{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D5","name":"Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D5"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D8","name":"Code Coverage","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Coverage"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D8"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D27","name":"Navigability","shortDescription":{"text":"Navigability"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D27"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"]}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"]}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D39","name":"IL Efficiency","shortDescription":{"text":"IL Efficiency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D39"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX5","name":"Architecture \u0026 structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture \u0026 structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX5"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessItem (cyclomatic 686): LayoutController.ProcessItem has cyclomatic complexity 686 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3429}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ba6ef670c5f6024bf76040cdf5819c9faaf9f22029f527d5734d812a10c1d30d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessRSSItem (cyclomatic 221): LayoutController.ProcessRSSItem has cyclomatic complexity 221 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a1c27dc7d9972865cd91e589fcdfdd4b9cd9a62555b5fe15d72b9d9109253e0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 205): Search.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 205 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":370}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"607b4f767f1a1c2b2998a6e856013258a12b509b67d8d8d2c191ad7b0c5315a5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 188): SearchSmall.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 188 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1792}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3496e4cc9d6e670e14ed241987b3a4b372cc00dbdd32dab0fae9785867ac1e4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.RenderCustomField (cyclomatic 160): LandingPage.RenderCustomField has cyclomatic complexity 160 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":910}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90a739fe9eed192183b60d9fed583326d4e3fce1b92bf2cf825d616039195627"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.RenderCustomField (cyclomatic 152): SearchSmall.RenderCustomField has cyclomatic complexity 152 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":707}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22992bb99a153afe6144789c6c62035906d0e5a96bd9502672d98c96753721fc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 142): EditProperty.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 142 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e9e8fca167972c342eb9251a5e03a7f8d0c669b329beef583cd93b972efb5726"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessOptionItem (cyclomatic 133): LayoutController.ProcessOptionItem has cyclomatic complexity 133 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad7cafc1ea1d0c646a42d4c38abf3da4ec81401e9961dabc27bc34fb681d0a15"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_Default.ReadQueryString (cyclomatic 105): _Default.ReadQueryString has cyclomatic complexity 105 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1e10753b578a8fde9d5ed54c8a106e76a919f3936b9d200c69c5f93ce5d2d1ad"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Update (cyclomatic 102): EditProperty.Update has cyclomatic complexity 102 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":575}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0366ddd1574432751a20d3ec71f5e2e42f018aa938a3b5d0ed2fdc14b320068e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.ProcessHeaderFooter (cyclomatic 87): ViewType.ProcessHeaderFooter has cyclomatic complexity 87 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":725}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"867e995f3ce1b42ece8df50e5ef2b8a28bbff33cbb18a109a64b0d32151b7e61"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessComment (cyclomatic 82): LayoutController.ProcessComment has cyclomatic complexity 82 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"88bbf440e8db909e3cb0bd384ee9fc644ce7599b81b0b27556106003a34364a7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.ProcessSearch (cyclomatic 72): LandingPage.ProcessSearch has cyclomatic complexity 72 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":488}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1848ca70707ad741b94b4ebc42dc4d83fb72239d668dcbe1357970ef4a192cb1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.Search_Click (cyclomatic 70): SearchSmall.Search_Click has cyclomatic complexity 70 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1502}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ebcf447242b513b15cb253c5c0628dd54f005e0c5e3ce96d7e51522acbb2bf8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.cmdSearch_Click (cyclomatic 69): SearchSmall.cmdSearch_Click has cyclomatic complexity 69 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2714}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9036e3e0ad7ec0c542584961bcd32914d8bda30479e1e0c35440d9c4f6f7afab"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.cmdSearch_Click (cyclomatic 68): Search.cmdSearch_Click has cyclomatic complexity 68 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1292}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"49fc8a74f175add8a63d02e9c8fab309df5ef7c80c135df90ead90a6cb660a42"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.Search_Click (cyclomatic 67): LandingPage.Search_Click has cyclomatic complexity 67 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1718}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e39b969388129d4c7410c5722df95c0b4060cae23da92a707b73cf5c918f65ff"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetFieldValue (cyclomatic 66): LayoutController.GetFieldValue has cyclomatic complexity 66 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":466}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c3901a552e1a6dd57b91d0209b39e9a954fc35b20000b2069a02979029d14b6f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.ProcessSearch (cyclomatic 65): SearchSmall.ProcessSearch has cyclomatic complexity 65 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":353}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3572ead3e82df74b8335c0e6371c5e794905ecd52ae1592920c44b0337f53075"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditLayoutSettings.BindSettings (cyclomatic 64): EditLayoutSettings.BindSettings has cyclomatic complexity 64 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":374}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ebf8c8d87d757c84d6b34708400c6985256f48d43c6c5c257e96db473b1e980"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.ProcessEmpty (cyclomatic 58): Latest.ProcessEmpty has cyclomatic complexity 58 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":489}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e6be786cde1302f4ad939f3caa1666953b59db2aa0818a41771e4811f644b355"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cyclomatic 55): CommentForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cyclomatic complexity 55 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0d0152a9c94518c731e29df2543b36a32f887910b9c5e06dcea3bdba64af5f16"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessExportItem (cyclomatic 53): LayoutController.ProcessExportItem has cyclomatic complexity 53 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1836}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b7d42470a83e3f2691212c324fc1bae18ca7aba8d00eb8dc54bf0da8b2308bf"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPermissions.cmdUpdate_Click (cyclomatic 48): EditPermissions.cmdUpdate_Click has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"191eaa9c614ccab49b54a4d904e32927f1fe005a274cf7537568267c0c78460d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessType (cyclomatic 48): LayoutController.ProcessType has cyclomatic complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fbabb3e14802c6d549832e068247d75131466738bcd76cd23052a389c7ced8e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.BindDetails (cyclomatic 45): EditProperty.BindDetails has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"130c3df0ef5c203ffde288c2ded33af5da36baace523caa293a38a2591ba50b8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.BindProperty (cyclomatic 45): ViewType.BindProperty has cyclomatic complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4225b65ea502529edb7e0c04b0482acbaf177f27c3f22fbb1b85cfadfb2d2320"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ChangeTemplate.InitializeTemplate (cyclomatic 44): ChangeTemplate.InitializeTemplate has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"108952f5ecb7744d4f5972ca27e7f5c0bee924d0682e4c3141007ace9414be00"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cyclomatic 44): ContactForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cyclomatic complexity 44 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a734ad2fd6d4a7f9fb5e3130e5cf3861f89fd89d2c50cbbb5416280cdf660d5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NotificationJob.FormatTokens (cyclomatic 40): NotificationJob.FormatTokens has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"015a08c15f19762eaadf54f213d92c8fea7034eab2ae7c0f375d01d2ce2c742f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReminderJob.FormatTokens (cyclomatic 40): ReminderJob.FormatTokens has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57233b9aaa1396ba47fb7f5843f9a2fcc67dfe0e2a898eba7403e1120b42b197"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.BindLatest (cyclomatic 40): Latest.BindLatest has cyclomatic complexity 40 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02939bcc13c31c439834cfbb1792308ad7c7638460b2be5d88fd432295907b78"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jquery.lightbox-0.4.$.fn.lightBox (cyclomatic 39): jquery.lightbox-0.4.$.fn.lightBox has cyclomatic complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JS/Lightbox/jquery.lightbox-0.4.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"299cae70c59612bd273e292b9844fbd07d4bdced764c7217d50f18b980b58362"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetLayout (cyclomatic 38): LayoutController.GetLayout has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a1fa64f248c53482af32123bdcba403373be171645d3d0810413b5b797a5d86"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewProperty.BindProperty (cyclomatic 38): ViewProperty.BindProperty has cyclomatic complexity 38 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b17237cd5626c971c2a94fde28eb60e977714f9eaa3ef5bf898cf58f39b09934"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 36): ContactForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9308c1644a28e85b2b00a54b747dbf7b654ca0280d3b059b382003025f0619f4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessReview (cyclomatic 36): LayoutController.ProcessReview has cyclomatic complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"125b89e4c773629a14bd2ea382f86dab6b2a94a134826774680ebf8f1f27606f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessPhoto (cyclomatic 31): LayoutController.ProcessPhoto has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7010}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec080be86d8f6ae0c6affbb3213307ac75c21e561e8c5d58c09bb4e9e8b2f11b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CurrencyConverter.ConvertCurrency (cyclomatic 30): CurrencyConverter.ConvertCurrency has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CurrencyConverter.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11bf1384824a5856d689694f8307208d36d94983070e9ef82760e093bbf1f446"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Page_Load (cyclomatic 30): EditProperty.Page_Load has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42f774887ba5ff9e1db10bc01ac5a3f7cbf705d7f6f52ed43ac361ae272ab3a3"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.BindSortBy (cyclomatic 30): ViewType.BindSortBy has cyclomatic complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":261}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4526ae37da0176506d84fe623da015cd02920a32c12ba89021f6dfe6f7fe567"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SendToFriendForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cyclomatic 29): SendToFriendForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cyclomatic complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4c1694a64004255d669565a4eca5ca0ba471128c2611a78778ab5d47af63ff7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReviewForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cyclomatic 28): ReviewForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9cce6eda8d250497721d5a22fd5e931ca9aa03a67988d5ac23eecf3fd9da67ed"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditLayoutSettings.cmdUpdate_Click (cyclomatic 27): EditLayoutSettings.cmdUpdate_Click has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":824}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58d5b1a5f324db2dc3624dd908a681a597da3bbcfc4f47d0d7be6c33000d56bc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.BindSortBy (cyclomatic 27): Latest.BindSortBy has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"21c9fa759fa8d4735cc99346d0f1d733e29713568d42c71c9d349409e8e1521e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 27): SearchSmall.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1af6c79bd537be7281fbfb9bd78aff93f5bd321eaa202b5eb338a3674d246ed2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReminderJob.SendReminders (cyclomatic 26): ReminderJob.SendReminders has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"11c4427a5a56001ef9b0bbfabc595b9d6815ecbba0d4341f5e627e4331e579f6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.BindCustomField (cyclomatic 26): EditCustomField.BindCustomField has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcff47b8f43c7470d7c7a63d4da6a4e2d8629ccdbc5643c85d8e28dd26ea72e3"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PropertyController.GetModifiedSearchDocuments (cyclomatic 25): PropertyController.GetModifiedSearchDocuments has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertyController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3b8fb28f2cf6c9bf96585cc1e9e5b9d517316f8910e0b0e3d505b5326a1ecb4"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.LoadSettings (cyclomatic 25): LatestOptions.LoadSettings has cyclomatic complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":558}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b8ae76984833c888f27bbac8bb846b85083cc2d4b32776c035f6fc9637d39a3"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.ProcessHeaderFooter (cyclomatic 24): LandingPage.ProcessHeaderFooter has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":366}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a4ef0d0861af7e86cbe189da025ca7be1299a77c97cdc5d5d4e760a3c6aa10f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoStandard.cmdUploadPhoto_Click (cyclomatic 23): UploadPhotoStandard.cmdUploadPhoto_Click has cyclomatic complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoStandard.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb67ed1fa646d2f37c7b93fa5f125a9a3af6544bf744f99e319bfd3f851ea6b9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PdfRender.ProcessHeaderFooter (cyclomatic 22): PdfRender.ProcessHeaderFooter has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"PdfRender.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22cb8ceeb3a85e24a84073a2a18bf54059814b6de2feeb9d5d380b727a0421ea"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReviewForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 22): ReviewForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97c630aeac2905ba469f06deda4d11570155ecb352c8047a022424843079bb4f"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.cmdUpdate_Click (cyclomatic 22): EditCustomField.cmdUpdate_Click has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":531}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"903d13a9cdc7d20a2db9bef0473d14b04d6b3d976345ae8001e7f02e778448a0"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessMessage (cyclomatic 22): LayoutController.ProcessMessage has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7495}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77aa83bea3ebb2b5897c0505ac32165281aad370c67ca24c944c32713781abde"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 22): LandingPage.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2065}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64e602f568a340cbdc07f2054d7818bc38835e7d0df706e5ef242b1955dfc5a1"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 22): SearchSmall.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3056}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"46a73d6758017e453677a2cef4e68a8d070ccb23d892240d7c0d07cbcc9e6efd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewProperty.ProcessHeaderFooter (cyclomatic 22): ViewProperty.ProcessHeaderFooter has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dff29126404799b69b4e3e2ffe4f22fc5e5141948219097827a22de3fe29636e"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cyclomatic 20): CommentForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":511}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"085994d2e61aec7266d1365b235e13ed7fea773e5f8c63877146f4408b37915b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_Default.ModuleActions.Get (cyclomatic 20): _Default.ModuleActions.Get has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":490}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0554592321c349ba8126afe85411fc731403b574419d46be2368406d25bd6492"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged (cyclomatic 20): LandingPage.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged has cyclomatic complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43a8065543b4ccc5f4cf34110392d656ca68ae8cfc2caf6ff07ef0a7baffc1bc"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SWFUploader.ProcessRequest (cyclomatic 19): SWFUploader.ProcessRequest has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"899744d7041f48f3f76b0cc05958e0482ccddea72297dfc9a27533ec4d1999b2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetTypeLink (cyclomatic 19): LayoutController.GetTypeLink has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2f4380a702daba5ba4308e53e53b25476e37ee8ab140eef8ae315af3473fc4fd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.CommentFormFields.Get (cyclomatic 18): CommentForm.CommentFormFields.Get has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c4df923418f1aa31eae28cfa2b481b880730d06487b097bb25e2412021ff79d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.BindSearch (cyclomatic 18): SearchSmall.BindSearch has cyclomatic complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"802406572b289239ab291a36af9144744452c8fb20eee9d4018fcd54fb51759d"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewContactLog.BindContactLog (cyclomatic 17): ViewContactLog.BindContactLog has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewContactLog.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3eeb1cc8530974999354dd52ebf0b0220e8e932c2840590e9d1cda42aef479a8"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetPropertyLink (cyclomatic 17): LayoutController.GetPropertyLink has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":376}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a47714eb087c128eb9252047b720ad1f63675b352c29d261eeef7e9c087fc26b"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessRSSHeader (cyclomatic 17): LayoutController.ProcessRSSHeader has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9fdafa711ada28b1e2514d381a321829f8ccf86f72e021e2420aef327b20033"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.GetAdditionalParams (cyclomatic 17): ViewType.GetAdditionalParams has cyclomatic complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1072}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2093a322f29e584cde5f0817b67e9563d6b326927ac58f075bd98de3489de14c"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemCommand (cyclomatic 16): EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemCommand has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c3eee049e887bb3e1e25504dba677fb2f85ca0db395acf2c29f972054c79d11"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Page_Initialization (cyclomatic 16): EditProperty.Page_Initialization has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c67147f7f7e5e9bd8642f04ee2dd1ced81dbb95fae5e60f635d3b093e078a94"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.LoadStyleSheet (cyclomatic 16): LayoutController.LoadStyleSheet has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table. This file is where this pass\u0027s cyclomatic complexity CONCENTRATES: Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb holds 15 of the 77 methods over the threshold \u2014 including the worst \u2014 and 1260 of the 3272 points over it (39%), 2.6\u00D7 the next-largest file (SearchSmall.ascx.vb at 491). No single row can show this, because each is measured only against the threshold: reducing this one file moves this dimension further than any other file in the repository."