{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D9","name":"Test Distribution","shortDescription":{"text":"Test Distribution"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D9"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D16","name":"Bus Factor","shortDescription":{"text":"Bus Factor"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D16"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AX9","name":"CQS / query purity","shortDescription":{"text":"CQS / query purity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX9"},{"id":"AXB1","name":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime evidence locked \u2014 no reproducible boot"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB1"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF3","name":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Async \u0026 latency hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF3"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build (cyclomatic 28): _AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build has cyclomatic complexity 28 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0eeb36b9609e4784e9f119aff365c638665334a115b7608c4bbaac9b4f8bb7b5"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SettingsTile.build (cyclomatic 26): SettingsTile.build has cyclomatic complexity 26 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce8173fe21dc638a592bb585a24ff00fabf3d65b3c6d1231c6c988e92c122efd"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_SwitchPainter._paintLens (cyclomatic 24): _SwitchPainter._paintLens has cyclomatic complexity 24 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":542}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2536910d941baf908c08ce759c49ebbfc39ac3af1784d53876fe2695c413d710"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_FluentNavigationItemState.build (cyclomatic 22): _FluentNavigationItemState.build has cyclomatic complexity 22 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1473b0ffbbc52c760aab9ded1515f40e8267b09ef9eba02d06c6a31889345454"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"SettingsSection.build (cyclomatic 21): SettingsSection.build has cyclomatic complexity 21 (threshold 15). To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Where every arm is uniform \u2014 the same kind of value, with no behaviour of its own \u2014 a table keyed by the case is the shorter form; wherever the arms carry different data or different behaviour, keep them as cases, because collapsing those trades an explicit, reviewable set of cases for nothing."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3abd83b4e4b42ce68df75ee6360dd21ebad91a3b900a3778acb0f8f5704e19c9"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_MacosSidebarItemState.build (cyclomatic 19): _MacosSidebarItemState.build has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/macos_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"43930bd0f5ff7adf93c46f2e6522df91fd24ab4ce1eb2cb2ec3d4cc9b19027b6"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_FluentSettingsTileState._buildParts (cyclomatic 16): _FluentSettingsTileState._buildParts has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"870be2d974b55500f72c58d602171be5a11e043e2113c2c1f6f4153ef5d85c03"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IOSSettingsTileState.buildTileContent (cyclomatic 16): IOSSettingsTileState.buildTileContent has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, split the body: these branches sit side by side rather than nested inside one another, so extracting each one on its own would leave a function per branch. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1b49eea4bbf8f477a08b471e701621b0d6d3171ecf59b4e2e83f801b581642b6"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_SwitchPainter._paintLens (cognitive 33): _SwitchPainter._paintLens has cognitive complexity 33 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 13 (18 pts), loops 4 (8 pts), if/else 7 (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":542}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4f36ad9a8c4e7bef463dda65bcb930b863e7a9deec1a0731cb8f7216eb63a9ad"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build (cognitive 32): _AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build has cognitive complexity 32 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 19 (23 pts), boolean chains 5, if/else 4 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3dd73ecbfdb3f9f7714621460205654a7ef9d76660de6b353564eabca57bca2"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_FluentNavigationItemState.build (cognitive 21): _FluentNavigationItemState.build has cognitive complexity 21 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 10, boolean chains 8, if/else 3. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a988fec1360e0e88fbc223201fbd51f2cd834b6db5c9eaefb9adf94d575c16d1"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_FluentNavigationItemState._colors (cognitive 19): _FluentNavigationItemState._colors has cognitive complexity 19 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 11 (16 pts), if/else 3 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":311}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1f65ef48a747906c309d6173ed98411c38dd4647d2adc893e1fab8073ca1b83e"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_MacosSidebarItemState.build (cognitive 18): _MacosSidebarItemState.build has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 16, boolean chains 2. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/macos_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"596a7d23037c9ecd83dff7e32d74399d7afe14e0cf5054be26a53cb6f59fb984"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_MoveFocusAction._nearest (cognitive 18): _MoveFocusAction._nearest has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 9, if/else 3 (6 pts), ternaries 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/sidebar_keyboard.dart"},"region":{"startLine":125}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"057388ab704e8333a7e58f0d99c975ddf978d7e0699eaacd2aaa65002a3dd14b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_AdwaitaSettingsSwitchState.didUpdateWidget (cognitive 18): _AdwaitaSettingsSwitchState.didUpdateWidget has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 6 (10 pts), ternaries 3 (8 pts) (nesting depth added 9). