{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P2","name":"Observability","shortDescription":{"text":"Observability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P2"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genMacro (cyclomatic 34): CompileRW.genMacro has cyclomatic complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1089}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64ae056aab129a10e2fe1394af28e6f955de0b90b205df310a92c11bfc16f34c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RWMacros.extractFieldConstraints (cyclomatic 33): RWMacros.extractFieldConstraints has cyclomatic complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"145ff2bd0429192a531d5ea429cc928ce3dac4fabcc8281ad4bb131f3c287407"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FabricGenerator.apply (cyclomatic 28): FabricGenerator.apply has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/FabricGenerator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"206dd120e65685d636042888f864521725482c001076045daa6712208b8d74a6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimpleJsonParser.apply (cyclomatic 26): SimpleJsonParser.apply has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"io/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/io/SimpleJsonParser.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e41f92dfacd9b92a78b85e61f29e62816a239e6b8fdf5150a2ed7a584d8bd91"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.extractFieldConstraints (cyclomatic 20): CompileRW.extractFieldConstraints has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1391}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3327dfd452f2fd40f5f0543b59de054dcba08e7f15b9ce472ea6b9ea67c8d0d2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Definition.merge (cyclomatic 20): Definition.merge has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/Definition.scala"},"region":{"startLine":182}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cdcabc3d0a38c0432989af0796d7100a4de5d0aba7ede612de15ce308d5b880"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genPolyRW (cyclomatic 18): CompileRW.genPolyRW has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":719}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"562f00ae1dfd9fc6fcf28ac54dd9a392a1787206d69cf3a08bd295349c1b93a4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Str.escape (cyclomatic 17): Str.escape has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a588a576f60af518b5205ca620b0f4a1c62d1af138ffb7dd9c5536c3b0751af"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Definition.toJson (cyclomatic 17): Definition.toJson has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/Definition.scala"},"region":{"startLine":379}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df913011721db4fe9ea8a6d452cd907b6893e1be5d816653f342ea2546dfbf67"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genMacro (cognitive 61): CompileRW.genMacro has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 31 (36 pts), match/switch 12 (21 pts), boolean chains 4 (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1089}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8694957d0195fb6e3fab5074fdda6887637f89490be8821812e63bbcad9a876"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RWMacros.extractFieldConstraints (cognitive 42): RWMacros.extractFieldConstraints has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 27 (37 pts), match/switch 5 (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04ecf269317fb99b86d45e4d68022569a8b5ba0781c665995ace03939e1e3a3f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genPolyRW (cognitive 31): CompileRW.genPolyRW has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 10 (19 pts), if/else 8 (11 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":719}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6619b8c37c06b78aeb40b30719a161cb4869e81c536795b29f15b1888694dccc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FabricGenerator.apply (cognitive 29): FabricGenerator.apply has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 13 (17 pts), match/switch 9 (11 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/FabricGenerator.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3376da70db5471374953e0850c007eaef6262cdb3264fca04c865cd790293d8a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Delta.delta (cognitive 28): Delta.delta has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (20 pts), match/switch 3 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 14). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Delta.scala"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d870b16aa7dbe5dded1309ca9e003ab7a5eb4364fee2d63ccc8ddf20a08996a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genCollisionUnionMacro (cognitive 27): CompileRW.genCollisionUnionMacro has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), match/switch 7 (10 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":874}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a0b375dc345d5e42c4d800be09420ea02dd37ca55fb21829e6981f6b3cc24e6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Json.modify (cognitive 24): Json.modify has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 6 (18 pts), if/else 6 (nesting depth added 12). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"92b5f11f346aeb24cfccac19e1846313bd97afb4ddc9715444844eb26d0f4b98"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genDispatch (cognitive 23): CompileRW.genDispatch has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), boolean chains 6, match/switch 2 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 6). