{"$schema":"https://json.schemastore.org/sarif-2.1.0.json","version":"2.1.0","runs":[{"tool":{"driver":{"name":"codehealth","informationUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev","rules":[{"id":"D1","name":"Cyclomatic Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cyclomatic Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D1"},{"id":"D2","name":"Cognitive Complexity","shortDescription":{"text":"Cognitive Complexity"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D2"},{"id":"D3","name":"God Classes","shortDescription":{"text":"God Classes"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D3"},{"id":"D4","name":"Code Duplication","shortDescription":{"text":"Code Duplication"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D4"},{"id":"D6","name":"Cohesion (LCOM4)","shortDescription":{"text":"Cohesion (LCOM4)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D6"},{"id":"D12","name":"Dependency Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D12"},{"id":"D13","name":"Secret Scanning","shortDescription":{"text":"Secret Scanning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D13","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D14","name":"License Compliance","shortDescription":{"text":"License Compliance"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D14"},{"id":"D15","name":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots","shortDescription":{"text":"Churn \u00D7 Complexity Hotspots"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D15"},{"id":"D17","name":"Explicit Debt","shortDescription":{"text":"Explicit Debt"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D17"},{"id":"D19","name":"Documentation Quality","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation Quality"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D19"},{"id":"D21","name":"Naming Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Naming Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D21"},{"id":"D22","name":"Internal API Consistency","shortDescription":{"text":"Internal API Consistency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D22"},{"id":"D26","name":"Project Cohesion","shortDescription":{"text":"Project Cohesion"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D26"},{"id":"D28","name":"Secrets (history)","shortDescription":{"text":"Secrets (history)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D28","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-798","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-259","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A07:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-798","CWE-259"],"owasp":"A07:2025"}},{"id":"D29","name":"Static Analysis (SAST)","shortDescription":{"text":"Static Analysis (SAST)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D29","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-79","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-89","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-78","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-94","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-77","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A05:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-79","CWE-89","CWE-78","CWE-94","CWE-77"],"owasp":"A05:2025"}},{"id":"D30","name":"Dependency Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D30","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1395","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-937","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1395","CWE-937"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D31","name":"IaC \u0026 Container Security","shortDescription":{"text":"IaC \u0026 Container Security"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D31","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1032","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-732","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-16","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A02:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1032","CWE-732","CWE-16"],"owasp":"A02:2025"}},{"id":"D34","name":"Knowledge Freshness","shortDescription":{"text":"Knowledge Freshness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D34"},{"id":"D35","name":"Change Coupling","shortDescription":{"text":"Change Coupling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D35"},{"id":"D36","name":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing","shortDescription":{"text":"Supply-chain Provenance \u0026 Signing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D36","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"CWE-494","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-1357","CWE-494"],"owasp":"A03:2025"}},{"id":"D43","name":"Malicious Dependencies","shortDescription":{"text":"Malicious Dependencies"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D43","relationships":[{"target":{"id":"CWE-506","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},"kinds":["relevant"]},{"target":{"id":"A08:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},"kinds":["relevant"]}],"properties":{"cwe":["CWE-506"],"owasp":"A08:2025"}},{"id":"D44","name":"Platform End-of-Life","shortDescription":{"text":"Platform End-of-Life"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/D44"},{"id":"AX10","name":"Code composition","shortDescription":{"text":"Code composition"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX10"},{"id":"AX3","name":"Project dependency cycles","shortDescription":{"text":"Project dependency cycles"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX3"},{"id":"AX4","name":"Dependency direction","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency direction"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AX4"},{"id":"AXB2","name":"Runtime readiness","shortDescription":{"text":"Runtime readiness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/AXB2"},{"id":"ED5","name":"Idempotency","shortDescription":{"text":"Idempotency"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/ED5"},{"id":"GD1","name":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfinished \u0026 placeholder code"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/GD1"},{"id":"IC1","name":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs","shortDescription":{"text":"Incompleteness \u0026 stubs"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/IC1"},{"id":"M1","name":"Documentation (README)","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation (README)"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M1"},{"id":"M2","name":"Architecture documentation","shortDescription":{"text":"Architecture documentation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M2"},{"id":"M3","name":"Folder \u0026 project