccdac13b8c9637192272d4f11f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: SMBMultiJoin: TooManyMethods \u2014 85 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 55 over it, 2.83\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5eceb7d9cc32a11c066e66903b3dae62c31dbab2131a8be758bf1c5c1786ef04"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: PairSCollectionFunctions: TooManyMethods \u2014 69 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 39 over it, 2.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairSCollectionFunctions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2dc318d503ee59477d59d4d3216c4a1cf3c4ec83f7e54b67ad2ab2c2049d5a7e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: TableRowOps: TooManyMethods \u2014 51 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 21 over it, 1.70\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/syntax/TableRowSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe2846f68fa5cf4e2824dbadea62c27290d2f908d8642035d129db669216e06d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: bigquery/BigQueryIO.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 756 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 256 over it, 1.51\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/BigQueryIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"550e1fba4c56c3c8ce88f204c435cd3e2bceb1d8df31b3f7844e04a12612a951"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SortedBucketSink: ClassTooLong \u2014 578 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 5 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 178 over it, 1.45\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketSink.java"},"region":{"startLine":124}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b089d5ebeaa3493bd387ba3c9f8dd58badffeb39baf9622ea60905ecbdd6be7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: BucketMetadata: TooManyMethods \u2014 43 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 13 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/BucketMetadata.java"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efe993ec02bba936de254d9f08194aaeff02d6e4075a5e46ea674bdb05520eac"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: values/SCollection.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 659 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 159 over it, 1.32\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b88a91b28302d5e81b601dc615a420fe59b3986abee8a14d5d99e637abbc7af"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: ElasticsearchIO: ClassTooLong \u2014 516 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 0 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 116 over it, 1.29\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-elasticsearch/common/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/elasticsearch/ElasticsearchIO.java"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c715c2f6a3e809df67db4a0b0eac4025b9a35eba6c3a2ef66941a7410dff6838"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: smb/SortedBucketSink.java: FileTooLong \u2014 640 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 90% of them inside a single declaration: SortedBucketSink (124-894). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 140 over it, 1.28\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketSink.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c907988c06372cd7a1ec80b74ebcdebdd838b903ccbc16980f4819eec5918da4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: FixPubsubSpecializations: TooManyMethods \u2014 38 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 8 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/input-0_12/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"05cc73130774d9b082eeb84019b252e9db26938d314fd296be58cf9ec1be9e07"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: FixPubsubSpecializations: TooManyMethods \u2014 38 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 8 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/output-0_12/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala"},"region":{"startLine":8}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7960a2521811f677095077663e3738558679c3fb5867c8c6702189a57448922c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ScioContext: TooManyMethods \u2014 38 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 8 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioContext.scala"},"region":{"startLine":432}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89720cc25d38baca55645acd9991590a9c731ca736f4ec076585492ece503c85"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SortedBucketScioContext: ClassTooLong \u2014 487 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 31 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 87 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f09800d88cdefaa9931387ceefbc1dd3c769839fac8f6795ae6574790e6c9c47"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: elasticsearch/ElasticsearchIO.java: FileTooLong \u2014 569 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 91% of them inside a single declaration: ElasticsearchIO (74-808). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 69 over it, 1.14\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-elasticsearch/common/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/elasticsearch/ElasticsearchIO.java"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d603fe15e117d76447d531e2cc7cebd51a4ac425f4112d22d4158c6fc9afbf05"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: scio/ScioContext.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 562 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.12\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioContext.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb2a9bd8bdc911e3137afe20dac1691e34df92314dbdb82b36f0fbe73927341"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SortedBucketIO: ClassTooLong \u2014 434 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 3 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 34 over it, 1.09\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketIO.java"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7cc13b6b2d674dd26333b6887a90ae043850431f478ec78fa74a55b1f8f5b88e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SortedBucketTransform: ClassTooLong \u2014 418 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 2 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketTransform.java"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f114f530c75cf7e2a0043eefd2fa746b9f7289361022103380327929f92ee57"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SortedBucketSource: ClassTooLong \u2014 417 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketSource.java"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e0eb5439ffb27a24198e58db645057a2c60c6132d6d8a1d86f4c21d3a8a65fc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: SortedBucketScioContext: TooManyMethods \u2014 31 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 1 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ac42c6f403144f0e975cee2d9bc501e80555bba824d7a8ce72be6fe0a31511f8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 504 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), about 97% of them inside a single declaration: SortedBucketScioContext (40-756). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 4 over it, 1.01\u00D7 the bar. Moving the declarations that sit BESIDE it into sibling files will not shorten this file. Extract from INSIDE that declaration instead: lift each cohesive group of its body \u2014 the parts that share the same inputs and are named together \u2014 into its own unit in a sibling file, and have the original call them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afb889741393ec643fa263724319b68efa6bfe6da7d5e915a9142e64854c1b8c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (28 corresponding lines): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:145-172 | scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:169-196 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 28 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5021debae9d8bc4f49ab2a0f5f36656312311a1fe2f5b8cf1f5d434ff1775128"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (72 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:79-94 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:96-112 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:114-131 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:133-151 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:153-172 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:174-194 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:196-217 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:219-241 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:243-266 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:268-292 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:294-319 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:321-347 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:349-376 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:378-406 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:408-437 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:439-469 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:471-502 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:504-536 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:595-616 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:618-641 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:643-668 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:670-697 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:699-728 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:730-761 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:763-796 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:798-833 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:835-872 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:874-913 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:915-956 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:958-1001 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1003-1048 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1050-1097 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1099-1148 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1150-1201 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1203-1256 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1258-1313 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1372-1393 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1395-1418 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1420-1445 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1447-1474 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1476-1505 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1507-1538 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1540-1573 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1575-1610 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1612-1649 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1651-1690 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1692-1733 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1735-1778 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1780-1825 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1827-1874 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1876-1925 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1927-1978 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1980-2033 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2035-2090 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2149-2170 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2172-2195 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2197-2222 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2224-2251 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2253-2282 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2284-2315 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2317-2350 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2352-2387 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2389-2426 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2428-2467 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2469-2510 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2512-2555 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2557-2602 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2604-2651 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2653-2702 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2704-2755 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2757-2810 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2812-2867 \u2014 These 72 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 72 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 72 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df0f1f560e7619c3c4c1afbac126f41704378d255faa4790663c7c5624e345ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (32 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:207-242 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:248-285 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:291-330 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:336-377 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:383-426 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:432-477 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:483-530 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:536-585 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:591-642 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:648-701 