{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX2","name":"Stateful singletons","shortDescription":{"text":"Stateful singletons"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX2"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX6","name":"Interface segregation","shortDescription":{"text":"Interface segregation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX6"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"PF2","name":"Allocation hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Allocation hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF2"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.pollerMetrics (cyclomatic 21): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.pollerMetrics has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08224f79abddf0117d7b0bb74737f53b9052d21885f8e2bbd3e6a6e0de01fefb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.pollerMetrics (cognitive 210): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.pollerMetrics has cognitive complexity 210 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 20 (210 pts) (nesting depth added 190). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6aaf1745caab32349a36971a60d652454b791f3a54b882268ec6bdf8f5b2938"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.computeMetrics (cognitive 28): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.computeMetrics has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.timerHeapMetrics) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":864}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99db2337ad0b9af7d829c6195302381c4808adabfe9f7930e48c7795f3cc05ba"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.timerHeapMetrics (cognitive 28): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.timerHeapMetrics has cognitive complexity 28 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (28 pts) (nesting depth added 21). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.computeMetrics) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1047}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da5048378bf43ac6370ab4fc5904702ee7aaf658a2866f899b8fe9fec08891c7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Validation.isKeyValid (cognitive 24): Validation.isKeyValid has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (19 pts), boolean chains 5 (nesting depth added 8). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"03d7cf6180f2a2ee99956e437b60ae6d7ba3153d89d36bd0674f458861a1b4b9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.register (cognitive 24): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.register has cognitive complexity 24 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 7 (23 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 16). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":823}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ec7ff7adc31ad1548448ff4eedebc11a8abd6a337da8680506a5dfe553b8e09"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.threadMetrics (cognitive 21): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.threadMetrics has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.localQueueMetrics) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":934}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e8ae058b02ea236c3a140a73b93f47a148ab45657071a3e794563bf45f8d9b1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.localQueueMetrics (cognitive 21): IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.localQueueMetrics has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: loops 6 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 15). To reduce it, break up the iteration: give each loop body a named function, and split a multi-phase loop into one function per phase so no single body carries the whole pipeline. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.threadMetrics) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared. This file is where this pass\u0027s cognitive complexity CONCENTRATES: instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala holds 6 of the 12 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 242 of the 268 points over it (90%), 26.9\u00D7 the next-largest file (core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TraceState.scala at 9). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":985}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"370ab40e67503a5af6df6d66e0dbfc81a83c288446db9f3b910f7c99ee319aa8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Impl.check (cognitive 21): Impl.check has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 20 (21 pts) (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/logs-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/logs/LogRecordExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a0d0ff459b4e6e5a23c8acf56105820a04e912cd2c424f5db5809e257bce82a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Impl.check (cognitive 19): Impl.check has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: match/switch 4 (12 pts), if/else 5 (7 pts) (nesting depth added 10). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/TraceExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":114}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"374c7451d72b9a66ee6e7902b5179f6e990fbe4e177e1887c02d88076f6c3516"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"HistogramImpl.check (cognitive 18): HistogramImpl.check has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts), boolean chains 1, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":458}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70d37ba7064876d052e5bd54186be2ae39325bda4159b20cd350ee70c8f8e679"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ExponentialHistogramImpl.check (cognitive 17): ExponentialHistogramImpl.check has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 11 (16 pts), match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 5). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":534}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86a863fff4eb3d5c3853d05d242d92850c22d06126452ae11a8bc8f093109aea"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Impl.check (cognitive 17): Impl.check has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 12, match/switch 3 (5 pts) (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd428da5841db334027d8a7711d019bb8bd65a4fea93cc97724e597c989b1d2a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.any: MethodTooLong \u2014 any runs 123 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 23 over it, 1.23\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b1a3e9a2563b4bc5fc97c5e0771788aa612d7be41f9e7c338e95a2db3afa66c8"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.name: MethodTooLong \u2014 name runs 122 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":251}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c600ae8e52a0cb665a39c199d280ec687a95da762bd3a0567aef659c5f05fdc"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.internal: MethodTooLong \u2014 internal runs 121 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 21 over it, 1.21\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c9c69638e99e3ebc354efcd6bde1c6ae91c3f076d879e7cba771b100688c05bd"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.server: MethodTooLong \u2014 server runs 120 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 20 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":257}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d59a8a075d0f6ee2ac71ddd5e599bef95229e94d3c001a32f8b908a40d438c4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.client: MethodTooLong \u2014 client runs 119 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 19 over it, 1.19\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b05745624f7ab21f4b6a84663500c2e70ab7f2c3702d6ff61f49526eab28fc0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.producer: MethodTooLong \u2014 producer runs 118 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.18\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b5048db131311dafcfbb19151e0b9360aac22189dd9a7fb3d12fba96bce4a55e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SpanExpectation.consumer: MethodTooLong \u2014 consumer runs 117 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 17 over it, 1.17\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/SpanExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":266}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84507f058945dc843c7d322c49d372ef5b8a2301fd1db96d86dfa7a07f6b5a3a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:74-109 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:115-150 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:73-111 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:117-155 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9342fe955a136cc36b7076716e0f33d5f940c6bcddf0e73c5afa6255fac4abf5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/all/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/OtelJava.scala:167-187 | oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/Conversions.scala:28-48 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/all/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/OtelJava.scala"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4df916e3b033ccc65590bbc105495e0b1c1e1cb2a4d4a854e5b94e3ab805d695"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17\u201319 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:484-500 | oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:553-571 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:484\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":484}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bde0b3545d46c2f21cd97e0b86e640d7d8f290ad5540090935dfc06cad09bcc9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201318 lines \u00D7 2): instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:993-1010 | instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:1055-1070 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":993}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9f239443d76dd278477c83867b03f412f8f3309a7218f7c78ccb5f08f6d10ac4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:104-121 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:164-181 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:104\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":104}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90b5d23353f5b0bd0be06fd413c4763f9543224a854cbed01478a3b6da5ab516"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:86-101 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:146-161 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala:86\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/HistogramBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"001b4438ea0ab7cdd0b5053882f128c899802876aac35d44f2343c911302656f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:85-100 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:129-144 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:85\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc9db0d8f4201ac0e223c3c6540ef82e0ef2ed2db10077c2df671aabb74ef0ef"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:86-100 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:118-132 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:86\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81edc0ce86dfe8f8e3d734b9f0acadf6dda9f55dba98cd1844821527fe845715"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:990-1003 | instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:1052-1063 | instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:1115-1127 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala:990\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"instrumentation/metrics/jvm-native/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/instrumentation/ce/IORuntimeMetricsPlatform.scala"},"region":{"startLine":990}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"76d6453853dbc3f5a05d9ea252a568d5732c9523f18783e8009b4201c2048e37"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/TraceExpectations.scala:99-112 | oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/TraceExpectations.scala:120-133 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/TraceExpectations.scala"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1cea50e90cd75507b001f2e254bbae9fb791dabd98f956533444a7a8e8ef7e2a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:86-98 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:127-139 