structure","shortDescription":{"text":"Folder \u0026 project structure"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M3"},{"id":"M4","name":"Documentation accuracy","shortDescription":{"text":"Documentation accuracy"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/M4"},{"id":"P1","name":"CI/CD gates","shortDescription":{"text":"CI/CD gates"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P1"},{"id":"P10","name":"Library API \u0026 versioning","shortDescription":{"text":"Library API \u0026 versioning"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P10"},{"id":"P12","name":"CI test-gate honesty","shortDescription":{"text":"CI test-gate honesty"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P12"},{"id":"P3","name":"Security \u0026 performance tooling","shortDescription":{"text":"Security \u0026 performance tooling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P3"},{"id":"P4","name":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback","shortDescription":{"text":"Deployment \u0026 Rollback"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P4"},{"id":"P6","name":"Release Hygiene","shortDescription":{"text":"Release Hygiene"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/P6"},{"id":"PF1","name":"Benchmark discipline","shortDescription":{"text":"Benchmark discipline"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/PF1"},{"id":"S1","name":"Web-Security Posture","shortDescription":{"text":"Web-Security Posture"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/S1"},{"id":"X1","name":"Async correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Async correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X1"},{"id":"X10","name":"Duplicated predicate","shortDescription":{"text":"Duplicated predicate"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X10"},{"id":"X12","name":"Unreachable branch","shortDescription":{"text":"Unreachable branch"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X12"},{"id":"X13","name":"Undrained process stream","shortDescription":{"text":"Undrained process stream"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X13"},{"id":"X14","name":"Bypassable address classification","shortDescription":{"text":"Bypassable address classification"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X14"},{"id":"X15","name":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader","shortDescription":{"text":"Unvalidated length from an untrusted reader"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X15"},{"id":"X16","name":"Unfloored truncation loop","shortDescription":{"text":"Unfloored truncation loop"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X16"},{"id":"X17","name":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document","shortDescription":{"text":"Uncapped recursion over a caller-supplied document"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X17"},{"id":"X18","name":"Disposal-pattern correctness","shortDescription":{"text":"Disposal-pattern correctness"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X18"},{"id":"X19","name":"Unrestored process-global state","shortDescription":{"text":"Unrestored process-global state"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X19"},{"id":"X20","name":"Mistyped argument guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Mistyped argument guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X20"},{"id":"X21","name":"Side-effecting pattern guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Side-effecting pattern guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X21"},{"id":"X22","name":"Contradicted release guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Contradicted release guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X22"},{"id":"X23","name":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation","shortDescription":{"text":"Unguarded diagnostic materialisation"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X23"},{"id":"X24","name":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped","shortDescription":{"text":"Document value interpolated into markup unescaped"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X24"},{"id":"X25","name":"Inert configuration knob","shortDescription":{"text":"Inert configuration knob"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X25"},{"id":"X26","name":"Unsynchronised callback handoff","shortDescription":{"text":"Unsynchronised callback handoff"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X26"},{"id":"X27","name":"Collection changed while being enumerated","shortDescription":{"text":"Collection changed while being enumerated"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X27"},{"id":"X28","name":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard","shortDescription":{"text":"Index access outside its own emptiness guard"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X28"},{"id":"X29","name":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element","shortDescription":{"text":"Per-element action decided by a fixed element"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X29"},{"id":"X3","name":"Exception handling","shortDescription":{"text":"Exception handling"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X3"},{"id":"X30","name":"Support guard that admits what it rejects","shortDescription":{"text":"Support guard that admits what it rejects"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X30"},{"id":"X32","name":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly","shortDescription":{"text":"Type resolved by simple name across every loaded assembly"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X32"},{"id":"X4","name":"Structured logging","shortDescription":{"text":"Structured logging"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X4"},{"id":"X5","name":"Nullable reference types","shortDescription":{"text":"Nullable reference types"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X5"},{"id":"X6","name":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing","shortDescription":{"text":"Hand-rolled structured-format parsing"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X6"},{"id":"X7","name":"Silent fallback defaults","shortDescription":{"text":"Silent fallback defaults"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X7"},{"id":"X9","name":"Subsumed condition operand","shortDescription":{"text":"Subsumed condition operand"},"helpUri":"https://codehealth.canine.dev/dimensions/X9"}]}},"results":[{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TransformationMatrix.multiply! (cyclomatic 35): TransformationMatrix.multiply! has cyclomatic complexity 35 (threshold 15). To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/transformation_matrix.rb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"42fac442747f352cdfaaca9eeab2ed803748efad8e1798c194c12f5a70c94183"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Buffer.prepare_regular_token (cyclomatic 31): Buffer.prepare_regular_token has cyclomatic complexity 31 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/buffer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":397}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23c69d5541ba1755dec5c8635f6deff1d07cbb6053ea2e5347c3faa34dd67492"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Depredict.png_depredict (cyclomatic 19): Depredict.png_depredict has cyclomatic complexity 19 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/filter/depredict.rb"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e23e646c83a51c39b9434c2857b124a75608f2639c56dcfa48bb82f6d51db7f2"}},{"ruleId":"D1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XRef.load_xref_table (cyclomatic 16): XRef.load_xref_table has cyclomatic complexity 16 (threshold 15). To reduce it, separate the cases: extract each independent branch into its own named function, and where the body has guards that only reject input, fold those into early returns at the top."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/xref.rb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c65b3d878b9386ef8a3a71de08b34004ed48173d76ed8d5c1e9159346a6300b"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Buffer.prepare_regular_token (cognitive 40): Buffer.prepare_regular_token has cognitive complexity 40 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 19 (34 pts), loops 1 (3 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (nesting depth added 17). The drivers above price the dispatch low by construction \u2014 a dispatch is charged once however many cases it lists, while each branch inside an arm is charged in full \u2014 so most of this count is what the case bodies hold, and the arms are where it can be reduced. To reduce it, keep the dispatch but shrink the arms: move each non-trivial case body into its own named function (or onto the value being matched) so the dispatch reads one line per case, and group related cases into a sub-dispatch. Keep every case explicit, and make the behaviour for cases you do not list a deliberate choice rather than an accident."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/buffer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":397}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1bab15d410b6086b223d55a59a80fa9bfd0affd1d0dde496b1ef5d16846dfcb9"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Depredict.png_depredict (cognitive 35): Depredict.png_depredict has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: ternaries 6 (19 pts), if/else 7 (11 pts), boolean chains 2, match/switch 1 (2 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 18). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/filter/depredict.rb"},"region":{"startLine":67}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1915931991d8073b00ce3e010346d0a3d59cd3f80fd3436a3d5aef7b81a597ef"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TransformationMatrix.multiply! (cognitive 35): TransformationMatrix.multiply! has cognitive complexity 35 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: boolean chains 28, if/else 7. To reduce it, name the conditions: bind each compound test to a well-named local or a small predicate function, so the body reads as a sequence of named decisions rather than a chain of operators."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/transformation_matrix.rb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83dde499dcc600ed6276757e70797d3ec9f7c14421599d646a917510c9f54440"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"XRef.load_xref_table (cognitive 22): XRef.load_xref_table has cognitive complexity 22 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 7 (14 pts), boolean chains 7, loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/xref.rb"},"region":{"startLine":144}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"1d722f85642c3d589f065d7ebe3a115f69af30fda72e0aa44c0e1de9d3f30a7c"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Buffer.prepare_inline_token (cognitive 17): Buffer.prepare_inline_token has cognitive complexity 17 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 10 (15 pts), match/switch 1, ternaries 1 (nesting depth added 5). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/buffer.rb"},"region":{"startLine":285}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"90c53d69d985f16bb2abf0289c1b3abae72049883fd7f6b836df96b3c1631529"}},{"ruleId":"D2","level":"warning","message":{"text":"LZW.decode (cognitive 16): LZW.decode has cognitive complexity 16 (threshold 15). Drivers by points: if/else 8 (15 pts), loops 1 (nesting depth added 7). To reduce it, split the body into named stages: move each independent step or branch into its own named function so the body reads as a short sequence of named calls rather than one long body."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/lzw.rb"},"region":{"startLine":101}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2b5c9c1cae27c8c70489f7e921b6cbd3550e2e9b6b7559c1c244b477decb083c"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: ObjectHash: TooManyMethods \u2014 45 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 15 over it, 1.50\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/object_hash.rb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bb61d0badb11cf2e3649cb2169ce3ed5e320761202853cdabd4d65cd45c1544a"}},{"ruleId":"D3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TooManyMethods: PageState: TooManyMethods \u2014 38 methods. The bar is 30 methods; this is 8 over it, 1.27\u00D7 the bar. To reduce it, group the members that share the same data into a smaller type of their own and delegate to it, so no single type carries every responsibility."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb"},"region":{"startLine":11}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"421eb33558208b59b94d797b13d31f3537865ec04015f47afcabe7d6505deb81"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (8 lines \u00D7 2): lib/pdf/reader/font.rb:171-178 | lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb:293-300 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/font.rb"},"region":{"startLine":171}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"432d123f4fcd4fd5e908a3a383525aa6a54c39593b3a312b981ff4a9e32245b8"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (17 lines \u00D7 2): lib/pdf/reader/aes_v2_security_handler.rb:34-50 | lib/pdf/reader/aes_v3_security_handler.rb:39-55 \u2014 the copies sit in sibling files of one directory, so a shared home is within easy reach: extract the block into a single shared function the call sites can all reach \u2014 a file they already depend on, or a new one alongside them \u2014 and call it from both call sites, so a change lands once. The matched lines also transfer control out of the body holding them, which cannot survive a move into a called unit unchanged: have the extracted unit return that decision and let each site act on it."