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:707-762 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:768-825 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:831-890 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:896-957 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:963-1026 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1032-1097 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1253-1283 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1289-1321 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1327-1361 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1367-1403 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1409-1447 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1453-1493 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1499-1541 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1547-1591 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1597-1643 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1649-1697 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1703-1753 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1759-1811 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1817-1871 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1877-1933 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1939-1997 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2003-2063 \u2014 These 32 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 32 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 32 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a0799d91f69dd2b93c71cdee62a0974a5ec5dcb09e030fbf8c6c7598346fdae6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ArtisanJoin.scala:48-94 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:34-46 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:538-553 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1315-1330 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2092-2107 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ArtisanJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70984f744818a35d720b2f91fb7b2507931c03c6df61340f7218909d065ca3ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:48-61 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:555-572 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1332-1349 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2109-2126 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":48}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c147ef4f7a9b9827ee867fd77ee23296b316f79db7ac6f8f0fbc1aa1ff26b70b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:63-77 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:574-593 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1351-1370 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2128-2147 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65e14e7911ffcd4c1647cd9e1263168047a357007ad725439f29a6a4ffe0379c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:64-165 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:167-285 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:289-357 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:361-459 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cd0b0cf3ac23ebf06e53a2914a2df034f2c6c8cdf008f052e7810a60312cdf4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:87-99 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:101-113 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:115-127 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:130-142 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd7c345418ee86405d4259e0baec64cb2916df6d444467fc783d053e75ec1731"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (28 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala:109-136 | scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala:79-106 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala\u0060 and \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 51 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":109}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8a56c985b58196407027c5bd5b5fe691fcf8efa060cf7950d749c664a915ad0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/SchemaUtil.scala:89-106 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/SchemaUtil.scala:76-93 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/SchemaUtil.scala:89\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/SchemaUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"660a7e74e45fe135badfd22e6c203c55f8c1411d4923715e26a4b7fd79e22f9b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u201317 lines \u00D7 4): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:96-103 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:182-198 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:311-314 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:376-392 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:182\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d210712207995719f8e0180490e0c9e8349c50abf1788fe9a6adde0b49e06e6e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/dynamic/syntax/AvroDynamicSCollectionSyntax.scala:64-80 | scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/dynamic/syntax/AvroDynamicSCollectionSyntax.scala:113-129 | scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/dynamic/syntax/AvroDynamicSCollectionSyntax.scala:158-173 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/dynamic/syntax/AvroDynamicSCollectionSyntax.scala:64\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/dynamic/syntax/AvroDynamicSCollectionSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38ff58bc30b02381208c2e9010e6da83c8714b1ebd09e57191a17f8dce607cf9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/avro/dynamic/syntax/SCollectionSyntax.scala:63-77 | scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/types/dynamic/syntax/SCollectionSyntax.scala:51-65 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/avro/dynamic/syntax/SCollectionSyntax.scala:63\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/avro/dynamic/syntax/SCollectionSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b865f16387db7981fd6bf8c2ee75bd98bb10c7267f9250c0ed55ea46b65c4f9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/ConverterProvider.scala:69-82 | scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/ConverterProvider.scala:151-163 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/ConverterProvider.scala:69\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it and carries on into the declaration that follows \u2014 the window is the tail of one member plus the head of the next, so no call can be substituted for those exact lines, and the smallest declaration that contains all of them is the type they sit in. The repeated unit is the member each site sits in: where those members\u0027 bodies are the same, move one whole member to the shared location and have the others delegate to it; where the copies are a run of near-identical overloads or wrappers that differ only in their signatures, the repetition IS the run \u2014 a one-line delegation has no helper inside it to lift \u2014 so generate the run from the set it enumerates, or accept it and keep each member\u0027s own documentation with it. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"334769683c88f59269e57b994cb31c367effbfd4ca76a625438ff8a0d42b0c8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:153-166 | scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:177-190 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 and \u0060scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 31 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:153\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b373935e75908294e7ae5b53031d604a65ee52664e7cfe598a301b8a8d6a294"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): scio-grpc/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/grpc/SCollectionSyntax.scala:137-149 | scio-grpc/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/grpc/SCollectionSyntax.scala:194-206 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-grpc/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/grpc/SCollectionSyntax.scala:137\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-grpc/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/grpc/SCollectionSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b8635830a5848b965e6f834ac411090eaa3566a21b3e2547a0b62c09308870b2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIO.scala:191-203 | scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/types/ParquetTypeIO.scala:164-176 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIO.scala:191\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":191}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8b46b88b1e24a1e487735dcefb8d9745b2488d4d0312430f019217b8b51a2e54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:700-711 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1129-1140 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:700\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":700}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4edd35ce89a22691a0079d5828493569046c44ee2db239d5d60fb38aa301a3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala:53-64 | scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala:23-34 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala\u0060 and \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 51 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0968daacc1aa9eb430026ccbf467e9923a12f4e678aa9923abce707f5e6233cd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 19): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:111-121 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:147-156 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:185-194 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:225-234 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:267-276 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:311-320 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:357-366 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:405-414 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:455-464 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:507-516 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:561-570 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:617-626 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:675-684 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:735-744 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:797-806 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:861-870 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:927-936 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:995-1004 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1065-1074 \u2014 all 19 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:111\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:156\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:121\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26df43a7d71b17d68a00794216996dffc4ebb91f088e8a7cc2a95ea7d7572c57"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): scio-repl/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioGenericRunner.scala:39-49 | scio-repl/src/main/scala-2.13/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioGenericRunner.scala:37-47 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scio-repl/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioGenericRunner.scala\u0060 and \u0060scio-repl/src/main/scala-2.13/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioGenericRunner.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 97% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-repl/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioGenericRunner.scala"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db4333200b20e6946ea6410ede38bbfb460f67c6dc2316946e04b86d3321eaaa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala:78-88 | scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala:48-58 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala\u0060 and \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroSchemasPackage.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 51 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Each matched range is the entire body of the declaration above it, so the region is already a complete unit: move that whole declaration to the shared location and have each site call it, rather than lifting the lines out of their bodies. Any \u0060return\u0060 inside it is the body\u0027s own exit and keeps its meaning in the moved unit."