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5592a8cd0d3c0bcce7c88540e487b735995304d56c69171ef2771d52a290f3d7"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.ReadQueryStringTotal (cyclomatic 16): Latest.ReadQueryStringTotal has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ea44051824fd107a9af4e34b3944c6a051854253bdccb3d3fec0a9e4cba25ac"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.BindDetails (cyclomatic 16): Search.BindDetails has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e075e8a15497e5c19fb1e84a7320ac3e9723e6720ebb549bbb01fca909a91bd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmallOptions.LoadSettings (cyclomatic 16): SearchSmallOptions.LoadSettings has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc58189a50e5ae30232935da4b6889a80722510215c976215ca4733f7b65d204"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.ReadQueryString (cyclomatic 16): ViewType.ReadQueryString has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the branches: extract each independent case into its own named function, or replace a long branch ladder over a single value with a data-driven lookup or dispatch table."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad124bb466121d6988bed712cb2510102578bb7701b9960b980469addfa46b75"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessItem (cognitive 2844): LayoutController.ProcessItem has cognitive complexity 2844 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3429}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a2b197a979f5e3468695d0bf5ad7d8814708f7512b431896327f6cc4d0898ab"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 1349): Search.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 1349 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":370}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7db5f3a92b8435533562c2040410a353b77ec87bb8d67973ace70c8ecdc0954a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 1160): SearchSmall.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 1160 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1792}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2e42ecaed2be2fea92353713d4f63288e74abd7df6d5c828bd5507c382b9c35"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessRSSItem (cognitive 869): LayoutController.ProcessRSSItem has cognitive complexity 869 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e493e6684e24637a538a70361a19249a7c444f51a65c1019d054d7b9a2772c57"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 832): EditProperty.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 832 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"77a66557e80f03dcb2b0b2ff3d3f12682799c6180881037bd818baeaa65e8939"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessOptionItem (cognitive 676): LayoutController.ProcessOptionItem has cognitive complexity 676 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4997d6647d707f757b717238d666d7db53f79cd601c92164afd7b46971cca9df"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.RenderCustomField (cognitive 538): LandingPage.RenderCustomField has cognitive complexity 538 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":910}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97fcd8f50e55b6fdb63b9cc92b8a1088197720bb50a75081c4e5966783798f56"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.RenderCustomField (cognitive 495): SearchSmall.RenderCustomField has cognitive complexity 495 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":707}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"971ffe032be7a08a78308dcdee1221543097365800fef67be3db7a9065cab0a0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.cmdSearch_Click (cognitive 454): Search.cmdSearch_Click has cognitive complexity 454 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1292}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0598e5cdf42fad8af67ea6c9780248dcf2315e19838b2e0edcef0c2da3c1acbe"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Update (cognitive 429): EditProperty.Update has cognitive complexity 429 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":575}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b361da274d2fe01e06d43a23e0181cd6b0ebc6d4f2e00795a8489698258b5290"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.cmdSearch_Click (cognitive 424): SearchSmall.cmdSearch_Click has cognitive complexity 424 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2714}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c82c8e43741dd9964a884da2f12f1abaadcdf3dfc3a2aaed6d4ffeffb8a94b3c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.Search_Click (cognitive 387): SearchSmall.Search_Click has cognitive complexity 387 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1502}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66c29985c2a48a085ca85f005fe80a7435852d33ad2218ad5df8de9ba99c194a"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.Search_Click (cognitive 379): LandingPage.Search_Click has cognitive complexity 379 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1718}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e5817bc63e6f006aba2c15c8d1c3bab2da1c47247a51df92eda3c757bb08597"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.ProcessSearch (cognitive 358): LandingPage.ProcessSearch has cognitive complexity 358 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":488}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98d5269c158d9b9b1a3413106d0e9257b60c451ebf97142b580ff03d9c4ffa24"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.ProcessSearch (cognitive 320): SearchSmall.ProcessSearch has cognitive complexity 320 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":353}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f76ce7962b4f3e67678d66ae5ae543c90e6c0d40d4af0aab05653b145f311bd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 284): ViewType.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 284 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":725}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e6ee79ccd414d816174e904d296f5b2ea2a6b522ffc80ccbf1f67c08df9b68d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_Default.ReadQueryString (cognitive 270): _Default.ReadQueryString has cognitive complexity 270 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53a799e7dd5e3f3ecf097d51cb9144f44236d4d80a7d7b2013aee13322c0f6eb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessComment (cognitive 266): LayoutController.ProcessComment has cognitive complexity 266 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"721cf4c049fd6fb6153628adcf4423ccb6bee162be471b90144fe26134082ba4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cognitive 191): CommentForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cognitive complexity 191 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fe68ad3373d75bba192d08384c24f65039e08f01aa61350b8e567add5240a824"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cognitive 184): ContactForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cognitive complexity 184 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dc5045aaa47e81959c35a5c98ac5e144ca3102815dd1db85cb09a4482689f5db"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPermissions.cmdUpdate_Click (cognitive 184): EditPermissions.cmdUpdate_Click has cognitive complexity 184 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"48e1bce9518b4dd0bf47b29850f27fbaf5c9d17151d91a5af495c06a0456daf5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PropertyController.GetModifiedSearchDocuments (cognitive 176): PropertyController.GetModifiedSearchDocuments has cognitive complexity 176 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertyController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"434c528831bd057d39566067820ce739af3ce78c0cb9bdd56a84fef56b8f42a5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 165): SearchSmall.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 165 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc8b23b8eff352e568ac84085a05e4fdc2a982b3af61c6619aa32d20a8d7a640"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessReview (cognitive 158): LayoutController.ProcessReview has cognitive complexity 158 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63826fcc42dd723b03641fc5c066acd9f01e6f41ae6748377342d153ea4bfa18"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessType (cognitive 157): LayoutController.ProcessType has cognitive complexity 157 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d57edec9789f3bff22148b0f2f4c06beeb5e4d229781e3d8433bde07790ca0e0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.BindSortBy (cognitive 141): ViewType.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 141 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":261}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4a8828af3d3dc60622129feeb97e0e51ca175f201e22eb14c5a2ec058f3f3df0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 139): LandingPage.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 139 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2065}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"82277323121fe07b9d6b5b25ffe388d9a4bc0a0689afc5d8524a5057ab993af9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 139): SearchSmall.drpPropertyType_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 139 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3056}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"73a47fab91d76493fe5b4e6ddc170586f39d47530259fbafe554758da1cf1685"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NotificationJob.FormatTokens (cognitive 137): NotificationJob.FormatTokens has cognitive complexity 137 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da30bb6a3943dcf51a2d6a553520c371604272e8b840086a992e7d716fd8a5b9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReminderJob.FormatTokens (cognitive 137): ReminderJob.FormatTokens has cognitive complexity 137 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b33c9e7256baeabb9c56d6281bc2be801255bc2f31462a28668bdd7155d67f47"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 134): ContactForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 134 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c5f866424ecd984d9504cc4279ce42374af67f411a13ff666c17c1bb505a5a89"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetFieldValue (cognitive 128): LayoutController.GetFieldValue has cognitive complexity 128 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":466}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acd99a4ea0fd9481fa3618712af2c58bee202578a2532e153f1bc7a53bad867e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.BindSortBy (cognitive 125): Latest.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 125 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":676}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"db2c152cf310fc444c3f322585c812b0ab0d36dca75889534200357b0eb67c6b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 124): LandingPage.drpLinked_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 124 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2153}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1adb1c89b05cb65e20df461b2a647f4067f707acad66a7b8e507862b40782782"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReviewForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cognitive 120): ReviewForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cognitive complexity 120 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2a1f1a262687a5605f109a9efdbf0eba1e42c5ef51d1f8b400171c687b694d2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SendToFriendForm.cmdSubmit_Click (cognitive 112): SendToFriendForm.cmdSubmit_Click has cognitive complexity 112 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3d8ac1b6bd3d7fd5001dedb9448884e6682b46765c6b86080712348eb06f2468"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditLayoutSettings.BindSettings (cognitive 111): EditLayoutSettings.BindSettings has cognitive complexity 111 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":374}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e9274ec7a8730e0892ba5c89334a666505560830cadf8ba35a270a763bc3a9f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessExportItem (cognitive 109): LayoutController.ProcessExportItem has cognitive complexity 109 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1836}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"942ce938e89c0dc40be94d6720799ff252815a1ef0ea80705590ed69947b3860"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.BindProperty (cognitive 107): ViewType.BindProperty has cognitive complexity 107 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c967ed927c9be0a83b6418849bf122e8a465b97e0fcf4ed5a2f127f04c962a09"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.BindDetails (cognitive 105): EditProperty.BindDetails has cognitive complexity 105 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a03e541af1784d61a46a98025e28d0a928534318e92ad8439c8b4233b70cf1b5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.BindLatest (cognitive 105): Latest.BindLatest has cognitive complexity 105 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e83685f56bb5cd2eaedd7149143b0cd1f2f048aee5229ef5212939f388fed00"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 95): LandingPage.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 95 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":366}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"16b86c844e0dc6a8d25220158d5313acdd5cd8b79b397f623e63f1277087495f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.ProcessEmpty (cognitive 92): Latest.ProcessEmpty has cognitive complexity 92 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":489}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5bfb58ca18ff71c20e5825fed981c9d62d4e5e92eb67bf29ee5a27137b2c1cbf"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewProperty.BindProperty (cognitive 91): ViewProperty.BindProperty has cognitive complexity 91 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5a672fbef4c6a1e8d2cecb0fd2615150626e9c905c2d8e87958bb503427c6e85"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.BindCustomField (cognitive 85): EditCustomField.BindCustomField has cognitive complexity 85 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0f69b07460a5e0c79ac3b37c0c5981017b233bc859bb20a29becd774baf7970"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessMessage (cognitive 80): LayoutController.ProcessMessage has cognitive complexity 80 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7495}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ac7e63860ac4edc6956b76b703e5804903b245989fc6537095b6411687e2bac"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ChangeTemplate.InitializeTemplate (cognitive 79): ChangeTemplate.InitializeTemplate has cognitive complexity 79 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d2fe56f170bb124a85899e11303d0be92af3aedfba8c7e10b942e442834399bd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditLayoutSettings.cmdUpdate_Click (cognitive 76): EditLayoutSettings.cmdUpdate_Click has cognitive complexity 76 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":824}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22ea7df86944c359ebb4a42cc7ae228e5d887f12f1d8845aac2ba8ada6e2f0d3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ApproveReviews.cmdApprove_Click (cognitive 70): ApproveReviews.cmdApprove_Click has cognitive complexity 70 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ApproveReviews.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":168}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffccc2e5e8c6916e8fb0e3778e1350812efba53fd725a5bce88b139a80313864"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.cmdUpdate_Click (cognitive 68): EditCustomField.cmdUpdate_Click has cognitive complexity 68 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":531}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5748c467759413eccf65096af16b0356f4e8f2b15a34e9078fcb624711c68a9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PdfRender.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 66): PdfRender.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"PdfRender.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fc0ea503903ce40f8bd897847dda738c916bd801b2c7458b20880dad859e4b50"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewProperty.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 66): ViewProperty.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 66 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cef15f96210e65faca99cb171b071db3b6e8c8a45860c2cbfb3244f7fecea87"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReviewForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 61): ReviewForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 61 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41d2f3d3db8211183fe7923db350d64555443e2154947abb92f2a9cae04e5f1e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.LoadStyleSheet (cognitive 59): LayoutController.LoadStyleSheet has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1358}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"393f8cd11c3eb4f1710e31d2caf8c09277e2b8682bae05f9f2925e755e0f569c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.LoadSettings (cognitive 59): LatestOptions.LoadSettings has cognitive complexity 59 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":558}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43b96114db8df646321200bf86d97885bd8310e90f35090111e6c7248998fd74"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.BindModules (cognitive 55): LatestOptions.BindModules has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"001a0b55babea2f4fec3acb304af7d07d339485d064440b30bd28c3c05849880"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmallOptions.BindModules (cognitive 55): SearchSmallOptions.BindModules has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cb1a47a71610f1af816b788000f7a2a8441240f015ff6ea5c5657d3e686d1fec"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypesOptions.BindModules (cognitive 55): TypesOptions.BindModules has cognitive complexity 55 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"TypesOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb1fd0182693b2e12d93e7159d72f311fd7ec03ba9493c2029d06f7cc6248b6d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_Default.ModuleActions.Get (cognitive 53): _Default.ModuleActions.Get has cognitive complexity 53 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":490}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6858090276f1ababd3231b2e2848a66260e9fcf45bc58dca3f75eafbf74b661f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewContactLog.BindContactLog (cognitive 52): ViewContactLog.BindContactLog has cognitive complexity 52 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewContactLog.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":16}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"de815da4152a1b025b10947e0e0630603ae7cd4ea735e2edaa182f1fcfb743b2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 51): CommentForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":511}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"af2739a687dd169e6664297c4eb32a69ed608dfabc833c8ed3b314900c07794c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.BindSearch (cognitive 51): SearchSmall.BindSearch has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3421a5b28e724a64d5c4c351ef9fc546ac1c5c852bade3992d20788f2bc01a1f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"jquery.lightbox-0.4.$.fn.lightBox (cognitive 51): jquery.lightbox-0.4.$.fn.lightBox has cognitive complexity 51 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 35 (40 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 3 (4 pts) (nesting depth added 6). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"JS/Lightbox/jquery.lightbox-0.4.js"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1033f677334180ff42bff6a05c1f677f914d6f908af77e9982ae398135decc86"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Page_Load (cognitive 48): EditProperty.Page_Load has cognitive complexity 48 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"993af237f24b302cf2b5f2c7e01afe1e46e0c76710cee1baecd74cc842bd8b4f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoStandard.cmdUploadPhoto_Click (cognitive 47): UploadPhotoStandard.cmdUploadPhoto_Click has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoStandard.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dd15f4255b38b7fff4ebfa552f3d0be5ef7fafaa3db462c5274d5450e93b762"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ReminderJob.SendReminders (cognitive 47): ReminderJob.SendReminders has cognitive complexity 47 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8725339b73188f92fa39c56e869616551285f2dd9967876ca4ebfaa6fb443982"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CommentForm.CommentFormFields.Get (cognitive 46): CommentForm.CommentFormFields.Get has cognitive complexity 46 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e7de617564630b849820ec6285d742192ea26806750b7187f81a817537449fd1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SWFUploader.CheckLimit (cognitive 45): SWFUploader.CheckLimit has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":63}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29d94f2e65d9eb8f0071b1c1e873cbb5f5241158b963508752fc0549bed8bd5f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetTypeLink (cognitive 45): LayoutController.GetTypeLink has cognitive complexity 45 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51c2611289531bce50d382630c09f0fe16f565538d07fe692c45755d764d2459"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmallOptions.LoadSettings (cognitive 42): SearchSmallOptions.LoadSettings has cognitive complexity 42 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"377561479c469f1809e087b0c60f551405eb4c131ce973a13a472e5bfbf07e03"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.cmdAddCustomField_Click (cognitive 39): LatestOptions.cmdAddCustomField_Click has cognitive complexity 39 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":427}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91e0ad27cc977e199c6b545d1d644f70743601c800ed9476753d656e5d3c39b6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.MailTo.Get (cognitive 37): ContactForm.MailTo.Get has cognitive complexity 37 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":93}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cdba1c3eb1872d2b80e444b9512327c3ea1e3f1bdc96b7eb6d38d6acef807d76"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CurrencyConverter.ConvertCurrency (cognitive 36): CurrencyConverter.ConvertCurrency has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CurrencyConverter.