{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D11","name":"Test Reliability","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Reliability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D11"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D20","name":"ADR Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"ADR Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D20"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D39","name":"IL Efficiency","shortDescription":{"text":"IL Efficiency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D39"},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AC1","name":"Text alternatives","shortDescription":{"text":"Text alternatives"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC1"},{"id":"AC2","name":"Forms \u0026 labels","shortDescription":{"text":"Forms \u0026 labels"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC2"},{"id":"AC3","name":"Page structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Page structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC3"},{"id":"AC5","name":"ARIA correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"ARIA correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC5"},{"id":"AC6","name":"Visual \u0026 motion safety","shortDescription":{"text":"Visual \u0026 motion safety"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC6"},{"id":"AC7","name":"A11y enforcement","shortDescription":{"text":"A11y enforcement"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AC7"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX8","name":"Test isolation","shortDescription":{"text":"Test isolation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX8"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"SC1","name":"Supply-chain hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/SC1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderToolCall (cyclomatic 64): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderToolCall has cyclomatic complexity 64 (threshold 15). Of this number, 59 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ef71c0f0a5bdd0e8d5b3ae95eddf901d993ac271512aa055c6bfed40e84a0d82"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderEntry (cyclomatic 46): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderEntry has cyclomatic complexity 46 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3550}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5f67482169c9f50b3ff9a0a1a0b7d382be21d75cf16864efb20d7311a4dc9e2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.BuildFsxScript (cyclomatic 32): Program.BuildFsxScript has cyclomatic complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a3c7c356e565035a4bacf264d4c7eac9c99b57b6eb462f151e85a3c3a6e3664"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.ReadScriptContents (cyclomatic 30): Program.ReadScriptContents has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd2947ae78399c3a98c363b68c64e9b146a87fcd92feefeeb4640fb0cc17a638"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderHeader (cyclomatic 29): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderHeader has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). Of this number, 23 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 6 belong to one function literal inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3742}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a27514ed9cdb224da0ed7e8be6698350bb34ce7a732b6584f7789cfb6bf68c4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Process.Execute (cyclomatic 27): Process.Execute has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Process.fs"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"034e445e187efe2acb755b63a09854500bd02bd68b9b1dd167e5a643d5def1cb"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.formatToolCall (cyclomatic 26): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.formatToolCall has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function so the top-level body reads as a short sequence of named decisions. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2959}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bed8a1e5de071d2627a3c1c02bd146f543c00deae51d3018cf8b38b939e50e5e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.getTreeNodeDisplayHtml (cyclomatic 23): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.getTreeNodeDisplayHtml has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3015}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"06e6e6766e413b2e652abeb597b47fc3c920e73cb0a410668d1dd4ec24f19901"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.computeStats (cyclomatic 21): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.computeStats has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3699}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2aa70f2ad1dee9bdf7afdd4b9fa3b4c663e1585e27fcdc574f4d6a23140f7656"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.recalculateVisualStructure (cyclomatic 20): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.recalculateVisualStructure has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). Of this number, 18 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 2 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2820}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a739415d285c99df2adfe21e3ca4fa11cec9684deb8ff60cf7a92be8ec8f0fa5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.filterNodes (cyclomatic 18): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.filterNodes has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). Most of this is not in the body itself: 1 of the 18 points is its own statement and the rest belongs to one function literal inside it that branches (line 2759). The decisions are inside the literal, which nothing outside this body can call, review or test on its own, so splitting the enclosing body is not the move available here. To reduce it, lift the literal\u0027s work into a named function or method at the enclosing scope and have the literal call it, then reduce whichever part then reads as the largest. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 8 of the 13 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 127 of the 173 points over it (73%), 3.8\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 33). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2756}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8979697efa907737183bb4ae150b667f8c7e5fed3f24b3f71bb0f41c761c3476"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.SplitArgsIntoFsxcArgsAndUserArgs (cyclomatic 16): Program.SplitArgsIntoFsxcArgsAndUserArgs has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsx/Program.fs"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28e453b6cecdfca83fa7d7c55a782b2ca46cb4f52cd611f5aff0683d3299e527"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.ParseArgsInternal (cyclomatic 16): Program.ParseArgsInternal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e25dde5e55fe6fa80957866b9069c0a2b3c8b6f4962087dac8cd23e9c9318b5a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderToolCall (cognitive 109): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderToolCall has cognitive complexity 109 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 30 (64 pts), ternaries 10 (27 pts), boolean chains 14, loops 1 (3 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 53). Of this number, 104 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 5 belong to 3 function items inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e1dceabc2c5f3f9f994c315d7fcf1998100ce39dfa6da7d15d78877e9713a58"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderEntry (cognitive 102): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderEntry has cognitive complexity 102 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 24 (60 pts), loops 4 (17 pts), ternaries 5 (13 pts), boolean chains 12 (nesting depth added 57). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3550}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98c3d4de09c146af0382c00c6c2970cc402a840d4f5b49431f083371d86312ff"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.ReadScriptContents (cognitive 45): Program.ReadScriptContents has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 18 (26 pts), match/switch 6 (19 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a800deab6020a9d8d1802fce18221efbc681ae07bf3817f749a3f206cb04b9d7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.BuildFsxScript (cognitive 44): Program.BuildFsxScript has cognitive complexity 44 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (20 pts), match/switch 9 (20 pts), loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ae2ef71953aacb4b1c487cce4cb3c49b452dbd4983955ba66133c72e22d0307"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.computeStats (cognitive 41): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.computeStats has cognitive complexity 41 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (27 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: this score is depth rather than breadth \u2014 most of its points come from checks stacked inside one another, so the work sits several levels in. Invert each enclosing check into an early exit (a return, or the language\u0027s equivalent) so the happy path stays at one level, and where a level cannot be exited early, lift the block it encloses into its own named function. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3699}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92e3ecdc8164f784ace3b7f915b97017900d1219bf0dbad839a1cc8468dc1d69"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.getTreeNodeDisplayHtml (cognitive 37): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.getTreeNodeDisplayHtml has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (27 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 3, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 20). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3015}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62d641a85bbc1ea2d8c3594eb2811f64ff711859d40e0dccb62a23e20bdebecf"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.buildTreePrefix (cognitive 28): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.buildTreePrefix has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (16 pts), if/else 6 (9 pts), boolean chains 2, loops 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2646}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ddf39c34fd40cd7b511b13937eb429b32382ca293b52da150ea2693d7003b72"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.recalculateVisualStructure (cognitive 28): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.recalculateVisualStructure has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), loops 7 (8 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 8). Of this number, 25 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 3 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2820}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7fe87709698cdcf341e6de67303e88364d6c1e0f3d7b3b03b5223561e4a3f070"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Misc.SyncCopyDirectoryRecursively (cognitive 26): Misc.SyncCopyDirectoryRecursively has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (22 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 13). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Misc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":338}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fdfce3a139fd3c4c8d5541f5f58fc208be3a8065011359d7be764b5a5b871b1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderHeader (cognitive 24): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderHeader has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 14 (15 pts), boolean chains 8, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3742}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e94bdcb372a35886dc02eacf47649d67b03b5f10017ea62c69509f4550cbb27"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Process.Execute (cognitive 22): Process.Execute has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (10 pts), match/switch 7 (8 pts), boolean chains 2, error handling 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Process.fs"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cf47cfcde6fe17c3a9ab48595c9ebb7de84861283b65b9c01174c3d123737f0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.SplitArgsIntoFsxcArgsAndUserArgs (cognitive 21): Program.SplitArgsIntoFsxcArgsAndUserArgs has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (18 pts), match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 13). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsx/Program.fs"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d45da1df2138f443f023f30e434098d3399dbfff66c9e4c7bf0c0511a5f2bf2a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.formatToolCall (cognitive 20): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.formatToolCall has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 10, ternaries 3 (7 pts), if/else 1 (2 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2959}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"72ca3f7dedbba57582831d6dd1c3a0b370e64d2ae6c9dead34545bce57ba6e60"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.ParseArgsInternal (cognitive 19): Program.ParseArgsInternal has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 4, match/switch 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 4). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":105}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"448d8a01dc11a9023b344fe75ad65b6d2e4bdb6fc0ac82cbbd8af5b5df975ba1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.flattenTree (cognitive 19): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.flattenTree has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (6 pts), ternaries 3 (6 pts), loops 4 (5 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). Of this number, 16 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 3 belong to one function item inside it that branches. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":2571}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0e571482459fabceb84e2fda5e326b8fd64d18378e884a5e334958f7fd8687f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderTree (cognitive 19): pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html.renderTree has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (15 pts), loops 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 10). Of this number, 15 points are the body\u0027s own statements and 4 belong to 2 function literals inside it that branch. To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html holds 10 of the 21 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 277 of the 372 points over it (74%), 4.3\u00D7 the next-largest file (src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs at 64). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":3088}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12a397dc57e6f2e2e9b9ee39cf195377e5b4a63c824762f9c396d053b1f8d4d6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Misc.GetCurrentVersion (cognitive 18): Misc.GetCurrentVersion has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (9 pts), loops 2 (5 pts), match/switch 2 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Misc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":734}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88f7a37c5524b709a61b66929c9aa976a4ef0cbb5864e0ce1b39875873de1685"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Network.IsIpv6AddressPrivate (cognitive 17): Network.IsIpv6AddressPrivate has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Network.fs"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0025d82a541803b44589929df2a3a9ea4f89b37c80e3bac2cbf2afd91325d94f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Network.IsIpv4AddressPrivate (cognitive 16): Network.IsIpv4AddressPrivate has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (14 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Network.fs"},"region":{"startLine":370}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f7d37c75a7c7e4321e5ebc3b45c9f0d6f66bbfe7260b3fc8aa22ebbf467c376"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Process.ExecDefault (cognitive 16): Process.ExecDefault has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (15 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Process.fs"},"region":{"startLine":390}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ca3cf7f058659d2bc56f576696fffe0f9c28122d1efe8f86902f2f9522a3397"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Program.GetParsedContentsAndOldestLastWriteTimeFromScriptOrItsDependencies (cognitive 16): Program.GetParsedContentsAndOldestLastWriteTimeFromScriptOrItsDependencies has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 4 (10 pts), match/switch 2 (5 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":420}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed738cbc61645cf11afabe15d52a3ea8aa43f1bea53530f17d525e25f8dcf48f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html: FileTooLong \u2014 2368 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1868 over it, 4.74\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e820f213b17e0938d1ad80a032ed3232508a41e3539ad2e3203382bdfeda3f2b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Fsdk/Unix.