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_14_0/FixAvroCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d2a9eebe0557208c3218abf4bee91ed5d60dceac510fce09caa30ce83d579c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 26): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:347-356 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:394-403 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:443-452 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:494-503 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:547-556 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:602-611 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:659-668 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:718-727 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:779-788 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:842-851 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:907-916 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:974-983 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1043-1052 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1368-1377 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1410-1419 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1454-1463 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1500-1509 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1548-1557 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1598-1607 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1650-1659 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1704-1713 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1760-1769 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1818-1827 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1878-1887 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1940-1949 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2004-2013 \u2014 all 26 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":347}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b6e3dd48d8b556230753ee2c17798cc62c1d8b4c3d8873fd6209bbcf71640d9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 16): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:215-224 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:256-265 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:299-308 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:344-353 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:391-400 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:440-449 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:491-500 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:544-553 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:599-608 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:656-665 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:715-724 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:776-785 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:839-848 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:904-913 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:971-980 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1040-1049 \u2014 all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:215\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":215}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"249c4d53680907d3b45531a71dfc0221afbccbd73e8ea5bffcd6b9fc790a8c47"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 6): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:917-926 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:984-993 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1053-1062 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1888-1897 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1950-1959 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2014-2023 \u2014 all 6 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":917}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fccbb5a050e7462a1822edf00e6c12f03a79070bd8649cf7b663f1f65ee414dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:137-146 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:674-683 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1451-1460 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2228-2237 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"763cc92525505ba5ac25c90596d0bea93804ff20817cbffb71e80ace7df9589c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/BinaryIO.scala:96-104 | scio-tensorflow/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/tensorflow/TFRecordIO.scala:231-240 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/BinaryIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c313853c62538e870c009df2693a3c1217b4dd0db83bae997f4c9d457d0e07da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/FunctionsWithWindowedValue.scala:47-56 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/FunctionsWithWindowedValue.scala:67-76 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/FunctionsWithWindowedValue.scala:47\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/FunctionsWithWindowedValue.scala"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d49eb30ec9a9eb3aee9262b85a338bec5024258d500e0a5effe77d84eb22177"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:64-73 | scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:75-84 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 and \u0060scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 31 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:64\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f959728f771c4c88658b4bb7244547cc39e694c418897dda6331833e8e25357"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:406-415 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:502-511 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:406\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":406}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d711a793c964b8bd9ace467f0eaf25304a3ed5d37337acbee2b090c231d2c078"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:637-646 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:713-722 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:637\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":637}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b108f05e3316ec263653b4e66153acdc6cec0573156c2d4d091e04d5dfb13db2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-snowflake/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/snowflake/SnowflakeIO.scala:152-161 | scio-snowflake/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/snowflake/SnowflakeIO.scala:188-197 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-snowflake/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/snowflake/SnowflakeIO.scala:152\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-snowflake/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/snowflake/SnowflakeIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7df0ad11f7ccdbe419e13ef5438a75e18a3b2ac6da6e9445a9b28a7fe57926be"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 7): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:917-925 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:984-992 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1053-1061 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1828-1836 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1888-1896 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1950-1958 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2014-2022 \u2014 all 7 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":917}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"057b60359d491842945c34b943e390b562ed274e9073096fae32d8e5f25d0750"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:118-126 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:647-655 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1424-1432 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2201-2209 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"135dcccd7e051f01c4fd8a428792597b8c672121fef73914202a6761bb159e8c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:321-329 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:406-414 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:502-510 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:321\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":321}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3fbef4a7b0d285940a88a7b039d808523e550baa4cb46e599cc007987df3fdc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/BeamCoders.scala:84-92 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/BeamCoders.scala:109-117 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/BeamCoders.scala:84\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/BeamCoders.scala"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c4416c24adc404f2c75bfd1f44039f3d12fc529ea3eccaeb9c8dc0532a69ce05"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20139 lines \u00D7 4): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:103-110 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:205-213 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:314-317 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:397-405 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:103\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"335624c9611594c3894b1ff441c4565115b6d932e9e622eab2b4d85ee391fc50"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 32): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:231-238 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:273-279 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:317-323 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:363-369 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:411-417 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:461-467 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:513-519 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:567-573 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:623-629 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:681-687 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:741-747 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:803-809 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:867-873 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:933-939 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1001-1007 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1071-1077 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1262-1269 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1299-1305 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1338-1344 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1379-1385 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1422-1428 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1467-1473 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1514-1520 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1563-1569 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1614-1620 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1667-1673 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1722-1728 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1779-1785 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1838-1844 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1899-1905 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1962-1968 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2027-2033 \u2014 all 32 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:231\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:279\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:238\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":231}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a1d4693f6d70e7a1b7bb77aeb212ac7614c368dcef5986996fad641fb52ff2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 17): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1226-1233 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1261-1267 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1298-1304 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1337-1343 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1378-1384 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1421-1427 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1466-1472 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1513-1519 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1562-1568 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1613-1619 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1666-1672 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1721-1727 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1778-1784 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1837-1843 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1898-1904 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1961-1967 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2026-2032 \u2014 all 17 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1226\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1267\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1233\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bcb7c645c0f7a8f6614609cbfdf071f28d5309f86d4e2211163a1536f25f154"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:100-107 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:622-629 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1399-1406 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2176-2183 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":100}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f96373b8d792e0a6bf95b6d67a1af7737072ffcec79e0bd0e4b2a30327d0846"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7\u20138 lines \u00D7 2): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/taps.scala:162-168 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/taps.scala:177-184 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/taps.scala:162\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/taps.scala"},"region":{"startLine":162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"828a1045406c24db035fc9ffdb64791e568410848745094fced8a8a9f86204ab"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:228-235 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:420-427 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:228\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":228}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec6998afab3c5e92ce2a59ac9ca3c7a50055d423f54ad24a2c9fc4346674430e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1087-1094 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2043-2050 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1087\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1087}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cee714b1b0a4926d11bd24f5bd39fb612a6a0c9d9ea42d361263d90d80dc0598"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 20): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:520-526 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:574-579 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:630-635 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:688-693 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:748-753 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:810-815 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:874-879 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:940-945 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1008-1013 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1078-1083 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1521-1527 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1570-1575 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1621-1626 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1674-1679 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1729-1734 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1786-1791 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1845-1850 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1906-1911 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1969-1974 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2034-2039 \u2014 all 20 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:579\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:526\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":520}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d92893e154ed3e5e5115fba8767f1cfd98bbc32307e00205bddf129826086f6c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6\u20137 lines \u00D7 8): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:880-886 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:946-951 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1014-1019 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1084-1089 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1851-1857 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1912-1917 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1975-1980 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2040-2045 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:951\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:886\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":880}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6a5bbf814d18853c0af39200599bedf8266563027e5934c3f39da3ed4f71e55"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:83-89 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:599-605 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1376-1382 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2153-2159 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a249557a5f5e03b6cb82a53006365bfeaf7bee981d534515e197fb74b54e5f9e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:525-531 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1279-1285 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2056-2062 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2833-2839 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:525\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":525}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a51668cd81c6ecbe9362b8075ad605950f8215494a61509184ddb4d41691644"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20137 lines \u00D7 5): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ArtisanJoin.scala:68-71 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:35-38 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:542-548 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1319-1325 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2096-2102 \u2014 there are 5 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 5 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:542\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:39\u0060 calls \u0060of\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ArtisanJoin.scala:71\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ArtisanJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5ecbed257835968b10b18d751f2cab79afd38ebeceb4b1e0d47793bd3093da2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:145-151 | scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:169-175 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 and \u0060scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/PairLargeHashSCollectionFunctions.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 31 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala:145\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/PairHashSCollectionFunctions.scala"},"region":{"startLine":145}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4feff94a4a5dd130bd586175c6bc1b8e566b4982585fe8f568c67f5574f99b42"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:77-83 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:124-130 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala:77\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/syntax/SortMergeBucketScioContextSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e571c6d1c9cee705efca57654c5d986bc265e73e25dc8ffe6050fe95666569f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:468-474 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1474-1480 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:468\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":468}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fbdb5f3aec77289edd0c0b5a1d34500e12ca0f97c04a66ea26e1824a79b18eb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:816-822 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1792-1798 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:816\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":816}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e22c5e47745121324615f9e7f1a3107e0ea96780be601da98f3c54b2455dff6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 72): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:83-88 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:100-105 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:118-123 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:137-142 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:157-162 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:178-183 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:200-205 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:223-228 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:247-252 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:272-277 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:298-303 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:325-330 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:353-358 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:382-387 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:412-417 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:443-448 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:475-480 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:508-513 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:599-604 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:622-627 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:647-652 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:674-679 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:703-708 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:734-739 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:767-772 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:802-807 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:839-844 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:878-883 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:919-924 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:962-967 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1007-1012 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1054-1059 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1103-1108 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1154-1159 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1207-1212 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1262-1267 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1376-1381 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1399-1404 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1424-1429 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1451-1456 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1480-1485 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1511-1516 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1544-1549 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1579-1584 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1616-1621 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1655-1660 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1696-1701 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1739-1744 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1784-1789 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1831-1836 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1880-1885 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1931-1936 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1984-1989 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2039-2044 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2153-2158 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2176-2181 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2201-2206 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2228-2233 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2257-2262 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2288-2293 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2321-2326 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2356-2361 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2393-2398 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2432-2437 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2473-2478 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2516-2521 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2561-2566 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2608-2613 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2657-2662 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2708-2713 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2761-2766 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2816-2821 \u2014 all 72 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36be91f52852bb288658df6660849aa735d33aca5d46f9f1f0132c270cd3bdee"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 48): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:206-211 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:229-234 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:253-258 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:278-283 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:304-309 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:331-336 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:359-364 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:388-393 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:418-423 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:449-454 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:481-486 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:514-519 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:773-778 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:808-813 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:845-850 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:884-889 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:925-930 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:968-973 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1013-1018 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1060-1065 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1109-1114 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1160-1165 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1213-1218 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1268-1273 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1550-1555 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1585-1590 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1622-1627 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1661-1666 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1702-1707 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1745-1750 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1790-1795 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1837-1842 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1886-1891 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1937-1942 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1990-1995 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2045-2050 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2327-2332 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2362-2367 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2399-2404 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2438-2443 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2479-2484 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2522-2527 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2567-2572 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2614-2619 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2663-2668 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2714-2719 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2767-2772 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2822-2827 \u2014 all 48 