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:86\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4ede05ce12b2b983b891113cb85058ef0114f15b403735c1f420271b5155a94a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:174-186 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:172-184 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:174\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":174}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e636f1f59d67babc17db177a0a47e5cd010a1ec67ff82fb0915488035de9a33"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:206-218 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:204-216 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:206\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":206}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41014218237452a295dd2f8fafb28add87797da4f89131685eb5146f391a2a5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 4): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:87-96 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:128-137 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:86-95 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:130-139 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:97\u0060 calls \u0060dec\u0060, \u0060record\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:98\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64ca1499d380f2cd064960047b7661cb8b202f6f8f581dc94aca3ad104a8a885"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:113-122 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableGaugeBuilderImpl.scala:99-108 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:111-120 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4690f9075d94d6e9c72954d2a86d0bd412971a19cdf489c045639f82d26612e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:74-83 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:115-124 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala:74\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/CounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9d5acdc07197f8825ba10a0602b5f9ecad034c30ba201ffd2399096fbf1ce08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:74-83 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:106-115 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala:74\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/GaugeBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e96f3696d852c6d32c4854286d9593ac9a90d265cd684faf378f8cd621a5842"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:73-82 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:117-126 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:73\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/UpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d0f7475ca90e66aa6416fcffb04a6efa869c11b7a530fbe7390d49d6e971496"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/AttributesExpectation.scala:94-102 | oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/AttributesExpectation.scala:116-123 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/AttributesExpectation.scala:94\u0060 it runs out through the closing brace of the declaration holding it \u2014 the window is that declaration\u0027s tail, not a fragment that begins part-way through something, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/AttributesExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7dde3c377fd858d29cbc45ebff4aa2b1afcb0bac88dc771728f7b1362df1891"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Counter.scala:166-172 | core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/UpDownCounter.scala:176-182 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Counter.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/UpDownCounter.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 82% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/UpDownCounter.scala:183\u0060 calls \u0060dec\u0060 and \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Counter.scala:173\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Counter.scala"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58391abb19b34761ddb7a5e417dbbbf918afd1e988cec0bd1e99a050792e2e09"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Gauge.scala:156-162 | core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Histogram.scala:198-204 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Gauge.scala:156\u0060 it does not close everything it opens, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Gauge.scala"},"region":{"startLine":156}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"caff840630787f9f3986ea75219fe944f9eb0e6623299143deba6f2cafe858aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:465-469 | oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:545-549 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala:465\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":465}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0484720ae1cddecba2f238423af013e534ec9ce2eecbdedd56474210626ca94d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32 lines \u00D7 2): core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/CounterMacro.scala:71-102 | core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/UpDownCounterMacro.scala:87-135 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/CounterMacro.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/UpDownCounterMacro.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/CounterMacro.scala:71\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/CounterMacro.scala"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7184769bf1fc754e4c53612ee016ac1dc3a154f14877890e69892d0137d59817"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/GaugeMacro.scala:55-69 | core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/HistogramMacro.scala:143-197 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/GaugeMacro.scala\u0060 and \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/HistogramMacro.