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/aes_v2_security_handler.rb"},"region":{"startLine":34}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3b40e28a5561598604a1d9b4a4f0e9e3a9a48906f10976ca61de9a5efa05f423"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (16 lines \u00D7 3): examples/extract_images.rb:73-88 | examples/extract_images.rb:104-119 | examples/extract_images.rb:134-149 \u2014 all 3 copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from every one of those sites \u2014 resolving only two of them leaves the rest to drift apart the first time one is edited. \u2605 These copies have DRIFTED, and that is worth reading before extracting anything: just after the matched lines, \u0060examples/extract_images.rb:89\u0060 calls \u0060call\u0060 and \u0060examples/extract_images.rb:120\u0060 does not \u2014 after which the two agree again for 2 more lines. One of those two behaviours is the intended one and the other is what a copy-paste left behind, so decide which BEFORE unifying them: extracting the shared part will silently settle it, and if the copy that skips the call is the wrong one, that bug is already live."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/extract_images.rb"},"region":{"startLine":73}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"2867225c997d97c5c9d6c971c8e0e21ca7d224454c5413d91e585f309a3ebc17"}},{"ruleId":"D4","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Duplicated block (6 lines \u00D7 2): examples/extract_images.rb:90-95 | examples/extract_images.rb:121-126 \u2014 both copies are in the same file, so extract the block into one function there and call it from each site \u2014 the copies drift apart the first time only one of them is edited."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"examples/extract_images.rb"},"region":{"startLine":90}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eba9d9f85de9e7f2e2751f69521dc94cdd5f2707cb97662c751fd254562fddb2"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: ObjectHash (LCOM4 10): ObjectHash\u0027s methods fall into 10 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 10 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/object_hash.rb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6f650070937eb3f6384e32c36a9621f4b2404911d7dfaad87cf58a5d8676d397"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: Encoding (LCOM4 4): Encoding\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/encoding.rb"},"region":{"startLine":33}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a6cf649111a04f409855a3c356de1d732f49555f2072612fd7668340b9d90b66"}},{"ruleId":"D6","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Low cohesion: PageLayout (LCOM4 4): PageLayout\u0027s methods fall into 4 groups that share no field and call none of each other, against a bar of more than 3 for this run (LCOM4, configurable \u2014 your repository\u0027s bar is the one quoted here). Each group is a set of methods reachable from one another through shared fields or direct calls, so 4 groups means the type has that many internally-connected clusters with nothing tying them together. Types whose shape makes a high count expected \u2014 and which would otherwise dominate this list \u2014 are excluded before this row is raised, so this is a genuine split candidate rather than a metric reading. It is still a shape, not a defect: confirm the groups match responsibilities you can name before splitting."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_layout.rb"},"region":{"startLine":15}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17a57e0c1c0aa1eef522f803a31795bac3d2cd817c7b9dbe8067fd4fbd4270d2"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: it might be worth adding an optimised path for vertical \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/transformation_matrix.rb"},"region":{"startLine":85}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"acf03c360f1c029b9b960eb2d423d0e41bca041e47860dfbf388498cde5e4337"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO record position changes in state here \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb"},"region":{"startLine":178}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bec37c4d09b09f123e8fcbf37fdcc09461f310362f0c82f05e6e87e71fca4c4a"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO print a deprecation warning \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb"},"region":{"startLine":227}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dcf1af4deb4196440f4f9419996873c491826cbdb3850edf945c2ac156f0c779"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO print a deprecation warning \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb"},"region":{"startLine":264}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a499a6816f478053db38833f21b52712cc9e6ac9ce9f745fc5a067d300b974f9"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO: support ty \u003E 0 \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/page_state.rb"},"region":{"startLine":391}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7d349c660b87d821eea4b2eadbbb6a75a2da29ce96fb9dbbdf996b5f28b7b578"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO update from O(n) to O(1) \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/object_hash.rb"},"region":{"startLine":450}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"934b688145f7516bddf90f19d40424e40958513970062e8c8c43094fc3a247e5"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO update from O(n) to O(1) \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/object_hash.rb"},"region":{"startLine":468}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3c7c62f549755a6f2c66b704f7fc633d5c8390a25c567f4455363e923a8664f7"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO change these to typed derefs \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/font_descriptor.rb"},"region":{"startLine":62}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"506a587d7e09d882d45517160561a4ef6766c651f5ad936abe4193b9990773a1"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO pass in a standard shape, always a Hash \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/font.rb"},"region":{"startLine":224}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"14071b0edd287960433d312debb64e8f04cb8641f4febbc1b9a4185a6215689d"}},{"ruleId":"D17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"TodoComment: # TODO this spec isn\u0027t ideal as our support for extracting rotated text is quite \u2014 source code is not a task system: move the work to your tracker and leave a reference instead (e.g. \u0060# REF: #123\u0060), so the task is planned where tasks live and the ticket links back to the code."