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":435}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"afb08a3c7dc7dcccdda6b89548d992b609c5534f5bec1ee8e8b3cf87f308ca8f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.generateDirectConstructor (cognitive 22): CompileRW.generateDirectConstructor has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (11 pts), match/switch 5 (9 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1548}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"01f2f168aa89f4cf071fdf1c9c3b63668a1454f899347dab73fda953283edd93"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Str.escape (cognitive 22): Str.escape has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (12 pts), match/switch 1 (4 pts), boolean chains 3, loops 2 (3 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b961048bcf744f32d8618ff4530224571d3066cd96cf9d8d432a7c3f1c4cea1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SimpleJsonParser.apply (cognitive 21): SimpleJsonParser.apply has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 9 (12 pts), match/switch 6 (7 pts), boolean chains 2 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"io/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/io/SimpleJsonParser.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f3280c0b75bef6e820cd278781fce02104c1716eb5b0d31d7ae7da6e63c93e43"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.fromMapElems (cognitive 19): CompileRW.fromMapElems has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 5 (11 pts), if/else 5 (7 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":269}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a252d727b47b5b5f1d2bbb3c8335c86f1cc27a293c1c66e658e4199280425676"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"RW.poly (cognitive 19): RW.poly has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 8 (10 pts), if/else 9 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/rw/RW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"832de503cfa38d67800c81e7e203b39529eb816c7ebbf12cd683ee71742485cc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"GeneratedClassExtras.write (cognitive 16): GeneratedClassExtras.write has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), match/switch 1 (2 pts) (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/jvm/src/main/scala/fabric/define/package.scala"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54aea12c077e3d0d5d27bf188b87ac26b75e5cb7a96a674d43032d6783f50fd5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CompileRW.genSealedTrait (cognitive 16): CompileRW.genSealedTrait has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 5 (8 pts), match/switch 4 (7 pts), boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 6). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala holds 7 of the 15 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 94 of the 175 points over it (54%), 3.5\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala at 27). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":89}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91fdedc666924b0854417aa0f40c0db65c05408394015b146023f9c3b9f96dd2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: rw/CompileRW.scala: FileTooLong \u2014 1043 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 543 over it, 2.09\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c321137486e195101e1e3bcfb9a2c3c80ec4f759578546f1a3cd7a90b6490359"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: Json: TooManyMethods \u2014 62 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 32 over it, 2.07\u00D7 the bar. This type is on a published API surface \u2014 a MiMa binary-compatibility gate (build.sbt) declares its compatibility contractual \u2014 so moving members onto a smaller type is a breaking change for every consumer, not a local refactor. To reduce it, treat the split as an API migration: move each cohesive group onto its own published type and keep the old members as deprecated forwards for a deprecation period, removing them at the next compatibility break. Where the surface has to stay as it is, that is a decision to record rather than a change to make."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1046a39748127f4717d591d197eca6a9c3efae5444f418405cbbc6b2beef4a0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: CompileRW: TooManyMethods \u2014 40 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 10 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. This type is on a published API surface \u2014 a MiMa binary-compatibility gate (build.sbt) declares its compatibility contractual \u2014 so moving members onto a smaller type is a breaking change for every consumer, not a local refactor. To reduce it, treat the split as an API migration: move each cohesive group onto its own published type and keep the old members as deprecated forwards for a deprecation period, removing them at the next compatibility break. Where the surface has to stay as it is, that is a decision to record rather than a change to make."