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 89% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/GaugeMacro.scala:55\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/metrics/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/GaugeMacro.scala"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9dd3b4591c404cc391030e5041ddf82d01945d6c6833c7649c3f64542f789b62"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 4): oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/InstrumentationScopeExpectation.scala:96-100 | oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/InstrumentationScopeExpectation.scala:105-109 | oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/TelemetryResourceExpectation.scala:78-82 | oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/StatusExpectation.scala:60-64 \u2014 there are 4 copies across 3 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 4 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/common-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/InstrumentationScopeExpectation.scala"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13367c7e2f064adc20f36e8c20bb38035033d3b1547d4e87125cfe97fa94ee0f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala:87-93 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableGaugeBuilderImpl.scala:85-91 | oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala:87-91 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableUpDownCounterBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 43 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/metrics/ObservableCounterBuilderImpl.scala"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9112720d771614ba65c72015f0c96f6bedbc9396654adfaaf168e7de1b336c62"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 29 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/PointSetExpectation.scala, core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Meter.scala, oteljava/metrics-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/metrics/MetricExpectations.scala, core/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/SpanFinalizer.scala, oteljava/testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/OtelJavaTestkit.scala, core/metrics/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/metrics/Histogram.scala, oteljava/trace-testkit/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/testkit/trace/TracesTestkit.scala, core/trace/src/main/scala-3/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/SpanBuilderMacro.scala (\u002B21 more). Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6414d34fa9a9290fea4c11601e84722d935d4731656aed503026b96032ea2c7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: // todo: dynamically enable/disable an instrument when Meta.Dynamic is fully supported \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060// REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"oteljava/all/src/test/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/trace/SpanBuilderSuite.scala"},"region":{"startLine":27}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97c3037e168037bbc41277e217131d64a87698b4a99688e97b2b6a6d2f953fca"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (22753 LoC, 2596 module-visible types across 43 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28847bfb68128ad6c95eb6a19a3df3a0787d1bdadcf090baba24802b8a233364"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A01:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"703b990f6d9a60db46de372b4bc3713bc769740b61be7dfed2b23b523664ac12"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"729e5bc298ad01143d3c74eded9450e85148cb8c1a021945ef116207704fc7f2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04cc6ef8b2713c5ae671a21c5adfc62ed3d32eec231bd27236ea49e066082d50"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc17439367157c6f6ff8590f4dfe29bc3a0ce4e328d99df310f8a49a2877af10"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc26593caf509b487cb3dff9d1a587737a02c72fc5e13e59c1a151f7d6412ad4"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36277bee0c8295bb8eb3bc0beb5fb978eebe1486d553ab0cd28084b35ebb8343"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"baa151beff35ac46ee2536907cc918a207da07c42b004fec4c9aab8d58a6df6d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e8a627e7020ac8119c8ec6c60ce9a9f6a161d947c9dd66552a2bad9e055ffb9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f57d1d312afdbea5e586f5c4277469ac5784f32d5ade2a108c78d246b6a0be52"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8e8b172cf327825d1cf42b544ee79199814e271b1cab65813357983ba6a8730"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4af17c2699f15d319f250a9e3015d66b6ddba774fbe1c98f445c426bc7efa3b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75a453b3669e7eccf96e1c1132e7a5954f24f5d079b0c29c4868e4537437f325"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d82c4333539a19ca5c108f55ff4d7b1319eb666b261c25f68380d2601e8601d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6bc3b539f953f180f304780b633bbb65e6d2911ce57503f2f0e4a05dfd504060"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7c14eeb322dbc9864bb67d269c811acd8c6c7d07f97073f14914344d5aca508"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77e2e71a4329e551cbe8be7023c7191820e375353d80fbebb52a3572f6943665"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"40652d854c8cb92e4c0834fbf63cd0f58d62adac2a1d84ac4bb3b2ab9a3ee258"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28fb95c74cf7e51a3f6e58d6d5d9aaba698bdc10ef21fbd45c72dc90736c26c6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"417c80d37e40c8c101c97e32ba9af1a95439f85918a11b7f2f630d08f638a53d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aff3f09c70375ae301d2f3e5d7b851c35db1a85fffcfe6e2f77d8979ba9b7431"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5ff6c36cc77c52281fa395ac6b9e1e18754b22fb93caffb8d30a7715d1e22e8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5303d5adf5ee3f86820f6138837f7e7d87cb15862d82ba9aadc4501bbe1e9984"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a618793b2757574d28796da0abb139eb5b5fe27e487d02dc63636e793f0a8158"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a5c7a5c8262c14d7ceade84922b20594a601737a67ff26aa6d53e142ee6f117"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"efce61f66e39d36a211f88bd6c5bec1339fd388aeb0b3ade4d8fa0ad1687eeef"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"96f88121b035a898a6759141862415469563ae4858d3bd2449d90d5e5ba04a57"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D30","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9c35e870a12f3374abd154fc25ce46dbb976259382b4351b340f71d5668c23a"},"properties":{"dependency":{"package":"http4s-client_2.13","version":"0.23.33","advisory":"[GHSA redacted]","aliases":["[CVE redacted]","[CVE