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 917 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), declaring 49 functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 417 over it, 1.83\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Unix.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"224d55b1051b0043e2e807d14bf54bddf53908c35514777d4b98654b26417c48"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: fsxc/Fsxc.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 822 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 322 over it, 1.64\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bfd5f07427771721359957f30811310f0ae5fc0ebb464e1207273ff60f3decf4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Fsdk/Misc.fs: FileTooLong \u2014 697 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), declaring 33 functions. The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 197 over it, 1.39\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Misc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eea384f9eb48c43af8bd0e7d1ba750e22bcf249116300b1d92cb8c05a3e6155e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): src/Fsdk/AssemblyInfo.fs:16-40 | src/fsxc/AssemblyInfo.fs:16-40 \u2014 \u0060src/Fsdk/AssemblyInfo.fs\u0060 and \u0060src/fsxc/AssemblyInfo.fs\u0060 are one unit implemented once per sibling directory, so they are most likely parallel implementations of one contract rather than a copy of each other \u2014 this scan matched 1 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 25 lines. If both are selected at run time, neither can be retired in favour of the other, and the lines that DIFFER between them are the reason both exist. The move that pays here is to hoist the identical part into a shared location the whole family can reach and give what differs a parameter or a seam, so a change lands once instead of once per sibling; extracting one helper per block leaves every sibling to drift on its own."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/AssemblyInfo.fs"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8bb9bc8ed83ebed630d73237bb11059848232e2de22c5ed5e44a4e5b6ca7642"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): src/Fsdk/Unix.fs:702-716 | src/Fsdk/Unix.fs:725-739 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060src/Fsdk/Unix.fs:702\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Unix.fs"},"region":{"startLine":702}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e4c5269d9c3b5f6cad290b669ae9e9ec31bfd69d728ea7fed5f9879806ea3035"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): src/Fsdk/Git.fs:28-35 | src/Fsdk/Unix.fs:629-637 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Git.fs"},"region":{"startLine":28}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f75ceae183fde889e4a27da90569bcb3b639491140f1c32af3aa3b8bc5f5fdcd"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Outdated: FSharp.Core: FSharp.Core 4.7.0 \u2192 10.1.402 available (referenced by fsxc)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk.Tests/Fsdk.Tests-legacy.fsproj"},"region":{"startLine":41}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f64096180e70f48e5ec363b4d6b9a2d6c276a6eaa97877a0d0909e31df7de7b"}},{"ruleId":"D12","level":"note","message":{"text":"Outdated: coverlet.collector: coverlet.collector 6.0.2 \u2192 10.1.0 available (referenced by Fsdk.Tests)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk.Tests/Fsdk.Tests.fsproj"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b648f212d8f7c5bf2c840bfe597ed82a6f93a38c0ddd7e4a5c0e75437f819492"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/Fsdk/Process.fs: src/Fsdk/Process.fs changed 7 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 27 in Process.Execute at line 188. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 6 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-03-20..2026-06-18, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-03-20 18:11:03 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-06-18 18:11:03 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/Fsdk/Process.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/Fsdk/Process.fs"},"region":{"startLine":188}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"758e6066c95da3b1dd506e4f5a55b1289efc1fe854a65e0d34a353096651cdd8"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs: src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs changed 2 times in last 90 days, max cyclomatic complexity 32 in Program.BuildFsxScript at line 458. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-03-20..2026-06-18, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-03-20 18:11:03 \u002B08:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-06-18 18:11:03 \u002B08:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"src/fsxc/Fsxc.fs"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24e2019356ba69d1810eb35bab5b1be1c05fee09f02e8eedd2ed65338beda82e"}},{"ruleId":"D20","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs found: No ADRs found. No recognised ADR directory (\u0060docs/adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/decisions/\u0060, \u0060adr/\u0060, \u0060docs/rfcs/\u0060, an \u0060ADR0001/\u0060 folder, or their siblings) exists anywhere in this tree. What was searched, so you can tell an empty log from a search that missed one: every directory under the tree (build output, dependencies and VCS metadata excepted), for a document that is either any non-index page inside a recognised ADR directory, whatever its name and however deeply nested (\u0060docs/adr/use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060docs/adr/2024/0001-x.md\u0060); or a file anywhere whose name is ADR-shaped (\u00600001-use-postgres.md\u0060, \u0060adr-012-caching.md\u0060); or, when neither turned anything up, a document carrying the decision-record signature (an \u0022Architecture Decision Record\u0022 heading, or Status / Context / Decision / Consequences as section headings). A decision log that clears none of these \u2014 unnumbered files outside any recognised directory, without those headings \u2014 is not seen by this check and this row is then wrong. If that is your case, say so rather than renaming anything; otherwise, consider recording architectural decisions in \u0060docs/adr/\u0060."