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22193615507c629808f8347ac70612d7e79104373b3a649de5670abefea2f681"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditLayoutSettings.BindSortBy (cognitive 36): EditLayoutSettings.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":218}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"756d1fea4f50b39cae0da463e001986c787345d4f6974ac65df577e684ee0e5e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 36): LayoutController.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3385}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f78270a8f340f6622a77abaccce80440e48787ca0eeec8d4cd58643d3fc12bc8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessPhoto (cognitive 36): LayoutController.ProcessPhoto has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7010}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51796c0f693bbbf0de45e608bbe7819f616969f5c46ac4cbf06194c7988cd2b5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 36): SearchSmall.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":315}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"411edc12c2ced6cc86c57914823b3de47c13f2e5fabe538af2993630dbf31438"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Types.ProcessHeaderFooter (cognitive 36): Types.ProcessHeaderFooter has cognitive complexity 36 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Types.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":118}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"945ac456fb23b6477f467115da8ee7e297f2f95cfb6054491d5172c4e0c59c7d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 35): EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":132}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7254dbf5692b2f6cd4ee955e4e5aa677b28359ae5a751400785b78fcd7bb5b0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SendToFriendForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 35): SendToFriendForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84e8c87eca0a01cef28528dc6444450d856593ed9865e80b263842aef6d96289"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Print.ManageStyleSheets (cognitive 35): Print.ManageStyleSheets has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Print.aspx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f00ee231790c010e8a47bdd519d2ec8e29aad55de6e48ef9f77ef81e7c6a40dc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetPropertyLink (cognitive 34): LayoutController.GetPropertyLink has cognitive complexity 34 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":376}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6bab7d71050df3463652e764811fcd50875ef7ecedd27922e9be0de05e387d2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPropertyTypes.BindPropertyTypes (cognitive 33): EditPropertyTypes.BindPropertyTypes has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":88}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f08f463bbae2152e79f7c0c19bd344a08419459985f9d79119dfe5b7e8edf0cd"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PropertyAgentBase.GetLimit (cognitive 32): PropertyAgentBase.GetLimit has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/PropertyAgentBase.vb"},"region":{"startLine":96}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f2573ca512fca6761b765d745cddcf5cd9707f75ea1fdb7a8115eba3887a2a89"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.GetLimit (cognitive 32): Latest.GetLimit has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32490c611c9e821b4cb21ae9a3d65fc319905b171e327330f83e0a6fa54eacff"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperties.BindSortBy (cognitive 31): EditProperties.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":160}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8691661c19058385e026810a1b37e9067cb3db3a306c04fbd69728e7a5bde574"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SWFUploader.ProcessRequest (cognitive 30): SWFUploader.ProcessRequest has cognitive complexity 30 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2011405cd34c79820a420caa45ff998849139f6913f04ab64dd348ac7acf942b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.BindDetails (cognitive 29): Search.BindDetails has cognitive complexity 29 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5bf6ea0b7fdb5fd33ab30a130e452ce42cb0bd8cfddfb7f32b6941648e06e91"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemCommand (cognitive 27): EditPropertyPhotos.dlPhotos_OnItemCommand has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":212}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c93cbf6f524f6bdcf7e993d6fe153cacc1f5c7ee2f6fe37a1234211bdc33d17c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomFields.grdCustomFields_ItemDataBound (cognitive 27): EditCustomFields.grdCustomFields_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":222}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa8410aa161c9849aaf0e4b2c67664d752a084f52fbb38e54f9939287ec3cf8c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomFields.grdCustomFields_ItemCommand (cognitive 27): EditCustomFields.grdCustomFields_ItemCommand has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":296}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fc7e39789c1185c98ca75cb6c36ca5fb7d83b519bafc1c687a24ca8a7567999"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.UpdateSettings (cognitive 27): LatestOptions.UpdateSettings has cognitive complexity 27 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":687}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e4e12a61584fcc891a2a001550d119d522617030073a096ed25c7644fdae971"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AgentController.AddUsersToList (cognitive 26): AgentController.AddUsersToList has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9fdbf1b786947458e0a3bf369b50a3ae5e127bcf7c28ca4f311812002106bec3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LatestOptions.BindSortBy (cognitive 26): LatestOptions.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28936a8c56a1cebcb02a5ed84b22a6bbb6de90a05cf5d854bd291933204acf88"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.GetAdditionalParams (cognitive 26): ViewType.GetAdditionalParams has cognitive complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1072}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"983cc44a9569665fd8637b49d258186150c6a2a9ee97bf74b1b294860eb37ddc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ContactForm.ContactFormFields.Get (cognitive 25): ContactForm.ContactFormFields.Get has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"04eb72122a78d681c306ddac3685c1aeee606fc0870587080cc0e260d2329089"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PagingControl.CreateURL (cognitive 25): PagingControl.CreateURL has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/WebControls/PagingControl.vb"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a5fc6af93ceb7fcd7c1420e60eeca786246440119b8c343f0d583967d36a1334"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.SiblingSearchProperties.Get (cognitive 25): LayoutController.SiblingSearchProperties.Get has cognitive complexity 25 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5357282d546677d82f8f0895c39b49ada569ff60cc645bbb164888af32c62803"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImportTemplateDefinition.ImportTemplate (cognitive 23): ImportTemplateDefinition.ImportTemplate has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":56}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad42da0ead5f024bd4681081465127f379307234410491b243b330ce0ab27c2b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.GetTypeLink (cognitive 23): LandingPage.GetTypeLink has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":325}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c06e6b48088f80532823ec8f4fca83eb5d851265c0d18284322c7041c5bc6c8"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Search.GetTypeLink (cognitive 23): Search.GetTypeLink has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"619416d4b30ab30acbd0a57e49fdc8727483aa9e55a01d6155a6b4fa06628b95"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.GetTypeLink (cognitive 23): SearchSmall.GetTypeLink has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36fe5f0ecfb949522053a93b97e59a7a9c3b4c9ef91ab869a1260eb00e315d84"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.dlProperty_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 23): ViewType.dlProperty_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (ViewType.rptProperty_OnItemDataBound) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1274}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07e7696f089c34ab234c7aef847cb085dc9c6ba30c3e96736b7bbeeb6ab83d86"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.rptProperty_OnItemDataBound (cognitive 23): ViewType.rptProperty_OnItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 23 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (ViewType.dlProperty_OnItemDataBound) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1329}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"755a916b4e6da72a40a2c2df48b689125f824619e8c476cbe90d189b219edf7f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"NotificationJob.SendReminders (cognitive 22): NotificationJob.SendReminders has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9c2b3da15d4c87dcbd121a635a29ad171c9a4409d35d296a3472d2268e9178e7"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Types.BindTypes (cognitive 22): Types.BindTypes has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Types.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"613dceba2f15ad383215cb20bf4a7b58d90a45b2fa737f046b95054297fdc702"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewContactLog.DataGrid1_ItemDataBound (cognitive 21): ViewContactLog.DataGrid1_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewContactLog.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":186}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ec5f533f9e748e94e3e9d466c01aa2fcfb8f05630866de285fb17e72d4b6c292"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PagingControl.BindPageNumbers (cognitive 21): PagingControl.BindPageNumbers has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/WebControls/PagingControl.vb"},"region":{"startLine":211}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0217c6ae43767bc24068f502b52df8bbd7003659e033d05ebf763d9622df90a4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"AgentController.FillUserInfo (cognitive 21): AgentController.FillUserInfo has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":217}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"26b5fcc2796c66b60179469cbebedeff87c35f22c17b05034e24e720ae2235ae"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.GetPhotoPath (cognitive 21): LayoutController.GetPhotoPath has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":872}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43fc31b213a602b5fe8a0012b24db288a823f4cef3864e1181108e8b576cc104"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmallOptions.UpdateSettings (cognitive 21): SearchSmallOptions.UpdateSettings has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":280}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"12596cca3e9b1ad4db4bc8863cadbc7f8f356cea3a59c5c74d85d4b77237b14f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypesOptions.UpdateSettings (cognitive 21): TypesOptions.UpdateSettings has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"TypesOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"811f94187434777d4a3825067d4b4979d5c9422b4c9858c7c9d7418cb9938120"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypesOptions.cmdAddAgent_Click (cognitive 21): TypesOptions.cmdAddAgent_Click has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"TypesOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":277}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2c5b89bc1f6ef3cfd29fc8039a7950b03a7f0c8e9003fa5e37a8df72a93ee5ee"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditContactField.cmdUpdate_Click (cognitive 20): EditContactField.cmdUpdate_Click has cognitive complexity 20 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebf0597c8dc57d2c23a97653fd0e94383d61b6300038454411971101e1fad58d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperties.BindProperties (cognitive 19): EditProperties.BindProperties has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":282}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1704e249f53a4fbd3740de48be43d9c99d6a389068d2e4649e39570368c3aba5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.cmdUpdate_Click (cognitive 19): EditProperty.cmdUpdate_Click has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1991}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee7d860d951acefa65df2bc94f24beed11bbdab38179caa8139bcdc795d38c62"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.cmdClone_Click (cognitive 19): EditProperty.cmdClone_Click has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2085}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e8bd6aa092f3050db08f0dc6891ac873bf72b40686b33c000ed23c266cfd6cc3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessRSSHeader (cognitive 19): LayoutController.ProcessRSSHeader has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1891b24b6492e153e37fc9fc24da6c6fdacac87aff8cee3598dd8129cd8e0b11"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"PropertyController.List (cognitive 19): PropertyController.List has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertyController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":111}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e4057664fe2bf851f4b47722f11d19d26308c0e67309eec708e3f94e7813c0e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageHandler.ProcessRequest (cognitive 19): ImageHandler.ProcessRequest has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandler.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":71}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf97a73ddbfc9ccb443775bfc0fe0826ec8c1ba01c3c04b7635d3232fd89c81f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoHTML5.GetImageByUrl (cognitive 18): UploadPhotoHTML5.GetImageByUrl has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":113}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2cbd51ec409fd5dca1a4f5ef02525abb37ee7db45b90106289bcf5bfcc8f32c5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.valFieldElementsFrom_ServerValidate (cognitive 18): EditCustomField.valFieldElementsFrom_ServerValidate has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (EditCustomField.valFieldElementsTo_ServerValidate) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":749}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42af2e0d58de3e5dd9e7fce6068dbc5141f6a794b013488c4ef246e5032db277"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditCustomField.valFieldElementsTo_ServerValidate (cognitive 18): EditCustomField.valFieldElementsTo_ServerValidate has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (EditCustomField.valFieldElementsFrom_ServerValidate) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":794}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbce46f30ae3a62c0aa9ef445270cea2eeefc5ca2d2a1d41e6f1c3af4988e7e3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditPermissions.grdPermissions_ItemDataBound (cognitive 18): EditPermissions.grdPermissions_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":433}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eaa3df0b9e6b72a5ab568d62a0bb032350f07ecb8faf25b62befb63957488fc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoHTML5.cmdAttachPhoto_Click (cognitive 17): UploadPhotoHTML5.cmdAttachPhoto_Click has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":40}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"146bec7d2054e59ea06744e760dcc86921245a6529cf47e92be25ade7479bb1b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoSWF.cmdAttachPhoto_Click (cognitive 17): UploadPhotoSWF.cmdAttachPhoto_Click has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":232}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6a2fb5e8a961d3d1d56722b9af4df80b78e78c261f17501cda34a38bdd3ca514"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"CurrencySelector.BindCurrency (cognitive 17): CurrencySelector.BindCurrency has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CurrencySelector.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":14}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f0b833f98fa9dd08dc1aa16ee796173aa6a4a2ca080629ea74a8a1e2994ac83e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditTemplateDefinition.BindDetails (cognitive 17): EditTemplateDefinition.BindDetails has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":68}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"152c61fb75f578075dfaf1900f4136e4050f2fabc163f5ae3b11a3a06f819ffc"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LandingPage.LayoutController.Get (cognitive 17): LandingPage.LayoutController.Get has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":60}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebd4ee9f181e63ea36b9ba2f4081c18360223f7dce0fbbc35f62ad24a5f17c53"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.dlLatest_ItemDataBound (cognitive 17): Latest.dlLatest_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Latest.rptLatest_ItemDataBound) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":859}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6e4b95f58424b27a39990d216aa48458ad7aee7b4fb5fd493547b22811d7bbb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.rptLatest_ItemDataBound (cognitive 17): Latest.rptLatest_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function. This shape REPEATS in the file: one other method here (Latest.dlLatest_ItemDataBound) has the same decision points, in the same order, at the same nesting depths \u2014 so this is one pattern written twice rather than two separate problems. Splitting this body alone leaves the other exactly as it is. Where these are variations on one operation, the change that clears both is the shared one: lift the common shape into a single routine the variants call, parameterised by whatever genuinely differs between them, and keep in each method only the part that is not shared."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":890}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b41ad0a55ebe96176969c234ce3a16bd31c365e98d7bedfb54e5845047e8238e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypesOptions.LoadSettings (cognitive 17): TypesOptions.LoadSettings has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"TypesOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":136}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f5a3596e4455ec6725cfd8cceb004188f9b87d1d438dfe6765b2bcf055cce0c2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TypesOptions.rptTypesFilter_ItemDataBound (cognitive 17): TypesOptions.rptTypesFilter_ItemDataBound has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"TypesOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":307}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cfa7966fe41603b2a17c9fac694bf481acb2846f09d77ec44a075ecafc9c8b12"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"UploadPhotoSWF.GetImageByUrl (cognitive 16): UploadPhotoSWF.GetImageByUrl has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0e023de3d70e10f3a0c546e79960b1a392882741b9ec6944da7d847ec7b89e5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ImageHandlerExt.ProcessRequest (cognitive 16): ImageHandlerExt.ProcessRequest has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3f7792fef27caa01b87a0fb3ea882caf9333a347ebe6775fd2239034529c9f3"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Xml.ReadQueryString (cognitive 16): Xml.ReadQueryString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Xml.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bcf769e49d595cda997e8aa749ff6517ce7d0fbff653e02d5fd9a60810a60f25"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.CheckSecurity (cognitive 16): EditProperty.CheckSecurity has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b9d33bb1b9bc2f815e3ce346ff27e12842ea64ce709d4a0439b9fce730ac8c47"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"EditProperty.Page_Initialization (cognitive 16): EditProperty.Page_Initialization has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17b74d846fd992fe05004e2b269ddb009fb03dcb566c18fbe6e84409ed1364a5"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LayoutController.ProcessExportHeader (cognitive 16): LayoutController.ProcessExportHeader has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1807}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9409dc433762eb89c0f28b0a8a8f033d62ebed993a1d3c57a0027d7d5e383e3f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Export.ReadQueryString (cognitive 16): Export.ReadQueryString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":84}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98541e5838da5625787395081b69ba607ed68b98db94684e2706d3d48d3ff12d"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Latest.ReadQueryStringTotal (cognitive 16): Latest.ReadQueryStringTotal has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":426}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cc55f1589ad973c93c794bb805f16621b04da46f80d47cc4d4fe28c4ac068b4"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Rss.ReadQueryString (cognitive 16): Rss.ReadQueryString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Rss.