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/integration_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1110}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e43d9004ff85a6d31275aa3f910d14406edbe799afbcee83b9c898bfd5ace75c"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent default value handling in \u0060fetch\u0060. While both use \u0060fetch\u0060, the semantics of \u0060local_default\u0060 in \u0060ObjectCache\u0060 vs \u0060ObjectHash\u0060 may differ (e.g., one might raise on missing, the other might use the default). More importantly, \u0060ObjectHash\u0060 also has \u0060[]\u0060 which might behave differently regarding missing keys compared to \u0060fetch\u0060. This creates confusion about the contract for missing keys across similar collection-like types.: Ensure \u0060fetch\u0060 behaves identically across all collection-like types (raising on missing if no default provided, returning default if provided). Consider unifying the interface to match standard Ruby Hash behavior strictly, or document the deviation clearly. If \u0060ObjectHash\u0060 is a specialized structure, ensure \u0060[]\u0060 and \u0060fetch\u0060 have predictable, documented differences. (signatures: PDF.Reader.ObjectCache.fetch(key, local_default) | PDF.Reader.ObjectHash.fetch(key, local_default))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7117822af48e9784f3690a080bd31c7e5faaf39947d2d762bc5e99997bcca7b8"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Redundant text extraction interfaces. \u0060Page.text\u0060 and \u0060Page.runs\u0060 provide high-level access to text content. \u0060PageTextReceiver\u0060 is a low-level receiver pattern that also has a \u0060runs\u0060 method. Users might be confused whether to use the direct \u0060Page\u0060 methods or construct a receiver. The \u0060runs\u0060 method exists on both the high-level \u0060Page\u0060 object and the low-level \u0060PageTextReceiver\u0060, suggesting overlapping intent for accessing text runs.: Clarify the separation of concerns. \u0060Page.text\u0060 and \u0060Page.runs\u0060 should be the primary public API for end-users. \u0060PageTextReceiver\u0060 should be an internal implementation detail or strictly for advanced customization. If \u0060PageTextReceiver.runs\u0060 is public, it should be clearly documented as a way to access runs during a walk, not as an alternative to \u0060Page.runs\u0060. (signatures: PDF.Reader.Page.text(opts) | PDF.Reader.Page.runs(opts) | PDF.Reader.PageTextReceiver.runs(opts))"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"7ae9727a6b5a8962e6ae8df7a12f31a44ce1e9dc45e8312a58b157fcbd43b7a9"}},{"ruleId":"D22","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Inconsistent naming for geometric dimensions. \u0060Rectangle\u0060 uses \u0060height()\u0060 and \u0060width()\u0060, while \u0060Page\u0060 also uses \u0060height()\u0060 and \u0060width()\u0060. This is consistent. However, \u0060Page\u0060 also has \u0060origin()\u0060, \u0060orientation()\u0060, and \u0060boxes()\u0060. The inconsistency lies in the fact that \u0060Rectangle\u0060 is a pure data structure with simple accessors, while \u0060Page\u0060 is a complex object. The real issue is that \u0060Page\u0060 exposes \u0060height()\u0060 and \u0060width()\u0060 which likely refer to the media box dimensions, but \u0060Rectangle\u0060 also has these. If \u0060Page\u0060\u0027s dimensions are derived from a \u0060Rectangle\u0060, the naming is consistent, but the intent (static dimensions vs. dynamic page properties) might be conflated. A more significant inconsistency is \u0060Page.boxes()\u0060 vs \u0060Page.rectangles()\u0060, which likely return similar geometric data.: Review \u0060Page.boxes()\u0060 and \u0060Page.rectangles()\u0060. If they return the same or overlapping sets of rectangles (e.g., media box, crop box), consolidate them into a single method like \u0060Page.bounding_boxes()\u0060 or \u0060Page.rectangles()\u0060 to avoid duplication. Ensure \u0060height()\u0060 and \u0060width()\u0060 on \u0060Page\u0060 clearly refer to the primary display dimensions and are not ambiguous with other potential box dimensions. (signatures: PDF.Reader.Rectangle.height() | PDF.Reader.Rectangle.width() | PDF.Reader.Page.height() | PDF.Reader.Page.width())"},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"17a40d821bf340eaf0188ca8464200ec049254e44dabf565b529e7bbb07d7202"}},{"ruleId":"D26","level":"note","message":{"text":"Projects may be oversized for their cohesion: 1 of 1 project(s) overshoot their size bounds, lowering Project Cohesion to 0.0/10. The most over is \u0060(repository root)\u0060 (8469 LoC, 164 module-visible types across 5 directories). Review these for cohesion \u2014 draw the boundary inside the module first (group each responsibility into its own package or directory and keep the cross-boundary members non-public), since splitting a published package moves types between packages and breaks consumers."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d5a94650dc74886a0f1f08eb9fb6775f1fc395279ef7e901c970c9d26f767a72"}},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3e835d46408022b586326cf8a2caa60c74cd628f8e82952bcd38d814ef67d575"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8cda30564a002890dff8349946f27a36e0006f6ab3430132d88031ffa41027f9"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"081c88bd1dc93f49c588aa77637753942e18ed010d24fb048a1defc0578fc757"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6c36b96637a906d57ee55c48519462d48c56889144a2e96a99c16514d580179"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"91ffa3d699b0bad6f6e1e85e37ec542ea8bcbba0654695b7fb80b406f2a68050"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ad472193b3b886390ac70c3f416ca4f901615f1e010eb23d890e24ffe0d723a7"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4e29c5813b8f781b9520b16df570caa532b320a3dc5829f63cfbd04c70cef516"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"23fd843193ab5695e77a52d2bbd3a66f5eb7c2c615b38aa984d4d27695583777"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0716eb172a723cc6b2ecf56414861b02bec91ac81765341afd3f4a7c353936db"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"3cf157466f607c9b4aa745573c5ef8f4f5557378bb61bd416a9f3c59b561ca9f"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"101b217ad101fe4bafd5735b81fbb271a62920c28e4f82574788929220eec4d8"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-328","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A04:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e0387984278597596e33e6742cf014e2d34987f1fb4b61e774a34f09