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:206\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f67c61a2852dd54d90b3b528088b4ec4c647a99d68176a2762f4f23a1c23a267"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 24): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:365-370 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:394-399 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:424-429 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:455-460 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:487-492 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:520-525 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1019-1024 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1066-1071 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1115-1120 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1166-1171 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1219-1224 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1274-1279 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1796-1801 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1843-1848 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1892-1897 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1943-1948 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1996-2001 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2051-2056 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2573-2578 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2620-2625 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2669-2674 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2720-2725 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2773-2778 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2828-2833 \u2014 all 24 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:365\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":365}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0fb582bcc608abd1605a7cffdadf1f80ed1d2605a3923569eec5018a44cd178"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:67-72 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:578-583 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1355-1360 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2132-2137 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc2998bb9916468f9a0e5aa1c43d9b6928fb66a0e37ce342fb4e91354526881e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:184-189 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:740-745 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1517-1522 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2294-2299 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:184\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":184}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60c18b9127608cbd08215a426f6faa6da85049abc39023063fa0d4a5a4ccaee7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:337-342 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:974-979 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1751-1756 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2528-2533 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:337\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b2b1de6106124861d4fd3bd3a312c6ecd2fea50011b4f2b580e95840d94463d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:89-94 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:103-108 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:117-122 | scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala:132-137 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-redis/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/redis/RedisMutator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f05e24ddb49e0fb4d5f8c6d06d3b60e5c54c03ffa3919fb9a9a121eb14ed3153"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala:173-178 | scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala:180-185 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala:173\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/rules/src/main/scala/fix/v0_12_0/FixPubsubSpecializations.scala"},"region":{"startLine":173}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a8a92de5187887bd5c54d0996ef792aee2cac1cf11e6a29355d1c16d5a7cc7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 16): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1274-1278 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1312-1316 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1352-1356 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1394-1398 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1438-1442 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1484-1488 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1532-1536 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1582-1586 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1634-1638 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1688-1692 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1744-1748 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1802-1806 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1862-1866 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1924-1928 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1988-1992 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:2054-2058 \u2014 all 16 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1274\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15b3967be5823f7bf3797f7df7c4666ebe0c9255c55c21b7ee11d0f2b04af6d5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:52-56 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:559-563 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1336-1340 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2113-2117 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c0fecf05a1738b2d3d7df11466eed45d70d9b0d6cab751817d0b7324b398a10"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:163-166 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:712-716 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1489-1493 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2266-2270 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:163\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"480600c85bebe72ccd3784fdec77c003cab800cd20e5976f34b3d42bab1213e0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:814-818 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1591-1595 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2368-2372 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:814\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":814}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d20e7e57bc16d790039c877de831c9ef423dc2d1b55bb47b5c5c66539b751809"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:852-856 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1629-1633 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2406-2410 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:852\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":852}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fece2f5452cc515fb11816ea01eabba14ecd01fb4ae48b0baa52674f83ba819a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:284-287 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:892-896 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1669-1673 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2446-2450 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:284\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":284}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"be8cd91b1772d14dd95b4daff74b076fd1c1b8734a364e6d006f589f36d1bccf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:310-313 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:934-938 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1711-1715 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2488-2492 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:310\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01b5f5771a62db0e1459efc9e554ba836aaabbc49b226f4de6e489df66561b82"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1072-1076 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1849-1853 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2626-2630 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1072\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1072}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b85689d456190a84324414a3f5696dacc6420b86111c93e41aabe3fa988c8d7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1122-1126 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1899-1903 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2676-2680 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1122\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ee7971d105286326641d98d2e6623d03be2f39b25a36186339aa67618d12f60"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:461-464 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1174-1178 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1951-1955 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2728-2732 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:461\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":461}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0a849dc236b56f2444d701ea4835decd9c86328d6a0673a9d3fdcb432774527"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (4\u20135 lines \u00D7 4): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:493-496 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1228-1232 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2005-2009 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2782-2786 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:493\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":493}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"267dc38604d1fa5521f85c97979d31284c9bc27416f7a47b22b682804e92a23e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:175-179 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:369-373 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala:175\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/ConverterProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"278a0f937bdc6d3f0b857f0d65822ad1e629272c5f7f0f6663c793bb99903225"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:900-904 | scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:1926-1930 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala:900\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/smb/util/SMBMultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":900}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7cb42160cf72ab852aea48b58f56736e682b0a56fc4e5cf6f6e35dcdc3b2fbb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (26 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/input-0_8/src/main/scala/fix/v0_8_0/FixJoinNames.scala:29-54 | scalafix/output-0_8/src/main/scala/fix/v0_8_0/FixJoinNames.scala:26-51 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/input-0_8/src/main/scala/fix/v0_8_0/FixJoinNames.scala"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0af7d05ac44a302f4ede4753d1c3a8817db4d5ad3d830c801952ff7ab7a2adde"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): scalafix/input-0_7/src/main/scala/fix/v0_7_0/FixAvroIO.scala:11-23 | scalafix/output-0_7/src/main/scala/fix/v0_7_0/FixAvroIO.scala:11-23 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scalafix/input-0_7/src/main/scala/fix/v0_7_0/FixAvroIO.scala:11\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scalafix/input-0_7/src/main/scala/fix/v0_7_0/FixAvroIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2d8f80a2cd5de92e07960ab91bf0b823626b54a1de52a34be61e0c3e4f157b3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/MacroUtil.scala:36-41 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/MacroUtil.scala:39-44 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/MacroUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcb49304d1606cd0ce12b5d3815424a8a60dd75a3fd565e0bad3c89f85216ca4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/TypeProvider.scala:456-462 | scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/TypeProvider.scala:557-563 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/TypeProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":456}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e20cd63eff004ceb7f96948f38b6223ac641f861e5c28bcaed5146172ccde745"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/JavaCollectionWrappers.scala:39-43 | scio-core/src/main/scala-2.13/com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/JavaCollectionWrappers.scala:39-43 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/JavaCollectionWrappers.scala\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala-2.13/com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/JavaCollectionWrappers.