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6ef9731c059d1ac287567c1e687658f069e51591c54d212d2c575203bc2ff007"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmall.drpPropertyBrokersCustom_SelectedIndexChanged (cognitive 16): SearchSmall.drpPropertyBrokersCustom_SelectedIndexChanged has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3018}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8094779b5932cf59cdc4f2b2caa5bd89e7b12bfb4513a4dc5db08636fddb0ad6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SearchSmallOptions.BindSortBy (cognitive 16): SearchSmallOptions.BindSortBy has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"941b458dea4e9a22e945b399a14dcdfa1a5fbd78ef0f334c3849743333ea0d88"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.ReadQueryString (cognitive 16): ViewType.ReadQueryString has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":166}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"60393a55abc9fccd6b88f66f51cf9f688f3d8b18de246e362f2d0f4f399b1bcb"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ViewType.Page_Load (cognitive 16): ViewType.Page_Load has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, flatten the nesting: invert conditions into early returns or guard clauses so the happy path stays at one level, and lift the deepest nested block into its own named function."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1234}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5cfa8c9fb821d0d8668967bd352e0d892f1e1e70f6f7d09a6da363311c570e6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessItem: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessItem runs 2492 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 2392 over it, 24.92\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3429}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f88e72eb484138120229a49e8bba631ab1b9e13beb97c81418f2cdb66f959a46"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Layout/LayoutController.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 6034 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 5534 over it, 12.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"565f6eae80f38d26c181595aa1e866e645b0b8959355774a045eeded158c5b88"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessRSSItem: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessRSSItem runs 775 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 675 over it, 7.75\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f182e3cf76a5dc3f578e011d82d4a59ad769ce0378a0672d4f9f4f72237ae371"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Search.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 775 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 675 over it, 7.75\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":370}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70fb6df719a787624386f5ae5809aa1d3485fd0bd825bc686fe04fc982f2c674"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SearchSmall.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 721 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 621 over it, 7.21\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1792}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f905059006933d7e280c49fb2f10b20acc00ee782892cb46f1e52e8ec5239a68"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: SearchSmall: ClassTooLong \u2014 2571 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 19 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 2171 over it, 6.43\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bd95557e797406613eb98b17d05bfef803a035b0e25d3841c72c4ae3a48a9432"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LandingPage.RenderCustomField: MethodTooLong \u2014 RenderCustomField runs 621 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 521 over it, 6.21\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":910}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"548ed87c75187be40d83dba851e59acfd9c3de80596d2ae8f023e7d46cb500b1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SearchSmall.RenderCustomField: MethodTooLong \u2014 RenderCustomField runs 589 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 489 over it, 5.89\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":707}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7895876c393837ec9ff9815ebc46af9f4faae5a61d4a8ed435a5690604476b0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditProperty.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 549 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 449 over it, 5.49\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1298}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"731040b31fd9c8815f96a680b8441903df93cf848a7ebe58e781fa0e9dbd58b0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./SearchSmall.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 2579 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 2079 over it, 5.16\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcbd3f4ab2fbf1952ccf79036c8772bce8071c86ed0ffee746adedf8c487eced"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: PropertySettings: ClassTooLong \u2014 1933 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 1 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 1533 over it, 4.83\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertySettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8ff54b9f6adf2d45a202306165b38522da4e89136273abb6b11baedbfd12231"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: LandingPage: ClassTooLong \u2014 1731 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 25 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 1331 over it, 4.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b131c1b6050a2b5fe86d07105fe3a7e108f512ae7e2212fce7e51b40af6b9575"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EditProperty: ClassTooLong \u2014 1677 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 27 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 1277 over it, 4.19\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4af1fe222f7682cc85ee682455d4d3a8fe97cd5e42204ace8a7214c964e96e7c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditProperty.Update: MethodTooLong \u2014 Update runs 404 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 304 over it, 4.04\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":575}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"133becb28982cf45adf251970e90626462f9e8b71630f94311403d2256ac0376"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessOptionItem: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessOptionItem runs 401 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 301 over it, 4.01\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6524}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7964f6bbe742f7a8cc50d5c34b6b8e0500b9364a7de7d661825b819748c226b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Property/PropertySettings.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1939 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1439 over it, 3.88\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertySettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c63a947c23fd9101c6ef70d32e95b2459e76229f58b3d2fcbd1988877843e17e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./LandingPage.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1741 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1241 over it, 3.48\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b99dc25d790fa3d9ca1213fb299fc455fbe3ee7a4ddd6f505a08d6b6b627ea4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./EditProperty.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1692 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 1192 over it, 3.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca82177ea3d1c2f2a9a9dc67cced9363b57dd58d1cd7a03103a0397e7d97980b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: _Default.ReadQueryString: MethodTooLong \u2014 ReadQueryString runs 332 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 232 over it, 3.32\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3f8ef4da1e519f00c1e18eaa94f5b4a67ff08ef6bbbaca67ca492fdf96f1ea55"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditLayoutSettings.BindSettings: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindSettings runs 328 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 228 over it, 3.28\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":374}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d67e5a90a0007933ffd168fdcb27fe9d40cabed08b677187ce55a4c4d5ffce5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: Search: ClassTooLong \u2014 1269 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 13 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 869 over it, 3.17\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7c219720e6de601b99ae10e4a0e92ce60309584ad794c52c87e4bb88201795cf"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ViewType.ProcessHeaderFooter: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessHeaderFooter runs 301 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 201 over it, 3.01\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":725}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"54a990cc1867dac47c06693126f0c8569a0a059513a956fa9bbd15302b3bc979"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LandingPage.ProcessSearch: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessSearch runs 297 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 197 over it, 2.97\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":488}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4676d364f7baf9e8c75ef024bd22932f9b3adb84291a64ad20544edaeed72ff4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: ViewType: ClassTooLong \u2014 1109 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 24 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 709 over it, 2.77\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"70a12acb425737ec096881304c29535295fcd27478fd023e366a27e387d898ae"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SearchSmall.ProcessSearch: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessSearch runs 275 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 175 over it, 2.75\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":353}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"74560749834cbf4a11acb0e1f56f5498a14a5a10c0d7b7931deb485a214b9cd2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: SqlDataProvider: TooManyMethods \u2014 285 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 82 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 52 over it, 2.73\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Providers/DataProviders/SqlDataProvider/SqlDataProvider.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2705c346d7a2d9caf081e4c6a5b40ba26b65302c58dbcb614a24049f33511409"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditLayoutSettings.cmdUpdate_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdUpdate_Click runs 268 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 168 over it, 2.68\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":824}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ccaf44d211b4bc060961d693729c11c15a7023d6b8f029c63bd62ad30cfedab7"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessComment: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessComment runs 263 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 163 over it, 2.63\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1482}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"329d66c89dfac1a7ece563ad33531326e181494f4ae39cc1bf5a40ffb3d6b80c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./Search.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1277 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 777 over it, 2.55\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"221dad92fe51432da6dc689fbe96f585124331c5b527630b881e6ab4138db739"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SearchSmall.Search_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 Search_Click runs 247 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 147 over it, 2.47\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1502}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"086d28ea5d8b700c4653290fdf67552ecfdb79513d4d7c8a2d104186e58b012e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SearchSmall.cmdSearch_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdSearch_Click runs 246 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 146 over it, 2.46\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2714}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdd9f38845c50faa3d133d8e2fa47a61ffb791df06156ff1051b908249790963"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Search.cmdSearch_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdSearch_Click runs 237 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 137 over it, 2.37\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1292}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa8edea93452ba0ac041c7d6f283c25623a6a45dae973b29e00e7a181363877a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LandingPage.Search_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 Search_Click runs 236 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 136 over it, 2.36\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1718}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c38d5f56a10d67536db55de85cff6c9ce5d5e96041e812548e7d708f0585f820"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessExportItem: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessExportItem runs 231 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 131 over it, 2.31\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1836}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee66f2d5555778475e0fd558ab7063e9fd48837d01654b1fe21b03c1ac33beeb"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.GetFieldValue: MethodTooLong \u2014 GetFieldValue runs 228 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 128 over it, 2.28\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":466}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"50af8b03bc1c2a76789f4dcfea33a37408db5526dd45a841b9c36daed69d1a30"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditLayoutFiles.BindDetails: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindDetails runs 227 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 127 over it, 2.27\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":59}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e3d29fb21590cf01cab66269431868d10e60ea175827ca19d34e5dba8b008a35"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ViewType.BindProperty: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindProperty runs 226 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 126 over it, 2.26\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":422}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b0c5de1d85d6f0a8d5d4cd350b971de68c89867dfce88fa6bbeb7d53220a41dd"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditPermissions.cmdUpdate_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdUpdate_Click runs 224 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 124 over it, 2.24\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":151}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"454404b2f741203b7a103b729237f9042ece3a7ff4272e1f6e4a797cda9adf5d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./ViewType.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 1118 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 618 over it, 2.24\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8596f33b66c0c52dd94f0c54fe8d92d3d4bc92f2f26327e77988f23c5e1f24a0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CommentForm.cmdSubmit_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdSubmit_Click runs 208 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 108 over it, 2.08\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e604f892dab24c0ccb90796ec76621484c2a4c7b47313d6f87dee6d66e260c88"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditProperty.BindDetails: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindDetails runs 203 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 103 over it, 2.03\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":140}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"327cf80938b7ebda0cbbc49b5527483b1b5ae7b4bcaf867ca4af0054bd0a3312"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessType: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessType runs 203 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 103 over it, 2.03\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f094c444940aa0950caa05196ce38aba9fd2565fbacf5b6e90f9454256d1b015"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 999 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 499 over it, 2.00\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"58e9a504dc1342bdfaa643313fb2d22bd5520e44009ff082bc1b3a22835e4317"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ContactForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 194 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 94 over it, 1.94\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":423}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"07c3e0f45696bff4905382c3c3d353286d0f034c7612a45c6acb4fa82351caca"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: LayoutController: TooManyMethods \u2014 6010 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 56 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 26 over it, 1.87\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f0487d9d7ae9000cad18623a80e725adb300c0fe33fb320cd2b2344c859dd19"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.ProcessReview: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessReview runs 171 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 71 over it, 1.71\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2116}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c7685fc14952ee05ee9f1c8985b155f821563281874475e499204b436fd2cbfe"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: Latest: ClassTooLong \u2014 680 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 17 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 280 over it, 1.70\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4df2f9b40d49bbf138b1b53996671c7f66409b7e26a2b5d933941f6e967f5bae"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: Latest.BindLatest: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindLatest runs 168 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 68 over it, 1.68\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6284b5cd4195717d8135a367b0797fb21eb543eac97ec8267520e57039b4678b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EditCustomField: ClassTooLong \u2014 658 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 24 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 258 over it, 1.65\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9ce246f7ad1797c13350d7699f21a74d86ce3772f58a41df46fe10ba2223adb"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ChangeTemplate.InitializeTemplate: MethodTooLong \u2014 InitializeTemplate runs 162 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 62 over it, 1.62\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"059a6a4830a589208c9320e120c35b84871a72f7b9d6ac1fddadcbd8f91cbb41"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: Constants: ClassTooLong \u2014 642 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 0 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 242 over it, 1.61\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Constants.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b5371a057319d2c84ffc12a9f8e1878748fa82dce3843a49d1a515d015aefb0"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ViewProperty.BindProperty: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindProperty runs 155 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 55 over it, 1.55\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":152}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b04f98ae9d6d36dca61268c8cb0428d672c9a5b8e590fb01f2ebe27aaef84d9f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ContactForm.cmdSubmit_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdSubmit_Click runs 151 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 51 over it, 1.51\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":237}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"28b5d4ac569b8fdded5c59d482d7bd0a43ddedbd9aba31726b7a32e6cdc8a4b3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: LatestOptions: ClassTooLong \u2014 588 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 24 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 188 over it, 1.47\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d0ff06cfb291c8f71794ce2875f6c488f1e0203366f36dedf54c9a6546bdf1a5"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: UploadPhotoStandard.cmdUploadPhoto_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdUploadPhoto_Click runs 143 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 43 over it, 1.43\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoStandard.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fd666e81ad50ddfbb6c709baafe48e19053f2bdc1cce63281b5a162c1de18ece"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: NotificationJob.FormatTokens: MethodTooLong \u2014 FormatTokens runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":175}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"118ade93bce02d62d920e6aa1fdc0320e6b3a2e905f6a6aa7c79a5764d798faf"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ReminderJob.FormatTokens: MethodTooLong \u2014 FormatTokens runs 142 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.42\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":209}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5374b8b3ea905a5bde658a2e6a0a8e5facae4b7ecb0de3c53f7ef8114cfee317"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./Latest.