ba01b64b"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1265","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D29","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"64197d30659fd50e6ee99e0c83cee3d50d4617a3c85d4e6999ebb0a202d5e9b6"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1265","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"error","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8d5f1dc663ecab32a01104a1eb7e95e05b806f43519e6e6425724a44d007479e"}},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"793f09b85bfba64cf39347d86218ccd008dae109690d5b9d8e4f2fd82e437203"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"CWE-353","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e907e9402ad75f7b5f89c1a65e7eb7b0b759f63d14492ae1b7b4cdd2c9c68194"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D31","level":"warning","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a3d6489f3ab2f7cd3fcc91b85eb09dde412b8d54a04aff7b820a71cccb055b67"},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1357","toolComponent":{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d"}},{"id":"A03:2025","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61"}},{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned files with no living knowledge: 2 of 37 analysed file(s) have no living knowledge left \u2014 their last meaningful change has decayed away, so if one breaks, no one currently understands it (counted over production source files of roughly 2,400 bytes or more, excluding vendored, generated and example/demo trees and test files identified by path convention, largest first; 37 of the 73 production source files in this repository met that bar). None is large enough to earn a read-through of its own, so this row stands in for the per-file rows rather than raising one each \u2014 most significant first: tools/fuzz.rb, lib/pdf/reader/advanced_text_run_filter.rb. Attach the read to the next change that touches one of them: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for, so the knowledge comes back at the cost of a change you were making anyway."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ce861fd78f6935114d3a342cb90ad25870f984e1042954fcbbe27c0e23be3658"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"tools/fuzz.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a1f7fe4b2e8a834fc21ab1787097a5428eb062560462a819526a16c694f75452"}},{"ruleId":"D34","level":"note","message":{"text":"Orphaned file: No one still active in this repository holds living knowledge of this file: everyone who made a meaningful change to it has gone quiet, or what the current team did to it (moves, reformatting, log-level or import edits, renames) never needed understanding it. If it breaks, no one currently understands it. Attach the read to the next change that touches it: have a second person review that change, and leave behind a short comment or test recording what the file is for."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/advanced_text_run_filter.rb"},"region":{"startLine":1}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"b581bed3a381193af0966693574e50c7788d69aa6af6932f4954632ef6c8589f"}},{"ruleId":"D36","level":"note","message":{"text":"A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."},"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"ace515990e7ee0f17b5c17e44dd168a5bdecf90804a3a3dd845cf05540978013"},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","toolComponent":{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35"}}]},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/reader/font_descriptor_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":51}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"d6ca24bab2ff7a7393c64c97f0e343ce0ac7f4ccd0ba1c14558fd08e7a127c91"}},{"ruleId":"IC1","level":"note","message":{"text":"Disabled test: A test is skipped/ignored \u2014 coverage that looks present but never runs. Re-enable it or delete it so the green run means something."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"spec/reader/font_descriptor_spec.rb"},"region":{"startLine":55}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4115b314d901247a101fea2e90c04199645626745e58932be6ee318e0635c776"}},{"ruleId":"M1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"README may be stale: 22 code files changed in the last 6 months but the README was not touched \u2014 it may no longer reflect the system."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"e973e7a8d5d866995cbf78b120250fe7f132bf928812d48ca62e69aba11b9910"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No ADRs: No Architecture Decision Records found \u2014 no conventional ADR directory, no numbered \u0060NNNN-title\u0060 documents in any markup this check reads, and nothing ADR-shaped by content. Design rationale recorded elsewhere (a design-notes tree, a mailing list, pull-request discussion) is not visible to this check and is not re-findable per decision, so a future maintainer cannot ask why one choice was made and get an answer."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"670b3d6e36a756d63097d0dfbf90afd5fc761308800b9354894a07c3f4e4aa14"}},{"ruleId":"M2","level":"note","message":{"text":"No architecture diagram/doc: No C4/Structurizr/PlantUML/Mermaid/Graphviz/D2 diagram, no drawn diagram named for the architecture, no file named \u0060architecture\u0060 or \u0060design\u0060 in any markup this check reads, and nothing in the README, docs or contributor guides that announces the shape \u2014 no \u0060## Architecture\u0060 heading, no \u0022architecture overview\u0022/\u0022high-level design\u0022 phrasing, no \u0022the architecture is \u2026\u0022 introduction, no guided code tour. A shape laid out in prose that never names itself as the architecture is not visible to this check, and neither is one kept outside the repository, so this row reports the absence of a re-findable shape document \u2014 not evidence that nobody wrote the shape down."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"0c190e7c159d1850ee706c3ac4486e151e8a4fe169de4bf61436b9f399654f06"}},{"ruleId":"P3","level":"note","message":{"text":"No SAST: No static application security testing detected. For this repository\u0027s stack, add brakeman for Rails apps, otherwise \u0060semgrep --config=auto\u0060 or CodeQL\u0027s ruby pack as a CI step. What was searched, so you can tell an absence from a miss: the 2537 CI workflow file(s) in this repository, and the scanner and linter configuration checked in beside them. A scan that runs outside CI, one configured in your forge\u0027s web UI rather than in a committed file, or a tool whose name is none of those this check carries, is not seen \u2014 if that is your case the row is wrong, and saying so is more useful than adding a second scanner."