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0e0050426320796388874ab6c29cd5700be99133392d7a9ae8c754776b2b4e0"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_AdwaitaSettingsTileState._buildRow (cognitive 18): _AdwaitaSettingsTileState._buildRow has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 7 (11 pts), if/else 5, boolean chains 1, loops 1 (nesting depth added 4). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e39460db392e39c96d5f5cf82b58e9c25144f7ed8fac684f98c7d53efe30dd7c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"IOSSettingsTileState.buildTileContent (cognitive 18): IOSSettingsTileState.buildTileContent has cognitive complexity 18 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 8 (10 pts), if/else 5, boolean chains 3 (nesting depth added 2). To reduce it, split the body: most of this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 checks laid out side by side rather than stacked \u2014 so group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function. Some of it IS depth: where a check sits inside another whose only job is to reach it, merge the two into one condition, and where an else follows a branch that already returns, drop the trailing else and let the rest of the body continue at one level."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"902ff4ac3583308ed16a3822ed8b5046e0c570d3312a8b69066d744663ec119f"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MaterialTileRow._buildTile (cognitive 17): MaterialTileRow._buildTile has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (8 pts), ternaries 8, boolean chains 1 (nesting depth added 1). To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/tile_material_row.dart"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fb8b0195f3443c02236881487c69bc567380beaf6e4e2137d6bebdda36941ac"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"_FluentSettingsTileState._buildParts (cognitive 16): _FluentSettingsTileState._buildParts has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 12, if/else 3, boolean chains 1. To reduce it, split the body: this score is breadth rather than depth \u2014 many checks laid out side by side rather than nested inside one another, so inverting conditions into early returns has nothing left to flatten. Group the statements between the checks into named steps and move each step into its own function, so the body reads as a short sequence of named stages."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc3db321ce950529d80714b1c964c8ecd9061b489fbb35695380f0b199946590"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: _SwitchPainter._paintLens: MethodTooLong \u2014 _paintLens runs 199 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 99 over it, 1.99\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":542}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"47c96cbd725b4f6f8061c362370742b1d28956899738ad7b1b87482a07fd9561"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: _SettingsSplitViewState: TooManyMethods \u2014 39 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 9 over it, 1.30\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/settings_split_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ab8062f7cc08d843de2f0263e55d38fc87658f3ca77363c437809ca36037696"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart: FileTooLong \u2014 593 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 93 over it, 1.19\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ff3ec8c5581df1d7a63a6a489e652442920eb6601930b7404ea94cce0038aa5f"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"MethodTooLong: _AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build: MethodTooLong \u2014 build runs 107 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded) in one body. The bar is 100 significant lines; this is 7 over it, 1.07\u00D7 the bar. This is length, not branching: a long straight-line body scores low on complexity and is still read whole to change any part of it, so the complexity numbers beside this row neither confirm nor excuse it. To reduce it, extract each cohesive step of the body \u2014 the runs of statements that work on the same values and would earn the same name \u2014 into its own named unit, and have this one call them in order."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5ac47fb7c0dd050e467069940b111b0d4095ed091d456eb725a28f048745e6b2"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"FileTooLong: split/fluent_split.dart: FileTooLong \u2014 530 significant lines (blank, comment-only and punctuation-only lines excluded). The bar is 500 significant lines; this is 30 over it, 1.06\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, split the file along the responsibilities already in it: move each cohesive group of declarations into its own sibling file in the same module or package, so no one file has to be read whole to change one of them."