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 689 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 189 over it, 1.38\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bf2ec2d3a774f71c11ee1cf048458bcee25df510f8de316a1a6a3f9c41437c9e"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditCustomField.AdjustFieldElements: MethodTooLong \u2014 AdjustFieldElements runs 136 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 36 over it, 1.36\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"018566809adca8c7aa3734c77e090bd9f6a676dbad63b88d1cbd718cbc695288"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./EditCustomField.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 665 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 165 over it, 1.33\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62c9e996fd977999fbf5322e308a7f8e67b8329b95d7b60ad8aa45db50b0b95b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ReviewForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 132 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 32 over it, 1.32\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":272}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e9d317c74067359bb644a8a5815b05a0e8248b176ce3d53c8be63c5ce5bf784"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Entities/Constants.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 645 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 145 over it, 1.29\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Constants.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea65a03f1fa9a04d044f73bdd0da76208272857832cf81160e9feac763610b69"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: ContactForm: ClassTooLong \u2014 512 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 6 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 112 over it, 1.28\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c524e8d64d64a0645ad40a90fc5660ba28433a27f13237dc3ae4f6ef7328a17"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: CommentForm: ClassTooLong \u2014 509 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 6 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 109 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eb4609d23a27338cb4532f14b378576c810d2f6d50d380fe0712449a22061ac1"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CommentForm.rptDetails_OnItemDataBound: MethodTooLong \u2014 rptDetails_OnItemDataBound runs 127 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 27 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":511}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"84768ada5e6df3eba59ae2e022d14239df8904bcb80bb8cb9626cd7529d34f8d"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: UploadPhotoHTML5: ClassTooLong \u2014 496 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 10 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 96 over it, 1.24\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4837c448999e873914c390947b099e1a38d4ade4f8977302047bfb9c0abe4262"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LayoutController.GetLayout: MethodTooLong \u2014 GetLayout runs 124 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 24 over it, 1.24\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53ba120e9fe6d5995c3f45058d12f60af4253d6dd1237d37c367591c477cf892"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ReviewForm.cmdSubmit_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdSubmit_Click runs 122 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.22\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5626a74e31a2da1de6f12309147d042767dd2445fd6904763d1d898093bfbdbd"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ReminderJob.SendReminders: MethodTooLong \u2014 SendReminders runs 121 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 21 over it, 1.21\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":53}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"02ffba2fa5d3086a784e12f9d698b0822a3b9a2831d34bd36c9fbb65de8e7ae3"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./LatestOptions.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 598 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 98 over it, 1.20\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ac96d56c42612b120e33f75b52efd2b6adbd41419bbc6b12075ed1247bcddce"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: ViewType.BindSortBy: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindSortBy runs 115 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 15 over it, 1.15\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":261}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"427b5f7487fb43913d3d30c85839095478402cd885e8a129a2679812bf4588fb"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EditPermissions: ClassTooLong \u2014 457 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 12 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 57 over it, 1.14\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"612c8f40be02fdf83491a66b684ba1bfdce4cb93fcd96f705ae0c1340c1845d9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditCustomField.cmdUpdate_Click: MethodTooLong \u2014 cmdUpdate_Click runs 113 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 13 over it, 1.13\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":531}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a7e7ff60890d3f762cccbff90481562daf9b07c90c8c0d4dbb862105b33c9437"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: EditCustomField.BindCustomField: MethodTooLong \u2014 BindCustomField runs 111 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 11 over it, 1.11\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e580a579e57e4bc6a82974531d1456b533dacfc86aeeba9c5c5ef3f7291e4e4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: PropertyInfo: ClassTooLong \u2014 442 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 7 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 42 over it, 1.11\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertyInfo.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7066759f498791ba1742ef51a1b1b6847bfd06e54992977e3f5775c1badc88f2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: CurrencyConverter.ConvertCurrency: MethodTooLong \u2014 ConvertCurrency runs 110 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 10 over it, 1.10\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CurrencyConverter.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":42}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44aba967ae52af9f086a9a68d9ad4b6927e7ae5f7c0fd16ec61faa01aa4823f9"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: _Default: ClassTooLong \u2014 437 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 5 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 37 over it, 1.09\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Default.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b171e7c92e7d95d527954e24d6c95f959a8806ced35337e1fb14a173ad468fb4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: EditLayoutSettings: TooManyMethods \u2014 991 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 32 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 2 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"954f1a6f797b8ca8f849b7b4dc84ae842f255bfc97922b557ea1671715b5957b"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"ClassTooLong: EditProperties: ClassTooLong \u2014 422 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded), 20 methods. The bar is 400 significant lines; this is 22 over it, 1.06\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51b40d475c2950db941de6b14e7d3c712dd0a4690395aa9e758022bed67f6b77"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: SWFUploader.ProcessRequest: MethodTooLong \u2014 ProcessRequest runs 105 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 5 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":150}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea08f0f8d13ed1d40d5b00ae6c52597b6a10e5911f863da2ffbb9f92e81588a4"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: LatestOptions.LoadSettings: MethodTooLong \u2014 LoadSettings runs 105 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 5 over it, 1.05\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":558}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83b655c6edf81662db8337dc432539416cf0655523cdd56854044a073b86dc0f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: PropertyController.GetModifiedSearchDocuments: MethodTooLong \u2014 GetModifiedSearchDocuments runs 104 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 4 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertyController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":221}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea20d6e11855fef68612d4b44c3043291d4cc0cf34d2d2a96b10d1adbb23acd6"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./CommentForm.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 518 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7e4dbcba398835d2b44d7cdecdff92b884b4662f1ba547656c31da20a1920d80"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: ./ContactForm.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 518 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 18 over it, 1.04\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6437af9e8750a51a947e28d3f76cd0503722299df825d60add2d5d8ee7ce3e49"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb: FileTooLong \u2014 515 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 15 over it, 1.03\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56e751235bd11d9b3cba00f932ea45a6e8c4f5d9c2f5d28ea936f5aa6b1c80f4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (232 shared lines): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1720-1977 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1504-1764 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 232 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1720}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"41e48b62fe56aba0b3c5984adf9a850d1dd300f956a1b992502bf0f0628390d6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Near-duplicate member pair (45 shared lines): ContactForm.ascx.vb:238-419 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:146-259 \u2014 These two members are variants of one another: 45 of their lines are already reported as duplicated blocks below, spread through both bodies rather than gathered into one. Read them as a single construct written twice. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared pipeline into one implementation the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (sync against async, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves the two bodies in place and the next edit still has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fe377533c399214d06d0c67f8d7ac42f8479c1bdac1db5dcfb011e1fa1d120f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Edited copy of a member (33 corresponding lines): SearchSmall.ascx.vb:317-349 | Types.ascx.vb:120-152 \u2014 These two members are one piece of code written twice and then edited apart: 33 consecutive lines correspond almost exactly, broken only by small local edits. Most of that correspondence is NOT reported as duplicated blocks below \u2014 the edits cut it into fragments and only the largest of them clear the block floor, so the rows below understate it. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation into one the two call with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic (an extra return value, one transport against another), generate one from the other. Left alone, the next edit has to be made twice and the two will drift further apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":317}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4aa81f51355d84f1d4ec3f5553c032709bc4a670a72813bd3dff1bb9d3be177d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (26 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): AccessDenied.ascx.vb:20-48 | ApproveReviews.ascx.vb:15-43 | ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb:26-54 | EditBrokers.ascx.vb:29-57 | EditContactField.ascx.vb:76-113 | EditContactFields.ascx.vb:52-80 | EditCustomField.ascx.vb:36-73 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:52-80 | EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:14-42 | EditExpiryNotifications.ascx.vb:23-51 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:14-42 | EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:750-778 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:15-43 | EditProperties.ascx.vb:250-278 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:142-397 | EditPropertyNotifications.ascx.vb:23-51 | EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:38-75 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:56-84 | EditReviewField.ascx.vb:76-113 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:52-80 | EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:31-64 | EditTemplateDefinitions.ascx.vb:15-43 | ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:14-47 | ImportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:19-52 | ViewContactLog.ascx.vb:120-148 | ViewType.ascx.vb:424-703 \u2014 These 26 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 26 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 26 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AccessDenied.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":20}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fcfef4fb0cd3102668f6d6a633d9b5e1961caaaa2e0f93a48a2c1ff46b02199f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (6 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): Export.ascx.vb:86-133 | Latest.ascx.vb:428-485 | Latest.ascx.vb:624-645 | Rss.ascx.vb:76-123 | ViewType.ascx.vb:168-225 | Xml.ascx.vb:76-123 \u2014 These 6 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 6 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 6 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a12fd833d5e33244fca49c6a7c68ec328943f6be06aed8d46d4efb72be9f42fd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): EditContactFields.ascx.vb:224-249 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:224-292 | EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:1148-1179 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:297-336 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:224-249 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e160471ec99ed307f39f7a330db211980591813bdba9f234c3fab4d863c6b95b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (5 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): LandingPage.ascx.vb:61-87 | Latest.ascx.vb:861-886 | Latest.ascx.vb:892-917 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1276-1325 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1331-1380 \u2014 These 5 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 5 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 5 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9ebe2f5b289eb10a02ef0d8f8632beaebf95a92101e31b3672a12433e38e8a9f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:61-125 | EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:178-219 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:61-331 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:384-500 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13eee0c73ce02e9acc0e2429a5eb3cbc439ab4a29c4e1bd32000be7ab96cd06b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): EditProperties.ascx.vb:216-244 | Latest.ascx.vb:793-802 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:173-182 | ViewType.ascx.vb:394-418 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8e6ef24bdca022a4e7102f7ff4b1f7259769f9c1327975bfdb4cfed754e8a4c3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Members sharing a duplicated core (4 members, 50\u002B identical tokens): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:560-683 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:791-801 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:138-199 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:264-273 \u2014 These 4 members share a duplicated core: a run of at least 50 identical tokens appears in every one of them. That run is NOT broken out as duplicated-block rows below \u2014 it is what admitted this row, and the blocks below cover only the part of it that clears the block floor, so they understate the correspondence. Read the members as one construct written 4 times. The repair is at the members\u0027 grain \u2014 factor the shared implementation out once and have all of them call it with their differences as parameters or as an injected step, or, where the difference is systematic, generate them from one template. Extracting the individual blocks below is not the same fix: it leaves every body in place and the next edit still has to be made 4 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":560}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b2dcf65f878268b2db67c04b7f1b020dbd206e4d447aa3a2addbca92ac516317"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (80 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1898-1977 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1685-1764 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1898}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eaa748a3a3a355f7ea47656a37a24cc0155353249930e2b0ff304c3b96a9778"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (50 lines \u00D7 2): ViewType.ascx.vb:1276-1325 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1331-1380 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1276}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c48601f849a22c0b496fdf2b610e67b3aac3fdbdc1b6bd73687cc770f6dccff"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (49 lines \u00D7 2): Latest.ascx.vb:437-485 | ViewType.ascx.vb:177-225 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ViewType.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":437}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"89d7f69ad874986f7c6f2660d55b40a7c7e7a2ca091860a9af6d165a0f1d1ec4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (48 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1769-1816 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1556-1603 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1769}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f247b0cce8c5db9b81ad4b3453d13212fe282b14e92282e8d17901639b8eb0e2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (47 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1821-1867 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1608-1654 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1821}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea8cb54e129b09552a39673c4049bb78664eac25e412d934bfaaa99cf990b9e5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (23\u201345 lines \u00D7 3): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:227-249 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:282-306 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:335-379 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b8d88720b02ceda2c1decc78e59175c19c6ca34aec58d1c5a7bc6dcbb46123d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 3): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:66-108 | SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb:38-80 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:87-129 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"97eb1238e3715428ef1dc8c7daa27cd1125ec6a216184bc283cb9af0781fe491"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:774-816 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:826-868 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":774}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3f079f99b4b399cdd8b7273aca379a2ac83e60c1bae7e7e1b6b05b8926b95ad"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (43 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/PropertyAgentBase.vb:98-140 | Latest.ascx.vb:109-151 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/PropertyAgentBase.vb"},"region":{"startLine":98}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cab55fad5dafd23bf7f97a054478693272a144629ec78e45fb04ff5dda72788e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (34 lines \u00D7 2): Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb:57-90 | ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb:28-61 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":57}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7a395e805b504d7a1d870369a0c9cd9f45f736d7b35419b7293b979ebb370de9"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (33 lines \u00D7 3): Export.ascx.vb:95-127 | Rss.ascx.vb:85-117 | Xml.ascx.vb:85-117 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Rss.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"25d496fc70f3d0f91ac9f6fe6ec317c34091408b67c79509cb63c3a25538d91c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (32\u201333 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1727-1758 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1513-1545 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1727}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"aa32725c39909072fd77dc4352f56c86f385930edc62d00ce653777266fd5e7d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (29 lines \u00D7 3): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:3391-3419 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:321-349 | Types.ascx.vb:124-152 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":3391}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32631aba743177b95ef5b1fb856140a329e8c7e948721585129fef76d214bc9a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): EditExpiryNotifications.ascx.vb:87-111 | EditPropertyNotifications.ascx.vb:80-104 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditExpiryNotifications.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":87}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e387c1a21a824a6b5f9d036acf33465f7595c775d420495a919fadaaa85141dd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): EditCustomField.ascx.vb:766-790 | EditCustomField.ascx.vb:811-835 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":766}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ad324662a49b1a2756fbf25f1643280e768fafaa52e5464614134d33a44024f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (25 lines \u00D7 2): Latest.ascx.vb:861-885 | Latest.ascx.vb:892-916 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":861}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"86f10939c0714233092f28bf5f127f0b5393335bacf7004f6026960fe850d766"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (22 lines \u00D7 2): EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:326-347 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:370-391 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditCustomFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 62 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"699d3dd96ab43277d7beb47f2ac2944f68a90e6b16ef555fde06d25a5bb12e25"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (21 lines \u00D7 2): Search.ascx.vb:309-329 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:42-62 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 127 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb:62\u0060 calls \u0060Not\u0060, \u0060Request\u0060 and \u0060Search.ascx.vb:329\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":309}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"148d49a94a842df021e85418dc693cae1e082a6b4261f179fd7f584dd9ee9d96"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 5): Export.ascx.vb:86-105 | Latest.ascx.vb:428-447 | Rss.ascx.vb:76-95 | ViewType.ascx.vb:168-187 | Xml.ascx.vb:76-95 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 47 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":86}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2bccd6651f202b97d32514755a6697a9a5f37345f9d230a3fddd392c4d0461d4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 3): EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:34-53 | ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:17-36 | ImportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:22-41 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 55 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"575fbcbb4a4ec1464bcc60a256916d89cf2f8f1ad6a11a93a0e034878d5990d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (20 lines \u00D7 2): ContactForm.ascx.vb:390-409 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:234-253 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060ContactForm.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":390}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98284beba7c7d0508689e3d9af8e19395d34d3dd0e05bcf95dbd49ad3441101d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 3): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:251-270 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:304-322 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:365-383 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":251}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f7218c2c7d0d67acd90a636bb119e8618eaee36fbac5ad5eb309df566f37b12"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (19 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:440-458 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:7215-7233 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":440}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e2f94f67be009c5b7539a3383a24ac942465e82944232a303e910504462c6701"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 5): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:226-243 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:250-268 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:287-304 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:340-357 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:364-381 \u2014 all 5 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":226}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"631113319d879e7f991abc59afcbfbf53ff289d55adb2869e06f9cb636b07ac6"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 26): AccessDenied.ascx.vb:32-48 | ApproveReviews.ascx.vb:27-43 | ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb:38-54 | EditBrokers.ascx.vb:41-57 | EditContactField.ascx.vb:97-113 | EditContactFields.ascx.vb:64-80 | EditCustomField.ascx.vb:57-73 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:64-80 | EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:26-42 | EditExpiryNotifications.ascx.vb:35-51 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:26-42 | EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:762-778 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:27-43 | EditProperties.ascx.vb:262-278 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:378-394 | EditPropertyNotifications.ascx.vb:35-51 | EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:59-75 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:68-84 | EditReviewField.ascx.vb:97-113 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:64-80 | EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:48-64 | EditTemplateDefinitions.ascx.vb:27-43 | ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:31-47 | ImportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:36-52 | ViewContactLog.ascx.vb:132-148 | ViewType.ascx.vb:556-572 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060AccessDenied.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: 84% of the shorter file\u0027s lines also appear in the other, so this reads as one file having been copied from the other rather than as a helper waiting to be extracted. The 1 duplicated block(s) this scan matched between them are fragments of that copy, not the extent of it \u2014 treat the file pair as the unit. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"AccessDenied.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"105f114d13548fa306b21dab3749a8b3fcf267e8c4624f0e726a33bc0bc72cd0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 5): Export.ascx.vb:117-133 | Latest.ascx.vb:467-483 | Rss.ascx.vb:107-123 | ViewType.ascx.vb:207-223 | Xml.ascx.vb:107-123 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 47 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d168a83d6942ee85c37d271addc048f74922b1ba921db471e892ebef906df0f1"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14\u201317 lines \u00D7 3): Entities/AgentController.vb:36-52 | Entities/AgentController.vb:100-115 | Entities/AgentController.vb:142-155 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb20725a70ed9bf54b9e15962d8ee38a0075b6717716705246b3263ca04831da"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 3): LandingPage.ascx.vb:289-305 | Search.ascx.vb:219-235 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1424-1440 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":289}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3b396e8860547ed0492f831fd939d0cbe3560407fd108a733082b0bb5f9766d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16\u201317 lines \u00D7 3): LandingPage.ascx.vb:878-893 | Search.ascx.vb:305-321 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:38-54 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":878}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ef766bab27c5a3050db06d3687ff1d743836a46c81b357a2884074192dd09e3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:244-260 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:317-333 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditCustomFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 62 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":244}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"192ff164c54712301de82aa9e125767b554dd1c3f59f8d73db4b89e015932c40"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): ContactForm.ascx.vb:335-350 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:208-223 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060ContactForm.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5e694954f1def56f6ab2a62576e279d6130987ceb3a8bc42a80fc92c1f91947e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:310-325 | ViewType.ascx.vb:123-138 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":310}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4ad76966f72d54b994ab05942b700b5441c6f6fcdc766dc9129582823184ebd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Search.ascx.vb:85-100 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:144-160 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 127 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060Search.ascx.vb:84\u0060 calls \u0060List\u0060, \u0060ListAll\u0060, \u0060NullString\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb:143\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 3 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed3112ed06fcd5a4aa43964400d85887b424459eda0e4d5a75b52f7e38192913"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 8): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1859-1873 | LandingPage.ascx.vb:1885-1899 | LandingPage.ascx.vb:1923-1937 | LandingPage.ascx.vb:1943-1957 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1646-1660 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1672-1686 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1710-1724 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1730-1744 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1859}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63719c779cc600cba6edcbbc7a4d6733be74fce0dc3d88a604314d1c9e7f048c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): Rss.ascx.vb:133-147 | Xml.ascx.vb:133-147 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Rss.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Xml.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 9 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 125 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Rss.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a923e597cd01349c662a434aa618d9cf7942b26ce215a60af195deaa6a823847"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 3): EditProperty.ascx.vb:718-731 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:776-788 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:808-820 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":718}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f4a75bc26e9bcbdaa3b10d742be0d21c73b3358d29c11eac64aea6dbc931c7a5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:203-216 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:221-234 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":203}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7248a0f41c33d7f555215e61ab64d2510d3888c0f7fd5c28758e520002ea6f3b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/PropertyAgentBase.vb:79-92 | Latest.ascx.vb:90-103 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/PropertyAgentBase.vb"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fbde0fab1129fd8293f63fff7164a882856535046f96fd15a0aa544a8cd870b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:444-456 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:7219-7231 | Entities/WebControls/PagingControl.vb:282-294 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":444}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6a866e4cf9ae78e734f17494d433599acbcc25f006bf045d82bf269ea73c172"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 3): LandingPage.ascx.vb:67-79 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1299-1311 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1354-1366 \u2014 there are 3 copies across 2 file(s) \u2014 more copies than files, so at least one file holds the block twice. Extract it once into a single shared function every call site can reach and call it from all 3 sites; resolving a subset leaves the remainder to drift apart. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4fdaaef7336fa7909107ee0145af71e2c1b5e4c78638132500484c4ab9c49a5c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): EditContactField.ascx.vb:253-265 | EditReviewField.ascx.vb:221-233 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactField.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditReviewField.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":253}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c769e6251406441d5fc8cd87dbfcc4ce598c8cac6c5385b574dfe6b82a32968"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Social/Journal.vb:15-27 | Entities/Social/Journal.vb:47-59 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Social/Journal.vb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f6b5c70359580d53d01e4d062bd5c32fdf86d950afa4950704b2b85051bf4d7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): ImageHandler.ashx.vb:29-41 | ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb:80-92 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandler.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":29}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6deb5dedc90d0997c15f05e96842b5165987dd8a356235f3a8c75da3bbf6d42"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:103-115 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:139-151 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":103}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d7616ecb62e9d82ac634c8f681fb056c047150e73c6de5a2a11769f993459290"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:121-133 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:157-169 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e546f87cc42e7554c1a3e255d2f1edf6497318bf21e170b74ff902b8cc6c587"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:334-346 | ViewType.ascx.vb:147-159 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":334}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbbc116b16cac7274e992000eb56b86c5b4bd96a4aaf6479e1f1a592f972f92b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12\u201313 lines \u00D7 2): Latest.ascx.vb:46-57 | ViewType.ascx.vb:66-78 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ViewType.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"57d70f825a5e0aebbef94a77c47ad981b0cdf279a1a464c6460720d1490a48d8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): EditContactFields.ascx.vb:35-46 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:35-46 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditReviewFields.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 88 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fcf5e6735cf966076e4aca3e08e06732880a5137d3d184391868ba50250816a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:256-267 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:300-311 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87a577ff0d62d68f4087921dbee218352f7f507b20be808864da92994559882a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:946-958 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:760-771 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":946}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d8698ce68c57f2f8ae8071cad39bad714753b2cd8a5226f7748017b00780ee38"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 4): EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:31-41 | EditTemplateDefinitions.ascx.vb:15-25 | ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:14-24 | ImportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:19-29 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 55 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":31}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"208f4b31a72d241fcc2e5aa699c92a0adc0135c067fc377e36fff04ee7b77205"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): EditContactField.ascx.vb:76-86 | EditContactFields.ascx.vb:52-62 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce7af653d73f50698f6b1d61173b4d154d697f1ac588bb92c5f3e87ff9b1cf85"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): EditReviewField.ascx.vb:76-86 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:52-62 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditReviewField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ebfe7ee002af554108f0e6abd53a73e66357602c8eed45c7b303e10ef864ba9a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): EditCustomField.ascx.vb:36-46 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:52-62 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9b5c8635505c2e189ca7d6a9bfd876c8a8fddc67b6d14784e21cc6f3a78cf530"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:213-223 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:279-289 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":213}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"623e1bbd492e4d791e0685f07da90fa3e55d6775d21aed3bb2d2d90a302bd9ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:38-48 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:56-66 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPropertyType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":38}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8abf964c3cec6d49c83d4dec06c71b927b45d8bc01121950e295215d66aee45a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10\u201311 lines \u00D7 2): EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:229-238 | EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:275-285 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:274\u0060 calls \u0060Delete\u0060 and \u0060EditPropertyType.ascx.vb:228\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPropertyType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2e395c7cb9c522bae2f6aad1f1e8f389f3aa40c12ee3d4d7e360030a0298a5bd"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:1763-1773 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1542-1552 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1763}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e948002e459468b573e6885a1b6d2e138b106e5addc914cb7efcf297b43348bf"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 6): Export.ascx.vb:94-103 | Latest.ascx.vb:436-445 | Latest.ascx.vb:624-633 | Rss.ascx.vb:84-93 | ViewType.ascx.vb:176-185 | Xml.ascx.vb:84-93 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 47 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b270e8964aca25cc6e79c895c7fe5ae4eb9f1cc928e0c21c847aa75c0100de08"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb:144-153 | Latest.ascx.vb:196-205 | ViewProperty.ascx.vb:409-418 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51b3d9bea3d8bd3b924cd368add9cc401bdca29113f4300fe42c37295a3eb701"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): EditContactField.ascx.vb:254-263 | EditCustomField.ascx.vb:590-599 | EditReviewField.ascx.vb:222-231 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactField.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditReviewField.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8636eac2a1425892995c05aa2100fb42797ec8e91afb0b9222ea8d5e7935c32"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 3): EditProperties.ascx.vb:216-225 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:173-182 | ViewType.ascx.vb:394-403 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 3 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"36280fc641453d2d39c51f6ff466403288f32fe5ccb78f59b2800cd27706ec13"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb:177-186 | Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb:211-220 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb\u0060 and \u0060Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6e82ff652972dbabcf2911aab2918450e9dfc6e04d27030b872f44619446d36"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): EditCustomField.ascx.vb:349-358 | EditReviewField.ascx.vb:137-146 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditCustomField.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditReviewField.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 37 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditCustomField.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":349}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30793657ee07ba8f4b4b329b2a9e809f03b2517b949fc9153bf565f3e98c31d2"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (10 lines \u00D7 2): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:157-166 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:167-177 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":157}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d840c8d295a7b4cc250c6a9102cd6bd03044b0e2db7fe6a5a01aefac0957b0aa"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u20139 lines \u00D7 4): ContactForm.ascx.vb:254-262 | ContactForm.ascx.vb:395-402 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:159-167 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:239-246 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060ContactForm.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ContactForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":254}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f35115458d3177f8285bedde4472c4c81f2a16229e0f0bfba85d9a72de43e702"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 4): Latest.ascx.vb:875-883 | Latest.ascx.vb:906-914 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1303-1311 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1358-1366 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Latest.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ViewType.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 124 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Latest.