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 85% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. The two sit in different directories, so one cannot simply be deleted in favour of the other while both are reached separately: hoist the shared part into a location both already depend on and have each file call it, and retire whichever file turns out to have no caller of its own left. Extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala-2.12/com/spotify/scio/coders/instances/JavaCollectionWrappers.scala"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b9bfbab3017f1d2f013fcae0074e75971fdd02ad23c622022c41bd35104ce6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIO.scala:55-63 | scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/types/ParquetTypeIO.scala:56-64 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1baf936622ef2a132baa1edc9534e76d80fe7501e10a74d07597cd1537eaa261"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 18): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:609-613 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:634-638 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:661-665 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:690-694 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:721-725 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:754-758 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:789-793 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:826-830 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:865-869 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:906-910 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:949-953 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:994-998 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1041-1045 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1090-1094 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1141-1145 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1194-1198 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1249-1253 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1306-1310 \u2014 all 18 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:633\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:608\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":609}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd5960969996f7bcd3357a19a7f25bce382e39fe4f2d8fb5f34fe39f85953d17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 13): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:749-753 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:784-788 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:821-825 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:860-864 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:901-905 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:944-948 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:989-993 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1036-1040 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1085-1089 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1136-1140 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1189-1193 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1244-1248 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1301-1305 \u2014 all 13 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:783\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:748\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":749}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c118e1c1c39f87fd35f210615dbd3b56743a32d282b6600b4ea72b9f3129256"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 8): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:939-943 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:984-988 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1031-1035 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1080-1084 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1131-1135 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1184-1188 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1239-1243 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1296-1300 \u2014 all 8 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:983\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:938\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":939}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07421f88703a35e8bd7d20ab163573be7074549820de92103f622f45f7bf7037"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1556-1562 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2333-2339 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1556\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1556}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0aa1d9e0351ae80988216d2245cf055e11e117fd23f052c50fffdb96e70b7ad1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1802-1808 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:2579-2585 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1802\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1802}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"255f9c4d2b594d8224e5c805ca83a87eca84f56d947349e258142f09c1088e73"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1179-1183 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1234-1238 | scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1291-1295 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1233\u0060 calls \u0060getAll\u0060 and \u0060scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala:1178\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/MultiJoin.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44bc81fd1226e1659efa62344ec4950324685ef129febfc200f1f7fbea4bcdd5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala:35-74 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/CombinePerKeyExamples.scala:35-72 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/DistinctByKeyExample.scala:34-67 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/MaxPerKeyExamples.scala:34-62 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/StorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:35-84 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"725ec3a26af4d6ab0d547e87b335a1ee31b4a905bc5fa1fab242b801870d87b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/CombinePerKeyExamples.scala:37-57 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/DistinctByKeyExample.scala:36-56 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/CombinePerKeyExamples.scala"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46767856742d048615271c1fef15a6b25ff8707d98229e5b657e4ec81aefe297"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedStorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:52-72 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/TypedStorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:60-80 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedStorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:52\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedStorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ca2c3262d333471a032bd7cc6c5c876e8dce49f98a1f08bca0a17c301be7f4c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedBigQueryTornadoes.scala:47-65 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/TypedBigQueryTornadoes.scala:55-73 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedBigQueryTornadoes.scala:47\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTypedBigQueryTornadoes.scala"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2613195693590ebccfaa953e11c7f95c24ef53d699705e09e63c6908c94c0d98"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 3): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala:37-48 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/MaxPerKeyExamples.scala:36-47 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/StorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:37-48 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala"},"region":{"startLine":37}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b90532c327154c014f037389cc85827c0add34e20689159f4956863807ac28"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/JoinExamples.scala:60-70 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/JoinExamples.scala:124-134 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/JoinExamples.scala:152-163 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/JoinExamples.scala"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44e04cfe178c7d506a1b2d576ff3af8aa4eb1f75972e05a1256870c64e9934bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficMaxLaneFlow.scala:70-80 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficRoutes.scala:57-67 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficMaxLaneFlow.scala:70\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficMaxLaneFlow.scala:67\u0060 calls \u0060setup\u0060 and \u0060scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficRoutes.scala:54\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TrafficMaxLaneFlow.scala"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2fa06fd856856b3d027c34ce1341bd095a24859472e9f2e156ff6bf1f696ec7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/game/GameStats.scala:58-67 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/game/LeaderBoard.scala:61-70 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/game/GameStats.scala"},"region":{"startLine":58}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ac5d116441de2ba7cad00bf22f3251ac5337c74555f06a320624daf391435ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala:40-45 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/CombinePerKeyExamples.scala:42-47 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/DistinctByKeyExample.scala:41-46 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/MaxPerKeyExamples.scala:39-44 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/StorageBigQueryTornadoes.scala:40-45 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 5 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/cookbook/BigQueryTornadoes.scala"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aaf4ca63b5ef396b0850ea79798b4fe950eed258478fa0033790da8a96969f54"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/WordCount.scala:77-81 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/WordCountScioIO.scala:79-83 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/WordCount.scala"},"region":{"startLine":77}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60bfe800b77cb74fde48040a2ca75e425344933d345ad6ffd11bd0da90086608"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyAvroExample.scala:46-50 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyDatastoreExample.scala:48-52 | scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyTensorFlowExample.scala:53-57 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/extra/MagnolifyAvroExample.scala"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c783587b56d67b862b6de7337f73549e3ee0f8fadd457d9f87b19f6aeefd6bd6"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: ScioResult (LCOM4 5): ScioResult\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioResult.scala"},"region":{"startLine":44}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd019f4ec662b741ca5986f7d1082628d9667310898f09d1e2f3a1e958e3a464"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: SCollectionWithFanout (LCOM4 4): SCollectionWithFanout\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollectionWithFanout.scala"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"325a7382223fc79a3a29ffc92ec4f16749b45ab4d20183d11182fb46f9544733"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 5 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/avro/ParquetAvroIO.scala, scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/ParquetAvroFileOperations.java, scio-parquet/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/types/ParquetTypeIO.scala, scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/Taps.scala, scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/SchemaProvider.scala. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db48584827770d0f06d45d552991c6e2dfa1ba33140eb5cd9846b53d2f635cfb"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #2: If anonymized user #2 becomes unavailable, 3 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigtable/syntax/ScioContextSyntax.scala, scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroDatumFactory.scala, scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/SysProps.scala. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f087f3a39316f1c97999b2b64f40dc5216a7b40c643c8c630bff8287cc372e7e"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Further sole-owners (lower concentration): 1 other contributor(s) are each the sole owner of a small amount of code below the off-boarding threshold \u2014 folded into the bus-factor score and metrics (9 single-owned of 386 analysed files in total, counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 386 of the 771 production source files in this repository met that bar). They are anonymized user #3 (1 file(s)) \u2014 spread or document their files in the same way, at lower priority than the named off-boarding risks above."