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"13d13afbbeb5c0923f56f43339d17819ae9830c3c34ea2a232242f96015a95b5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): example/lib/screens/gallery/windows_display_settings_screen.dart:192-208 | lib/src/split/fluent_page_header.dart:439-455 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/windows_display_settings_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":192}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c00061582b8b944464a743a4a89faeb1936e41aa83b3817ba7920c435852c113"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (15 lines \u00D7 2): lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart:26-40 | lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart:75-89 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":26}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d7f54f7306d01a2896793a8a0d7f0e4cf343a198c8123c9b301e36fdb6eb521"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 3): lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart:25-38 | lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart:48-61 | lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart:74-87 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":25}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c80c5dc1eabcb6e4683d23b708bb51f9b5ed2b899e98aff782822de96ae2ea4d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (13\u201314 lines \u00D7 2): lib/src/sections/platforms/android_settings_section.dart:34-47 | lib/src/sections/platforms/web_settings_section.dart:69-81 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/sections/platforms/android_settings_section.dart"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce9ee9c13c305c60d83a294fae31f05aaad631830aae1029994c159543bdae7e"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8\u201310 lines \u00D7 2): example/lib/screens/gallery/macos_notifications_screen.dart:167-176 | lib/src/split/macos_split.dart:521-528 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/macos_notifications_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":167}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e151a9fa2f1dc37c5cb13b037487f447ac21256def20a170eaf6ee3618bd201c"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (11 lines \u00D7 2): lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart:137-147 | lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_switch.dart:94-104 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/cupertino_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":137}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d6876a24c6aaa823aa0b3d8cbf35504c7fa6cbc4684a83bd3f73ae6c3d4dfd4"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart:112-119 | lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart:139-146 \u2014 the copies span different directories, so extracting a shared function means choosing where it lives: put it somewhere both call sites can already reach \u2014 a location they all depend on today, or a new shared one if there is none \u2014 and call it from each site; until then, every change has to be made twice."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":112}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"08a05977bb0f81d37874b45f1cc2a554db8cb83c523e66df6495c9fa41e1630d"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (18 lines \u00D7 2): example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart:133-150 | example/lib/screens/gallery/split_view_screen.dart:159-176 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":133}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"61f915197815db97eff4a8c920dbea2f20bf1d77130d5eb62b421023a4f802f5"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (14 lines \u00D7 2): example/lib/screens/gallery/android_notifications_screen.dart:45-59 | example/lib/screens/gallery/android_notifications_screen.dart:75-88 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/android_notifications_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":45}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cd964e00b82e6d023612cb04cf75e4688b88341fb9ffe50d3176a7cdb558f721"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _RenderBreadcrumb (LCOM4 7): _RenderBreadcrumb\u0027s methods fall into 7 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 7 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_page_header.dart"},"region":{"startLine":229}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2affbd444aa59fbd7d71e89c372aa487f0bf76240f51f47472838a0fd4885817"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _AdwaitaSidebarRowState (LCOM4 5): _AdwaitaSidebarRowState\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"df083895f42d40c33bc6a2b4ace27927264637d68c9ed7ecde7ea27fe46d0bcc"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _SettingsSplitViewState (LCOM4 5): _SettingsSplitViewState\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/settings_split_view.dart"},"region":{"startLine":216}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cf61fa424b8969afdb2eeeba245adc41a451583fccc4b8bc25e775108433d5ec"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: SettingsSwitchState (LCOM4 5): SettingsSwitchState\u0027s methods fall into 5 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 5 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/settings_switch_base.dart"},"region":{"startLine":39}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6fa5a496122087aa0fbd3bd1e1eac03ed23350344802bd8ad7b134d4147c2400"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _FluentNavigationItemState (LCOM4 4): _FluentNavigationItemState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e583b01b3033428bdd806b15ac20cbb392b64d2228f9aff081e6c47b2628d66e"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _AdwaitaSettingsSwitchState (LCOM4 4): _AdwaitaSettingsSwitchState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":134}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cbc6e6c01a81e04affc44279c8e110cbf8b38e6ef51a1d5143da07c38940390d"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _AdwaitaSettingsTileState (LCOM4 4): _AdwaitaSettingsTileState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e478f650c8d1c113e50e09121039b757f33b677936bef5a669431ab5bc3cd4fd"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _FluentSettingsSwitchState (LCOM4 4): _FluentSettingsSwitchState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":107}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc2e528e08d5e2396f06b00fd966cd9826e48d063647f2e75364189d8c374219"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _FluentSettingsTileState (LCOM4 4): _FluentSettingsTileState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":66}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"952eeb5b042fd269c81748d2b89b91147ca49ab8c5a7c907008cea32d13e2d95"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: _MacosSettingsSwitchState (LCOM4 4): _MacosSettingsSwitchState\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_switch.dart"},"region":{"startLine":177}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"93d590f4e014f3c0fe7f89f96c5d0495beccb5a6620571af6017a807596ad402"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart: lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart changed 22 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 22 in _FluentNavigationItemState.build at line 359. 