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"6e54424179c892f03ef2fd003130ac4bd43f39bbf3b1ca0a0143e25acb80ec87"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/aes_v2_security_handler.rb"},"region":{"startLine":65}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"83c4df4316417da7d51e9b56a303e9639fa5e6718ad9f47aaa69e99dfda9feb3"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/form_xobject.rb"},"region":{"startLine":94}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"bbed9088f96672cc81d63a6a49204d39ca61a96e3b9abc8e3851e8a02526a5cc"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/rc4_security_handler.rb"},"region":{"startLine":35}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"8f09aa245c0764ba2f75b6889d8a6e6ec007babbcd6e344dd97cd80beaaaae93"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/standard_key_builder.rb"},"region":{"startLine":97}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"f120199a396e493d2c167f872217c32e3941d68caef92569d0ac17ab35773509"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/standard_key_builder.rb"},"region":{"startLine":99}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"dd6c14504101de5f0d5683d3dc4ae0557fd86b520d107a8cfe5a3e9e78fa4553"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/standard_key_builder.rb"},"region":{"startLine":129}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"5fad23002e7f36aa5c7216937d08b41a29462089f1db98c0f37cd02780a1cdcb"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/standard_key_builder.rb"},"region":{"startLine":154}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"eaa4f270b63d240c47a737ca19a591c113c61c6a644f28acf7161ddddc2d032c"}},{"ruleId":"S1","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Weak hash algorithm: MD5/SHA1 is computed here, and both are collision-broken. If this digest protects anything \u2014 a signature, an integrity or tamper check, a credential, or any value an attacker can influence \u2014 that is a real weakness: use SHA-256\u002B (\u0060Digest::SHA256\u0060 or \u0060OpenSSL::Digest.new(\u0022SHA256\u0022)\u0060) for content integrity, or a KDF (bcrypt/Argon2/scrypt) for password storage. If it only derives a non-security identifier (a cache key, an avatar URL, an ETag), collision resistance carries no security consequence here; make that intent explicit instead \u2014 a non-cryptographic hash such as xxhash or murmurhash says it in code \u2014 since the algorithm alone cannot distinguish the two uses. Where a protocol this code does not own fixes the digest (a k-anonymity range query, a legacy signature format), the protocol decides; say so beside the call."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/standard_key_builder.rb"},"region":{"startLine":158}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"570b00b67839d607ac9422599ae43f15728ce8002f667fd88349db9bf95213d3"}},{"ruleId":"X10","level":"note","message":{"text":"Duplicated predicate: \[e-mail redacted]? || @font.widths.count == 0\u0060 appears character-identically in 2 files \u2014 lib/pdf/reader/width_calculator/true_type.rb, lib/pdf/reader/width_calculator/type_one_or_three.rb. It is one line, so the duplication detector\u0027s token window never sees it; the copies drift when only one is corrected. Give the condition a name and one home."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/width_calculator/true_type.rb"},"region":{"startLine":32}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"a000b4c41e12efbae9fd117d60160bbda3bef8a600382b27e6e62b4508df4234"}},{"ruleId":"X17","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Recursive walk over a caller-supplied document has no depth cap: \u0060obj_to_utf8\u0060 is public and takes \u0060obj\u0060 \u2014 which it walks as a \u0060Hash\u0060 \u2014 from its caller, and it calls itself at line 79 (\u0060self.obj_to_utf8\u0060) with a piece of \u0060obj\u0060 (and at line 83) \u2014 and nowhere in \u0060obj_to_utf8\u0060 is there a depth parameter, a descent counter, or any other cap. The walk therefore spends stack per LEVEL of the value it is handed, so the nesting of the caller\u0027s document \u2014 not this code \u2014 decides how deep the stack goes. A walk like this one raises \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 past about 3,800 levels on the main thread and about 1,000 on a \u0060Thread\u0060 \u2014 where Puma serves requests and Sidekiq runs jobs (MRI 3.3 and 4.0). \u0060JSON.parse\u0060 stops at 100 levels by default, but the other parsers a caller may use do not: \u0060YAML.safe_load\u0060 builds 1,400 levels from 2.8 KB, \u0060Oj.load\u0060 100,000, REXML 200,000, and \u0060JSON.load\u0060 on json 2.7 (Ruby 3.3\u0027s default) or \u0060JSON.parse(\u2026, max_nesting: false)\u0060 58,000. \u0060SystemStackError\u0060 is not a \u0060StandardError\u0060: a bare \u0060rescue\u0060 or \u0060rescue =\u003E e\u0060 around the call does not stop it. Thread a depth argument through \u0060obj_to_utf8\u0060 and reject the value past a fixed maximum, or rewrite the descent with an explicit stack."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/encoding_utils.rb"},"region":{"startLine":79}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"4b3f74fcb3b4a7582b44279d72d5cb82e3dc85b4ec22b0b705788934b361932d"}},{"ruleId":"X3","level":"warning","message":{"text":"Swallowed exception (caught, then discarded): \u0060rescue\u0060 takes every exception and records none of it \u2014 the body neither logs it, rethrows it, nor even names it, so the failure is discarded as completely as by an empty catch and only the substituted value survives. Log it through whatever this codebase already uses to report problems, narrow the catch to the exception this call can actually raise, or say in a comment on the catch why the failure genuinely cannot matter."},"locations":[{"physicalLocation":{"artifactLocation":{"uri":"lib/pdf/reader/object_hash.rb"},"region":{"startLine":83}}}],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"9e5d3da394b2928f7afe3ed24673b3aadabebf3d366d1eb9083b49e6ba5bc4a2"}},{"ruleId":"X5","level":"note","message":{"text":"Ruby\u0027s type checker does not check nil everywhere: 65/70 of this repository\u0027s Ruby product files are checked for nil \u2014 65 by Sorbet at \u0060# typed: true\u0060 or above, 0 under a Steepfile target\u0027s \u0060check\u0060 paths with diagnostics that make \u0060Ruby::NoMethod\u0060 an error. A file at \u0060# typed: false\u0060 (Sorbet\u0027s reading of a file with no sigil), \u0060ignore\u0060, outside Sorbet\u0027s input or under its \u0060--ignore\u0060, or Steep-checked only under \u0060lenient\u0060/\u0060silent\u0060, is one where \u0060user.name.upcase\u0060 on a nilable \u0060name\u0060 passes, and the first nil reaching it is a \u0060NoMethodError: undefined method \u0027upcase\u0027 for nil\u0060 in production."