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2bea044ff79d7d275f5a91a6e2f548586178eaf480274c33960ad020c854631"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0137e67d2af9818e204fb89aa7a562c1cbd86019567a037c3af4f422badcdf61"},"properties":{"commitSha":"2699b1e77680df23e81e6ee8c6b963152cedb3d1"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"956a4d51a23d41b85e2f5684fd76a8f1a41f3684ccfdac3b58e9ad7a2d4eebfe"},"properties":{"commitSha":"14deca289798ce31908a77344324558c4bdc047b"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ee10fec2c541019d1d292252b9f6fd023ac99970bcfb5eece661dff34fea674"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c15753256ad5e6def29b6bbfee337030240c4be31221d7706e8ae53d48bac610"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42070d3c47a7342513aa13b4da40c6529d43d392d442134dddf61dc1bc4b031e"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c57ff7ee4f5493fd19f9027d26752196d0f66f7a9bc394273afdf83bfd8064a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e07e8018242dbfe2798da895b9e799af2eab88d82bc34801efa6670faf2d3ede"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"458bbd04949473b9960e3be7ecdf42aa5c5013515f78ca455526ac82ec94eb6c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46d835d424ea2d7460546e9c340c918c2e7ed899e3523aaf3a43f62265fb8e8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25f99693acc0330371459a3525e21a749a0a1fdbc3fd010528848ad13d9489cb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3ca2d47b953188339215c359797bfbee7a037fa5eaf27f598143958fb47ab1a5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c402ac3524d0b09891e8a6aa7dec06a81c1077771ab91e1735e482e6919501a7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62d3f5df99be339a918e6d928763fadfdb3ed45886559df974aff8b0732840ff"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c00b95b438490af57c10a7fe4446d8d9ab0c832385cee6cdabbacbada7c8af2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c3aa63aa6025524c5b8b5fe622beec6f18cb344429e55deb3ed5d820b2e9047"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e44239d30b8933ef48bbdaf91d2ede82e852e4ea508c5601d6f6cc0f20d515f5"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-1329","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78d9b12440d6b465249e79cc2fbf4c0c0999b93ae90905ff893e7b08c1806bfb"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de1ece33f823098261dc0e2e7a49148608cd5520435907046ebcdb499b48c6ef"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-125","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98f260fd8060d436486a37786eb7b813e1aa1d968968ec75abb5a1ee5648181a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1333","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46b1c80e510de85f94ed06844c772bb16338bb0b404af6e497f5090b252fcf9d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-125","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e21bd3d6f80c009e2dc5d34a5c6f68548dbd86720cf463b5f99582c5881c0846"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-125","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9511f55f3a32e839e8a0bb164e00d3511530738d8d8d08fbd93cf9581d26e6e3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-125","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0e17f71490e4d120a48b2b2881ab866c93b272bef2febb673a3e8e42b2c288ab"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9658270ba49f37ed04e99ab1263b6393cd42aed8bdfb7aafd9fa1070f5491895"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"AC2","level":"error","message":{"text":"\u003Cinput\u003E without a programmatic label: This control has only a placeholder \u2014 a placeholder is not a label (it vanishes on input and many AT ignore it). Add a \u003Clabel for\u003E, a wrapping \u003Clabel\u003E, or aria-label."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":1137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f71896b5d622a8257e996c225c37c43ed1def98af4dc1423d0203d919a95eb2f"}},{"ruleId":"AC6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Animation without a prefers-reduced-motion guard: This stylesheet animates but never checks prefers-reduced-motion, so motion-sensitive users can\u0027t opt out. Wrap motion in @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference)."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"dev/pi-session-2026-05-30T05-58-52-446Z_019e7776-c31e-70ba-b2d3-6e09131e38b3.html"},"region":{"startLine":7}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce415a8cc3d902f017e1a33c89e587109b39af5d340fc0ccebaf9aae1efd210f"}},{"ruleId":"AC7","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Accessibility enforcement below the top rung: No accessibility enforcement found \u2014 no automated accessibility check runs over the HTML your app renders. Assert the accessibility invariants over that HTML in the test suite you already have (parse the output and assert, or drive a browser), and gate that test in CI so a regression blocks the merge. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 1 markup file(s) this pass actually assessed, the linter configuration checked in beside them, and this repository\u0027s test and CI files \u2014 matched by name against the accessibility checkers this dimension carries. An audit run outside the repository, a hosted scanner, or a check whose name is not one of those, is not seen here."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d46019b86eff5ddad9db289e6802ac158899e980df54c34f67722442787ead62"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README claims fsxc and fsx disable warnAsError via --w flag but the evidence shows no such option \u2014 searched for: \u0060--warnaserror\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b514d099e9ef3bcf8c81e8702bd085193a7cf82b8f7bfbae7ebeedfeb2e93639"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: README advertises a RAG / ML engine, but no ML/RAG code or dependency exists \u2014 searched for: \u0060rag\u0060, \u0060langchain\u0060, \u0060llamaindex\u0060, \u0060pinecone\u0060, \u0060weaviate\u0060, \u0060qdrant\u0060, \u0060embeddings\u0060. Each was matched case- and separator-insensitively against file and directory NAMES anywhere in the tree, and against the CONTENTS of manifest files (package.json, *.csproj, *.props, *.slnx, *.yml, Dockerfile); the README\u0027s own prose never counts, so a claim is never refuted by merely being made. Nothing outside that search was read \u2014 a footprint living only in a submodule, in a file type not listed here, or under a name none of those terms matches is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"641c12de6a27c56ae4f356e613243d119d1728768480ea36e3ea12271e12b02c"}},{"ruleId":"P2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No structured logging: No logging or diagnostics emission found. This repository ships a binary its users launch rather than a service you operate, so there is no operator to page \u2014 but when a run fails on a user\u0027s machine, neither they nor you have anything to read."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f10d71351c6778ebe84e761f82a90d4f9ed6c64f5e01975ede8fda7e4e2ebc5"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 plus gitleaks for committed secrets (F# is not a CodeQL language and has no language-specific SAST engine) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 5793 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P4","level":"note","message":{"text":"No release approval gate: The release is automated and no gate that pauses it for a human is DECLARED IN THIS REPOSITORY\u0027S PIPELINE FILES. What was read: every file under \u0060.github/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.forgejo/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.gitea/workflows/\u0060, \u0060.azuredevops/\u0060 and \u0060.azure-pipelines/\u0060, plus \u0060.gitlab-ci*\u0060 and \u0060azure-pipelines*\u0060 \u2014 with comment text stripped, so documenting a gate is not declaring one. What would have counted: GitLab\u0027s \u0060when: manual\u0060, CircleCI\u0027s \u0060type: approval\u0060, an Azure \u0060ManualValidation@\u0060 task or an \u0060approvals:\u0060 block, a Jenkins \u0060input\u0060 step, a \u0060uses:\u0060 step naming an approval action, an \u0060environment:\u0060 paired with \u0060reviewers\u0060 / \u0060required_reviewers\u0060 / \u0060protection\u0060 / \u0060wait-timer\u0060 / \u0060deployment_branch_policy\u0060, a draft-release step, a \u0060workflow_dispatch\u0060 promotion, or a release-event gate. \u2605 What this cannot see, because none of it is a file: a GitHub environment whose required reviewers are configured in repo SETTINGS, a branch protection rule, or an organisation deployment policy \u2014 all of them real, enforced gates that live outside the repository. If yours is one of those, this row is wrong and nothing in the tree could have told us. Otherwise: whatever the release trigger points at is published to users unreviewed, so a mistagged or unverified commit ships and the only remedy is a follow-up release."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c11e2dbd483b4b423b95ac61bfcc7af1d55351b28a20d2b1105b31cfe38cc60"}},{"ruleId":"SC1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NuGet dependencies are not locked: No packages.lock.json and no central package management \u2014 restores aren\u0027t reproducible or pinned (SSDF PW.4.4). Enable \u003CRestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003Etrue\u003C/RestorePackagesWithLockFile\u003E (commit the lockfile) or adopt Directory.Packages.props. Advisory \u2014 never scored."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a97b4f69ccac509400ece7eedefb06d3ede0522cd4d8bcb5c068bea719545a6"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1104","guid":"4c918cb5-b2a6-6c55-9963-a44ee464305e","name":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1104.html"},{"id":"CWE-125","guid":"98717707-96bf-ca5b-9568-8d1d257574c1","name":"CWE-125","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-125"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html"},{"id":"CWE-1329","guid":"f70f1c3f-4ccf-cb5e-bdd3-03ba4868d36d","name":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1329.html"},{"id":"CWE-1333","guid":"11a336ce-63de-c45c-845e-29ca1e8df13d","name":"CWE-1333","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1333"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1333.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","guid":"cc7f4610-8859-e654-9029-d5f97d992220","name":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-05-Insufficient-PBAC"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":29,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}