11 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 11 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":359}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1ffcf52536b5d03936d9959e1f53c7e3e4e0ed6a12170a73bd8523f9a725cb11"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart: lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart changed 15 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 28 in _AdwaitaSidebarRowState.build at line 121. 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 9 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":121}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"65ab7e832270e94c61264ad334d7fb925607a4a5ceeaebfec64ead6a34276a8e"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart changed 15 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 26 in SettingsTile.build at line 172. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 10 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":172}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"cc647c6d447e70346d4ebc618e2411a7d11f1a2701aa4fe270ad03aa8c5851d9"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/split/macos_split.dart: lib/src/split/macos_split.dart changed 13 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 19 in _MacosSidebarItemState.build at line 207. 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 8 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/split/macos_split.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/macos_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":207}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"29187c772f4dafe1bbbcd2754191eb24945fdf67d73b242831b64cee750b7ec5"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart changed 14 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in IOSSettingsTileState.buildTileContent at line 271. 8 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/ios_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":271}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"846bd6fa4565d1cb2a952a53fbd73d65c99114e7d44b5043660b8aeb2e0cf2f5"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart: lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 21 in SettingsSection.build at line 46. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 7 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart"},"region":{"startLine":46}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d4cd1fb9936779a8847d38a3b4a848bcfd9b5d19e06b85b7446e918e90eb5168"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart changed 7 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in _AdwaitaSettingsTileState._buildRow at line 223. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 5 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/adwaita_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":223}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0cddeb5fc4c1665a959c97a908f814fba85403559fb2edb0e86303e462353053"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart changed 5 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in _FluentSettingsTileState._buildParts at line 241. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, and the other 3 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":241}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ead722fb3784858b4f93dd82ac07e20dbcc8fe128e936c5f906a71170eca1ec"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: lib/src/tiles/tile_material_row.dart: lib/src/tiles/tile_material_row.dart changed 4 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 15 in MaterialTileRow._buildTile at line 74. 1 of those changes was a fix/bug commit, and the other 3 changed it for other reasons \u2014 this file is under both repair and feature pressure. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/tile_material_row.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/tile_material_row.dart"},"region":{"startLine":74}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b3d67df61ae7a6364fdd15f133adf87945b5500f9ef8b6f70358724bcac0d7aa"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Hotspot: example/lib/screens/gallery/split_view_screen.dart: example/lib/screens/gallery/split_view_screen.dart changed 3 times in last 90 days, and the most complex body those changes touched has cyclomatic complexity 16 in _SplitViewScreenState.build at line 76. 2 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so the churn is repair rather than feature work. Before the next change lands here, make sure the area it touches is under test, then split that area out of the file so the following change is smaller than this one \u2014 a file this often edited pays the complexity back every time. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- example/lib/screens/gallery/split_view_screen.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/split_view_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":76}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"327f2aa015cb49bf31b19f8ea600d22aac1ced1f6284dc13169c7ab95ec165ef"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/src/tiles/platforms/android_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/android_settings_tile.dart changed 10 times in last 90 days and 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 1 (its worst body is AndroidSettingsTile.build at line 33), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(a11y): make every tile its own semantics node\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): give every switch the tile title as its semantics label\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): make disabled iOS, Android and web tiles ignore the keyboard\u201D; \u201Cfix(theme): make a forced brightness dark or light on Android and web\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/android_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/android_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce4e9c93c3d540b2733cfa0e387fc34d22fdc7b096d41fbd5122f4ec2a272ca1"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_tile.