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6eac528f2429e724e1a97ed868f79eefbcf1888dab4af9a9e673429369bb5b2f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // Todo remove special casing when fixed \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"integration/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/TypedBigQueryIT.scala"},"region":{"startLine":281}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa8d25b1afa9c63ab7bd5e5346bd58d283f58f7f026db769eecd847fa57eae82"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // Todo remove assertThrows after fixing in Beam \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"integration/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/TypedBigQueryIT.scala"},"region":{"startLine":340}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f1d11ba6951803dd2267348313452448713aa026917b18dca86b08dc5bdc366"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: figure out why inet/InetAddress doesn\u0027t work \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"integration/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/cassandra/CassandraIT.scala"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f910d8d123489446e1dff11e98574dd51215857584bb486f20a8fbf878e91951"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: // XXX: Copied from BigQueryClient \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"integration/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/util/ItUtils.scala"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08f016cfeefb0d623af39510db4eb87117e2707caaebce0b2eac1f2a4bdb9943"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO move this to companion object \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroDatumFactory.scala"},"region":{"startLine":78}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec882c9b5994f39213a8a3ae057713dea213c16d5772d693bf4368ff43387a88"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: broken because of a bug upstream https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6742"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/schemas/instances/AvroInstances.scala"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f6b82a9efd5a443ad3bc7d61596526490631a58bd6ad6e1f7edfc06f3cd854f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: add this as key/value settings with default etc \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/TypeProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1240b10077fe1b0d8ac419c29ba2bf7f3eebff0fad8f3c428a436175d232eb3a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: add this as key/value settings with default etc \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/TypeProvider.scala"},"region":{"startLine":517}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2b847f310ccc8f26fa29f18de298fbbab8bce9332f5785d08f7d06056c428ae"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: // XXX: similar to GenericAvroSerializer \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/avro/AvroCoders.scala"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e296446a1b5f402c6c157a0bfea004736d1fcf4c374091f49efcfed9b46fe0b0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9560dcf1db061f934b7c40af28dca08b2c94170def021a6d494c2a8436b7b4ad"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":82}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65f2b810d6c9e2698ad5a3e44f1f6844c750fd6aeee46795b6b87e180b6fbb1f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/AvroIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfe16760d3f472e8e54b75aa5d5ea6678cce12086b393d1b70fd27fd7d0b9daf"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/ScioIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":183}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c83007f4676d08e93c55a6e1eeae2d325fa948efe0b57d68599ae76214cf0325"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/ScioIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d1975e615d737d5dda5c27f1b34b2c6118d8fb02b2a6a5810da916bdc0d9b0cd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/avro/ParquetAvroIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db44c114d1e34482c491d84df0191a86f773dbf35b277ceb30f6c17beeb82bda"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/tensorflow/ParquetExampleIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":159}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"35b579f14119f6cf6c5d9eae8a8320583dfbaddbbbb407db8da94636e3236c71"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-parquet/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/parquet/types/ParquetTypeIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":47}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"725149634f7da97b77fd0b2550761561814cfd9fe1d65bbc515e5117762bc452"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO there is an exception with auto-sharding that fails for unbounded streams due to a GBK so numShards must be specified \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-tensorflow/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/tensorflow/TFExampleIOTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e2f8fafd353652dd9443f17e8e9a1576a5763a9b4c9e28c858418698ddeb287"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: can\u0027t derive Eq for this \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-avro/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/avro/types/ConverterProviderSpec.scala"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cac4115741560032cd3c543e5cb2d248923dee6ab1461219e70d7eb5e618c845"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: this is ugly, is there a better way? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioContext.scala"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c30838eadd9b297c8386d1cfd14caf758d5d953100558bc97f502701dd7255a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // Todo replace with getReadChannelOptions when GoogleCloudDataproc/hadoop-connectors#1294 is released"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/ScioContext.scala"},"region":{"startLine":471}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53ac1cae51885869936626deb9d22311ab41497eba84541592c2f4d53d2564df"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: handle ElementByteSizeObservableIterable[_, _] \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/KryoAtomicCoder.scala"},"region":{"startLine":187}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8df8c4404278f61b62bc7cff651f496325839a6486f3d358cded820d0705536f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: add possibility to fill this for testing \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/io/ScioIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f31099105660ae511eb16fb0bf485855547f1ee16d2dc88839550022a35631ce"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: // XXX: scalac can\u0027t unify schema.Repr with s.Repr \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/schemas/SchemaMaterializer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b47ac13fc9d9d393e3ffef34f6329a50a11c02eb23e98dee00089a48526e8585"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XxxComment: // XXX: scalac can\u0027t unify schema.Repr with s.Repr \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/schemas/SchemaMaterializer.scala"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e1677b6e1044e98c94208c4735bf6f3ce4672d09004e8a4e2ab865a30a57d47d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: polymorphism ? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/schemas/Schema.scala"},"region":{"startLine":189}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b234ca8cff459007ca537c701696c6d4e2dbec30223bcb853ccc741262ab851"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: WrappedArray ? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/schemas/instances/ScalaInstances.scala"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f2b5bde3ac9d4b28dbbc03417e148b78a8c4d06acf508c9fe44674e3beae67f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: cover Flink, Spark, etc. in local mode \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/ScioUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f77bd781955fedd6faf1c9be3e3e584a149858d50a9cb66a07c5994f8eb90591"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: is it necessary to setSeed for each instance like Spark does? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/random/RandomSampler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"922d178bc842f371021ab04a0cce03a2d7cf4bfd22d15260101fde7c44725cbe"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: is it necessary to setSeed for each instance like Spark does? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/random/RandomSampler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16f7a84d2812c2fc164e989dcb3fa86f25b1b2210f70f9c84ba881d5bd17d448"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: is it necessary to setSeed for each instance like Spark does? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/random/RandomSampler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66d8a76588fa0ef46318e836c9bc52de0763827370a0f80c1265374c80c15e8c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: is it necessary to setSeed for each instance like Spark does? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/util/random/RandomSampler.scala"},"region":{"startLine":213}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c443e13da020843a9a3fc2e6b6a42cd3c6b55438da39e1af3108edbb504d734"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO move to implicit \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":927}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba58b5d2bbd304f070f057622b0813bbb8665568d29882d5f11c678a6a0c5d98"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO move to implicit \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":931}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c87440dbe6fd12cc375ca93d97c215a13fd3dede4a10726660052a9e6a73973"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO move to implicit \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":935}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9becb99c221b51c5586d2d3e511f462d505db0d416189e23a57a4ec1e14bd381"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO move to implicit \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/values/SCollection.scala"},"region":{"startLine":952}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2f737e3b0416c4e1e3e34a324d3c42f50e878017fb1f80a0a80501a24c4bf16"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: TableRowJsonCoder cannot be tested in scio-test because of circular dependency on scio-google-cloud-platform \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/coders/CoderTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":489}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e48e6b42041520145df34cfec445ca83e8a56b80fa8faad4869cd3ae96de808"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: this test is flaky because teardown is called asynchronously \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/transforms/PipeDoFnTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6edea7fb31cb76aa36ebf759fc1bf18d914b6eeb398e3b83bf117d4bae116b11"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO currently not supported with different schemas for example GCS to local, else could use \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/examples/subprocess/utils/FileUtils.java"},"region":{"startLine":69}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cbe01300c3608c385029f4c21a53dade85c1b22006a7b598b0f0aaf984bc9b7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: add splittable DoFn approach once available \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-examples/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/examples/complete/TfIdf.scala"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb0f18c8a93628206a1d42b7c7ffd1b958f8e6af0fc7fdba36b596fc82a59c2a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // See the thread-safety TODO and mutable cache implementation in Chill 0.10.0: \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/SparkeyIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":54}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3ffa244dfc71dcfa1ea958b263bdfa5b2c195d0fca95eb486c4d3fb0d341f99"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO WriteFiles inserts a reshuffle here for unclear reasons \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-extra/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/extra/sparkey/SparkeyIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":185}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7da95a9d53c83e90307d0b8f1606ef7013b34e0e388e625fbc062b2e943b0cd2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO this is inefficient. Migrate to TableRow API ? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/taps.scala"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"39b8edaa46e0d0d14dc613f80aad1819fc7af0de3834fa7396d3fce0a0a8c6af"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: schema.getLogicalType == null in this case, BigQuery service side bug? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/StorageUtil.scala"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5fb4e90814777a827f3a9844f3331611500720475d0d54ad0da648edd94e82f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: support labels Inheritance like in bqReadQuery \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/BigQueryIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c656d40f2411e7b2d10cfdc360e60a22e7a0bfbe06aa9dc039396ad46802f538"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // Todo remove once https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/34038 is fixed"},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/syntax/SCollectionSyntax.scala"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7a641014e070a32c4b3a428d927d84c4d8f52cdf0ae432fff9f449b1e8b09aa"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: mock BigQueryClient for fromTable and fromQuery \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-google-cloud-platform/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/bigquery/types/TypeProviderTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04713e0703735554baf13dc7ad7125997b93d8ff369421fb7276648f655c2ff6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: pass BQ settings \u002B non distributed settings \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-repl/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/repl/ScioILoop.scala"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"886f4f970737871765a9626871fba168dc276599bc94feb3dd1344c665e3aeb9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO is there some better way to avoid this? it\u0027s either shuffle or serde here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/SortedBucketSink.java"},"region":{"startLine":405}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a846ea93806327f51f2d4a5bce511f1f0569b229c1a76b873abd5f5d4e6d1b7a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: what about \u0060Option[T]\u0060 \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/ParquetBucketMetadata.java"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4aa2e4b12f89a142c8a7509100f74c76108e214bb5c58cd41abfbecbcfa9b91c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: current limitation: must exhaust Iterator\u003CValueT\u003E before starting the next key group \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-smb/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/smb/KeyGroupIterator.java"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd9ca63d719f354919a1f9160b8e54f60b520e12593bc8d101c2443426f3a848"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO Create a tap \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-snowflake/src/main/scala/com/spotify/scio/snowflake/SnowflakeIO.scala"},"region":{"startLine":179}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b271b2335a4075b98921c710fbe3c735385e8b9dac749f85219e090cb9c05b42"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME why! make! things! private? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-tensorflow/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/TFRecordFileBasedSink.java"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c155129e5c4740afcbf38a027fb401e159c33e1bff4309d18869f6461a517cd0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: these will fail if TR in predicate is pulled in via closure, not sure if fixable \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-test/core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/SCollectionMatchersTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":336}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04b7f4e418d739384e2882142295922374e428d789dba01598893d754c3f41ef"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: these will fail if TR in predicate is pulled in via closure, not sure if fixable \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-test/core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/SCollectionMatchersTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":389}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d70d120b81c32d14aabd5be07751d386d55af3e6d84726955b5c3a215884a1d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: these will fail if TR in predicate is pulled in via closure, not sure if fixable \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-test/core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/SCollectionMatchersTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":443}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc954d121955af7af1d4a754f0f67233ceec82c989108db0c124bf6ce8808825"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FixmeComment: // FIXME: these will fail if TR in predicate is pulled in via closure, not sure if fixable \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-test/core/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/SCollectionMatchersTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":518}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b70eea3e69fd07190382d439e9abbe5af9b40f5e04031584d1496d03c4bf2719"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // Todo eventually replace with MagnolifyParquetProperties \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"scio-test/parquet/src/test/scala/com/spotify/scio/testing/parquet/ParquetTestUtilsTest.scala"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72e6de5c339b47fff15697cd9526002ab9f2451b214f2778d3b1da59bec8f26c"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5b8f11381d61a58459ffc7c595fd52d09c03c711894a63a9578043d2338412b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28847bfb68128ad6c95eb6a19a3df3a0787d1bdadcf090baba24802b8a233364"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"703b990f6d9a60db46de372b4bc3713bc769740b61be7dfed2b23b523664ac12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"729e5bc298ad01143d3c74eded9450e85148cb8c1a021945ef116207704fc7f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04cc6ef8b2713c5ae671a21c5adfc62ed3d32eec231bd27236ea49e066082d50"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baa151beff35ac46ee2536907cc918a207da07c42b004fec4c9aab8d58a6df6d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77e2e71a4329e551cbe8be7023c7191820e375353d80fbebb52a3572f6943665"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28184dccd9870d18921766b3e1f95e42fb1c13ab7d0b3cadcb96c9faf4f5268e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d038141b97bfb24a1d4c2d9b770a600ebb6b2faab28281752aecce4b10e19762"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc17439367157c6f6ff8590f4dfe29bc3a0ce4e328d99df310f8a49a2877af10"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc26593caf509b487cb3dff9d1a587737a02c72fc5e13e59c1a151f7d6412ad4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36277bee0c8295bb8eb3bc0beb5fb978eebe1486d553ab0cd28084b35ebb8343"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"417c80d37e40c8c101c97e32ba9af1a95439f85918a11b7f2f630d08f638a53d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a618793b2757574d28796da0abb139eb5b5fe27e487d02dc63636e793f0a8158"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a5c7a5c8262c14d7ceade84922b20594a601737a67ff26aa6d53e142ee6f117"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e8a627e7020ac8119c8ec6c60ce9a9f6a161d947c9dd66552a2bad9e055ffb9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f57d1d312afdbea5e586f5c4277469ac5784f32d5ade2a108c78d246b6a0be52"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e8d4db4de3eb2579e68bf9c1a5bad4b5e1199284ea31c7802136457a878522c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc3b539f953f180f304780b633bbb65e6d2911ce57503f2f0e4a05dfd504060"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7c14eeb322dbc9864bb67d269c811acd8c6c7d07f97073f14914344d5aca508"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c621f5e3c28afd9d43ea749a9222f14813c396ce51ae0051c7b532c36bd1be6c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9310ff176838195d3785805cb048449f87ccc19da72f1ac0649aa68697727707"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8272671f38d5039784c4c019aa85a647d4cf04430316f898373905b8429e8a2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40652d854c8cb92e4c0834fbf63cd0f58d62adac2a1d84ac4bb3b2ab9a3ee258"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28fb95c74cf7e51a3f6e58d6d5d9aaba698bdc10ef21fbd45c72dc90736c26c6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83d5b44279031bec740690ab44ee5b88748a6184b367a5755d42129a05f90485"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aff3f09c70375ae301d2f3e5d7b851c35db1a85fffcfe6e2f77d8979ba9b7431"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5ff6c36cc77c52281fa395ac6b9e1e18754b22fb93caffb8d30a7715d1e22e8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1f50d653393624b43cbe6a43cb43c8d4f9de3124c6692cb5a2fa6ad23a2fe57"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf6e654aae86dc886c5a2e651d1be07a1252f28560ba57c82c6b15ac3d1f9c30"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b80ae8da55fd46c5b8bde53ebdf54033fbffe093a4e7eb292aeafbf0923f5ea3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1375048b9ca8ef192c23faf83af425d2e99a11eb2f6e7951f3d837d8c63c990e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcc1f2c1d462cf8556b1a75f60437f3d6c71d8017e92bdabb89bfe62f4ec4576"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dba947422e5342f3ec1c8c79cd0d382f193ca875a3cf3b831fb3cd646cf4c808"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b95350252082326d49e96c014655a993388f9e0b105cfc88bd4f26fc549c5ab9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ba138b206425848388ff293a7c8f2da15273939023c73d5a0ae732a4d421510"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6adae5a33a07a3b308c4c5f62460ed2a718435ed022f84cf25e548fc18904f4d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7205317fc4307744fd9abdaec5a93c99047e2b3dc6e771c88b80b57760d42c9f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6211308496947d3573fc592c0286a7628e663ab59070c554d9ee60b83db613ad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23ddd22690888f6671a77adc845d23197e87c49c09c33d3d0e006067ed72ab03"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b7bc69f75e0747bbfe9563ea927df78dbb239868e5e1f5907778f9dffd053de"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efce61f66e39d36a211f88bd6c5bec1339fd388aeb0b3ade4d8fa0ad1687eeef"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bfa7a65ed374180a04e227336bba362c3a39d566ec86c540f63d23605a1366b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a046be6e07d1aceb0d185469c004b390acadf095ce71ec477548bcd22e326389"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"069640fd5b874c333b0be87b16d7bb9a8d701de251e17034730516bfa199a39d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef5bb9f8ab99f5b927de5e7dd768a358dab5a0c19e64284446b1200f0681c085"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0881c0efffed3555a73ccf33515d3fed86c44d55c2c4dade110f97eeb47877b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c7f7744690fa16b0f0c60acc633d2e24adb081b09cbab13c6392b6708a25245"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f6d3dfaf427159209d86f31eea5ec41dd7c076eaa4d2656a49f43c94a753c45"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f64bf335ad02dc1c8c00be30c50fe9cd56c46588450a5c7000f8c762a65ab322"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d9592bc286eef6d5f5eac1e7bd5e2c9b2b241319d21d8e0033095d7f7729d83"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7cfe6e4ffa8cd0bd1921bbec91b42ea82300f1b9d1ddaf83351ea81b8211e12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c5fd57f3c3bdf97acd3677960b232f232b96821e558bfd0569f7056066c4995"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0bc20140a088280cb292831ab89bf1451a4169248dc884281eed1c037bd4e0a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99b6710f6613f3ab430757a6d94e92b1da96eb1a5f08219a242fc985f307e586"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"31ce17e9039fe932b6226b1fd1bfa3b6e018610c61e6dbb845633edead6a2b7c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d6296e838a14405fa9b2b45a67a1f792c110ed3aa2cb9d117c23f386b450904"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86aa51b78dccf08375d5b4354b11cccd1a64fdbef3a7b819fd771068335d1f98"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb25cda6c3935364558b5af7022b98c565d410ef66ce596105355bd69a0f7e6f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d711337268cbe12045a50b8ee7a1bf63a711cccf132fe146922710ebdea8b52"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1391bffb8e6ad22691fcc7d98c203715d951001a6ee996122f70ca6eb13f4aa1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4dd83bae10bb03e6719f81763f3b0ab23e0e86aaa849a83e891068fe1a85681d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0aeb2335a97e8096434bb5398ca226a9792ca2c50179a44676e64caf941f407f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f022d3537872358acfd0272ec3a2a8fb6792d311a0e25c1e2d84518e9598c1ea"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3da13ba158ecdbf980a28562327ba9509e1aeec64ee3b546e379d656c19e0a1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa54042866b5a0cfc91b1e020e1d990787795474392ddcff628f419b747a31ce"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c8953dd142e2626c7de4bc8b8e062d6f4c4c95acd5440d43b400cde225146ae5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a4373bd232fe789a0c222a542e032c912119b5fadd7622ca379fc42004e41b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10d673274c5ccb36029058235f88c349a44fcbc9f44125d8452f425855b89e97"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe274ba5adebde25ca0b3db842e44cbb1aaeb7cfecfbb7215cd452596ba1f4c2"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"README may be stale: 20 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched \u2014 it may no longer reflect the system."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e973e7a8d5d866995cbf78b120250fe7f132bf928812d48ca62e69aba11b9910"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P12","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage collected but not gated: CI collects a coverage report but no step enforces a minimum \u2014 coverage could halve and CI stays green. Add a step that fails the build when coverage drops below a floor (your coverage tool\u0027s minimum-threshold flag, or a coverage-gate action) so the number guards something. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: this repository\u0027s CI files AND its coverage configuration \u2014 the well-known coverage and test-runner config files, read at the repository root and inside workspace package directories two levels down, so a floor declared beside the tests rather than in the pipeline is credited \u2014 matched against the threshold settings this check knows by name. A floor set in your coverage service\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or under a setting whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7f63c06044cf998d9a0698692df30d8873e29bc9b0c98ee829255017c1193d33"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1059","guid":"a2381a08-60f6-9554-a8b8-f3018cfaaca5","name":"Insufficient Technical Documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Technical Documentation"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1059.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"CWE-353","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-353"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"CWE-522","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-522"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"CWE-829","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-829"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":73,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}