},"locations":[],"partialFingerprints":{"codehealthFindingId/v1":"32b27113b1bc22f400935e8620d19eae7fd3ef145cc36018609c445ea8cd4af1"}}],"taxonomies":[{"name":"CWE","guid":"c3a2b1d0-7f3e-4b2a-9c1d-5e6f7a8b9c0d","organization":"MITRE","informationUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)."},"taxa":[{"id":"CWE-1032","guid":"5f21e517-68aa-a650-9a25-5771ef024637","name":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category","shortDescription":{"text":"OWASP Top Ten \u2014 Security Misconfiguration category"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1032.html"},{"id":"CWE-1265","guid":"9bfc5711-f2f2-6252-bd2e-ff21a1e98a6c","name":"CWE-1265","shortDescription":{"text":"CWE-1265"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1265.html"},{"id":"CWE-1357","guid":"e4d2e772-757e-0a5c-bd7d-77052949d866","name":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1357.html"},{"id":"CWE-1395","guid":"800e09e7-c11a-8654-9fa6-86f398995fed","name":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html"},{"id":"CWE-16","guid":"659db3ea-affc-8453-8add-c1218fbfcb92","name":"Configuration","shortDescription":{"text":"Configuration"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html"},{"id":"CWE-259","guid":"ae9ad959-fbb6-9d5e-892d-3dca66da0b69","name":"Use of Hard-coded Password","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Password"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/259.html"},{"id":"CWE-328","guid":"f0ffc869-97c3-dc5c-8825-be1159f1fc5f","name":"Reversible One-Way Hash","shortDescription":{"text":"Reversible One-Way Hash"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/328.html"},{"id":"CWE-353","guid":"09d7e902-d4ee-f05d-ae6c-0a1554d0c18f","name":"Missing Support for Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Missing Support for Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/353.html"},{"id":"CWE-494","guid":"b8a65e0d-e459-4a55-a931-fc1136482375","name":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check","shortDescription":{"text":"Download of Code Without Integrity Check"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html"},{"id":"CWE-506","guid":"401d6455-56e3-0552-9a39-f77461673e3f","name":"Embedded Malicious Code","shortDescription":{"text":"Embedded Malicious Code"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/506.html"},{"id":"CWE-732","guid":"1da27e8f-b330-7650-ab63-bd61953eae5d","name":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource","shortDescription":{"text":"Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/732.html"},{"id":"CWE-77","guid":"332c8ade-6612-9f56-a06b-d8d90b1a8750","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/77.html"},{"id":"CWE-78","guid":"2e31ceaf-c7ae-2e5e-9661-cfb1362789cf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html"},{"id":"CWE-79","guid":"fd45580b-e8c4-fc5e-8c2f-aa8fab0b4dbf","name":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html"},{"id":"CWE-798","guid":"5e8f057d-fee3-995a-a0cb-9fc5b0d174d1","name":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials","shortDescription":{"text":"Use of Hard-coded Credentials"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html"},{"id":"CWE-89","guid":"6d08fdad-37eb-c150-bbf0-d7d946863407","name":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html"},{"id":"CWE-937","guid":"16f316ae-415c-b354-a59b-1f7905f756e9","name":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities","shortDescription":{"text":"Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/937.html"},{"id":"CWE-94","guid":"75e7f50c-6c2f-dd52-bf40-bf6c52b861fd","name":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)","shortDescription":{"text":"Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)"},"helpUri":"https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10","guid":"7d1f0c2e-4b6a-4e39-9a51-0b2e8c3d5f61","version":"2025","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10:2025 web application security risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"A02:2025","guid":"668dee9e-41bc-6354-97d0-fdf8f40c50c1","name":"Security Misconfiguration","shortDescription":{"text":"Security Misconfiguration"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A02_2025-Security_Misconfiguration/"},{"id":"A03:2025","guid":"168e227c-7735-2e57-bc6e-997affe644c5","name":"Software Supply Chain Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software Supply Chain Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A03_2025-Software_Supply_Chain_Failures/"},{"id":"A04:2025","guid":"6a9f5bfd-1a56-6453-beec-a7eff0ba3007","name":"Cryptographic Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Cryptographic Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A04_2025-Cryptographic_Failures/"},{"id":"A05:2025","guid":"87e86033-3231-8458-8e4a-5cb82743553a","name":"Injection","shortDescription":{"text":"Injection"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A05_2025-Injection/"},{"id":"A07:2025","guid":"334ddd78-539d-d35c-83dd-253647eb7eaf","name":"Authentication Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Authentication Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A07_2025-Authentication_Failures/"},{"id":"A08:2025","guid":"84b0c297-710e-9a5f-9335-936ecb260c36","name":"Software or Data Integrity Failures","shortDescription":{"text":"Software or Data Integrity Failures"},"helpUri":"https://top10.owasp.org/2025/A08_2025-Software_or_Data_Integrity_Failures/"}]},{"name":"OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks","guid":"3c9b2a6e-5d14-4f7b-8e02-6a1d9c4b7f35","organization":"OWASP Foundation","informationUri":"https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/","isComprehensive":false,"shortDescription":{"text":"The OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks."},"taxa":[{"id":"CICD-SEC-3","guid":"458c83a6-ebf7-cf55-8cc3-b4d949bbf271","name":"Dependency Chain Abuse","shortDescription":{"text":"Dependency Chain Abuse"},"helpUri":"https://owasp.github.io/www-project-top-10-ci-cd-security-risks/CICD-SEC-03-Dependency-Chain-Abuse"}]}],"properties":{"codehealthPublication":{"public":true,"notice":"This is the PUBLIC form of this artifact. Findings are listed in full, but the details of SECURITY findings \u2014 which rule fired, in which file, on which line, and how to fix it \u2014 are deliberately withheld, and any secret-scanner results are excluded entirely. Where detail is absent here it was REMOVED FOR PUBLICATION; it is not missing from the analysis. The complete artifact is available from the repository owner.","securityFindingsRedacted":18,"secretScannerRunsExcluded":0}},"redactionTokens":["A security finding was recorded here. Its details are withheld on the public artifact \u2014 ask the repository owner for the full report."]}]}