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days and 6 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 1 (its worst body is WebSettingsTile.build at line 10), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(a11y): make every tile its own semantics node\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): give every switch the tile title as its semantics label\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): make disabled iOS, Android and web tiles ignore the keyboard\u201D; \u201Cfix(theme): make a forced brightness dark or light on Android and web\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":10}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"099574fe9ed46b998e693b60cb3f58efd3f657d98484592f7381838a197fd393"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_tile.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_tile.dart changed 9 times in last 90 days and 5 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is _MacosSettingsTileState._buildContent at line 273), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(a11y): make every tile its own semantics node\u201D; \u201Cfix(macos): keep the button role of a disabled row with onPressed\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): give every switch the tile title as its semantics label\u201D; \u201Cfix: leave 30pt after a footer in the macOS style\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_tile.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_tile.dart"},"region":{"startLine":273}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bdacece031a8254bf32fe52bbd77bf0c550e772b21945b68f9edb34ec6973de6"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_menu_item.dart: lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_menu_item.dart changed 5 times in last 90 days and 4 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 10 (its worst body is WebSettingsMenuItem._buildTile at line 33), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(a11y): make every tile its own semantics node\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): give every switch the tile title as its semantics label\u201D; \u201Cfix(tiles): make disabled iOS, Android and web tiles ignore the keyboard\u201D; \u201Cfix(theme): make a forced brightness dark or light on Android and web\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_menu_item.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/tiles/platforms/web_settings_menu_item.dart"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b7a2c5497bb44e037b1c1dcc0125a2da93b31f941bc16cd009fb089f401e5f6a"}},{"ruleId":"D15","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Repeated repair: example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart: example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart changed 4 times in last 90 days and 3 of those changes were fix/bug commits, so repair is the majority of this file\u0027s churn. Its max cyclomatic complexity is 14 (its worst body is _ShowcaseScreenState._sections at line 154), UNDER the 15 threshold, so this is deliberately not filed as a churn \u00D7 complexity hotspot \u2014 the difficulty here is in the behaviour the file has to get right, not in its control flow, and refactoring it for complexity would be the wrong move. The repairs counted were: \u201Cfix(example): keep the Windows showcase avatar inside the rail item\u201D; \u201Cfix(example): size the showcase icons for the desktop sidebars\u201D; \u201Cfix(example): keep the showcase switch check visible on Android\u201D. Each one is a case this code did not handle. Before the next change lands here, check that every one of them is pinned by a test that fails without its fix; where the same area keeps coming back, the durable fix is usually at the interface that keeps being misused rather than at the line that was last corrected. Counted over 2026-07-10..2026-10-08, the 90 days ending at the analysed commit. Reproduce with \u0060git log --since=\u00272026-07-10 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --until=\u00272026-10-08 22:30:58 \u002B02:00\u0027 --full-history --no-merges -- example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart\u0060: merges are excluded because a merge re-states changes already counted at their own commits, and history is NOT path-simplified because a change that reached the file through a merged branch is still a change to it. That command counts raw commits and can read HIGHER than this row, which counts a cherry-picked re-land, and a revert together with the commit it undoes, once each \u2014 a difference of several commits on a file whose history was re-landed or reverted inside the window."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"example/lib/screens/gallery/showcase_screen.dart"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b70c5f8242812001585074bfd2ef766f72539f17c26c5735b5b345e960203ab8"}},{"ruleId":"D16","level":"note","message":{"text":"Off-boarding risk: anonymized user #1: If anonymized user #1 becomes unavailable, 7 significant file(s) lose their only recent owner: lib/src/list/settings_list.dart, lib/src/utils/theme_provider.dart, lib/src/utils/settings_theme.dart, lib/src/tiles/settings_tile.dart, lib/src/sections/settings_section.dart, lib/src/sections/platforms/web_settings_section.dart, lib/src/sections/platforms/ios_settings_section.dart. Pair on, review, or document these before any departure."