redacted]","[GHSA redacted]"],"reachability":{"kind":"unknown"}}}},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling: TracerMacro.scala \u2194 SpanBuilderImpl.scala: \u0060core/trace/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TracerMacro.scala\u0060 and \u0060oteljava/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/oteljava/trace/SpanBuilderImpl.scala\u0060 change together 62% of the time (8 of the 13 commits that touched whichever of the two files changed less often, counting a file under its earlier names as well \u2014 a repo-wide or module-wide sweep is evidence about the sweep rather than about any pair inside it and is left out of BOTH sides of this ratio, while a dependency bump, a formatter/rename sweep, or a commit whose edit to one of the two files was a tool directive such as //go:generate or whitespace only is left out of the shared count ONLY, so the two sides are not taken over identical commit sets) with no explicit dependency \u2014 the edge is real but nothing declares it. Read the pair before acting: if one registers itself into the other through a hook or an initialiser, the missing dependency is DELIBERATE \u2014 the registration is the link, and it is meant not to be an import \u2014 and the thing to add is a comment on each side naming the other, not a merge; if they simply belong together, co-locate them; if neither holds, the coupling is hidden and worth breaking. You can check this without leaving the row: of the 8 shared commits counted here, the most recent 3 are \u006022ff66ba\u0060 core-trace: \u0060SpanBuilder\u0060 use macro to preserve laziness; \u0060005df377\u0060 Enhance core APIs to support \u0060Attributes\u0060; \u0060b5ca7810\u0060 Simplify \u0060Tracer\u0060 and \u0060Span{Builder,Ops}\u0060 (at that commit the file was still \u0060java/trace/src/main/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/java/trace/SpanBuilderImpl.scala\u0060) \u2014 run \u0060git show\u0060 on any of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/trace/src/main/scala-2/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/TracerMacro.scala"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0639fb3abe8673cd77b550fa29b5007962e21ea84603196c1beda6304dc2c9fe"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b213f6eedd4b140d0bc37bdf1496f72811a643f34064f12518b32e9e83bcfc7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb00976a698a5d68999b7ee6d27206fd374e916853e7ff1ead5eed42386f043f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90f83b4fa27db32740afe9540c905f3c0499caed87f61049a8a903ecc95b41c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90ef8645d5d250a2cdd6c4ddecf434c2439a3eaf0b71b0b76b3e93b4d1bb9e49"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"353b07f894bf23fcd9c95baadeb419e69f71bfda1f355a56f6616b61d4c3531d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe274ba5adebde25ca0b3db842e44cbb1aaeb7cfecfbb7215cd452596ba1f4c2"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"core/trace/src/test/scala/org/typelevel/otel4s/trace/SpanBuilderSuite.scala"},"region":{"startLine":281}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d550a8a6538bd9ad26e372a20e58b51bae01d4aa4a403cbe742eab142954ca04"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/instrumentation/metrics.md links to \u0060name\u0060, but \u0060docs/instrumentation/name\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/instrumentation/metrics.md"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"839eb99e292aee03499c6440e073b6ef58a75e06bd20a91e156b1d532b523442"}},{"ruleId":"M4","level":"note","message":{"text":"README/code drift: docs/instrumentation/metrics.md links to \u0060f\u0060, but \u0060docs/instrumentation/f\u0060 does not exist. Checked without a model against the repository: its files and folders, the scripts and dependencies of every package.json, the projects, namespaces, package references and target frameworks of the .NET build, the SDK and Node pins, and the identifiers of every file that is not a document; the documents\u0027 own text never counts. A footprint generated at build time, read only by a platform, or living outside this repository is not seen, and this row is then wrong."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"docs/instrumentation/metrics.md"},"region":{"startLine":354}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d88348d743c16fc3a7b59444afab49d2f9fa66daf1d126220d2c5b6f51a85991"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Scala\u0027s null is not held to the type system everywhere: No build over this repository\u0027s 151 Scala product file(s) passes \u0060-Yexplicit-nulls\u0060, enables WartRemover\u0027s \u0060Null\u0060 wart or runs Scalafix\u0027s \u0060DisableSyntax.noNulls\u0060, so every reference type admits null and nothing reports a \u0060null\u0060 written into the code or returned from a Java API \u2014 the first one to reach a method call is a \u0060NullPointerException\u0060. \u0060Option\u0060 by convention is a habit no tool here holds the code to."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23e7c3c6da50151f07723c64ca4f881fd5903e713d143161a7c0594ad7ba29cc"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A01:2025","guid":"df693558-c822-0452-8f7b-4d53cb6bcc59","name":"Broken Access Control","shortDescription":{"text":"Broken Access Control"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A01_2025-Broken_Access_Control/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","guid":"cc7f4610-8859-e654-9029-d5f97d992220","name":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-05-Insufficient-PBAC"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-8","guid":"b6b2dacf-a168-4957-876e-a8c73ee00eb0","name":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services","shortDescription":{"text":"Ungoverned Usage of 3rd Party Services"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-08-Ungoverned-Usage-of-3rd-Party-Services"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-9","guid":"b3d36727-0395-5b51-94c4-5e173d62eab3","name":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Artifact Integrity Validation"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-09-Improper-Artifact-Integrity-Validation"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":34,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}