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":312}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"114fa12f8bf4fd7db26fd0d547bb56ee55fc10441a07305abf04fa40c80672f2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:1090-1101 | core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:1549-1561 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1090}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"94bfcdcdaeb7d4eb8bfccc8f826f28ff859180479a3617876681587fce59f77e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:352-362 | core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:456-465 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:352\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala"},"region":{"startLine":352}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"492206163427286864c954a24ace50cd5251ba5e22390687a9ca4756566622bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:786-796 | core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:933-942 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:786\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":786}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e405d9a70ee27581b4ca07100d409453690b26b8cf485c65646b48df97c1a8f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala:614-623 | io/jvm/src/main/scala/fabric/io/JsonEscaper.scala:77-86 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala:614\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":614}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b23f58d21a2a8d5c4a3a0c396a02bb761124a894c3b64d2de9389804e84c5d1a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:206-213 | core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:297-304 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala:206\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d14f2af5a3e8c732781ef96a85ce473b7eecdd9231e3e246523bc0ddd342b3f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:111-118 | core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:800-807 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13a5986e30aec02d46479fee3a6850efab9abfb7a57fefe76944ca27a8a6e8fa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:1337-1342 | core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:1361-1366 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala:1337\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb469cd2e924bd61f0e687623a87d32c6802186a725f3b28b6f3561119cabbc3"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: core: core: abstractness 0.14, instability 0.00, distance 0.86 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 2 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"deda6fd6cb2c3d74f7dc0fecd76cc36d1d58966a5bcb861efc01f7e84f6f398d"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 34 in CompileRW.genMacro at line 1089. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-12..2026-10-10, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-12 14:32:58 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-10 14:32:58 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1089}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb9bf0fbb28f89b747ed86e4a095e0ea81541ce7456e5a9f9af80fd859badde6"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala: core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 17 in Str.escape at line 602. Frequent change and high complexity in one file compound: schedule the next change to it to include carving out the part being edited, with the area under test before it moves. Counted over 2026-07-12..2026-10-10, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-12 14:32:58 -05:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-10 14:32:58 -05:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala"},"region":{"startLine":602}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1c547cfe6fc1163563c7d8b3ae33a3df178b81840d87c207c7ab55f0f152b49"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 14 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/Definition.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Json.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala-2/fabric/rw/RWMacros.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/rw/RW.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/rw/PolyType.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/rw/RWImplicits.scala, core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/DefType.scala (\u002B6 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6f4b5ecd9132b929cba17f7d2e349bdcae5c1de2c82efc629f7d32b736ee099"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Switch to JsonParser when JacksonParser can handle this properly \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"io/jvm/src/test/scala/spec/gen/RWSpecGenParse.scala"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"38ac72ef2eac19a33acaefe6b274f1b2d6c01374768e55787f82e95ca10c06f5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // TODO: Re-evaluate this \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"io/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/io/SimpleJsonParser.scala"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"19a236872a1a364f42238c21e0a81833bf1eca066ffc49ce55adc87e5c3ce809"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (8915 LoC, 252 module-visible types across 26 