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":875}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e4b1bc640814ff685453cd21356b64bab7ed7bdc38351655c830709499b181b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:689-697 | SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb:282-290 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:205-213 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":689}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d153268b9b0cd181e2e39934ed379412fce9ceccb76ff3dace22b0c425e860d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb:335-343 | Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb:402-410 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":335}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fa9d2b5b5d8f2372a5c5a617db54898403e5afe84cbb1b30bc3639c8bf07b514"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): EditProperties.ascx.vb:122-130 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:119-127 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":122}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffda69de66e99836f1fb0576a8289c56a7e67be6cbe7875c7472e70c3265998b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): EditProperties.ascx.vb:568-576 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:2173-2181 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":568}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e5fd3011fd56773ea5fdba107b2754e520af2e5b72f2d521a747469b8f35364b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): EditProperty.ascx.vb:791-800 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:823-831 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Read the line range as the matched WINDOW rather than a finished unit: at \u0060EditProperty.ascx.vb:791\u0060 it begins part-way through the construct above it, so those exact lines cannot be lifted as they stand \u2014 widen the region to the smallest complete statement or declaration that contains it, and extract that."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":791}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"077ea483efda31f111abbe48635c088714669cf37e2adaabc2f26c71cfce6744"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 2): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:197-205 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:73-81 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":197}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed11d34c80638a8a4d61692476daaca3edff26864d7cc755c17cc61050a7466a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): EditPermissions.ascx.vb:435-442 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:525-532 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:580-587 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":435}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fbbfaba10f042147001e0e625cc3970be900949a54de6c13dda1a888cf26afec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 3): EditProperty.ascx.vb:733-740 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:790-798 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:822-829 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":733}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a9d977df331b5e73f8265477b762a0d4976e4e0069458a5886d6ddeb442318c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb:238-246 | Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb:262-269 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/EditPropertyPhotos.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":238}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"98807bf3af3d5e963cf4a0b5ee424e26119bd3dac1290177bc70822ec0ec2041"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): LandingPage.ascx.vb:2036-2043 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:3023-3030 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 11 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 323 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2036}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d75d037194c8fc63daf1f107c24268e5e35809bec808d8b501659114004b661a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): Search.ascx.vb:326-333 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:63-70 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SearchSmall.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 7 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 127 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"156383813d987bd55440f627030693522061d4d83197b3b24200ada30a93e56b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 4): EditProperty.ascx.vb:733-739 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:756-762 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:790-797 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:822-828 \u2014 all 4 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":733}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"231b81f0e2a097c4f4c670d02c16c32278a58e00688ab2abf401df5d2a896a27"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb:117-123 | Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb:160-166 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb\u0060 and \u0060Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":117}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a4e538f0d46447ca022d35b6b7b9f398c775f5881c38cb2a63a9720380548ae"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:49-55 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:49-55 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":49}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fc7b186695c9c1c0a4647d7ffd7125bab53a04890863a333393b6158a2a19dc"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:897-903 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:743-749 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just before the matched lines, \u0060EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:893\u0060 calls \u0060UpdateModuleSetting\u0060, \u0060ToString\u0060 and \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb:741\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":897}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9d21116b396517787332fcaef2de4f76c2d4566814438947f6f40c8b7febab63"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): EditProperties.ascx.vb:294-300 | SearchSmallOptions.ascx.vb:304-310 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":294}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2497b379d3f361c5d2e7095ee95aedb55ddd06d767fe74fdee5587a0b432db42"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): ViewType.ascx.vb:604-610 | ViewType.ascx.vb:645-651 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":604}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d07882cbccab3fa3df16e01f1c3c01d8700beb4ded671754a5d61fa821dc574a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 5): EditContactFields.ascx.vb:224-229 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:224-229 | EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:1148-1153 | EditPropertyTypes.ascx.vb:297-302 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:224-229 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditCustomFields.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 30 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0a3807c3a2e34800772ce5c456621a4aa2fce4f1cd2db62ca62a4f382b3daa61"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 4): EditProperties.ascx.vb:216-221 | Latest.ascx.vb:793-798 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:173-178 | ViewType.ascx.vb:394-399 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from all 4 call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperties.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1c457f2ea7168f315f381d7ef631b50bd03117adaa922f36d5177576d28096b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 3): EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:64-69 | EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:180-185 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:386-391 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8c87e4e747abaa2402decadeeca24d0a51fa2fd768c855268b3075646bb0ce83"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb:55-61 | Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb:55-60 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb\u0060 and \u0060Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. Note that the copies do not run to the end of the range shown: their LAST lines are different code, not the same code under different names \u2014 the matched region ends inside that line. Extract the lines above it, and read the last line of each site separately."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc4d3269c2ea7a32db171ea11a42225bafc9877863a74fbbb7b632c1734a52f7"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:263-268 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:147-152 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":263}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32979d36e9c580825456fbb7be42563ca79790fe394316a89b1ebe98f026d70c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:997-1002 | Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb:1008-1013 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":997}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"211a19e9ef03c4319c09c684fd3f8e480191ccf2b3e152087d865c0ec2701943"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:659-664 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:175-180 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":659}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee045b54a0819b2d1cce055168228f93879de364479c47433bebe0d2c3275701"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:791-796 | TypesOptions.ascx.vb:264-269 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 73 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060LatestOptions.ascx.vb:797\u0060 calls \u0060ToInt32\u0060 and \u0060TypesOptions.ascx.vb:271\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 4 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":791}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1289d69007062439411f734265a1ca999570a52149cca350e82d9fd711fcbf7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): ViewType.ascx.vb:614-619 | ViewType.ascx.vb:654-659 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewType.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":614}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4804c1beecda611860f151c08ab618495183df20dc61e0a1a310361aa70568ec"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:61-65 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:61-65 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":61}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c941e10481d65044efa3e71cd066fbfbb6a53f15d59ef74edcd6d8f57643acd8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): LatestOptions.ascx.vb:661-665 | LatestOptions.ascx.vb:793-797 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LatestOptions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":661}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d02e2d20233981b2b4c158d3637018b809ce37b028d047166f107128ce342e04"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (46 lines \u00D7 2): EditContactFields.ascx.vb:255-300 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:255-300 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditReviewFields.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 88 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":255}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44b6608073d1e3706c74b86b4e54e2bbbc6eace9aa7adae7a0f6ceb427269f6a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 9): CommentForm.ascx.vb:198-204 | ContactForm.ascx.vb:184-190 | EditProperty.ascx.vb:73-79 | Export.ascx.vb:171-177 | PdfRender.ascx.vb:122-128 | ReviewForm.ascx.vb:45-51 | Rss.ascx.vb:156-162 | SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb:101-107 | Xml.ascx.vb:165-171 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060ContactForm.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060SendToFriendForm.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 52 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060PdfRender.ascx.vb:137\u0060 calls \u0060Page_Init\u0060 and \u0060Export.ascx.vb:185\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":198}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c841a6dbe4eee9dae00e46ad35cd762ec1ed6552057beb283edeaff1ec6c782b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): Controls/UploadPhotoStandard.ascx.vb:39-45 | PdfRender.ascx.vb:110-116 | ViewProperty.ascx.vb:59-65 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere all 3 call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made 3 times."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoStandard.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eef3c8cbeeb1eb7b3bc56a3f52eb8966ca85708c9be8a4e0993a2f8933f2966a"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 3): EditContactFields.ascx.vb:23-29 | EditCustomFields.ascx.vb:23-29 | EditReviewFields.ascx.vb:23-29 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditContactFields.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditCustomFields.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 3 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 30 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditContactFields.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2965da5fbbff9d17bc43126f4e2e06d12be92e45bcd0177b1c456f1e0be4e3f0"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb:35-50 | Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb:35-50 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb\u0060 and \u0060Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 40 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/NotificationJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8a0dadc30f7c2d55bbd914e933de52076667857696e501d50f21c307d47d8cb"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): ShortListForm.ascx.vb:21-28 | SubscribeForm.ascx.vb:19-26 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ShortListForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":21}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"81b2fd5940dcff4a6eb4c755aa0d984f76e9c71342ca2a585a36cb753d3ece5f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Export.ascx.vb:36-44 | Rss.ascx.vb:34-42 | Xml.ascx.vb:34-42 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Rss.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":36}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d55c9eadab920e14412829f8ad233872f9474d6a0c050ab5f0ae70580e5264b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (9 lines \u00D7 3): Export.ascx.vb:50-58 | Rss.ascx.vb:48-56 | Xml.ascx.vb:48-56 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Rss.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":50}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a4a935ccc448d24af6b71ad317b156b92a1fb53b2c8d2ea26e60d6eb875bf09"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 3): Export.ascx.vb:64-68 | Rss.ascx.vb:62-66 | Xml.ascx.vb:62-66 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060Export.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Rss.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 8 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 110 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Export.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":64}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3fc1517d1f7bf8c0f1dc0e07adeaed3ff39e88b523aff8e0f6603c8acb1593b4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (5 lines \u00D7 2): Entities/Property/PropertySettings.vb:480-484 | Entities/Property/PropertySettingsTypes.vb:154-158 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertySettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":480}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f115f25d6b54dfec533d1f517272067b9e67c31cc3e6f66b810fbf238c68ac39"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13 lines \u00D7 2): EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb:147-159 | EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb:353-365 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060EditLayoutFiles.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 5 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 48 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditEmailFiles.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":147}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6634f3fbc8d999864b2567555b2ae732bff7cc08d96f9c5086ae95dd0fac7252"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (12 lines \u00D7 2): EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb:809-820 | EditPermissions.ascx.vb:124-135 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditLayoutSettings.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":809}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"876d393c5a2e35f775adc91c8ae8407af6402204e39781330adf98825567dcc3"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:220-226 | ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb:116-122 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060ExportTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 55 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":220}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2d7bcccc0907e1c46a6828fd77d9179b99311bca3ecc605edd5c70eaf4060325"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 3): LandingPage.ascx.vb:311-321 | Search.ascx.vb:241-251 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:1446-1456 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4599e15bebd48ba735dfbb6235390b11505c3c88763ff45a86aed7b7eeab986b"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (36 lines \u00D7 3): LandingPage.ascx.vb:327-362 | Search.ascx.vb:257-292 | SearchSmall.ascx.vb:276-311 \u2014 before extracting anything, compare \u0060LandingPage.ascx.vb\u0060 and \u0060Search.ascx.vb\u0060 as WHOLE FILES: this scan already matched 4 separate duplicated blocks between them, totalling at least 81 lines, which is the signature of one file having been copied from the other rather than of a helper waiting to be extracted. If that is what happened, the fix is to keep one copy and have the other call it (or delete it), which resolves this row and its siblings together \u2014 extracting one helper per block leaves the fork in place."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":327}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0fb312027b4ab5602250fc36e0a46215d7ef85f6606273c865ed5f344a151e7f"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (7 lines \u00D7 2): ViewProperty.ascx.vb:387-393 | ViewType.ascx.vb:1158-1164 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ViewProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":387}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ed03dc273ebc11ba73e8072d91d2b701f43e717bf4520ad60fcd321af5b4f685"}},{"ruleId":"D5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Off the main sequence: Ventrian.PropertyAgent: Ventrian.PropertyAgent: abstractness 0.01, instability 0.00, distance 0.99 \u2014 zone of pain \u2014 concrete and depended on by 1 project(s), so it\u0027s rigid to change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e969ba7c14e77af8eb4629dfb8d1246c92766c7156c053cff601e30bec68580f"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: UploadPhotoHTML5 (LCOM4 4): UploadPhotoHTML5\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoHTML5.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":23}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fd44922d633091896d34e104f078980fdad725ac75bf663753bf7726cba5d3e"}},{"ruleId":"D8","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Coverage not measured \u2014 no coverage collector is wired up: Coverage NOT MEASURED: \u0060--collect:\u0022XPlat Code Coverage\u0022\u0060 names a data collector that ships in the \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 package, and this repository wires up none \u2014 no test project references it and no runsettings declares one. The absence of coverage here is therefore not evidence about the suite or about our analyzer environment: without a collector, \u0060--collect\u0060 produces nothing even from a suite that builds and passes. Add a \u0060coverlet.collector\u0060 PackageReference to the test project(s) (or commit the Cobertura/OpenCover/lcov report your CI produces) and real coverage will be measured. It is excluded from the score rather than counted as a near-zero defect."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"62e63e619c28f057e129f2997c965d32a457366a9ce18ca019ffb6bdfba85c99"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":318}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b1c09dd4de8f5b62dead14b0dc3ba4549629268d97c9f5c72cc8e233fbf5fef"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ChangeTemplate.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":326}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"377061380b8599ebef7d02af388bda5c55f1b658b2278875d23a167210c4e83a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":377}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99c86f50626354098667d229b66f1a82ceae205462f9a3df945d932b78c956a8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":412}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"963a9b7a7597a2cdab52e39cb616a7d7498e141e499200d1832ce7cf0cdc645e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":446}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b6f1e6c0a642fd6fd958196ceeb0077d0af7b970ac907ea29da5c68d2ba66550"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"CommentForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":631}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f4e51900ec2e775a779c776b507c72e8fd8413ad1212bf12b7fa6a69b904833"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/SWFUploader.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":320}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb088c5bed1e06edd7b0451c93fec85c53faf46a103ecee9b0c55d3f2b00cbdd"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Controls/UploadPhotoSWF.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":91}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ced708a3d36377362118e1eb188644c8190055721eb1caf3da38d867700d410"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditPermissions.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e04d19b2ab13b337189c2602d59d454e815cc5bb9deb674fc1c024583c9fb6d2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":738}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"697e4c8a53e73a53339bf4ab007b91b7bb098fea61e570d4bc41329368267d1f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":761}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a75a55e5f3203dbeb0ec7030dc2dc0cc0c7331799b36ca362414ce35bff5d42a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":796}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6b8069348ec81d1540f19f28f209595d4ed046fbbaab8c965b44cec167271d77"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":827}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7bb819620d8692ab57402fef8e7a7604436435554f302676811b043939f7fa9b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":883}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f693544ff1c2eedc34885b7e0c653c20ce6db8fefc0e15af34b525eb167cfba3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1710}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9c472e89eca2a792daea719e134588f13872a7821efa91e3ee56935d34b7cfc"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1721}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d66e6dac8e8622b4bc18b2b1d24c7e556df7b616ce6436f59d95aa4ab9e4803a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0f2d0759032665ce83e680bd6e2bd272ac7064e35ac289d1fc756cc3086e1a03"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditProperty.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2162}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"10326be9900c3f31898c8478a771f26e6fad1754265340690ec538d653cf37d6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"EditTemplateDefinition.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":240}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"85df7b02ec2b1bb5d883f49601ef3296f664741811c1ebc13581c46334d8e975"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":205}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1a217057104e69888d5ada9ca2f0d1f2f21bc8231b7ad5220d2ae5d401772e45"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":243}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56a27de419442a37ab232515c529f1f4ac2ec88d61e3528f4b2d2724a75372de"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":248}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"629f88955b08a373643ba55611114cdfdef68080b2b30297d04bd7b680923907"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":256}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"15b56abf1f400811f7df21c72253f91364569295fe9fe78dd1d41c8d872f9d66"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":260}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b4db312d4547956a6c2e4c8d4c07ac391a744cfd79a6ba00ec0d0c28af296af7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":266}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c702f315c325324df31076c9dcd77ab6a8171793ff517137397955d5a7415c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/CustomFields/CustomFieldInfo.vb"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f26a391aab7d963b28368d58068f4d90c8fce5f094975495ba4e2b430e6b8b78"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1337}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4266e7abb52678f16a29ff3b64cc15bb88c80eab55c292cca19ec737d175b7ff"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1351}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d97a4757fda74d61d9534c01548ea4c04c7866d270cc83bb5e14e4fc36538b6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":5418}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e148d9f44592581a2eb577c8b6a5ee30bfca2120747e18ad8745d6b180eb8723"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6360}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"980e5dc361859b6c608fb4dc6bed0592abda8cfe545141aed5f86aca8be9184b"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6471}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f06944df9c49c38e56ab6651806bc41ca7305da2874b0b01b1151dc82f7cbc0"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":6508}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"59d14c622defad91aef8c05bdca3d34654cbd29b0d306220dbe207151ef975d8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":7457}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c2ce24fd5ff90f91885a2386b87d18a748867fe2efbbf9fd58fe4356b83ed77e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/PropertyUtil.vb"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"da33436f44dc10421bc5d88771b195e3f30e1c4a1687c6a313f0d314af60a0ca"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Reminders/ReminderJob.vb"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6c60ae716f8b41eac9e2c98b26d25948c7111cb22112508b1706d0c6b9df44e"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":95}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"416d39daade1664c4d611e57a59e057eb7fc9ff978e4734c7da8a887add82278"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":102}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"017341d3e2bd89e3ba43c7d437607d2b04caa60aa73db148f48a5ef6e5da653a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ImageHandlerExt.ashx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":208}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"387985a1ee1262571ad0e171ffa5237893a04c65a3a9b30ad8a97893ed7e8bda"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":477}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5c600785d3c06178e398779f77f60fe7b4607fbb20555e6d4ea5b722f1576558"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1036}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6de336c544668d6195ca1a409ff4d0e3d5845ca1f49c042f9e410c818bbc5caa"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1041}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5f34b05015e4051a977c6033d6cf5201632e47890ff04146cb108fb61af7c8e5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1196}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1eb3d27617ead8abb47890df420c577152052698df0592b8ccf5e070700ca450"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1201}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"22c75a302c00d27a4420515b5ad9ae171c0edcee78584799727004f5eca0688a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"LandingPage.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1544}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"87b9e012a2f9b903e41826ed442c1f11e60b4f07993e2ed5bc66153f29f09afe"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":242}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63803d580f15697b9f7c9f034925a5b04f70914c6eac2e43b2426925b1dadd6f"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"ReviewForm.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":383}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"75387eb1e867d50fef61bfc5b0ab9765734f4b822f69b0ab92701d689ffaa1a1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":548}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3a2c361668fb6441b217b98563cc1610dda5ff7853aad74ef362ac52698d7342"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":553}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1814d156a8e855065a25fab13e3ca60d06075ab18a1f694fbc4ef7f41216acaf"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":704}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b33ff31d3f1543b2b7310c290973eff974311fabf43df54d39c400ae6c8735b8"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":709}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6d78f635a9cb8c5b03205eb04709622e259ea663b5fc96498892efae3002ff36"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":968}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9a8edc6ccb3a5a568fd1f8e411c3a9ab55914d16d17240f5339fc016c90fb753"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Search.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1163}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c51756ed4f38db7b4142fb39e99dd965db683532de80292677868b691fc39ca1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":833}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c1a7cada3418892751f1dad013da789d80acc81a084427a09a33ee8b44c592c3"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":838}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdcf3c34844dc67f2a5424d6473576260efcb101af43c979da2eb249a09e9292"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":993}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b6ac28e8605341474f72fbf58727b8d58be87ae5e1a7bee90df0f49e947b1e6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":998}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"24a6a8350fd704f409596ad370c5834116720808c6c334d2ebf32d897ebc3b99"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1308}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5d6f2bb4ec4861d6e88014be6c1a3319344f855336755c3f8aba3618fb1f22ab"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1953}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0ce0f9d47519503843956d63965faf2facdf09e3db7d9196ac9737cf68cf947a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1958}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2339a2e2700bda4cf1060500604bf8ed2cf27f67179db5adc8d2f4ac36b6d35a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2128}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6c0732f46abcbdcb1aae553df4a2457906f444b821fcd5902c426f3543effc86"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ee0bdcbb1b2ac3aa29174b50c94d4c7c15c5d1b6955384c14be480ab17deabe6"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"error","message":{"text":"EmptyCatchBlock: empty catch block \u2014 the error is discarded with nothing recorded, so a failure here leaves no trace anywhere. Narrow the catch to the exception you actually expect, record it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, or \u2014 where swallowing really is correct, as it often is on a teardown/dispose path where throwing would mask the original failure \u2014 write down WHY in a comment on the catch. The comment has to give the reason: a note that only restates the swallow (\u0022ignored\u0022, \u0022do nothing\u0022) is read as no explanation at all and leaves this row in place. Any of the three makes the decision reviewable; all three clear this row."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":2595}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e76bdf0739bb451288e215c4957645bedce1dd36b4e1d7cc1e521fff964dca8a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: \u0027TODO: optimize? \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060\u0027 REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":165}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0b1f8882a08bf2d2ce7d1187b42cc6e4382b8360bde284769d3996e31fd56e6c"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: \u0027TODO: understand why I have to tho this, for \u0022Membership.Approved\u0022 return the REAL value \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060\u0027 REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/AgentController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":169}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"78a6da63c292ea709dc6baba9a9a1702ab470c31e82e1034ae4676a77c6d0c01"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no installation or build instructions: No build/run instructions for the repository\u0027s Property Agent module. Add a short \u0027How to install\u0027 section covering cloning, restoring NuGet packages, and running the module locally."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1fa6bfcd5c6ae231d1b8ee99bced50b832d1f61cde9da6cbb533467b879a57db"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no usage examples: No examples of how to add or display a property in DotNetNuke. Add an example showing the Property Agent form and how to bind it to a car/boat/realestate model."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1355eb4e127a4bc9236772ce1c46f09510aa9286e7a06d1e47f308229df19049"}},{"ruleId":"D19","level":"note","message":{"text":"Documentation: no contributor guidance: No contribution guidance for developers. Include PR guidelines, CI setup, and a link to the wiki\u0027s \u0027Contributing\u0027 section."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"README.md"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"620f29787918fa3406ae55cb63eefa1b50410845435c4e47bda852816aaea084"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fb43d9bc8bfdc5c731272c6f2313fecdace695fabdd355f08f598d6a5fbb54da"},"properties":{"commitSha":"d99cc26aa9db80adbf1382f7ca5ae9cd6c45df5f"}},{"ruleId":"D28","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cdfd7beb31b791ae18dcb425e21eb157c842e7bbcd522cc330573c1a6538db1"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"909ee5ff33c603811ce303ee51449abbaafb21563795bba6e276b9e08fce46e6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"30f1016afc99c6bd4a14e09685eb8ac14162a2099e1465b346b3ced611016b5c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6806d1b47a87e29d35d05e4a67c82c46209d486fced9e8215548418d405afc57"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"485a7bf078c4f6d90ededbf0b873c96a9ce5cca2d04a52c57b9214e5fb034b1b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"53662ae6942a88aac3b11a88fd5b823d89c43c0bfc78e2bb4a0e4def9021c9d9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3627cfe02297f265bb90076056075fe096147fd8f95ac02a1df50d0cad48a0ec"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d45d531b4ec6842790574046fb7036ebe4288c8c3fb18d8faad770d84e3fef7c"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"99a5ae5198ea618383d32b9a399707a6d3041aacd4b146d82c2e953edd4788e9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e6bfc00eaa7b4d1f548cefed98ab822e39e64f51886d5bd2aeb21e6758424bc"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8ca092eb5282446815ff75598ae82b0d6d186fdee5b060e9b54481989ad78fad"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a9e7b9d1798a47c0c2060cd558acf2cdb8f7e8f2e8109d3931361f0a7fb86a00"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8bc9d702d25d2fe7c950b4c40f685234130ac879286556b109f8bac21426ee0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"56e175cb98058404261957c1f767a9fb191a84c451294a1e518850bdcc7c0011"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"187a2d79dca7ac56959aa69784570221189bfbbe68da7c897729ec9be95e328a"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ffed21379e46f74ac158a58d6e61f178c06cfaed67d8728cd5574191c6c45e80"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b5e9b870e5e8da6798b8b9075f29d94fa24e443a2647e59f656ba56d7178502"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b42a1b7c7eae23e8d28d211065c7ead599dc3201e5a597d2a6ff426c7bb3150"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ea90e8b2c3fdbf7cecd0e90a8a40adec2bccf28c73901d849d90917e416dae06"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7b25be81391f899aed8b75bf7016e3a726f04bf3f7f488f98bd280065c87df76"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b161b5941a347649d76d03cafad9a4763cec1ddd00e8ec77f2e900c0199ac23"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f8c8f3b6409f21e452594c5b00e211c953b5a66c34412256edc409b79adf5b74"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"405ec6b8bc457b76db4b4a95a70054218d120ccc860c9dcdd95b5347f6635a54"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7dfaa0e79e8721751a34b50387d4d4af4c9267ed977f744bca2185944007cec7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ca58393689802888d286f9af77324e99abf796e2dd84f6504294163901d7f407"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d3d24348bf785a6e192c16b207dd52d1984672af619da410daf6ded0202ad6d0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c6fdb706a43ec4f6abb036ed78e6322e51f6cc499b41aa08d4bbbd91fadd70c3"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c44e2f1f8eafadd12237ca57e4b0b1a99f7f88c1d6589dab0fce5392fd914d1d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a2b0dcc4d62b8a150f9e2de7e90e8faa02df29360541c6af3e2b340d5b087256"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-319","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Dormant codebase: 89 of 89 significant files have no living knowledge \u2014 the codebase as a whole is dormant, not 89 separate risks. Counted over 89 of the 157 production source files in this repository: the rest are under the ~2,400-byte size floor this dimension measures over. Re-engage owners or document before change."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4c69f1e54b7dd6fe9029dd02df6ba8f8145b789f2f18dbdaa086c40ded49dba6"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Layout/LayoutController.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"45beef32d021fbbb5aa5ce8d221ff1300697eda6a9c2cbac6d2ba83099625be8"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"SearchSmall.ascx.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"179ef8b4c5167bafb2bd3db6a6be33b54d3e3f17d884f37bfcd270622b2b9069"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Most significant orphaned file: One of the orphaned files carrying the most lost knowledge \u2014 ranked by size weighted by the file\u0027s role in the codebase, the same weighting behind the score above, so core code outranks equally large plumbing. A reasonable place to start a read-through before the aggregate risk above bites."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Entities/Property/PropertySettings.vb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c80dc3dcc6c3e72047f3298180ba4659c449de22f048aa42b2510c1a89523a99"}},{"ruleId":"AX5","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Appears unstructured (no recognised architecture): ~37.9k production LoC (179 types) across 2 project(s) / 10 namespace(s) with no recognised architectural style or layering \u2014 at this size, deliberate module boundaries would help. No DDD/clean/vertical-slice/CQRS/transaction-script organisation was detected \u2014 code is likely organised ad hoc, which makes change and onboarding harder as it grows."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf38333cec692da9187608fc8d12d547460b1d3964d6b4da78c9c51e859dd969"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Thin README: The root README is 32 words, against a bar of 120. Of the three newcomer-critical sections this check looks for by heading, it found no a build/run or getting-started section, no a testing section, no an architecture or project-map section. Sections are matched on HEADING text only, so material written under a heading this check does not recognise \u2014 or with no heading at all \u2014 is not seen and this row may understate what the document covers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fc8f78bec0b6b3daab9d9139ba49b687f61b54f8310b64c159df9616f47e38e"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"M3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No src/ separation: Production code isn\u0027t grouped under a src/ folder \u2014 it\u0027s mixed at the repository root with everything else the repository holds, so nothing marks which files are the product."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"fdf7f5b24e313364d10170a5c2542959902fe0d26ed70edef3eaa10ec5bcdb1d"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"No CI pipeline: No CI workflow found (.github/workflows, azure-pipelines.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, \u2026) \u2014 changes aren\u0027t gated by an automated build/test."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"44f01af96e50474fba2df84d95ddf4f7e1d34c29c307830b9efc9057daa6b670"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add a Roslyn security analyzer package referenced from the project (the analyzer packages do analyse VB.NET), plus gitleaks for committed secrets \u2014 CodeQL has no VB.NET extractor, so its csharp pack would extract nothing from this tree and then report it clean \u2014 this repository has no CI pipeline yet, so run it locally to clear the existing findings, then make it a step of the first workflow you add so a regression fails the build. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 0 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"P6","level":"note","message":{"text":"No changelog: No CHANGELOG/HISTORY/RELEASES file \u2014 what shipped when isn\u0027t easy to reconstruct for support or audit. (Versioning/tagging makes releases traceable, but a changelog records the what.)"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dda5aa5aed8cbb292c3ef2b733bc138f614293ae6426c85e98bf31ef330d9415"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Third-party script without Subresource Integrity: \u0060https://www.plaxo.com/ab_chooser/abc_comm.jsdyn\u0060 is executed by this page with no Subresource Integrity. Whoever can answer that request \u2014 the CDN, anyone who compromises it, anyone on the network path \u2014 runs arbitrary script in this page\u0027s origin, with its session. The URL also names no version, so it resolves to whatever that origin serves at fetch time \u2014 the executed bytes can change with nobody touching this repository. 5 such include(s) across the repository\u0027s markup."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"Includes/plaxo_cb.html"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5524d0bddef368cb393ea2a577471a2bb050c8f7f1485f055ea55db4a503890a"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-319","guid":"7af97476-9f0d-4458-9163-3d2043918a1a","name":"CWE-319","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-319"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"OS Command Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"OS Command Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cross-site Scripting (XSS)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"SQL Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"SQL Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Code Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Injection"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":30,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}