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bad0c18180ba3dc4c4cdee60dca467fca54d201b8a376413e162519f647a7107"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"20974bddba7cb26cd7d7b507305748809137fbb9293aae86c7da42571441ff45"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"27793c75f50f72eec8604d095d98339028f51a4dc33084b8c9ae1597f8e4f382"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9afbcf7b2f0ae94885ef706c60551397e6e4c7e6e68df900ec2080a6ad0c0ab0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2ece9bb884fe23ce25888e33b5933246ab8ac5c7239038dc3d24ff1e658d8d6d"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2a2406b2923e578c36632a4807abe3b56263577a43b5b2f28b629f71a31d7bf7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bc2d86cc82f560029f39b7fb5150d8f70c976d6bac452ae25372daffdb929f0b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8333496116a57b8e5cbe672116c715d0032069a23185615db24d5d1f23238efe"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"63578001309c43283f502d9e0762e1ee65bbdb2febbfd3d0b9ae1e277f7d31c0"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-522","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-829","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A06:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D35","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Change coupling clique: adwaita_split.dart, fluent_split.dart, macos_split.dart: 3 files \u2014 \u0060lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart\u0060, \u0060lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart\u0060, \u0060lib/src/split/macos_split.dart\u0060 \u2014 all change together with no explicit dependency: a fully-connected co-change clique, not 3 separate couplings. They share one concern (thin parallel siblings over a common abstraction), so extract the shared part into ONE unit and the whole clique\u0027s coupling clears at once \u2014 you do not need to break each pair individually."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"688fc4d106da59c35c9041e8c83653305597dc8a10d0b957d2289bb8178dfe61"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4badd7b4c725bb9db8109e8d58c15333aab098bff78a35d7f7106c6be7a386a7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"09dd409fdd5024315746bccf0cb97587b013cc8cf3cf135418111d2ee971cdcf"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"P1","level":"note","message":{"text":"CI build step not evidenced: A CI pipeline exists but no build step was matched \u2014 changes may merge without the build ever running. A build step may be invoked directly as a command, or declared as a task that a runner named in the pipeline resolves."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"251015acef1a259fcc13b7c60660cc8917ccb3ae8056cb5165ae03312dd586e8"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add the Dart analyzer\u0027s security lints plus \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 1316 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060!tile.isSwitch \u0026\u0026 tile.onPressed != null\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart, lib/src/tiles/tile_semantics.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/adwaita_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":219}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"66da2c223ed16e5e84dae33c8da3aee45a97faf4e94efb5a888760d95327de55"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060event.kind == PointerDeviceKind.mouse \u0026\u0026 event.buttons != kPrimaryMouseButton\u0060 appears character-identically in 3 files \u2014 lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart, lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_switch.dart, lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":304}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"c0f3f5b947e83bd7ba76369f5e43e061dde5d66815b897a101fbc9ef116f3fa1"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060oldDelegate.color != color || oldDelegate.pointsLeft != pointsLeft\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/src/split/macos_split.dart, lib/src/tiles/platforms/macos_settings_tile.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/macos_split.dart"},"region":{"startLine":643}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"51ff2bfba3d58fedb60aca8ada6a116e26b926c6b00a9fc234c3cef15b69d309"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \u0060oldDelegate.color != color || oldDelegate.textDirection != textDirection\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/src/split/fluent_page_header.dart, lib/src/tiles/platforms/fluent_settings_tile.dart. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/src/split/fluent_page_header.dart"},"region":{"startLine":459}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d9774066798cea0faab00d1c9e2439e826b706df78ee0055d2a87cc19556a2f1"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-522","guid":"71fb233e-ce6a-ae57-9419-ef8373540b09","name":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficiently Protected Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/522.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-829","guid":"13c33925-97fb-5a5e-b40c-56d328b8a4d7","name":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere","shortDescription":{"text":"Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/829.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A06:2025","guid":"491554d7-b8e4-9652-91a9-53700dc92ece","name":"Insecure Design","shortDescription":{"text":"Insecure Design"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A06_2025-Insecure_Design/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-5","guid":"cc7f4610-8859-e654-9029-d5f97d992220","name":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient PBAC (Pipeline-Based Access Controls)"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-05-Insufficient-PBAC"},{"id":"CICD-SEC-6","guid":"f2ee2486-b260-2952-a41f-6b67fa713940","name":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Insufficient Credential Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-06-Insufficient-Credential-Hygiene"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":11,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}