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28847bfb68128ad6c95eb6a19a3df3a0787d1bdadcf090baba24802b8a233364"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"703b990f6d9a60db46de372b4bc3713bc769740b61be7dfed2b23b523664ac12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"729e5bc298ad01143d3c74eded9450e85148cb8c1a021945ef116207704fc7f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04cc6ef8b2713c5ae671a21c5adfc62ed3d32eec231bd27236ea49e066082d50"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc17439367157c6f6ff8590f4dfe29bc3a0ce4e328d99df310f8a49a2877af10"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc26593caf509b487cb3dff9d1a587737a02c72fc5e13e59c1a151f7d6412ad4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36277bee0c8295bb8eb3bc0beb5fb978eebe1486d553ab0cd28084b35ebb8343"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baa151beff35ac46ee2536907cc918a207da07c42b004fec4c9aab8d58a6df6d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e8a627e7020ac8119c8ec6c60ce9a9f6a161d947c9dd66552a2bad9e055ffb9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f57d1d312afdbea5e586f5c4277469ac5784f32d5ade2a108c78d246b6a0be52"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8e8b172cf327825d1cf42b544ee79199814e271b1cab65813357983ba6a8730"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4af17c2699f15d319f250a9e3015d66b6ddba774fbe1c98f445c426bc7efa3b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75a453b3669e7eccf96e1c1132e7a5954f24f5d079b0c29c4868e4537437f325"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d82c4333539a19ca5c108f55ff4d7b1319eb666b261c25f68380d2601e8601d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc3b539f953f180f304780b633bbb65e6d2911ce57503f2f0e4a05dfd504060"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7c14eeb322dbc9864bb67d269c811acd8c6c7d07f97073f14914344d5aca508"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77e2e71a4329e551cbe8be7023c7191820e375353d80fbebb52a3572f6943665"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40652d854c8cb92e4c0834fbf63cd0f58d62adac2a1d84ac4bb3b2ab9a3ee258"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"160e2c022b6238ef52ff3ad183b76fd0a9989579e03525741548023e42401129"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c1b27f444ee9d48ae76463cfd1bb763c2d0286df94968144ab53792bf5c9449"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf12a422c2697fd5314e3de6cd35602ce0b6f09768cef2de794124de3fa821c2"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"jackson-core","version":"2.21.4","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90ef8645d5d250a2cdd6c4ddecf434c2439a3eaf0b71b0b76b3e93b4d1bb9e49"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"353b07f894bf23fcd9c95baadeb419e69f71bfda1f355a56f6616b61d4c3531d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a49f7258d6462e217377d928ac769d04402737d5a5abe55a54005e378b8b79e1"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe274ba5adebde25ca0b3db842e44cbb1aaeb7cfecfbb7215cd452596ba1f4c2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Blanket warning suppression: A bare \u0060// scalastyle:off\u0060, \u0060// scalafix:off\u0060 or \u0060@nowarn\u0060 (or Wartremover\u0027s \u0060warts.All\u0060) switches every rule or warning off \u2014 hidden debt. Suppress the specific rule on the specific line, with a justification, instead."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala-3/fabric/rw/CompileRW.scala"},"region":{"startLine":52}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"506d14be135f8ff77a36f59d4d3c7d6d8fd4909b1ba13d1e0387317f8e6d4883"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No structured logging: No logging or diagnostics emission found. This repository ships a binary its users launch rather than a service you operate, so there is no operator to page \u2014 but when a run fails on a user\u0027s machine, neither they nor you have anything to read."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f10d71351c6778ebe84e761f82a90d4f9ed6c64f5e01975ede8fda7e4e2ebc5"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add scalafix or scapegoat (or \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060, which runs on any language) as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 11441 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"PF1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Benchmarks don\u0027t track allocations: A JMH/Jetpack Benchmark suite exists but nothing turns on its allocation measurement \u2014 allocations (the main way hot code pressures a garbage collector or allocator) aren\u0027t being measured."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"bench/src/main/scala/bench/ParseJsonSmall.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a08ae80089988b174837f81f9b63b44e04446468b614876524bff6a2c8bda5ad"}},{"ruleId":"X15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Length read from the parsed input is spent without ever being bounded: \u0060size\u0060 is read from the bytes being parsed at line 138 (\u0060getInt\u0060), then used to size a \u0060new Array[Byte]\u0060 at line 139 \u2014 and nowhere in its scope is \u0060size\u0060 bounded from above \u2014 compared to a limit, clamped, or checked against the input that remains (a zero or sign test, or the loop that counts up to it, bounds nothing). Whoever wrote those bytes therefore chooses the allocation directly: a 32-bit length asks for up to 2 GiB before a single byte of the payload is known to exist, which either exhausts the heap with an \u0060OutOfMemoryError\u0060 or, negative, throws \u0060NegativeArraySizeException\u0060 out of a parser whose failure path was written for malformed input, not for hostile input. Bound \u0060size\u0060 against the bytes actually remaining and a maximum the format allows before allocating."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/cryo/Cryo.scala"},"region":{"startLine":139}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c45dbab0abd78426abfc8376248fd92a8b13389caa8c461e1427a1f43454c1f"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060Delta.diff\u0060 is public, takes a document from its caller (line 31) and hands it to \u0060Delta.delta\u0060, which calls itself at line 70 with a piece of \u0060json1\u0060, not as a tail call the compiler turns into a loop \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060Delta.delta\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. On the JVM\u0027s default 1 MB thread stack a walk like this one throws \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 from about 500\u20132,000 levels on a cold first call and 6,000\u201317,000 once warmed up (OpenJDK 21 and 25), while \u0060ujson.read\u0060, Jackson\u0027s \u0060readTree\u0060 before 2.15 and circe before 0.14.16 accept any nesting (2,000,000 levels from 4 MB) and circe 0.14.16 accepts 4,096 \u2014 on a cold JVM even play-json\u0027s cap of 1,000 is past the point the walk fails. \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 is not \u0060NonFatal\u0060: \u0060Try\u0060, \u0060case NonFatal(e)\u0060 and \u0060recover\u0060 do not stop it, and in a \u0060Future\u0060 on the global execution context it leaves the future forever incomplete. Thread a depth argument through \u0060Delta.delta\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/Delta.scala"},"region":{"startLine":70}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b355011f772c8e37e1a0c45a10a6d801ea2c8a7492d15ba41ff8978cec5a2e5f"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060Cryo.bytes\u0060 is public and takes \u0060json: Json\u0060 from its caller, and it calls itself at line 49 with a piece of \u0060json\u0060, not as a tail call the compiler turns into a loop \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060Cryo.bytes\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. On the JVM\u0027s default 1 MB thread stack a walk like this one throws \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 from about 500\u20132,000 levels on a cold first call and 6,000\u201317,000 once warmed up (OpenJDK 21 and 25), while \u0060ujson.read\u0060, Jackson\u0027s \u0060readTree\u0060 before 2.15 and circe before 0.14.16 accept any nesting (2,000,000 levels from 4 MB) and circe 0.14.16 accepts 4,096 \u2014 on a cold JVM even play-json\u0027s cap of 1,000 is past the point the walk fails. \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 is not \u0060NonFatal\u0060: \u0060Try\u0060, \u0060case NonFatal(e)\u0060 and \u0060recover\u0060 do not stop it, and in a \u0060Future\u0060 on the global execution context it leaves the future forever incomplete. Thread a depth argument through \u0060Cryo.bytes\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/cryo/Cryo.scala"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc83456230789e08bcf0ec127e174613f515620c947f1f3223fa981667b05b75"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060FabricDefinition.apply\u0060 is public and takes \u0060json: Json\u0060 from its caller, and it calls itself at line 40 with a piece of \u0060json\u0060 (and at line 41), not as a tail call the compiler turns into a loop \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060FabricDefinition.apply\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends one stack frame per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. On the JVM\u0027s default 1 MB thread stack a walk like this one throws \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 from about 500\u20132,000 levels on a cold first call and 6,000\u201317,000 once warmed up (OpenJDK 21 and 25), while \u0060ujson.read\u0060, Jackson\u0027s \u0060readTree\u0060 before 2.15 and circe before 0.14.16 accept any nesting (2,000,000 levels from 4 MB) and circe 0.14.16 accepts 4,096 \u2014 on a cold JVM even play-json\u0027s cap of 1,000 is past the point the walk fails. \u0060StackOverflowError\u0060 is not \u0060NonFatal\u0060: \u0060Try\u0060, \u0060case NonFatal(e)\u0060 and \u0060recover\u0060 do not stop it, and in a \u0060Future\u0060 on the global execution context it leaves the future forever incomplete. Thread a depth argument through \u0060FabricDefinition.apply\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/shared/src/main/scala/fabric/define/FabricDefinition.scala"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d513a415f68c51289f1450314c62727a0de0595d4a10416c14e354c1bcbeeb9e"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Scala\u0027s null is not held to the type system everywhere: No build over this repository\u0027s 113 Scala product file(s) passes \u0060-Yexplicit-nulls\u0060, enables WartRemover\u0027s \u0060Null\u0060 wart or runs Scalafix\u0027s \u0060DisableSyntax.noNulls\u0060, so every reference type admits null and nothing reports a \u0060null\u0060 written into the code or returned from a Java API \u2014 the first one to reach a method call is a \u0060NullPointerException\u0060. \u0060Option\u0060 by convention is a habit no tool here holds the code to."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23e7c3c6da50151f07723c64ca4f881fd5903e713d143161a7c0594ad7ba29cc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A01:2025","guid":"df693558-c822-0452-8f7b-4d53cb6bcc59","name":"Broken Access Control","shortDescription":{"text":"Broken Access Control"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A01_2025-Broken_Access_Control/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","guid":"cc7f4610-8859-e654-9029-d5f97d992220","name":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-05-Insufficient-PBAC"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":28,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}